Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

Liberals will go to any length to destroy Trump – Wyoming Tribune

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

View original post here:
Liberals will go to any length to destroy Trump - Wyoming Tribune

Liberal Party looks for love in all the wrong places in the aftermath of the May federal election – The Australian Financial Review

Cormann was not just a powerful finance minister. In his home base, he worked closely with two conservative factional allies in the state upper house leaders of the group known as the clan to increasingly control local branches and pre-selections. Key to that was the recruitment of socially conservative Christians as members.

McGowan couldnt have asked for better political opponents in targeting the Liberal Party for being out of touch with the electorate, A series of leaked WhatsApp messages last year demonstrated both the clans impact and the crudeness of its tactics. Cormann may have departed for a more sophisticated life, but his local lieutenants remain in place.

Liberal Party woes in the west are just the most dramatic demonstration of a state-by-state decline evident across most of Australia.

Many moderate party members or supporters including senior business figures who used to back the popular Julie Bishop in the seat of Curtin are by now totally alienated from the party. That has obvious results for the evaporation of their previous financial support. One obvious result is yet another loss of what used to be a blue ribbon seat to a new teal MP, Kate Chaney, as well as far more limited fund-raising prospects in future.

In what used to be a Coalition powerhouse state, there is no clear route back. Ahead of the May election, for example, the Coalition held 11 of 16 seats. That was before the states swing against the Morrison government rocketed to over 10 per cent on a two party preferred basis nearly three times the national average.

As well as Curtin, Liberals were shocked to lose another four WA seats far more than the two, maximum three, they expected. Combined with a former Liberal seat being abolished, it has reduced the Liberals to five out of 15. At the same time, Labor has converted previously marginal Labor seats like Cowan into much safer harbours for the Albanese government next time.

But Liberal Party woes in the west are just the most dramatic demonstration of a state-by-state decline evident across most of Australia. With the loss of the Marshall government in South Australia in March, only Tasmania and NSW remain in Liberal hands.

True, the continuing implosion of the Tasmanian Labor Party gives new Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff lots of leeway, with the federal Liberal Party also keeping its two lower house seats last month. But this is a rare and modestly sized show of electoral stability among Liberal state divisions.

NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet certainly faces a tough re-election in March, as well as the need to manage bitter factional dysfunction in the party. The factional games inexcusably paralysed pre-selections in several crucial NSW federal seats for months. At a state level, the government is determined to present a different direction and image to either Scott Morrison or Peter Dutton.

NSW Treasurer Matt Keans budget last week is designed to show a progressive government able to lead on issues such as renewable energy and increased opportunities for women. But that task is much harder due to self-inflicted wounds, such as appointing the former state Nationals leader, John Barilaro, to a plum trade post in New York while also facing a moderate, appealing NSW opposition leader, Chris Minns, in the mould of South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas.

In Victoria, Daniel Andrews retains absolute control over his party and the governments public messaging. He will use the resignation of several of his key ministers on Friday to sell the image of new dynamism and a future agenda under new ministers in what is now an old government.

His task is made much easier by the fact so few Victorians would be able to even name the Liberal leader, let alone understand what Matthew Guy stands for other than being the anti-Dan candidate. And with the defeat of Josh Frydenberg, the partys most prominent and popular leader and its most effective fund-raiser is also lost.

Its true that in Queensland, Labor failed to make up any ground, even losing an inner-city seat to the Greens while the Liberal National Party lost two.

With the backing of the Nationals, Dutton as opposition leader retains his appeal in much of regional Queensland and Labor holds only five of 30 seats. But despite growing disillusion with Annastacia Palaszczuk, theres no evidence Queensland voters are interested in any return of a state LNP government. Nor that Dutton will be able to extend his Queensland grip further south.

His focus on instead winning more of the Labor heartland and tradies and small business in middle and outer suburbia across Australia is widely disparaged by his few remaining, and many former, moderate colleagues.

They insist the Liberal Party cant revive any broad appeal by giving up on wealthier suburban seats and the middle ground that used to sustain it.

But whos listening?

Read the original post:
Liberal Party looks for love in all the wrong places in the aftermath of the May federal election - The Australian Financial Review

A Major Vaping Lobby Group Donated $44K To The Liberals Last Year – Junkee

It is currently illegal to sell, possess or supply vapes without a prescription in Australia.

The Liberal Party received a total of $44,000 in donations from a major pro-vaping lobby group, amid ongoing disagreements about the legality of vaping in Australia.

