Mediaboss Marketing

Google Analytics 4 hasnt exactly got off to the best start with marketers.

In fact, its getting pretty awkward some advertisers are so disappointed with the new program that theyve even beenhosting funeralsfor its predecessor, Universal Analytics.

But what is it about GA4 thats got the world of digital marketing so riled up?

We recently asked our readers in a GA4 readiness poll what problems they were facing. Heres a list of the most common complaints.

GA4s user interface was hands-down the biggest issue our readers reported. The UI was described as slow, laughable and a few other adjectives were opting not to publish.

Independent sales and marketing contractor, John Erikson, told us:

When on selecting segments/dimensions in GA4, instead of the ability in Universal to select/deselect one or more segments in a single list and click apply, you have to open customization or add comparison, click add filter, select a dimension from a long dropdown, then select dimension value from another dropdown, then apply (and you can only select one).

Granted it is only a few seconds difference, but when you look at many different patterns every day, it becomes frustrating to repeat those excess UI moves over and over when you used to do it faster.

That same dropdown structure is used in creating/editing GA4 reports. The dropdown lists are long and it is hard to find what you are looking for.You can type in partial names and more quickly find them once you know them, but initially it is very hard to scroll through them all and find what you want.

Also, you can only select one so it is hard to look at multiple dimensions/values. I dont know the answer to fixing this, but I do find it clumsy to use.

Another major concern for marketers has been the delay of same day data on GA4.

Advertisers have stressed that they need the ability to monitor performance constantly and are confused as to why the new analytics platform doesnt appear to have this function.

Ron Weber, Sr Director at Actian, explained:

The data latency is a joke, taking 12-24 hours to report on what is happening prevents this from being an actionable tool.

I wish I wasnt backlogged for the past few years and thus could/would have realized this before.

Maybe Google will just move the computing power from UA -> GA4 so that this will change? [praying]!

Marketers raised concerns about discrepancies on GA4 too. Differences in information had resulted in some worrying that the data being served therefore couldnt possibly be accurate, resulting in people questioning if they can trust GA4.

One marketer, who wished to remain anonymous, told us:

What I find problematic is the discrepancy between GA4 API and the respective Looker Studio Connector. Dimensions that are present in the API and even per default in the GA4 reporting interface are apparently missing in the Looker Studio connector, e.g. Landing Page dimension.

The Google Team seems to work on that, because at least the landing page dimension is now present. But that also means that I have to minus two days before UA data collection comes to an end then adjust and check my numerous reports again and again.

I am as ready as the tool is, but I certainly do not look forward to working solely with GA4. I am also thinking about looking foralternative tools to GA4.

Marketers across the board have been reporting that GA4 is incredibly difficult to use. Even seasoned advertisers are finding it challenging trying to navigate their way around the new platform.

SEO and marketing consultant Jason McDonald told us:

GA4 is a disaster. It is so much harder to use than UA, and completely non-intuitive.

It is nearly impossible to drill down by clicking as was possible than UA.

It is the Windows Vista of Google Analytics, and all the cognoscenti are afraid to say publicly that it is garbage. But everyone knows it is garbage.

With so many marketers struggling as they try to figure out GA4, many are questioning why Google hasnt provided more educational resources explaining how the new tool works.

The marketing team at Storis told us:

I found most of the answers that I was stuck on from taking private courses through SMX or finally getting to a knowledgeable Google team member.

Their documentation really lacked especially where there were major functional changes or gaps. I kept trying to figure out how to replicate things that werent brought over.

Also, many of the people on Googles own team arent up to speed making support calls confusing.

Some advertisers explained that marketing doesnt wear a one size fits all hat. While some of the more complex settings may suit some, other professionals, such as bloggers, would just like access to basic tools on GA4 and are wasting time and money trying to understand features they dont need to use.

Eb Gargano from Productive Blogging told us:

One of the things I have observed is that many bloggers and online businesses have been totally losing their minds over GA4 wasting days (and in some cases weeks) stressing over this, when their time could have been much better spent elsewhere.

