Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

The Australian forgets that it was Liberals stacked AAT – Crikey

The Australian forgets that it was Liberals stacked AAT Join us on socialNewslettersGet Access Code.

Enter your email address and Crikey will send a Verification Code

Enter the Verification Code sent to

to confirm your account.The Verification Code will expire in 1 hour.

Contact us on: support@crikey.com.au or call the hotline: +61 (03) 8623 9900.

The Australian has decried the AAT as 'politically stacked' some time in the 'past three years'. Who was responsible, we wonder?

Remind me again, who was it that stacked the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) with its political mates, cronies, hacks, former staffers, failed candidates and those generally needing somewhere to go after being voted out of government?

Today, incomprehensibly, Australia's national daily failed to nail the Coalition government as being responsible for what is very likely the most egregious and audacious stacking ever of an independent government body.

The Australian has found a sudden concern for the integrity of the AAT, given it is set to have the power to sign off on warrants for anti-corruption investigators to tap the phones of pretty well any current or former public official up to and including the prime minister.The powers are found in proposed legislation for the government's new national anti-corruption commission.

Already a subscriber? Log in to keep reading.Or, register your email address for a FREE 21-day trial.

David Hardaker

Investigations Editor @d_hardaker

David Hardaker has an extensive career as a journalist and broadcaster, primarily at the ABC where he worked on flagship programs such as Four Corners, 7.30, Foreign Correspondent, AM and PM. He spent eight years reporting in the Middle East and can speak Arabic.

Insert

" + _localizedStrings.redirect_overlay_title + "

" + _localizedStrings.redirect_overlay_text + "

See the original post here:
The Australian forgets that it was Liberals stacked AAT - Crikey

Federal Labor’s honeymoon continues in Resolve poll; can the Liberals regain office without those ‘lefties’? – The Conversation

A federal Resolve poll for Nine newspapers, conducted October 5-9 from a sample of 1,604, gave Labor 39% of the primary vote (steady since September), the Coalition 30% (down two), the Greens 12% (up two), One Nation 5% (down one), the UAP 3% (up one), independents 9% (up one) and others 2% (down one).

Resolve does not give a two party estimate until close to elections, but using 2022 election preference flows gives Labor a 59-41 lead, a two-point gain for Labor since the September poll.

On Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, 60% thought he was doing a good job and 24% a poor job, for a net approval of +36, unchanged since September. Opposition Leader Peter Duttons net approval was -10, up two points. Albanese led Dutton by 53-18 as preferred PM (53-19 in September).

Labor led the Liberals by 36-30 on economic management (33-30 in September). On keeping the cost of living low, Labor led by 30-20 (31-23 previously).

The polling now is not predictive of the next election that is due by 2025, but for the moment Labors honeymoon is continuing.

Respondents were told that the federal budget was in deficit, and that this is needed to maintain current levels of spending, but means the national debt is increasing. 37% thought we should reduce spending to end deficits earlier, 14% increase taxes and 28% live with the debt and deficit levels.

Asked to select the top priority for spending reduction, 33% chose defence, 14% the NDIS, 11% the health system and 4% aged care.

By 38-20, voters supported delivering on the stage 3 tax cuts in 2024, which would mean everyone earning between $45,000 and $120,000 per year would pay a single 30% income tax rate. This does not mention high-income earners would benefit most, and so is a skewed question.

By 34-13, voters supported repealing stage three if the government were to increase tax revenue. But increasing the corporate tax rate (61-10 support) and an increased tax on resource companies profits (56-9 support) were far more popular.

I previously covered polling of both the Indigenous Voice to parliament and the republic in the last Resolve poll. The Voice led by 64-36, while the republic trailed by 54-46.

In last weeks Essential poll, conducted in the days before October 4 from a sample of 1,050, 43% thought Australia was not doing enough to address climate change (down four since May), 32% thought we were doing enough (steady), and 13% doing too much (up two). The Coalition was still in government at the May poll.

By 63-21, respondents said they had not been personally affected by the recent Optus data breach. 53% said they were very concerned about scammers being able to steal their identities to access their bank accounts.

By 51-29, respondents supported stronger restrictions on the amount of personal infromation companies can collect, and by 46-27 they supported more restrictions on governments collecting personal information.

Respondents were pessimistic about the future of humanity, with more undecided at longer time intervals. Asked whether life would be better or worse for humanity in ten years, worse led by 42-33. At 100 years, worse led by 39-28. At 1,000 years, worse led by 36-22. At 10,000 years, worse led by 35-20.

