Mediaboss Marketing

By Jeremy Courtney By Jeremy Courtney March 31 at 5:30 AM

To all my friends in London who are reeling after last weeks attack outside Parliament: I see you. I mourn with you. And I want you to know its OK to be afraid.

The day after the attack, your prime minister stood up in the House of Commons and said, We are not afraid. This slogan has since appeared on tube signs and billboards throughout the city and on Facebook profiles around the world.

And I get it. We are not afraid is a statement of defiance, a rallying cry in the face of our shared trauma and grief. It gives us something to hold on to after yet another horrifying attack in a world that was already scary as hell. I think its trying to say, We wont let the terrorists win.

But we are not afraid is the wrong way to respond to terror. Its not how we build a society in which love prevails over hate.

Ive spent more than a decade living in Iraq. I see what ISIS is capable of. I witness the devastation caused by extremism and by the fight against it. Im on the front lines and I walk past burned-out buildings and the bodies of recently killed ISIS fighters. I weep with families who are left in the dirt after fleeing their homes on foot and losing everything to violence.

A few days before the London attack, my team and I were servinginside west Mosul,bringing food to 12,000 besieged people as airstrikes and mortars rained down on three sides, targeting ISIS militants just streets away from us.

I was afraid. In fact, over the past 10years of our team working in Iraq, Syria, and Libya, Im regularly afraid. Because fear in the face of terror is normal, whether youre on the streets of Mosul or the streets of London.

The problem is when weshamefear, when we drive it underground, when we normalize bravado and idealize the absence of fear as if simply saying we are not afraid makes it so. How can you not be afraid of ISIS? How can you not be afraid of terrorism if youve lived through 9/11 or the attacks in London, Paris, Nice, San Bernardino, Baghdad or a hundred other places that have been torn apart by violence?

Fear is not our problem. Our problem is alienating those who feel afraid, making it harder for us to have healthy conversations about our fears. Fear driven underground metastasizes into bigotry and hatred and distrust of the other. It gives rise to the worst forms of populism the kinds that pit us against them and consolidate blame onto a common enemy who may not look like us or pray the way we do or see the world exactly as we see it.

Terror is meant to traumatize and divide us. So the messages around which we choose to unify in the midst of our trauma are just as important as whether we unify at all. Saying we are not afraid is a shortcut to a false unity well pay a price for it in the end. Its a short-term fix that causes long-term damage, because it keeps us from going to the core of what separates us from each other. This bravado prevents us from building a more robust society that is strong enough to not only withstand the next terror attack, but to actually unmake violence itself to love terrorism out of existence.

Instead of telling people we are not afraid, our leaders should tell us the truth: You may be afraid. These are scary times. The world is scary as hell, and there may be more to come. But we will love anyway.

Because lets be honest: Even if we could all keep a stiff upper lip and steel our hearts against fear, what would that accomplish for the world? To say no fear is to live by what werenot.Thats not leadership. Thats just reaction.

Real courage is not found in the denial of fear. Its when we choose to face our fear, take one step toward it, and love anyway.

Love means listening to the fears of those who are traumatized by terror, who are fearful of the next attack instead of pretending these fears dont exist or that they somehow make us weak. It means learning to have healthy conversations about what or who we fear and askinghow can we help?

Love means listening to the fears of those who have become targets for reprisal or marginalization as a direct result of the fear most of us pretend not to have. The hibaji woman who cannot walk down the street without drawing hostile stares, the refugee with the Middle Eastern-sounding name who wonders if he is truly welcome in his new home love takes one step toward the other.

Pretending youre not afraid might get you through today or the next day. But if you actually want to change the world you live in if you want to walk through your fear, not just deny it preemptive love is the only way.

This kind of love refuses to pit us against them. It refuses to put our well-being over and against the well-being of others. It sayswe belong to each other fears and all.

Violence unmakes the world and make no mistake: that is a scary thing. But preemptive love unmakes violence. And thats the best way to defeat terror.

Jeremy Courtneyis CEO of Preemptive Love Coalition, working on the frontlines in Iraq and Syria to protect the persecuted and displaced from becoming refugees, by delivering aid inside conflict zones and providing small-business empowerment. He is author of Preemptive Love: Pursuing Peace One Heart at a Time.

