Archive for the ‘Iraq’ Category

Torture Works…to Produce Fake News (And That’s How We Got Into Iraq) – Common Dreams


Common Dreams
Torture Works...to Produce Fake News (And That's How We Got Into Iraq)
Common Dreams
I told this story back in 2005 but it is a good story, has held up, and bears repeating now that President Trump is again promoting torture as effective. Torture is a good way to get people to tell you what they think you want to hear so that you ...

and more »

Read this article:
Torture Works...to Produce Fake News (And That's How We Got Into Iraq) - Common Dreams

Iraqis who risked lives helping U.S. in Iraq fear being left stranded by Trump refugee ban – Globalnews.ca

NEW YORK (Reuters) Iraqis who say their lives are in danger because they worked with the U.S. government in Iraq fear their chances of finding refuge in the United States may vanish under a new order signed on Friday by President Donald Trump.

The order temporarily suspends the United States main refugee program and halts visas being issued to citizens of several predominantly Muslim countries, including Iraq. It is expected to affect two programs U.S. lawmakers created a few years after the 2003 invasion of Iraq to help the tens of thousands of Iraqis who risked their lives helping Americans.

READ MORE:Trump signs order barring many refugees, but Syrian Christians may receive priority

Trump says the order is necessary to prevent Islamist militants from coming to the United States posing as refugees, but refugee advocacy groups say the lengthy screening of applicants by multiple U.S. agencies makes this fear unfounded.

Iraqis coming to the United States under the Special Immigrant Visa program for Iraqis, which stopped accepting new applications in 2014, or the ongoing Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis are losing hope of ever getting out.

Mr. Trump, the new president, killed our dreams, said one Baghdad man whose wife worked for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as a bookkeeper.

WATCH:No ban, no wall, New Yorkers for all: council on American-Islamic relations organizes protest Trumps orders on immigration

I dont have any hope to go to the United States, he said in a telephone interview, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by Iraqs Sunni and Shia militant groups and also of unfavorable treatment by the Trump administration.

More than 7,000 Iraqis, many of them interpreters for the U.S. military, have resettled in the United States under the Special Immigrant Visa program since 2008, while another 500 or so are still being processed, according to State Department figures. Another 58,000 Iraqis were awaiting interviews under the Direct Access program, according to the International Refugee Assistance Project. Tens of thousands have already arrived under the second program, but no recent total was available.

READ MORE:How Donald Trumps immigration policies could impact Canada

A lot of translators were trying to get the hell out of there because they had a mark on their head for working with U.S. forces, Allen Vaught, a former U.S. Army captain who went to Fallujah in western Iraq in 2003, said in a telephone interview. Theyre viewed as collaborators.

He fears the order would endanger American troops by making it harder to recruit local support in war zones, a belief echoed by several advocacy groups working on behalf of Americas Iraqi employees.

While in Iraq, Vaught employed five local interpreters who initially earned $5 a week traveling with troops, sometimes without weapons or armor. He helped two of the interpreters come to the United States as refugees with their families, putting them up initially in his home in Dallas, Texas. Another two were executed by militia groups, he said.

WATCH:Islamic radical terrorism needs to be eradicated just off the face of the Earth: Trump

The fifth was still mired in the refugee screening process, which can last months or years even after the initial interview. Vaught had expected to also welcome him into his home this year before he had seen a draft of Trumps order.

This executive order is based on ignorance and fear, he said. And you do not lead a country with ignorance and fear.

IRAQIS STRANDED

In Baghdad, the Iraqi man waiting for a visa recalled U.S, soldiers had laughed at his concerns, telling him the United States is too big a democracy to be changed on the decision of one person like Trump, he said. But he now wonders if the soldiers were right.

In 2013, a USAID official encouraged his family to apply as refugees under the Direct Access program. He checked in every week or so, but is still waiting word on an appointment at the U.S. consulate for the necessary interview.

WATCH:Islamic group calls Trumps anti-Muslim immigration plan a fearmongering tactic

The same year he filed his application, he was shot in the head while driving to work, hospitalizing him for a month and leaving him deaf in one ear. He connected that to the threats that had often flashed as text messages on his cellphone, sent by Islamist militants angered by his wifes work for USAID.

