Archive for the ‘Iraq’ Category

Ending Iraq’s humanitarian crisis – Salon

Iraq, once the cradle of civilization, has and continues to experience one of the most horrific violent conflicts in modern history that defies any semblance of civilized humanity.

It is hard to imagine the mammoth death and destruction that has been inflicted on the Iraqi people by foreign powers and domestic terrorism.

Yet, the country can still overcome the horrors of the past 14 years, provided its leaders correctly reassess the changing regional and domestic dynamics and agree to allow all Iraqis, regardless of their sect and cultural orientation, to choose their own political and civil structure.

Appalling human cost

Since the invasion of Iraq by the United States and its allies in 2003,up to 500,000 civilianshave been killed. From 2006, there have been40,000 recorded terrorist attacksaveraging more than 7,100 deaths per year.

Nearly 225,000 persons have become refugees, and 3.1 million are internally displaced. The destruction of infrastructure and socio-economic dislocation created widespread hunger and disease, especially among the tens of thousands of children who are vulnerable and suffering from malnutrition.

All this human and material devastation culminated with the rise of ISIS that has ravaged the country, while the internal indiscriminate terrorism between Sunnis and Shiites continues unabated.

This tragedy is unfolding as the Iraqi government and people are still languishing in the shadow of death and ruin, wandering about the political wilderness in search of ways to piece the country back together in the wake of ISIS eventual defeat. These efforts, however, may well prove to be an exercise in futility.

Deep divisions

The Abadi government ignores the fact that the Iraqi Kurds are on the verge of establishing their own independent state following the upcoming mid-September referendum, and that the Sunnis will reject the status quo ante and never again subjugate themselves to the whims of a Shiite government in Baghdad.

Having suffered intense discrimination, oppression, and wanton violence perpetrated against them, especially during the eight years of the Maliki government, the Sunni community has long since concluded that their future wellbeing depends on their will and ability to govern themselves.

They are determined to follow the footsteps of their Kurdish counterparts by establishing autonomous rule as a prerequisite to ending Sunni-Shiite bloodshed.

The carnage between the two sides that started immediately following the 2003 Iraq war continues to rage, claiming the lives of hundreds each week. It is unlikely to abate as long as:

1. The Iraqi government and outside powers, including the United States, are still absorbed by the illusion of maintaining Iraqs geographical unity.

2. Shiite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia are waging a proxy war in Iraq to secure their geostrategic interests to become the regions hegemon.

The legacy of ISIS

In many ways, the rise of ISIS and its control over much of the Sunnis three provinces further deepens the Sunnis resolve to fight for their independence from any internal or external power.

In addition to the egregious mistreatment they have suffered under the Maliki government, the Sunnis endured the brunt of ISIS brutality and horrific ruling methods.

Children were affected the most, as they were witnessing the unspeakable cruelty of ISIS in real time. Children were recruited to commit the most heinous crimes; hundreds of thousands have been traumatized as they were forced to watch beheadings and the gruesome treatment of innocent bystanders suspected of committing petty crimes.

The liberation of Mosul offers a new beginning to build a promising future for Iraq. In that regard, I maintain that Iraqs strength rests on the three main sects becoming first politically independent from one another.

The central governments responsibility

The central government must support the establishment of an independent Sunni entity and amend the constitution to reflect the new political and territorial divisions.

Internally, the Iraqi government must address the endemic corruption which consumes nearly one third of the countrys revenue, establish a fair and impartial judiciary, engage in economic development, and refrain from infringing on the Kurds and Sunnis internal or external affairs as they put their own houses in order.

Given that the Sunnis three provinces have no oil, their economic development depends on securing their share of revenue by passing the long-anticipated oil law.

In addition to that, the new Sunni entity would need the financial support from the Gulf states, the United States and the European Union to become a viable entity.

The central Shiite-led government in Baghdad must not hold them hostage by denying them their legitimate share, thereby preventing them from establishing their own state. This would be the recipe for continuing bloodshed and destruction that will only deepen the gulf between them, to the detriment of the countrys future.

Wider implications

The benefits of this roadmap are enormous, as it will first impact directly on the future stability of Iraq, and bring an end to the proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran as they come to realize that neither can change the reality of Sunni-Shiite coexistence, both in Iraq itself and as neighbors.

This arrangement would also mitigate the Iranian threat, which the Gulf states and Israel view as the source of regional tension and violent conflict.

Moreover, it would significantly reduce militant activities, enhance regional security, and start a process of peace and reconciliation to end the revenge and retribution that would inevitably ensue, given the horrifying violence that they have inflicted on one another for the past fourteen years.