The truth is most bloggers and online businesses need only a simple setup and an understanding of the basic reports. But no one is saying that, and online business owners are being scared into believing they need to spend lots of money on expensive courses and a lot of time creating multiple custom reports.

I think its a real shame there isnt a GA4 Lite for users who only need basic data.

Another common complaint from marketers responding to our poll was the lack of features GA4 has to offer in comparison to Universal Analytics.

Marketers seemed particularly bothered by the removal of attribution features.

Elizabeth Rule, account manager and local SEO analyst for Sterling Sky, told us:

Ive been using GA4 as much as possible the past month to get used to it, but honestly it just feels like a clunkier version of GA3 with fewer features that I actually want to use.

I find myself wanting to go back to GA3 every time I use GA4 and its not because Im just too used to it. Some of the features I use every day are missing or extremely complicated to find in GA4.

Clients and marketers alike have desperately been trying to recreate reports in GA4 that they previously relied upon when using Universal Analytics.

Unfortunately, it seems for many that this task has proved far more difficult than it should have been.

Tom Demers, co-founder and managing partner of SEO and PPC agency Measured SEM, told us:

Clients are frustrated with recreating their existing reports in GA4, particularly for specific edge cases, recreating dashboards in third-party reporting tools including Looker Studio.

There is also a lot of work around recreating events / goals within GA4 (and confusion around not seeing those events in certain reports).

Marketers also complained that they were struggling to simply create reports in GA4 an issue that didnt impact them when they were working with UA.

According to many marketers who took part in our poll, Google has made many unnecessary changes when it comes to building reports, making their workload more difficult.

Eric Bushaw, search engine optimization manager at G5, told us:

In time, I think GA4 will enable greater insights than UA did.

With that said, some of the seemingly arbitrary changes to how reporting can be done are frustrating.

Eliminating views, restrictions around how custom segments can be used, and other seemingly unnecessary changes are going to make life difficult for us once UA is really gone.

Several marketers contacted Search Engine Land to report bugs within GA4, claiming many features werent working as intended. Issues being flagged included syncing issues with Looker Studio Dashboard and AMP new script not working.

SEO consultantJohn McAlpintold us:

The platform still has a lot of bugs, and we find ourselves spending more time figuring out why attribution is not properly labeled and why the data is inconsistent.

Dig deeper: Find our GA4 coverage here

Marketers have found the enforced migration from Universal Analytics to GA4 tough, so it can be reassuring to know this challenge is being felt across the industry.

But regardless of how difficult the adjustment has been, search marketing expert Kayle Larkin told us its important that marketers get on board with Googles latest analytics program as it will likely be around for a long time. She said:

Theres an age-old saying that the grass isnt always greener on the other side.

People use the internet in completely different ways than in 2012, and I see GA4 as Googles answer for future-proofing website analytics.The industry needs a free option.

Marketers need to pause for a moment and think about what information is really useful and helpful what they need to know.

Himanshu Sharmasaid it well on LinkedIn: It is important to remember that we are not in the business of data retrieval. We are in the business of data analysis to improve ROI.'

Either way, you need to understand your data and how that supports your marketing initiatives.

Larkin went on to explain that change within any platform and any industry can cause people to panic. But as time passes, confidence and familiarity increases, causing attitudes to change. She concluded:

Everyone was mad when Facebook updated their interface and couldnt find anything. It was horrible and the end of Facebook.'

Because we use Facebook daily, that was quickly forgotten, and no one even remembers what the old interface looked like.

The response to the GA4s interface you see the same reaction when any platform changes its interface. People do not like change.

But GA4 is so customizable, and with LookerStudio there are a lot of options for getting the reports to visualize information and insights in a meaningful way.

Get MarTech! Daily. Free. In your inbox.

View original post here:
10 things you hate about Google Analytics 4 - MarTech

Production Perig - stock.adobe.com

There are nearly 1 million health care companies in the U.S., making this industry a competitive marketplace where consumers have the advantage. And top of mind for health care consumers is accessibility, convenience, and a heightened patient experience.

