Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

Iran Air Looks To Unground 7 Aircraft – Simple Flying

Iran Air has revealed plans to bring seven stored aircraft back into service thanks to the country's new-found domestic maintenance capabilities. The airline hopes to have the aircraft in the skies once more within six months.

Iran Air's CEO, Shamseddin Farzadipour, was quoted by the ILNA news agency as saying, "Our priority is domestic repair, and seven planes will become airworthy in the next six months," before adding that the aircraft would likely be used on busy routes to Iraq, catering for the large market of Iranian pilgrims visiting holy sites in the neighboring country.

As a result of sanctions that make carrying out repair work and sourcing spare parts more challenging, Iran Air has struggled to maintain its fleet of primarily Airbus aircraft. Thanks to a greater focus on domestic maintenance services over recent months, the airline now hopes to be in a position to return seven of its preciously-grounded aircraft to the skies.

Photo: Rebius | Shutterstock

The airline did not state exactly which aircraft would be returning to service, however, data from ch-aviation shows that nearly two-thirds of Iran Air's passenger fleet is currently grounded, including:

Iran Air's active fleet of 11 passenger aircraft is left to operate the airline's route network across the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. At the end of July, the carrier will increase the frequency of its longest route, Tehran (IKA) to London Heathrow (LHR), from three to four per week. Iran Air's other intercontinental destinations include Milan (MXP), Paris (CDG), and Hamburg (HAM).

Photo:Mehdi Photos | Shutterstock

Recognizing the need for investment in its aviation infrastructure, the Iranian Government has put aside funds to support the country's airlines in their efforts to get their aircraft back in the skies. A number of other Iranian carriers have reportedly already managed to return aircraft to service in this way, with Qeshm Air and Aseman Airlines bringing back an Airbus A320 and Boeing 737, respectively, in February this year.

In addition, the program has been expanded to offer maintenance and repair services to foreign airlines also struggling with sanctions. Unconfirmed reports last year suggested that a number of Russian aircraft had already been in Iran for maintenance work.

As well as bringing back older aircraft, Iran Air also intends to modernize its aging fleet - something that is much needed, given the average age of the carrier's fleet currently stands at 25.7 years old.

Photo: Vytautas Kielaitis | Shutterstock

Iran Air has a number of outstanding orders with Airbus, including 32 A320neos, 28 A330neos, and 16 A350s. The orders date back to 2016, but only a handful of aircraft were delivered before the US imposed sanctions on Iran in 2018.

What do you think of Iran Air's plans to bring seven of its stored aircraft back into service? Have you flown on the airline? Share your thoughts and experiences by commenting below.

Source: ch-aviation.com, Tasnim News Agency

View original post here:
Iran Air Looks To Unground 7 Aircraft - Simple Flying

Iran’s membership in Shanghai Cooperation Organization further … – Al-Monitor

Irans admission to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) this week further aligns the Islamic Republic with Russia and China, though it is unclear how much membership in the bloc will benefit the Islamic Republic.

Iran became a full member of the SCO on Tuesday at the organizations virtual meeting hosted by India, 18 years after it acquired observer status in the security and trade cooperation organization. Its application to become a full member was accepted in 2021. China, Russia, India, Pakistan and several Central Asian states are members of the SCO. The organization has additional dialogue partners and observers across the continent.

The membership comes as Iran is seeking better ties with Russia and China as well as Central Asia to break international isolation and sanctions from the United States and Europe. To this end, Iran's non-oil trade with SCO member states rose 31% to more than $17 billion from March to August of last year, according to the official Islamic Republic News Agency.

Becoming a full member of the SCO may be more symbolic than practically important to the Islamic Republic, however, according to Ryan Bohl, a Middle East analyst at the US risk intelligence firm RANE.

Iran's entry has greater symbolic significance in terms of alignment than it does of pragmatic importance. The SCO remains a loose-knit bloc of powers rather than a tightly bound alliance like NATO, Bohl told Al-Monitor.

The SCO has sometimes been called the anti-NATO, but its power is relatively limited, according to a September 2022 report from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Differences between member states have constrained the blocs policy coordination and regional integration since its inception. This is partly due to its insufficient bureaucratic capacity and its institutional design, wrote Nicole Grajewski for the think tank. The SCO is also governed by consensus, which limits substantive cooperation, the report said.

