Archive for the ‘Iraq’ Category

In Iraq, America’s Allies and Its Enemies – Are Nervously Waiting for Donald Trump’s First Move – New York Magazine

Yasser, a 19-year-old member of ISIS who was captured by the peshmerga, sits in the wardens office at a prison in Kirkuk. Photo: Sulome Anderson

A blindfolded, handcuffed youth in a brown hoodie shuffles into the wardens office at a prison in Kirkuk, Iraq, and sits in a tattered chair. The prisoner, Yasser, is slim and dark-skinned, with wispy facial hair. Hes only 19 years old, but Yasser is a member of the Islamic State.

Until recently, he worked as a weapons smuggler, driver, and personal assistant to Khalil Ahmad Ali al-Wais, a.k.a. Abu Wadhah, the ISIS emir in charge of territory the group holds near Kirkuk. When a U.S. coalition airstrike killed Abu Wadhah earlier last month, Yasser was left without a protector, so he tried to flee ISIS. The peshmerga, the Kurdish fighting force in northern Iraq, received intelligence on his movements and arrested him upon his arrival in Kirkuk.

The Islamic State says America is our enemy and a country of unbelievers, Yasser says, in a pubescent-sounding voice, when asked about ISISs position on Donald Trump becoming president. Since they first came, they said that their philosophy is to trigger a big conflict between Muslims and America. An American president who goes on television and says he hates Muslims is a good thing for ISIS. They are using this to tell people, Look, the Americans hate Muslims, you must go fight and kill them.

The war against ISIS in Iraq received a significant amount of debate during the American presidential race, though Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton spoke about the conflict in notably different terms. Although Clinton expressed her intention to step up an American military presence in the region, she stopped short of advocating for a ground invasion. Her approach, if a bit more hawkish, seemed to largely line up with Barack Obamas slow-burn strategy to degrade and ultimately destroy the brutal Sunni militant group. Today, with Obamas strategy still in place for the moment even though he is out of office, U.S.-supported forces continue to fight to free Mosul, the last major Iraqi city under ISIS control. It has been a slow, steady, and quiet plan; one that has succeeded in shrinking ISISs footprint without alienating any of the key players in Iraq including the Iraqi army, the Shia militias that fight alongside government troops, and the peshmerga in the north or turning them against each other.

As for Trump, its difficult to divine a coherent Iraq strategy based on statements he made during his campaign and first few days in office, but all indications are that it will involve bringing a lot more drama to a country thats always on the precipice of mass sectarian violence. He has advocated for the deployment of up to 30,000 troops in Iraq and discussed at length his objectively absurd plan to take Iraqs oil as reimbursement for American military efforts a thought he reiterated as president during his freewheeling speech at CIA headquarters last weekend and again in his interview Wednesday with ABCs David Muir. Trump told Muir that critics who questioned the legality of the move were fools, and said: If we took the oil, you wouldnt have ISIS. Trump has also roundly criticized Obamas strategy in the ongoing battle for Mosul, saying that the U.S. should not have abandoned the element of surprise by publicly announcing the offensive months ahead of time (though military strategists tend to see it as irrelevant to the progress of the battle). In his first press briefing on Monday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer reiterated that Trump will not reveal his military plans for Iraq before undertaking them.

So as we enter the Trump administration, any expectations that his bellicose campaign rhetoric about Iraq and ISIS were just bluster seem to be unfounded. In his inaugural speech, Trump spoke of eradicating radical Islamic terrorism from the face of the earth, and creating a plan of attack against ISIS is reportedly among his highest priorities in the coming weeks. The early indications suggest the plan will be aggressive on James Mattiss first day as secretary of Defense, the U.S. bombed ISIS no fewer than 31 times.

The current political and military situation in Iraq is dizzyingly complex and unfamiliar to most Americans, as is the environment that Trump would be sending those 30,000 hypothetical U.S. soldiers into as part of a mission to eradicate ISIS and seize the oil wells under their control (zero, for the record). In an effort to get a better grasp of how the new administrations actions might affect Iraq and the various players in the ongoing, low-grade civil war there, I traveled to northern Iraq last month to speak with fighters on all sides. Some were enthusiastic about Trumps aggressive stance, hoping it would lead to further American involvement in the country. Others were wary of another U.S. invasion and the chaos it might trigger. Based on what Yasser told me, ISIS straddles those two positions: enthusiastic about the new American president precisely because they expect Trump to amplify the violence and bloodshed in Iraq and beyond.

