Archive for the ‘Jordan Peterson’ Category

Elon Musk and an offer Twitter will resist | Onmanorama – Onmanorama

Elon Musk is all set to buy Twitter for around $43 billion, as his best and final offer. He has already acquired 9.2 per cent of its shares. What he would like to do though is to buy up Twitter and change its functioning because it censors free speech, which Elon Musk believes, is essential for democracy and its future.

Here is what Twitter says about its policy of censorship on free speech on its site:

We will review and take enforcement action against accounts that target an individual, group of people, or a protected category with any of the following behavior in their profile information, i.e., usernames, display names, or profile bios:

Abusive slurs, epithets, racist, or sexist tropes

we will still take action against these accounts if we receive reports about Tweets or Direct Messages that are in violation of our other policies

If an accounts profile information includes any of the abusive behaviors listed above, we will permanently suspend the account on the first violation

The words sound like the issuance of a court, the preamble of a faceless but omnipresent judge; someone who might preside over the proceedings of a Kafkaesque trial before he sentences the suspect to death and damnation by hanging. Please note that Twitter reserves the right to interpret what exactly constitutes an offence.

But Twitter, like Facebook, is a company. Just a company. Its shares are up for buy and sell. Both forums favour progressive, and liberal speech. Indeed, Facebook these days is so censoriously sensitive that your posts take time to hit the screen because their AI machines are running filters on every word; this is especially so if your track record as a writer or consumer has a record of offences.

Elon Musk is in effect a Libertarian, one who values the idea of liberty over all else. He has stated that he is socially and culturally tolerant and open, and financially prudent.

He believes in governments that least govern, by which he means the government must not interfere in your private lives, but makes lives in general easier. He certainly does not believe in elected governments defining free speech or censoring your thought. Our increasing and eager reliance on emojis to convey the harmlessness of our intent in each exchange is fundamentally an indication of our growing and craven preference for large, rounded, general feelings rather than eccentric and edged expressions of our individuality.

In these fluid and volatile social media times, the government is not the only agency that controls speech. It is Multi-National Corporationswhich at one time were considered sources of social and political evil as well. This amounts to a tectonic shift in our idea and practice of communication. Because non-State players do not abide by penal codes or the Constitution.

Thats why even when Chris Rock says he forgives Will Smith and refuses to press charges, you have the Oscar Academy, under pressure to appear good and correct, imposing a 10-year ban on the star.

Effectively, a non-State player, terrorised by the equally non-State backlash, has passed a life sentence on the actor. There is no law involved in this, only the perception of a feeling, and what that feeling might entail in terms of the cancellation of the Oscar Academy itself by social media addicts, whose numbers are legion.

Indeed, the way it is going, the function of the Greek chorus as the conscience of the play has now been usurped by social media: the tragedy can continue as comedy.

While technology flatters you with the addictive delusion (there are millions of men and women working for Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey or Bret Taylor from morning to evening without being paid a dime and still think they are doing themselves a favor; this is the international labor force that, unbeknownst to themselves, has destroyed the idea that labor has monetary value) that you have important things to say and you have a forum for saying these, the fear that their platform could be taken away from them at any given moment by a wage-less and silent robot itself controls thought.

That we have until recently in our civilizational evolution found in the State an enemy in whom we can easily trace the source of most of our free speech censorship, we are now confronted with the problem of experiencing the definition of free speech and its censorship to private companieswhose reason for existence is profit.

But none of it washes, really. A couple of years ago, when Jack Dorsey visited India, a bunch of well-known women posed with Dorsey as if he was the Messiah of the Media Freedom; it was as if they thought he was not a capitalist running a company, but an altruist running a liberal movement: A suited Christ propagating the new secular Gospel in 150 characters, or whatever was the limit then.

