Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

A Major Vaping Lobby Group Donated $44K To The Liberals Last Year – Junkee

It is currently illegal to sell, possess or supply vapes without a prescription in Australia.

The Liberal Party received a total of $44,000 in donations from a major pro-vaping lobby group, amid ongoing disagreements about the legality of vaping in Australia.

Possession, supply or sale of nicotine vape products is illegal across Australia without a prescription, with a national ban coming into effect on October 1, 2021.

However, electoral records have since revealed that the Liberal Party received a total of $44,000 in personal donations from Legalise Vaping Australia director Brian Marlow last financial year before the ban came into effect.

According to the records, donations of $20,000, $15,000, $7,000 and $2,000 were given to the party declared as personal gifts from Marlow.Four Cornersreports the donations were made as part of a series of roundtable events but disclosure documents made no mention of Legalise Vaping Australia or vaping at all.

However, he later revealed toFour Cornersthat the donation was reportedly made on behalf of Legalise Vaping Australia as part of its fighting fund.

After the former health minister [Greg Hunt] announced a ban on the importation of vaping products, with two weeks notice and zero consultation, vape shops across the country donated over $100,000 to our organisation in less than a week, Marlow toldFour Corners.

Off the back of that, we held a series of vaping roundtable events to allow working-class vape shop employees and shop owners the chance to have long-form engagement with Members of Parliament.

Marlow has been a vocal supporter of vaping, who called last years prescription model a slap in the face to vapers.

Look, I think its a slap in the face to over 500,000 vapers across the country, these people who have quit smoking and finally done the right thing in getting away from cigarettes and yet somehow were making it harder for them to access these products that we know are less harmful, Marlow told 9 News last year.

I do think the prescription model will drive people back to smoking.

Weve surveyed over 7000 vapers across the country and almost half of them said once the prescription model comes into place theyll probably go back to smoking.

Marlows theory directly contradicts the findings of a report released byProfessor of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Australian National UniversityEmily Banks earlier this year.

When were talking about addiction in children, e-cigarettes may actually be more dangerous than smoking because theyre much easier to access, theyre much more discreet, you can hide them, and they also have these multiple flavours so theyre much more appealing to children, and theyre marketed to children, Banks told the ABC.

Use of e-cigarettes in that younger age group isnt about giving up smoking. Its about a completely new habit.

Marlow is also friends with Liberal Senator Hollie Hughes who personally describes herself as a vaping enthusiast and opposed the plan to ban the personal importation of nicotine without a prescription.

Hughes is one of 28 Coalition backbenchers who vocally opposed the ban, along with Senator Matt Canavan.

Australias vaping ban has repeatedly been criticised, largely for the fact that it has failed to actually stop people from vaping instead, developing a black market for the products.

But regardless of your feelings on the ban itself, it feels particularly weird to have the government that sent the market underground accepting donations from lobby groups promoting the products.

Read the original here:
A Major Vaping Lobby Group Donated $44K To The Liberals Last Year - Junkee

Rep. Kat Cammack: Limousine Liberals Are Following The Political Science When It Comes To Abortion – FOX News Radio

Florida Republican Congresswoman Kat Cammack joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to shed light on how the Democratic Partys position on abortion does not align with the way most people in the U.S. feel about this issue.

Only 17 percent of voters believe that abortion should be allowed at any time during a pregnancy. And you hear Biden today stand behind a podium after having waffled on this issue during his 40 year career, and he says this is not in line and in step with what the American people want. No, thats thats clearly the opposite. Because we know that only 17 percent of voters nationally believe abortion should be allowed at any time. So he calls on Congress to codify into law that a woman can get an abortion at any point, an abortion on demand. In fact, this Judy Chu bill that we had voted on in the House not too long ago, that is now dead on arrival in the Senate, it says that a woman, up until the day before delivery can murder her child. And its murder, because we know that that child has a heartbeat, an independent and unique DNA that is separate from the mother. It is completely capable of feeling pain and sensitivity to light and movement, and its its own person. And for them to reject the science again just point to another reason, another example of how the limousine liberals who hide behind their armored cars and their gated mansions are not following the science. Theyre following the political science.

Rep. Cammack also explains why the Supreme Courts landmark ruling that has overturned Roe V. Wade is a victory on many levels. To hear what else she had to say, listen to the podcast!