Others in Iraq remained hopeful they would eventually get out.

READ MORE:Israel ramps up West Bank settlement-building after Donald Trump inauguration

An Iraqi man who worked for a U.S. defense contractor and later alongside U.S. troops as a mid-ranking Iraqi Army officer, recalled his excitement at getting the phone call a few weeks ago telling him that his family had an interview appointment at the U.S. consulate after two years and four applications.

He was hopeful it would still take place in mid-February, believing that American officials would be concerned about the threats to his family. He was unaware that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday temporarily halted trips by staff to interview applicants.

I believe this is politics, things you hear on the news, he told Reuters by phone from Baghad on condition of anonymity. I dont think they would prevent Iraqis coming to America.

Originally posted here:
Iraqis who risked lives helping U.S. in Iraq fear being left stranded by Trump refugee ban - Globalnews.ca

Is Trump hoping to seize Iraq’s oil reserves? – CBS News

WASHINGTON -- No one knows how seriously to take President Donald Trumps threat to seize Iraqs oil.

Doing so would involve extraordinary costs and risk confrontation with Americas best ground partner against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), but the president told the CIA this weekend, Maybe youll have another chance.

The recycled campaign comment is raising concerns about Mr. Trumps understanding of the delicate Middle East politics involved in the U.S.-led effort against extremist groups. Mr. Trump has said he was opposed to the 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Husseins dictatorship. But on the campaign trail and again on Saturday, the day after his inauguration, he suggested the costly and deadly occupation of the country might have been offset somewhat if the United States had taken the countrys rich petroleum reserves.

Play Video

On a visit to CIA headquarters on Saturday, President Donald Trump shifted the focus of his remarks to his inaugural attendence and the media. CB...

To the victor belong the spoils, Mr. Trump told members of the intelligence community, saying he first argued this case for economic reasons. He said it made sense as a counterterrorism approach to defeating ISIS because thats where they made their money in the first place.

So we should have kept the oil, he said. But, OK, maybe youll have another chance.

The statement ignores the precedent of hundreds of years of American history and presidents who have tended to pour money and aid back into countries the United States has fought in major wars. The U.S. still has troops in Germany and Japan, with the permission of those nations, but did not take possession of their natural resources.

Taking Iraqs reserves, the worlds fifth largest, would require an immense investment of resources and manpower in a country that the United States couldnt quell after spending more than $2 trillion and deploying at one point more than 170,000 troops.

Play Video

U.S.-backed Iraqi forces are making gains against ISIS in Mosul, which has been an ISIS stronghold since 2014. CBS News made it into recently-lib...

U.S. enemies and friends would oppose the move. While Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has accepted U.S. help to retake ISIS-held territory in his country, he has repeatedly asserted Iraqi sovereignty. He said of Mr. Trumps oil vow in November, I am going to judge him by what he does later.

Asked about Mr. Trumps comments, al-Abadi told an Iraqi television channel on Tuesday, It wasnt clear what he meant.

Did he mean in 2003 or to prevent the terrorists from seizing Iraqs oil? It was not clear to us, but definitely Iraqs oil is constitutionally the property of the Iraqis and anything on the contrary is unacceptable, the Iraqi leader said. I do not think that there is any official in the world who can claim something that he does not have.

Asked about the matter on Monday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer stressed Mr. Trumps economic argument.

We want to be sure our interests are protected, he told reporters. Were going into a country for a cause. He wants to be sure America is getting something out of it for the commitment and sacrifice it is making.

Play Video

President-elect Donald Trump is feuding with outgoing CIA director John Brennan, who said Trump's off the cuff style of speaking and tweeting is ...

There is uncertainty as to where Mr. Trumps idea derives from, though the president has noted that taking the oil is something I have long said. Hints of this notion existed in some of the pre-2003 rhetoric from the Bush administration about the Iraq war paying for itself. But top advisers to President George W. Bush have stressed how the future of Iraqs resources were pointedly left out of decision-making related to the invasion so as not to fuel a perception that the war was driven by oil concerns.

Bush almost bent over backwards not to make a special effort to gain access for us to the oil resources, John Negroponte, who was Bushs director of national intelligence, told CNN.

Regarding Mr. Trump, former CIA Director and Defense Secretary Robert Gates told NBC, I have no clue what hes talking about.