Read more Inspired Life:

Hailed a hero after Kansas bar shooting, victim said he did what was naturally right to do

In the midst of the Brussels airport attacks, this worker started saving people

I Got You: San Bernardino victim shielded female co-worker during shooting, saving her life

Excerpt from:
I've worked more than a decade in Iraq. 'We are not afraid' is the wrong response to terror attacks. - Washington Post

A state of limbo is about to lift for hundreds of Iraqis in the United States. The government tried to deport them after they committed crimes, but Iraq wouldnt take them back.

Now some of them are headed home and, quite possibly, into danger.

Trump administration strikes a deal with Iraq

As part of the negotiations surrounding the most recent Trump executive order on immigration, Iraq came off the list of countries whose citizens are barred from entering the U.S.

It was widely reported thats because Iraq agreed to increase cooperation with the U.S., and share more information about its citizens.

A lesser-known aspect of that deal: Iraq agreed to start accepting deportees from the U.S. something it had refused to do for many years.

Bad timing for one Michigan attorney and his Iraqi client

Brad Maze found out about Iraqs change of heart through a court filing he made on behalf of an Iraqi national. Maze is an immigration attorney in metro Detroit, home to about 175,000 Iraqis.

Immigration agents had picked up one of his clients after a probation violation, and held him in immigration detention for more than six months. Too long, according to the law.

And so we filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Michigan to contest his detention that either immigration must release him or remove him, Maze says.

Mazes client already had whats called a final order of removal. But because his client was an Iraqi national, Maze called the U.S. governments bluff.

We assumed that the government of Iraq would not be able to issue a travel document, because they havent in the past," Maze said.

But thats not what happened. Instead, the government filed a response that revealed a major change for Iraqis with deportation orders:

Iraq was specifically removed from the list of countries affected by the Executive Order based on its agreement to facilitate repatriation of Iraqi nationals subject to removal orders, the response read.

The client remains in detention, awaiting a flight to Iraq.

Defenders of the change: Its about time

Jessica Vaughn credits President Trump with quick progress on an issue that previous administrations had simply failed to fix. Shes with the Center for Immigration Studies.

This is one of the first instances where the Trump administration had the opportunity to make progress on this issue of recalcitrant countries, and actually succeed in getting a country to change its practices on this issue, says Vaughn.

And it tells me that when the U.S. is able to identify a point of leverage with another country, we can use this to change their practices on this important issue.

Vaughn says all the Iraqisunder deportation orders had an opportunityin immigration courtto make their case for staying in the U.S.

And if they cannot do that, then they really should be returned home, or be given the opportunity to be returned to another country, Vaughn says.

But Martin Manna, president of the Chaldean Community Foundation, says thats turning a blind eye to what may happen to the deportees once they return home.

Manna estimates about 300 ethnic Chaldean Catholics in Michigan alone are at risk of deportation to a country where their faith makes them a target.

Sending them back would be a death sentence for them, he says.

Manna says its ironic that Chaldeans in Macomb County overwhelmingly supported Trump in the presidential election because they were so frustrated by the previous policies, of the way Christians were being treated under the Obama administration.

Harsh realities for some who have been in the U.S. for decades

Its not just Iraqi Chaldeans facing deportation who are fearful.

Kam, a 41-year old business owner, is Kurdish. He lives in southeast Michigan with his U.S.-born wife, Caroline, and their three children. Were not using the familys last name because they're worried that speaking out could harm his case.

Kam came to the U.S. in 1993 as a teenager, with his parents, eight sisters, and a brother. All twelve of them fled their northern Iraq home on foot.

Hes been in this country twice as long as he lived in the Middle East. But he never became a U.S. citizen.

Basically, this has been my home and my culture and my life, he says, sitting on a sofa in his living room after serving black tea and sweets.

In 2011, he was convicted on a felony marijuana delivery charge. It was a deportable offense, but Iraq refused to issue him a passport. So he got to go back to his life -- running the collision shop he owns, raising his kids, and checking in regularly with immigration.

Then he got a call from his lawyer, saying so-called Iraqi government made some kind of deal as far as lifting the travel ban on Iraq.

