Mediaboss Marketing

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson sat down with British activist Tommy Robinson to discuss Robinsons years-long fight against Islamic Jihads increasing presence in Europe under the protection of multiculturalism.

Robinson, 41, was recently arrested in Canada and ordered to remain in the country over alleged immigration offenses before he was scheduled to speak at multiple events. The full interview between Peterson and Robinson was released on DailyWire+ on Monday.

During the discussion, Robinson told Peterson that he grew up in Luton, England, a town north of London that is now considered the epicenter of terrorist activities in Europe.

When I was born in 1982, there was one mosque, he said. Theres now 45 mosques.

The fertilizer bomb plot was planned in Luton, the 7/7 attacks, they got their bombs in Luton, the Stockholm bomber was radicalized in Luton, Robinson added. Terrorist attack after terrorist attack was orchestrated from Luton.

WATCH DR. JORDAN PETERSONS FULL INTERVIEW WITH TOMMY ROBINSON

Robinson described growing up and going to school in the British town, where Muslims, mainly from Pakistan, had migrated.

When I went to school, you had the Muslim playground and the non-Muslim playground, so I had very quick learning, he said.

Why were they segregated? Peterson asked.

Well, they segregate themselves. The Muslims did not integrate or assimilate, Robinson said. So when you go into the school dinner table, just so people can picture it, youll have white sitting with blacks and with Indians and with Sikhs and Hindus all sitting together. And in the corner thered be ten tables of Muslims. I never understood it as a child.

As Robinson grew older, he said that he learned more about the radical Islamic jihadists who had come to his town and how they coordinated with local street gangs that peddle drugs and prostitutes. Robinson added that these issues have been prevalent since 2004 when he began seeking to bring attention to them.

Theres a total two-tier policing operation in this town where they get away with what they want. The Islamic community gets whatever they want, he said in the interview. The police do not know how to deal with these problems.

Originally posted here:
They Segregate Themselves: Conservative Activist Tommy Robinson Joins Dr. Jordan Peterson To Talk Europes Growing Problem With Immigration,...

CANDACE OWENS (HOST): Jordan Peterson has built himself as somebody who is calm, who is rational, who relies on logic, who is a person who believes in radical free speech. He's now coming to the aid of his daughter and essentially doubling down on calling, which is, again, a 62-year-old man calling a 24-year-old a rat. And what is the reason, by the way? Because we should also say what is it that Nick Fuentes said that garnered that response from Jordan Peterson. And Nick Fuentes wrote one word on Twitter he wrote Jews. Now what was that in response to? Well, somebody asked the question. We know that Joe Biden is not in control of the White House. So who is in control of the White House? And Nick Fuentes wrote a one-word response Jews. He's saying Jews are in control of the White House, and that garnered a response from Jordan Peterson calling him a psychopathic rat. Now, we all know that Nick Fuentes has branded himself as somebody who expressly hates Zionism, he expressly hates Israel, and he is saying that Jews in the White House are now obviously in control because Joe Biden is not.

Now, to be fair, the Times of Israel has noted in the past this is an actual article from them all the Jews Biden has tapped for top roles in his new administration. This is from back in 2021 when Joe Biden first was inaugurated as president. And it goes on to say, Joe Biden filled the months before inauguration day, lining up a slate of cabinet secretaries, assistants, and advisers, many of them Jewish. It goes on to give us a rundown of all of the Jewish names, all of the Jews that they are saying are in his cabinet. You have Antony Blinken. You have David Cohen, the CIA director. You have Merrick Garland, the attorney general. You have Avril Haines, the director of National Intelligence. You have Ronald Klain, the chief of staff. So it seems a weird tweet for him to be so disturbed about.

Now, again, it's likely because Nick Fuentes has a very long background of focusing his attention on Israel and Zionism, and that's what he is reacting to. Also because Nick Fuentes has called out Jordan Peterson explicitly for a very long time as somebody who he believes has more of an allegiance to Israel than he does to Western civilization in general, essentially that he would put Israel before he would put Canada and before he would put America.

Now I don't know if that's a fair critique of Jordan Peterson, but I do know that it is off-brand for him to respond by calling someone a psychopathic rat. I mean, calling somebody a name, calling somebody an animal when you are billing yourself, right, as the calm, rational psychologist doctor who insists on logic and that the better ideas should win is just going to be off-brand.

Read the rest here:
In order to defend Nick Fuentes from Jordan Peterson, Candace Owens discusses how many Jews are in the Biden administration - Media Matters for...