Taking the oil would require a permanent U.S. occupation, or at least until Iraqs 140 billion barrels of crude run out, and a large presence of American soldiers to guard sometimes isolated oil fields and infrastructure. Such a mission would be highly unpopular with Iraqis, whose hearts and minds the U.S. is still try to win to defeat groups such as ISIS and al Qaeda.

This is totally wrong, said Zaher Aziz, a 42-year-old owner of a market stand in Irbil. They came here by themselves and occupied Iraq. And now they want the Iraqis to pay for that?

Play Video

There's been a new focus in the U.S.-led coalition's bombing strategy to target more of ISIS oil infrastructure, which is thought to be generatin...

However unrealistic Mr. Trumps suggestion, intelligence officials believe more has to be done to cut off ISIS oil revenues. The group seized significant oil when it stormed across Syrias border in 2014 and seized the city of Mosul and large swaths of Iraqi territory. The Treasury Department estimated that ISIS raked in $500 million from oil and gas sales in 2015. That figure is likely lower now as a result of U.S.-led operations, but officials say oil continues to fund the groups recruitment and far-flung terrorist activities.

In terms of oil helping establish ISIS, of course thats oversimplification, said Hassan Hassan, co-author of the book ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror.

He said oil was a small part of the groups origins and early years, when it morphed from an al Qaeda branch to an organization claiming a worldwide caliphate.

Read more from the original source:
Is Trump hoping to seize Iraq's oil reserves? - CBS News

In Iraq, America’s Allies and Its Enemies – Are Nervously Waiting for Donald Trump’s First Move – New York Magazine

Yasser, a 19-year-old member of ISIS who was captured by the peshmerga, sits in the wardens office at a prison in Kirkuk. Photo: Sulome Anderson

A blindfolded, handcuffed youth in a brown hoodie shuffles into the wardens office at a prison in Kirkuk, Iraq, and sits in a tattered chair. The prisoner, Yasser, is slim and dark-skinned, with wispy facial hair. Hes only 19 years old, but Yasser is a member of the Islamic State.

Until recently, he worked as a weapons smuggler, driver, and personal assistant to Khalil Ahmad Ali al-Wais, a.k.a. Abu Wadhah, the ISIS emir in charge of territory the group holds near Kirkuk. When a U.S. coalition airstrike killed Abu Wadhah earlier last month, Yasser was left without a protector, so he tried to flee ISIS. The peshmerga, the Kurdish fighting force in northern Iraq, received intelligence on his movements and arrested him upon his arrival in Kirkuk.

The Islamic State says America is our enemy and a country of unbelievers, Yasser says, in a pubescent-sounding voice, when asked about ISISs position on Donald Trump becoming president. Since they first came, they said that their philosophy is to trigger a big conflict between Muslims and America. An American president who goes on television and says he hates Muslims is a good thing for ISIS. They are using this to tell people, Look, the Americans hate Muslims, you must go fight and kill them.

The war against ISIS in Iraq received a significant amount of debate during the American presidential race, though Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton spoke about the conflict in notably different terms. Although Clinton expressed her intention to step up an American military presence in the region, she stopped short of advocating for a ground invasion. Her approach, if a bit more hawkish, seemed to largely line up with Barack Obamas slow-burn strategy to degrade and ultimately destroy the brutal Sunni militant group. Today, with Obamas strategy still in place for the moment even though he is out of office, U.S.-supported forces continue to fight to free Mosul, the last major Iraqi city under ISIS control. It has been a slow, steady, and quiet plan; one that has succeeded in shrinking ISISs footprint without alienating any of the key players in Iraq including the Iraqi army, the Shia militias that fight alongside government troops, and the peshmerga in the north or turning them against each other.

As for Trump, its difficult to divine a coherent Iraq strategy based on statements he made during his campaign and first few days in office, but all indications are that it will involve bringing a lot more drama to a country thats always on the precipice of mass sectarian violence. He has advocated for the deployment of up to 30,000 troops in Iraq and discussed at length his objectively absurd plan to take Iraqs oil as reimbursement for American military efforts a thought he reiterated as president during his freewheeling speech at CIA headquarters last weekend and again in his interview Wednesday with ABCs David Muir. Trump told Muir that critics who questioned the legality of the move were fools, and said: If we took the oil, you wouldnt have ISIS. Trump has also roundly criticized Obamas strategy in the ongoing battle for Mosul, saying that the U.S. should not have abandoned the element of surprise by publicly announcing the offensive months ahead of time (though military strategists tend to see it as irrelevant to the progress of the battle). In his first press briefing on Monday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer reiterated that Trump will not reveal his military plans for Iraq before undertaking them.