In Naipauls The Mimic Men, the disgraced colonial politician, Ralph Singh, says: Understand the language I use. I am describing a failure, a deficiency; The articulation of our deficiencies cannot be always without causing offence. But mass platforms like Twitter and FB encourage what amounts to a forced conformism of speech he or she may not believe in given his individual experience. That someone like Jordan Peterson, a free-thinking and controversial academic from Canada, had to fight the government of his country and the social media for his right Not to use prescribed gender-neutral pronouns is an indication of where we are heading: toward totally policed thought, the perfect Stalinist dream.

Elon Musk puts the money where his mouth is. Unlike most billionaire businessmen across the world, Musk still comes across as a human being and not a corporation. And as a human being, he is aware of the inalienable condition of existence: the articulation of ones deficiencies in a language that might often offend.

In short, Musk would like to buy Twitter so the platform is a place to communicate, not observe silence. He understands that human speech unless it is occurring in an Orwellian or a Stalinist society, cannot be worth anything without a measure of offence.

The real significance of Musks offer of $43 billion for Twitter is that it is the price of free speech. Finally, we have a number for our thoughts. But Twitter considers it as the price of its right to censorship. So in effect, $43 billion, the offer which Twitter will not accept, is the price of an enforced silence on humanity.

(CP Surendran is an author and senior journalist. Views are personal.)

Read more here:
Elon Musk and an offer Twitter will resist | Onmanorama - Onmanorama

Jordan Peterson Champions Capitalism At Bitcoin 2022 – Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin 2022 is a gathering of freedom, a place for conversations of sovereignty; and who better to invite to speak than Jordan Peterson, a prominent Canadian psychologist whos attracted much attention for his books and podcast appearances. Peterson has been classified as the most influential public intellectual in the Western world right now, and a right-wing internet celebrity, but his wide appeal certainly testifies to the fact that hes speaking to a growing audience of people seeking his ideals.

His fireside appearance was hosted by Tuur Demeester, an early bitcoin investor and analyst.Given Demeesters experience and knowledge, it was set to be an excellent discussion.

Much of the Bitcoin community already has an ideological intersection with Peterson. At the conference, his chat was delivered to a very crowded audience people were interested in what he had to say.

Demeester started by asking Peterson about what sparked his entrepreneurial ventures. Peterson responded, The most appropriate way to understand something is to try it. In a way, its a nod to proof of work as a concept.

Peterson then jumped into what became the main theme of his responses, which was his profuse belief in capitalism.

Dont be defensive about the ethics of your capitalistic enterprise, on the contrary you should be on the offensive, proudly proclaiming that people should ... make free choices about what they value.

He added, One of the fundamental axioms of a free market system is that the only way to properly compute the horizon of the future is by sampling and perhaps summing the free choice of a multitude of free agents.

Demeester asked Peterson about his curiosity in Bitcoin, to which Peterson replied, First of all, I thought I would be motivated to understand bitcoin if I actually invested some money in it because I do believe the proposition that you don't really make genuine decisions if your sampling a domain unless you have skin in the game.

But Peterson wasnt entirely bullish on Bitcoin he did have a demeanor of cautious optimism.

We have no idea what would happen if money per se was actually decentralized If we manage that and say Bitcoin maintains privacy, is it irreversible? Is that permanent? Well what if its a bad idea and its irreversible?

Peterson rounded back to capitalism to finish off, saying, Here's two justifications for free markets and capitalism. It gives warlike people something to do that isn't destructive.

He then added, If you can't make your idea attractive enough to other people so that they're willing to give you money, it's possible that its a stupid idea and youre doing it badly We shouldnt subsidize zombies. Do you want to be one?

Bitcoin 2022 is part of the Bitcoin Event Series hosted by BTC Inc, the parent company of Bitcoin Magazine.

Read the original post:
Jordan Peterson Champions Capitalism At Bitcoin 2022 - Bitcoin Magazine

NFTs Outperformed Cryptos Over Q1 2022 – Crypto Briefing

Key Takeaways

Nansen has published its quarterly report on non-fungible tokens. The NFT market has outperformed the cryptocurrency market so far this year, but there have been significant differences in the growth of different NFT sectors.

