Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

Donald Trump’s Immigration Reform Plan: American Workers …

The paper is detailed to the level of specific areas of policy, and it also calls out one of his opponents, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), the author of the last Congress Gang of Eight amnesty billas being the personal senator of billionaire Mark Zuckerberg, because Rubio is doing Zuckerbergs bidding by pushing for an increase in H-1B visas to replace American workers in high-tech fields with cheaper foreign labor.

The paperwhich really constitutes a completely new look at immigration and a complete overhaul of the current system, politicians priorities, and special interest involvementstarts with three principles. Firstly, Trump argues, a nation without borders is not a nation.

As such, he writes, there must be a wall across the southern border.

Secondly, Trump argues, a nation without laws is not a nation.

Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced, he writes as part of his second principle.

Thirdly, Trump argues, a nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation.

Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages and security for all Americans, he writes to flesh out the third principle.

The paper, which was clearly influenced by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) who Trump consulted to help with immigration policy, contains three major parts: How a President Trump would handle border security, interior enforcement, and legal immigration policy as it relates to getting Americansat historically low workforce participation rates right nowback to work. Perhaps most importantly, Trump uses the term immigration reform to describe what he will dotaking that term away from those who use it to push for fundamental transformation of the United States with immigration policy.

When politicians talk about immigration reform they mean: amnesty, cheap labor and open borders, Trump writes. The Schumer-Rubio immigration bill was nothing more than a giveaway to the corporate patrons who run both parties. Real immigration reform puts the needs of working people first not wealthy globetrotting donors. We are the only country in the world whose immigration system puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own. That must change.

The plan details not just that Trump believes in putting American workers first over the interest of foreign workers, foreign nations, and special interests, but how he would do so. Trump is the first and only presidential candidate this cycle who has done this and gone into this level of policy detail.

Decades of disastrous trade deals and immigration policies havedestroyed our middle class, Trumps position paper reads. Today, nearly 40% of black teenagers are unemployed. Nearly 30% of Hispanic teenagers are unemployed. For black Americans without high school diplomas, the bottom has fallen out: more than 70% were employed in 1960, compared to less than 40% in 2000. Across the economy, the percentage of adults in the labor force has collapsed to a level not experienced in generations. As CBS news wrote in a pieceentitled Americas incredible shrinking middle class: If the middle-class is the economic backbone of America, then the country is developing osteoporosis.

Trump writes that the influx of foreign workers holds down salaries, keeps unemployment high, and makes it difficult for poor and working class Americans including immigrants themselves and their children to earn a middle class wage and that about half of all immigrants and their US-born children currentlylive in or near poverty, including more than 60 percent of Hispanic immigrants.

Every year, we voluntarily admit another 2 million new immigrants, guest workers, refugees, and dependents, growing our existing all-time historic record population of 42 million immigrants, Trump writes. We need to control the admission of new low-earning workers in order to: help wages grow, get teenagers back to work, aid minorities rise into the middle class, help schools and communities falling behind, and to ensure our immigrant members of the national family become part of the American dream. Additionally, we need to stop giving legal immigrant visas to people bent on causing us harm. From the 9/11 hijackers, to the Boston Bombers, and many others, our immigration system is being used to attack us. The President of the immigration caseworkers union declaredin a statement on ISIS: Weve become the visa clearinghouse for the world.

Trump calls for a halt to the issuance of new green cards until Americans are back to work.

Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad, there will be a pause where employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed immigrant and native workers, Trump wrote in a section of the paper called immigration moderation, an area where he cites U.S. Census Bureau data and information from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. This will help reverse womens plummetingworkplace participation rate, grow wages, and allow record immigration levels to subside tomore moderate historical averages.

He called for also increasing the prevailing wage when it comes to the issuance of H-1B visas so as to get Americansespecially Hispanics, blacks, and womenhired into corporate positions in Silicon Valley rather than foreigners. It is here where he points out that Rubiowho along with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is one of the two candidates in the Republican primary against Trump that the donor class is pulling forhas put forward legislation that would drastically harm American workers job prospects, and hes done so on behalf of Zuckerberg and other donors.