Canadian psychologist, author, and media commentator Jordan Peterson has earned his own share of following over the past few years due to his innate ability to think critically. But of late, hes also been seen tearing up on a multitude of occasions, which some people have termed his crying spree, and it has garnered some negative reactions, except for Joe Rogan, who seemed to be in support of Peterson.

From crying during an interview with British journalist Piers Morgan about a remark actress Olivia Wilde made about him to shedding tears while discussing the power of Jesus Christ there are a number of videos online of instances when Jordan Peterson tears up. But Joe Rogan doesnt think that he was putting up an act. Why? Lets see what he had to say.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

During March 2024s Protect Our Parks episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, the host and his guests Mark Normand, Shane Gillis, and Ari Shaffir had a conversation regarding Jordan Peterson. A clip from that episode has surfaced on YouTube, with the guests expressing their dislike of the tendencies of the famed psychologist-cum-author to break out in tears every now and then. Thats when Rogan, who has had Peterson as a guest on his podcast, empathized with him and claimed that he really feels that way and more often than not people take that out of context.

Joe Rogan defends Jordan Peterson's emotional outburst! React!

Thats because he really feels that way. I know it seems crazy when you look at it out of context, but if you look at him crying in the context of the conversation, its because he really feels that, said Joe Rogan.Hes just being himself Hes being himself in front of all these people watching him. Meanwhile, one of the guests had a different take on it.

Ari Shaffir believes that fame has a way of affecting people and the work that they do in a negative way. While he said, Its just that fame ruins a lot of peoples life work, Joe Rogan would defend Jordan Peterson and say, Its also because youre a part of a system. Jordans not necessarily a part of a system. Hes like removed from the system but then the problem becomes, Are you all constantly fighting that system or are you just speaking about things the way you see them?'

via Getty

LAS VEGAS, NV JULY 05: UFC host and commentator Joe Rogan conducts a Q&A session with fans during day one of the UFC Fan Expo Las Vegas 2013 at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center on July 5, 2013 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Al Powers/Zuffa LLC/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images)

Jordan Peterson has been a guest on the JRE podcast on more occasions than one, and its understandable that Joe Rogan has gotten to know him better with their one-on-one conversations. Its not a surprise to see the 56-year-old support Peterson since the latter also spoke about Joe Rogan in a good light regarding his journey of becoming one of the most prominent figures in the media industry.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Is there anything left unsaid about how big the Joe Rogan experience is? Its the biggest podcast in the world and guess what? More than 11 million people view the show on every episode. His ability to get straight to the point and leave no stone unturned has made for some of the most interesting discussions for his fans and viewers, and Jordan Peterson believes that itsremarkable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Ive been watching you for a long time and its quite remarkable seeing the impact that you have that keeps increasing across the time I dont know if there has been anybody who has more impact as a single individual on the media environment worldwide than you do And I know you were set up to do that because you had multiple streams of income. You couldnt easily be taken out,said Jordan Peterson during a past JRE appearance.

What do you make of Joe Rogans explanation about Jordan Petersons breakdowns? Do you think the tears are earnest? Let us know in the comments down below.

Visit link:
The Problem Becomes Joe Rogan Publicly Defends Controversial Jordan Petersons Crying Spree as JRE Host Gives His Honest Verdict - EssentiallySports

Andrew Tate and ex-UFC welterweight Jake Shields are two of the most outspoken X/Twitter users, with both men known for their controversial views on anything and everything. This time, they've unintentionally come together to take aim at another controversial figure in clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson.

The topic of contention among the three is the Israel-Hamas war, which has caused a humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, along with criticism from the international community. Tate, a Muslim convert, has taken issue with the war due to the large Muslim population in Gaza.

Peterson, meanwhile, supports the Israeli war effort, and replied to Tate's claim that Israel tried to buy his own support by accusing the social media influencer of increasing moral decline. This, in turn, led to a response from Tate.

This drew former UFC fighter Shields into the fold. Shields is a staunch critic of Israel and a proponent of various antisemitic conspiracy theories. Naturally, he had his say on the matter, replying to both Tate and Peterson.

All three men are likely to continue engaging in a social media back-and-forth regarding their political views for as long as the Israel-Hamas war lasts.

While Andrew Tate only addressed Jordan Peterson once, Jake Shields did not. He also replied to the clinical psychologist describing Tate as a worsening person, claiming that the former kickboxer's stance angers him only because he was allegedly bought by Israel.

Shields will more likely continue to prod and poke at those he deems his ideological opposition, but his issues with Peterson are unlikely to lead to any serious discourse between the two men.

Why did you not like this content?

Cancel Submit

Was this article helpful?

Thank You for feedback

Edited by Tejas Rathi

Here is the original post:
Andrew Tate and UFC veteran join forces to take on Jordan Peterson's views on Israel: "Destroying Peterson feels like bullying" -...