Compared to the overall crypto market, NFTs have fared quite well in Q1 2022, though not all were winners.

Nansen, the blockchain analytics platform, released its 2022 quarterly NFT report today, a report preceded by the firms indexing methodology that was formalized last January. In February, the firm launched its NFT market (NFT-500) fund that would track the broader NFT market, as well as the Blue Chip-10, Social-100, Game-50, Art-20, and Metaverse-20.

The non-fungible token market has outperformed the broader cryptocurrency market performance year-to-date, as evidenced by the NFT-500 Indexs price appreciation of 49.9% so far in 2022 when denominated in Ethereum. Nevertheless, the report noted how the NFT market was not immune to the correction seen in the crypto market overall from last February, but that downtrend seemed to reverse in the last month: the NFT-500 jumped 5.9% in March.

The different segments (and corresponding indices) of the NFT market yielded disparate performances. The Metaverse-20 index grew by 129.4% in Q1 (denominated in ETH), while the gaming and art NFT sectors growth decreased. The Gaming-50 index was the worst performing NFT sector Nansen tracked, fueled largely by declines in Play-to-Earn and Role Playing Game NFTs. The Art-20 indexs decline was attributed primarily to a drop in prices for Generative Art NFTs.

The differing NFT sectors also differed wildly in terms of volatility. Metaverse NFTs were the most volatile, whereas Blue Chip NFTs, to which Nansen recently added Azuki, Clone X, and Doodles, were the least volatile.

Louisa Choe, a research analyst at Nansen, said:

The NFT segment of the cryptocurrency market is fast-growing and dynamic and has proved to resonate with retail investors over the past year, with significant growth in Q1 of 2022. As more artists, creators, builders, and community members innovate with the NFT market we believe we will see a rebalancing of which sectors become its driving force.

In addition to outperforming the rest of the cryptocurrency market in Q1, NFTs were also relatively uncorrelated to other crypto assets.

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

OVR is the decentralized infrastructure for the metaverse, merging physical and virtual world through Augmented Reality, creating a new dimension where everything is possible.Its composed of 1.6 trillion unique hexagons...

After a breakout year for the technology in 2021, NFT hype is still going strong. Ethereum NFT Market Roars Ethereum holders might have had a difficult start to 2022, but...

The floor prices of top NFT collections are trending lower, with notable collections such as Bored Ape Yacht Club down almost 30% over the past month. NFT Mania Starts to...

Over $200 billion in value has been wiped out of the crypto market after Russia launched a full-blown military attack on Ukraine earlier this morning. The two biggest cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin...

Continue reading here:
NFTs Outperformed Cryptos Over Q1 2022 - Crypto Briefing

Opinion: As the Fed Tightens, VCs Are Spending Big on Crypto – Crypto Briefing

Share this article

The Feds Quantitative tightening will make it difficult for risk-on assets like cryptocurrencies to shine. But at the same time, money from venture capital firms keeps pouring into the space.

Despite a strong start to April, the bullish momentum in the crypto market has definitely cooled off. Last weeks FOMC minutes put a damper on Bitcoins recent rally even after Mayor Francis Suarez unveiled a snazzy new cyber charging bull at the Bitcoin 2022 conference in Miami. Since then weve descended further, tentatively finding support and bouncing from around $39,400.

With consumer price index data slated to reveal another month of record-breaking inflation, the gist from the Fed is that the prospects for the U.S. stock market arent looking so great. In a bid to offset the rampant inflation caused partly by the economic response to Covid-19, and party by commodity supply shocks triggered by Russias invasion of Ukraine, the Fed now needs to unwind its balance sheet comprising mainly of bonds and mortgage-backed securities. This process is known as quantitative tightening, which, grossly oversimplified, means the Fed is trying to suck money out of the economy.

It plans to do this by selling off $95 billion worth of assets every month to meet its projected targets. But thats just the tip of the icebergthe Fed is currently sitting on a whopping $9 trillion worth of assets. Although a good chunk of this is bonds that will expire to maturity over the next few years, the total amount is still substantially larger than the $4.5 trillion the Fed held the last time it implemented quantitative tightening in 2017.

