Archive for the ‘Iraq’ Category

Iraq – UNHCR Factsheet – January 2017 – ReliefWeb

HIGHLIGHTS

230,836 Syrian refugees registered as of 31 December 2016

371,638 IDPs reached with protection monitoring in 2016

158,400 Persons of concerns (108,540 IDPs/49,860 refugees) received Cash assistance in 2016

360,000 IDPs received Shelter and CRI assistance in 2016

Population of concern A total of 5.7 million people of concern

Funding in 2016 USD 546.9 million requested:

WORKING WITH PARTNERS

Between 1.2 and 1.5 million may be affected by the Governments offensive to retake Mosul, which commenced on 17 October and has currently displaced over 144,000 persons from the district (as of 12 January). UNHCR is directly engaged in the inter-agency emergency response plans for Mosul and surrounding areas.

As part of the cluster coordination mechanism for IDP response and in support of the Government, UNHCR leads three Clusters - Protection; Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM); and Shelter/non-food items (NFI).

The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KR-I) hosts 96% of the Syrian refugees in Iraq. Through an inclusive approach with NGOs and other UN agencies via the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan (3RP), UNHCR leads the refugee response in support of the authorities. UNHCR and partners are appealing under the 2017/2018 3RP for USD 228 million (USD 162m for the refugee portion of the plan and USD 65m for the resilience portion). UNHCR requirements: USD 113m.

UNHCR collaborates with authorities for non-Syrian refugees in Iraq; and on Statelessness prevention and response.

Read the original post:
Iraq - UNHCR Factsheet - January 2017 - ReliefWeb

President Trump Just Told The CIA The U.S. Should Have Stolen Iraq’s Oil – Huffington Post

WASHINGTON President Donald Trump told the CIA on Saturday that the so-called Islamic State probably would never have existed if the United States had seized Iraqs oilfields, a claim that flies in the face of the analysis of most foreign policy experts and international law.

In unprepared remarks introducing his pick to lead the intelligence agency, Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), Trump told CIA officials that when the United States went into Iraq, we should have kept the oil.

Now I said it for economic reasons, Trump said. But if you think about it, Mike, if we kept the oil, you probably wouldnt have ISIS because thats where they made their money in the first place, so we should have kept the oil. But, OK, maybe well have another chance.

Its a claim that Trump repeatedly used on the campaign trail. But the presidents willingness to tell the CIA and, indeed, the international community that he thinks the United States should have looted a countrys resources is a new mark in foreign diplomacy and yet another signal that there will be no shift to more responsible rhetoric now that Trump represents the country as its leader.

The strategy of taking Iraqs oil is plainly in violation of multiple international laws and United Nations agreements.

Politifact looked into this claim from Trump in September and found a number of reasons why taking Iraqs oil, as Trump advocates, would be illegal.

What Trump seems to be advocating here would be a fundamental violation of international law embodied in numerous international agreements and in recognized principles of customary international law, said Anthony Clark Arend, a Georgetown University professor of government and foreign service.

Specifically, Arend cited the Annex to the Hague Convention of 1907 on theLaws and Customs of War, which says that private property ... must be respected (and) cannot be confiscated. It also says that pillage is formally forbidden.

In addition, Arend said, the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to theProtection of Civilian Persons in Times of War provides that any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to other public authorities, or to social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.

Richard D. Rosen, the director of Texas Tech Universitys Center for Military Law & Policy, added that Trumps idea appears to constitute aggression of the type condemned by the United Nations by resolution in 1974. The resolution states that any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof qualifies as an act of aggression.

Arend said the only way he could envision an idea like Trumps being acceptable under international law would stem from sanctions imposed by the U.N. Security Council. But that would be moot in this case since the 2003 Iraq War was not undertaken with the approval of the Security Council.

Foreign policy experts also seem to think taking Iraqs oil would neither be feasible, nor desirable.

Experts cited the long-term damage to the United States reputation as an imperial force seizing the natural resources of countries, as well as the practical challenges in actually taking a countrys oil. Devoting such a large number of troops to pillaging oilfields and protecting oil pipelines and transportation routes would require a more permanent presence in Iraq and far more troops than the United States has available.

Its also difficult to see how looting oil would better U.S. standing in Iraq and not lead to more extremism.

But hey, in Trumps words, maybe well have another chance.

How will Trumps first 100 days impact you? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to find out.

See the article here:
President Trump Just Told The CIA The U.S. Should Have Stolen Iraq's Oil - Huffington Post

In Mosul battle, Iraq forces face fewer IS-planted bombs – Yahoo News

Mosul (Iraq) (AFP) - Iraqi forces used to facing deserted, explosives-rigged streets and booby-trapped buildings have not encountered as many bombs planted by jihadists in Mosul as they did in earlier battles against them.

The Islamic State group has no qualms about killing civilians, but the presence of a large number of residents in Iraq's second city discouraged the jihadists from extensively sowing it with explosives, officers say.

While previous urban battlefields in Iraq's war against IS were largely depopulated by the time the country's forces moved in, Mosul still sheltered a million-plus people when the offensive to retake it was launched three months ago.

If explosives had been widely planted by the jihadists ahead of the battle, they would have been at risk of being triggered before Iraqi forces arrived.

So while the systematic mining of roads and rigging of buildings with bombs has arguably been IS's signature defence system against Iraqi forces, in Mosul, the jihadists had to change tack.

Iraqi forces have seen less booby-trapping in Mosul than in Anbar and Salaheddin provinces, where earlier key battles against IS took place, said Staff Lieutenant General Abdulghani al-Assadi, a top commander in the elite Counter-Terrorism Service.