Possession, supply or sale of nicotine vape products is illegal across Australia without a prescription, with a national ban coming into effect on October 1, 2021.

However, electoral records have since revealed that the Liberal Party received a total of $44,000 in personal donations from Legalise Vaping Australia director Brian Marlow last financial year before the ban came into effect.

According to the records, donations of $20,000, $15,000, $7,000 and $2,000 were given to the party declared as personal gifts from Marlow.Four Cornersreports the donations were made as part of a series of roundtable events but disclosure documents made no mention of Legalise Vaping Australia or vaping at all.

However, he later revealed toFour Cornersthat the donation was reportedly made on behalf of Legalise Vaping Australia as part of its fighting fund.

After the former health minister [Greg Hunt] announced a ban on the importation of vaping products, with two weeks notice and zero consultation, vape shops across the country donated over $100,000 to our organisation in less than a week, Marlow toldFour Corners.

Off the back of that, we held a series of vaping roundtable events to allow working-class vape shop employees and shop owners the chance to have long-form engagement with Members of Parliament.

Marlow has been a vocal supporter of vaping, who called last years prescription model a slap in the face to vapers.

Look, I think its a slap in the face to over 500,000 vapers across the country, these people who have quit smoking and finally done the right thing in getting away from cigarettes and yet somehow were making it harder for them to access these products that we know are less harmful, Marlow told 9 News last year.

I do think the prescription model will drive people back to smoking.

Weve surveyed over 7000 vapers across the country and almost half of them said once the prescription model comes into place theyll probably go back to smoking.

Marlows theory directly contradicts the findings of a report released byProfessor of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Australian National UniversityEmily Banks earlier this year.

When were talking about addiction in children, e-cigarettes may actually be more dangerous than smoking because theyre much easier to access, theyre much more discreet, you can hide them, and they also have these multiple flavours so theyre much more appealing to children, and theyre marketed to children, Banks told the ABC.

Use of e-cigarettes in that younger age group isnt about giving up smoking. Its about a completely new habit.

Marlow is also friends with Liberal Senator Hollie Hughes who personally describes herself as a vaping enthusiast and opposed the plan to ban the personal importation of nicotine without a prescription.

Hughes is one of 28 Coalition backbenchers who vocally opposed the ban, along with Senator Matt Canavan.

Australias vaping ban has repeatedly been criticised, largely for the fact that it has failed to actually stop people from vaping instead, developing a black market for the products.

But regardless of your feelings on the ban itself, it feels particularly weird to have the government that sent the market underground accepting donations from lobby groups promoting the products.

Read the original here:
A Major Vaping Lobby Group Donated $44K To The Liberals Last Year - Junkee

Rep. Kat Cammack: Limousine Liberals Are Following The Political Science When It Comes To Abortion – FOX News Radio

Florida Republican Congresswoman Kat Cammack joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to shed light on how the Democratic Partys position on abortion does not align with the way most people in the U.S. feel about this issue.

Only 17 percent of voters believe that abortion should be allowed at any time during a pregnancy. And you hear Biden today stand behind a podium after having waffled on this issue during his 40 year career, and he says this is not in line and in step with what the American people want. No, thats thats clearly the opposite. Because we know that only 17 percent of voters nationally believe abortion should be allowed at any time. So he calls on Congress to codify into law that a woman can get an abortion at any point, an abortion on demand. In fact, this Judy Chu bill that we had voted on in the House not too long ago, that is now dead on arrival in the Senate, it says that a woman, up until the day before delivery can murder her child. And its murder, because we know that that child has a heartbeat, an independent and unique DNA that is separate from the mother. It is completely capable of feeling pain and sensitivity to light and movement, and its its own person. And for them to reject the science again just point to another reason, another example of how the limousine liberals who hide behind their armored cars and their gated mansions are not following the science. Theyre following the political science.

Rep. Cammack also explains why the Supreme Courts landmark ruling that has overturned Roe V. Wade is a victory on many levels. To hear what else she had to say, listen to the podcast!

See the original post here:
Rep. Kat Cammack: Limousine Liberals Are Following The Political Science When It Comes To Abortion - FOX News Radio

Final 2022 election results: Coalition routed in cities and in Western Australia can they recover in 2025? – The Conversation Indonesia

At the May 21 federal election, Labor won 77 of the 151 House of Representatives seats (up eight since 2019 when adjusted for redistributions), the Coalition won 58 seats (down 18), the Greens four (up three) and all Others 12 (up seven). This was a Labor majority of three.