We graduatetwo times more Americans with STEM degrees each year than find STEM jobs, yet as much as two-thirds of entry-level hiring for IT jobs is accomplished through the H-1B program, Trump wrote. More than half of H-1B visas are issued for the programs lowest allowable wage level, and more than eighty percent for its bottom two. Raising the prevailing wage paid to H-1Bs will force companies to give these coveted entry-level jobs to the existing domestic pool of unemployed native and immigrant, instead of flying in cheaper workers from overseas. This will improve the number of black, Hispanic and female workers in Silicon Valleywho have been passed over in favor of the H-1B program. Mark Zuckerbergs personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities.

Trump also laid out his belief that there should be a requirement that companies hire Americans before hiring foreigners from visa programs.

Too many visas,like the H-1B, have no such requirement, Trump wrote, citing testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and a Forbes magazine report about how incomes are falling in the U.S. because people are working less. In the year 2015, with 92 million Americans outside the workforce andincomes collapsing, we need to companies to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed. Petitions for workers should be mailed to the unemployment office, not USCIS.

Trump called for an end to the J-1 Visa programessentially a jobs program for foreign youthsand for it to be replaced with a jobs program for American youths in inner cities.

The J-1 visajobs program for foreign youth will be terminated and replaced with a resume bank for inner city youth provided to all corporate subscribers to the J-1 visa program, Trump wrote under a section header calling for a jobs program for inner city youth while citing a National Public Radio report on the J-1 visa program.

Trump calls to end welfare abuse, as well.

Applicants for entry to the United States should be required to certify that they can pay for their own housing, healthcare and other needs before coming to the U.S., he wrote.

He also pushes for the focus of refugee programs and asylum to shift to helping American children get more opportunities in life.

Increase standards for the admission of refugees and asylum-seekers tocrack down on abuses, he wrote, citing congressional testimony and two Breitbart News reports on welfare abuse by refugees in the U.S. and on crime among refugee communities. Use the monies saved onexpensive refugee programs to help place American children without parents in safer homes and communities, and to improve community safety inhigh crime neighborhoods in the United States.

Thats all just legal immigration policy. Trump said generally when it comes to enforcement that he thinks that America needs to defend her laws and the Constitution.

America will only be great as long as America remains a nation of laws that lives according to the Constitution, Trump wrote before setting up a list of specific policies he would implement if elected president to protect the United States from illegal immigration. No one is above the law. The following steps will return to the American people the safety of their laws, which politicians have stolen from them.

Trump details here many things, including that he believes there should be an end to birthright citizenship.

This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration, Trump wrote of birthright citizenship before citing Rasmussen Reports polling data showing Americans are opposed to it.By a 2:1 margin, voters say its the wrong policy, including Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) who said no sane country would give automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.

Trump thinks America needs to triple the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers working in the country. Trump said hed pay for it by cutting off tax credit payments currently handed out to illegal aliens.

As the President of the ICE Officers Council explained in Congressional testimony: Only approximately 5,000 officers and agents within ICE perform the lions share of ICEs immigration missionCompare that to the Los Angeles Police Department at approximately 10,000 officers. Approximately 5,000 officers in ICE cover 50 states, Puerto Rico and Guam, and are attempting to enforce immigration law against 11 million illegal aliens already in the interior of the United States. Since 9-11, the U.S. Border Patrol has tripled in size, while ICEs immigration enforcement arm, Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), has remained at relatively the same size. This will be funded by accepting therecommendation of the Inspector General for Tax Administration and eliminating tax credit payments to illegal immigrants.

Trump also believes there should be nationwide E-verify and that such a simple measure will protect jobs for unemployed Americans.

