Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

Iran Sentences 21-Year-Old to Death for ‘Insulting the Prophet’ Online – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

More specifically, the trio was charged with insulting the Prophet and insulting the Supreme Leader of Iran with text messages, per the UKDaily Mail.Evidently, insulting the Supreme Leader only gets you 16 months in jail but insulting Mohammed is a capital offense. The Center for Human Rights in Iran notes that if a person accused of insulting Mohammed claims his words were due to anger or a mistake, the court can reduce the sentence to 74 lashes instead of death.

Dehghan was sentenced to death, even though the CHRI says he was told he would receive a pardon if he confessed to his crimes and repented of his actions. The Center notes he only had four days remaining in his military service at the time of his arrest.

Asource told the CHRI:

Security and judicial authorities promised Sinas family that if they didnt make any noise about his case, he would have a better chance of being freed, and that talking about it to the media would work against him. Unfortunately, the family believed those words and stopped sharing information about his case and discouraged others from sharing it as well.

One of his co-defendants was given a seven-year prison sentence reduced to three years on appeal, while the other, Mohammad Nouri, has also been sentenced to death.

According to the UKIndependent,the exact content of the messages sent by the three defendants on the Line messaging application has not been made public.

Dehghan has been held in the notorious Arak prison where a source told the CHRI he is suffering from depression and often cries. The source also said Dehghan is held in a ward with drug convicts and murderers who broke his jaw a while ago.

He is running out of options to escape the death sentence, which was upheld by the Iranian Supreme Court in January. In an interview on March 28th, Dehghans lawyer said a request for judicial review of his sentence has been filed.

AccordingtoSinaslawyer, steps have been taken for a judicial review, and with the good news were hearing from him, God willing this case will come to end positively as soon as possible, said Dehghans mother.

However, another human-rights organization called Article 19 has complained Dehghans court-appointed lawyer failed to adequately defend him at trial.

Article 19 said the case demonstrates how Iranians are at the mercy of a system where forced confessions, false promises, and threats to family members undermine not only national judicial processes but the international standards Iran has signed up to.

View original post here:
Iran Sentences 21-Year-Old to Death for 'Insulting the Prophet' Online - Breitbart News

Haley: Assad a ‘war criminal’ protected by Russia, Iran – Fox News

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley has branded Syrian president Bashar al-Assad as "a war criminal,' who has been protected by Russia and Iran in the Security Council for far too long.

She told Fox News the Trump administration hopes Assad will be brought to justice for the overwhelming humanitarian crisis and continued carnage that has torn his nation apart.

She also blamed the Obama administration for not acting sooner to try and prevent the war.

"The previous administration needs to take responsibility for that, as well," she said. "First of all, Assadhe's a war criminal. He's used chemical weapons on his own people. He's not allowing aid to come in. He is very much a deterrence to peace. But then you look at the fact that the Security Council has to acknowledge when the chemical weapons -- we had proof that he used it three times on his own people. Why aren't we dealing with that?

"Then, you know, you have to look at the Iranian influence and the fact that we've got to get that out. Syria is in such sad shape, but it doesn't have to be that way. If you look back, so many things could have been done to prevent where we are today. And that's what we need to focus on now."

Haley, who resigned as governor of South Carolina when the Senate approved her nomination in January, has been a quick learner in her new arena, observers say, who has brought a blunt message from the Trump administration to the international diplomats at the world body on several issues.

She calls North Korea, "a threat to the world," and demands that Beijing impose sanctions on Kim Jong-un's regime for its continued nuclear and ballistic missile tests.

"It all comes down to China," Haley says. "They could put enough pressure on North Korea to get them to step back. Now it's time for them to prove it."

She is clear about her role at the U.N.

"I think that the United States has always been the moral compass of the world. And I think we are generous by nature. And we want to see people safe. We don't want to see people starve. We don't want to see people treated -- mistreated by their governments," she said, noting that her first goal is to bring American values...and the nation's voice...back to the organization that she says has gotten "stale."

Haley intends to focus on human rights, the U.N. budget, peacekeeping reform, and addressing the wrongs that have plagued the world body.