The 2019 election result was Coalition 77 seats and Labor 68, but the ABC adjusted for Labor gaining a seat from the Coalition from redistributions. Craig Kellys defection from the Coalition to the UAP was not factored in, so Hughes was not a gain for the Coalition.

Primary votes were 35.7% Coalition (down 5.7%), 32.6% Labor (down 0.8%), 12.2% Greens (up 1.8%), 5.0% One Nation (up 1.9%), 4.1% UAP (up 0.7%), 5.3% independents (up 1.9%) and 5.1% others (up 0.2%).

Despite losing the primary vote by 3.1%, Labor won the national two party count by a 52.1-47.9 margin, a 3.7% swing to Labor. This is obtained by recounting all seats that did not finish as Labor vs Coalition contests between those parties to ascertain the preference between Labor and Coalition of all of Australias voters.

With the combined major party primary votes down to just over 68%, and 16 seats won by crossbenchers, some would argue that the two party vote is not relevant anymore. I think it is still relevant as a basic measure of whether more Australians preferred a Labor government or a Coalition one, and of how left or right-leaning seats and states were at the election.

The table below shows the number of seats for each state and nationally, the number of Labor seats, the percentage of Labor seats, the number of net Labor gains, the Labor two party percentage, the two party swing to Labor, the number of Other seats (this includes Greens), the number of Other gains and the number of Coalition seats.

The two party swing to Labor in Western Australia was a massive 10.6%, far larger than in any other state.

All Labor, Greens and independent gains occurred in Australias five mainland capital cities, and the large majority were in inner city seats. In regional seats, there were swings to the Coalition in Lyons, Gilmore and Lingiari, which made these seats close holds for Labor.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has a table of two party swings by seat demographic. Negative swings are to Labor, positive to the Coalition. This table has a 5.6% two party swing to Labor in inner metro seats, 3.6% in outer metro, 2.5% in provincial and 2.3% in rural seats.

In Queensland, there was a particularly marked difference between inner metro (an 8.7% two party swing to Labor) and other seat categories (between a 3.1% and 4.4% swing).

Analyst Ben Raue has charts of the difference between each seat demographic and the national two party vote since 1993. He says the inner metro difference in Labors favour is the highest ever in these charts, while the difference between rural seats and nationally is the highest in the Coalitions favour.

Before the election, I anticipated that the best swings to Labor would occur in the cities. Australian cities with over 100,000 population have 68% of our overall population. Winning rural seats isnt good enough for the Coalition in Australia.

Read more: Will a continuing education divide eventually favour Labor electorally due to our big cities?

People with a higher level of educational attainment tend to live in inner metro seats, and they have swung towards the left in recent elections in Australia, the US and the UK. Concerns about climate change and social issues were likely important factors in inner metro seats.

In NSW, Labor gained Robertson, Bennelong and Reid from the Liberals, but lost Fowler to an independent. Independents also gained Wentworth, North Sydney and Mackellar from the Liberals. The regional seat of Gilmore was held by Labor by just a 0.2% margin against the Liberals.

In Victoria, Labor gained Chisholm and Higgins from the Liberals, and independents gained Goldstein and Kooyong. The Liberals held Deakin by just a 0.2% margin and Menzies by 0.7% against Labor.

In Queensland, the Greens gained Griffith from Labor and Ryan and Brisbane from the LNP. Outside Brisbane, Labor had swings in its favour, but did not gain any seats. While Labor recovered ground from 2019s shellacking in regional Queensland, it wasnt enough to gain seats.

In WA, Labor gained Swan, Pearce, Hasluck and Tangney from the Liberals and an independent gained Curtin. The Liberals held Moore by 0.7% against Labor. Labor has WA to thank for its House majority.

The WA Senate result was crucial in giving Labor a friendly Senate, with Labor winning three of the six up for election, to two Liberals and one Green, a gain for Labor from the Liberals.

Read more: Final Senate results: Labor, the Greens and David Pocock will have a majority of senators

In SA, Labor gained Boothby from the Liberals, with the Liberals holding Sturt by 0.5% against Labor.

Tasmania was the only state to record a two party swing to the Coalition. The Liberals had swings in their favour in the regional seats of Bass, Braddon and Lyons, easily retaining the first two after gaining them in 2019, and coming close to gaining Lyons, which Labor held by 0.9%.

In the ACT, Labor easily retained its three seats, while independent David Pocock defeated Liberal Zed Seselja in the Senate. Pocock was helped by Labors 67.0-33.0 two party win in the ACT, a 5.3% swing to Labor.

Read more: ACT Senate result: Pocock defeats Liberals in first time Liberals have not won one ACT Senate seat

In the NT, Labor easily retained the Darwin-based Solomon with a swing in its favour, but came close to losing the regional Lingiari, holding by 1.0% against the Country Liberals.

The AEC has a sortable table of two party results for each seat. Ignoring crossbenchers, Labor won the two party count in 84 of the 151 seats, to 67 for the Coalition. Labor won this measure in its own 77 seats, the four Greens seats, Clark, Fowler and Mayo.

None of the seats gained by teal independents at this election flipped from a Coalition win to a Labor win on two party votes. Labor gained a two party majority in Brisbane, Ryan and Mayo; the first two were gained by the Greens and the last is held by Centre Alliances Rebekha Sharkie.

Labors best seats against the Coalition were the six seats that were Labor vs Greens contests: Cooper, Wills, Melbourne, Sydney, Grayndler and Canberra.

When Greens and other votes in these seats were counted between Labor and the Coalition, these six seats gave Labor between 72 and 79% against the Coalition. The best two party share in a traditional Labor vs Coalition contest for Labor was in Newcastle (68.0%).

With WA recording a much bigger swing to Labor than any other state, its not surprising that WA seats made up the top seven two party swings to Labor.

Greens leader Adam Bandts seat of Melbourne was the top non-WA swing to Labor at 10.1%. In 2019, Labors Melbourne candidate was disendorsed after nominations closed, and this affected Greens preference flows.

The largest swing to the Coalition was in Fowler (8.3% swing). This was the seat Kristina Keneally lost to an independent. Other western Sydney seats, such as Blaxland, Chifley, McMahon and Watson, swung slightly to Labor, so this was a candidate effect against Keneally.

There were six other seats which swung more than 4% to the Coalition: in ascending order, they are Lyons, Gorton, Lingiari, Braddon, Scullin and Calwell. Gorton, Scullin and Calwell are safe Labor seats in Melbourne, and it appears there was a backlash from the Victorian Labor governments COVID lockdowns.

The other three are regional seats in Tasmania and the NT. In my election maps article before the election, I said Labor could struggle to regain the Tasmanian seats of Braddon and Bass.

Read more: Where are the most marginal seats, and who might win them?

Once elected, independents and other parties who win seats in Australia are difficult to dislodge. For example, independent Andrew Wilkie won Clark (then named Denison) from third on primary votes in 2010, but has retained it easily at subsequent elections.

Furthermore, while the Coalition won the two party count in all the seats won by teal independents, these seats all swung to Labor by between 1% and 10%. The lowest two party swing to Labor in a teal seat was Warringah, where Tony Abbott had deflated the Liberal vote in 2019. If the trend to the left in inner cities continues, it will be difficult for the Coalition to regain these seats.

While the Coalition came close to gaining three regional seats from Labor Gilmore, Lyons and Lingiari there are not enough regional seats in Australia for the Coalition to compensate for the losses of city seats.

If the Coalition is to win the next election, they will probably need to regain support in outer metro seats. I believe that in these seats the economy is of paramount importance. At this election, people in outer metro seats probably swung to Labor owing to concerns about inflation.

Economic conditions at the next federal election are likely to be crucial in determining how outer metro seats vote. So if the economy is lousy in three years, the Coalition will probably return to power.

With the massive swing to Labor in WA at this election, the Liberals will be hoping it returns to its normal place as a strongly pro-Coalition state at the next election. But while the WA swing was enhanced by COVID factors, Perth has around 80% of WAs overall population.

If the Liberals continue to struggle in cities, WA is likely to be more difficult than it may first appear for the Liberals to win back. Tasmanias three northern seats are likely to be easier for the Liberals to win and hold, but Tasmania only has five seats while WA has 15.

With declining vote share for the major parties, it is becoming more difficult for one of them to win a majority even with our single-member system for the House. Labor has angered both House and Senate crossbenchers with its proposals to cut the number of parliamentary staff each crossbencher is entitled to from four to one.

While Labor does not need the crossbench for a House majority in this term, they could easily need more support in the future, And Labor needs at least one non-Greens crossbencher in the Senate to pass legislation opposed by the Coalition in this term. The proposed reduction is stupid politics.

Read more:
Final 2022 election results: Coalition routed in cities and in Western Australia can they recover in 2025? - The Conversation Indonesia