Mediaboss Marketing

AUSTIN, Texas - The Internet is a way of life for billions of people but some in Washington still don't seem to get it, Mozilla CEO Gary Kovacs said on Saturday.

"If you don't understand the Internet, you don't have any place in government," he told an audience at the annual South by Southwest conference in Austin.

Given the impact of the Internet on daily life, Kovacs said, he is amazed when members of Congress express a desire to hire staffers who "understand" the Internet.

"It's not something you learn, or hire someone for. It has to be the way you live your life," he said.

Washington and the tech industry have increasingly clashed as the impact of Internet and other tech issues grows. Mozilla joined other Internet companies and organizations like Google and Wikipedia in protesting proposed anti-piracy legislation in January.

But Kovacs said through internal discussions officials Mozilla have decided to avoid wading into more political fights. "That's not our place," he said. Instead, Kovacs said Mozilla will focus more on "protecting the Web."

It is incorrect to say that Web companies drove the broad online protests that ultimately scuttled the anti-piracy bills, he argued. Web sites simply "lubricated" communications between citizens and their representatives, allowing the issue to be publicized beyond people involved in technology policy.

"We enabled 30 million people to take action," Kovacs said. "Thirty million people are not nerds. Thirty million people are citizens."

Tech activists and companies are flexing their newfound lobbying muscles at the conference, but members of several different panels on the anti-piracy debate said many issues complicate efforts to harness that power again.

Major websites took unprecedented actions during piracy protestsbut Tumblr vice president Andrew McLaughlin said he doesn't expect to see a wave of more politically active web companies. Instead, concerned techies should become involved as basic citizens, he said.

Continued here:
Mozilla CEO: Don't Understand The Internet? Get Out Of Government

Americans are using online search engines, especially Google, more than ever before, but an increasing number worry that the tracking of their online activities is an invasion of privacy, according to a new study released Friday.

The Pew Internet & American Life Project found that 73 percent of users said they would not be OK with an online search engine keeping track of their queries even if the data provides personalized results in the future.

And 68 percent said they were not OK with targeted advertising because they don't want their online activities tracked and analyzed.

The report could bolster criticism by consumer groups and government officials over the online privacy policies of companies such as Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Facebook. President Obama has proposed a "privacy bill of rights" to give consumers control over how their data is collected, stored and shared.

"Search engines are increasingly important to people in their navigation of information spaces, but users are generally uncomfortable with the idea of their search histories being used to target information to them," said Kristen Purcell, author of the report "Search Engine Use 2012."

"A clear majority of searchers say that they feel that search engines keeping track of search history is an invasion of privacy, and they also worry about their search results being limited to what's deemed relevant to them," Purcell said in a news release.

The research was based on a survey of 2,253 adults between Jan. 20 and Feb. 19, with a margin of error of plus or minus two percentage points.

The study said 73 percent of all Americans use a search engine, compared with 52 percent in 2002.

And 59 percent of online Americans use a search engine on any given day, nearly double the number who did so in 2004. The vast majority - 91 percent - said they "always or most of the time" found the information they wanted using search engines.

Google remained the most popular search engine. About 83 percent used Google most often, compared with 6 percent who cited Yahoo. Eight years ago, 47 percent picked Google, and 26 percent chose Yahoo.

Continued here:
Internet privacy a growing concern, Pew finds

RESTON, VA--(Marketwire -03/08/12)- Nearly six million domain names were added to the Internet in the fourth quarter of 2011, bringing the total number of registered domain names to more than 225 million worldwide across all domains, according to the latest Domain Name Industry Brief, published by VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN - News), the trusted provider of Internet infrastructure services for the networked world.

The increase of 5.9 million domain names equates to a growth rate of 2.7 percent over the third quarter of 2011, and marks the fourth straight quarter with greater than 2 percent growth. Registrations have grown by more than 20.4 million, or 10 percent, since the fourth quarter of 2010.

The .com and .net Top Level Domains (TLDs) experienced aggregate growth in the fourth quarter, reaching a combined total of 113.8 million names. This represents approximately a 2 percent increase in the base over the third quarter of 2011 and an 8 percent increase over the same quarter in 2010. New .com and .net registrations totaled 7.9 million during the quarter. This is a 4 percent increase year-over-year in new registrations. The .com/.net renewal rate for the fourth quarter was 73.5 percent, up from 73.3 percent for the third quarter.

Verisign's average daily Domain Name System (DNS) query load during the quarter was 64 billion, with a peak of 117 billion. Compared to the previous quarter, the daily average increased 8 percent and the peak grew 51 percent.

Domain Name Hijacking - A Serious but Manageable ThreatThe latest issue of the Domain Name Industry Brief focuses on "domain name hijacking," in which perpetrators fraudulently transfer domain names by password theft or social engineering. As defined by security experts, domain name hijacking occurs when an attacker falsifies the registration data for a domain name, transferring that name away from its rightful registrant and gaining full administrative and operational control over the domain.

The brief analyzes how attackers use a wide range of techniques to hijack domain names, from spyware and keystroke loggers to "social engineering," in which scammers impersonate registrants, registrars, or other entities in the chain of trust in order to gain access to passwords and personal information.

Regardless of the technique used, the end-result for registrants is often severe. Once an attacker has full control of a domain name, they have free reign to use it for any number of nefarious purposes, from creating their own scam websites, to hosting illegal and dangerous content, to extorting the original owner.