At a military base in the town of Makhmur, 30 miles southwest of the Kurdish capital of Erbil, members of a mixed-sect group of militias under the auspices of the Iraqi government are practicing their drills under the hard-eyed gazes of several U.S. special-forces soldiers. The militia members march ostentatiously as thunderous patriotic music blares from speakers across the grounds. They are chaotically out of step, arms flailing as they march which would be funny if these young men werent headed into battle soon.

The Nineveh troops are part of a broad group of mostly Shia militias known as the Popular Mobilization Units, or PMUs, which have been causing ulcers in Washington because of their close ties to Iran as well as reports that theyve been engaging in sectarian violence against Sunnis fleeing liberated ISIS territory. All the PMUs were recently absorbed into the Iraqi military. While some groups, like the Nineveh militias, began training with American forces, the U.S. has refused to provide strictly Shia PMUs with air support, since any coordination with Iran-backed groups would trigger enormous political controversy.

According to their leaders and Iraqi army officials overseeing the ceremony, the groups marching today are mixed Sunni, Shia, Christian, and even some Yazidis, the northern ethnic group that was devastated when ISIS spilled into Iraq in 2014. These fighters dont exude the kind of iron discipline displayed by most Iranian-trained military forces, and the American officers appear increasingly horrified at the Nineveh groups fumbling during the drills.

But their reaction is not shared by Karim Shwaily, the commander of the Nineveh Hashd al-Shaabi militias. In his office the day after the ceremony, Shwaily is enthusiastic about the coordination with U.S. special forces. I think the operation is going positively, he says. God willing, we will soon take the eastern part of Mosul and all of the city will be under the control of Iraq.

Asked how he anticipates U.S. strategy in Iraq will change now that Trump is president, Shwaily seems extremely reluctant to offer his thoughts.

We are just fighters, he says sharply. We dont know anything about American politics or the strategies of U.S. presidents. Our mission is clear: to fight for Nineveh and for Iraq. But America will not invade Iraq again. There have been diplomatic agreements made and they have to abide by them on the other hand, it would be impossible to abandon Iraq at such a crucial point in the fight against Daesh as ISIS is known in the region. But I think Trumps talk of invading is just rhetoric.

Like the Nineveh Hashd al-Shaabi, its not quite clear where the Iraqi army officially stands on Trump, but theyre reportedly quite displeased after his last reference to taking their oil as reimbursement for American military efforts. Though the military may have initially welcomed an American invasion to rid Iraq of ISIS, they seem to be catching on to the fact that this invasion would not be like the others, because it would be led by Donald Trump. A strong American effort to fight ISIS is one thing; a lengthy occupation for the purposes of exploiting Iraqs natural resources is another. But for the moment, the Iraqi army seems to be caught in limbo, waiting to see how this president will treat their vulnerable, war-ravaged country.

Shwailys (perhaps misplaced) optimism and caution about saying anything that might provoke the new administration is shared by an Iraqi army general at the ceremony. Coalition forces have been here for seven days, he says. We have two active operations with the Americans: liberating Mosul and now we are preparing for the second operation, which is to train these fighters. There are other bases like this, where U.S. Special Forces are training them and another thousand trainees coming up. The Americans are very helpful in coordinating with us, and we dont see that changing now that the election is over.

But an invasion is not their only concern. Trump has been crystal clear that hes not interested in spending American treasure rebuilding or remaking foreign countries. Setting aside the question of immediate military actions, theres also the issue of ongoing support for the fragile regime now in power in Iraq. Another scenario is this: says retired Lieutenant General Mark Hertling, an Iraq war veteran and military analyst. Mr. Trump has indicated that hes willing to be more isolationist If Iraq does succeed soon in Mosul, and it is now time for them to shift toward their own nation-building and we dont provide strategic support, somebody else will We have to [help] rebuild their country under a good central government in Baghdad. If we leave that as a vacuum, it will just fall apart all over again like its done so many times already.

Awards from the United States government and military decorate nearly every inch of wall space in the office of Sarhad Qader Mohammad, brigadier general in the Kirkuk police force, a law-enforcement wing of the Kurdistan Regional Government. The general is hearty and mustachioed, brimming with praise for America. While Kurdistan is not quite an independent country, it has been functioning as one since the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. There is no small amount of hope in the region that Trump, with his incautious, no-holds-barred stance on Iraq, will allow Kurdistan to fully separate into a sovereign nation a centuries-old dream of the Kurdish people, but one that would create massive geopolitical problems in the region and that is staunchly opposed by U.S. ally Turkey.

The Americans know how strategically important and sensitive Kirkuk is, so we trust them to help us keep it safe in the future, Mohammad says. Many American soldiers were killed fighting for Kirkuk, and we are thankful for their sacrifice. The U.S. gives us much aid, including training and infrastructure; if I were to spend all day talking about what theyve done for us, I wouldnt be able to finish.

Asked if he anticipates that U.S. policy will change under Trump, he smiles confidently.

I think Trump will have to live up to what he told his people, Mohammad says. Obamas strategy was to stay distant from the fight, but America was the first one hurt in the war with terrorists during 9/11. We will see what Trumps strategy is, but America is responsible for the safety of the world, and an invasion would help the Kurds, because the peshmerga was the first army fighting Daesh with the Americans.

Trump has been quite vocal in his approval of the Kurds. I am a big fan of the Kurdish forces, he pronounced last summer, indicating that he wanted to get Kurdish leaders in a room with Turkish leaders for some negotiations quite a tall order for anyone who understands the depth of that enmity. In any case, it seems the peshmerga are betting that a hawkish Trump administration will be generous enough to grant them independence after the dust settles in the wake of a potential large-scale American ground offensive.

The elderly warden at Yassers prison shares this perspective. I think the entire American strategy is going to change, he croaks gleefully. In my opinion, Trump is better than Hillary Clinton because he likes the Kurds. He will be better for the peshmerga, especially if he invades. Both he and Hillary said they will support us, but Trump will be stronger.

But while it might create a great photo op or tweet, the long-term implications of any such generous gesture from Trump could be very serious. The question of Kurdish independence will be another source of friction once the war calms down and Kurds and Iraqi Arabs no longer have a common enemy, says Dr. Jeffrey McCausland, a veteran and professor at the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Of course, nothing Trump has said so far indicates any plan, much less awareness, of how hell prevent the region from tumbling deeper into chaos after the extremists are eradicated and the oil is taken.

In October 2016, ISIS militants set fire to the Qayyarah oil fields, about 35 miles south of Mosul. The inferno has been blazing ever since, with little hope of being extinguished anytime soon, and the village itself exists under a noxious, billowing cloud of dark smoke. At an intersection on the outskirts of town, a charity van pulls up to a mob of filthy children in rags and workers get out and begin distributing food. The children immediately begin to fight over the fruit and bread. A little girl no older than 6 or 7, wearing a shredded pink Minnie Mouse shirt, punches an older boy in the stomach and triumphantly makes off with an orange.

A short distance away, at an outpost of the Badr Organization, one of the Iran-linked Shia Hashd al-Shaabi militias that have proven so politically sensitive for the U.S., two fighters sip from little glasses of syrupy black tea. The Badr Organization was born during the 1980s and led uprisings against Saddam Hussein during the 2003 Iraq war. In the aftermath of Saddams ouster, the militia has grown in size and influence, with the help of Iran. The Badr Organization now claims to command between 10,000 and 50,000 men. The group was implicated in reports of sectarian war crimes following the liberation of Fallujah in 2016, though they deny responsibility.

Its clear that the Shia militiamen are significantly more apprehensive about a Trump presidency than their peers in the Nineveh Hashd al-Shaabi, Iraqi army, and peshmerga. Given Trumps aggressive rhetoric on Iran, their wariness is understandable.

Obama is weak and wasnt hard on the terrorists, says one of them, a thickly bearded man wearing a green beanie. We heard that this president will be stronger, so we know everything will change. But we also know he doesnt distinguish between Daesh and us. He thinks were terrorists because were supposed to be on the side of Iran.