See the original post here:
Rep. Kat Cammack: Limousine Liberals Are Following The Political Science When It Comes To Abortion - FOX News Radio

Final 2022 election results: Coalition routed in cities and in Western Australia can they recover in 2025? – The Conversation Indonesia

At the May 21 federal election, Labor won 77 of the 151 House of Representatives seats (up eight since 2019 when adjusted for redistributions), the Coalition won 58 seats (down 18), the Greens four (up three) and all Others 12 (up seven). This was a Labor majority of three.

The 2019 election result was Coalition 77 seats and Labor 68, but the ABC adjusted for Labor gaining a seat from the Coalition from redistributions. Craig Kellys defection from the Coalition to the UAP was not factored in, so Hughes was not a gain for the Coalition.

Primary votes were 35.7% Coalition (down 5.7%), 32.6% Labor (down 0.8%), 12.2% Greens (up 1.8%), 5.0% One Nation (up 1.9%), 4.1% UAP (up 0.7%), 5.3% independents (up 1.9%) and 5.1% others (up 0.2%).

Despite losing the primary vote by 3.1%, Labor won the national two party count by a 52.1-47.9 margin, a 3.7% swing to Labor. This is obtained by recounting all seats that did not finish as Labor vs Coalition contests between those parties to ascertain the preference between Labor and Coalition of all of Australias voters.

With the combined major party primary votes down to just over 68%, and 16 seats won by crossbenchers, some would argue that the two party vote is not relevant anymore. I think it is still relevant as a basic measure of whether more Australians preferred a Labor government or a Coalition one, and of how left or right-leaning seats and states were at the election.

The table below shows the number of seats for each state and nationally, the number of Labor seats, the percentage of Labor seats, the number of net Labor gains, the Labor two party percentage, the two party swing to Labor, the number of Other seats (this includes Greens), the number of Other gains and the number of Coalition seats.

The two party swing to Labor in Western Australia was a massive 10.6%, far larger than in any other state.

All Labor, Greens and independent gains occurred in Australias five mainland capital cities, and the large majority were in inner city seats. In regional seats, there were swings to the Coalition in Lyons, Gilmore and Lingiari, which made these seats close holds for Labor.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has a table of two party swings by seat demographic. Negative swings are to Labor, positive to the Coalition. This table has a 5.6% two party swing to Labor in inner metro seats, 3.6% in outer metro, 2.5% in provincial and 2.3% in rural seats.

In Queensland, there was a particularly marked difference between inner metro (an 8.7% two party swing to Labor) and other seat categories (between a 3.1% and 4.4% swing).

Analyst Ben Raue has charts of the difference between each seat demographic and the national two party vote since 1993. He says the inner metro difference in Labors favour is the highest ever in these charts, while the difference between rural seats and nationally is the highest in the Coalitions favour.

Before the election, I anticipated that the best swings to Labor would occur in the cities. Australian cities with over 100,000 population have 68% of our overall population. Winning rural seats isnt good enough for the Coalition in Australia.

Read more: Will a continuing education divide eventually favour Labor electorally due to our big cities?

People with a higher level of educational attainment tend to live in inner metro seats, and they have swung towards the left in recent elections in Australia, the US and the UK. Concerns about climate change and social issues were likely important factors in inner metro seats.

In NSW, Labor gained Robertson, Bennelong and Reid from the Liberals, but lost Fowler to an independent. Independents also gained Wentworth, North Sydney and Mackellar from the Liberals. The regional seat of Gilmore was held by Labor by just a 0.2% margin against the Liberals.

In Victoria, Labor gained Chisholm and Higgins from the Liberals, and independents gained Goldstein and Kooyong. The Liberals held Deakin by just a 0.2% margin and Menzies by 0.7% against Labor.

In Queensland, the Greens gained Griffith from Labor and Ryan and Brisbane from the LNP. Outside Brisbane, Labor had swings in its favour, but did not gain any seats. While Labor recovered ground from 2019s shellacking in regional Queensland, it wasnt enough to gain seats.

In WA, Labor gained Swan, Pearce, Hasluck and Tangney from the Liberals and an independent gained Curtin. The Liberals held Moore by 0.7% against Labor. Labor has WA to thank for its House majority.

The WA Senate result was crucial in giving Labor a friendly Senate, with Labor winning three of the six up for election, to two Liberals and one Green, a gain for Labor from the Liberals.