So as we enter the Trump administration, any expectations that his bellicose campaign rhetoric about Iraq and ISIS were just bluster seem to be unfounded. In his inaugural speech, Trump spoke of eradicating radical Islamic terrorism from the face of the earth, and creating a plan of attack against ISIS is reportedly among his highest priorities in the coming weeks. The early indications suggest the plan will be aggressive on James Mattiss first day as secretary of Defense, the U.S. bombed ISIS no fewer than 31 times.

The current political and military situation in Iraq is dizzyingly complex and unfamiliar to most Americans, as is the environment that Trump would be sending those 30,000 hypothetical U.S. soldiers into as part of a mission to eradicate ISIS and seize the oil wells under their control (zero, for the record). In an effort to get a better grasp of how the new administrations actions might affect Iraq and the various players in the ongoing, low-grade civil war there, I traveled to northern Iraq last month to speak with fighters on all sides. Some were enthusiastic about Trumps aggressive stance, hoping it would lead to further American involvement in the country. Others were wary of another U.S. invasion and the chaos it might trigger. Based on what Yasser told me, ISIS straddles those two positions: enthusiastic about the new American president precisely because they expect Trump to amplify the violence and bloodshed in Iraq and beyond.

At a military base in the town of Makhmur, 30 miles southwest of the Kurdish capital of Erbil, members of a mixed-sect group of militias under the auspices of the Iraqi government are practicing their drills under the hard-eyed gazes of several U.S. special-forces soldiers. The militia members march ostentatiously as thunderous patriotic music blares from speakers across the grounds. They are chaotically out of step, arms flailing as they march which would be funny if these young men werent headed into battle soon.

The Nineveh troops are part of a broad group of mostly Shia militias known as the Popular Mobilization Units, or PMUs, which have been causing ulcers in Washington because of their close ties to Iran as well as reports that theyve been engaging in sectarian violence against Sunnis fleeing liberated ISIS territory. All the PMUs were recently absorbed into the Iraqi military. While some groups, like the Nineveh militias, began training with American forces, the U.S. has refused to provide strictly Shia PMUs with air support, since any coordination with Iran-backed groups would trigger enormous political controversy.

According to their leaders and Iraqi army officials overseeing the ceremony, the groups marching today are mixed Sunni, Shia, Christian, and even some Yazidis, the northern ethnic group that was devastated when ISIS spilled into Iraq in 2014. These fighters dont exude the kind of iron discipline displayed by most Iranian-trained military forces, and the American officers appear increasingly horrified at the Nineveh groups fumbling during the drills.

But their reaction is not shared by Karim Shwaily, the commander of the Nineveh Hashd al-Shaabi militias. In his office the day after the ceremony, Shwaily is enthusiastic about the coordination with U.S. special forces. I think the operation is going positively, he says. God willing, we will soon take the eastern part of Mosul and all of the city will be under the control of Iraq.

Asked how he anticipates U.S. strategy in Iraq will change now that Trump is president, Shwaily seems extremely reluctant to offer his thoughts.

We are just fighters, he says sharply. We dont know anything about American politics or the strategies of U.S. presidents. Our mission is clear: to fight for Nineveh and for Iraq. But America will not invade Iraq again. There have been diplomatic agreements made and they have to abide by them on the other hand, it would be impossible to abandon Iraq at such a crucial point in the fight against Daesh as ISIS is known in the region. But I think Trumps talk of invading is just rhetoric.

Like the Nineveh Hashd al-Shaabi, its not quite clear where the Iraqi army officially stands on Trump, but theyre reportedly quite displeased after his last reference to taking their oil as reimbursement for American military efforts. Though the military may have initially welcomed an American invasion to rid Iraq of ISIS, they seem to be catching on to the fact that this invasion would not be like the others, because it would be led by Donald Trump. A strong American effort to fight ISIS is one thing; a lengthy occupation for the purposes of exploiting Iraqs natural resources is another. But for the moment, the Iraqi army seems to be caught in limbo, waiting to see how this president will treat their vulnerable, war-ravaged country.

