Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

Iran’s Regime Ramps up Coronavirus Warnings to Match Escalating Threat of Public Unrest – NCRI – National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)

Facebook Twitter LinkedInPinterestReddit

Iranian regimes anti-riot forces (file photo)

Iran is facing a third wave of coronavirus infections, according to the regimes Health Ministry. The mullahs Ministry of Health has acknowledged a series of record-breaking single-day death tolls since the middle of October, even when using the regimes engineered statistics.

The daily increases have raised Irans official death total to nearly 36,000. The official figure will continue to display only a fraction of the truth. According to the Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), which has been tracking the epidemic via its intelligence resources, the actual death toll is now over 142,000. This figure disrupts the notion of a third wave and instead suggests that the first wave of Irans infections never really ceased, because the regime never took meaningful action to address it.

The MEKs account is based on the hospital and mortuary records, as well as eyewitness testimony and records from Irans National Emergency Organization which indicate that domestic outbreaks were underway more than a month before regime authorities officially acknowledged them. But when faced with criticism, the regimes President Hassan Rouhani blatantly demanded credit for the admission, bogusly stating that the regime did not delay one day in revealing the public health threat.

In fact, the regimes sham parliamentary elections apparently provided the regime with incentive to finally own up to its early failures to contain the disease. The regimes sham parliamentary election met an unprecedented nationwide boycott, even though the regimes authorities extended voting hours on the day of the election after urging everyone to participate as a religious and patriotic duty. But just days removed from the acknowledgement of a coronavirus outbreak, those same authorities were ultimately forced to blame the low turnout on health concerns, not political disaffection.

It was vitally important for the regime to promote this narrative, given that the election took place only about a month after student protests that condemned Tehran for attempting to cover up an incident in which a commercial airliner was struck by a missile belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Perhaps even more significantly, that protest in turn took place less than two months after a nationwide anti-regime uprising during which the IRGC opened fire on crowds, killing over 1,500 peaceful, pro-democracy protesters.

The uprising itself was a sign of a growing public desire for regime change, as well as the increasing influence of the MEK, and its leading role during the uprising. Less than two years earlier, during another uprising in January 2018, mullahs Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei acknowledged that the MEK had played a major role in planning the demonstrations and popularizing slogans like death to the dictator.

The legacy of these uprisings certainly contributed to the low voter turnout last February, but the regime quickly seized upon the Covid-19 pandemic to muddy the waters on this issue. Afterwards, without undertaking any measures to seriously confront the crisis, the regime was also free to leverage it against the threat of further public demonstrations.

In the midst of the third wave it has become clear all over again that Tehran is keen to absolve itself of responsibility for slowing the spread, and to place it squarely on the people. The government has not acknowledged any of its own failings as reasons for the rising death tolls, but has proclaimed that ordinary citizens are not abiding by health experts recommendations. It has done this even in the absence of large-scale protests of the sort that defined the past two years. It is easy to imagine how the regimes authorities would demonize such demonstrations in the presence of a worsening outbreak.

If the outbreak had already begun before the end of 2019, why wait until six weeks into 2020 before citing the outbreak as incentive for disaffected Iranians to stay home? Its because January marked an all-important 40th anniversary celebration of the founding of the regime and authorities had gone to great lengths to organize public displays intended to counter the message of the mass protests.

State television cameras were trained on parades and gatherings that marked that anniversary, and the numbers of participants were reportedly padded by mandating attendance for government employees while providing free travel and other incentives to poor, rural families to travel into Tehran and other major cities.

Afterwards, acknowledging the coronavirus became not only an option but an imperative for the regime, as it promised to help stall the resumption of those protests. But of course, the regime couldnt very well acknowledge the full extent of the outbreak, especially in the wake of its stage-managed anniversary gatherings. Doing so would have revealed that authorities not only failed to contain an emerging public health threat but actually amplified that threat with super-spreader events that encouraged nationwide travel.

The very existence of those events goes a long way toward explaining and further legitimizing the MEKs death toll estimates. And as the Resistance continues to spread awareness of those estimates among a population that has already participated in multiple nationwide uprisings, the threat of further protest only continues to grow. This in turn explains why the regime has just now begun to acknowledge higher infection rates and death tolls. The worse the public health crisis appears, the easier it is for authorities to discourage political gatherings. In addition, the situation is worsened, is because of the regimes inaction.

Furthermore, the worse the crisis appears, the easier it is for some of those authorities to justify across-the-board crackdowns under the guise of preventing the spread of infection. Accordingly, responsibility for Irans coronavirus response has long been vested not in the Health Ministry but in the IRGC the very same force that killed 1,500 protesters at this time last year.

