Will Common Sense Rule on Immigration Reform?
"The proposed amendment would prioritize deportation for illegals convicted of sex abuse and domestic violence. It also would promote the hiring of U.S. citi...
By: bethepeopletv
Read more here:
Will Common Sense Rule on Immigration Reform? - Video
A "Conservative and Compassionate" Approach to Immigration Reform | "Dana"
Dana Loesch interviews Alberto Gonzales and David Strange about their new immigration ideas. Watch full episodes of Dana weeknights, live at 6pm ET, or on demand with a subscription to TheBlaze.
By: TheBlaze
Original post:
A "Conservative and Compassionate" Approach to Immigration Reform | "Dana" - Video
Deferred Action for Parental Accountability Panel Discussion at UTSA
Replay the video from the NOWCastSA webcast of the UTSA College of Public Policy #39;s panel discussion on immigration reform and the Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) program....
By: NOWCastSA
Go here to read the rest:
Deferred Action for Parental Accountability Panel Discussion at UTSA - Video
Radio Show, 2015, 30 January 2013, #immigration reform, H-4 EAD, SB-1 Visa, 212(d))(3)) Waiver
Discussing, Immigration Reform, H-4 EAD, SB-1 Visa, 212(d)(3) Waivers, Obama #39;s Visit SUBSCRIBE to Immigration.com YouTube Channel for further updates. Immigration.com, Law Offices of Rajiv...
By: Rajiv S. Khanna
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 Long title An Act making omnibus consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes. Acronyms (colloquial) IIRIRA Nicknames Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 Enactedby the 104th United States Congress Effective September 30, 1996 Citations Public Law 104-208 Statutes at Large 110Stat.3009 aka 110 Stat. 3009-546 Codification Titles amended 8 U.S.C.: Aliens and Nationality U.S.C. sections amended Legislative history Introduced in the House as H.R. 3610 by C. W. Bill Young (R-FL) on June 11, 1996 Committee consideration by House Appropriations, Senate Appropriations, House Judiciary Passed the House on June 13, 1996(278126, Roll call vote 247, via Clerk.House.gov) Passed the Senate on July 18, 1996(7227, Roll call vote 200, via Senate.gov, in lieu of S. 1894) Reported by the joint conference committee on September 28, 1996; agreed to by the House on September 28, 1996(37037, Roll call vote 455, via Clerk.House.gov) and by the Senate on September 30, 1996(Agreed voice vote) Signed into law by President William J. Clinton on September 30, 1996
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Division C of Pub.L. 104208, 110Stat.3009-546, enacted September30, 1996 (often referred to as "i-RAI-ruh" by federal appellate law clerks, and sometimes abbreviated as "IIRAIRA" or "IIRIRA") vastly changed the immigration laws of the United States.
This act states that immigrants unlawfully present in the United States for 180 days but less than 365 days must remain outside the United States for three years unless they obtain a pardon. If they are in the United States for 365 days or more, they must stay outside the United States for ten years unless they obtain a waiver. If they return to the United States without the pardon, they may not apply for a waiver for a period of ten years.
Previously, immediate deportation was triggered only for offenses that could lead to five years or more in jail. Under the Act, minor offenses such as shoplifting may make individuals eligible for deportation. When IIRIRA was passed in 1996, it was applied retroactively to all those convicted of deportable offenses.
However, in 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that Congress did not intend IIRIRA to be applied retroactively to those who pleaded guilty to a crime prior to the enactment of IIRIRA if they would not have been deportable at the time that they pleaded guilty in (INS v. St. Cyr).
IIRIRA's mandatory detention provisions have also been repeatedly challenged, with less success.
The Reed Amendment, a portion of IIRIRA which makes people who renounced U.S. citizenship excludable from the U.S. if the Attorney General finds that they renounced for purposes of tax avoidance, has also been suggested to be unconstitutional.[1]
The IIRIRA authorized the Immigration and Naturalization Service to use "secret evidence" against aliens in various immigration proceedings if the evidence is deemed classified and the INS considers it relevant to the case. Critics have challenged the constitutionality of this provision and in 1999 and 2000 a "Secret Evidence Repeal Act" was introduced in Congress, but never passed.[2]
Deportees may be held in jail for months, even as much as two years, before being brought before an immigration board, at which defendants need to pay for their own legal representation. In 2001, the Supreme Court curtailed the Immigration Service's ability to hold deportees indefinitely in Zadvydas v. Davis.
The Act has been applied much more vigorously since 9/11. At least 1,000 British citizens were affected by the law in 2003.[citation needed]
See original here:
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility ...