Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

Liberals and custodians of free speech come together to justify attack on Arnab Goswami and his wife by Congress goons – OpIndia

Republic TVs Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami was attacked by two bike-borne assailants little after midnight on 23 April, 2020 near his residence in Mumbai. Soon after, he released a video wherein he said that the two men belonged to Yuva Congress and had attacked him to teach him a lesson after he had questioned Congress President Sonia Gandhis silence on Palghar sadhu lynching.

However, soon after the attack on Goswami, the liberals and the defendants of freedom of press implicitly justified and defended the attacks on Goswami.

Taseers Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card was recently revoked as he had concealed that his father was a Pakistani citizen. He has regularly displayed Hinduphobia and spoken the same language of the Islamists who killed his father in Pakistan.

- article continues after ad -- article resumes -

NDTV journalist Nidhi Razdan slyly referred to Goswami as the pandemic India is facing.

Meanwhile, Congress supporters on social media have started trending DramaBandKarArnab hashtag.

Earlier, Lamba had hailed Yuva Congress after Goswami released a video stating that the two men who had attacked him were Yuva Congress workers.

In the intervening night of 22nd and 23rd April, after his regular edit call post the 10 PM debate, Arnab Goswami and his wife were driving back home when two bike-borne assailants attacked their car. According to our sources, the assailants parked their bike in front of Arnab Goswamis car in order to get him to stop the car and then attacked it. Arnab Goswami and his wife have escaped unhurt. The assailants, after attacking the car and trying to break the windows, also threw ink at the car. According to Republic TV, the goons confessed that they were from Congress and the attack took place only 500 meters away from Goswamis residence, according to Republic TV.

Read more from the original source:
Liberals and custodians of free speech come together to justify attack on Arnab Goswami and his wife by Congress goons - OpIndia

Some Liberals Are Warming Up To The Idea Of Hindu Rashtra Over Nehruvian Secularism, Whats The Catch? – Swarajya

An article in the Indian Express, written by the Vice-Chancellor of NALSAR University, Hyderabad, Faizan Mustafa states that the Indian minorities are too fed up of the facade of secularism.

Mustafa argues that if Indians are done with the Nehruvian model of secularism (without pointing out its flaws), they should declare the country a Hindu rashtra, giving Hinduism the status of the dominant spiritual heritage.

He is right in saying that the Hindu rashtra will not be entirely different from the current secular state, because it is not in Hinduisms character to do what Pakistan or other Islamic countries do to religious minorities.

We also agree with him that a Hindu rashtra must bring with it genuine liberalism.

However, there is a catch, and those who are not well-prepared, will be left bewildered by Mustafas proposal.

One, its an ultimatum to intellectuals to work hard to save the Left-Islamist marriage

The proposal is a warning to the Left compatriots that unless they get a grip of the narrative and strike the enemy harder, the regressive Left-Islamist marriage is in trouble.

It signals that the Muslims intellectuals are keeping the option open, instead, to negotiate with more benign right-wing elements.

Two, it is a veiled threat imperial forces are too powerful to be pushed out of the game

The message is that we can change things on paper as much as we want, but the functioning of the Christian and Islamic imperial structures in India will remain intact.

The reason simply is that they already function with minimal dependence on other communities or indigenous political, social and economic structures. In a globalised world, they hold an organisational, political and financial clout that the Hindus can hardly match.

It is important to recognise that these imperial forces have a utilitarian approach towards the Left.

Indian Left exists thanks to the the alliance with imperial forces, not the other way around.

Left is quite expendable for the imperialists. Its only utility comes from the hegemony in the intellectual ecosystem.

If that comes under threat, the imperial forces can also directly negotiate with the non-Left forces to come to a new arrangement where they are, as before, left alone to work, just, say, at a higher price.

Even the political parties vilified as saffron have shown eagerness to maintain a functioning partnership with the Christian and Islamic supremacist forces.

The tallest Christian cross coming up in Mizoram, illegal church construction on Sattra land in Majuli, Assam, the Tablighi Jamaat-Covid-19 fiasco, and the (lack of) reaction to the recent mob lynching of two saffron-clad sadhus in the Christian missionary hotbed Palghar, Maharashtra are but a few examples.

Given the ideological straitjacket, even in the case where the right wing becomes the new ally of the imperial forces, the Left can only push the narrative of "Hindu fascism as it does now.

In fact, a Hindu rashtra will offer an unprecedented convenience to imperial forces a complacent right-wing and an ineffective Left.

Three, it assumes right wing cant achieve anything beyond winning a few elections

Mustafa seems to be banking on the assumption that a lot of left-wing intellectuals have that the Indian right wing simply doesnt have a coherent constructive ideology or strategy beyond criticising Congress and the Left. It can change the name, but it has no alternative to Nehruvian secularism in practice.

The Left has always assumed that the emergence of a political Hindu is impossible due to the internal contradictions of the Hindu society.