On October 31, Brigadier General Hossein Salami boasted to Iranian state media that a door-to-door operation will go underway in search of the coronavirus carriers. Naturally, the IRGC will be turning that operation into a series of instances of intimidation and unwarranted property searches. Indeed, this is exactly what should be expected, especially in light of the recent increase in reports of the IRGC attacking, humiliating, and even killing citizens on the streets of Iranian cities.

This phenomenon surely reflects growing concerns among regime authorities about the threat of renewed public unrest. And today, that threat comes not only from unresolved issues related to the past two years uprisings, but also from the regimes mismanagement of the very same public health crisis it has been trying to exploit to keep people from re-raising those issues.

See original here:
Iran's Regime Ramps up Coronavirus Warnings to Match Escalating Threat of Public Unrest - NCRI - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)

Analysis: Iran frets over US vote it insists doesn’t matter – Associated Press

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) Top officials in Iran say the upcoming U.S. election doesnt matter, but nearly everyone else there seems to be holding their breath.

The race for the White House could mean another four years of President Donald Trumps maximum pressure campaign. Or it could bring Joe Biden, who has raised the possibility of the U.S. returning to Irans 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.

In the upper levels of Irans Islamic Republic, overseen by 81-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, anti-Americanism is as deeply entrenched as at any time since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, with presidents from both parties seen as equally repugnant.

America has a deep-rooted enmity against the Iranian nation and whether Trump is elected or Biden, it will not have any impact on the U.S. main policy to strike the Iranian nation, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said in September, according to the semi-official Fars news agency.

But noticeably, Khamenei himself hasnt commented on the election, even as public interest has soared. State-run radio rebroadcast a BBC Farsi-language service simulcast of the presidential debates live even as Iran continues to target journalists for the British broadcaster.

That interest allegedly includes Irans security apparatus as well. U.S. officials accuse the Islamic Republic of sending emails to voters seeking to intimidate them into voting for Trump. It may have been an attempt to link the president to apparent election interference in order to sow chaos, like Russias interference in Americas 2016 election. Tehran denies being involved.

The Iranian public is paying attention. The state-owned polling center ISPA said this month that 55% of people believe the outcome of the election will affect Iran a lot. Over half expected Trump would win, while a fifth said Biden. ISPA said it surveyed over 1,600 people by telephone, and did not provide a margin of error.

Trumps re-election would mean the extension of his pressure campaign, including sanctions on Khamenei and other senior officials. Some of the sanctions are largely symbolic Khamenei has only once traveled to America and doesnt hold any U.S. bank accounts but others have devastated the economy and sent the local currency into freefall. As a hedge, Iranians have poured money into foreign currency, real estate, precious metals and the stock market which hit a record high in August.

Trump on the campaign trail has hit on that and his decision to launch a drone strike that killed a top Iranian general in January a move that led Tehran to launch a retaliatory ballistic missile strike, wounding dozens of American troops.

To cheers, Trump has described the general, Qassem Soleimani, as the worlds No. 1 terrorist, likely due to him being blamed for the improvised explosive devices that maimed U.S. troops in Iraq and for supporting Syrias President Bashar Assad. Many Iranians revered Solemani for fighting against the Islamic State group and in the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, and millions flooded the streets for his funeral processions.

The first call I get when we win will be from the head of Iran, lets make a deal. Their economy is crashing, Trump told a campaign rally in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on Monday. They will call and I want them to do well, but they cannot have a nuclear weapon.

Biden has left open the possibility of returning to the nuclear deal, in which Tehran agreed to limit its uranium enrichment in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. The other signatories Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China have remained committed to the agreement and allowed a U.N. arms embargo to expire as part of the deal, despite a White House push to keep it in place.

After Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018 and restored crippling sanctions, Iran began publicly abandoning the agreements limits on enrichment. It now has at least 2,105 kilograms (2.32 tons) of low-enriched uranium, according to a September report by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Experts typically say 1,050 kilograms (1.15 tons) of low-enriched uranium is enough material to be re-enriched for one nuclear weapon.

Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and still allows IAEA inspectors to monitor its atomic sites. But experts say the breakout time needed for Iran to build one nuclear weapon if it chooses to do so has dropped from one year under the deal to as little as three months.

Iran in the past also has threatened to abandon a nuclear nonproliferation treaty or expel international inspectors. It recently began construction at an underground nuclear site, likely building a new centrifuge assembly plant after a reported sabotage attack there earlier this year.

