Mediaboss Marketing

In the last few years, the canning world has been rocked by a combination of supply-chain shortages and a massive uptick in the number of people interested in home food preservation. The result, predictably, has been shortages of supplies, notably lids. Ive canned for decades, but always in the back of my mind was a concern: What if I ran out of canning lids? What if none were available at the store? Can disposable canning lids be reused?

Ive had some success with scalding and reusing disposable lids, but it goes without saying this tactic is not recommended. Disposable lids are manufactured for single use only, and going against manufacturer recommendations is just inviting failure.

Most canners are familiar with the disposable lids put out by Ball or Kerr. However, there are now alternatives on the market well worth considering, including reusable lids. This article compares four kinds of lids: Two brands of disposable (Ball/Kerr, Superb) and two reusable (Tattler, Harvest Guard). I put all four through their paces by canning up a large quantity of turkey stock.

I pressure-canned my turkey stock (because it has bits of meat in it) in pints at 14 lbs. pressure (for my elevation) for 75 minutes in two batches. The first batch was split between the brands of disposable lids, and the second batch was split between the brands of reusable lids.

All the jars sealed. Now, lets examine the merits of each type of lid.

These are the benchmarks for quality lids and have been used by canners for generations. Made with tin-coated steel with an epoxy coating and plastisol sealant, theyre easy to find, since most stores carry them in their kitchen section. Like everything else, these lids have increased in price through the years, but not unreasonably so.

Ball/Kerr lids are famous for the satisfying pop sound as they seal, music to the ears of any canner. If correctly processed and then properly stored, the contents of jars sealed with Ball/Kerr lids are safe for years. While not officially recommended, weve eaten 10-year-old food without a problem.

Ball/Kerr lids are the standard by which all other lids are measured.

A newcomer to the scene, the request for manufacturing canning lids came to Superb Industries from two separate (and desperate) retailers during the 2020 lid shortage.

During the product development phase, Superb Industries examined common problems canners face, such as when the lid distorts and doesnt seal properly (known as buckling). After much research and testing, they sent prototype lids to over 400 home canners across the country for feedback. The proto-lids were tested on more than 18,000 jars of food.

The result is lids with a thicker sealant to accommodate discrepancies in jar rims (some jar rims are wider, some are thinner, some are more rounded, etc.). This trademarked BluSeal is thicker and softer than the sealant found on Ball/Kerr lids. They also trademarked the PopLok sound the lids make when they seal.

When I first received these lids, the two immediate things I noticed were that theyre thicker than Ball/Kerr lids and the sealant (as the name implies) is a bright blue.

I tested Superb lids several times in both a water-bath (for applesauce) and a pressure canner (for turkey stock and green beans). In all instances, theyve lived up to their name.

The first time I pulled jars with Superb lids out of a water bath, I was mildly distressed to see the lids had not yet sealed. I put the jars on a towel and waited. And waited. And waited. Then THUNK. One after the other, they all popped and sealed. Interestingly, the pop was bass in tone, not treble a much deeper sound than a standard Ball/Kerr lid. (My husband joked, They have manly pops, not girly pops.) I suspect the short delay in sealing was due to the thicker nature of the lids. A similar delay with similar results happened from Superb lids coming out of the pressure canner.

I came away incredibly enthusiastic about Superb lids and can recommend them without hesitation. They are comparable in price to Ball/Kerr lids (in some instances cheaper, except shipping must be factored in) and are, in my opinion, superior in quality.

Modern reusable lids are a two-part deal: a food-grade plastic lid and a food-grade nitrile rubber gasket. The lids can be used indefinitely; the gaskets are said to last between 12 and 15 years before they should be replaced.

Tattlers are the original reusable lids. Their genesis came in 1976 when the sudden popularity of canning with the back-to-the-land hippies resulted in a severe lid shortage across the country. The Tattler Company responded to this crisis by developing a fully reusable lid, but the product didnt catch on. The company was resurrected in 2010 and, with the advantage of internet marketing, exploded across the canning worldwith good reason. Tattler lids live up to their expectations. I first tried Tattlers in 2010 and was so impressed I ordered a lifetime supply.

These are similar to Tattlers since the son of the original Tattler creator started the company. The son had a different vision for marketing the lids, so started his own business in 2019. Theyre of similar quality and price as Tattlers and have an excellent reputation.