Not that the Left cant see that there is real anger among Hindus based on genuine grievances, but it is sure that given the lack of intellectual leadership, it will never be channelised into anything concrete.

The Left-wing intellectuals themselves proudly proclaim that there are almost no right wing intellectuals in India. So the best the right-wing can do is win some elections, but in the intellectual domain, it will always remain on the fringe.

That means, while some ad hoc innocuous measures like CAA can crop up here and there, the right-wing wont ever have any real, long term productive power.

It also means that the right-wing movement will be limited to one political party all eggs in one basket; and right-wingers will never amount to anything more than IT cell and bhakts.

Fourth, the surety that a Hindu rashtra will fail and its failure will sound death the knell of the Hindu movement

The proposal also has an underlying sadism if India becomes a Hindu rashtra, it will only end up the way Nazi Germany did beaten, disgraced and untouchable.

The Germans were rescued by their fellow white men but the guilt of a failed Hindu rashtra would be so immense that the Hindus won't dare become political again, and retire to a permanent passiveness.

It would sound the death knell of the Hindu culture and philosophy that survived centuries of persecution.

The same fear is visible in the older generation of the right-wing intellectuals who, as a result, restrained the movement tightly.

The likes of Arun Shourie did a great job exposing the left cabal but always maintained a suspicion of the right-wing politics.

All the four points discussed above pose substantial challenge for the right-wing, and must be taken seriously.

The movement definitely has a long way to go, be it organising and educating the masses in Indic politics, or having a voice loud-enough to penetrate the intellectual ivory towers.

However, at the same time, the recent trends suggest that the days of Hindu movement being defined by the Left are over.

One, a Hindu political being is already here

The Left banking on the internal contradictions of Hindu society for divide and rule hasnt noticed that pan-Hindu unity and a Hindu political being is already on the scene.

Research shows that contrary to the claims that it is an upper-caste party, the BJPs social base is now broad-based and mirrors the Hindu society.

The shift of the poor, rural and lower caste voters to BJP is ideological, and those who identify with BJP arent swayed by short-term considerations.

This shouldnt come as a surprise to intellectuals. It is a logical outcome of the path our political and intellectual leaders took and the choices they made after independence.

Also read: New Research, Old Findings: Rural, Poor And Lower Caste Voters Are Behind Phenomenal Rise Of BJP

Two, Intellectuals can exist outside the ecosystem

Imperialists-financed incentive structure means the Left dominates the knowledge ecosystem, and attracts more career-minded ambitious folks.

But the humanities and social sciences arent such specialised disciplines that the people not trained in them for years cannot penetrate.

.As much expertise the intellectuals like to credit to themselves, its not very hard to master the English language and explain things in it.

The Hindu movement does not have to depend on the mercy of the ecosystem for intellectual leadership.

Three, young right-wingers today are very different from the older generation

The Left incentive structure is controlled by a few oldies at the top. While this means better organisation, it also means lesser intelligence and flexibility to respond to changes on ground.

On the other hand, right-wing isnt as organised, but is filled with and driven by young minds.

These young people born post-liberalisation can imagine a life without a maai-baap state. They dont toe the line that the Left has set for them by marking no go zones with the labels of fascism, bhakt, troll, saffron etc.

The Left has so far managed Indians by fear and intimidation.

But young Indians today think for themselves, fiercely protect their autonomy and dont cow-down to moral shaming.

Unlike the older generation of right-wing intellectuals, they are neither reluctant nor ashamed to assert own existence with full force.

Sure, they are a little rough around the edges, but its a minor problem that can be solved by little guidance.

Four, Hindus arent clueless fanatics. They know what they are fighting, and what is it that they want

The Left threatens Indians into submitting to the imperial forces lest multiple identities regarding caste, language, region pull apart the nation.

Too bad it cannot see that hundreds of right-wing groups with young people from a variety of backgrounds are a continuing experiment of respectful co-existence which is neither marred by Lefts victimology-driven over-sensitivity, nor oppressive caste hierarchy or cowbelt dominance.

Mustafa says Hindutva fanatics will be hugely disappointed to know that the Hindu rashtra will not be entirely different from the current secular state.

Professor Mustafa will be disappointed to know that that the Hindus are no more fooled by a superficial change, like that of the Nehru surname to Gandhi.

What Hindus are demanding is a rigorous evaluation of the past crimes against them, the ideas that propelled it, and breaking the structures that continue to push the same ideas. Fight is not against certain groups, but certain ideas.

For the sake of brevity, we wont go in the details of what Indic thought is, and how the Indic movement is tackling the long-term challenges of caste discrimination, communalism, etc.

Suffice to say that both the diagnoses and solutions are more accurate and effective than the Lefts oppressor-oppressed binary.

