Iran Qaher (Conqueror) F-313 Stealth Fighter/Bomber First Flight [ 480p ]
Release Date: 11/3/2014 5:25:00 PM - From Naval Air Forces, Public Affairs. SAN DIEGO (NNS) -- The Navy made aviation history Nov. 3 as an F-35C Lightning II... The Navy and Marine Corps...
By: Forca Manan
See original here:
Iran Qaher (Conqueror) F-313 Stealth Fighter/Bomber First Flight [ 480p ] - Video
People after Morteza Pashaei death Tehran Iran
https://www.facebook.com/abas.kurd0 https://twitter.com/abaskurd0.
By: ABAS KURD
View original post here:
People after Morteza Pashaei death Tehran Iran - Video
Shadow X-72 (Iran RQ 170 Drone)
Shadow X-72 --- Iran RQ 170 Sentinel Stealth Drone SSF - Shadow Special Forces - USR - United States of Resitance SSF - Shia Special Forces Axis of Resistance HEZBOLLAH AXIS...
By: NuclearY Atomz
Go here to see the original:
Shadow X-72 (Iran RQ 170 Drone) - Video
To the editor: Ray Takeyh conveys the view that a cagey Iran through the facade of negotiations continues its inexorable march to the bomb against a bumbling America blind to the reality. Rather than inexorable, Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons has proved to be one of the slowest and more incompetent efforts in history. ("Iran's vested interest in nuclear talks," Op-Ed, Nov. 11)
For the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain, France, Israel and India, it was a matter of years to translate desire into a working weapon. Other countries such as North Korea and Pakistan took longer. But Iran has been at it for decades. The combination of sanctions, restraints in trade, threats, intelligence, assassination, sabotage, investigation and, yes, negotiations, coupled with Iran's own limitations, have worked.
Contrary to "expert" estimates beginning in the late 1990s that Iran would have the bomb in the next five years, it has not happened.
There is no inevitability that Iran will become a nuclear-armed nation as long as Washington and others remain diligent in efforts to impede it. One way to do so remains a very well crafted and enforceable negotiated international agreement.
Bennett Ramberg, Los Angeles
The writer served as a policy analyst in the State Department's Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs in the George H.W. Bush administration.
Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion
Visit link:
Staying the course on Iran and nukes
If there's no deal, that would likely trigger additional sanctions from Congress. Last year, Sens. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., and Robert Menendez, D-N.J., co-authored a sanctions bill that has been held up by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., under pressure from the White House.
In January, however, when the 114th Congress is sworn in, Reid will be replaced by Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. A Republican staffer said Wednesday of the proposed sanctions, "that bill will definitely be on the agenda."
Read MoreVenezuela official tours Middle East, Russia to talk oil
The Kirk-Menendez bill has 60 co-sponsors, and because of the makeup of the incoming Senate and the fact that preventing Iran from having nuclear capabilities is a popular bipartisan issue, those 60 are likely to grow to a veto-proof 67 quickly.
That could mean a sharp increase in the price of oil.
Read the original here:
What Iran nuclear talks mean for oil