Reusable lids (either Tattler or Harvest Guard) have a higher learning curve. The lidsand especially the gasketsneed to be scalded before use (boil water, turn the heat off, drop the lids/gaskets into the hot water, and leave them in the hot water until theyre ready to put on the jars). After canning, the jars should be removed from the canner, allowed to rest for five minutes, the rings tightened, and then left alone for about 12 to 18 hours to fully cool. The rings should not be removed during this cooling period. Only after the rings are removed from the fully cooled jars can the canner confirm the jars have sealed. Ive had a higher failure rate with reusable lids than with disposable lids; often, at least one jar per batch fails to seal. This failure rate, however, doesnt hinder my enthusiasm for the lids for reasons Ill explain in a moment.

Disturbingly, for some canners, both Tattler and Harvest Guard lids dont ping or pop when they seal. They cant; theyre made of rigid plastic, not metal. This incorrectly leads some canners to believe the sealed food isnt safe. However, Ive had excellent success with both Tattlers and Harvest Guards as long as the directions for use are followed exactly. Reusable lids have a higher up-front cost but will last for many years. For people who are frequent canners, this is an enormous advantage.

So, why do I retain my enthusiasm for them if reusable lids are trickier to use, more expensive up front, and have a higher failure rate? Its very simple: I never have to buy canning lids again. Im a heavy canner and routinely put-up hundreds of jars of food each season. For that reason, having enough lids is an enormous concern. With my supply of reusable lids, I never have to worry about shortages again. As someone who prefers canning to all other food preservation methods, I cant even begin to express the sense of security having a lifetime supply of canning lids provides. The occasional failure to seal is a small price to pay for this peace of mind.

Out of the four kinds of lids mentioned in this article, what are my recommendations?

If youre an inexperienced canner just learning the particulars of food preservation, begin with disposable types. Theyre easier and more dependable. To be honest, I now prefer the Superb lids to the Ball/Kerr brand.

For more experienced canners, I cant recommend the reusable lids highly enough. Accept that they have a learning curve and set yourself to learn how they work. Then you can sit back and relish the thought that these lids will likely last a lifetime. I can unhesitatingly recommend either Tattler or Harvest Guard with equal enthusiasm.

Now that Im well-stocked in both kinds of lids, heres my canning strategy: If a product is expensive (such as meats), Ill use disposable lids to ensure all the jars seal. If a product is cheaper and more abundant (such as produce from our garden), Ill use reusable lids and accept that one or two jars may fail to seal.

Remember that all four of these brands of lids have been through years of testing, tweaking, adjusting, and improving. All four brands perform their function beautifully.

One final thought: For both novice and experienced canners, the quality of home-canned food is generally far superior to highly processed foods available in the grocery store. As we look to a future with rising food prices and shortages, canning skills will be invaluable. Having an abundant supply of jars and lids ensures youll be in a better position to keep your pantry stocked in the years ahead. Something to think about.

Patrice Lewis is a wife, mother, homesteader, homeschooler, author, blogger, columnist, and speaker. An advocate of simple living and self-sufficiency, she has practiced and written about self-reliance and preparedness for almost 30 years. Patrice is experienced in homestead animal husbandry and small-scale dairy production, food preservation and canning, country relocation, home-based businesses, homeschooling, personal money management, and food self-sufficiency. Follow her website http://www.PatriceLewis.com or blog http://www.Rural-Revolution.com.

Continued here:
Comparing Different Types of Canning Lids Mother Earth News - Mother Earth News

As of today (May 25), the General Data Protection Regulation has been in force for five years across the European Union. A period in which the data privacy law has been lightly enforced by regulators, left ad execs confused over what is and isnt permissible and overshadowed by platforms.

Theres no other way to explain why theres been so little enforcement of the law. Indeed, most (64%) of the 159 enforcement measures by late 2022 were merely reprimands, according to the Irish Council for Civil Liberties study of the European Data Protection Boards register of final decisions.

Maybe this is the nature of bureaucracy in all its glory.

When it launched in 2018 the GDPR was hailed as a privacy superhero of sorts. It set the rules for how companies handle personal data, making sure they couldnt just grab it without someones permission.

But those rules were written in a way that left a lot open to interpretation. And that shouldve been fine. Regulators said they would educate the market and only enforce where they believe the most harm was being caused. This happened, but not always in ways that have changed the ad market for the better. Efforts to educate were often reduced to guidance notes that some ad execs deemed indecipherable see the thriving cottage industry of so-called GDPR consultants as proof while enforcement has been patchy at best.

