Rep Steve King on Split over Immigration Reform
House Speaker Boehner hits the breaks on reform Credit: Fox News: http://foxnews.com/ Please: Like, Share and Subscribe ...Thanks!!! Copyright Disclaimer Und...
By: Disillusioned
More:
Last week, John Boehner made a rather stunning turnaround on whether the House will be passing some sort of immigration reform this year. To be snide: First he was for it, before he was against it. What happened in between (one assumes) is that he tried to sell the idea to his own caucus. Who (from all appearances) wasn't buying it. While this might not be the end for immigration reform this year, the idea certainly can now be said to be on life support, at best. What this means for the future of immigration reform is anybody's guess at this point, so I thought I'd map out a few scenarios which assume immigration reform is not going to pass before this year's elections.
Republicans -- especially those in the House fighting to keep their jobs this year -- are leery of taking on immigration reform right now. The reason they've got a big advantage in the midterm elections, they think, is because their signature issue of hating Obamacare is going to be good enough to propel them to victory in the Senate. So why delve into a subject that is contentious and divisive within the Republican Party in the meantime? If you buy into the assumptions made, this reasoning makes perfect sense for House Republicans. The only problem with it is that there's always a reason not to do something this big, and this might be the only chance Republicans get before the 2016 presidential election to pass immigration reform.
Some Republican strategists are hinting that maybe -- just maybe, mind you -- Republicans will take up the issue right after the November vote. In the "lame duck" period of Congress (between the election and January, when the new Congress is sworn in), House Republicans will magically get their act together, produce legislation, and then forge some sort of compromise with the Senate so a bill can reach President Obama's desk. That's a lot to ask for in a very short period of time, of course. But what Republicans don't admit (or possibly haven't thought out yet) is that this scenario only really works if Republicans lose big in the upcoming election. If Republicans win big, why would the outgoing Congress pass something when the incoming Congress will be more heavily Republican? If the status quo holds (if neither Republicans nor Democrats win big), then Republicans will be disappointed at not winning big (which they are all currently telling themselves is inevitable) and won't have much stomach for taking on such a contentious issue. They'll be demoralized, especially if Democrats hold the Senate, and they won't be enthusiastically launching any big reform efforts. But if Republicans lose big, then they will reason that any reform efforts passed before the next Congress is sworn in will be "more Republican" -- most especially if they have lost control of the House. So they'll have a big motivator to passing something quickly, before the next Congress has a chance to act.
Looking a bit further into the future than the fantasy of the lame duck Congress quickly passing sweeping reform measures, there are essentially three or four scenarios worth considering. Sadly, for those who support immigration reform, the opportunities will shrink to pass real reform in 2015 or 2016 in all but one of these. As mentioned, it's always easy for Congress to find reasons not to act. Let's take a look at them one by one, from the most optimistic (for Democrats) to the most pessimistic (for the chances of real reform passing).
Democrats win big, take House
This rosy-tinted scenario begins with an upset at the polls. Democrats not only hold onto the Senate, but also take control of the House. Next January, the first order of business will be taking up immigration reform. Because it will be a brand-new Congress, the Senate bill which previously passed will expire. So the Senate could either pass the same bill or tweak it slightly. The House would pass their own version, and a compromise would quickly be reached. To get through the Senate again, Democrats will need a filibuster-proof 60 votes, which likely will mean some Republicans will have some influence in the final bill. So it won't be solely Democratic ideas which make it into the final legislation. But it will guarantee that whatever passes is real reform -- defined as "reform which doesn't create an impossible path for undocumented immigrants to follow." Obama, of course, will happily sign the bill into law.
Status quo wins, Congress remains split
In this scenario, the Republicans hold onto the House and the Democrats hold onto the Senate. Depending on who increases their margin in both houses, perhaps some sort of lame-duck compromise is reached, but this would be a long shot. What will likely happen is that the issue will be waiting for the new Congress in January. I should note that this scenario also works (in reverse) in the unlikely event that the Democrats take the House while the Republicans take the Senate (the longest of longshot outcomes this November).
Original post:
Jissela Centeno and her son Matthew Pineda of Arlington, Va., whose family is from Honduras, participates in a rally for immigration reform at the U.S. Capitol in Washington.
Charles Dharapak, Associated Press
Enlarge photo
Ten days ago, House Republicans put forward a series of very encouraging principles for immigration reform. This past Thursday, however, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, squashed any expectations that the House would take up the matter this year. Most Republicans do not have any objections. Rather, according to The Wall Street Journal, many balked at debating an issue that divides Republicans and feared giving the president a legislative victory in an election year.
This is short-sighted political gamesmanship, and is not worthy of our nations representatives. Prior to Thursday, the principles proposed by House Republicans were encouraging because they signaled a breakthrough in the logjam that had kept meaningful action at bay. It reflected a tone of civility and common sense that resolution of this issue demands.
Utah has long been on the forefront in calling for a compassionate and realistic approach to immigration. In 2010, a wide range of political, business, law enforcement and religious groups lined up in support of the Utah Compact, which enunciated five principles to guide the immigration debate: seeking federal solutions; focusing law enforcement on criminal activities, not civil violations of federal code; uniting rather than separating families; recognizing immigrants contributions to the economy; and adopting a humane and inclusive attitude toward immigrants.
On the national level, the Republican Party faces a challenge in broadening its appeal beyond its base among the white middle-class and cultural conservatives. Its inability to appeal to Hispanics was one significant aspect of its loss in the 2012 presidential contest. Thats why its so important for the party to act now to confront the threshold question of addressing immigration.
Until recently, progress had stalled over concerns about border security and whether efforts to grant undocumented residents legal status would amount of a grant of amnesty. Border security is important, although there is no realistic way to guarantee against all unauthorized entry to American territory. Still, Washington needs to act in good faith to secure the border.
More importantly, there must be some avenue to attain legal status for the millions of unauthorized immigrants who reside here. Arresting and deporting these productive and law-abiding individuals is neither feasible nor desirable. Nor is an indefinite state of limbo.
In a perfect world, earning the status of citizen of the United States would be more than a function of attrition. But our nation has created an imperfect system, rife with confusing procedures and randomly enforced rules. It is natural that good people, seeking better opportunities for themselves and their families and committing malice toward none would immigrate to a land of opportunity. We should welcome them.
Continued here:
In our opinion: Immigration reform is needed now, not next election cycle
What #39;s the BEST solution for immigration reform?
It #39;s not a one-size fits all solution. Noelle Nguyen talks to Jon Justice about the best solution for illegal immigration, one that most will find palatable....
By: AmericanLoveAffair
Read the rest here:
Month-long fast for immigration reform
Activists in Rochester are spending the month trying to raise support for immigration reform.
By: kimtweather
The rest is here: