Mediaboss Marketing

The National LGBTQ Task Force was founded 47 years ago, when antisodomy laws and bar raids were common and many health professionals considered gay and bi people ill. Lobbying for change in the halls of power, the D.C.-based organization chipped away at discriminatory laws and challenged Democrats to stand by their queer constituency, working to secure rights through the Reagan era and the devastation of AIDS.

By the time Rea Carey began to leave a mark on the Task Force as deputy executive director in 2004, the marriage equality battle was raging and a backlash brewing. While the Task Force was central in the fight for marriage, it was far from the organization's only issue, as it also advocated for immigration reform, protections for LGBTQ+ families, trans rights, and racial justice. Through all this, Carey who became executive director of the organization 12 years ago remained a determined, calm presence who put the work first.

Under Carey's leadership, the Task Force's Creating Change conferences attracted LGBTQ+ activists from around the country for lively and sometimes controversial discussions. Most recently, the group marshaled its resources to ensurequeer participation in the U.S. Census, fighting against the Trump administration's efforts to reduce LGBTQ+ representation in the national population count that determines billions in funding and the distribution of Congressional seats.

Now Carey is preparing to leave the Task Force, handing over the reins early next year to Kierra Johnson, a bisexual woman of color currently serving as deputy executive director. We spoke with Carey about why this was the time to go, and what's next for her storied organization.

The Advocate: Tell us about your history with The Task Force.Rea Carey: I've been at the Task Force in some ways, in my heart, since I was 16 years old. I remember in Denver I'd go to this women's bookstore, about the time I was coming out, and I read about the Task Force and I thought, Thisis a cool organization. I never actually dreamed I would end up working there.

I actually joined the Task Force first as senior strategist and then as deputy executive director in 2004, and I became executive director in 2008, so about 17 years [I've worked there] or, in movement years, 276 years.

Why was now the right time to leave?I've been thinking about it for a while. There were certain things I wanted to achieve and that I told the board I wanted to achieve when I came on as executive director in 2008. And with the staff and our volunteers and thousands of activists across the country, we've achievedso much and, actually, more than I ever could have imagined.

Because I'm an organizational nerd, I actually know it's very good and healthy for organizations to have different leaders at different times. So I've been planning for it and the time is now; the time is right.

I will say I have a bit of sadness because this year doesn't look like how I thought it would. I had hoped I'd be able to travel around the country and spend time with people we've been doing grassroots organizing work with for decades; having house parties and raising some money off of me and being in-person at [the] Creating Change [conference] this year. Unfortunately, because of COVID those things aren't possible. But like we're doing in different ways, we're adapting, and there are others ways I'll get to connect with people this year.

Tell us about the woman who will replace you and the future of the Task Force.I'm so excited that we are also announcing our next executive director is Kierra Johnson, who has served as our deputy executive director for almost the last three years and was on the board of directors; she's been a colleague of mine for years. She recently used to run a reproductive justice organization called Urge and she's dynamic and brilliant and energized.

It's anyone's dream when they leave an organization to leave it with someone who's even more wonderful and perfect for the organization, and she is. She's spent a lot of time doing advocacy organizing and grassroots; doing national advocacy as well. So she'll be starting as ED in February 2021. She's really been a true partner over the last number of years. We've continued to move the organization forward fully as a racial, economic, gender and social justice organization that serves the LGBTQ community. So she's bringing all her experience to the next era of the Task Force.

How are advocacy organizations like the Task Force adapting to fundraising challenges in the COVID era?With COVID and the entire country shutting down in March a lot has changed. And I'll say, basically, there are no silver linings to COVID, but here are some opportunities.Whether it's fundraising and reaching out to a much broader set of people through our online engagement or our trainings very soon we have a racial justice training, and in the past we would hold that in this or that city and we'd be able to gather a 100 or so people in person. Well, this year, as soon as we opened registration people began signing up. The same with [the] Creating Change [conference]; we'd usually have between 3,000 to 4,000 people there. What we've been learning from our colleagues who have also hosted conferences is that, while the format is different and we don't get to be together in person, it actually makes it accessible to people who never could have afforded to fly or take a bus to another city or place in the country, and they can actually be in community and learn from each other and share strategies.

