Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

U.S. sounds caution against optimism by Iran, Russia over nuclear talks – Reuters

Dec 28 (Reuters) - The United States on Tuesday expressed caution over upbeat comments by Iran and Russia about talks in Vienna to salvage the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, saying it was still too soon to say if Tehran had returned to the negotiations with a constructive approach.

Iran and Russia both gave upbeat views on Tuesday about talks that kicked off this week to salvage Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with global powers, although Western nations have said the negotiations are going too slowly.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said a deal was possible in the near future if other parties showed "good faith" while Russian envoy Mikhail Ulyanov said a working group was making "indisputable progress" in the eighth round of talks.

Register

Speaking at a telephonic press briefing, State Department spokesperson Ned Price said there was some progress in the last round of talks but it was too soon to tell whether Tehran, in the current round, returned to the table to build on those gains.

"It's really too soon to tell whether Iran has returned with a more constructive approach to this round," Price said. "We are now assessing, in the course of these talks, whether the Iranians came back with an agenda of new issues or preliminary solutions to the ones already presented," Price said.

The original agreement lifted sanctions against Tehran in exchange for restrictions on its atomic activities but Donald Trump pulled Washington out of the deal in 2018, a year after he became U.S president. Iran later breached many of the deal's nuclear restrictions and kept pushing well beyond them.

The latest round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States resumed on Monday in Vienna, with Tehran focused on getting U.S. sanctions lifted again, as they were under the original bargain, despite scant progress on reining in its atomic activities. read more

Iran refuses to meet U.S. officials directly, meaning other parties to the deal besides the United States and Iran --- Russia, China, France, Britain, Germany and the European Union -- must shuttle between the two sides.

The seventh round of talks, the first under Iran's new hardline President Ebrahim Raisi, ended 11 days ago after some new Iranian demands were added to a working text.

"The Vienna talks are headed in a good direction," Iranian Minister Amirabdollahian said in comments to reporters broadcast by state media. "We believe that if other parties continue the round of talks which just started with good faith, reaching a good agreement for all parties is possible."

The U.S. delegation, led by Special Envoy Rob Malley, will be in a better position in the coming days to determine whether Iran has to come to the latest round of talks with a 'fundamentally different position," Price said.

Iran insists all U.S. sanctions must be lifted before steps are taken on the nuclear side, while Western negotiators say nuclear and sanctions steps must be balanced in the agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA).

URGENT NEGOTIATIONS

European negotiators also said some technical progress had been made in the last round of talks to accommodate Iranian requests, but warned that the parties only had weeks, not months, to salvage the deal.

France, Germany and the United Kingdom said in a statement on Tuesday that technical progress had been made in the last round and the parties now needed to fully focus on the key outstanding issues, particularly nuclear and sanctions.

They said while they were not setting an artificial deadline, there were weeks not months left to strike a deal.

"The negotiation is urgent - and our teams are here to work swiftly and in good faith towards getting a deal."

Ulyanov, the Russian envoy, said on Tuesday that a working group was making progress. "Sanctions lifting is being actively discussed in informal settings," he wrote on Twitter.

The 2015 deal extended the time Iran would need to obtain enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb - if it chose to - to at least a year from about two to three months. Most experts say that time is now less than before the deal, although Iran says it only wants to master nuclear technology for civil uses.

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said Israel would not automatically oppose a nuclear deal but world powers must take a firmer position.

Israel says it will never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons and that all options are on the table. Israeli leaders have said that a nuclear Iran would pose an existential threat to Israel.

(This story refiles to fix spelling of word 'too' in first paragraph)

Register

Reporting by Humeyra Pamuk and Daphne Psaledakis in Washington, Miranda Murray in Berlin, Jeffrey Heller, Dan Williams and Ari Rabinovitch in Jerusalem, and Dubai newsroom; Writing by Tom Perry; Editing by David Clarke and Alistair Bell

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Original post:
U.S. sounds caution against optimism by Iran, Russia over nuclear talks - Reuters

The Looming Threat of a Nuclear Crisis with Iran – The New Yorker

The first six rounds of diplomacy this spring, Malley told me, made real progress. In June, he presented a nuclear package that included ending most of Trumps sanctions. The collective sense of everybodyobviously the Europeans, the Russians and Chinese, but also the Iranian delegation at the timewas that we could see the outlines of a deal, he said. If each side was prepared to make the necessary compromises, we could get there.