Johnny Ryan, senior fellow at the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, was more blunt with his assessment: He said the GDPR has not been enforced in any significant way. The crux of his argument can be read in a post he shared with the Economist. Other industry voices have been equally underwhelmed by the impact (or lack thereof) of the GDPR. The platforms never really changed their practices, said one agency exec speaking on the condition of anonymity.

In short, the story of the last five years is one of missed opportunities, minimal reforms and lots of privacy consultants.

That assessment, while overly simplified, is at least directionally right, and the recent record-breaking 1.2 billion fine dished out to Facebook owner Meta only augments the argument.

It was issued by Irelands Data Protection Commission earlier this week (May 26) after it concluded that the tech company had ferried troves of personal data of its users in Europe to the U.S. without sufficient safeguards in place against its misuse. The breakdown can be found here, but this is the abridged version: the fine itself doesnt really matter (Meta made a net profit of more than $23 billion last year): what does matter, however, is the requirement for Meta to stop the storage of personal data on European users in the U.S. where contraband Meta says this is about a clash of EU and U.S. law rather than data being at risk. This is basically true.

Needless to say, the implications of this ruling will take a while to shake out.

Keep in mind that Meta will probably appeal. Then theres the possibility that lawmakers in Europe and the U.S. can agree on a mechanism known as the Data Privacy Framework that will let Meta and other companies to legally transfer the data of EU individuals to the U.S. In the meantime, any company which needs to transfer personal data to the U.S. will remain utterly confused.

This is the GDPR in a nutshell: a delicate dance where every step forward feels like three steps back. The wide deviation from the anticipated outcomes for advertising starts to make more sense.

Facebook, media agencies, programmatic advertising were all meant to be among the biggest losers in the fallout, and yet they came through it relatively unscathed. Even dodgy cookie consent, which was a big bugbear of regulators in the run up to the GDPR, are in rude health. Advertisers still dont know how cookies the mechanism that houses the data they use to power programmatic advertisers are obtained. It turns out pretty sneakily on occasion.

Thats not to say, the GDPR was a walk in the park for the ad industry. The scars are there for all to see.

Remember Drawbridge, the cross-device vendor? It had to exit Europe entirely thanks to the GDPR. Verve did similar as did countless smaller ad tech vendors who didnt have the resource or knowledge to deal with the GDPR. Larger companies also struggled. Criteos stock price seemed to be in a permanent state of flux in those final few months before the regulation arrived. Oh, and dont forget Googles Doubleclick ID. The thing agencies relied on for cross-device attribution across the web got restricted due to the wide-ranging data privacy law.

Still, these flashpoints were rare and the consequences of them were limited.

The same cant be said for Transparency & Consent Framework (read those cookie notice pop-up that gets in the way of reading online articles).

This was the industrys attempt to standardize how businesses publishers and ad tech vendors predominantly, but also agencies can continue running programmatic advertising on the open exchange in a way that is compliant with GDPR. Surprisingly (or maybe unsurprisingly), it didnt.

The IAB Europe is working to fix the TCF it orchestrated with the rest of the market. However, those efforts may not be enough. Thats a matter for the EUs Court of Justice to settle.

Until then, the TCFs fate and more broadly the fate of buying ads from the open exchange, where prices are decided in real-time through an auction, hang in the balance. Cue lots of concerned ad execs the foundations of a large part of their industry could crumble.

The information-and-choice paradigm that the GDPR incarnates is undoubtedly the best way to empower users to decide which online content and services they pay for with money and which they wish to access against their willingness to receive advertising, said Townsend Feehan, CEO of IAB Europe. But having produced a global gold standard for data protection regulation, Europe needs to ensure the supervisory authorities have the knowledge and other resources to ensure the Regulation delivers all the benefits to users and to Europes digital economy that it can.

In many ways, the fracas over TCF is symptomatic of how much the ad industry, especially the buy-side, has adapted to the GDPR. Where possible those stakeholders have tried to replace or even rewrite cornerstones of how personal data is sourced, processed and stored but rarely have they tried to rewrite them entirely. Thats changing now, to be fair, but thats more due to second order effects of the GDPR than a direct causation of it.