Shwailys (perhaps misplaced) optimism and caution about saying anything that might provoke the new administration is shared by an Iraqi army general at the ceremony. Coalition forces have been here for seven days, he says. We have two active operations with the Americans: liberating Mosul and now we are preparing for the second operation, which is to train these fighters. There are other bases like this, where U.S. Special Forces are training them and another thousand trainees coming up. The Americans are very helpful in coordinating with us, and we dont see that changing now that the election is over.

But an invasion is not their only concern. Trump has been crystal clear that hes not interested in spending American treasure rebuilding or remaking foreign countries. Setting aside the question of immediate military actions, theres also the issue of ongoing support for the fragile regime now in power in Iraq. Another scenario is this: says retired Lieutenant General Mark Hertling, an Iraq war veteran and military analyst. Mr. Trump has indicated that hes willing to be more isolationist If Iraq does succeed soon in Mosul, and it is now time for them to shift toward their own nation-building and we dont provide strategic support, somebody else will We have to [help] rebuild their country under a good central government in Baghdad. If we leave that as a vacuum, it will just fall apart all over again like its done so many times already.

Awards from the United States government and military decorate nearly every inch of wall space in the office of Sarhad Qader Mohammad, brigadier general in the Kirkuk police force, a law-enforcement wing of the Kurdistan Regional Government. The general is hearty and mustachioed, brimming with praise for America. While Kurdistan is not quite an independent country, it has been functioning as one since the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. There is no small amount of hope in the region that Trump, with his incautious, no-holds-barred stance on Iraq, will allow Kurdistan to fully separate into a sovereign nation a centuries-old dream of the Kurdish people, but one that would create massive geopolitical problems in the region and that is staunchly opposed by U.S. ally Turkey.

The Americans know how strategically important and sensitive Kirkuk is, so we trust them to help us keep it safe in the future, Mohammad says. Many American soldiers were killed fighting for Kirkuk, and we are thankful for their sacrifice. The U.S. gives us much aid, including training and infrastructure; if I were to spend all day talking about what theyve done for us, I wouldnt be able to finish.

Asked if he anticipates that U.S. policy will change under Trump, he smiles confidently.

I think Trump will have to live up to what he told his people, Mohammad says. Obamas strategy was to stay distant from the fight, but America was the first one hurt in the war with terrorists during 9/11. We will see what Trumps strategy is, but America is responsible for the safety of the world, and an invasion would help the Kurds, because the peshmerga was the first army fighting Daesh with the Americans.

Trump has been quite vocal in his approval of the Kurds. I am a big fan of the Kurdish forces, he pronounced last summer, indicating that he wanted to get Kurdish leaders in a room with Turkish leaders for some negotiations quite a tall order for anyone who understands the depth of that enmity. In any case, it seems the peshmerga are betting that a hawkish Trump administration will be generous enough to grant them independence after the dust settles in the wake of a potential large-scale American ground offensive.

The elderly warden at Yassers prison shares this perspective. I think the entire American strategy is going to change, he croaks gleefully. In my opinion, Trump is better than Hillary Clinton because he likes the Kurds. He will be better for the peshmerga, especially if he invades. Both he and Hillary said they will support us, but Trump will be stronger.

But while it might create a great photo op or tweet, the long-term implications of any such generous gesture from Trump could be very serious. The question of Kurdish independence will be another source of friction once the war calms down and Kurds and Iraqi Arabs no longer have a common enemy, says Dr. Jeffrey McCausland, a veteran and professor at the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Of course, nothing Trump has said so far indicates any plan, much less awareness, of how hell prevent the region from tumbling deeper into chaos after the extremists are eradicated and the oil is taken.

In October 2016, ISIS militants set fire to the Qayyarah oil fields, about 35 miles south of Mosul. The inferno has been blazing ever since, with little hope of being extinguished anytime soon, and the village itself exists under a noxious, billowing cloud of dark smoke. At an intersection on the outskirts of town, a charity van pulls up to a mob of filthy children in rags and workers get out and begin distributing food. The children immediately begin to fight over the fruit and bread. A little girl no older than 6 or 7, wearing a shredded pink Minnie Mouse shirt, punches an older boy in the stomach and triumphantly makes off with an orange.

