Mediaboss Marketing

The Pew Hispanic Center has just released a new report that indicates that the U.S. population would fall in the future if current levels of legal and illegal immigration were not continued.

The projection is that between now and 2065 immigration will account for 88 percent of the countrys population growth. But the study is not focused on the total population, but rather the working-age population. It depicts a drop from 173 million persons aged 25-64 to 166 million if there were no further immigration. Of course, no one is advocating zero immigration. With the continued present level of immigration, the working-age population would increase to 183 million.

The reason for the drop in the working age population without immigration is that the spike in population growth of the postwar baby boom increase is passing as that generation ages and dies. This, of course, is a natural phenomenon that has been long anticipated. The passing of the baby boom is destined to restore population dynamics to a more stable long-term balance.

So, what is the purpose of this report? Pew supports liberal immigration. The report is ammunition for the business interests that oppose the agenda of the Trump administration to tighten enforcement against illegal immigration and to reduce legal immigration and refugee flows. Economists and business interests generally support population growth fueled by immigration because of the view that the availability of more workers holds down wages and the availability of more consumers props up consumption of manufactured products.

That is a glass half full perspective. The contrary perspective is a nation with decreased crowding, less demand for new infrastructure, less intrusion on the nations environment and non-renewable resources. Currently efforts to make the country more energy independent and less reliant on fossil fuels are eroded by the growing population of energy consumers. That Sisyphean challenge will be much more realistic when the population tends to stabilize with a lower level of immigration.

The rest is here:
What if the U.S. Population Wanes? | Immigration Reform Blog - ImmigrationReform.com (blog)

One of the many sideshows overshadowing serious national and international issues is over who will pay for the big beautiful wall along the southern border that President Trump has promised to build. The president says Mexico will. The Mexicans say they wont.

Lost in the barrage of schoolyard taunts are several important matters. First, not only would the United States benefit from secure barriers along the border, but so too would many Mexicans. Second, taxing, or imposing fees on, remittances sent out of the country (not just to Mexico) is not an unreasonable proposition.

The lawless border between the two countries is not just a problem for the United States. Communities in Mexico are plagued by criminal cartels that engage in cross-border activities like smuggling of drugs and human beings. Interdicting rampant criminal activity along the border would loosen the grip of these violent syndicates on communities in northern Mexico, ending their reign of terror, and enabling honest and productive businesses to flourish.

From the standpoint of the United States, collecting fees on money transfers out of the country would not be entirely punitive. Remittances represent a very significant but often overlooked cost of mass immigration. According to the World Bank, $133.5 billion flowed out of the U.S. in 2015. In 2016, remittances to Mexico (mostly from the U.S.) hit an all-time high of $27 billion exceeding that countrys revenues from oil exports.

This massive outflow of money harms local economies in the U.S. The $133.5 billion that was earned here and shipped elsewhere is money that is not recirculated through local economies, stimulating local economic growth and generating revenues for local governments. Moreover, many of those working here illegally are being paid under the table, so the money is not taxed when it is earned. It is not unreasonable, therefore, for the United States to consider recouping some of the cost of the fence by collecting fees or taxes on funds being transferred abroad.

Most importantly, regardless of who pays for the fence, both the United States and Mexico would benefit greatly from a secure shared border that is open to legitimate commerce and travel, but secured against illegal immigration and criminal activity.

Read this article:
Mexico Would Benefit from a Wall Too | Immigration Reform Blog - ImmigrationReform.com (blog)

The Daily Banter

My Family Is Living In Hell Thanks To Donald Trump's Inhumane Immigration Policies The Daily Banter We could not fathom the thought of our child growing up without his father so we stopped the process and hoped Congress would pass immigration reform. Over the next decade we built a life together and our son grew into a well-adjusted, smartass pre ...

The rest is here:
My Family Is Living In Hell Thanks To Donald Trump's Inhumane Immigration Policies - The Daily Banter

OUR SYSTEM CAUSES THE VERY PROBLEMS WE ALL DECRY

I am against illegal immigration; I am for legal immigration and wish to widen the avenues toward legal immigration. However, under our current policy, sometimes the process of legal immigration could literally take 100 years. Some say that the illegals should get into the back of the line. Well, that completely ignores the fact that sometimes there is no line to get into the back of. Saying we must first secure the border before we pass immigration reform is like a doctor telling a cancer patient we must first wait for all the cancer symptoms to go away before we treat the cancer. Our immigration system causes the very problems we all decry.

I agree with former U.S. Senator Jim DeMint who during his 2004 U.S. Senate campaign supported a robust worker visa plan. Despite competing for some low-wage jobs against American born non-high school graduates, overwhelmingly as Mexicans move in Americans move up the income ladder.

Of course its not Republicans who are against a worker visa plan, it is the Democrats who oppose it at the behest of their financial backers the unions. The worker visa solution during the Bracero program of the 1950s reduced illegal immigration arrests by some 90 percent. It gave immigrants a legal path to enter the country whereby we could document and permit them and thus they were more than happy to choose a legal form of entry. In fact, if a border patrol caught an undocumented worker, he would simply drive that worker across the border into Mexico, document and permit him, and then drive him back north of the border and drop him off at his work site, usually to pick crops at some local farm.

I adamantly oppose welfare benefits for these workers for two reasons: Its both bad for the American taxpayers and bad for the recipients as welfare leads to government dependence and deprives workers of the opportunity to feel proud of themselves which comes through hard work not government handouts.

In addition, our current policy makes it much harder to find terrorists and other dangerous criminals. When youre looking for the bad guys, youre looking for needles in a haystack. Having over 10 million undocumented workers creates millions of forged documents, which provides plenty of cover for the bad guys.

I also agreed with Mitt Romney on the higher-skilled immigrants. He said we should staple an H1-B visa to every diploma we hand out to foreign graduates, many of whom are the worlds best and brightest, receiving PHDs in STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) fields which are needed by a growing, innovative, globally competitive economy.

We are educating the worlds best and brightest, people who according to a study commissioned by Bill Gates would have created five American jobs per high-end skilled immigrant we kick out of the country. Our country has an approximately 70,000 cap per year on H1-B visas and they are used up in three to four days. And only 13 percent of these go to actual workers, the balance is for their spouses and dependents.

This cap should be lifted to reflect the demands for these workers as well as the benefits to our economy. These would-be immigrants are very entrepreneurial. In fact, Sergey Brin, an immigrant from Russia founded Google which has created tens of thousands of high-paying jobs. Meanwhile Gates has opened an office in Vancouver, Canada just north of his Seattle, Washington office to hire these high skilled workers and they are contributing to the economy paying taxes in Canada not America.

Im against amnesty, but am open to realistic solutions.

With respect to the current borders crossings by Mexican youth, this problem is created by our disastrous War on Drugs which by one estimate puts $300 billion per year into the hands of the most violent criminals on the face of the earth. Not only that, weve given the Mexican government money to wage war with the drug cartels and now children are gettingcaught up in the crossfire. Many Mexican policemen are given the choice of plata o plomo, which means silver or lead. They can either accept hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes or they can refuse and be killed or have a member of their family killed. The effects of our disastrous drug policy are now spilling over onto U.S. soil.

Drugs are bad but as we learned in the aftermath of the only constitutional amendment ever repealed, prohibition is worse.

Thomas Ravenel is the former treasurer of South Carolina and one of thestars of Southern Charm, a Charleston, S.C.-based reality television show that airs nationally on Bravo TV.

WANNA SOUND OFF? Submit your guest column or letter to the editor via-email HERE or via our tip-line HERE

Follow this link:
Thomas Ravenel: On Immigration - FITSNews

Immigrant and civil rights advocates celebrated Friday as Daniela Vargas, a Mississippi Dreamer who was detained by federal agents minutes after speaking at a news conference about her plight, was released from custody.

The 22-year-old, who was brought to the United States from Argentina when she was 7, spent more than a week at the LaSalle Detention Facility in Jena, La., following her arrest in Jackson, Miss.

Daniela is really happy to be out right now, understandably, her attorney, Abigail Peterson, told reporters. "She was very surprised this morning, when all this happened, and very relieved. She was told to get her things, and she was given about five minutes to get out, and she took it.

Vargas case drew nationwide attention in part because she had been accepted for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, an Obama administration measure that allows so-called Dreamers, young immigrants brought into the country illegally as children, to obtain work permits and protects them from deportation.

She also won publicity because her attorneys claimed she was targeted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in retaliation for speaking to the media about her hopes for immigration reform and the effect of enforcement raids on her family.

This is a moment for celebration in what has been a terrifying set of months for the immigrant community and their families, said Karen Tumlin, legal director for the National Immigration Law Center in Los Angeles. Today shows you what happens when a brave young woman stands up stands up and expresses her rights, the rights of her family and community and fights back.

After she was released at around noon, Vargas was driven back to Mississippi by a friend.

The deportation order against her has not been rescinded, however, and she is required to check in with her local ICE office in April, her attorneys said.

One of the worries is they could enforce it at any point, Peterson said, noting that the decision to release her seemed to be the result of prosecutorial discretion, based largely on community pressure and media attention.

At the beginning of the week, a coalition of civil rights and immigration attorneys filed a petition in federal court alleging that enforcement agents violated Vargas constitutional due process rights and her right to be free from retaliation for protected speech. The petition sought her immediate release, as well as a hearing before an immigration judge to challenge the decision to deport her.

On Friday, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued an order transferring that habeas petition to the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

According to attorneys, Vargas has two pending applications for immigration relief. First, although her DACA status expired in November 2016 while she says she was trying to save up the $495 needed to renew it, her attorneys filed a renewal application in February.

She also has a pending 2014 petition for a non-immigrant U visa based on her status as the child of a victim of a serious crime who has suffered mental or physical abuse and is cooperating with the investigation of criminal activity.

We will continue to challenge the unconstitutional actions of ICE agents in this case and will not rest until she is no longer under threat of deportation, Naomi Tsu, deputy legal director at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said in a statement. It is counterproductive and harmful to our communities for ICE to be targeting aspiring young people in this country.

Jarvie is a special correspondent.

Originally posted here:
Mississippi 'Dreamer' Daniela Vargas released from detention but deportation order stands - Los Angeles Times