Also, we're running the LGBTQ outreach for the U.S. Census. But again we had a game plan, going door to door, across the country, asking people to sign up, telling them why it's important our lives are seen and counted, and we haven't been able to do that. But we were able, with some increased funding, to have a massive, massive online campaign, and we're probably reaching people we never would have reached with our Queer the Census campaign.

Where do you think the Task Force and the larger LGBTQ+ movement will be in five to 10 years? What will be the main focus?Certainly, in five to 10 years I expect us to have secured federal nondiscrimination protections. As you know, we won the Supreme Court ruling this summer securing employment protections but we have a long way to go. But in five to 10 years, I absolutely believe we'll have federal protections. But we still won't be finished. Securing freedom and equality and equity is really a life's work, not just for one organization, but the full movement.

We were talking about COVID earlier, so what we've seen even in the last six months is that the disparities that we knew already existed; the health disparities, the access disparities, the racial disparities, the violence that has existed for so long against so many members of our community and Black people in this country has only become more pronounced and more acute. We have learned from movements that have come before us, even if you secure laws, it doesn't mean that everyone can live their life to the fullest. So the future work of the Task Force and the future work of the movement, which is to ensure our vision and I know Kierra shares this vision, and I think will take it even further than I have ever been able to [is to]seek change based on all of us being whole people. We can't be a lesbian one day, a parent the next day, and Latinx the third day; we're all of those things every day. Until we move the country and not just the laws fully in a direction where ever single one of us can be fully who we are, our movement's work will not be complete.

What was your hardest moment leading the Task Force and your proudest moment?It's hard to pick one that was the hardest. We faced a lot of challenges; we lost at the ballot on marriage, 32, 33 times before we started winning. We were not successful as a broader progressive community in securing immigration reform. There are some bigger-picture things I certainly wish had gone a certain way. There are a couple moments that really encapsulate some of the hardest moments.

I was in Los Angeles for the election in 2008. We had been going door to door on Prop. 8 [the ballot initiative that sought to reverse marriage equality in California]. We had been calling people; we brought people of faith to the table. We had done everything we possibly could as well as our colleagues on the ground and from around the country. And I remember that night, the leadership of different organizations coming together to have a pep rally in the middle of the night. We still hadn't gotten the presidential results or results on Prop. 8. We were concerned that the direction things were headed in for Prop. 8 were not good, but were hopeful for Obama. I remember getting on that stage and trying to dig deep for hope. And at 5 the next morning, when were still hoping there were more ballots to be counted, but we knew we were nearing the end and it still took a couple of days to sort it all out.

The feeling of elation over the first-ever Black president was one of the highest highs I've ever felt, and realizing that so many of our coworkers and neighbors, congregation members, had voted for Prop. 8 and against our ability to create the kind of families we want, was devastating. And we had lost before and we lost after, but there was something about Prop. 8 and the combination of the election with the president that really was one of our hardest points. At the same time, it turned into one of the most extraordinary catalysts for our community. After that, people who had never been engaged in this work, got engaged. Even with fear in their hearts, people got up the courage to come out and talk about why [marriage equality] mattered.

Even some of the most bitter moments have turned into opportunities for us. One other time that was both heartbreaking but gave me hope, and still gives me hope, was The Task Force and I were very involved in the comprehensive immigration reform work. At the time, most of our movement and most of our community was focused only on binational couples when it came to immigration as a policy matter. So the Task Force worked hard to make sure that our community really understood what immigration and immigration reform would mean. That it isn't only about binational couples, it's about trans immigrants, it's about families, it's about folks coming to this country and even then, treated in horrible, horrible conditions.

I was part of two civil disobedience actions that took place in D.C. one with women from many movements who came together and sat down in the streets and got arrested in protests. And the other was with young people; young immigrants. I thought, if they can sit down in the street and risk so much, we can too. So there are moments like that that have given me hope. I know at this time we need a lot of hope.

Thank you for all the work and years of effort that you and the Task Force have put into our lives and the equality movement.I have been honored to serve a movement and a community of which I'm a part. I have no doubt, even with the challenges we face now, that our history of resilience and determination and fierceness is going to win the day.

