Mediaboss Marketing

According to a new poll byHarvardHarris Poll given to The Hill has discovered that Americans overwhelmingly oppose sanctuary cities.

The poll states that a whopping 80 percent of voters believe that local law enforcement should comply with Federal immigration laws, and immigration enforcement agents. Furthermore, Americans believe that our immigrations laws need an overhaul, and that criminals need to be deported.

The HarvardHarris Poll survey found strong support for an overhaul of the nations immigration laws, with 77 percent saying they support comprehensive immigration reform against only 23 percent who oppose.

While there is broad support for comprehensive immigration reform, there is overwhelming opposition to sanctuary cities, said HarvardHarris co-director Mark Penn. The public wants honest immigrants treated fairly and those who commit crimes deported and thats very clear from the data.

Whats more, the majority of Americans seem to approve of Trumps plans for more security on our southern border, including punishing cities that harbor illegal aliens.

A majority 52 percent say they support Trumps two executive orders allowing for the construction of a southern border wall, increasing the number of immigration officers by 10,000 and finding a way to revoke federal funds for sanctuary cities.

The crackdown on sanctuary cities is the most popular feature of those actions, followed closely by the directive to increase the border patrol, which is backed by 75 percent of voters.

Despite a very loud opposition to Trumps executive order that paused immigration from high risk countries, it would appear that the poll finds that 56 percentof Americans approve of it until a more reliable vetting system is in place. This approval jumps up to 60 percent when the countries Trump has paused immigration from are described as Muslim majority countries.

Finally, it would appear that when it comes to refugees, the majority of Americans believe that so much of it from these countries has a negative effect on the United States.

Forty-seven percent said allowing refugees into the country has a negative impact on the nation, compared to only 33 percent who said it has a positive effect.

When voters are told that the U.S. is slated to receive 100,000 Syrian refugees, 51 percent said that number should be lower, 34 percent said it is an appropriate number, and 15 percent said the U.S. should allow more.

Americans support both comprehensive immigration reform and stronger vetting and reduced refugees they want a mix of compassion, strong borders, said Penn. They see ISIS as the greatest threat to the country and that is spurring concerns about refugee migration.

Interestingly enough, this survey had a majority of its 2,148 participants identifying as Democrat than Republican, 39 to 30 percent respectively.

See more here:
Poll: A good majority of Americans oppose sanctuary cities, and support Trump's immigration efforts - TheBlaze.com

Immigrants around the mouth of the Columbia River and their employers are expressing increasing anxiety about Trump administration rhetoric on deportations. Its important to place these worries in context, separating truth from myth as the nation feels its way forward toward a new equilibrium on this most fraught of issues.

Some Northwest coastal industries are more reliant than others on immigrant workers. But its fair to say first-generation Americans documented and undocumented are widely dispersed within our economy. Agriculture, shellfish and the hospitality sector particularly depend on hardworking immigrants. In some instances, these jobs pay considerably better than minimum wage, but have undesirable hours or working conditions that dont appeal to native-born Americans with wider options.

While there are few indications that last Thursdays A Day Without Immigrants jobs walk-off resulted in serious business disruptions in the Columbia-Pacific counties, theres no doubt that permanent removal of these workers and their families would have serious negative impacts.

Is there reason to be concerned about such a disruption?

Rumors to the contrary, there has so far been little match between the intensity of President Donald Trumps anti-immigrant language and on-the-ground actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. For example, in the week of Feb. 5-11, ICE says it arrested 680 individuals in targeted enforcement operations. None of these publicized arrests occurred in Oregon, Washington state or elsewhere in the Pacific Northwest. (There may have been other minor arrests here that ICE doesnt consider to be a community arrest, the kind of large-scale bust that creates a corresponding level of hard feelings.)

The 680 number is remarkably consistent with the number of such arrests made in President Barack Obamas first year in office 675 a week. However, Trumps order targets even those who violated a misdemeanor law against crossing the border illegally, while Obama focused on immigrants convicted of serious crimes, those considered threats to national security, and recent arrivals.

Its possible to believe the U.S. should regulate who comes in and stays here, and yet also believe it would be inhumane and economically self-sabotaging to kick out productive immigrants who hold down jobs and raise kids here. Pragmatically, low-population counties like ours lack the excess workforce to fill the vacancies that would be created by wholesale deportations. Even with its undocumented immigrants, Clatsop County has close to full employment.