It is only when the Sunnis establish their own entity and build the infrastructure of an independent state will they feel empowered and confident to work closely with the Kurds and the Shiites as equals, which will pave the way for a functioning confederation between them at a later date.

The United States role

The role of the United States at this early stage is critically important. The United States must support the establishment of an independent Sunni entity, maintain residual forces throughout the transitional period, train and equip security personnel, rein in extremist groups, and guide the Sunnis in the development of a political structure consistent with their beliefs, culture and aspirations.

To be sure, the death and destruction from which the Iraqis have suffered during the past 14 years must come to an end.

Children have been affected the most; they have suffered from malnutrition, disease, and dislocation, with enduring psychological scars that will last a lifetime. Tens of thousands have been killed, and as many became orphaned, not knowing what happened to them and why.

It is time to end the Iraqi tragedy. Much of the healing and prospects for a better and more promising future is in the hands of the Iraqi people themselves it is they who must rise above sectarianism, and it is they who must chart their own destiny.

More:
Ending Iraq's humanitarian crisis - Salon

Canada to deploy up to 20 police officers to Iraq over two years – Times Colonist

OTTAWA The Trudeau government says it will send up to 20 police officers to Iraq as part of its commitment to fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

At the end of June, Canada extended its military mission in Iraq for another two years.

The police officers, both men and women, will support efforts to re-establish a local police presence in areas newly liberated from ISIL control and advise their Iraqi counterparts on issues such as gender, diversity and human rights.

There now are three Canadian police officers in Iraq, with a fourth going in the next month.

Others will be sent in gradually over the next two years.

Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland says the Canadian police will contribute to stability in the troubled country.

International Development Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau said the mission is in keeping with Canada's efforts to support women and girls, "who are among the most severely affected by the conflict in Iraq."

"This mission provides Canadian policewomen with a unique opportunity to train and advise Iraqi police officers and contribute positively to creating longer-term stability, security and prosperity," she said.

The rest is here:
Canada to deploy up to 20 police officers to Iraq over two years - Times Colonist

German Girl Who Joined ISIS in Iraq Shown Screaming in Footage of Capture – Newsweek

The teenage girl from Germany who joined the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) in Iraq has appeared in a video uploaded to YouTube that shows the moment Iraqi forces captured her in the northern city of Mosul.

The mobile phone footage shows 16-year-old Linda W. surrounded by Iraqi soldiers who have battled to liberate the city from ISIS for nine months. Two of the soldiersareholding her arms, and she screams as they shout at her. Iraqi troopshave accused her of being a sniper for ISIS.

Newsweek is withholding the girl'sidentity on account ofher age.

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

Iraqi troopsdiscovered Linda W.hiding in a tunnel in the Old City alongside other women who had joined ISIS, as well as an array of weapons.

The German press interviewed her after Iraqi forces transferred her to Baghdad for questioning, where she appeared to show regret for joining the group.

I just want to get away from here, she was quoted as saying by German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung, which also said that she had married an ISIS fighter in Mosul. I want to get away from the war, from the many weapons, from the noise.

She added: I just want to go home to my family.

Images surfaced of the German 16-year-old in Mosuls Old City after she was captured by Iraqi security forces. She left home to join ISIS last year. Twitter

German officials have visited the girl and said they are providing consular assistance to her and another woman who is a German national. If she remains in Iraq, she could face trial on terrorism charges that carry a maximum sentence of the death penalty.

Martin Schafer told The Times that the teenager is doing well given the circumstances and that Berlin is trying to find a good solution that corresponds to their interests.

Linda fled her hometown of Pulsnitz near the eastern city of Dresden last summer, telling her family she was going to visit a friend. Before leaving for the Middle East, she converted to Islam and contacted ISIS fighters via Internet chat rooms in the region.

German security services say more than 900 German nationals have left the country to fight for ISIS in the Middle East, at least a fifth of whom arewomen.

Last month, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared victory in the city where ISIS implemented its brutal brand of Sharia law over more than a million residents for three years. It was from the pulpit of the citys famous Al-Nuri Mosque that the groups leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghadi, declared the creation of its de facto semi-state in July 2014.

The rest is here:
German Girl Who Joined ISIS in Iraq Shown Screaming in Footage of Capture - Newsweek

Hold UNICEF Accountable for Falsehoods on Iraq | commentary – Commentary Magazine

The Democrats are consumed by in-fighting, though this is masked by endless expressions of anxiety over their opponents policies. To the extent that Democrats have identified a way to recover from an election that saw so many of their core voters defect or decline to cast a ballot, it has been to again appeal to the labor voter who couldnt care less about the American lefts addiction to identity politics. But the liberal activist class is ready to bolt if Democrats become a party that welcomesyuck!social conservatives again. Bernie Sanders and his semi-socialist wing is trying to excise centrism from the party by making support for government-run health insurance programs a litmus test, much to the consternation of Democrats tasked with winning back control of Congress.