Go here to read the rest:
Rea Carey on Why She's Leaving the National LGBTQ Task Force - Advocate.com

Current Odyssey Project student Faleshuh Walker created this piece, earning second place for artwork in this years Why Vote? contest.

For Hedi Rudd, the decision to vote is both personal and powerful. In her award-winning essay for the 2020 Why Vote? project contest, she writes of the significance of her vote:

My vote will tell my children and grandchildren that I stood against corruption and racism and that I dont ignore the past but learn from it. My vote will tell my friends that I care about their access to healthcare and immigration reform. It will tell my neighbors that I believe in their right to protest, their right to housing and their right to hold leaders accountable. It will tell the world that humanity and our planet are sacred.

For more than a decade, the Why Vote? contest has asked current and former students of the University of WisconsinMadison Odyssey Project to create an original work that convinces people to get out the vote.

The contest is a prelude to the nonpartisan event, A Celebration of Voting, which this year takes place online, Saturday, October 3, from 2 to 3:30 p.m. The celebration is designed to share voting information with attendees; representatives from The League of Women Voters will be on hand to answer voting questions.

A robust, inspiring program will feature Rudd and other Odyssey Project students and alumni, who will share their award-winning essays, poems and artwork, as well as short presentations on voting by prominent local leaders and actors, including:

The event is free and open to the public. Those interested in attending should complete the online registration form for access to the Zoom link.

A Celebration of Voting is presented biennially by the UW Odyssey Project, a program that empowers adults to overcome adversity and achieve dreams through higher education. Each year, the Odyssey Project offers a free two-semester humanities class for 30 adults, providing textbooks, childcare and a weekly dinner. They earn six credits in English from UWMadison, as well as gain critical thinking skills and a sense of empowerment. Many go on to complete a college degree and find meaningful work in the community.

The Odyssey class emphasizes civic engagement, with readings from Socrates, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Martin Luther King, Jr. Students make connections between historic civil rights struggles and their own lives.

Odyssey Project Director Emily Auerbach says that the A Celebration of Voting event is a natural complement to the program, which strives to help students develop and use their voices.

Civic engagement has been one of Odysseys goals since its beginning in 2003, Auerbach says. We want to encourage our students, their families and the broader community to become excited about voting, get practical information about how to vote and use the power of their own voices to convince others to vote.

Stanley Sallay, Odyssey 07, used the power of the pencil to create his award-winning illustration for this years Why Vote? contest. Replete with symbolism and detail, his drawing is largely a study of those who neglected to vote. The central figure, Sallay writes, is a man running as if hes in a rush. I dont have time to figure out whos running and vote. The road that hes running on is broken and leads to nowhere. The pair of dice near his feet is showing how hes choosing to leave his future to chance.

Sallay says the illustration was inspired by the idea of votes lost to those who are unwilling or unable to vote or who dont believe its important.

I didnt vote four years ago because I thought there was no way Trump would win, he says. Since then, Ive wondered how many votes didnt happen because of people who thought the same.

For more information on the Odyssey Project, see theprogram websiteor contact director Emily Auerbach at emily.auerbach@wisc.edu. To donate to the program or become a volunteer, visit theSupport Odyssey webpage.

See the original post:
Odyssey Project students and local leaders to celebrate voting at online event - University of Wisconsin-Madison

As the US Presidential election nears, the top concern for small businesses is the economy.

A new poll by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and MetLife reveals over half (57%) of small business owners rank the economy as the first or second most important issue influencing who they will cast their votes for.

Besides the economy other issues that keep businesses up at night include:

In terms of demographics, women small business owners rate race issues next to the economy that will determine which way they vote. Female small business owners are twice (16%) as likely to consider racial inequality comparedto their male counterparts (8%). Veteran owned businesses for their part view education (25%) and immigration reform (19%) as important next to the state of the economy.

2020 has also seen more engagement among small businesses in terms of elections compared to 2016. Some 62% of small business ownersare more interestedinthe 2020election compared to 2016.Small businesses in the Midwest are more likely to show interest (71%) when compared to in the South (63%), in the Northeast (58%), and in the West (57%).

According to the Small Business Index, businesses are still trying to recover from the effects of COVID-19. So much so, 74% of them are concerned about the impact of COVID-19.