While the danger of domain name hijacking is significant, it is a threat that can be significantly reduced with proper planning and mitigation techniques, such as:

Verisign publishes the Domain Name Industry Brief to provide Internet users throughout the world with significant statistical and analytical research and data on the domain name industry and the Internet as a whole. Copies of the 2011 fourth quarter Domain Name Industry Brief, as well as previous reports, can be obtained at: http://www.verisigninc.com/DNIB.

About Verisign VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN - News) is the trusted provider of Internet infrastructure services for the networked world. Billions of times each day, Verisign helps companies and consumers all over the world connect between the dots. Additional news and information about the company is available at http://www.verisigninc.com.

See the article here:
Internet Grows to More Than 225 Million Domain Names in the Fourth Quarter of 2011

When news broke that regulators had approved the Comcast/NBCU mega-merger in January 2011, I was at the annual State of the Net meeting on Capitol Hill. I missed most of the conference to hole up in my hotel room and write about the deal; the monster transaction would have more impact on the state of internet access in America than any panel discussion at the conference.

Heres why: With the addition of control over NBCUs wildly profitable cable channels (and NBC sports programming) to its existing commanding lead in territory for the provision of high-speed internet access, Comcast can make it just too expensive for any private-sector wired competitor to show up as a cheaper distributor of information, entertainment, data, and voice services.

High-speed internet is the stuff of modern life and the infrastructure America needs to thrive as a global competitor. But many of Americas great cities are now Comcast country when it comes to wired high-speed internet access. (And if youre not in Comcast country, youre probably in Time Warner or Cablevision country these companies dont enter each others territories.) The consumers bank account is suffering and were lagging as a nation, but Comcast is doing well.

Last December, the other shoe dropped: Verizon Wireless and Comcast agreed to market each others services. Verizon waved a white flag, implicitly agreeing not to compete with Comcast on the wired side of high-speed internet access by recognizing that the moat around Comcasts (and Time Warners) business was just too wide to cross. (As a practical matter, only Verizons FiOS can compete with Comcasts DOCSIS 3.0 services, but in 85% of Comcasts footprint there are no FiOS services. Because its too expensive to rip out copper and install fiber, Verizon isnt going to expand, leaving Comcast customers with no choice.)

The prospects Comcast are targeting with Internet Essentials arent customers it wants in the long run; the program, in a sense, filters out people who cant pay by readying them to pay later.

Comcast was also implicitly agreeing not to build its own wireless facilities, making Verizon Wirelesss business plans more certain.

And so the private providers of internet access in America are dividing the market you take wired, Ill take wireless which is all to the good for their shareholders, but not so great for the rest of us.

Now that it faces no competition from other private wired providers and is conceding that wireless was always a complementary service not a substitute for its wires even Comcast has to be just slightly worried that someone will notice that it is selling an essential commodity with zero oversight. Its as if a single company was providing water or electricity in your town and could choose whom to serve and how much to charge not something most Americans would think was a good idea.

Read the original here:
Water, Internet Access and Swagger: These Guys Are Good

Teen Internet addiction can predict past or present drug abuse. (Credit: Thinkstock/Getty Images)

Parents already panicky about the amount of time their teenage children spend online may now have something new to worry about: All those hours spent Web surfing, chatting, gaming, texting and posting to Facebook could be a warning sign of substance abuse, according to a new study in the March issue of the Journal of Addiction Medicine.

Greek researchers found that teenagers with pathologic Internet use were more likely to admit to drug abuse, and as excessive Internet use increased, so did the likelihood of substance abuse. The study also linked substance abuse and excessive Internet use to such personality traits as nonconformity, aggressiveness, recklessness and impulsiveness.

Not only did we find that specific personality attributes were important in both substance abuse and Internet addiction, but that Internet addiction remained an important predictor of substance abuse, study co-author Georgios Floros, at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, said in an email to ABCNews.com.

Floros and colleagues surveyed 1,271 students between the ages of 14 and 19 on the Aegean island of Kos about their Internet use, substance use and personality. To determine who was Internet addicted, the researchersadministereda 20-question Internet addiction test that asked how often the students stayed online longer than theyd intended, how often their grades or studiesslipped because of the amount of line spent online, how often theyd yell, snap or act annoyed if someone bothered them while they were online.

When they compared the mean values of illicit substance abuse among the teenage participants, the researchers found that those who reported substance abuse had significantly higher mean scores on the Internet addiction test, and that those scores were important predictors for substance use, either past or present.

The predictive element showed an interesting new finding, said Floros.

Its not a shocking result to me, David Greenfield, a Connecticut psychologist and founder of the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction, told ABCNews.com. The study offers another set of variables to look at when doing a workup.

Dr. Megan Moreno, a pediatric and adolescent medicine specialist at UW Health in Madison, Wis., said, Ive definitely seen kids who showed signs of problematic Internet use. Some of them do go on to have other problem behaviors. Sometimes thats substance abuse, sometimes its other addictive behaviors, like excess exercise or excess shopping.

Parents might wonder when they should start to worry about their Internet addict kids. At what point does mere gadget fixation morph into something more pathologic or addictive?And what is pathologic Internet use?

See the original post:
Internet Addiction Linked to Drug Abuse