Trump calls for a mandatory return of any criminal illegal aliens in the country to their home countries. The Obama Administration has released 76,000 aliens from its custody with criminal convictions since 2013 alone, Trump wrote. All criminal aliens must be returned to their home countries, a process which can be aided by canceling any visas to foreign countries which will not accept their own criminals, and making it a separate and additional crime to commit an offense while here illegally.

He also called for detention of illegal aliens caught crossing the border, not catch-and-release as has been done under President Obama.

Illegal aliens apprehended crossing the border must be detained until they are sent home, no more catch-and-release, Trump wrote.

Trump believes that America should defund sanctuary cities, too.

The government should, he wrote, cut-off federal grants to any city which refuses to cooperate with federal law enforcement.

There should also, he wrote, be enhanced penalties for overstaying a visa.

Millions of people come to the United States on temporary visas but refuse to leave, without consequence, Trump wrote. This is a threat to national security. Individuals who refuse to leave at the time their visa expires should be subject to criminal penalties; this will also help give local jurisdictions the power to hold visa overstays until federal authorities arrive. Completion of a visa tracking system required by law but blocked by lobbyists will be necessary as well.

In addition to that, Trump believes that the federal law enforcement should work alongside local law enforcements gang task forces to eliminate crime.

ICE officers should accompany local police departments conducting raids of violent street gangs likeMS-13 and the18th street gang, which have terrorized the country, Trump wrote citing news reports about the illegal alien gangs. All illegal aliens in gangs should be apprehended and deported. Again, quoting Chris Crane: ICE Officers and Agents are forced to apply the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Directive, not to children in schools, but to adult inmates in jails. If an illegal-alien inmate simply claims eligibility, ICE is forced to release the alien back into the community. This includes serious criminals who have committed felonies, who have assaulted officers, and who prey on childrenICE officers should be required to place detainers on every illegal alien they encounter in jails and prisons, since these aliens not only violated immigration laws, but then went on to engage in activities that led to their arrest by police; ICE officers should be required to issue Notices to Appear to all illegal aliens with criminal convictions, DUI convictions, or a gang affiliation; ICE should be working with any state or local drug or gang task force that asks for such assistance.

In addition to all of that, Trump laid out how he would build a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico and how he would make Mexico pay for it.

For many years, Mexicos leaders have been taking advantage of the United States by using illegal immigration to export the crime and poverty in their own country (as well is in other Latin American countries), Trump wrote. They have evenpublished pamphlets on how to illegally immigrate to the United States. The costs for the United States have been extraordinary: U.S. taxpayers have been asked to pick up hundreds of billions in healthcare costs, housing costs, education costs, welfare costs, etc. Indeed, the annual cost of free tax credits alone paid to illegal immigrants quadrupled to $4.2 billion in 2011. The effects on jobseekers have also been disastrous, and black Americans havebeen particularly harmed.

He noted that the impact from crime by illegal aliens has been tragic, yet the government of Mexico profits off U.S. incompetence.

In recent weeks, the headlines have been covered with cases of criminals who crossed our border illegally only to go on to commit horrific crimes against Americans, Trump wrote. Most recently, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, with a long arrest record, is charged with breaking into a 64 year-old womens home, crushing her skull and eye sockets with a hammer, raping her, and murdering her. The Police Chief in Santa Maria says the blood trail leads straight to Washington. In 2011, the Government Accountability Office found that there were a shocking3 million arrests attached to the incarcerated alien population, including tens of thousands of violent beatings, rapes and murders. Meanwhile, Mexico continues to make billions on not only our bad trade deals but also relies heavily on the billions of dollars in remittances sent from illegal immigrants in the United States back to Mexico ($22 billion in2013alone).

That means, Trump wrote, that Mexicos government has taken the United States to the cleaners and that they are responsible for this problem, and they must help pay to clean it up.

The cost of building a permanent border wall pales mightily in comparison to what American taxpayers spend every single year on dealing with the fallout of illegal immigration on their communities, schools and unemployment offices, Trump wrote. Mexico must pay for the wall and, until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards of which we issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid cuts are also options]. We will not be taken advantage of anymore.

More here:
Donald Trump's Immigration Reform Plan: American Workers ...

Immigration Reform 2015: Increase Of Immigrants In US …

Immigration reform has emerged as a central issue in the 2016 presidential election asmore and more candidates includetheir stance on the issue as part of their political platform. Sowhat do Americans as a whole think of immigration?

Here's what Gallup has discovered.Only 25 percent of the country prefers an increase in immigration, more than double the 12 percent in a similar June 2002 study, anew Gallup studypublishedMondayrevealed. Some 34percent feel that fewer immigrants should begranted entrance to the country, according to about 40 percent of respondents to this year'ssurvey.

The results were part of Gallup's Minority Rights and Relations survey conducted from June 15 to July 10, which included greater representation of black and Hispanic citizens in the sample than in past years. Known as "over-sampling," the practice involves taking a "closer look at attitudes and opinions of minority groups whose representation in the sample of a standard poll might otherwise be too small for statistical analysis," according to the study. All 2,296 respondents were older than 18; all wereinterviewed by phone.

Through the lens of race, respondents' positions on immigration varied greatly. Hispanic respondents, half of whom reported being immigrants themselves,were most likely to prefer increased immigration at 36 percent. At the other end of the scale,non-Hispanic white citizensdisplayed the lowest support for more immigration, with only 21 percent. African-American voters fell between the two with 30 percent in favor of higher immigration rates.

However, all three groups reported their highestsupport for increasedimmigration rates since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001, the study found.

U.S. Immigration Summary | InsideGov

The presidential candidates' stances on immigration reform this election season reflect the study's diversity in opinion. Immigration issuesdominated the GOP debate Thursday, and the candidates gave varying responses tohow they plan to address undocumented immigrants.

There should be a path for earned legal status for those who are here, former Florida Gov. JebBushsaid. Not amnesty --earned legal status.

Real estate mogul Donald Trump, who credits himself with starting the presidential candidates' campaign trail conversation about immigration reform, reiterated remarks he has made before about wanting to build a border between the country and Mexico.

We need to build a wall, and it has to be built quickly, Trump said. And I dont mind having a big beautiful door in that wall so that people can come into this country legally.

Read more:
Immigration Reform 2015: Increase Of Immigrants In US ...

Trump, immigration reform and Fiorina: Our view

Republican presidential debate in Cleveland on Aug. 6, 2015.(Photo: Chip Somodevilla, Getty Images)

The biggest story going into Thursday nights Republican presidential debate was: What would Donald Trump do? Would the billionaire businessmanplay nice? Act "presidential"? Trump has risen like summer fireworks until now, defying expectations that he would never get into the race, and that if he did, he would never rise very high. But there he was at center stage in Cleveland, thanks to poll numbers double those of his closest rivals.

In his first big test in front of the party faithful, Trump stood out, and not in a good way. Right from the get-go, he showed how little allegiance he has to the GOP by refusing to rule out a third-party run if he fails to win the nomination, even if that mightsplit the party and help a Democrat.

Under sharpquestioning from the Fox News moderators, it didn't get a whole lot better for Trump after that.Asked whetherhe regretted calling women fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals, TrumpcriticizedmoderatorMegyn Kelly for the way you havetreatedme, mocked the idea that he should be politically correct and implied that Kelly and the rest of her gender should lighten up.

He wasnt done. He defended using the bankruptcy laws to stiff creditors, using campaign contributions to buy political access, and flip-flopping on abortion and a variety of other issues.He said the leaders of America were stupid and easily duped by the far cleverer headsof countries such as Iran, China and Mexico. Our country is in serious trouble we cant do anything right, he declared in his closing summation.

For some of his fans, Trump undoubtedly channeled their angerand delivered thebrashness they've come to expect.Othersmight well have been turned off by his lack of substance and pessimistic views about America.Forthose not on the Trump bandwagon, hisfirst debate performance should reinforcedoubts about whetherheissomeone who should be leading the nation.