The oil wells here are decrepit and damaged, his tall, thin friend adds. I have heard that this President Trump wants to come, rebuild the oil refineries and take our oil. He also says he will fight Iran and Saudi Arabia. In my opinion, one man cannot do something like that, because he will be responsible for destroying the world.

The fighter in the green beanie lights a thin Iraqi cigarette and finishes his tea. The peshmerga and the Iraqi army like Trump because they know they will benefit from an invasion, he says, flicking ash into his empty glass. But we know if theres an invasion, were not going to benefit. We will end up in a conflict with America.

Its obvious that the Trump administration will be facing some complicated obstacles in Iraq over the upcoming months and years. McCausland of the U.S. Army War College says that the real challenge begins after ISIS is defeated: ensuring that history doesnt repeat itself, that the country doesnt spiral into another sectarian conflict, perhaps leading to the establishment of ISIS 2.0. Defining success as beating ISIS, which seems to be a focal point of the Trump administration and a lot of the folks hes picked for national security offices, isnt good enough, he says. Can he in any way improve what has been the real problem in Iraq, which is continued friction between the Shiites and the Sunnis, in the aftermath of the ISIS occupation?

According to Yasser, Trump is one bright spot in what is an otherwise bleak and besieged existence for ISIS at this moment. The 19-year-old shuffles his feet around and fidgets with his handcuffs, looking like a restless kid in math class as he tries to explain the terrorist groups enthusiasm for the new U.S. president.

A president like Trump will drive Muslims towards the Islamic State and show them that all the kuffar the unbelievers hate them, Yasir says without expression. It makes the Islamic State happy to use him to manipulate the people who want to fight for Islam.

Trump Aides Keep Leaking Embarrassing Stories About How He Cant Handle Embarrassment

D.C. Dress Shop Is Reportedly Having a Sale Because So Many Inauguration Dresses Are Left Over

He ordered them to produce more photos of the Mall, and complained about the agencys retweets.

In discussing the U.S.-U.K. special relationship she stressed the importance of NATO and of dealing with Russia from a position of strength.

Donald Trumps chief White House strategist declares war on the press.

Now at least Trump has less money to play with.

Sean Spicer explained the House GOPs border-adjustment tax poorly. The media assumed the worst. Fake news ensued.

Newt couldnt make it into the Trump administration but his wife may be able to.

Analysts estimate it could cost as much as $20 billion.

Republicans meeting in Philadelphia were confused about their agenda and in dire need of presidential guidance. Instead they got a campaign speech.

But no mass deportation.

Rex Tillerson will begin his tenure at the State Department with no one experienced at managing its bureaucracy to guide or constrain him.

The White House visit is off, and tensions are hitting crisis level.

He said a legal challenge is likely.

Blame Trump, say the scientists who handle the metaphorical clock.

Another symbol of the administrations commitment to rolling back abortion access.

Trumps flurry of orders were penned by the Bannon wing of the White House, with little consultation from cabinet agencies or Congress. And it shows.

It makes the Islamic State happy to use Trump to manipulate the people who want to fight for Islam, says a captured ISIS fighter.

The chief nut at Infowars has a relationship with President Trump.

Theres plenty of anger right now. How can you have more? asks president who cannot fathom blowback.

Certain commuters will still see a fare increase come March.

The president reportedly cited a story about people who did not look as if they should be allowed to vote as evidence of illegal voting.

Excerpt from:
In Iraq, America's Allies and Its Enemies - Are Nervously Waiting for Donald Trump's First Move - New York Magazine

May vows no more wars like Iraq – The Australian Financial Review

by Peter Dominiczak

Britainand America will never again invade foreign countries "in an attempt to make the world in their own image", Theresa May said Thursday nightin the biggest shift in UK foreign policy for more than 20 years.

Addressing Republican politicians in Philadelphia, the Prime Minister pledged not to repeat the "failed policies of the past" in a clear reference to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan by Tony Blair and George W Bush.

Her comments are a repudiation of the doctrine of "liberal intervention" set out by Mr Blair in Chicago in 1999.