The talks paused that month, after Irans Presidential election. Hassan Rouhani, the previous President and a reformist, had won in 2013 and 2017 on a platform of engaging with the United States. But Trumps sanctions sabotaged the economic benefits promised by the nuclear accord, so in 2021 a majority of Iranians didnt bother to vote. Ebrahim Raisi, a rigid ideologue and the head of the judiciary, was elected. The U.S. had already sanctioned Raisi, noting his role on a death commission that ordered the execution, in 1988, of some five thousand dissidents. At his Inauguration, in August, Raisi pledged, All the parameters of national power will be strengthened.

Malley had left his suits at the hotel in Vienna, expecting talks to resume before long. But five months passed, and Irans nuclear program advanced further. Malley eventually had his suits shipped home. By the time diplomacy resumed, in late November, Malley told me, Irans program had blown through the limits imposed by the J.C.P.O.A. As theyre making these advances, they are gradually emptying the deal of the nonproliferation benefits for which we bargained, he said. The Biden Administration has pushed back. Were not going to agree to a worse deal because Iran has built up its nuclear program, Malley added. At some point soon, trying to revive the deal would be tantamount to trying to revive a dead corpse. The U.S. and its allies might then have to address a runaway Iranian nuclear program. Without a return to the deal, a senior State Department official said, it is more than plausible, possible, and maybe even probable that Iran will try to become a threshold nuclear state.

The wild card is Israel. In September, at the U.N. General Assembly, the new Israeli Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, charged that Irans nuclear program had hit a watershed moment, and so has our tolerance. Words do not stop centrifuges from spinning. Israel is due to soon begin training for possible military strikes on Iran. During a visit to Washington in December, Defense Minister Benny Gantz urged the Biden Administration to hold joint military exercises with Israel. The problem with Irans nuclear program is that, for the time being, there is no diplomatic mechanism to make them stop, Palti told me. There is no deterrent. Iran is no longer afraid. We need to give them the stop sign. U.S. officials counter that Israeli operations have often provoked Tehran and set back diplomacy.

Iran can still reverse technological advances if a deal is reached. Its knowledge, however, is irreversible. Irans nuclear program hit new milestones over the past year, Kelsey Davenport said. As it masters these new capabilities, it will change our understanding about how the country may pursue nuclear weapons down the road. Even if the Biden Administration does broker a return to the accord, Republicans have vowed to scuttle it. In October, Senator Ted Cruz, of Texas, tweeted, Unless any deal w/ Iran is ratified by the Senate as a treatywhich Biden knows will NOT happenit is a 100% certainty that any future Republican president will tear it up. Again.

As the nuclear talks foundered earlier this year, I flew to the Al Asad Airbase, in Iraqs remote western desert, with Kenneth (Frank) McKenzie,Jr., a Marine general from Alabama, who heads U.S. military operations across the Middle East and South Asia. It was part of an extended tour of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Qatar, and Lebanon. In the cavernous cabin of a C-17, he sat alone in a room-size container draped with an American flag. McKenzies military experience with Iran has been perilous and bloody. When he was a young officer, two hundred and forty-one marines were killed in the 1983 suicide bombing of U.S. peacekeepers in Beirut. It was the largest loss of marine lives in a single day since the battle of Iwo Jima, in the Second World War. The Reagan Administration blamed Iran and its then nascent proxies in Hezbollah. Almost four decades later, McKenzie told me that Tehrans nuclear capabilities were far from the only danger it now poses.

Under Trump, hostilities between the United States and Iran escalated. They peaked in 2020, when Trump ordered the assassination of General Qassem Suleimani, the revered head of Irans Quds Force, the lite wing of the Revolutionary Guard. As Suleimani arrived in Baghdad to meet local allies, McKenzie called in an M-9 Reaper drone to fire four Hellfire missiles at the Generals convoy. Suleimani and nine others were shredded. His severed hand was identified by the large red-stone ring often photographed on his wedding finger.

Five days later, Iran fired eleven ballistic missileseach carrying at least a thousand-pound warheadat Al Asad Airbase. U.S. intelligence had tracked Irans deployment of the missiles, giving the Americans a few hours to evacuate their warplanes and half of their personnel. Lieutenant Colonel Staci Coleman, the commander of an air expeditionary squad, had to decide which of her crew of a hundred and sixty should leave and who was emotionally equipped to stay. I was deciding who would live and who would die, she later told military investigators. I honestly thought anyone remaining behind would perish. Many of the service members leaving Al Asad anxiously hugged the ones staying. No American military personnel had been killed by an enemy air strike since 1953, during the Korean War.