Digital marketing can help health care companies and providers stay ahead of the competition and engage, educate, and influence consumers by using effective strategies that target a core audience through digital platforms like social media channels, user-friendly apps, and a company's website.Digital marketing can have a significant impact on the practices of primary care physicians, as a solid online presence can engage existing patients and attract new ones.

Summer Craig, MA Craig Group

It also allows health care providers to engage with patients on a more personal level. They can access information about their health conditions and treatment options from anywhere at any time using their smartphones or computers. This increased accessibility leads to better patient engagement and satisfaction and has been shown to improve patient outcomes.

By targeting specific patient populations, health care companies can tailor their marketing messages and services to better meet their needs.They can increase their revenue by attracting more patients who are interested in their services, leading to higher profitability and growth. Compared to traditional forms of advertising, like billboards or TV ads that require a significant investment, digital marketing is relatively inexpensive yet highly effective.

The pandemic has pushed the need for digital marketing, as it's put a spotlight on health care accessibility, with more consumers turning to digital platforms to get their medical information, schedule appointments, learn about a practice's service line offerings, and even receive virtual care. It's similar to consumers purchasing goods online. They want their transactions to be fast, knowledgeable, and user-friendly and that's what patients seek in their health care providers.

With increased health care competition and more consumers turning to digital platforms to get their medical information, whether online or user-friendly apps, it's more important than ever that health care leaders look at how digital health care strategies can help them reach their business goals.

Here, we'll break down those forms of digital marketing that can help health care providers engage and target prospective patients and how to use those specific tools.

Considering that 80% of consumers have used the internet for health care-related researchand that 63% of respondents will choose a provider due to a strong online presence, online visibility is crucial for health care organizations to attract potential patients.

The good news is that with some simple, focused tactics, you can make a significant difference in your digital marketing efforts:

Targeted advertising can be very effective, but providers need to consider marketing compliance with the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). This means you can share general information about a practice, service line offerings, products, etc. Still, you can only mention a patient by name or disclose identifying information in your marketing materials only if they have signed HIPAA consent documents.

Simple yet important measures should also be taken when developing marketing materials that highlight a practice. For example, be aware of the photos you take of your office. Are there patients who are visible in the pictures? Can you read the name on the vial that a doctor is holding? Any patient-specific information that is used and not approved first by the patient means you are not in compliance with HIPAA regulations.

The best thing you can do to protect your practice and your patients is to retain a HIPAA-compliant digital marketing partner who can help guide you. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services provides excellent information on HIPAA Privacy Rule and marketing.

While these rules can intimidate a health care organization from utilizing targeted marketing, when done correctly, it allows for focused marketing efforts on the groups of people who are more likely to need specific services or products. This can help to avoid wasting resources marketing to individuals that are unlikely to be seeking help for the advertised health care services.

Social media marketing has emerged as a powerful tool for reaching and engaging with potential patients. Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram offer ample opportunities for health care providers to share their expertise and educate people on various health issues.

For instance, a dermatologist can share tips on skin care routines, recommend their preferred precautions for sunburn, and encourage people to visit their clinic for a skin check-up. By sharing content that is relevant and engaging such as seasonal health messages or the latest innovations and studies health care providers can establish themselves as thought leaders and foster trust with existing and potential patients.

Moreover, social media marketing allows health care providers to use targeted advertising to reach specific patient demographics. For instance, a fertility clinic can target its ads toward women aged 24-35 who are trying to conceive. This helps ensure that the content reaches the people most likely to benefit from those services.

Whether through educational videos, blog posts, or interactive social media campaigns, health care providers who maximize their social media presence can build a robust online presence that attracts new patients and helps retain existing ones.

Email marketing has emerged as a powerful tool for keeping patients informed about their appointments and new services offered by a practice. Texting has also become a preferred means of communication for appointment reminders, scheduling, and follow-up surveys. By sending personalized emails or even text messages, health care providers can improve the patient care experience and keep patients loyal to the practice or organization.

For example, a pediatrician can use text messaging to send reminders to parents of upcoming appointments for their children and ask about their care for opportunities to improve their next visit.