America First has made America alone, Biden said at a televised ABC town hall this month, playing on a longtime Trump slogan. You have Iran closer to having enough nuclear material to build a bomb.

What a return to the deal means, however, is in question. Bidens campaign website says he would use hard-nosed diplomacy and support from our allies to strengthen and extend it. One criticism of the accord was its narrow focus on the nuclear program, despite concerns by the U.S., Israel and its Gulf Arab allies over Irans ballistic missile program and its presence in Iraq, Lebanon and Syria.

Iran maintains that its ballistic missile program is vital for deterring potential attacks and non-negotiable. It is also unlikely to cease its military activities in Syria and Iraq, where it spent considerable blood and treasure in the war against the Islamic State group.

But ensuring the survival of the Islamic Republic, particularly amid the coronavirus pandemic, may require the same flexibility that saw Iran agree to negotiations with the U.S. in the first place. Iran will hold a presidential election in June, but any decision to re-engage with Washington would have to be made by the supreme leader.

Khameneis revolutionary path actually leads to America that is, by seeking a stable, safe, and meticulously measured relationship with the United States, he believes he can guarantee the survival of both the regime and its revolutionary content and orientation, wrote Mehdi Khalaji, a Qom-trained Shiite theologian who is an analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Tehrans objective is therefore a scandalous paradox: Deal with America to remain anti-American.

___

EDITORS NOTE Jon Gambrell, the news director for the Gulf and Iran for The Associated Press, has reported from each of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Iran and other locations across the world since joining the AP in 2006. Follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/jongambrellAP.

Read more:
Analysis: Iran frets over US vote it insists doesn't matter - Associated Press

How Biden might tackle the Iran deal – Axios

Four more years of President Trump would almost certainly kill the Iran nuclear deal but the election of Joe Biden wouldnt necessarily save it.

The big picture: Rescuing the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is near the top of Biden's foreign policy priority list. He says he'd re-enter the deal once Iran returns to compliance, and use it as the basis on which to negotiate a broader and longer-lasting deal with Iran.

Breaking it down: Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal in 2018, restoring U.S. sanctions and piling on new ones under a maximum pressure campaign that has devastated the Iranian economy.

The European signatories to the deal France, Germany and the U.K. have been desperately trying to save it.

But the Trump administration is attempting to finish off the deal, in part by adding a thicket of sanctions that Biden might find politically painful to remove.

Iran's domestic politics may prove more challenging still. The "reformist" administration of President Hassan Rouhani has been badly burned, and hardliners are expected to take over following presidential elections next June.

Where things stand: There are obstacles demands that Iran might make, our own politics, the more complicated relationship that the U.S. now has with Russia and China so this is not going to be smooth sailing," Malley says.

It took Iran about six months to come into compliance with the JCPOA the first time says Ernest Moniz, the former energy secretary who played a key role in negotiating that deal.

That means the earliest Iran could return to compliance would be right around the time its next administration takes office.

Moniz says a revitalized JCPOA would provide the world with confidence that Iran is not building a nuclear weapons program its original purpose but would be insufficient.

In future negotiations, Moniz adds, "regional concerns will have to be more front and center."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was one of the loudest and most influential critics of the 2015 deal.

The Trump administration has demanded Iran negotiate on all of those fronts as part of any deal and claims it will be forced to if Trump is re-elected.

What to watch: Biden envisions almost precisely the opposite path to a broader deal with Iran, but acknowledges there's no guarantee Iran will even return to compliance with the JCPOA.

Go deeper: Biden's allies-first approach to China

Read the rest here:
How Biden might tackle the Iran deal - Axios

Iran’s Khamenei tweets about questioning the Holocaust; Congress asks Twitter about censorship bias – Fox Business

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey responds to Sen. Roger Wicker's question on tweets calling for the 'elimination of the Zionist regime' during the Big Tech hearings.

Supreme LeaderAyatollah Ali Khamenei of Iran questioned why some countries have criminalized Holocaust denial on Wednesday inan uncensored post toTwitter, which is facing scrutiny for how the social media platformhas censored posts, like a recent New York Post article on the Biden family's business and political connections.

"Why is it a crime to raise doubts about the Holocaust?"Khamenei tweeted Wednesday."Why should anyone who writes about such doubts be imprisoned while insulting the Prophet (pbuh) is allowed?"

Meanwhile, members the U.S.SenateCommerce Committee asked Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey about censorship bias.

Committee Chairman Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., asked Dorsey why Khamenei's tweets "questioning the Holocaust...remain unflagged on Twitter's platform" despite the platform's decision to label tweets from President Trump about mail-in ballots and COVID-19 with links to more context.