He wipes tears from his eyes, his wife at his side.

"Should we tell the kids they may lose their dad?"

Kams sister Sarah sits on a sofa across from him. Shes terrified he will be targeted in Iraq as an ethnic minority.

Both Sarah and another one of her sisters worked as interpreters for the U.S. government about a decade ago, and she fears that could put him in danger as well.

To me, as a citizen of this country, I felt that I had the duty to serve, she says. And now I look at the same government that we risked our lives for, my sister and I, try to send my brother back there. She trails off.

Its not clear how quickly the U.S. will move on the deportations.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement would only confirm that the first flight leaves in April.

Kam and Caroline dont know what theyll tell the kids. Caroline says she hasnt told them anything about whats going on.

Do I bring them to the appointment so that he can say goodbye, or do I keep pretending nothings happening, and then they dont get to say goodbye? Caroline asks.

They only have a few days to figure it out. Kams appointment with ICE isnext Tuesday.

More:
Trump makes a deal with Iraq, and hundreds suddenly face deportation - Michigan Radio

MOSUL, Iraq A sharp rise in the number of civilians reported killed in U.S.-led airstrikes in Iraq and Syria is spreading panic, deepening mistrust and triggering accusations that the United States and its partners may be acting without sufficient regard for lives of noncombatants.

The increase comes as local ground forces backed by air support from a U.S.-led coalition close in on the Islamic States two main urban bastions Raqqa in Syria and Mosul in Iraq.

In front-line neighborhoods in western Mosul, families described cowering in basements for weeks as bombs rained down around them and the Islamic State battled from their rooftops. Across the border in Raqqa, residents desperately trying to flee before an offensive begins are being blocked by the militants, who frequently use civilians as human shields.

Throughout his election campaign, President Trump pledged to target Islamic State militants more aggressively, criticizing the U.S. air campaign for being too gentle and asking for a reassessment of battlefield rules. The United States has denied there has been any shift and defended the conduct of its campaign.

But figures compiled by monitoring organizations and interviews with residents paint an increasingly bloody picture, with the number of casualties in March already surpassing records for a single month.

[Mosul residents say U.S.-led coalition airstrikes killed scores of people]

The worst alleged attack was in Mosul, where rescue teams are still digging out bodies after what residents describe as a hellish onslaught in the Mosul al-Jadida neighborhood during the battle to retake it two weeks ago. Iraqi officials and residents say as many as 200 died in U.S.-led strikes, with more than 100 bodies recovered from a single building. The wooden carts that residents use to carry vegetables and other wares in the once busy market area instead ferried out cadavers recovered from the rubble last week.

The U.S.-led coalition, which has acknowledged carrying out a strike against militants in the area, says it is investigating the reports. If we did it, and Id say theres at least a fair chance that we did, it was an unintentional accident of war, Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, the top U.S. commander for Iraq and Syria, said Tuesday at the Pentagon.

Amnesty International on Tuesday said the coalition was not taking sufficient precautions to prevent civilian deaths in Mosul, in a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.

It was just one of numerous incidents across Iraq and Syria in recent weeks that have raised concerns that the United States has flouted rules requiring it to protect civilians. In both countries, politicians and activists say the high numbers of deaths are spreading alarm among civilians and sowing distrust of the U.S.-backed campaign advancing toward their homes.

People used to feel safe when the American planes were in the sky, because they knew they didnt hit civilians, said Hussam Essa, a founder of Raqqa is Being Slaughtered Silently, which monitors violence in Raqqa province. They were only afraid of the Russian and regime planes. But now they are very afraid of the American airstrikes. American planes are targeting everywhere, he said.

According to the U.K.-based organization Airwars, which tracks allegations of civilian deaths in airstrikes, out of 1,257 claims of deaths in U.S.-led coalition airstrikes this month, a record 337 have been assessed as being fair, meaning that there is a reasonable level of public reporting of the alleged incident from two or more generally credible sources and that strikes have been confirmed in the vicinity on the day in question.