A short distance away, at an outpost of the Badr Organization, one of the Iran-linked Shia Hashd al-Shaabi militias that have proven so politically sensitive for the U.S., two fighters sip from little glasses of syrupy black tea. The Badr Organization was born during the 1980s and led uprisings against Saddam Hussein during the 2003 Iraq war. In the aftermath of Saddams ouster, the militia has grown in size and influence, with the help of Iran. The Badr Organization now claims to command between 10,000 and 50,000 men. The group was implicated in reports of sectarian war crimes following the liberation of Fallujah in 2016, though they deny responsibility.

Its clear that the Shia militiamen are significantly more apprehensive about a Trump presidency than their peers in the Nineveh Hashd al-Shaabi, Iraqi army, and peshmerga. Given Trumps aggressive rhetoric on Iran, their wariness is understandable.

Obama is weak and wasnt hard on the terrorists, says one of them, a thickly bearded man wearing a green beanie. We heard that this president will be stronger, so we know everything will change. But we also know he doesnt distinguish between Daesh and us. He thinks were terrorists because were supposed to be on the side of Iran.

The oil wells here are decrepit and damaged, his tall, thin friend adds. I have heard that this President Trump wants to come, rebuild the oil refineries and take our oil. He also says he will fight Iran and Saudi Arabia. In my opinion, one man cannot do something like that, because he will be responsible for destroying the world.

The fighter in the green beanie lights a thin Iraqi cigarette and finishes his tea. The peshmerga and the Iraqi army like Trump because they know they will benefit from an invasion, he says, flicking ash into his empty glass. But we know if theres an invasion, were not going to benefit. We will end up in a conflict with America.

Its obvious that the Trump administration will be facing some complicated obstacles in Iraq over the upcoming months and years. McCausland of the U.S. Army War College says that the real challenge begins after ISIS is defeated: ensuring that history doesnt repeat itself, that the country doesnt spiral into another sectarian conflict, perhaps leading to the establishment of ISIS 2.0. Defining success as beating ISIS, which seems to be a focal point of the Trump administration and a lot of the folks hes picked for national security offices, isnt good enough, he says. Can he in any way improve what has been the real problem in Iraq, which is continued friction between the Shiites and the Sunnis, in the aftermath of the ISIS occupation?

According to Yasser, Trump is one bright spot in what is an otherwise bleak and besieged existence for ISIS at this moment. The 19-year-old shuffles his feet around and fidgets with his handcuffs, looking like a restless kid in math class as he tries to explain the terrorist groups enthusiasm for the new U.S. president.

A president like Trump will drive Muslims towards the Islamic State and show them that all the kuffar the unbelievers hate them, Yasir says without expression. It makes the Islamic State happy to use him to manipulate the people who want to fight for Islam.

Trump Aides Keep Leaking Embarrassing Stories About How He Cant Handle Embarrassment

D.C. Dress Shop Is Reportedly Having a Sale Because So Many Inauguration Dresses Are Left Over

He ordered them to produce more photos of the Mall, and complained about the agencys retweets.

In discussing the U.S.-U.K. special relationship she stressed the importance of NATO and of dealing with Russia from a position of strength.

Donald Trumps chief White House strategist declares war on the press.

Now at least Trump has less money to play with.

Sean Spicer explained the House GOPs border-adjustment tax poorly. The media assumed the worst. Fake news ensued.

Newt couldnt make it into the Trump administration but his wife may be able to.

Analysts estimate it could cost as much as $20 billion.

Republicans meeting in Philadelphia were confused about their agenda and in dire need of presidential guidance. Instead they got a campaign speech.

But no mass deportation.

Rex Tillerson will begin his tenure at the State Department with no one experienced at managing its bureaucracy to guide or constrain him.

The White House visit is off, and tensions are hitting crisis level.

He said a legal challenge is likely.

Blame Trump, say the scientists who handle the metaphorical clock.

Another symbol of the administrations commitment to rolling back abortion access.