A lot of this is because data privacy regulation is starting to become much more comprehensive and as a result its becoming customer centric, said Jon Suarez-Davis, chief commercial officer at data control business Ketch, who was leading Kelloggs digital strategy when the regulation came into effect. Pre-GDPR you had a handful of people who were stewarding billions of dollars of media and data investment at companies. Today, that aperture has widened: legal counsel, data scientists and other specialists are being brought into the fold a lot more when it comes to these discussions.

Trying to figure out what the GDPR has added up to over the last five years is really a process of addition by subtraction. The demonstration of what it hasnt achieved illuminates what it has. And what it has achieved is public awareness. Nowadays, people are a lot more aware of their personal privacy online than they were in 2018. True, they already were aware in markets like Germany, Italy and Spain, not so much in places like the U.K.

One in six people in the U.K. say they clear their internet browsing history and cookie cache daily and 18% say that they opt out of websites tracking cookies on a daily basis, per a study of 2,000 respondents by ad tech firm Nano Interactive. These arent overwhelming numbers by any means, but they do show an interest in data privacy issues,

We can complain about the level of enforcement or the fact that its [compliance] is too complicated but without the GDPR individuals would be in a far worse place than they are today, said Nigel Jones, co-founder of Privacy Compliance Hub. Were well set up for the future because of it.

What he means is what the GDPR has lacked in enforcement chops it made up for in terms of influence.

Over the last five years, it has become the base for many privacy regulations beyond the EU, from the California Consumer Privacy Act in the U.S to Brazils General Data Protection Law. Even recent calls for a federal privacy law in the U.S. can be traced back to the GDPR. And thats not even considering the broader impact it could have on cross-border data flows as the Meta fine shows.

Perhaps, this is the more enduring effect of the GDPR. It was the start of a more nuanced, focused debate over data privacy. And if nothing else, those conversations have forced ad execs to think a bit more about the provenance of the data they used, whether consent equated to compliance with the law, and confront aspects of an ad industry that are unethical at best and unlawful at worst. No, this didnt always lead to reform for the better, and yes marketers have got complacent in some regards. But no one marketer or otherwise can say they arent aware of these issues now.

Thats a good thing, said Ben Kartzman, chief operating officer at Mediaocean. Its really important that the ad industry gives people choice over how they share their data and are clear with them on what happens to it if they do. If GDPR has accomplished anything over the last five years it has heightened awareness of the importance of privacy and the need to protect that.

Read more:
Five years in, the GDPR has had a double-edged impact on the ad ... - Digiday

The third-party cookie is going away (eventually, probably), but cookieless identifiers remain somewhat half-baked. First-party data has become increasingly important, but privacy concerns and privacy regulations have also increased. Personalization is a priority for many advertisers, but it comes with added costs. Ad tech firms are becoming much more capable, but this is making the programmatic supply chain a bit more complicated.

These were among the top topics discussed by brand and agency executives during a pair of closed-door sessions at the Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit, which kicked off on May 22 in Palm Springs, California. The conversations were held under the Chatham House Rule, so Digiday could share was said while maintaining the executives anonymity. Here is a sampling of the conversations.

I need one scalable, proven method thats not Google. I need it 100% scalable, ubiquitous.

When youre working with different DSPs, can they work with this [cookieless identifer]? Theres this yes and no and then I can work with this, but I cant work with that. So youve got to find a workaround, and the workaround is this pain in the ass.

We work a lot with LiveRamp. Its a big headache in terms of standardizing how were pushing our data and getting it back. Theres always a lot of friction in terms of match rate, how many cookies were putting in and getting back.

All these different solutions and some of them could work but because theres so many competing interests right now, one or two of them could work but theyre trying to do the same thing or competing so we have to test them and they dont go anywhere.

Theyre just too new.

To use an analogy, who here has been to The Cheesecake Factory? Who here hasnt been able to decide what to order? Thats the problem.

It has to be ubiquitous. Everybody has to adopt the same thing and then everybodys testing off of this menu and you get like a little piece here and you get a little piece there. And then competing interests means that someone might try to close off. So if Im integrated with this supply, Im baked into that specific site list. It needs to be something where its very clear that the data companies and the supply side are on the same page. Its not fully scalable to the place where it can actually replace anything.

Advertisers are now really protective of their first-party data. So if theyve already chosen a place that theyre gonna house their data, theyre real picky about letting it flow somewhere else. Its difficult to find the right place. And LiveRamp has a really nice place in the industry to begin with because they were already trusted.