The first salvo struck around 1A.M. Master Sergeant Janet Liliu recounted to investigators, What happened in the bunkers, well, no words can describe the atmosphere. I wasnt ready to die, but I tried to prepare myself with every announcement of an incoming missile. The bombardment dragged on for hours; it was the largest ballistic-missile attack ever by any nation on American troops. No Americans died, but a hundred and ten suffered traumatic brain injuries. Trump dismissed the suffering at Al Asad. I heard they had headaches, he told reporters. Two years later, many of those at Al Asad are still experiencing profound memory, vision, and hearing losses. One died by suicide in October. Eighty have been awarded Purple Hearts.

The lesson of Al Asad, McKenzie told me, is that Irans missiles have become a more immediate threat than its nuclear program. For decades, Irans rockets and missiles were wildly inaccurate. At Al Asad, they hit pretty much where they wanted to hit, McKenzie said. Now they can strike effectively across the breadth and depth of the Middle East. They could strike with accuracy, and they could strike with volume.

Irans advances have impressed both allies and enemies. After the 1979 revolution, the young theocracy purged the Shahs military and rebuilt it almost from scratch, despite waves of economic sanctions. Iran fought a ruinous eight-year war with Iraq in the nineteen-eighties that further depleted its armory. Its Air Force is still weak, its ships and tanks are mediocre, and its military is not capable of invading another country and holding territory.

Instead, the regime has concentrated on developing missiles with longer reach, precision accuracy, and greater destructive power. Iran is now one of the worlds top missile producers. Its arsenal is the largest and most diverse in the Middle East, the Defense Intelligence Agency reported. Iran has proven that it is using its ballistic-missile program as a means to coerce or intimidate its neighbors, Malley told me. Iran can fire more missiles than its adversariesincluding the United States and Israelcan shoot down or destroy. Tehran has achieved what McKenzie calls overmatcha level of capability in which a country has weaponry that makes it extremely difficult to check or defeat. Irans strategic capacity is now enormous, McKenzie said. Theyve got overmatch in the theatrethe ability to overwhelm.

Amir Ali Hajizadeh, a brigadier general and a former sniper who heads Irans Aerospace Force, is known for incendiary bravado. In 2019, he boasted, Everybody should know that all American bases and their vessels in a distance of up to two thousand kilometres are within the range of our missiles. We have constantly prepared ourselves for a full-fledged war. Hajizadeh succeeded General Hassan Moghaddam, who founded Irans missile and drone programs, and who died in 2011, with sixteen others, in a mysterious explosion. They had been working on a missile capable of hitting Israel.

Israelis call Hajizadeh the new Suleimani. McKenzie called him reckless. In 2019, Hajizadehs forces downed a U.S. reconnaissance drone over the Persian Gulf. He also orchestrated the missile strikes on Al Asad. Hours after that attack, his forces shot down a Ukrainian Boeing 737 passenger plane, with a hundred and seventy-six people on board, as it took off from Tehrans international airport. Everyone perished. For three days, Iran refused to accept blame until, under pressure, Hajizadeh went on television to admit it.

Iran now has the largest known underground complexes in the Middle East housing nuclear and missile programs. Most of the tunnels are in the west, facing Israel, or on the southern coast, across from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf sheikhdoms. This fall, satellite imagery tracked new underground construction near Bakhtaran, the most extensive complex. The tunnels, carved out of rock, descend more than sixteen hundred feet underground. Some complexes reportedly stretch for miles. Iran calls them missile cities.

In 2020, the Revolutionary Guard marked the anniversary of the U.S. Embassy takeover by releasing a video of Hajizadeh inspecting a subterranean missile arsenal. As suspenseful music plays in the background, he and two other Revolutionary Guard commanders march through a tunnel lined with rows of missiles stacked on top of one another. A recording of General Suleimani echoes in the background: You start this war, but we create the end ofit. An underground railroad ferries Emad missiles for rapid successive launches. Emads have a range of a thousand miles and can carry a conventional or a nuclear warhead.