Dynata conducted a survey for the left-wing Australia Institute in early September from a sample of 1,409. By 41-22, respondents supported Labor repealing the stage three income tax cuts. 46% said high-income earners would benefit most from these cuts, 18% middle-income earners and just 8% low-income earners.

Respondents were read a brief statement about the stage three tax cuts, and asked which was more important: keeping election promises regardless of changes in economic circumstances, or adapting economic policy to suit changing circumstances even if that means breaking an election promise. By 61-27, respondents supported the latter proposition.

A new poll for The Australia Institute, conducted October 4-7 from a sample of 1,003, had support for scrapping the stage three tax cuts up seven from September to 48%, with opposition unchanged at 22%.

In last weeks Morgan poll, Labor led by 55-45 from polling conducted September 26 to October 2. This was a 0.5-point gain for Labor since the previous week, and Labors best result in this poll since the election.

Federal Liberal vice-president Teena McQueen recently told the Australian Conservative Political Action Conference that: The good thing about the last federal election is a lot of those lefties are gone. We should rejoice in that.

Read more: View from The Hill: Without those 'lefties' the Liberals can't regain government

At the May federal election, the seats held by more moderate Liberals in inner metro regions were lost to teal independents. It will be difficult for the Coalition to regain these seats as independents, once established in a seat, are usually re-elected easily.

However, as I said in my article on the final results of the election, the Coalitions best chance to regain government in 2025 is if economic conditions are lousy, and they can win outer metro seats from Labor.

The next election probably depends on the outer metro, not the inner metro. The Coalition can do without its inner city moderates if it wins the rest of Australia by a large enough margin.

There may be a long-term electoral problem for the Coalition: Australias population is far more concentrated in cities than either the United States or the United Kingdom. I argued before the election that this urban concentration helps Labor, and the election results validated this argument.

Read more: Will a continuing education divide eventually favour Labor electorally due to our big cities?

I covered the October 2 first round of the Brazilian presidential election for The Poll Bludger. The leftist Luiz Incio Lula da Silva (called Lula), who was president from 2003 to 2010, led the far-right inucmbent Jair Bolsonaro by a 48.4-43.2 margin. But as nobody won over 50%, it goes to an October 30 runoff between Lula and Bolsonaro. Pre-election polls understated Bolsonaros support.

I wrote about the November 8 US midterm elections on September 30, at which Democratic gains have recently stalled. Meanwhile, UK Labour has seized a huge poll lead after a horror budget was delivered by the Conservatives on September 23.

Read more: US Democrats' gains stall six weeks before midterm elections; UK Labour seizes huge lead after budget

Dire polling has continued for the Conservatives: in eight UK national polls taken since October 5, Labour has led by 21 to 32 points.

Link:
Federal Labor's honeymoon continues in Resolve poll; can the Liberals regain office without those 'lefties'? - The Conversation

Bill Maher: Liberals shouldn’t ‘hate’ Pence, McConnell, Barr since they accepted Biden’s election victory – Fox News

"Real Time" host Bill Maher urged liberals to not "hate" the Republicans who, despite political differences, accepted President Biden's election victory.

During a panel discussion Friday night, Maher decried polling that shows a growing number of Americans, particularly young Americans, believe a civil war and political violence is acceptable and that some on both sides of the aisle believe it's "time to split" the country by party.

"I just want to know what this looks like how does that work?" Maher asked. "Is there gonna to be a line of cars from Arizona going into California? And the 4 million Trump voters that we have in California are going to be driving into Arizona? What does that mean, time to split?"

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie responded by saying he doesn't "buy" the seriousness of the polling, dismissing it as expressed "anger" by Americans.

BILL MAHER SUGGESTS BIDEN BUMP KAMALA HARRIS FROM DEM TICKET IN 2024: I JUST THINK SHES A BAD POLITICIAN'

Christie pointed to the aftermath of the January 6 riot where lawmakers "did their jobs" and proceeded to certify Biden's electoral count, which he stressed Biden "had" won the election, proving the strength of U.S. democracy, "not the other way around."

Former Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie speaks onstage during the 2019 Concordia Annual Summit at Grand Hyatt New York on Sept. 23, 2019 in New York City. (Photo by Riccardo Savi/Getty Images for Concordia Summit) (Riccardo Savi/Getty Images for Concordia Summit)

"You're in the minority of your party at least of the people who are running," Maher told the former governor. "Two hundred ninety-nine of the Republicans who are running [in the midterms] a majority they don't think the election was fair and Biden actually lost."

"We'll see how they do," Christie replied. "In the end, you gotta get out there and fight that."

BILL MAHER DEFENDS BIDEN FROM COMPLAINTS OF HIS AGE FOLLOWING WHERES JACKIE?' GAFFE

The HBO star then explained what he calls the "As Good As It Gets" Republicans, something he swore was a compliment to politicians like Christie.