[Airstrike monitoring group overwhelmed by claims of civilian casualties]

The scale of the destruction is huge, and we are reeling from the number of alleged cases, not just in Mosul but in Raqqa, too, said Chris Woods, the director of Airwars. Casualty numbers from western Mosul are absolutely shocking. In Syria its a car here, a family there. It happens every day.

The group said in a statement last week that it had stopped monitoring Russian strikes in Syria, in order to focus on accusations linked to the U.S.-led coalition, saying its organization is overwhelmed. In the first two months of the year, U.S. strikes were responsible for more civilian casualties than Russian strikes for the first time since Russia intervened in Syrias civil war in 2015, according to Airwars figures. Russian strikes are now climbing again as a partial cease-fire collapses.

Woods said the intensification began during the Obama administration but escalated under Trump. In December, the U.S.-led coalition delegated approval to battlefield commanders in Mosul, speeding up the responsiveness of strikes after a tough battle for the eastern part of the city. The coalition says strikes are subject to the same scrutiny.

The death of innocent civilians in war is a terrible tragedy that weighs heavily on all of us, said Col. Joseph Scrocca, a spokesman for the U.S. military in Baghdad, adding that the United States works within the laws of armed conflict. We set the highest standards for protecting civilians, and our dedication, diligence and discipline in prosecuting our combat operations, while protecting civilians, is without precedence in the history of warfare.

The escalation of U.S. strikes around the city of Raqqa occurred in February as the United States intensified efforts to train and equip a Syrian force in preparation for an offensive against the city, expected to begin in the coming months.

[On the front lines of the fight for the Islamic States capital of Raqqa]

In March, the tempo increased further, with more sites being targeted that have no obvious military value, according to a Syrian living in Turkey who is from Raqqa and is in regular contact with his family and friends who are still there. They are hitting everything that isnt a small house, including the barges that ferry passengers across the river dividing the city now that the bridges have been disabled, he said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of concern for his family.

Among the bigger incidents was a strike last week on a school sheltering displaced people in the town of Mansoura, outside Raqqa, that killed at least 30 people, according to monitoring groups. An attack on a mosque in western Aleppo that the U.S. military said was aimed at known al-Qaeda operatives also appears to have killed dozens of people attending prayers, according to witness accounts and monitoring groups.

The U.S. military said after the Aleppo strike that it had hit a gathering of militants near a mosque but denied striking the mosque itself. The military is conducting an investigation into the incident.

Townsend said the initial indications were that the school strike was clean and did not kill civilians.

A wave of continued attacks in the past week in the small town of Tabqa has added to a record toll of 101 civilians killed by U.S. strikes from the beginning of the month to March 21, Essa said. He provided the names of 41 people alleged to have been killed in a three-day period last week in strikes that hit a bakery, a carwash, a slaughterhouse and other targets.

In Iraq and Syria, residents and activists say there has also been a discernible shift in the kinds of targets being hit with infrastructure such as hospitals and schools coming under fire. The U.S.-led coalition contends that militants are increasingly using such protected buildings as bases for attack, knowing that there are restrictions on bombing them under U.S. rules of engagement.

Tabqa is a crucial step on the path to Raqqa, and it is the current focus of the battle. Reports that the Tabqa dam have also been hit by airstrikes during the fighting have further contributed to the sense of panic after the Islamic State issued a warning on Sunday that the dam could burst.

Townsend said the United States had not been targeting the Tabqa dam and had been using non-cratering munitions in that area to protect the site.

Downstream from the dam, residents are terrified by the intensified bombing and of the risk of a dam breach, the Syrian said. His family is desperate to escape, but the Islamic State has erected checkpoints to prevent people from fleeing. People dont know what to do, he said.

In Iraq, too, civilians are trapped as Iraqi forces push into the most densely packed areas of Mosul, including the Old City, where an estimated 400,000 people are trapped in old structures on narrow streets.

The United Nations said Tuesday that at least 307 civilians were killed in western Mosul between Feb.17 and March 22, warning Iraqi security forces and the coalition to avoid falling into the Islamic States trap as the group deliberately puts civilians in danger.

With a large amount of artillery and ordnance being fired into the city, though, it is hard to ascertain which deaths the coalition is responsible for, Woods said. Iraqi commanders, who call in airstrikes from the U.S.-led coalition, say its difficult for them to know whether civilians are in houses when many are stuck inside for weeks at a time and it is not possible to see them through drone surveillance.