Similarly, at the hospital level, the organization can use email marketing to inform patients of new procedures, technologies, or treatments they offer. As these updates are typically less frequent, regular communications for timely wellness or service-line specific information, such as tips on nutritional kid-friendly lunch ideas for back to school, or fun developmental activities by age. With additional customization by audience, such as by age group, emails can be tailored to the patient's specific needs to increase patient engagement.

Search engine optimization (SEO) is an effective digital marketing strategy for health care providers to increase their online visibility and attract potential patients. By optimizing their website with keywords related to their areas of expertise, health care providers can improve their search engine rankings and appear higher on search engine results pages.

For example, an orthopedic surgeon may optimize their website for the keyword "knee replacement surgery," so they appear at the top of search engine results for that keyword. This means that when someone searches for "knee replacement surgery," the orthopedic surgeon's website is more likely to appear at the top of the search engine, making it easier for potential patients to find them.

Other SEO tactics involve backlinking strategies to acquire other websites to link to your practice's website. This improves the health care facility's authority and credibility, which ultimately helps to improve the search engine ranking of its website.

Not only does SEO improve a health care provider's online visibility, but it also helps to attract patients who are specifically looking for the services they provide. This ensures health care providers can attract highly targeted website traffic, which is more likely to convert into new patients.

Moreover, SEO is a long-term digital marketing strategy that pays dividends over a more extended period. By continuously optimizing their website, health care providers can maintain their high rankings in search engine results, staying ahead of their competitors and attracting more patients over time.

Pay-per-click (PPC) advertising, where advertisers pay search engine platforms such as Google or Bing to showcase their ads at the top of search results pages, is a nonorganic way to improve SEO that can pay big dividends.

For medical facilities, PPC advertising can be an effective way to increase website visitors by targeting people searching for keywords related to the facility's services. This marketing tactic can yield immediate results as PPC campaigns generate traffic immediately after launch.

For example, if a facility offers therapy for anxiety and depression, it can create a PPC campaign targeting people searching for "anxiety treatment near me" or "depression therapy." By doing this, the facility can showcase customized ads focusing on its expertise in treating anxiety and depression.

Digital marketing has become an essential tool for health care providers. Its primary goal is to improve patient engagement and increase visibility, which ultimately leads to a boosted revenue stream. To achieve this, health care providers can utilize multiple strategies and combine different digital marketing techniques to enhance overall performance metrics across the board.

Summer Craig, MA, is founder and president of Craig Group, a technology-enabled sales and marketing advisory firm specializing in revenue growth for middle-market, private-equity-backed portfolio companies. She brings a revenue-focused perspective to marketing, with experience leading marketing and digital operations teams responsible for media investments of $100MM+. Before founding Craig Group, she held significant roles with GSD&M, Zenith Optimedia, Travelocity, HomeAway.com, and Gulf States Toyota.

The rest is here:
Leveraging the power of digital marketing in health care - Medical Economics

Production Perig - stock.adobe.com

The first electronic medical record (EMR) was developed in 1972 by the Regenstreif Institute and was viewed as a major advancement in medical practice.

Electronic records evolved beyond capturing patient history to a more comprehensive view of a patients health and now are known as electronic health records (EHRs). They were seen as a critical tool to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical care such that legislation was introduced to encourage their adoption. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, a component of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), provided incentives and disincentives that led to wide-scale adoption and use of EHRs.

As of 2021,88% of office-based physicians and essentially all acute-care hospitals were using EHRs. U.S. EHR expenditures grew an average of 5.4% annually from 2015 to 2019, totaling $14.5 billion in 2019. And spending growth is forecast to reach $19.9 billion in 2024, $9.9 billion of that for hospital EHRs.

Yet, EHRs are a source of growing frustration in several areas. One concern is the burden they have created for clinicians. In a Stanford Medicine poll, 71% of physicians reported that EHRs contribute to burnout, and 59% think EHRs need a complete overhaul. Moreover, clinician burnout already costs the U.S. health care system more than$4.6 billion annually. In 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released an overarching strategy to reduce clinician burden associated with entering information into EHRs, meeting regulatory requirements and improving EHR ease of use.