A strange way to court the Hispanic vote

After Mitt Romney lost to Barack Obama in 2012, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus commissioned an autopsy to determine how to do better next time. Among other things, the report concluded that alienating Hispanic-American voters with talk of self deportation badly damaged the partys presidential candidate.

You cant call someone ugly and expect them to go to the prom with you, the report noted, pleading with the GOP to stop offending Hispanics and embrace comprehensive immigration reform. If we do not, the report said, our partys appeal will continue to shrink to its core constituencies only.

Priebus has been getting his answer to this advice from the 2016 GOP candidates, and its not the one he wanted. Only one of the 17 Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has consistently supported a path to citizenship, according to a recent Politifact.com analysis. Others have never supported what they like to call amnesty for undocumentedimmigrants, and those who used to support the possibility of citizenship have backtracked or waffled or simply changed their views. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said Thursday night he changed his position after I listened to the American people. Thats code for saying he didn't think he couldget the GOP nomination if he continued to hold a position thats toxic among most of the Republicans who vote in the partys presidential primaries.

See the rest here:
Trump, immigration reform and Fiorina: Our view

Immigration Reform 2015: US Asylum Backlogs Soaring …

Its been more than a year since Abdul, a 35-year-old Syrian native, last heard from U.S. officials holding on to his request for asylum, the last sliver of hope for his future in the United States. Its been almost three since he last saw his wife and young son, who have no choice but to remain on the other side of the globe until his application gets resolved.

I have tried every trick in the book to speed up my process, said Abdul, who asked not to use his full name for fear of jeopardizing his case. But constant office visits, phone calls and letters to members of Congress have done him little good in the years since he first filed his asylum request. Meanwhile, his son is growing up without him.

This experience is increasingly common for the thousands of asylum seekers who escape persecution and violence in their home countries every year, searching for refuge in the United States. The migrant influxthatoverwhelmed the southern U.S. border last summer also has flooded asylum offices and immigration court dockets, leaving lawyers, judges and asylum officers with mushrooming caseloads while immigrants spend months and years mired in uncertainty. The federal government isn't providing nearly enough resources to stem the soaring backlog, either, critics said.

The number of pending asylum petitionshas increased by more than 800 percent over the last four years, stretching out the period of uncertainty in some casesfrom six months to two years, or from two years to four.The wait isparticularly grueling for those like Abdul, who remainseparated from their families with no clear answers on their status or time frame for a resolution.

Abdul considershimself one of the lucky ones, having had the resources to make it to the U.S. in the first place. As an asylum seeker, he was able to get a U.S. work permit, which has allowedhim to make enough money to support himself and his family in Kuwait. But the financial and emotional toll of the long separation has mounted over the years.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is responsible for hiring and managing asylum officers. Reuters/Keith Bedford

Originally, he expected to be separated from his family for just a month or two. They were well-off and educated Syrians living in Damascus, where he ran a small importing business. But by 2012, the chaos of Syrias civil war spread to the capital, and abductions of people in Syrias business class began to spread. Abdul sent his wife, Rachel, and son, Moe, to Kuwait, where Rachel had family members. It would be a vacation of sortswhile they waited for things to settle down in Damascus.

However, they never did, and in February 2013, Abdul discovered that the Syrian regime was hunting for a customer of hisand targeting anyone connected to himin order to get to him. Abdul was one of those connections, even though he had onlya business relationship with the man they were searching for. He fled the country the next day with a pre-existing business visa to the United States.

I left the country with a backpack and thats all. There was no time to do anything. I know for sure if you are detained or captured by the regime, you will be tortured and killed, he recalled.

Rachel and Moe are livingin Kuwait as unauthorized residents, unable to go back to Syria. And although they pay regular penalties to the Kuwaiti government for overstaying their visas, they have few options there. Rachel is not allowed to work, even though she has advanced degrees in English and business. Moe isbanned from attending school, and private and international schools have refused to accept him. Hospitals willnot treat them, either.