Bohl said the SCO has not developed into a vehicle with direct, tangible benefits for Iran, but Tehran may benefit in other ways from being part of the bloc, including by boosting Irans chances of joining the BRICS alliance. Iran notably attended the BRICS meeting in South Africa last month.

Iran may also enjoy better defense ties and possiblybetter arms deliveries with China and Russia thanks to its membershipin the bloc, he said, adding that cooperation between Iran and China on drones could also increase.

Iran supplies drones to Russia for use in the invasion of Ukraine, while China is a leader in global drone technology. Al Jazeera reported in January that China was the top exporter of combat drones in the past decade, citing data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Iran's entry signals that Tehran sees itself increasingly as aligned with a Russo-Chinese-led world order, which itself is an alteration to Iran's older, more nonaligned and Pan-Islamic worldview, Bohl argued.

Iran is not the only Middle Eastern state seeking stronger ties with the SCO. In March, Saudi Arabias Cabinet approved a decision to join the organization. Last May, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait became dialogue partners of the SCO.

Saudi Arabia and the UAEs desires to boost relations with the SCO will likely depend on their relations with Iran, according to Bohl.

Saudi/Emirati aspirations to increase their SCO ties will depend on how well they're getting along with Iran. Right now, with a more dovish atmosphere between them, if the Saudis and Emiratis want to move beyond dialogue partners, they have a diplomatic runway to do so, he said. But if there is a resurgence in hostilities, it would almost certainly mean that the Saudis and Emiratis would freeze their advancement process in the SCO, if not withdraw entirely.

The UAE resumed normal relations with Iran last year, while Saudi Arabia did so in March in a deal brokered by China. Saudi-Iranian relations have improved steadily since then, and Iran reopened its embassy in Riyadh last month.

Read the rest here:
Iran's membership in Shanghai Cooperation Organization further ... - Al-Monitor

Opinion | Why Iran and Cuba Turned Their Back on the U.S. – The New York Times

In 2014, that bet began to pay off. The Obama administration announced an end to Americas decades-long enmity with the Cuban government, and soon everyone from Conan OBrien to Andrew Cuomo to Steve Nash began showing up in Havana. As a University of Miami Cuba expert, Michael J. Bustamante, noted at the time, the American flag has even become the most stylish national standard, appearing on Cubans T-shirts, tights and tank tops.

Then Mr. Trump entered the White House and it all fell apart. In 2019, he imposed the harshest economic sanctions in more than a half-century. A month later, Cuba began rationing soap, eggs, rice and beans. Around that same time, according to The Wall Street Journal, Chinas surveillance network on the island underwent a significant upgrade (the Cuban and Chinese foreign ministries have denied reports of a Chinese surveillance facility in Cuba). Evan Ellis, a Latin America analyst at the U.S. Army War College, told The Journal that the deal is basically Chinese pay-to-play, adding that China gives money to Cuba it desperately needs, and China gets access to the listening facility. Last fall, China agreed to restructure Cubas debt and donate $100 million to the island. One reason Cuba still needs Beijings money is that the Biden administration has kept key Trump sanctions in place.

U.S.-Iran relations follow a similar pattern. When the two countries signed the 2015 nuclear deal, Irans foreign minister at the time, Mohammad Javad Zarif, called it not a ceiling but a solid foundation. We must now begin to build on it. Irans leaders, like Cubas, hoped better relations with the United States would spur Western investment. Although some Iranian hard-liners feared that economic ties to the West would weaken the regime, Mr. Zarif and President Hassan Rouhani gambled that a stronger economy would strengthen Irans regional position and defuse popular discontent, thus helping solidify the countrys despotic political system.

It didnt work out that way. Mr. Trump canceled the nuclear deal and reimposed harsh sanctions. Rather than re-enter the agreement on its first day in office, the Biden administration made additional demands, which helped thwart efforts to revive the deal. And as the prospect of substantial U.S. and European investment disappeared, so did Washingtons leverage over Irans relationship with Moscow. Iran now has little to lose by developing what a National Security Council spokesman recently called a full-scale defense partnership with Russia.

This isnt the first time the United States has driven smaller nations into the arms of its superpower adversaries. It did so during the Cold War. In his book Embers of War, Fredrik Logevall notes that until the late 1940s, Ho Chi Minh, the Vietnamese nationalist leader, believed the United States could be the champion of his cause of independence from France. During World War II, Mr. Hos rebel army, the Viet Minh, worked alongside the Office of Strategic Services, the precursor of the C.I.A., in Americas fight against Japan.