Over the decades, health care organizations have invested heavily in technology that has not delivered its full expected value, making the current environment ripe for change. Health systems, hospitals, and providers are all challenged by five common pain points EHRs create. As organizations look ahead, there are proven approaches to addressing these pain points.

High costs with questionable returns

As evidenced by the historical and projected growth in EHR expenditures noted above, health care providers have invested billions in them along with countless hours, encouraged by federal policies and regulations, yet realizing real return on their investment remains a challenge.

Many health care organizations feel intimidated by the time, effort and money needed to complete an EHR conversion. Narrowing margins following the COVID-19 pandemic have forced them to carefully weigh the value of every health IT dollar spent. While many recognize the potential of EHRs to improve clinical and financial outcomes, the current transaction-based EHR models often fail to accomplish those goals.

An alternative is a system-as-a-service (SYaaS) subscription model that includes all hardware, software, and ongoing support services. This approach centralizes all implementation, optimization, and system monitoring services to manage reliability and performance.

Health systems using a SYaaS model have a predictable cost that includes all current and future interfaces and continuous IT and implementation training support, reducing labor costs and significantly lowering the total cost of ownership. With ongoing IT support and lower overall costs, health care organizations can focus on optimizing care processes and workflows to achieve improved clinical and financial outcomes.

Interoperability challenges

Interoperability is at the heart of much of the frustration with EHRs, from the inability to easily share patient data to suspected data blocking. Its a problem that makes day-to-day life for clinicians harder. Seven out of 10 PCPs (67%) think solving interoperability deficiencies should be the top priority for EHRs in the next decade, according to a Stanford Medicine poll.

Many initiatives seek to tackle the issue. The U.S. government has been instrumental in pushing for advancement through several initiatives.

Recently, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) released a notice of proposed rulemaking, Health Data,Technology, and Interoperability: Certification Program Updates, Algorithm Transparency, and Information Sharing.

This rule seeks to build upon progress made through the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) and other initiatives to support patients and providers across the care continuum. It includes proposals for electronic movement of health information, new data exchange standards, electronic case reporting for both public health and emergency responses, and algorithm transparency for certified technology.

Health systems have options for EHRs that embrace interoperability standards, but EHRs need to do more than just keep pace with advancing standards, such as the Fast Health Care Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Application Programming Interface (API). They also need an adaptable and scalable database to incorporate workflows and functionality that enable organizations to integrate care processes across all care settings, making care more efficient and reducing the burden on clinicians.

Clinician burnout

The key reason that EHRs are named as a contributor to clinician burnout is time. Clinicians express frustration that they spendnearly twice as much timedoing manual, EHR-related tasks as they spend with patients. Hospital-based physicians reported spending 37 minutes on behalf of each patient 25 of which was spent in the EHR, according to a Stanford Medicine poll. And, by some estimates,75% of health care workers may leave the profession by 2025, making it more urgent for health care organizations to seek higher performing solutions.

A recent JAMA Network editorial states that clinicians are burdened with EHRs that prioritize administrative, financial, and regulatory needs over clinical workflow. Clinicians and their patients, it says, deserve a patient-centered, technology-enhanced health care ecosystem that is designed to significantly improve outcomes at a lower cost.

When EHRs take a human-centered, clinician-first design approach, offering intuitive workflows and a seamless user interface, the EHR can stop being the focus of clinicians days, and instead support them as they provide care to patients, with documentation resulting as a natural by-product of patient care interactions.

For example, with human-centered design and advanced integrations, nurses working with monitored patients report saving as much as 15 to 20 minutes per patient per shift. Its just one example of how giving clinicians measurable efficiency gains can have a material, positive impact that reduces burnout.

Lack of reliability and downtime

The news is full of headlines about health care organizations experiencing system unavailability, increasingly due to cyberattacks. In 2022, U.S. health care organizations suffered an average of 1,410 weekly cyberattacks per organization, up 86% from 2021.

But cyberattacks are just one cause. Most EHRs require planned downtime for system maintenance and upgrades. And almost all organizations, 96% in one study, reported at least one unplanned EHR system downtime, while another study found that 70% of organizations experienced at least one unplanned downtime lasting eight hours or more.