"The reason is the families remained in their neighbourhoods, in their houses," Assadi said.

Some residents of the city have ventured out of their homes just moments after the fighting died down, and in recaptured areas of eastern Mosul, stores are reopening, goods are displayed in front of shops, civilian cars and pedestrians move along some streets and children play outside.

- 'No comparison' -

Staff Lieutenant General Sami al-Aridhi, another senior CTS commander, said there was "no comparison" between the number of bombs planted in Mosul and those in Anbar province, where Iraqi forces retook the cities of Ramadi and Fallujah from IS.

There are fewer because "here in Mosul, the residents didn't leave," Aridhi said.

"Now, when we advance into any neighbourhood, we don't think that the street is booby-trapped; our vehicles move normally."

IS needed civilians in Mosul to maintain at least the veneer of a functioning "state," and extensively planting bombs that could be triggered by residents would have both reduced their defensive utility and risked stoking popular anger against the jihadists.

This does not mean that IS has completely forgone the use of bombs in Mosul.

It is a "change of strategy" for IS, said Captain Qaisar Fawzi, an officer in an Iraqi army engineering battalion.

"They did not rely on roadside bombs, they relied on explosives-rigged vehicles," he added.

Vehicles rigged with bombs "are indeed the enemy's weapon of choice in the battle of Mosul," said Colonel John Dorrian, spokesman for the US-led anti-IS coalition.

But, according to Assadi, in "important areas, the residents were displaced... and (IS) started to booby-trap them."

Lise Grande, the UN's humanitarian coordinator for Iraq, said that bombs planted by IS have still posed a threat to civilians.

"People who are trying to flee Mosul... have stepped on booby-traps and IEDs (improvised explosive devices)," killing some and wounding others, Grande said.

- Civilians obstacle to both sides -

And "based on experiences from other occupied areas, we're worried that IEDs have been planted by (IS) in schools, hospitals and other public buildings," she said.

The large numbers of civilians in Mosul have also hampered Iraqi offensive operations.

Aridhi said that while security forces could previously strike IS from a distance, "here, we are not able to use any fire, because citizens are present."

"We are delayed because people are present," he said.

Assadi agreed, saying that there is "little booby-trapping, few bombs, but (many) citizens whom we must protect."

Iraqi forces do however still use heavy weapons in Mosul: helicopters and warplanes have frequently carried out strikes inside the city, and artillery as well as large unguided rockets are fired inside it.

The combination of civilians staying in the city and the lower number of bombs planted inside it means life has returned to some recaptured areas in Mosul far quicker than in other cities retaken from IS.

Parts of Ramadi and Fallujah are still uninhabitable, but while some houses and buildings in Mosul have been wrecked and streets are cratered by bombs and strewn with rubble, other places have escaped largely unharmed.

"The booby-trapping began after the start of the Mosul operation," said resident Raed Mohammed, speaking to AFP at a roundabout in the city's east where street vendors were out selling goods, but which was still overlooked by an IS billboard and marred by damaged buildings.

People were going about their daily lives before that and, had the jihadists extensively planted bombs, "it's likely that they themselves would have been exposed to explosions."

Go here to see the original:
In Mosul battle, Iraq forces face fewer IS-planted bombs - Yahoo News

Iraqi Kurdish fashionistas make a splash – BBC News


Mirror.co.uk
Iraqi Kurdish fashionistas make a splash
BBC News
Conflict and militancy may be first things that occur to many about Iraq, but a group of young fashion-conscious Kurds are hoping to help project a brighter, more optimistic image - and perhaps effect social change along the way. The group calls itself ...
Kurdish pop star fled Iraq as a child refugee and was threatened to be 'hung with a rope of fire'Mirror.co.uk
A baby named Trump and admiration for a new US president in northern IraqWashington Post

all 12 news articles »

See the article here:
Iraqi Kurdish fashionistas make a splash - BBC News

Iranian gas to flow into Iraq years after initial agreement – Rudaw

ERBIL, Kurdistan Region Iran will begin exporting natural gas to Iraq this week, Iran's oil minister said,years after the initial announcement of construction of an Iran-Iraq natural gas pipeline and postponements because of awaited payments from Baghdad, The additional fuel should supplement Iraq's under powered electricity grid.

Bijan Zangeneh, the Iranian oil minister, was reported by the Iranian news agency Tasnim as saying that the pumping of natural gas through the pipeline is slated to begin on Tuesday.

The pipeline connects the largest natural gas field in the world, the South Pars/North Dome Gas Condensate field, which is shared by Iran and Qatar, to the Iraqi city of Basra. The Basra Province has some of the country's largest natural gas power plants and a processing plant.

Rudaw reported in May 2016 that the pipeline will supply 50 million cubic-meters of gas per day, capable of generating 3,500 megawatts of power per day.

Though Iraq is a major OPEC oil producer, the country has been incapable of meeting its residents' electricity consumption. Iraq's peak electricity demand was 21,000 megawatts in the summer and the grid is only able to supply about 13,000 megawatts, Reuters reported last April.

Iran and Iraq signed a 2013 agreement regarding Iran's export of natural gas, but the pipeline wasn't completed until June 2016 because of security issues , then Tehran was awaiting payments from Baghdad.

Iran is ready to start the export of gas to Iraq and Iraq is also ready to receive the gas. However, the related letter of credit for the project is yet to be opened, Iran's oil ministry said earlier in January, cited by Irans Press TV.

He also announced through the ministry that the country's gas production had increased by 50-percent over the past three years because of improvements at South Pars.

Go here to read the rest:
Iranian gas to flow into Iraq years after initial agreement - Rudaw