See more here:
Opinion | Why Iran and Cuba Turned Their Back on the U.S. - The New York Times

Ukraine Will Take Iran To The International Court Of Justice Over … – Simple Flying

Ukraine, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Sweden will go to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in their bid to hold Iran accountable for the downing of Ukraine International Airlines flight 752 in January 2020. The Boeing 737-800 crashed after being shot down by Iranian army personnel shortly after taking off from Tehrans Imam Khomeini International Airport (IKA), killing all 176 people onboard.

A few days ago, the International Coordination and Response Group for the victims of Flight PS752, including the UK, Ukraine, Canada, and Sweden, issued a joint statement after Iran published a technical report on the accident stating the downing of the aircraft was a human mistake.

The International Coordination and Response Group said,

We, the members of the International Coordination and Response Group for the victims of Flight PS752, representing Canada, Sweden, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom, note that no agreement on the organization of arbitration was reached between Iran and the Coordination Group pursuant to Article 14 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation.

Accordingly, the Group will pursue its collective effort to ensure Iran is held accountable for the downing of flight 752 by referring the dispute to the International Court of Justice as soon as is practicable, the group added.

Photo:Grand Warszawski/Shutterstock.

In January 2022, the Coordination Group had said that efforts to resolve the downing of the Ukraine International Airlines flight with Iran were futile. Ten Iranian army personnel were jailed earlier this year for their role in the accident. The primary defendant was sentenced to 13 years in prison: three years for downing the plane and ten years for disobeying orders. Nine other members were also found guilty of wrongdoing and were each sentenced to between one and three years in prison.

The tragedy took place on January 8, 2020. Ukraine International Airlines was operating a scheduled service from Teheran to Kyivs Boryspil International Airport (KPB). The airline employed a Boeing 737-800, registered as UR-PSR, for the service. At the time of the accident, the aircraft was 3.5 years old, having just been delivered in July 2016.

Onboard the aircraft, there were 176 people (167 passengers and nine crew members). Of this total, 138 were bound for Canada, with a connection in Kyiv, as many of them were Iranian Canadian students and academics.

Photo: Real_life_photo/Shutterstock.

Shortly after taking off, the plane crashed down after being taken down by the Iranian armed forces. At the time, there were heightened tensions in Iran following the killing of top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani by US forces in Baghdad, Iraq. Iran was on edge about possible attacks after it fired missiles at Iraqi bases housing US forces.

The United Commander had mistaken the Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 for a cruise missile and hit it with two missiles in contravention of the commanding center's order and without obtaining the necessary permit.

What do you think about taking Iran to the ICJ to hold it accountable for the downing of Flight 752? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Read the rest here:
Ukraine Will Take Iran To The International Court Of Justice Over ... - Simple Flying

Will Jordan be Irans next target? – The Hill

One of the pillars of Iran’s long-term strategy to destroy Israel is to encircle and strangle the Jewish state with proxy armies. This works particularly well targeting nations like Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen, whose governments are dysfunctional and corrupt and whose citizenry is in economic despair.

Combine this with asymmetric military and terror tactics and a good dose of decades-old incitement against Jews, and you get Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps-directed Popular Mobilization Units in Syria and Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen.

This has worked so well that it is only logical that Iran’s next victim would be the Kingdom of Jordan, a nation with profound socio-economic problems and endemic antisemitism. Jordan hosts millions of refugees and its disgruntled populace suffers from high unemployment. It sits strategically to the east of Israel and the West Bank, whose Palestinian citizens have never given up hope for a Palestinian nation “from the river to the sea.”

Jordan is listed by Freedom House as “not free.” Adam Coogle, deputy director of Human Rights Watch’s Middle East, writes that “despite the view of Jordan as a stable country, public discontent has become increasingly visible in recent years.” A visiting fellow at Brookings Doha, Yasmina Abouzzohour, said Jordan is best described as a “soft dictatorship,”

So why have the U.S. and Israel considered Jordan a stable, reliable ally? Good question.

In fact, Jordan is the next logical target of Iran in its crusade to demoralize Israelis, knowing winning a conventional war is not now in the cards. Iranian destabilization of the kingdom makes perfect sense, to create an environment where Iranian allies like Hamas and Islamic Jihad can flourish and destabilize the West Bank.