In response to the growing threat, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently released its Hospital Cyber Resiliency Initiative Landscape Analysis and new resources for health care organizations intended to help improve cybersecurity. EHRs built upon modern foundational architectures that focus on security and reliability, such as those designed to meet stringent U.S. government security requirements, can deliver the performance and data protection health systems require, while eliminating both scheduled and unscheduled downtime.

Long implementation times

Because of their inherent complexity, EHR implementation projects for hospitals are a heavy lift for staff across the organization and often require a year or more to complete. The implementation involves a wide range of areas, including clinical functions, billing processes, regulatory compliance, quality measuring tools, and more. The time and resources required to replace an EHR hinders many organizations from considering a change, even if their current system doesnt meet their needs.

An implementation alternative that emphasizes a partnership approach and includes required resources can accelerate the implementation timeline while alleviating the burden on facility resources, resulting in a successful implementation with high user adoption and satisfaction.

For example, in the inpatient environment, the implementation process should ensure that hospitals do not have to decrease patient census during go-live, thus preventing a reduction in productivity and lost revenue. In addition, the implementation process should not require the organization to add staff, but include experienced resources that extend their team, taking responsibility for building, maintaining, training, optimizing everything needed to deliver an effective implementation.

With dedicated subject matter experts tasked with tailoring the EHR to the organizations policies, procedures, and workflows implementations can be completed in months rather than years. For example, a large national health system brought 36 hospitals live on a new EHR in just 18 months at a pace of two hospitals each month.

Disrupting the status quo

With health care organizations heavy investments in EHRs, its possible for them to realize more return on those investments. Its time for disruption from EHRs that use proven technology to make costs reasonable and predictable, shorten the time to value, leverage interoperability while improving security and reliability, and focus on making work easier for clinicians.

Ultimately, this will shift the focus to clinician wellness and bringing the joy back to their work while enabling organizations to achieve better clinical and financial outcomes.

Holly Urban is vice president of clinical product design for CliniComp.

See more here:
It's time to expect more from EHRs - Medical Economics

Adebukola Ajao is an online digital marketing guru equipped to help small businesses with the tools to compete.

A 2021 graduate of Northeastern, Ajao was recently honored with a Women Who Empower Innovator Award in the young graduate alumnae category for her creation of For All Things Digital.

Born and raised in Boston, Ajao grew up across the street from Northeasterns campus. As an undergraduate student, she worked with the universitys John D. OBryant African American Institute to start a social justice activist coalition.

During that time, she also started BDY Consult, an online marketing company. But she quickly realized she needed to further her education if she wanted to grow her business. So she applied to Northeasterns graduate program in digital marketing. She was accepted and received a scholarship.

That program allowed Ajao to combine her passion for marketing and helping underserved Black-owned businesses.

During my time as a business owner, as a student, I also wanted to leverage my digital marketing knowledge to impact Black lives, Ajao says.

Ajao is currently balancing three jobs. During the day, she works at Brookline High School as a project manager, helping students explore their entrepreneurial opportunities and secure college scholarships.

At night, she works as an adjunct professor at Northeastern, teaching in the same program she earned a degree from.

In between, Ajao works on her business. She has a team of six people located all over the country. BDY Consult works to help small business owners see themselves as marketers.

My slogan is, if youre in business, marketing is your business, Ajao says. Its essential for every small business owner to have a working, walking knowledge of marketing at all times.

The internet provides boundless opportunities to grow a business, Ajao says. Even brick-and-mortar businesses are digital. What a business does online shadows what it does in person, she says. Having an online presence allows people from around the world to touch a business.

BDY Consult, unlike larger online companies, helps clients build a business concept from the ground upfrom brainstorming a name to registering the company to even legal paperwork.

Once the foundations are in place, BDY Consult helps build a marketing campaign, social media and personal relationships.

In seven years, Ajao has had about 150 clients. Her projects range from one-offs to regular work for long-term clients. The Women Who Empower grant will help Ajao expand her business and take her marketing campaigns to the next level.

Working with small business owners can be limiting, but very rewarding, Ajao says. Small businesses often cant afford a marketing team. That is why she started a platform with free tips to help them find grants to support their efforts.

