Rep. Schiff Pushes for Immigration Reform and Raising the Minimum Wage on MSNBC
On Saturday, February 15, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) spoke with MSNBC #39;s T.J. Holmes about the President #39;s speech to House Democrats at their retreat, and the pu...
By: AdamSchiff
See the rest here:
Rep. Schiff Pushes for Immigration Reform and Raising the Minimum Wage on MSNBC - Video
Immigration Reform: The GOP #39;s Bogus #39;Obama-Trust-Deficit #39;
The GOP #39;s Vicious Internal War: Republican Establishment Trying To Exile Tea Partiers And Extremists: http://www.politicalarticles.net/blog/2014/02/16/the-go...
By: politicalarticles
Visit link:
Immigration Reform: The GOP's Bogus 'Obama-Trust-Deficit' - Video
Distilled to their discouraging essence, Republicans reasons for retreating from immigration reform reflect waning confidence in American culture and in the political mission only Republicans can perform restoring Americas economic vigor. Without this, the nation will have a dismal future only Democrats can relish: government growing in order to allocate scarce opportunity.
Many say addressing immigration will distract from a focus on ObamaCare. But a mature party avoids monomania, and ObamaCares defects are obvious enough that voters wont require nine more months of reminders.
Many Republicans say immigration policy divides their party. If, however, the party becomes a gaggle of veto groups enforcing unanimities, it will become what completely harmonious parties are: small.
Many Republicans see in immigrants only future Democratic votes. Yet US history tells a consistent story the party identified with prosperity, and hence opportunity, prospers.
Many Republicans have understandable cultural concerns, worrying that immigrants from this hemisphere do not experience the psychological guillotine that severed trans-Atlantic immigrants from prior allegiances. But is there data proving that American culture has lost its assimilative power? Thirty-five percent of illegal adult immigrants have been here at least 15 years, 28 percent for 10 to 14 years and only 15 percent for less than five years. Thirty-five percent own their homes. Are we sure they are resisting assimilation?
Many Republicans rightly say control of borders is an essential ingredient of national sovereignty. But net immigration from Mexico has recently been approximately zero. Border Patrol spending quadrupled in the 1990s and tripled in the 2000s. With illegal entries near a 40-year low, and a 2012 Government Accountability Office assessment that border security was then 84 percent effective, will a border surge of $30 billion more for the further militarization (actually, the East Germanization) of the 1,969 miles assuage remaining worries?
Many say President Obama cant be trusted to enforce reforms. This is no reason for not improving immigration laws that subsequent presidents will respect. Besides, the Obama administrations deportations are, if anything, excessive, made possible by post-9/11 technological and manpower resources. As The Economist tartly notes, A mass murder committed by mostly Saudi terrorists resulted in an almost limitless amount of money being made available for the deportation of Mexican house-painters.
Many say immigration runs counter to US social policies aiming to reduce the number of people with low levels of skill and education, and must further depress the wages of Americans who, at the bottom of the economic ladder, are already paying the price for todays economic anemia. This is true. But so is this: The Congressional Budget Office says an initial slight reduction of low wages (0.1 percent in a decade) will be followed by increased economic growth partly attributable to immigrants.
Immigration is the entrepreneurial act of taking the risk of uprooting oneself and plunging into uncertainty. Small wonder, then, that immigrants are about 20 percent of owners of small businesses, and that more than 40 percent of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children.
George W. Bush was the first president since Woodrow Wilson to serve two terms and leave office with the average household income lower than when he entered it. Obama may be the second when he leaves during the eighth year of a wretched recovery.
Read this article:
Participants hold hands and pray during a vigil for immigration reform in Salt Lake City, Thursday, June 27, 2013.
Ravell Call, Deseret News
Enlarge photo
WASHINGTON Wherever we were born and however we got here, workers need certain basic protections and opportunities to provide for our families and fully contribute to the American economy.