Read more: Final Senate results: Labor, the Greens and David Pocock will have a majority of senators

In SA, Labor gained Boothby from the Liberals, with the Liberals holding Sturt by 0.5% against Labor.

Tasmania was the only state to record a two party swing to the Coalition. The Liberals had swings in their favour in the regional seats of Bass, Braddon and Lyons, easily retaining the first two after gaining them in 2019, and coming close to gaining Lyons, which Labor held by 0.9%.

In the ACT, Labor easily retained its three seats, while independent David Pocock defeated Liberal Zed Seselja in the Senate. Pocock was helped by Labors 67.0-33.0 two party win in the ACT, a 5.3% swing to Labor.

Read more: ACT Senate result: Pocock defeats Liberals in first time Liberals have not won one ACT Senate seat

In the NT, Labor easily retained the Darwin-based Solomon with a swing in its favour, but came close to losing the regional Lingiari, holding by 1.0% against the Country Liberals.

The AEC has a sortable table of two party results for each seat. Ignoring crossbenchers, Labor won the two party count in 84 of the 151 seats, to 67 for the Coalition. Labor won this measure in its own 77 seats, the four Greens seats, Clark, Fowler and Mayo.

None of the seats gained by teal independents at this election flipped from a Coalition win to a Labor win on two party votes. Labor gained a two party majority in Brisbane, Ryan and Mayo; the first two were gained by the Greens and the last is held by Centre Alliances Rebekha Sharkie.

Labors best seats against the Coalition were the six seats that were Labor vs Greens contests: Cooper, Wills, Melbourne, Sydney, Grayndler and Canberra.

When Greens and other votes in these seats were counted between Labor and the Coalition, these six seats gave Labor between 72 and 79% against the Coalition. The best two party share in a traditional Labor vs Coalition contest for Labor was in Newcastle (68.0%).

With WA recording a much bigger swing to Labor than any other state, its not surprising that WA seats made up the top seven two party swings to Labor.

Greens leader Adam Bandts seat of Melbourne was the top non-WA swing to Labor at 10.1%. In 2019, Labors Melbourne candidate was disendorsed after nominations closed, and this affected Greens preference flows.

The largest swing to the Coalition was in Fowler (8.3% swing). This was the seat Kristina Keneally lost to an independent. Other western Sydney seats, such as Blaxland, Chifley, McMahon and Watson, swung slightly to Labor, so this was a candidate effect against Keneally.

There were six other seats which swung more than 4% to the Coalition: in ascending order, they are Lyons, Gorton, Lingiari, Braddon, Scullin and Calwell. Gorton, Scullin and Calwell are safe Labor seats in Melbourne, and it appears there was a backlash from the Victorian Labor governments COVID lockdowns.

The other three are regional seats in Tasmania and the NT. In my election maps article before the election, I said Labor could struggle to regain the Tasmanian seats of Braddon and Bass.

Read more: Where are the most marginal seats, and who might win them?

Once elected, independents and other parties who win seats in Australia are difficult to dislodge. For example, independent Andrew Wilkie won Clark (then named Denison) from third on primary votes in 2010, but has retained it easily at subsequent elections.

Furthermore, while the Coalition won the two party count in all the seats won by teal independents, these seats all swung to Labor by between 1% and 10%. The lowest two party swing to Labor in a teal seat was Warringah, where Tony Abbott had deflated the Liberal vote in 2019. If the trend to the left in inner cities continues, it will be difficult for the Coalition to regain these seats.

While the Coalition came close to gaining three regional seats from Labor Gilmore, Lyons and Lingiari there are not enough regional seats in Australia for the Coalition to compensate for the losses of city seats.

If the Coalition is to win the next election, they will probably need to regain support in outer metro seats. I believe that in these seats the economy is of paramount importance. At this election, people in outer metro seats probably swung to Labor owing to concerns about inflation.

Economic conditions at the next federal election are likely to be crucial in determining how outer metro seats vote. So if the economy is lousy in three years, the Coalition will probably return to power.

With the massive swing to Labor in WA at this election, the Liberals will be hoping it returns to its normal place as a strongly pro-Coalition state at the next election. But while the WA swing was enhanced by COVID factors, Perth has around 80% of WAs overall population.