Ten years ago, when I asked Israeli political and security leaders what they would do if Jordan were attacked, I often heard they would put IDF soldiers in harm’s way to prop up King Abdullah II, as it was a vital strategic interest. Today when I ask that same question to Israelis, I rarely hear anyone recommending that option, even if Jordan is under intense pressure.

They still consider Jordan essential for strategic interests, but their willingness to fight for those interests has dramatically decreased.

The use of proxies allows the Iranians to claim plausible deniability that they aren’t involved in terrorizing Israel or Jews worldwide. Sadly, the Europeans believe this. They cannot hold themselves back from economic opportunities, even with a state sponsor of terror.

In the north, Iran controls Lebanon through its Hezbollah proxy. In Syria, the dysfunctional state reciprocates Iran’s support for its genocidal president by allowing the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps free rein to set up military posts on Israel’s border, purge Sunni Muslims from southern Syria, and transfer precision-guided missiles through Syria to Lebanon. To the West, Iran effectively controls, in whole or part, the Iraqi military and parliament.

In fact, Iraq can be considered a model for what Iran wants to do to control Jordan. As the headline of Michael Knight’s article in Foreign Affairs put it, “Iraq is quietly falling apart.” Iranian-controlled Popular Mobilization Units have been incorporated into the Iraqi army, and many Iraqi politicians are either too fearful to resist or outright supportive of Iran. This has turned Iraq into an Iranian hegemonic success story.

To Israel’s south and east, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad work closely with Iran in their shared goal to threaten Israel in a multi-front war. And far to the south, don’t forget about Yemen’s Houthis, under the direction of Iran. They too can be activated in a regional war, sending cruise missiles toward Tel Aviv, as they have attacked Saudi Arabia.

Where is Iran’s gaze now? Seth Frantzman writes that Iran is closely watching the results of its instigation in the clashes in the West Bank, primarily in Jenin. It is trying to destabilize the territories to create a power vacuum. “Iran seeks to not only move weapons to the West Bank but also create conditions to threaten Israel from multiple areas.”

To the east of a destabilized West Bank is Jordan, a poverty-stricken nation on Israel’s doorstep — a country we take for granted as stable because its westernized king makes his rounds in Washington, seeming the essence of the enlightened despot, talking up the supposed stability of his country.

So how would Iran destabilize Jordan to set the stage for a pro-Iranian regime — or, better yet, set up mobilization units to dominate the country, as they did in Syria?

Since Abdullah has control of his parliament and loyalty from his professional military, the most likely scenario is a ground-up approach, targeting Jordan’s vulnerable population. They will cultivate support among the poor, the ignorant, Islamists, the disgruntled majority of Palestinians, and the millions of displaced refugees from the Syrian and Iraqi wars, who have little hope for a better life.

Now is the time to help stabilize Abdullah and his “soft” authoritarian regime. Claiming it is stable while ignoring the reality would be a head-in-the-sane approach, not unlike President Jimmy Carter’s infamous characterization of the Shah’s Iran as “an island of stability.”

The U.S. must respond by leveraging Jordan’s dependence on our generous financial aid to warm relations between Israel and Jordan. Jordan receives more economic support from the U.S. than Egypt, a nation whose population is ten times as great. American assistance has more than doubled in less than ten years.

With American help, Jordan, Israel, and the UAE agreed to a deal for Jordanian solar plants to power Israel. Israel, in turn, will provide the parched Kingdom with water. New economic initiatives between the nations fostered by the U.S. are essential to allow Jordan to become economically self-sufficient.

Let’s redirect the $140 million of American aid we send to the Lebanese Armed Forces, who are under the thumb of Hezbollah, for economic development in Jordan.

Next, we must convince our European allies to ante up with financial aid to Jordan, as an Iranian-controlled Levant would be much closer to their doorstep.

Finally, we should remind the King that American support needs to be reciprocated. He must end the endemic anti-Semitism that pervades the Jordanian schools, media, mosques, and government, and which flies in the face of President Biden’s just-released anti-Semitism initiative. Without change, the incitement will one day backfire on his monarchy.

Eric Mandel is director of the Middle East Political Information Network.

See the rest here:
Will Jordan be Irans next target? - The Hill