Among the few things Democrats seem to agree upon is that their core message must be an anti-Trump message. Its the execution thats been the problem. Democrats are pretty sure that they will benefit from frustration with an unpopular executive and his partys failure to govern effectively. Beyond the broadest strokes, however, there is confusion among Democrats as to how they should go about making themselves an anti-Trump vehicle. The opposition party is occasionally guilty of leaving observers with the impression that they resent even having to make an effort.

Take, for example, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuels attempt to crystallize Democratic antipathy toward the Trump administrations illegal immigration policies into some sort of coherent and actionable prescription. The city is suing the Justice Department in the effort to prevent law-enforcement officials from withholding federal grant money as a result of its status as a sanctuary city.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions attempt to compel sanctuary citiesmunicipalities in which illegal immigrants have some reassurance about their status as residents so that they can maintain a cooperative relationship with local law enforcementhas encountered resistance in the courts. But the Trump administration is its own worst enemy on this matter, as well as most others. Democrats barely register as a nuisance, and they only have themselves to blame for that condition.

Democrats have yet to find a smart way to concisely explain why cities that dont fully cooperate with federal law enforcement should still expect to get federal grant money, wrote Axios reporter Jonathan Swan. Emanuel is trying to lead the way here.

Is there a good messenger for this message? Its certainly not Rahm Emanuel, who is under fire for overseeing a police force mired in accusations of corruption and anti-minority bias. Maybe its not the messenger; maybe its the message. Perhaps Democrats have failed to craft a compelling case against the GOPs antipathy toward sanctuary cities because they resent having to make an argument at all.

It is a welcome mat to racism, said Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal when an anti-sanctuary cities measure went before the House earlier this year. Amid debate in the House, Democratic Rep. Ted Deutch insisted that the GOPs proposed immigration plans were inhumane and un-American and merited no debate.

Surely these Democrats speak for many of their grassroots compatriots. If your opponents position is racist, it is also unthinking and, therefore, illegitimate. Why should anyone devote their time to crafting a compelling argument designed to counter a claim that is rooted in abject bigotry?

The idea that there is only one legitimate opinion on an issue is liberating. For those who convince themselves that theirs is the only righteous point of view, engaging their opponents would mean giving unacceptable opinions a platform they dont deserve.

There are not two sides of the issue of same-sex marriage rights, said BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith when defending his publications attack on two popular HGTV hosts on the mere suspicion they may harbor unspeakable opinions.

[T]here are some stories which do not have two sides, wrote former CNN producer Hardy Spire. The climate change debate is one of them.This claim, written in 2014, was made to reinforce the notion that Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn had no business debating with scientist Bill Nye. Nye now hosts a ludicrous Netflix program promoting multifarious notions of social justice while Blackburn chairs the U.S. House Energy Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.

The condescension that is now in vogue on the left that Trump voters must be convinced not to cast ballots against their interest (presuming their interests are best served by an ever-expanding welfare state and a crippling tax burden on their prospective employers) frees liberals from having to engage Trump supporters honestly. They have convinced themselves that anyone who doesnt share their point of view is the electoral equivalent of a pack mule.

For the left, this comforting contrivance has become a security blanket. Liberals have grown more convinced of the singular legitimacy of their beliefs even as they watch their works crumbling around them at an accelerating pace. Assuming bad faith in your political opponents is, though, a relatively painless way to go through life. Maybe thats all that really matters.

Go here to read the rest:
Hold UNICEF Accountable for Falsehoods on Iraq | commentary - Commentary Magazine

Iraq to hang 27 for IS Camp Speicher massacre – BBC News


BBC News
Iraq to hang 27 for IS Camp Speicher massacre
BBC News
An Iraqi court has sentenced to death 27 men for their involvement in the massacre of up to 1,700 soldiers by so-called Islamic State (IS) in June 2014. Twenty-five suspects were released because of a lack of evidence. It is the latest batch of death ...
Iraq sentences 27 men to death for roles in 2014 Speicher massacreWENY-TV
Iraq sentences 27 to death over Camp Speicher massacreDeutsche Welle
Iraqi court sentences 27 men to death for involvement in Speicher massacrePress TV
Xinhua -Kuwait News Agency -Business Standard
all 12 news articles »

View post:
Iraq to hang 27 for IS Camp Speicher massacre - BBC News