"The people who just are adamant about how they won't even talk to Republicans," Maher said. "You want something that's not gonna be. Republicans see the world differently. It's OK. We have to have that. But this is as good as its gets Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, Kinzinger but even Bill Barr, and Pence, they both and Mitch McConnell have all said this was a legitimate election. That's as good as it gets, liberals, for Republicans. Deal with that! Don't hate those people."

"Real Time" host Bill Maher referred to politicians like Mike Pence, Mitch Mitch McConnell and Bill Barr as "As Good As It Gets" Republicans who accepted President Biden's election victory in 2020. (HBO/Getty Images)

During his closing monologue, Maher lambasted political "bubbles" forming across the country.

"I've gotta say, more than anything, this is what is wrong with this country. Our real division isn't between red and blue, it's between the people on both sides who aren't willing to mingle with Americans outside their political tribe so they have no idea what they're really like," Maher told his audience. "I asked a friend of mine recently if he wanted to come to a little party I was having and when he found out one of the guests had voted for Trump, he told me he wasn't coming because, I wouldnt breathe the same air.' OK, there's a word for people like this: a------s."

BILL MAHER TORN ON BIDEN'S ANTI-MAGA SPEECH: I LIKE THAT HE GAVE IT, BUT THE WAY HE DID IT? NOT GOOD

"When we confine ourselves to bubbles, alternative points of view become not just objectionable, they're unfavorable," Maher said while railing against GOP Arizona Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem, who alleged Biden didn't win his state because he personally never met a Biden voter. "Mark, have you ever been to a Whole Foods? Or talk to a woman under 50?"

"Real Time" host Bill Maher closed his show on Friday by railing against political "bubbles" that have formed across the country. (HBO) (HBO)

Maher slammed the idea of Americans choosing not to move to other parts of the country because they "wouldn't feel welcomed."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Would anyone ride the New York City subway wearing a MAGA hat?" Maher wondered. "Would anyone go to a NASCAR race in a Biden T-shirt while they chant, F--- Joe Biden?' That's where we are now where other parts of the country are seen as scary, no-go zones. America is like a prison now where the inmates think they need to join one of the gangs to survive and we dare not to walk on the wrong side of the yard."

Joseph A. Wulfsohn is a media reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to joseph.wulfsohn@fox.com and on Twitter: @JosephWulfsohn.

See the original post here:
Bill Maher: Liberals shouldn't 'hate' Pence, McConnell, Barr since they accepted Biden's election victory - Fox News

GOP governors bused migrants to liberal cities. Texas sent them to the vice president’s home – Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON

Politicians have been using migrants as props for decades. Republicans visit the Southwest border and declare that immigration is out of control. During the Trump administration, Democrats made their way to detention centers to decry the treatment of children locked in cages.

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas took the tactic to a new level Thursday, busing about 100 people including many who said they were fleeing violence or poverty to Vice President Kamala Harris doorstep. Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis sent a separate group of migrants to Marthas Vineyard, a playground for wealthy liberals, on Wednesday evening.

The two buses Abbott sent to Washington arrived outside the Naval Observatory just after sunrise. Reporters were on the scene before the humanitarian group that has been leading resettling efforts here since April, when Abbott and Arizonas Republican governor, Doug Ducey, started sending thousands of migrants to Washington and other liberal cities.

Amy Fischer, an organizer with the Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid Network, said she and other volunteers found out about the newest arrivals on Twitter. Her group is most often mobilized to help buses that arrive early in the morning or late at night at Union Station, the train and bus hub thats just a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol.

The migrants were welcomed and soon taken by Uber, Lyft and private volunteer cars to a church that the group has been using to help people bathe, eat and figure out where they plan to settle, whether in Washington or elsewhere. Fischer said her group has helped about 6,200 people so far.

This whole project is a racist publicity stunt that doesnt uphold the agency and human rights of those who are arriving to seek safety, Fischer said.

But it is forcing some Democratic leaders to adjust policy in order to process the unexpected arrivals. Washingtons Democratic mayor, Muriel Bowser, declared an emergency last week to free up $10 million in funds after the Pentagon rejected her requests for help from the National Guard.

We have a system that is failing those that are arriving to seek safety, Fischer added. And instead of states and localities and the federal government and Congress addressing the real needs, its turned into a game of political football.

President Biden asked Harris last year to address the root causes of migration from Central America. Republicans have referred to her as the Biden administrations border czar a title she has resisted and conservatives have pilloried her all week for declaring in an NBC News interview over the weekend that the border is secure.