This has prompted many to have predominantly negative feelings towards the current state of the economy. This is with 78% of small businesses describing the economy as average, somewhat poor, or very poor in August. The dissatisfaction in August shows an increase of 8 points from Julys poll.

A further 81% of small businessessay that the impact of a candidates policies on their business will determine how they vote. However, 68% of small business owners agree that it is more important for political leaders to compromise than stick to their beliefs in order to get things done. Overwhelmingly (82%) of small business owners believe partisan gridlock in the federal government is a serious problem.

Image: Depositphotos.com

Originally posted here:
Economy Most Important Issue for Small Business Owners Ahead of Election - Small Business Trends

Photo Credit/ Pixabay and Flickr, Edited by Natalie Irula

Natalie Irula

Editor-in-Chief

At a month and a half away, the Presidential Election has boiled down to Republican nominee President Donald Trump versus Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Trumps re-election campaign focuses on American first, as he told Time in an interview, while stressing the accomplishments of his current term.

Bidens campaign is very much a response to Trumps, focusing on the changes he will make as well as the policies he plans to implement.

At his second convention acceptance speech, Trump can be quoted stating, Our opponents believe that America is a depraved nation. We want our sons and daughters to know the truth: America is the greatest and most exceptional nation in the history of the world. Our country wasnt built by cancel culture, speech codes and soul-crushing conformity. We are not a nation of timid spirits. We are a nation of fierce, proud and independent American Patriots, according to the New York Times.

His hot topics include the economy, jobs, immigration and foreign policy. As we near the end of the campaigning season, we see other relevant topics coming up such as environmental issues, education, criminal justice, gun regulation and health care, on which both nominees differ greatly.

Biden can be quoted in his convention acceptance speech as stating, If you entrust me with the presidency, I will draw on the best of us, not the worst. I will be an ally of the light, not the darkness. Its time for us, for we, the people, to come together. And make no mistake, united we can and will overcome this season of darkness in America. Well choose hope over fear. Facts over fiction. Fairness over privilege. Im a proud Democrat. And Ill be proud to carry the banner of our party into the general election, according to NPR.

The former US Senator and Vice President represents himself as progressive, as he campaigns to build back better, an initiative to build America not with what has worked in the past, but with the future in mind.

Acknowledging Trumps current term, citizens have more of a holistic view of what presidency under him will look like. This can be either a drawback or a benefit, since citizens are able to look back on his term and pull concrete evidence.

The following information can be found on both candidates respective campaign websites.

On the economy, Trump boasts economic growth and jobs, citing 6 million new jobs, a record-breakingly low unemployment rate, a wage growth of 3% for 10 months in a row, the passing of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. and U.S. Gross Domestic Product growth.

Bidens position focuses on reform. He identifies four pillars that stress mobilizing manufacturing and innovation, ingenuity in modern infrastructure and clean energy, talent within education and parenting and racial equity. He also makes a point to raise the minimum wage, benefits and pay for healthcare workers.

Regarding immigration, the former Vice President intends to reverse policies that Trump has put in place during his term. These policies, which, according to the Trump Administration, serve to protect American citizens communities and jobs by further securing the south border, scaling down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, implementing the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office and proposing immigration reform based on merit.

On the other hand, Trump intends to strengthen said policies, while keeping his foreign policy very open. During his term, he has travelled the world, working to restore Americas prominence in global diplomacy. He has held negotiations and made deals with countries such as South Korean, Japan, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Similarly, Biden has pledged to strengthen the USs role in foreign policy, while also re-establishing a commitment to arms control and addressing the Climate Crisis by rejoining the Paris Climate Accord.

His campaign emphasizes climate control and environmental issues. Bidens aggressive approach calls for technological innovation, a clean energy initiative and focus on agricultural preservation.

Trump has an entirely different stance, based on affordability and expanding the job market. He has implemented the Affordable Clean Energy Rule by reversing President Barack Obamas Clean Power Plan and approving the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines.

Regarding education, the Trump Administration has created the Every Student Succeeds Act as well as modified the distribution of Pell grants to benefit students year-round, instead of only during the fall and spring semesters.

Alternatively, Bidens plans are more financially-driven, focused on raising wages and investing in education across America.

In this time of political unrest, many citizens are paying closer attention to criminal justice reform and gun control.