Read more from the original source:
The Looming Threat of a Nuclear Crisis with Iran - The New Yorker

Iran bars travellers from parts of Western Europe over Omicron fears – Reuters

DUBAI, Dec 26 (Reuters) - Iran has banned the entry of travellers from Britain, France, Denmark and Norway for 15 days as part of curbs following the discovery of the highly transmissible Omicron variant of COVID-19 in the Middle East's worst-hit country.

State television said on Sunday a similar ban imposed in late November on travellers from South Africa and seven neighbouring countries was also extended for 15 days.

Health authorities also indefinitely halted land travel to neighbouring Turkey, a popular tourist destination, the broadcaster said.

Register

Iran, the pandemic's epicentre in the Middle East, has reported just 14 confirmed Omicron cases so far but media reports said detection kits were not widely available and officials have warned of a possible rapid spread within weeks.

The country has suffered 131,400 deaths in five waves of COVID-19 infections since February 2020.

Nearly 51.3 million of Iran's population of about 85 million have received two doses of coronavirus vaccine.

Register

Reporting by Dubai newsroom; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read the original:
Iran bars travellers from parts of Western Europe over Omicron fears - Reuters

Failure in the Iran nuclear talks – Washington Times

OPINION:

Operating on the nonsensical policy that anything former President Donald Trump did should be reversed, the Biden administration reengaged in indirect talks with Iran to return to the disastrous 2015 nuclear deal framework.

Sending the worst possible negotiator, Bob Malley, to Vienna, President Biden promised the American people the U.S. would return to the original agreement and get Iran to halt its ballistic missile program and end its support to terrorist operations in the Middle East. This effort has apparently failed, even as the U.S. was willing to concede to almost all of Irans demands.

Here, Iran has engaged in an extortion effort as a price for entering new talks, demanding the U.S. release of $10 billion of frozen Iranian funds to prove the seriousness of its intentions. In addition to $3.5 billion already released as a gesture of goodwill, Mr. Biden had already extended the waiver on sanctions on Iranian oil.

Iran has also demanded a guarantee the U.S. would not withdraw from any future agreement, which is absurd. Even Iran understands Mr. Biden cant commit to such a demand as a new nuclear deal is a political understanding and not a legally binding treaty approved by the Senate. Nobody from either party believes such an agreement could ever gain Senate approval. If another Republican takes office after Mr. Biden, Iran knows that the U.S. would likely withdraw again.

The new ultra-conservative Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi has taken a hard line in the negotiations and has been unwilling to compromise on anything. If Mr. Raisi obtains anything less than his maximum demands, it will appear as capitulation, not compromise, and hurt his chance of becoming supreme leader, his highest priority.

Iran recognizes Mr. Biden is desperate for an agreement at almost any cost, which he can portray as a win. Fortunately, Mr. Bidens critics and even some mainstream media see this as well and arent willing to let him cave in on every issue entirely. Reflecting this reality, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan was ominous when speaking about the negotiations saying, Its not going well and that, We do not yet have a pathway back into the JCPOA.

Some Democrats have recognized diplomacy was moving backward, as Irans representatives in Vienna made new demands while retracting previous concessions. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has even noted that the U.S. would not accept an approach where Iran stalls in the talks and advances its nuclear program. The Vienna negotiations just became a cover for Iranian progress toward a threshold nuclear weapons capability.

Unfortunately, the solution suggested by these Democrats is a fanciful delusion. They believe a diplomatic effort to resolve this crisis can be achieved by restoring Irans fear that its current nuclear path will trigger the use of force by the U.S.

Their recommendation that the U.S. military engages in exercises that instill fear into the Iranian leadership is not realistic. The Iranians and few in the U.S. believe Mr. Biden will ever use force against Iran or anyplace else. Here too, Mr. Bidens rhetoric that all options are on the table only rings hollow.

Saber rattling has not been limited to the U.S. Israel has been very public about reviving its planning efforts for war with Iran and potential airstrikes against the Iranian nuclear facilities. There is no realistic scenario for Israel undertaking such a strike or that it could be successful.

Israeli Chief of General Staff Aviv Kochavi sees the military option against Iran as an impractical scenario. Previously, the Israelis believed that the U.S. under Mr. Trump would do the work for them with pressure and crippling sanctions that would cause the regimes collapse. Clearly, this did not happen.

Israel has been focused on developing defensive plans for warning, detecting and intercepting Iranian drones. It could become a key player and asset for regional states under threat of these drones. In the future, these means of detection could also be deployed in the Gulf states, providing early warning of drone attacks a possible solution against the long-term threat of Iranian ballistic missiles.