TWITTER DEFENDS NOT BLOCKING IRAN LEADER'S TWEETS AFTER BLOCKING TRUMP'S

Dorsey agreed that someone denyingthe Holocaust would be spreading misinformation but added that Twitter does not "have a policy againstmisinformation, we have a policyagainst misinformation in threecategories" includingmanipulating media, specifically coded publichealth topics like COVID-19,andelectioninterference and votersuppression.

Khamenei's tweets about the Holocaust, nor his tweets threatening Israel orthe U.S., require labels under those qualifications. But Holocaust denial is a crime in several countries, including Germany, Austriaand Israel. Holocaust denial is not a crime in the United States, however.

SEN. JOHNSON PRESSES TWITTER CEO FOR EVIDENCE OF DISINFORMATION IN HUNTER BIDEN STORY

Dorsey later defended Twitter's stance thatKhamenei's posts are mere "saber-rattling" -- a phrase Twitter officials haveused to defend its decisions to keep the Iranian supreme leader's posts visible and unlabeled.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who also called out Dorsey for leaving up the supreme leader's tweets on Wednesday,called foran investigation into Twitter in alettersent in May to the Justice and Treasurydepartmentsfor violating U.S. sanctions against Iran.

Cruz had sent a letter to the social media giant in February requesting that it comply with U.S. law and stop providing services to the accounts.

ZUCKERBERG 'NOT AWARE' THAT FACEBOOK ELECTION INTEGRITY OFFICIAL WORKED FOR BIDEN

"Twitter sent a letter back saying their company policy was to allow as much discussion as possible, and they apparently believe they are exempt from the criminal laws of this country," Cruz told FOX Business' "Varney & Co." at the time. "So today, I asked the Department of Justice to open an investigation. Those sanction laws are designed to stop U.S. companies from facilitating Iranian terror."

Republicansargued during the hearingthat Twitter's decisions to not label tweets fromKhamenei and other foreign leaders who condemn the U.S. on Twitter, such as Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lijian Zhao, represent a double standard when compared to its treatment of the president.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Democrats argued that Twitter and Facebook should be doing more to censor hate speech that could lead to violence.

Other tech and policy expertssay censoring more voices is not the solution to a more open internetand that social media platforms should avoid labeling or removing posts from anyone in an effort to encourage free speech online.

READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS BY CLICKING HERE

Here is the original post:
Iran's Khamenei tweets about questioning the Holocaust; Congress asks Twitter about censorship bias - Fox Business

Most voters think Russia, China and Iran are trying to influence the election – YouGov US

Followingreportsfrom Microsoft that it had blocked cyberattacksfrom Russia, China and Iranonthe presidentialcampaigns, the latestEconomist/YouGov poll finds that mostregisteredvoters think all three countries are trying to influence the election.

Three quarters ofregistered voters say they believeRussia is trying to manipulate the outcome, as do two-thirds forChina (67%),and six in ten forIran (61%).

Supporters ofPresident Trumpare especially likely (75%) to say they believe China is actively trying to influence the election, compared to three in five (62%)Bidensupporters.

In contrast, supporters of Democratic nominee Joe Biden are more likely (88%) than those who support Trump (60%) to say Russia is trying to influence next weeks election.

Theis no partisan difference when it comes to Iran,with63% of Biden supporters and 61% ofTrump supporters thinking the Middle Eastern nation is trying to affect the result.

Claims have previously been made by some on the Republican side that Ukraine had attempted to influence the 2016 presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton.Few believed thisa year ago(19%) and few believe thatthe Eastern European country is trying to manipulate the current election either(23%).

Asked who these countries would want to be leading the US,votersthinkChina (51%) and Iran (42%) would favor Joe Biden, while Russia (56%) wouldprefer DonaldTrump.In comparison, voters are split on whether Ukraine would favor Biden (28%) or Trump (25%).

Related:America Speaks: Are they worried about foreign interference in the 2020 US election?

Supporters of Donald Trump and Joe Biden see election interference on the horizon

See thetoplinesandcrosstabsfrom this weeksEconomist/YouGov Poll

Methodology:The Economist survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,500 registered voters interviewed online between October 25 - 27, 2020. This sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based on the American Community Survey, conducted by the US Bureau of the Census, as well as 2016 Presidential vote, registration status, geographic region, and news interest. Respondents were selected from YouGovs opt-in panel to be representative of all US citizens. The margin of error is approximately 3.1% for the overall sample.

Image: Getty

Read this article:
Most voters think Russia, China and Iran are trying to influence the election - YouGov US