I fundamentally believe that to create an equitable, accessible world, small-business owners, especially from disadvantaged communities, need the tools, capital, funding and support to even be able to compete, Ajao says. Its not a good level playing field if people dont have that.

Beth Treffeisen is a Northeastern Global News reporter. Email her at b.treffeisen@northeastern.edu. Follow her on Twitter @beth_treffeisen.

Read more:
Digital Marketing Expert Empowers Small Business Owners - Northeastern University

Google Analytics 4 hasnt exactly got off to the best start with marketers.

In fact, its getting pretty awkward some advertisers are so disappointed with the new program that theyve even been hosting funerals for its predecessor, Universal Analytics.

But what is it about GA4 thats got the world of digital marketing so riled up?

We decided to ask our readers in a GA4 readiness poll to find out. Below, weve put together a list of the most common complaints. Let us know if you and your team can relate

GA4s user interface was hands-down the biggest issue our readers reported.

The UI was described as slow, laughable and a few other adjectives were opting not to publish.

Independent sales and marketing contractor, John Erikson, told us:

Another major concern for marketers has been the delay of same day data on GA4.

Advertisers have stressed that they need the ability to monitor performance constantly and are confused as to why the new analytics platform doesnt appear to have this function.

Ron Weber, Sr Director at Actian, explained:

Marketers raised concerns about discrepancies on GA4 too.

Differences in information had resulted in some worrying that the data being served therefore couldnt possibly be accurate, resulting in people questioning if they can trust GA4.

Sabine Walton, Senior SEO Manager at Handlerbund Marketplace, told us:

Marketers across the board have been reporting that GA4 is incredibly difficult to use.

Even seasoned advertisers are finding it challenging trying to navigate their way around the new platform.

SEO and marketing consultant Jason McDonald told Search Engine Land:

With so many marketers struggling as they try to figure out GA4, many are questioning why Google hasnt provided more educational resources explaining how the new tool works.

The marketing team at Storis told us:

Some advertisers explained that marketing doesnt wear a one size fits all hat.

While some of the more complex settings may suit some, other professionals, such as bloggers, would just like access to basic tools on GA4 and are wasting time and money trying to understand features they dont need to use.

Eb Gargano from Productive Blogging told us:

Another common complaint from marketers responding to our poll was the lack of features GA4 has to offer in comparison to Universal Analytics.

Marketers seemed particularly bothered by the removal of attribution features.

Elizabeth Rule, account manager and local SEO analyst for Sterling Sky, told us:

Get the daily newsletter search marketers rely on.

Clients and marketers alike have desperately been trying to recreate reports in GA4 that they previously relied upon when using Universal Analytics.

Unfortunately, it seems for many that this task has proved far more difficult than it should have been.

Tom Demers, co-founder and managing partner of SEO and PPC agency Measured SEM, told us:

Marketers also complained that they were struggling to simply create reports in GA4 an issue that didn't impact them when they were working with UA.

According to many marketers who took part in our poll, Google has made many unnecessary changes when it comes to building reports, making their workload more difficult.

Eric Bushaw, search engine optimization manager at G5, told us:

Several marketers contacted Search Engine Land to report bugs within GA4, claiming many features weren't working as intended. Issues being flagged included syncing issues with Looker Studio Dashboard and AMP new script not working.

SEO consultant John McAlpin told us:

Marketers have found the enforced migration from Universal Analytics to GA4 tough, so it can be reassuring to know this challenge is being felt across the industry.

But regardless of how difficult the adjustment has been, search marketing expert and SMX Advanced speaker Kayle Larkin told Search Engine Land it's important marketers get on board with Google's latest analytics program as it will likely be around for a long time. She said:

Larkin went on to explain that change within any platform and any industry can cause people to panic. But as time passes, confidence and familiarity increases, causing attitudes to change. She concluded:

If you're struggling to navigate GA4, why not sign up for a GA4 training course?

Alternatively, for free information and resources on how to use GA4, read the Google Analytics 4 account training guide and support guide

Read the original post:
10 things we hate about Google Analytics 4 - Search Engine Land