Selling bonds back to the market aims to decrease their price and increase their yields (bond prices and yields are inversely correlated), which means that borrowing becomes more expensive and, since all money is born as debt, money becomes scarcer. Less money in the economy means less demand for goods and services, which should, in theory, suppress inflation, but also less speculating and investing, which is bad for risk-on assets like stonks and crypto.

Another key takeaway from the FOMC minutes is that the Fed is considering selling mortgage-backed securities for the first time as part of its tightening regime. Like the unprecedentedly high asset unwinding that needs to take place, an MBS sale could also have an yet unknown disruptive effect on the U.S. economy. Markets can handle positive or negative sentiment, but things can get scary when the outlook becomes hard to predict.

That all sounds pretty bleak, and it might end up being so for traditional markets. However, you can barely believe the bearish macroeconomic outlook with so much money continually pouring into crypto. As the Fed ruminates about raising rates and selling assets, venture capital firms throw money around like they print the stuff.

Last week saw Axie Infinity developer Sky Mavis rake in $150 million, NEAR Protocol $350 million, and Binance.US a cool $200 million at a $4.5 billion valuation. The list of those investing contains all the usual suspects: Andreessen Horowitz, Tiger Global, Paradigm, and even contributions from TradFi firms like VanEck.

So what can we make of this? On the one hand, the Feds comments imply hard times ahead, but on the other, VCs appear fearless about investing in crypto. To me, one explanation comes to mind. While the short to medium-term macro environment will likely keep things turbulent, investment firms believe it wont be bad enough to do any serious damage. A lot of crypto investors, especially the institutional ones, will be thinking on longer-term time horizons. At the end of the day, theres no sense in passing up what they believe is a great long-term investment opportunity because of some temporary quantitative tightening.

Disclosure: At the time of writing this feature, the author owned ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

OVR is the decentralized infrastructure for the metaverse, merging physical and virtual world through Augmented Reality, creating a new dimension where everything is possible.Its composed of 1.6 trillion unique hexagons...

Around 72% of financial advisors would invest more into crypto if crypto spot ETFs were available in the U.S, according to a new survey by the New York City-based stock...

Bitcoin broke below $42,000 as the market sold off earlier this morning. Crypto Market Suffers Dip Below $2T The global cryptocurrency market cap has tumbled below $2 trillion yet again....

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has delivered her first full-length speech on cryptocurrencies following President Bidens crypto-focused Executive Order at the beginning of March. Yellen Shares Stablecoin Concerns Stablecoins appear to...

Go here to read the rest:
Opinion: As the Fed Tightens, VCs Are Spending Big on Crypto - Crypto Briefing

Father Stu Is One of The Best Faith-Based Films Ever But Will Anyone See It? – Religion Unplugged

(REVIEW) Father Stu nails the faith-based formula better than maybe any other faith-based film. But it remains to be seen if audiences will come out to see a faith-based film with so much cussing or where the hero leaves the girl to pursue God.

The movie tells the true story of Stuart Long (Mark Wahlberg) an immature, self-centered boxer-turned-aspiring actor with an estranged father (Mel Gibson) and dysfunctional mother who has a religious experience and decides to become a Catholic priest against the wishes of his family, his girlfriend and eventually the church itself before becoming an inspiration to many.

Father Stu is a passion project for Wahlberg, an openly devout Catholic. He has described to America Magazine the movie as the most important movie (hes) ever done and the best movie (hes) ever been a part of. He put a lot of his own money into the film to make it a reality, calling it to Religion News his love letter to God and part of the next phase of his career, in which hes going to focus on faith-based films and films that do good in the world.

Wahlberg explained to America Magazine, Ive always been like, OK, as soon as I get to a certain place, and I have a certain voice and reach and platform, then Ill start doing more things that will move the needle in terms of my faith, and things that I think could be productive, helpful and in service. So when this project came to me, I was like, You know what? I need to go make this.