By legalizing the status and strengthening the bargaining power of immigrant workers, comprehensive immigration reform would be good for all workers, both native-born and newcomer.
Comprehensive reform means a realistic, balanced response to the presence of millions of undocumented workers in our midst. It would acknowledge the need to regain control of the immigration process while at the same time appreciating not demonizing this important segment of our labor force, whose members do some of our nations toughest jobs.
Under our current, broken immigration system, we essentially have two economies. In the regular economy most of us inhabit, workers secure in their citizenship or immigration status can fight back against egregious employer abuses unsafe working conditions, stolen pay, sexual harassment without fear of arrest and deportation. In the underground economy of the undocumented, workers must suffer in silence.
The two worlds are merging, but in the wrong direction. Workers in the open economy are losing rights and leverage, in part because of competition from the hidden economy. Wages have stagnated and opportunities for advancement been blocked. Truly comprehensive immigration reform would create one labor market that works for everyone.
Contrary to fears often stoked for political gain, immigrants dont take jobs from the native-born. Instead, several studies have found that immigrant and native employment support each other.
Untrained workers from abroad often initially take low-skill jobs that free up those already here for better-paying work: an immigrant who cleans up a construction site creates more jobs for carpenters and plumbers; a home health aid from overseas allows the adult child of an ailing parent to return to the workforce.
See the article here:
Stronger pro-union measures are needed to save existing American jobs
In this April 18, 2013 photo Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., speaks at a Capitol Hill news conference with the Senate's "Gang of Eight", the bipartisan team pushing an immigration overhaul, to outline their immigration reform legislation that would creates a path for 11 million unauthorized immigrants to apply for U.S. citizenship.
Associated Press
Enlarge photo
WASHINGTON Distilled to their discouraging essence, Republicans' reasons for retreating from immigration reform reflect waning confidence in American culture and in the political mission only Republicans can perform restoring America's economic vigor. Without this, the nation will have a dismal future only Democrats can relish: government growing in order to allocate scarce opportunity.
Many Republicans say addressing immigration will distract from a winning focus on Obamacare. But a mature party avoids monomania, and Obamacare's manifold defects are obvious enough that voters will not require nine more months of reminders.
Many Republicans say immigration policy divides their party. If, however, the party becomes a gaggle of veto groups enforcing unanimities, it will become what completely harmonious parties are: small.
Many Republicans see in immigrants only future Democratic votes. This descent into Democratic-style identity politics is unworthy of Republicans, and unrealistic. United States history tells a consistent story the party identified with prosperity, and hence opportunity, prospers.
Many Republicans have understandable cultural concerns, worrying that immigrants from this hemisphere do not experience the "psychological guillotine" that severed trans-Atlantic immigrants from prior allegiances. But is there data proving that American culture has lost its assimilative power? Thirty-five percent of illegal adult immigrants have been here at least 15 years, 28 percent for 10 to 14 years and only 15 percent for less than five years. Thirty-five percent own their homes. Are we sure they are resisting assimilation?
Many Republicans rightly say control of borders is an essential ingredient of national sovereignty. But net immigration from Mexico has recently been approximately zero. Border Patrol spending, which quadrupled in the 1990s, tripled in the 2000s. With illegal entries near a 40-year low, and a 2012 Government Accountability Office assessment that border security was then 84 percent effective, will a "border surge" of $30 billion more for the further militarization (actually, the East Germanization) of the 1,969 miles assuage remaining worries?
Many Republicans say Barack Obama cannot be trusted to enforce reforms. This is, however, no reason for not improving immigration laws that subsequent presidents will respect. Besides, the Obama administration's deportations are, if anything, excessive, made possible by post-9/11 technological and manpower resources. As The Economist tartly notes, "a mass murder committed by mostly Saudi terrorists resulted in an almost limitless amount of money being made available for the deportation of Mexican house-painters."
Read more from the original source:
George F. Will: Why immigration reform matters: Unity in the Republican Party