Read more here:
Immigration Reform 2015: US Asylum Backlogs Soaring ...

Immigrants, Immigration Reform and the 2016 American …

Donald Trump's racist remark reminds us that the hatred towards immigrants is alive and well in a country that practices integration and acceptance of all. Very few Americans understand the current Hispanic changing demographic trends, its implications, political importance, and their electoral votes. The 2016 Presidential election has slowly but surely developed into a debate on the politics of immigration reform and the courting of Hispanic electoral votes. Whether we admit or not, the Hispanic vote not only became a political weapon in 2012, but in 2016, the Hispanic vote will dictate who will become the future leader of the free world.

The immigration debate has left the United States of America divided along racial, ethnic and political lines, never seen before in our great country. Not only has the debate gone beyond the boundaries of our socio-economic spectrum. The 2013 Immigration Reform bill becomes a stumbling domestic policy for the potential presidential candidates. Very few candidates have addressed immigration reform with any constructive dialogue or solutions, and even those who have addressed immigration have doomed themselves to failure in the eyes of many Hispanics electorates, including presidential hopeful Donald Trump.

Immigration has always been the basic DNA of America and it has taken away the best of who we are and what we can become as a nation. Immigration reform has more implications for America's future than many of us can foresee; not only socially, culturally and economically, but Hispanic political presence, is already shaping and defining a new American political landscape. Whether we admit it or not, many of our immigration laws and the politics behind them have been historically woven with racial prejudice against recent immigrants. Very few Americans remember the historical racism that Mexican immigrants encountered in the early 1900's. The 1929 stock market crash which led to the greatest depression in American history, a time when one out four Americans was unemployed, our economy shattered and confidence in American idealism was tested. As Americans suffered from the economic depression, Mexican immigrants became the scapegoat for America's economic, social, and political problems. As a result, Mexican immigrants were denied jobs, subjected to raids, illegally arrested and detained without due process. As a result of this fear of immigrants, the American government between 1929 to 1939 deported some one to two million Mexican American citizens and legal residents of Mexican descent; this mass deportation was known as the Mexican Repatriation policy with the aim of cleansing America's ill. Fast forward to the 21st century, and the political debacle of the current immigration debate has left the United States of America divided along racial, ethnic and political lines, never seen before in our great country.

The growth of the Hispanic electorate will be an important factor in an increasing number of congressional and presidential races across the country in the 2016 elections and beyond. More numbers mean more votes; the Hispanic electorate now represents swing votes in some 14 states and can increase to 16 states by the presidential election of 2016. This increased population growth along with immigration reform will bring more votes to the table, and how to attract those voters becomes a political chess game for both Democrats and Republicans in future elections. Moreover, how both parties handle the issue of comprehensive immigration reform will have a serious impact on Hispanic political voting behavior in 2016 presidential and future elections.

History reminds us that the mobilization of the Hispanic votes and their response to anti-immigrant polices can be detrimental for a political party. Both political parties must be cautious and reflect on California's Proposition 187, an anti-immigrant policy which outlawed affirmative action and bilingual programs in the early 1990s and its long term effect on the Republican Party that sponsored the legislation. California's political landscape was never the same and became heavily democratic as a result of Proposition 187 anti-immigrant policy directed towards Hispanics. Not only did it mobilize the Hispanic vote in California, it destroyed their relationship with the Republican Party and alienated the party from an important voting bloc for future elections.

Whatever the debates might be, neither political party can afford to ignore or play with the Hispanic vote. Immigration reform is a key tool to courting America's greatest political asset and the future of the American presidency. How and when both political parties address immigration reform remains a struggle; a common-sense ideology on immigration reform by both the Democratic and Republican parties on a sensible solution to the civil rights issue of the 21st century---immigration reform. Failure to do so and to court the Hispanic vote can lead to catastrophic alienation of both political parties and their future in American politics.

See the article here:
Immigrants, Immigration Reform and the 2016 American ...