With this in mind, both candidates have put forth the directions they intend to take in the 2020-24 presidential term.

Trump draws our attention to the $98 million in grant funding he has allocated to the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, allowing for 802 additional full-time law enforcement officers, and the expansion of Project Safe Neighborhoods. He praises the U.S. Justice Department for their work and continued efforts on this afront.

On gun-control, he turns to the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms, and believes the Conceal and Carry Permit should be available country-wide.

Biden, however, proposes a $20 million grant that would incentivise state-level policing to shift from incarceration to prevention. He also plans to invest in education, expand funding for mental health and substance abuse research and treatment and to use the power of the U.S. Justice Department to address systemic misconduct in police departments and prosecutors offices.

Additionally, he has identified his plan to start the Task Force on Prosecutorial Discretion. He is much more strict regarding gun control and intends on tightening the reins by establishing the Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse to focus on the connection between mass shootings, online harassment, extremism, and violence against women.

Concerning healthcare, the Trump Administration has repealed the individual mandate from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and approved a six-year extension of the Childrens Health Insurance Program, as well as declared the opioid crisis a nationwide public health emergency.

Biden emphasizes his intention to continue to develop and protect the Affordable Care Act from those who would see it gone and reinstate some Obama Care mandates that have been reversed.

Regarding the race, these two candidates could not be more different and America is torn. Poll-data is not necessarily reliable and it is difficult to predict the outcome of this election, as it was in the 2016 Presidential Election.

As young voters and students, be sure to gather information on each candidates Vice President picks. Trump has decided to continue with the current Vice President, Mike Pence, and Biden has chosen Kamala Harris as his running mate.

Regardless of your political stance, there are many points to consider as the election draws near. Do your research, head to the polls with confidence solidified through education and bring your friends with you.

Natalie Irula

nirula@live.esu.edu

The rest is here:
Six weeks out: How the 2020 Presidential Election is Shaping Up - The Stroud Courier

The San Diego Union-Tribune Editorial Board recently emailed a series of questions to Rep. Scott Peters, D-San Diego, who is running for Californias 52nd Congressional District against Jim DeBello, R-San Diego. Here are the questions and his responses.

What will be your top domestic and international priority in Congress?

Internationally, San Diegans view the Mexican border as an opportunity, not a threat. I championed the effort to bring $500 million in federal investment to fully fund upgrades to the San Ysidro border crossing, the busiest land port in the world, dramatically reducing border waits, spurring tremendous economic activity and job creation. I oppose a wasteful $30 billion wall, as well as the presidents insults against Mexico. Our relationships are critical to solving common problems like pollution in the Tijuana River Valley. I helped secure $300 million as part of the USMCA which I supported, plus $50 million more through annual appropriations, to fix the decades-old problem of cross-border pollution.

Domestically, my top priority in Congress is helping the nation recover from COVID-19. The national economy is in a medically induced coma, which could have been curtailed had the Trump Administration had a quicker, more science-based response. Ive worked to increase investment in scientific research, support trade pacts that protect intellectual property and patent rights of inventors and improve access to higher education by reducing the burden of student debt. Ive championed billions of dollars in military investments here: a new training campus for Navy Seals, new infrastructure at MCAS Miramar and support for 25 new home-ported Navy ships. On the Veterans Affairs Committee, I fought to ensure that our veterans have jobs, health care and support to reduce veteran homelessness and suicide. And, this year, we must seize the moment and tackle and correct the systemic racism that has plagued our nations history.

Read our Q&A with the other candidate in this race below:

Has the pandemic changed your approach to health care? If so, how?

The pandemic has increased the urgency of improving health care. I have always fought to ensure health care is affordable, accessible, innovative, steered by science and data, and driven by wellness instead of treatment. This approach can improve quality of life, save lives, and reduce costs in the long term. Never before has this been as clear as it has been during this pandemic. Those without access to care, who are more likely to have pre-existing conditions, are hit hardest by the virus and more likely to fall victim to its worst affects which are more deadly and more expensive to treat. I have been an outspoken champion both for protecting the Affordable Care Act and also for fixing the parts that need to be fixed, such as keeping insurance premiums lower and more stable. The United States has yet to standardize national, state, county or city-level public reporting on COVID-19, providing experts only a fraction of the data we need to fight the pandemic. Last month, I introduced the Health Statistics Act that will fix detrimental inconsistencies in data collection and reporting, which is essential to effectively combat the coronavirus pandemic.