"Leadership is just letting them know what we're for, what we're against, have the backs of our allies and make sure they keep the backs of us, and then anyone that challenges us, call them out. Let them know what we think is wrong. That's all this is just making sure we're changing the culture to showing strength from the United States again, action and making sure that we show value in the United Nations. I think it's important for the American people."

The Trump administration has proposed deep cuts in the U.S. contribution to the U.N.'s budget. American taxpayers currently pay upwards of $2.8 billion to fund the world body's regular and peacekeeping operations. The White House has proposed slicing the U.S. contribution by almost half, $1 billion.

According to the U.N.'s own figures, the U.S. is responsible for just over 28 percent of the peacekeeping budget, which the Trump administration has sought to cut by 3 percent, for a total contribution of 25 percent. That amount, however, would still be more than double the next largest contributors, China and Japan...about four times more than Germany, France and Great Britain...and six times more than Russia.

Haley insisted any reductions will not harm the peacekeeping and humanitarian efforts, denying the fears expressed by some that refugees could starve, children will not get UNICEF innoculations, and peacekeeping deployments would be crippled.

"What we want is for people to be safe. We want the aid to get in," she sayid, noting that her fellow diplomats share the same goals.

"All of the other countries are saying, 'yes we think that too.' They want to see peacekeeping reform. They want to see management reform. They want to see the U.N. become more active and go back to the mission."

On Friday, the Security Council unanimously voted to slightly reduce the troop level of the peacekeeping forces in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Haley told Fox News that the biggest surprise since her arrival two months ago, is what she called the U.N.'s "anti-Israeli bias," citing meetings on the Middle East that focus only on the Jewish State.

"They're not talking about we would care about. They're not talking about Syria. They're not talking about Iran. They're not talking about North Korea. What they are talking about is Israel. Every single month, for 10 years, they've been Israel bashing. And that was something that I just couldn't believe they put the time and energy into doing that, when we have so many threats around the world."

"I think she's great," Haleys Israeli counterpart, Israel's United Nations Ambassador Danny Danon, told Fox News when asked how he thinks she is doing.

"She comes with her values, her tools, and that's what we need at the U.N., to bring the U.N. back to its core values. The U.N. is a good institution, but it was kidnapped by evil forces and I believe with Ambassador Haley, and my team, we can work together, and maybe, maybe change the U.N. and bring it back to what it should be."

Haley points to several changes that have occurred under her watch, from preventing the appointment of a former prime minister of the Palestinian Authority until the P.A. engages in peace talks, to the resignation of a U.N. official who released a report branding Israel as an "apartheid state."

"Its changing, and the tone is getting better," she notes.

"And not only that, I think they're tired of me yelling at them about Israel bashing."

Ben Evansky contributed to this report.

Follow Eric Shawn on Twitter: @EricShawnTV

More here:
Haley: Assad a 'war criminal' protected by Russia, Iran - Fox News

Iran upset with Pakistan’s Raheel Sharif heading Islamic Military Alliance – Hindustan Times

Iran has expressed reservations about the appointment of former Pakistan Army chief Gen Raheel Sharif as head of the Islamic Military Alliance created by Saudi Arabia, prompting Islamabad to step up efforts to assuage Tehran.

We are concerned about this issue...that it may impact the unity of Islamic countries, Mehdi Honardoost, Irans envoy to Pakistan, told the media. This was the first time Iran publicly expressed its displeasure on the issue.

Pakistan contacted Iranian officials before issuing a no-objection certificate to Sharif to take up the position of head of the 39-nation military alliance, but this did not indicate that Iran was satisfied with this decision or it had accepted the same, Honardoost was quoted as saying by state-run IRNA news agency.

Defence minister Khawaja Asif said earlier this month the Pakistan government had cleared Sharif to take up the job following a formal request from Saudi Arabia.

Islamabads decision is set to further complicate fraught Pakistan-Iran relations, especially at a time when Saudi Arabia and Iran are jockeying for influence in hot spots across the Middle East.