I think that we tend to actually want a monolithic solution and yet were terrified of a monolithic solution. And I think that that is something thats really getting in the way of it because we say, OK, well is it LiveRamp? Is it The Trade Desk? Is it UID 2.0? Is it whatever Googles trying to do with grouping people together? The problem is that we would all prefer to choose one so that we dont have interoperability issues.

Being able to take what Fortune 500s have already figured out, they all have their own platforms, theyre not waiting for a unified solution. Theyve already built it; it exists on their servers. Were hoping for a solution cuz our brands may or may not have that budget depending on who they are. So were kind of sitting in the middle like whats next?

No one can actually control [the programmatic advertising supply chain] to create this new ubiquitous experience. Its likely gonna become an intermediary that we have to work with between multiple data platforms. Itll complicate all of our work. My question would be: What clients will pay for it?

I mean theres definitely urgency [to move away from the third-party cookie]. I just think that Google is stretching it out and theres not a lot of trust that theyre actually gonna complete the migration this year.

Ive been laughing a lot. Every time we hear something its definite. And now not so much.

O.G. ad networks introduced ad exchanges to unite them all. We need an ad exchange for identity, thats a neutral third party. The problem with The Trade Desk is theyre not neutral. They represent the demand side, and who actually holds most of the first-party [data] keys? The publishers.

In [The Trade Desks] defense, they tried to stay neutral. But then other people, like Google, owns part of the supply. Whenever you try to trade value, like youre trying to make a JVP with The Trade Desk, they dont have as many tokens to trade with.

Everythings too divided again. Who has the relationships The Trade Desk has? Yahoos probably divesting their supply but also probably doing the same thing. What do you go to Magnite for? Magnite calls me and say, Were the CTV shop. But The Trade Desk has already kind of established that.

Theyre all [claiming theyre] the CTV shops.

Everythings creating more complexity as a way to get closer to supply.

How can we work with both the SSPs and DSPs to get what we want? I think part of it starts with figuring out what that want actually is.

I think everyone in this room is OK with regulation. The problem is that we dont have the right parties in the room for the regulation side.

Its almost like there just needs to be a better consortium of the conversation as to what needs to be decided what becomes regulation.

There has to be some standardization.

Theres all these breakouts within IAB to different groups, but there needs to be a newer wave that goes up to the Fed. You watch those [congressional hearings], and you see the questions theyre asking, and its like, Ah crap.

All of the conversations that were hearing, its because the consumer has lost trust. Not just in terms of where their data is going or how its being used. But its also how its being collected.

If were going to develop regulation, its tough because its coordinating the sell side, the data teams, the buy side. Its a lot of monkeys in that circus to get everybody in the same direction.

The trend were seeing is the larger brands are ready to go with personalization, as opposed to the medium and small brands that its more dragging them across the finish line.

Our CPG client is actually pushing personalization. We are going from these bigger strategic audiences to, I want to know the ones that are interested in sports, in traveling, and theyre each going to get a different ad thats more tailored to their interest. So our clients are pushing that personalization, but were also testing, Is that actually necessary? Do we really need to dig into these peoples data like that? Do we need to also pay more for it because its doubled our CPMs?

Content is personalized. Period. We just happen to be advertising. Like, people expect personalization. Theres not a publisher I know thats any decent size that doesnt personalize the shit out of your landing experience. Theres not a retailer I know that doesnt personalize the shit out of your landing experience.

I work on the upper funnel a lot, and Im like, Why are we personalizing this much?

I would argue, if you dont personalize, you could also run the risk of pushing people away.

Not to break it down to the most obvious thing, but its how much money you have to put into personalization. Is it even worth it for a campaign?

What if we consider the consumer instead of trying to solve the data needs on the backend? [What if] we basically just say, Yeah, were going to pay you for your information.

[Wheres that money coming from?]

In my mind, it would be whoever is housing the ads, so the publishers.

In order to make a reward very meaningful, it has to be a big number. But when we talk about [the prices advertisers pay per ad], its not going to be convincing enough for someone to share that data to the advertisers.

Is the new normal you go to a website and youve got to give an email address to even view the content? And its like, Oh, you didnt want to opt in to our CDP? Well, then you dont get to see anything. Is that the replacement we all have to go to and brands want to go to because theyre not willing to survive without data?