Wahlberg was inspired by Father Stus life how after a sinful life, he found redemption in faith in Christ and spent the rest of his life showing to others the grace that God had shown him. He got a screenplay from actress and screenwriter Rosalind Ross girlfriend of Wahlbergs friend Mel Gibson and was so impressed with it that he made her the director.

We wanted to make a movie that was edgy and real and relatable to everybody, Wahlberg continued And Stu was one of those guys that when he did his prison ministries, it was where he was most effective because he could speak with (prisoners) on their level, and he understood that he was one of them and that he had been in those seats. And now he was on the other side, and he was reminding them that Gods not going to give up on you, and neither is he.

Although Father Stu is being touted as a faith-based film, Wahlberg is clear in his remarks to Screen Rant that this is a different kind of faith-based film.

I mean, its a rated-R film, he said. Its got language, its got a lot of very raw elements to it. But its also got a lot of humor. Its got a lot of heart. Ive seen a lot of faith-based movies that really preach to the choir, and this is a movie for everybody. This is really encouraging people to not give up on themselves, to see the good in others and to have hope and hopefully reignite their faith, whatever that is.

As someone who has watched and written about faith-based films for a long time, I have a particular appreciation for the uniqueness of what Wahlberg was trying to do with Father Stu. On the one hand, its not like there havent been any religious films that have been edgy or rated R. First Reformed and Silence were celebrated religious films that were heavily mature. But those films were arthouse films that focused on deconstructing religion. What makes Father Stu unique is that it is trying to do what mainstream faith-based films do but in a way that isnt watered down.

People make faith-based films and watch faith-based films in order to express and relive the reasons they love having a relationship with God. Its a form of worship, just like when people make and watch romances to express and relive why they love romantic love and when people make and watch superhero movies to express and relive their love for the heroic ideal.

Wahlberg is motivated by the same desire as faith-based filmmakers to celebrate and pass on the good that God has done for them to others with their filmmaking. Its that same desire to watch that story that has turned faith-based filmmaking into such a consistently massive success despite consistent bad reviews.

Where these faith-based films typically go wrong aside from the bad screenwriting and acting is in their squeamishness at showing the ugliness and messiness of life even as they try to show God redeeming the same ugliness and messiness. They want to show how God redeems people from their brokenness but dont want to show the brokenness that people are being saved from because it drags their minds back into the brokenness rather than the redemption. This is definitely true of some films Im looking at you, The Wolf of Wall Street. But Christian films tend to fall into the opposite error, where you cant see Gods redemption of brokenness because you dont see enough of the brokenness Hes redeeming people from.

Gibson, who plays Stuart Longs father in the film, spoke to The Daily Wire and agreed that this is a problem in most faith-based films:

They keep things pretty sanitized. And thats not who we are. I mean, hey, were here because were a bunch of sinners, right? So this film shows you that. It shows that you can come from the depths of all human weakness and kind of be better than that.

This is one reason I was happily stunned by Father Stu. Its a movie that succeeds at making the Christian film that other Christian films try to, and it knocks it out of the park in all the ways the other movies consistently fail.

First, the quality is on par with any other Hollywood inspirational drama. The acting, screenwriting, camerawork all the aspects of filmmaking range from excellent to at least unobjectionable. The acting is particularly good, with Wahlberg and Gibson completely believable and endlessly entertaining as a dysfunctional father and son. Jackie Weaver is perfectly cast as Stuart Longs mother, as are most of the other characters in the movie. In fact, I would say that as an inspirational drama, this movie is far better.

Next, Father Stu spends a lot of time on Stu before he becomes a Christian and doesnt shy away from what an immature jerk he was nor does it shy away from what toxic people his mom and dad are or how broken the family and their relationships are. Once Stu becomes a Christian and determines to join the priesthood, he doesnt become a more boring and more passive character; he becomes more interesting as he balances his submission to God and the church with his inherent bullheadedness, which bring him into often righteous conflict with his parents, his girlfriend, his fellow priests-in-training and the church leadership.