Read more

Foreign secretary Tehmina Janjua said on Tuesday that the Islamic Military Alliance wasnt against any country and that Sharif will not act against Iran. She told a parliamentary committee on foreign affairs: The Islamic alliance is against terrorism, not any country.

She added Pakistan is making efforts to reduce tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran. It is difficult for Pakistan to maintain equal relations with both countries but Pakistan will not go against Irans interests, she said.

Pakistani officials confirmed they intend to reach out to the Iranian government to address Tehrans concerns. Officials told the media that Pakistan has clearly informed Saudi Arabia that it would not become part of any campaign against any country, including Iran.

Gen Qamar Bajwa, the current Pakistan Army chief, took the Iranian leadership into confidence and Sartaj Aziz, adviser to the prime minister on foreign affairs, travelled to Tehran in late February to address Irans concerns. Bajwa might also visit Iran to assuage the fears of the Iranian leadership over the controversial alliance.

Raheel Sharif reportedly accepted the offer to head the alliance on the condition that countries such as Iran would be invited to join it in order to make it a broad-based initiative and dispel impressions about its sectarian outlook.

But Iranian envoy Honardoost said Tehran had informed Islamabad that Iran would not become part of such a military alliance. Iran had not been extended an offer to join a coalition of this sort, he added.

He proposed that all important Islamic countries come together to form a coalition of peace to resolve issues rather (than) forming a controversial military alliance.

Read more

Iran is known to have opposed the Saudi initiative because of its serious differences over the current unrest in the Middle East, particularly in Syria and Yemen.

Just days before Pakistan issued the no-objection certificate to Raheel Sharif, the Iranian envoy visited the General Headquarters, where Gen Qamar Bajwa gave him a categorical assurance that Islamabads decision would not hurt Tehrans interests.

Bajwa also informed Honardoost that Pakistan values its bilateral ties with Iran, The Express Tribune reported. Bajwa also said Pakistan had never objected to Irans close ties with India and, therefore, Islamabad expected Tehran to respect the decision over the Saudi alliance.

Pakistan has found itself in the crosshairs of Middle Eastern politics as Saudi Arabia named it part of the military alliance without first getting Islamabads consent. After initial ambiguity, Islamabad confirmed its participation in the alliance.

Sharifs appointment had been criticised by some politicians, retired army officers and intellectuals, who questioned the former army chiefs decision. Opposition parties, including the Pakistan Peoples Party and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, too are skeptical of Sharifs role in the alliance.

Both parties consider the decision a violation of a parliamentary resolution passed in April 2015 that called for Pakistan to maintain a policy of neutrality, particularly in the conflict in Yemen.

Link:
Iran upset with Pakistan's Raheel Sharif heading Islamic Military Alliance - Hindustan Times

Iran’s agitation in the Gulf hides defeat at home – The National

Tensions in the Gulf are increasing. In the past two months alone, several incidents have been reported of Iran "harassing" foreign navy ships.

On March 25, United States Navy commanders accused Iran of harassing warships going through the Strait of Hormuz. Two weeks earlier, several Iranian assault craft came dangerously close to both a US and a British navy ship. A similar incident occurred earlier that same month.

Commanders of Irans armed forces have had mixed reactions. They have variously rejected some accusations, thrown the blame on to the other side or issued warnings. In the latest statements, Brig Gen Masoud Jazayeri, deputy chief of staff of Irans armed forces, said: "We emphasise that the Americans would be responsible for any unrest in the Gulf and again warn that the US military must change its behaviour."

All this may lead to the belief that there is going to be a direct armed confrontation between Iran and the US in the Gulf. However, it is extremely unlikely that these minor clashes and rhetoric would lead to what would be a grave military miscalculation that would turn Gulf tensions into a regional conflagration.

The major reasons for my argument are anchored in the history of Iran-US relations in the Gulf, as well as the fact that it is not in the political interests of Irans ruling clerics to engage in a war with the US, despite the rhetoric.