Mrs May, who received a standing ovation, made the speech as she prepared to meet Donald Trump in the White House today - the first foreign leader to do so - and begin talks on a trade deal to be announced after Britain leaves the European Union.

She made clear that Britain and America will forge a new special relationship to ensure the rise of Asian economies such as China and India does not lead to an "eclipse of the West".

And she promised to face up to the aggression of Russia and the "malign" influence of Iran in the Middle East.

Travelling to America, Mrs May insisted she would bond with Mr Trump in spite of their personality differences, saying "opposites attract". However, there were signs of policy differences between the two leaders.

Mrs May said that she "condemned" torture and suggested that Britain could limit its intelligence sharing with the US because of Mr Trump's support for waterboarding.

In her speech last night Mrs May said that Brexit and Mr Trump's election were an opportunity to "renew" the special relationship, which she described as "one of the greatest forces for good the world has ever known".

She hailed Mr Trump's election as "dawn breaking on a new era of American renewal".

She said: "I speak to you not just as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, but as a fellow Conservative who believes in the same principles that underpin the agenda of your party. The value of liberty. The dignity of work. The principles of nationhood, family, economic prudence, patriotism - and putting power in the hands of the people.

"Principles instilled in me from a young age. Principles that my parents taught me in the vicarage in southern England in which I was raised.

"I know that it is these principles that you have put at the heart of your plan for government."

In her first significant foreign policy intervention since becoming Prime Minister, Mrs May said: "It is in our interests - those of Britain and America together - to stand strong together to defend our values, our interests and the very ideas in which we believe.

"This cannot mean a return to the failed policies of the past. The days of Britain and America intervening in sovereign countries in an attempt to remake the world in our own image are over. But nor can we afford to stand idly by when the threat is real and when it is in our own interests to intervene. We must be strong, smart and hard-headed. And we must demonstrate the resolve necessary to stand up for our interests."

Her comments suggest that Britain intends to continue attacks on jihadists using drone strikes but that "boots on the ground" invasions are now a thing of the past.

They echo those of Mr Trump, who said during his inauguration ceremony last week that "we do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example".

Mrs May made clear that a stronger alliance could ensure the two countries are able to compete with Asian economies. She said that the rise of these economies at the same time as the financial crisis and a series of terror attacks "have led many to fear that, in this century, we will experience the eclipse of the West".

"But there is nothing inevitable about that. Other countries may grow stronger. Big, populous countries may grow richer. And as they do so, they may start to embrace more fully our values of democracy and liberty," she said.

Despite the positive relationship between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin, Mrs May used her speech to criticise Russia. She also sounded a warning over the negative influence of Iran in the Middle East.

She said: "There is nothing inevitable about conflict between Russia and the West. And nothing unavoidable about retreating to the days of the Cold War. But we should engage with Russia from a position of strength...We should not jeopardise the freedoms President Reagan and Mrs Thatcher brought to Eastern Europe by accepting President Putin's claim that it is now in his sphere of influence."

7

Here is the original post:
May vows no more wars like Iraq - The Australian Financial Review

Trump says he’ll order ‘safe zones’ for Syria, regrets not ‘taking’ oil out of Iraq – RT

US President Donald Trump said hell establish safe zones within Syria for people fleeing terrorism, risking becoming even more involved in the crisis. He also believes the US should have taken the oil from Iraq as it pulled its troops out in 2011.

Ill absolutely do safe zones in Syria for the people, he said in a lengthy interviewwith ABC, his first since taking office. The president did not specify details, but explained his intention with a nod towards Europe, which he said made a mistake by letting in asylum seekers from the Middle East.

Read more

I think that Europe has made a tremendous mistake by allowing these millions of people to go into Germany and various other countries. And all you have to do is take a look. It's it's a disaster what's happening over there. I don't want that to happen here, he said. He noted that his predecessor Barack Obama also allowed thousands of refugees into the United States, which made possible incidents like the tragedy in San Bernardino in 2015, in which 14 people were killed and 22 others were injured in a terrorist attack carried out by a radicalized couple of Pakistani origin. Trump vowed not to repeat those mistakes.

Trump accused the Obama administration of having been unable to properly check immigrants entering the US from Syria and other crisis-stricken states to make sure they had no links to terrorism.