The arguments Stu has with his family and his community never stop no matter how holy he gets and are always incredibly entertaining. Moreover, the closer he gets to God, the more suffering he experiences, and the more suffering experiences, the more he has to reevaluate his beliefs and get deeper answers. Not only that, but the more suffering he experiences, the closer to his family and community he gets, which because theyve made their relationships so entertaining only makes the movie more fun to watch.

This theme that struggle and suffering cause redemption is something that we rarely see depicted so well. Christian stories that show redemption coming when the suffering is over or the suffering is accepted and religious movies that embrace suffering (Winter Light, Faith Based, First Reformed, Silence) tend to leave their protagonists with less faith at the end of their stories. But Father Stu shows constant struggle and wrestling as the goal of the Christian life and the mechanism of that redemption. The more Stuart Long struggles with God and others, the closer he gets to them.

Mel Gibson elaborated on the importance of this for Stu. He sort of thanks God for his suffering, Gibson said. Hes not praying for an easy life just the grace to live faithfully through a difficult one We dont necessarily win in this life. Thats not what its about. Every one of us has got a boulder that were dragging around somewhere. Were all gonna get knocked over. Weve all got a burden that we have to go through, some more than others, you know? And (Stu) had a heavy one. But man, he was an example of how to triumph over that and weave gold out of it.

Its no wonder why Mark Wahlberg and Mel Gibson both gravitated toward this story. Both have violent and checkered pasts, and both have turned toward their faith as a method of redemption. Those who have forgiven Wahlberg and Gibson for their past will see this as adding another layer of authenticity to the story. Those who have not will see this as another example of two powerful men trying to spin their history into a redemption story.

We both had troubled pasts, Wahlberg said, referring to how his story intersects with Stuart Longs. He figured it all out, but Im still working on things. Elsewhere, Wahlberg elaborated, When all was said and done, and I was alone, and my friends werent there for me anymore, I had my faith, and I had people of faith trying to point me in the right direction. I had real success and experience in focusing my faith and trying to do the right thing, and then getting good results.

This is also one of the few faith-based films that seems particularly designed to appeal to men ironically, since it is also one of the few faith-based films directed by a woman. As a man, Ive often found that the women I know have enjoyed Christian movies more than I have. This makes sense; most Christian moviegoing audiences are women, just like most churchgoers in Western churches are women. Therefore, Christian movies are made primarily with Christian women in mind rather than Christian men.

David Murrow pointed out in his book Why Men Hate Going to Church that women tend to overwhelmingly like stories that resemble romances, and men tend to overwhelmingly prefer stories that resemble action adventure stories. Men like action films more than women even when the protagonist is a woman. This is why most Western churches, where the congregations are overwhelmingly female, and Christian films, whose audience is overwhelmingly female, tend to portray the Christian story primarily as a romance in which the protagonist desires to be loved but resists the love of our lover until through the lovers woo-ing, they discover their lover was their one true love all along.

Also, while most Christian films are made by male directors and feature male protagonists, most of them involve the male protagonist fulfilling married female fantasies, such as husbands apologizing to their wives or girlfriends (Fireproof, American Underdog, War Room, I Can Only Imagine, The Shack) or being better fathers (Courageous, Christmas Shoes, Overcomer, I Can Only Imagine, War Room). The average faith-based film is a Christian womans fantasy: The closer the male protagonist gets to God, the closer he gets to her ideal man.

But Father Stu, while it does follow many of these plot lines, also subverts many of them and merges them with storylines that appeal more to men as well. The movie plays out particularly in the second half as an action or sports movie in which Stuart has to overcome external obstacles by conquering inner demons while tossing quips around like a faith-based Tony Stark. In fact, in contrast to most faith-based films, in order to follow God, Stuart has to defy not only the advice of the men in his life and sometimes church authority but the women in his life too. This is a common experience for men including religious men but it doesnt often make it into faith-based films.