If you look at England, you basically cant see content until you opt in. So its just as bad, in my opinion. At the end of the day, users are either being forced into something. So I think theres a happier middle ground where users can control what they want to see and brands have to adapt.

Nothing is user-focused at all, actually. Like in the U.K., its like, OK, accept, and now I can read what I was going to read.

There needs to be a conversation with consumers where we dont talk down to them. Its kind of like what they did on Twitch where streamers have to choose if they wanted to have sponsored ads. Its like, if you want this content, this is how you support it. I feel like we need to educate the general public.

People have just gotten so used to getting everything for free. As a consumer, I get so angry when I really want to read this article and theres a paywall. Im totally willing, in that instance, just to get to that place of, Yes, Im going to log in, youre going to know everything about me, and then I can find that article. It is about educating people the value exchange that the internet has been free and, if something is free, then youre the product.

I got a cool paywall the other day. I was reading a local newspaper and hit the point where youve got to log in. But then it said, You can sign in or you could answer questions. It was some sort of study. Im like, Wait, thats cool. And then I got to read the article after that. So they got what they needed, and I got to read the content without having to do the login process, and it was a smooth experience.

Part of the problem with all this is that we try to sell this story of, We want you to have this experience and this value exchange, but I think to the average person while we think they dont think its bullshit sorry, they do.

I work in pharma. We want to manage frequency, the cadence of messages, the sequence. We want to make sure were not pressing too much or too hard. You dont want to remind somebody that they have cancer 17 times. However, it is important that you get in front of the person with something that can actually help them, but not to the point where its upsetting.

We have to take ourselves out of the advertising mindset for a moment and into the mindset of the person consuming the data. In a lot of the programmatic conversation, its more about appeasing the client.

See the article here:
'We need an ad exchange for identity': Overheard at the Digiday ... - Digiday

Today, The Drum kicks off our latest Deep Dive, The New Data & Privacy Playbook, where well be looking at everything from innovative cookie-less approaches to advertising to the boom of privacy regulation across the globe and the new frontier of data in the era of AI and web3.

Balancing consumer choice with the business imperative of data-driven decision-making is among the most daunting challenges facing the worlds tech leaders, regulators and, of course, advertisers.

But how did we get here? And whats the crux of the issue? Lets back up.

Since the late 20th century, information about internet users online behavior has served as fodder for brands keen on learning how to more effectively connect with and influence their target audiences. In fact, in 1993, when the open internet encompassed only around 600 websites, Webtrends launched as the first web analytics platforms, providing visitors with insights about internet users online habits.

In the decades since, user data has become the ultimate asset something like virtual gold in our digital world (well, actually, perhaps less like gold and more like a Birkin bag which its worth noting Hermes does not want digitally replicated). Consumer data is the beating heart of the digital advertising ecosystem which itself is the backbone of the open internet, funding publisher sites and ultimately ensuring that most information online remains freely accessible to everyday users.

But now, many advertisers scraping that data primarily through the use of third-party cookies, tracking pixels and other user-identifying signals such as Androids Google Advertiser ID feel like theyre holding a ticking time bomb.

And, well, they kind of are. Thats because in the era of social media, where users are bombarded with hyper-targeted ads at every turn, consumers have become more knowledgeable about how their personal information is being collected and used. Theyve realized that advertisers can often access information as personal as real-time geolocation data, sensitive demographic details and more and it has given them the heebie-jeebies. So theyve demanded greater transparency from online platforms and advertisers and called for increased control over how and when their information is used.

In response, policymakers from across the globe have slowly but steadily begun to roll out legislation that aims to limit advertisers ability to gather, store, sell and use consumer data without individual users consent. The EUs sweeping General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), adopted in 2016, was the first domino. Now, countries from Australia and Brazil to China and Saudi Arabia have passed similar comprehensive consumer privacy laws.

The US has seen a handful of GDPR-like bills sprout up on the state level, with five new laws going into effect this year. In Washington, a federal-level privacy bill with bipartisan support last year came closer than the US has ever been to passing a nationwide privacy law.

The UK, having deviated from GDPR last year, is working toward implementing new privacy legislation. The EU last year began enforcing a flurry of new regulations, including the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, which create more stringent rules for platforms, including new privacy measures.

Enforcement is ramping up, too, with European regulators doling out historic fines against Amazon, Instagram, Google and others for violating privacy regulations and the US Federal Trade Commission announcing plans to crack down on commercial surveillance and lax data security practices. Just last week, the US agency said it aims to issue a wholesale ban on Metas use of childrens data.