President Obama and [former Secretaries of State] Hillary Clinton and [John] Kerry have allowed tens of thousands of people into our country. The FBI is now investigating more people than ever before having to do with terror [] and it's from the group of people that came in.

I'm gonna be the president of a safe country. We have enough problems, Trump said.

Moscow was quick to react to Trumps plans, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov suggesting the US should calculate all the possible consequences.

Its important to make sure that this does not further aggravate the situation with refugees, Peskov told a conference call with reporters.

Read more

Yet, according to a document reportedly seen by Reuters, Trump is expected to order the Pentagon and the State Department to compile a plan for setting up the safe zones which he proposed.

The Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, is directed within 90 days of the date of this order to produce a plan to provide safe areas in Syria and in the surrounding region in which Syrian nationals displaced from their homeland can await firm settlement, such as repatriation or potential third-country resettlement, the draft order said, as cited by Reuters.

The move will mean the current US military involvement in Syrias civil war will be expanded, which may escalate the situation taking into account that American troops and the US-led coalition were not invited to take part in the conflict by the Syrian government in the first place.

The US-governed creation of safe zones would potentially mean an increase in the presence of US or allied air power to cover the zones from air, as well as boots on the ground to protect civilians in these areas. However, according to Reuters, the draft order provides no details on what the safe zones would require in terms of defense or where they might be located.

The draft order provided a notion of setting up the safe zones in neighboring countries, but Syrias neighbors, including Jordan and Turkey, already have migrant camps of their own hosting millions of Syrian refugees.

Trumps plan to establish safe zones in Syria is part of his general directive on immigration, which will include a temporary 30-day ban on most refugees and a suspension of US visas for citizens of Syria, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, the Middle Eastern and African countries that appear to pose a terrorism threat. Trumps administration is to use the temporary halt to work out a system which will ensure US visas are not issued to people that pose a national security threat, according to the draft.

Trump also said he will keep his campaign promise and build a wall on the border with Mexico, from where illegal immigrants, including from across the ocean, come into the US.

Addressing Americas involvement in another Middle Eastern crisis the war in Iraq, the newly-inaugurated US leader regretted not having taken the oil when the US troops left the country in 2011.

Read more

In his historic speech at the CIA in Washington, DC, last week, Trump initially stated, We should've kept the oil. But, OK, maybe well have another chance, sparking debates as to what he could have meant by the statement. In an interview with ABC, the president explained his words, stating that Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) would not have become a global threat had it not taken over Iraqs oil industry when the country was left weakened by the war.

We should've kept the oil when we got out. And, you know, it's very interesting, had we taken the oil, you wouldn't have ISIS because they fuel themselves with the oil. That's where they got the money. They got the money [] when we left, we left Iraq, which wasn't a government.

We created a vacuum and ISIS formed. But had we taken the oil something else very good would've happened. They would not have been able to fuel their rather unbelievable drive to destroy large portions of the world, Trump stated. He added, however, that Iraqs oil could profit the United States as well, with the countrys budget drained by its involvement in the wars of the Middle East.

If we took the oil you wouldn't have ISIS. And we would have had wealth. We have spent right now $6 trillion in the Middle East. And our country is falling apart.

When asked by the news anchor whether he plans to fix that mistake and claim Iraqs oil, the president said he would rather not give away his military plans, referring to the situation around Mosul, the de-facto IS capital in Iraq. The city has been under siege by Iraqi government forces, allied militias, Iraqi Kurdistan, and international forces for over three months now, with no forecasts so far on when the city will be liberated from terrorists. This, in Trumps opinion, is due to the fact the campaign had been over-advertised.

READ MORE:US gave ISIS escape route from Mosul to Syria; now civilians are paying the price

We're gonna see what happens. You know, [] when it comes to the military I don't want to discuss things.

I want to let the action take place before the talk takes place. I watched in Mosul when a number of months ago generals and politicians would get up and say, We're going into Mosul in four months. Then they'd say, We're going in in three months, two months, one month. We're going in next week.

I kept saying to myself, Gee, why do they have to keep talking about going in? Alright, so now they go in and it is tough because they're giving the enemy all this time to prepare. I don't want to do a lot of talking on the military. I want to talk after it's finished, not before it starts, Trump said.