Jordan Peterson, a Canadian psychologist, professor, and author, has garnered significant attention in the realm of self-help and motivational literature. His works, alongside other popular motivational books, focus on themes such as personal responsibility, meaning, and self-improvement. Petersons approach combines psychological insights, philosophical reflections, and mythological narratives to offer guidance on leading a disciplined and meaningful life.

Petersons most notable work, 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, outlines twelve practical principles aimed at helping readers navigate lifes complexities. The book emphasises the importance of personal responsibility, discipline, and finding meaning. Each rule, such as Stand up straight with your shoulders back and Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping, offers a blend of practical advice and deep psychological insights. The follow-up, Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life, presents additional rules that focus on balancing order and chaos. In this book, Peterson explores how to cope with the uncertainties of modern life, encouraging readers to embrace creativity and be grateful despite suffering.

George Carlin tells us exactly what he thinks of the self help industrial cash machine

Self-help books have become a pervasive element of contemporary culture, promising readers a pathway to personal development, success, and happiness. While these books can offer valuable insights and practical advice, they are also subject to significant critique. This essay will examine the criticisms of self-help literature, addressing issues such as oversimplification, commercialisation, and the potential for unrealistic expectations.

One of the primary criticisms of self-help books is their tendency to oversimplify complex issues. Many self-help authors distil intricate psychological, emotional, and social problems into a set of easy-to-follow steps or rules. While this simplification can make the advice more accessible, it often fails to acknowledge the nuanced nature of human experience. For instance, books like Jordan Petersons 12 Rules for Life provide structured guidelines for living a more disciplined life. However, critics argue that such advice can be reductive, as it may not account for individual differences or the multifaceted nature of personal and societal challenges.

Another significant critique is the commercialisation of self-help literature. The self-help industry is a multi-billion-pound market, with authors, publishers, and marketers all capitalising on individuals desires for self-improvement. This commercial aspect can lead to the production of books that prioritise profitability over genuine value. Bestselling titles often rely on catchy titles, simplistic messages, and the promise of quick fixes, which can mislead readers into believing that profound personal change can be achieved effortlessly. This commercial approach can undermine the credibility of the advice offered, as it raises questions about the true motivations behind the authors work.

Self-help books also often promote the notion of individualism, which can be both empowering and problematic. On one hand, emphasising personal responsibility and self-reliance can encourage readers to take control of their lives and make positive changes. On the other hand, this focus on individualism can obscure the importance of social, economic, and structural factors that significantly influence ones life circumstances. For example, while books like Stephen R. Coveys The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People advocate for personal accountability, they may inadvertently ignore the systemic barriers that hinder many individuals from achieving their goals.

Furthermore, self-help literature can create unrealistic expectations. Many books in this genre are filled with success stories and anecdotes that portray transformation as an attainable goal for everyone. However, these narratives often gloss over the difficulties and setbacks that are an inherent part of the process. Readers may become disillusioned or feel inadequate when they fail to achieve the same results, leading to a sense of failure and frustration. This can be particularly damaging for individuals who are already struggling with self-esteem or mental health issues.

Despite these criticisms, it is important to acknowledge that self-help books can still offer genuine benefits. They can provide motivation, introduce new perspectives, and offer practical strategies for personal growth. Books like James Clears Atomic Habits provide readers with actionable advice on building positive habits and breaking negative ones, which can lead to meaningful improvements in their lives. However, it is crucial for readers to approach self-help literature with a critical mind, recognising its limitations and contextualising its advice within their own unique circumstances.

Therefore, while self-help books can serve as valuable resources for personal development, they have multiple flaws. The tendency to oversimplify complex issues, the commercial pressures driving their production, the emphasis on individualism, and the potential to create unrealistic expectations are all valid critiques that readers must consider. Ultimately, self-help books should be viewed as one of many tools available for personal growth, rather than as definitive solutions. By maintaining a critical perspective, readers can better navigate the vast landscape of self-help literature and extract the most useful insights for their individual journeys. However, this can incur great costs and tends to benefit only those who already have the resources. It is the resources that offer the opportunities to change ones life much more than the self help gurus.

KEEP US ALIVE and join us in helping to bring reality and decency back by SUBSCRIBING to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1Ll1ylCg8U19AhNl-NoTg AND SUPPORTING US where you can: Award Winning Independent Citizen Media Needs Your Help. PLEASE SUPPORT US FOR JUST 2 A MONTH https://dorseteye.com/donate/

Visit link:
From Beyond the Grave: George Carlin's message to Jordan Peterson and other self help gurus - Dorset Eye | Independent Citizen Media