Under the watchful eyes of regulators, the tech titans who rule the data landscape have taken it upon themselves to roll out privacy-conscious policies and tools. Most influential is Googles decisions to eliminate third-party cookies in Chrome in 2024 (a decision thats been twice delayed).

Apple, for its part, cut off access to major streams of data that many developers and advertisers had come to rely on when it debuted its AppTrackingTransparency feature in 2021; the tool gives users the option to choose which apps can track them across other apps and areas of the web. The move essentially meant that user-level identifiers would no longer be automatically available to advertisers within Apples ecosystem.

Recognizing that the tactics theyve long depended on are being cut off one by one, advertisers are now trying to step away from the ticking time bomb.

But even if they relinquish their habits of stalking users across the internet, they cant undo history. At this point, consumer data is core to the modern advertisers business model, and theres no going back. For brands, its needed to understand audiences, deliver relevant messages that resonate with those audiences and assess the impact of these efforts. Its a key element of business success. In fact, some 34% of chief marketing officers are either extremely or moderately concerned about changes in the data privacy space negatively impacting revenue, according to exclusive research for The Drum powered by iResearch.

So a new riddle arises: how can advertisers tap into the power of consumer data while honoring consumer choice, respecting privacy and providing transparency?

Its a riddle thats demanding the attention of players across the ecosystem, but is especially pertinent in adtech, where the big tech players like Google and Apple are going head-to-head with smaller firms racing to build privacy-preserving data solutions for marketers.

Their strategies are varied: machine learning is being deployed to supercharge contextual advertising an approach that targets ads based on the content of a webpage; labs like Googles Privacy Sandbox are experimenting with data-driven approaches to targeting that anonymize users within groups; industry leaders are building more privacy-focused cookie-like ID solutions designed for operability across channels; data clean rooms, where personal identifiable information is masked, are helping marketers access consumer data in privacy-safe ways; and of course AI is increasingly coming into the mix.

As tech leaders work toward new solutions that could help marketers continue collecting and using third-party data, marketers are conscious that the clock is ticking on third-party cookies. So in the meantime, theyre increasingly focused on building up their stocks of zero- and first-party data. Theyre finding innovative ways of incentivizing consumers to share their data willingly with tactics as far-flung as QR code Super Bowl ads to promising free beer in exchange for an email address.

Beyond the privacy wars, marketers are running into other data dilemmas. A key issue: measuring campaign performance particularly outside of traditional digital channels.

In the worlds of linear and connected television, marketers are struggling to evaluate media performance across a fragmented ecosystem consisting of different device makers, streaming platforms and currencies. Players like Nielsen and NBCUniversal are pushing to develop universal solutions that can deliver precise and accurate data insights in any TV or video environment.

Out-of-home (OOH) and digital out-of-home (DOOH) media, too, have long faced issues of measurement precision, although innovations in programmatic buying are helping to remedy these problems.

And of course external factors like economic uncertainty and the boom of generative AI and decentralized web3 technologies are throwing more wrenches into the works for advertisers looking to navigate the complex world of data-driven decision-making.

Its a big, wild world out there.

Were here to help explain it, unpack its implications and empower you to make better decisions. For the next week, as part of The Drums 2023 Data and Privacy Deep Dive, well publish breaking news, features, opinion pieces, exclusive research and in-depth analysis that seek to explain the new data and privacy paradigm.

Key topics well explore include:

Ways in which AI-generated 'synthetic data' could help address some of marketers' privacy problems

How top agencies are helping their clients navigate the privacy minefield

How marketers are adapting to data localization rules like those found in Chinas privacy law

Preparing for the sunsetting of Googles Universal Analytics platform and the forthcoming rollout of Google Analytics 4

The growing issue of childrens and teens data privacy in the age of TikTok

How historically data-poor CPG brands are building up their stores of first-party data

Why some believe Apples privacy-focused brand messaging is a sham

The role of retail media networks in the privacy-centric future of advertising

The potential benefits and pitfalls of AI regulation for marketers

And much more

What are you waiting for? Dive in now.

To read more from The Drums latest Deep Dive, where well be demystifying data & privacy for marketers in 2023, head over to our special hub.