Those remarks triggered Abbott to send the buses to Harriss home, he tweeted Thursday.

VP Harris claims our border is secure & denies the crisis, Abbott wrote. Were sending migrants to her backyard to call on the Biden Administration to do its job & secure the border.

Border agents recorded 1.9 million encounters with migrants between October 2021 and the end of July, an all-time high. This number doesnt represent individual migrants because many migrants try to cross the border and are apprehended multiple times.

The issue did not come up during a speech Harris delivered later in the morning at the White House event aimed at combating hate-filled violence and her office did not respond to emailed questions.

Gov. Gavin Newsom called for the Justice Department to investigate DeSantis actions, citing reports that migrants said they were recruited based on false representations that they would be taken to Boston and given expedited access to work authorization.

The fact that Fox News and not the Department of Homeland Security, the city or local NGOs were alerted about a plan to leave migrants, including children, on the side of a busy D.C. street makes clear that this is just a cruel, premeditated political stunt, said White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

Read the original:
GOP governors bused migrants to liberal cities. Texas sent them to the vice president's home - Los Angeles Times

So who’s ‘woke,’ what does it mean and how is it being used in Canadian politics? – CBC News

The word "woke" originally used to describe awareness of discrimination has been adopted by figures onthe political right to discredit policies and politicians they considertoo progressive, experts say.

The word was directedearlier this week at the Liberals and NDPbyConservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.And some Liberalshave been dancing around the term when asked about it by journalists.

"It's a term that's been evolving fast," said Jennifer Saul, a professor who specializes in the philosophy of political language at the University of Waterloo.

"For a while, there were people happily identifying themselves as woke. Itnow has been adopted as a term of abuse."

After Poilievre was elected to lead the Conservatives, a number of Liberal MPs told Radio-Canada that they want their party to shift to the centre to combat Poilievre's populist brand of conservatism.

"We need a government that is down to earth and less woke,"one MP, speaking on the condition they not be identified, told Radio-Canada.

Poilievre would later call the Liberals and the NDP who are supporting the government through a confidence-and supply-agreement a "radical woke coalition" in his first address to caucus as Conservativeleader.

Poilievre'suse of "woke" as a pejorativehad a number of Liberal cabinet ministers circling the word cautiouslyduring the party's caucus retreat earlier this week.

"Frankly, I don't even know what it means to be woke.I'm working to serve Canadians," said Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault.

"I certainly don't believe I'm woke, trust me, and no one in my family believes that either," said Innovation and Science Minister Franois-Philippe Champagne.

Even NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh didn't explicitly embrace the term when asked about it during an interview on CBC Radio's The House although he did sayhe doubts Poilievre understands what it means.

"I don't think that Mr. Poilievre knows what he means when he says that. I don't think he understands what he's saying when he just throws the words around," Singh told host Catherine Cullen in the interview airing Saturday.

"I think it's a baseless kind of position. It doesn't really add up to the reality," he said, adding that his party's focus is on getting help to Canadians.

The use of the term "woke" in a political context originates with black activists in the United States in the early- to mid-20th century, according to McGill political science professor Terri Givens.

Givens said it was used as a term of vigilance, calling for greater public awareness of racial discrimination. As a black woman growing up in the United States, she said, she was very familiar with the term.

"I've heard this term throughout my life," she said. "It's a term that means, 'We need to wake up to the fact that [discrimination is] happening to us.'"

Givens said that while the term has been used withinblack communitiesin North America for decades, it gained prominence in the wider public discourse during the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement.

Saul said that in the years following the rise of Black Lives Matter, people started applying the term more broadly toawareness of other social issues, such as sexism, poverty and the challenges facing LGBTQ people.

Both Saul and Givens said the term has since been seizedby right-wing figures to castigate people or policies they see as too progressive.

"This has become a blunt instrument of the right," Givens said.

Saul agrees but notes that "woke"has gained some negative meaning on the left as well. The term"woke-washing," he said, is used to describe the actions of people or organizations thattry to convince others theycare about certain issues.

Both Saul and Givens said Poilievre's use of the word to discredit the Liberals, and subsequent attempts by some Liberals to distance themselves from it,are notsurprising. The same things are happening inthe U.S. and Europe, they said.

"I think a defence of, 'Yes I'm woke and proud of it' is unlikely to succeed because the term 'woke' has become so thoroughly appropriated," Saul said.

Givens said she doesn't think the historical context of the term is understood by either the Liberals or the Conservatives.

"It really pains me to see politicians throwing these terms around [as] a quick soundbite, instead of having a nuanced conversation," she said.

Original post:
So who's 'woke,' what does it mean and how is it being used in Canadian politics? - CBC News