There has to be a middle course.

Level-headed Republican and Democratic U.S. senators developed such a compromise years ago a path to normalization for immigrants committed to decent, long-term lives here. Its time for the nations business leaders to press our businessman president to recognize the reality of this situation. We must find ways to address labor needs while making sure we know and control who enters the country.

Stay on topic - This helps keep the thread focused on the discussion at hand. If you would like to discuss another topic, look for a relevant article.

Share with Us - We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article, and smart, constructive criticism.

Be Civil - It's OK to have a difference in opinion but there's no need to be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete any comments that we feel are spammy, off-topic, or reckless to the community.

Be proactive - Use the 'Flag as Inappropriate' link at the upper right corner of each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Visit link:
Immigration reform remains necessary - Daily Astorian

The Partnership for a New American Economy advocacy group is led by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. | Getty

The issue of immigration is as contentious as ever, with President Donald Trumps travel ban causing international chaos before it was halted by the courts and a new wave of immigration raids descending in communities nationwide.

But during this weeks congressional recess, pro-reform forces are nonetheless launching a massive and elaborate push to stir up public support for a comprehensive immigration overhaul.

Story Continued Below

The Partnership for a New American Economy, the advocacy group led by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, has recruited a number of congressional Republicans and Democrats to headline events promoting immigration across the country. During those events which range from roundtables to farm tours the group and lawmakers will promote new information compiled by the Partnership for all 435 congressional districts, 50 states and the 60 largest U.S. cities that details the impact of immigration in each area.

Some are well-known proponents of immigration reform, such as Florida Republican Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Carlos Curbelo. But the Bloomberg group has also brought on a number of GOP lawmakers who havent so far been marquee names in the immigration battle, including several from agriculture-heavy states: Oklahoma Reps. Frank Lucas and Steve Russell, and Georgia Reps. Doug Collins, Austin Scott and Drew Ferguson.

The Partnership has even enlisted supporters of Trump who stridently took hardline stances on immigration during his campaign for the White House to back their efforts: Irma Aguirre, a Nevada business owner and member of Latinos for Trump, and Mario Rodriguez, who sits on Trumps Hispanic Advisory Council.

"Immigration is top of the agenda politically, but the national discussion often bears little resemblance to the facts on the ground, said Jeremy Robbins, the groups executive director. In community after community and industry after industry, immigration is helping America and American workers."

About 100 events will be held nationwide during recess, primarily in conservative and swing districts and states, according to the group. Also participating will be local farm bureaus and chambers of commerce.

In conjunction with the new push, the Partnership is doing an ad blitz promoting immigration reform that will air inside cabs and digitally in cities such as Houston, Dallas, Las Vegas and Miami.

There are few legislative avenues for immigration this year, although the Trump administration intends to send a supplemental bill to Congress later this year to authorize construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Key senators have also prepared legislation in case Trump revokes the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which grants deportation deferral and work permits to immigrants brought to the United States illegally at a young age.

Here is the original post:
Bloomberg-backed group launches new immigration push under Trump - Politico

Sacramento Bee

Economy would benefit from meaningful immigration reform Sacramento Bee My family immigrated to the United States from Cape Town, South Africa, when I was just a year old, so I understand on a very personal level why people are willing to leave their family, friends and all that they know to start a new life here.

More here:
Economy would benefit from meaningful immigration reform - Sacramento Bee

Sacramento Bee (blog)

State Latino leaders are ready to fight Trump on immigration. Here's why their approach is all wrong Sacramento Bee (blog) Would comprehensive immigration reform have protected many of the undocumented people now vulnerable to Trump's politics? Yes. No matter. For California leaders who have pledged to protect undocumented immigrants, Trump is an adversary they are ... Trump's hardline immigration rhetoric runs into obstacles including TrumpWashington Post 'We Are Turning the Clock Back'The Atlantic A day without immigrants: do such strikes have any impact?FOX31 Denver Reason (blog) -Huffington Post -Charlotte Observer -U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Newsroom all 382 news articles »

Read the original post:
State Latino leaders are ready to fight Trump on immigration. Here's why their approach is all wrong - Sacramento Bee (blog)