Visit link:
Data-driven marketing, disrupted: explore The Drum's Data ... - The Drum

Global digital ad spending is estimated to reach $836 billion by 2026

MIAMI (PRWEB) May 04, 2023

Global digital ad spending is estimated to reach $836 billion by 2026, as per Statista. While organizations leverage various types of media to meet their advertising needs, the Internet remains the most important medium which accounted for 62% of total media ad spend in 2022.

DesignRush, a B2B marketplace connecting businesses with agencies, announced the leading digital marketing agencies that help businesses build brand awareness and increase customer reach across various online channels.

The top digital marketing agencies in May are:

1. The Kyle David Group - kyledavidgroup.com Expertise: Social Media Management, Press Management, PPC Management and more

2. Power Marketing - power-marketing.com Expertise: Email Marketing, Social Media Marketing, Content Marketing and more

3. Social Driver - socialdriver.com Expertise: Social Media Advertising, Google Advertising, Ad Optimization & Measurement and more

4. K2 Analytics - k2analytics.com Expertise: eCommerce Marketing, SEO, Web Design and more

5. 108 Degrees - 108degrees.com Expertise: Email Marketing, Brand & Positioning Strategy, Content Strategy and more

6. Aus Asia Online - ausasiaonline.com.au Expertise: SEO, SEM, Content Marketing and more

7. Wild Idea Marketing - getwildidea.com Expertise: SEO Content Strategy & Execution, Link Building, Digital PR and more

8. Howbiz Solutions - howbiz.ca Expertise: PPC Management, SEO, Social Media Marketing and more

9. Become Digital Today - becomedigitaltoday.com Expertise: Web Design, Social Media Marketing, Lead Generation and more

10. Webzin Infotech - webzin.in Expertise: Copywriting, SEO, Social Media Management and more

11. Just Get Known - justgetknown.com Expertise: Brand Design & Strategy, Social Media Marketing, Email Marketing and more

12. Attorney Sluice - attorneysluice.com Expertise: Branding & Content Strategy, PPC Management, SEO and more

13. Create Element - createelementslo.com Expertise: Reputation Management, SEO, Web Design and more

14. 24 East Media - 24eastmedia.com Expertise: Advertising, Influencer Marketing, Branding and more

15. Good Oil Digital Marketing - goodoil.marketing Expertise: Google Business Profile Management, SEO, Email Marketing and more

16. EloQ Communications - eloqasia.com Expertise: Digital Strategy, Influencer Marketing, PR Distribution and more

17. bettr.email - bettr.email Expertise: Email Design, Email Content Development, Campaign Management and more

18. The Swell Co-Lab - theswellcolab.com Expertise: Social Media Strategy, Email Strategy, Marketing Automation and more

19. California SEO Professionals- californiaseopros.com Expertise: SEO, PPC Management, Social Media Management and more

20. Boombit - boombit.agency Expertise: Web Development, Video Production, Email Production and more

21. First Fig Marketing & Consulting - firstfigconsulting.com Expertise: Digital Marketing Consulting, Content Marketing, Social Media Marketing and more

22. Assistant Media Group - assistantmedia.com Expertise: SEO & Consulting, Media Buying & Relations, Web Design and more

23. Think Big Digital Solutions - tbdigitalsolutions.com Expertise: Content Marketing, eCommerce Marketing, Influencer Marketing and more

24. DOE Media - doe.media Expertise: Advertising, Email Marketing, Creative Services and more

25. Rosarium - rosarium.work Expertise: Media Relations & Pitching, Event Planning, Social Media Marketing and more

26. Advirtis - advirtis.com Expertise: Digital Advertising, PPC Management, SEO and more

27. XA Talent - myxatalent.com Expertise: Branding, Digital PR, Paid Media and more

28. Akseom - akseom.agency Expertise: Advertising, Email Marketing, SEO and more

29. The Social Savvy - thesocial-savvy.com Expertise: Social Media Management, Email Campaigns, Web Design and more

30. Fire For Effect Marketing - fireforeffectffe.com Expertise: Web Design & Development, SEO, PPC Management and more

Brands can explore the top digital marketing agencies by location, size, average hourly rate and portfolio on DesignRush.

About DesignRush:

DesignRush.com is a B2B marketplace connecting businesses with agencies through expert reviews and agency ranking lists, awards, knowledge resources and personalized agency recommendations for vetted projects.

More here:
The Top Digital Marketing Agencies In May, According To DesignRush - PR Web