Lt. Gen. Abdul Ghani al-Asadi, commander of Iraqs counterterrorism units, said the troops are instead relying on tips from those fleeing as to which houses have civilians inside.

Still, Mosul Eye, a monitoring group in the city, said it had warned Iraqi forces that civilians were trapped in homes in Mosul al-Jadida days before the U.S. strike there and sent coordinates.

Amnesty International said that because the government has told residents to stay in their homes, the U.S.-led coalition should have known that strikes would be likely to result in significant numbers of civilian casualties.

For civilians, many of whom are trapped, the situation is dire.

Nour Mohammeds family of 23 people hid in a basement in western Mosul for nearly two weeks as explosions rang out around them.

Islamic State militants forced the family to keep the front door open so that they could move in and out of the building freely and fend off the advancing Iraqi forces from the roof.

We were terrified every time wed hear the sound of an airplane that theyd bomb us all, she said as she fled the city last week.

Sly reported from Beirut. Mustafa Salim in Mosul and Missy Ryan in Washington contributed to this report.

Read more:

Away from Iraqs front lines, the Islamic State is creeping back in

I thought, this is it: One mans escape from an Islamic State mass execution

Todays coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Go here to read the rest:
Panic spreads in Iraq, Syria as record numbers of civilians ...

"We're doing very well in Iraq," Trump said at a reception for all US senators and their spouses in the White House East Room, adding he'd just ended a long phone call with Defense Secretary James Mattis before appearing at the event.

Trump added that "our soldiers are fighting like never before" in Iraq, and praised what he characterized as a positive trajectory in the country.

During the Iraq War, which began in 2003, US troops engaged in extended fighting across the country, battling an insurgency and later sectarian violence to secure areas in key cities and regions.

Though troops currently in Iraq aren't officially carrying out a combat mission, they do face danger and limited engagement with enemy forces, particularly as they move closer to the front lines in Mosul, the northern city that Iraqi forces are working to liberate from ISIS.

The President didn't acknowledge those deaths in his remarks, instead praising the work of the US military in Iraq.

"The results are very, very good," Trump said. "I just wanted to let everyone know."

Continued here:
Trump: US troops fighting 'like never before' in Iraq ...

The U.S. military is sending an additional two companies of soldiers to Iraq to help Iraqi troops fighting to retake Mosul from ISIS, defense officials confirmed to ABC News.

Two companies of soldiers is equal to between 200 to 300 soldiers.

Additional members of the 82nd Airborne Division's second combat brigade are deploying to Iraq on a temporary mission to provide additional "advise and assist" support to Iraqi forces, Colonel Joseph Scrocca, a spokesman for Operation Inherent Resolve told ABC News.

"This is not a new capability," said Scrocca. "It provides more advise and assist assets to our Iraqi partners."

This unit of the 82nd Airborne already has 1,700 soldiers in Iraq and Kuwait helping with the advise and assist mission for Iraqi troops.

"The number of soldiers does not equate to the remainder of the brigade as had previously been surmised," said Scrocca. News reports in recent weeks had said the Pentagon was considering sending possibly as many as 1,000 additional members from the brigade for the advise and assist mission in Mosul.

The authorized troop cap for Iraq is 5,262 though the real number is probably 6,000 with the presence of additional troops on temporary assignment. These new troops wont count towards the cap because theyre on temporary assignment.

In mid-February the Iraqi military began a final push to retake western Mosul from ISIS after having seized the eastern half of the city in a fierce 100-day battle that began in October. Iraqi troops are now facing stiff resistance from ISIS fighters as they fight through the tight quarters of the older western half of the city.

In Syria there are currently about 900 U.S. forces advising and assisting the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) fighting ISIS, even though the authorized troop level is 503.

The higher number is due to the recent addition of a Marine artillery unit helping with the SDF's offensive outside of Raqqa and a small complement of Army Rangers sent to the city of Manbij to ensure that Turkish-backed forces and SDF forces do not fight each other.

Continue reading here:
200 more US troops headed to Iraq to advise and assist ...