See the original post:
Trump says he'll order 'safe zones' for Syria, regrets not 'taking' oil out of Iraq - RT

Theresa May vows no more ‘failed’ Iraq-style invasions while speaking in US amid radical foreign policy shake-up – Mirror.co.uk

Theresa May tonight vowed there will be no more failed Iraq-style foreign invasions by British forces in the biggest foreign policy shake-up in 20 years.

In her first US speech as Prime Minister, Mrs May called time on two decades of so-called 'liberal intervention' by Britain in countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Kosovo.

It is in our interests to stand strong together to defend our values, the PM said.

This cannot mean a return to the failed policies of the past. The days of Britain and America intervening in sovereign countries in an attempt to remake the world in our own image are over.

Her comments signal an end to two decades of intervention by Britain in countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Kosovo and Sierra Leone.

However the PM also warned President Trump not to stand idly by in the face of real threats to national security.

And she urged him to help defend eastern Europe from the growing threat from Vladimir Putin.

The new President has described NATO as obsolete and questioned whether he would bother to defend eastern European states if Russia attacked.

But Mrs May invoked Trump's hero, former President Ronald Reagan, as she begged him to stand up for eastern Europe.

When it comes to Russia, as so often it is wise to turn to the example of President Reagan who - during negotiations with his opposite number Mikhail Gorbachev - used to abide by the adage trust but verify. With President Putin, my advice is to 'engage but beware', she said.

We should not jeopardise the freedoms that President Reagan and Mrs Thatcher brought to

She had earlier claimed "opposites attract" when asked about her relationship with Donald Trump in a remark that risks enraging millions of women around the world who marched in protest last Saturday following the inauguration.

Mrs May will become the first world leader to meet the new President since his inauguration when the pair sit down for talks in the White House.

She is desperate to strike up a close relationship despite repeated warnings from Tory MPs not to get too close to the much-criticised President.

President Trump sounded somewhat less excited by the summit than the PM as he moaned about having to lead talks on a UK/US trade deal himself.

His choice for commerce secretary Wilbur Ross has not yet been approved by Congress.

"I'm meeting the Prime Minister tomorrow, he told a Republican Party conference in Philadelphia.

I don't have my Commerce Secretary yet, and they want to talk trade. So I'll have to handle it myself... Which is ok."

But Mrs May risks enraging millions of women around the world who marched in protest last Saturday following President Trump's inauguration.

The new President has previously boasted about sexually assaulting women and now wants to clamp down on abortion rights.

Mrs May did condemn his boasts as unacceptable earlier this month - but as she prepares for their first meeting tomorrow she was keen to stress areas of common ground.

I think we both share a desire to ensure that governments are working for everyone - and particularly that governments are working for ordinary working families and working class families, the PM said.

I think that's important. I think we share that interest and that intention in both our countries.

In a speech to leading Republican politicians in Philadelphia tonight Mrs May will go further and shower praise on Mr Trump and his plans for office.

She will credit him with helping America to rediscover its confidence and to renew the nation.

And she will vow that under their leadership Britain and America can lead together again.

Speaking ahead of the speech she said her first White House summit will be crucial in cementing that special relationship.

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

Video will play in

Whats going to be important is having the opportunity to actually sit down with President Trump and talk to him face to face, about the interests we share, about the special relationship, about the joint challenges we both face, she said.

I believe what will come out of this is a very clear determination on both sides not just to maintain the special relationship, but also to build it for the future.

There is a real role for the UK and the US working together.

See the rest here:
Theresa May vows no more 'failed' Iraq-style invasions while speaking in US amid radical foreign policy shake-up - Mirror.co.uk

Germany Extends Military Training Mission in Northern Iraq – Benson County Farmers Press

Germany Extends Military Training Mission in Northern Iraq
Benson County Farmers Press
Germany's Parliament has extended the country's training mission in northern Iraq for another year. Some 150 soldiers with the Bundeswehr have been training Kurdish "Peshmerga" militias already for two years to help in the fight against Islamic State ...

and more »

Read the original here:
Germany Extends Military Training Mission in Northern Iraq - Benson County Farmers Press