Currently, Israel continues to engage in covert operations within Iran, targeting nuclear scientists and facilities with limited success in delaying the program. Recent cyberattacks on Iranian gas stations were less successful. Some have suggested that such covert operations be increased but fail to understand that such activities do not scale. The resources and personnel needed to greatly expand them dont exist and wont stop the Iranian program.

Iran uses its operatives and proxies to attack the U.S. and its allies, largely in Syria and Iraq. Most recently, two attacks were attributed to Iran and its Shiite militias the drone attack against the U.S. base in al-Tanf in eastern Syria and on the home of Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi. The U.S. has responded by striking Iranian weapons depots in Syria and Iranian drones but has not engaged Iranian forces directly.

For now, there is a tacit acceptance that there will be no new nuclear agreement. Iran may approach or cross the threshold in becoming a nuclear power, and that Plan B may well consist of effective defensive technologies. Added to this will need new and realistic thinking about how deterrence can be applied to this critical scenario. Without some realistic thinking, the Middle East may face a prospect nobody wants.

Abraham Wagner has served in several national security positions, including the NSC Staff under Presidents Nixon and Ford. He is the author of the recent book Henry Kissinger: Pragmatic Statesman in Hostile Times.

Read more:
Failure in the Iran nuclear talks - Washington Times

Iran Adding New Anti-Missile System to its T-72M Tanks – The National Interest

The Iranian military doesnthave the most modern equipment, but the Islamic Republic hasmade dowith its aging arsenal. It haseven beenable to produce some equipment domestically. This month, those efforts included the mounting of a new anti-missile system on the turrets of its Soviet-designed T-72M tanks to protect them from attack, the Fars news agency reported on Wednesday.

The system has been tested and will be installed on the tank turrets. It will be able to deflect all types of missiles by jamming their systems,Fars reported during thethird day of Great Prophet 17(Payambar-e Azam 17) land and sea military maneuvers that were taking place in three of the republic's southern provinces. The drills were reportedly taking place in three Gulf coastal provinces, including in Bushehr, not far from the country's only nuclear power plant.

Improved Karrar Tank

The news agency also cited Iran's Revolutionary Guards land forces chief, Gen.MohammadPakpourclaims that themain gunon the tankshas a 3-kilometer (1.9-mile) range and precision night-time capabilities.

Production of the T-72 main battle tank (MBT) began in 1969, and it first entered service with the Soviet Unionfiftyyears ago. It was the most common tank employed by the Warsaw Pact from the 1970s to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. It was also exported to other countries, including Finland, India, Iraq, Syria and Yugoslavia. It was employed by the Iraqi military in the Iran-IraqWar andwas considered the feared tank of that conflict.

The Islamic Republic also importednumerousT-72S, the export variant of the T-72M, while it captured aboutone hundredIraqi tanks during the war. Licensed production of the locally made version,the Karrar, is still underway at some Iranian factories and the Islamic Republic has sought to modernize itsindigenously-builttanks as effectively as possible.

In 2020, Iran unveiled a heavily upgraded and modified version of the tank, the T-72M1, whichfeatured a modified turretwith flat armor on its side and a simplified forward-opening hatch. Thecommander's cupolaand machine gun were removed, whichgiveit the appearance of a more modern T-90. However,Iran has rejected that there has been any alleged collaboration in the project.

The modified T-72 Karrar tanks are reported tobe in servicewith the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) andare equipped with a camouflage system that provides concealment against thermal infrared radar detection, while it is also believed to be furnished with an electro-optical fire control system, laser rangefinders, and a ballistic computer.

In addition to seeming to have elements of the T-90, the Karrar has been noted to have features borrowed from the American M1 Abrams and even the British Chieftain tanks. In developing an indigenous MBT, Tehran seemed to have taken elementsfrom other noted tanks. Its main armament is a 125-millimeter2A45M/M-2/M-5 smoothbore gun with a stabilizer.Itappears as thoughit could be equipped with a new anti-missile system. How effective the tankis remainsunknown, but it could far more capable than some of the antiquated hardware the Islamic Republic has had to rely on.

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He regularly writes about military small armsand is the author of several books on military headgear includingA Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com.

Image: Reuters

See the original post:
Iran Adding New Anti-Missile System to its T-72M Tanks - The National Interest