What more could Congress do to combat climate change?

Scientists have warned that the world must achieve net-zero carbon emissions by midcentury; achieving that milestone is my priority on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. There is no magic bullet. We must 1) decarbonize our economic sectors: electricity, transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, buildings and aviation; 2) regulate damaging short-lived climate pollutants, especially methane; 3) impose a price on carbon; 4) invest in technological innovation for new fuels and energy storage; and 5) develop carbon capture technologies. Ive proposed my own bills and assembled a Climate Playbook of legislation authored in previous years, much of it bipartisan and already on the way to passage. The U.S. must also engage and lead internationally. In 2017, I addressed the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in Vatican City on U.S. climate policy. In 2019, I was honored to help represent our country at the United Nations COP25 climate conference in Madrid.

What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

The Trump Administrations disgraceful hatred and bigotry have plunged our nations immigration system into chaos and continues to hurt Dreamers, their families and our countrys standing in the world.

I support an immigration policy that protects DREAMers and provides them a path to citizenship that allows them to stay in the only country they know. I would create a path to earned citizenship for the 11 million immigrants who have been here for decades and have become part of our essential workforce so they can come out of the shadows, pay into the social safety net and contribute even more to the national economy. And I would reform our immigration system to attract science and technology talent and bolster our workforce throughout the economy, that includes uniting families and keeping families together. I vehemently oppose an immigration policy that separates children from their parents, and one that shuts the door on immigrants from certain countries based on their religion as the Trump Administration has done. I support common-sense immigration reform, like the U.S.A. Act, which would modernize our border security to protect us from those who want to smuggle guns, drugs and people across, as well as fixes several of the problems with the Trump Administrations policies that I described above.

How would you address the massive national debt hanging over Americas future?

According to most economists, the U.S. needs to borrow more money in the near term to address the economic effects of the pandemic, to support businesses, workers and families. However, our national debt is at its highest level since WWII and growing faster than the economy. Every year, interest payments consume a larger and larger portion of taxpayer revenues. That is not sustainable.

Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) and I are working with the Committee on a Responsible Federal Budget and leading a bipartisan group of 30 Democrats and 30 Republicans to call on House and Senate leadership to commit to three policies as part of any future stimulus. First, we must be transparent with Congress and the public on the extent of our deficits and debt through an impartial and professional annual Fiscal State of the Nation report. Second, we would create a bipartisan panel to recommend policies that would avoid the impending insolvency of many of our trust funds, including highways and social security. And third, we would change the current debt ceiling limitation from a political cudgel to a legitimate policy tool to ensure that over time our debt grows more slowly than our economy. These same ideas have been adopted as part of the budget principles of my 50-member, bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus. I have been named a Fiscal Hero by the non-partisan Committee to Fix the Debt three times for my commitment.

Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

I am a member of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee which has broad jurisdiction over San Diegos economic sectors. I have a record of working with everyone, Republicans and Democrats, to get things done. Ive dedicated my career to serving San Diego as an environmental attorney, community volunteer, City Council member and president, port commissioner and chairman, Coastal Commission member and United States congressman. I have authored several bills that have been passed into law to help purple heart veterans get their full education benefits, to help relieve the burden of college debt for working families, to provide better mental health services, and to cut red tape to speed the development of renewable energy sources. Ive been an effective advocate for the region and have brought more than a billion dollars in federal investment back to San Diego, for the military, our border crossing and public transportation. Ive stood up for DREAMers, successfully fought Donald Trumps attempts to defund services for homeless veterans and I played a critical role in defeating attempts by the Trump administration to take health care away from millions of Americans. Ive worked with President Trump when its been good for San Diego, as when we were allocated $300 million to deal with cross border sewage as part of approval of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. But Ive stood up to President Trump when he assaults our interests and values, as he has with immigration and the border. My opponent, on the other hand, made a maximum contribution to Donald Trumps Presidential campaign and continues to support him.

Visit link:
2020 election: Q&A with Rep. Scott Peters, candidate in the 52nd Congressional District - The San Diego Union-Tribune