If the Liberals continue to struggle in cities, WA is likely to be more difficult than it may first appear for the Liberals to win back. Tasmanias three northern seats are likely to be easier for the Liberals to win and hold, but Tasmania only has five seats while WA has 15.

With declining vote share for the major parties, it is becoming more difficult for one of them to win a majority even with our single-member system for the House. Labor has angered both House and Senate crossbenchers with its proposals to cut the number of parliamentary staff each crossbencher is entitled to from four to one.

While Labor does not need the crossbench for a House majority in this term, they could easily need more support in the future, And Labor needs at least one non-Greens crossbencher in the Senate to pass legislation opposed by the Coalition in this term. The proposed reduction is stupid politics.

Read more:
Final 2022 election results: Coalition routed in cities and in Western Australia can they recover in 2025? - The Conversation Indonesia

Liberals’ ‘more inflation’ plan delivers highest inflation in nearly 40 years – Conservative Party of Canada

Ottawa, ON Dan Albas, Conservative Shadow Minister for Finance, and Grard Deltell, Conservative Shadow Minister for Innovation, Science and Industry released the following statement after Statistics Canada warned inflation has reached 7.7 per cent:

Less than a week after the Deputy Prime Minister presented her so-called solution to the inflationary crisis, the problem is only getting worse with prices climbing by 7.7 per cent the highest increase in nearly four decades.

The inflation-driven cost-of-living crisis caused by Justin Trudeaus reckless spending is making life harder for Canadians. Canadians are struggling to feed their families, with food prices jumping by 9.7 per cent in the last year. Theyre struggling to afford the roof over their heads, with rents continuing to climb and the price of a home increasing by 20 per cent this year. Theyre struggling to fill up their cars, with prices over $2.00/litre and the Liberals refusing to provide any relief.

Yet, the Trudeau Liberals continue to blame global factors and refuse to provide the immediate relief Canadians are begging for, and vote against common-sense Conservative solutions that would leave more money in the pockets of Canadians.

Enough is enough. Canadians cant afford a government that continues to leave them behind.

Conservatives will continue to be the voice of Canadians looking for relief from the cost-of-living crisis. While Justin Trudeau continues to offer hollow words and empty promises, Conservatives will continue to fight for solutions that leave more money in the pockets of Canadians and protect the value of the money that they earn.

See the original post:
Liberals' 'more inflation' plan delivers highest inflation in nearly 40 years - Conservative Party of Canada

More bureaucracy is not the answer to Liberal failures – Conservative Party of Canada

Ottawa, ON Laila Goodridge, Conservative Shadow Minister for Families, Children and Social Development, Jasraj Singh Hallan, Conservative Shadow Minister for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, and Luc Berthold, Deputy Leader of the Official Opposition and Qubec Political Lieutenant, issued the following statement regarding the announcement of a Cabinet task force to address inexcusable delays in delivering government services:

Over the weekend, the Prime Minister announced the creation of a cabinet committee, which includes some of the Liberals worst-performing ministers, to address the inexcusable failure of the Liberal government to deliver basic services like passport renewals and immigration services.

More bureaucracy, more meetings, and more poorly performing Liberal ministers are not what is needed to address this crisis. Unfortunately, the Liberal government ignored the warning signs and failed to plan for the country emerging from the pandemic. The least they can do now is take meaningful steps to resolve the chaos they created.

The Minister of Transport blames out-of-practice Canadians for delays at the airport, instead of acknowledging outdated mandates. The Minister of Families, Children and Social Development blames unprecedented demand for passports, despite the number falling below pre-pandemic demand. The Minister of Immigration blames anything except his own department for a record-breaking backlog at IRCC. Now they believe the solution to this chaos is to add another layer of government bureaucracy.

Rather than focusing on resolving the crisis, hard-working public servants will now need to divert their attention to help a task force of Liberal ministers study the problem. Canadians need front-line workers processing applications and working through the backlog, not a summer research project for Liberal ministers.

Conservatives have repeatedly called on the Trudeau government for more action to address passport delays and immigration backlogs at IRCC. The problem has gotten so bad, that some Canadians are travelling between provinces just to get a passport. Announcing one more task force is sadly a predictable response from this government.

Canadians deserve timely and reliable access to government services. Once again, the Trudeau government delivers more empty promises while Canadians are left waiting for actual action.

See the original post here:
More bureaucracy is not the answer to Liberal failures - Conservative Party of Canada