Trumps flurry of orders were penned by the Bannon wing of the White House, with little consultation from cabinet agencies or Congress. And it shows.

It makes the Islamic State happy to use Trump to manipulate the people who want to fight for Islam, says a captured ISIS fighter.

The chief nut at Infowars has a relationship with President Trump.

Theres plenty of anger right now. How can you have more? asks president who cannot fathom blowback.

Certain commuters will still see a fare increase come March.

The president reportedly cited a story about people who did not look as if they should be allowed to vote as evidence of illegal voting.

Excerpt from:
In Iraq, America's Allies and Its Enemies - Are Nervously Waiting for Donald Trump's First Move - New York Magazine

May vows no more wars like Iraq – The Australian Financial Review

by Peter Dominiczak

Britainand America will never again invade foreign countries "in an attempt to make the world in their own image", Theresa May said Thursday nightin the biggest shift in UK foreign policy for more than 20 years.

Addressing Republican politicians in Philadelphia, the Prime Minister pledged not to repeat the "failed policies of the past" in a clear reference to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan by Tony Blair and George W Bush.

Her comments are a repudiation of the doctrine of "liberal intervention" set out by Mr Blair in Chicago in 1999.

Mrs May, who received a standing ovation, made the speech as she prepared to meet Donald Trump in the White House today - the first foreign leader to do so - and begin talks on a trade deal to be announced after Britain leaves the European Union.

She made clear that Britain and America will forge a new special relationship to ensure the rise of Asian economies such as China and India does not lead to an "eclipse of the West".

And she promised to face up to the aggression of Russia and the "malign" influence of Iran in the Middle East.

Travelling to America, Mrs May insisted she would bond with Mr Trump in spite of their personality differences, saying "opposites attract". However, there were signs of policy differences between the two leaders.

Mrs May said that she "condemned" torture and suggested that Britain could limit its intelligence sharing with the US because of Mr Trump's support for waterboarding.

In her speech last night Mrs May said that Brexit and Mr Trump's election were an opportunity to "renew" the special relationship, which she described as "one of the greatest forces for good the world has ever known".

She hailed Mr Trump's election as "dawn breaking on a new era of American renewal".

She said: "I speak to you not just as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, but as a fellow Conservative who believes in the same principles that underpin the agenda of your party. The value of liberty. The dignity of work. The principles of nationhood, family, economic prudence, patriotism - and putting power in the hands of the people.

"Principles instilled in me from a young age. Principles that my parents taught me in the vicarage in southern England in which I was raised.

"I know that it is these principles that you have put at the heart of your plan for government."

In her first significant foreign policy intervention since becoming Prime Minister, Mrs May said: "It is in our interests - those of Britain and America together - to stand strong together to defend our values, our interests and the very ideas in which we believe.

"This cannot mean a return to the failed policies of the past. The days of Britain and America intervening in sovereign countries in an attempt to remake the world in our own image are over. But nor can we afford to stand idly by when the threat is real and when it is in our own interests to intervene. We must be strong, smart and hard-headed. And we must demonstrate the resolve necessary to stand up for our interests."

Her comments suggest that Britain intends to continue attacks on jihadists using drone strikes but that "boots on the ground" invasions are now a thing of the past.

They echo those of Mr Trump, who said during his inauguration ceremony last week that "we do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example".

Mrs May made clear that a stronger alliance could ensure the two countries are able to compete with Asian economies. She said that the rise of these economies at the same time as the financial crisis and a series of terror attacks "have led many to fear that, in this century, we will experience the eclipse of the West".

"But there is nothing inevitable about that. Other countries may grow stronger. Big, populous countries may grow richer. And as they do so, they may start to embrace more fully our values of democracy and liberty," she said.

Despite the positive relationship between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin, Mrs May used her speech to criticise Russia. She also sounded a warning over the negative influence of Iran in the Middle East.

She said: "There is nothing inevitable about conflict between Russia and the West. And nothing unavoidable about retreating to the days of the Cold War. But we should engage with Russia from a position of strength...We should not jeopardise the freedoms President Reagan and Mrs Thatcher brought to Eastern Europe by accepting President Putin's claim that it is now in his sphere of influence."

7

Here is the original post:
May vows no more wars like Iraq - The Australian Financial Review