Sadly, despite this being perhaps the best example of the faith-based formula, the movie will probably be ignored by faith-based and secular audiences alike. Secular audiences typically dont come out for anything too heavily religious (e.g., Calvary, Silence, First Reformed), and Christian audiences have a real heavy allergy to swearing, too much veneration of Mary, and portrayals of premarital sex. In probably this movies one really bad misstep to me, Stuart Long and his girlfriend have sex before he decides to become a priest. They do show how that deepens the hurt for her when they break up, but they treat it lightly enough that most Christians will probably find it objectionable.

Christians relationship with swearing in movies tends to perplex and frustrate outsiders. Many Christians see swearing as part of the ugliness in the world, and seeing that in a movie distracts them from experiencing Gods redemption of the ugliness in the world. To people who arent bothered by swearing, this can seem hypocritical, since Christians dont typically have the same problems with depictions of violence as The Passion of The Christ and Hacksaw Ridge can attest which is far worse than swearing. To this, Christians surprisingly, rightly argue that unlike swearing, violence in movies doesnt lead to imitation.

Personally, I dont have a problem with swearing in movies like many Chrsitians do, but I do respect why others do. Even so, to me the swearing in this film serves the same purpose of glorifying God that the explicit violence did in The Passion of The Christ: It increases the authenticity, which makes seeing Gods glory all the more clear. This is how real people like those depicted in the story that need Gods grace actually talk. Even if Christians dont see it that way, though, I hope that Christians dont let that keep them from seeing the movie, since this is exactly the kind of faith-based film we should be encouraging people to make.

That said, I think the fact that Stu and his girlfriend dont get together is going to be maybe the bigger issue that will keep people away from the movie even if they dont admit it. Men wont like it because it will make them choose between their fantasy of getting the girl and their fantasy of being close to God. Women wont like it because it means the closer the hero gets to God, the further he gets from the character they identify with. This isnt theoretical. A gal friend of mine stayed behind from the screener for that very reason.

On the one hand, this is too bad. After all, its a true story, and this is the way it really happened. And its good for the many single Christians to see that a single life can be a life glorifying to God. However, I do relate to feeling the lack of movies that give a picture of what it looks like to integrate my romantic longings with my spiritual longings. So perhaps that would be a good thing to explore in these filmmakers next faith-based project.

That said, theres a chance that Father Stu will do quite well. Mel Gibson who produced the movie and whose girlfriend directed and wrote it has consistently been the one guy whos been able to make R-rated movies that appeal to faith-based audiences (Passion of The Christ, Hacksaw Ridge), so a Gibson-backed project is a better bet than most. And The Daily Wire has also recently had similar success getting faith-based audiences to support its own R-rated movies, and they have been promoting Father Stu as well. Similarly, the popularity of people like Jordan Peterson and a growing Christian masculinity movement show theres a growing interest among men in expressions of Christianity that appeal more to their sensibilities.

Mark Wahlberg told Today he is hopeful that the movie does well and that this opens up further opportunities to make similar films that can give people hope and connect them with their faith:

If people really recognize the power of the film, then maybe those things will happen, you know? Well see. But you know, again, if this movie does a lot and it does a lot of business, itll do a lot for people, and then well be able to do a lot with the success of the film to help others.

I hope that people who constantly say they want great faith-based movies will turn out for Father Stu. And I hope that Christians who normally would shy away from movies with rough dialogue will give it a chance. As someone who hungers for quality and authentic representations of faith onscreen that celebrate God rather than simply deconstruct him, I hope that this movie does well and inspires other moviegoers to follow in its footsteps.

Joseph Holmes is an award-nominated filmmaker and culture critic living in New York City. He is co-host of the podcast The Overthinkers and its companion website theoverthinkersjournal.com, where he discusses art, culture and faith with his fellow overthinkers.

More:
Father Stu Is One of The Best Faith-Based Films Ever But Will Anyone See It? - Religion Unplugged