First, Americas military capabilities are much superior to those of Iran. The US military could single-handedly destroy, or significantly damage, Iran's conventional armed forces and military infrastructure in a matter of weeks. In any hypothetical war other global and regional powers are more likely to ally with the US because Tehran has repeatedly threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz, which is vital to the oil trade, and inflict damage on other Gulf states. Such a war would significantly damage Irans economy because nearly 70 per cent of its revenues originate from oil exports passing through the strait. Moreover, Irans leaders are aware that a large number of their own people are disenchanted and disaffected with the government. An external war might offer a ripe environment for civil unrest.

Tehran might employ its asymmetric warfare capabilities; it may sporadically hit some targets in the Gulf with its missiles, or affect the global oil market by causing prices to rocket. But all these consequences are temporary and can be contained.

We should remember that the key objective of Irans ruling political establishment is to hold on to power. A Gulf war would be suicidal and have devastating strategic, political and economic consequences for Tehran.

So why does Irans Revolutionary Guard Corps provoke and make dangerous military manoeuvres in the Gulf?

First of all, Iranian leaders are attempting to set the tone with the Trump administration by resorting to the classic tactic of rhetoric and showing off.

In the past four decades, Iran has learnt that tactics such as harassing US ships or taking American navy hostages have always made the US back away.

Tehran is also attempting to show how strategically important it is. For Iran, projecting power over the Strait of Hormuz and reminding the world of its nuclear programme are the way to ensure the survival of the Islamic Republics political establishment from foreign threats.

Finally, Iranian leaders are attempting to appeal to the nationalistic sentiments of their own population. Broadcasting Iranian generals bragging about Irans power and how they forced the US to retreat is a powerful domestic tool.

Since 1979, Iranian media has directed headlines towards its "enemies" in the Gulf and beyond, and it has created a state of constant emergency regarding national security to divert attention from domestic problems such as economic mismanagement, poverty, corruption and unemployment.

Dr Majid Rafizadeh is an Iranian-American political scientist and president of the International American Council

The rest is here:
Iran's agitation in the Gulf hides defeat at home - The National

Jailed British-Iranian woman ‘dreams of watching daughter play’ – The Guardian

A photo of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe with messages reading free Nazanin, one year on from her detention. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PA

A British-Iranian woman jailed in Tehran for allegedly plotting to topple the government has said she dreams of watching her husband playing with their two-year-old daughter. As the first anniversary of her detention dawned, Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe described her wish to see her family dancing to Michael Jackson in in the sitting room of their home.

The 38-year-old was arrested at Tehran airport on 3 April 2016 while visiting relatives in Iran with her daughter, Gabriella. She was imprisoned for five years in September and lost an appeal against her sentence in January, but maintains her innocence. Her husband, Richard, said it had been a long year of separation, a year of our lives interrupted.

Although Zaghari-Ratcliffe has not been told the charges of which she was convicted, media reports in Iran say she is accused of being one of the chief members of networks of adversary institutions, who with the direction and support of foreign media and espionage services has committed her criminal acts over the past few years.

However, her family said that she works for the Thomson Reuters Foundation, which does not operate any charity projects in the country.

The charity workers daughter, Gabriella, remains stranded in Iran, cut off from her British father, after Iranian officials confiscated the childs British passport. The toddler is currently being cared for by her maternal grandparents.

On Sunday 365 days since her arrest family and friends gathered at Fortune Green close to Zaghari-Ratcliffes home in Hampstead, north-west London. Supporters tied yellow ribbons to a tree in the park along with quotes from prisoners at Evin jail in Iran, where Zaghari-Ratcliffe is being held, describing what they would do with one day of freedom.

Zaghari-Ratcliffes wish reads: My fondest dream has always been to arrive at our home. You ask me if I want to have a cup of tea, then make me one. I just sit back and watch you two play. This is the image I had most when in solitary confinement. How I wish I could watch you both dance in the middle of our sitting room to the Michael Jackson music like when Gabriella was only tiny.

She also said she would like to put a huge paper on the wall and draw a world in which there are no prisons, walls or fences and let Gabriella do the colouring. Her husband described the morning as a nice, positive event, and said: Were keeping an eye on the future, and one day this will be finished.

Read the rest here:
Jailed British-Iranian woman 'dreams of watching daughter play' - The Guardian