Five, the current Hindu movement has same creative power as the Indian National Movement

In the real-world outside Leftist fantasies, the right-wing is not composed of just some street-level clueless fanatics. It is not an aberration of history, a high tide that is destined to go down.

The aberration in Indian history is the hegemony of Left in independent India that, in alliance with global capitalists and imperialists, made the legacy of the freedom movement stand on its head.

Also read: Indian Lefts Fall From Grace: Those Who Criticised Global Capitalism Are Now Taking Orders From Foreign Masters

Its time to bring out Gandhi, Bose, Tagore and others mummified and neatly arranged in the museum of Indian Left; breathe a new life into their ideas, and build upon the foundation laid by them.

The current Indic movement situates itself as a successor of the Indian national movement. Its a river that slowly but steadily cuts its way.

It is the continuation of the fight for the ideals of the freedom fighters, be it Tagores atmasakti; Ghoshs reawakening of Indias ancient spirit ; Vivekanandas idea of service, Ambedkars organise, Tilaks swaraj, Boses India is calling or Gandhis Ram Rajya.

Continue reading here:
Some Liberals Are Warming Up To The Idea Of Hindu Rashtra Over Nehruvian Secularism, Whats The Catch? - Swarajya

Conservatives reject Liberals’ tentative agreement with NDP, Bloc on Parliament’s return – CBC.ca

The Liberal governmentreached a tentative agreementwith the NDP and the Bloc Qubcois about the conditions under which Parliament could reconvene this week but the Conservatives' rejection of thatdeal could lead to MPsreturning to the Commons on Monday.

"One sitting each week is unacceptable, even if it is eventually supplemented by a virtual sitting for a handful of additional MPs," Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said during a news conference on Sunday. "Physical distancing means staying two metres apart, not staying away from Parliament."

The Official Opposition's insistence on meeting in the House of Commons three times a weekmeans negotiations between federal parties remain up in the air on the eve ofApril 20 thedateMPs were intendedto reconvene when Parliament adjourned five weeks ago.

The Liberal Party told its staff Sunday that if no deal is reached between all four parties before late Monday morning, the party will attend theHouse sittingin reduced numbersand with minimal staff present.

That would scenario would see the NDP and the Bloc each sending three MPs to the House. B.C. MP Paul Manly would attend on behalf of the Greens.

Scheer said the Conservatives are sending the same number of MPs as the last emergency sitting. The Liberals told CBC News they would do the same.

Scheer is scheduled to speak about Parliament's returnat 10:15 a.m. ET on Monday.

Earlier Sunday, Liberal House Leader Pablo Rodriguez shared on Twitter details of theagreement struck with the NDP and the Bloc, which includes a combination of in-person and virtual sittings each week.

"Under the agreement, the House of Commons will hold one day of in-person meetings per week, with a small group of MPsin the chamber. As well, there will be additional virtual sessions with a small number of MPs from across the country," the statement reads.

Rodriguez said the proposal will give MPs the same amount of time toquestion ministers and the prime minister as they would normally have under regular parliamentary circumstances.

During his Sunday COVID-19 briefing earlier in the day, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau criticizedthe Conservatives for their repeated calls to convene in the Commons' chamber.

"I'm looking forward to taking questions from opposition parties, but it has to be done in a responsible way and right now, the Conservatives are not taking a responsible approach," Trudeau said.

Late Saturday, CBC News learned that the Trudeau government had offered to compress five days of question period into two days a week.

The arrangement would have involvedvirtual sittings every Tuesday, with MPs across the country taking part in the equivalent of two question periods. On Wednesdays, a smaller number of MPs and the prime minister would sit in the House of Commons and face the equivalent of three question periods.

In contrast, the tentative deal between the Liberals, NDP and Blocstarts with a proposal for asingle in-person sitting beginning this Wednesday.

By next week, one session would be held virtually on Tuesday, followed by a sitting in the chamber on Wednesday.

The following week and all subsequent weeks would see MPs meeting virtually on Tuesdays and Thursdays and in-person on Wednesdays, for a total of three sessions per week.

The arrangement is similar to the NDP's initial recommendation, which called for the House to meet in-person once a week on top of two virtual sessions that would involve hearing from a larger contingent of MPs.

"I think the reality is the more we are meeting in person, the more that increasesthe risk. That's why the NDP proposal, I think, makes a lot of sense," said NDP House Leader Peter Julian.

Trudeau said during his morning remarksthat convening all 338 MPsand their staff in the House of Commons would amount to an "irresponsible" move due to public health guidance urging Canadians to practisephysical distancing.

Scheer fired back at the prime minister for suggesting that any parties were advocating for afull roster of MPs to return to the Commons on Monday.

"That is completely false, and it's disingenuous to try to put that forward before Canadians as if that was a real scenario," Scheer said.

The outgoing leader also said that his proposal which includes two hours per session to question ministers is in line with theprotocols legislators followed during the government's last two emergency sittings.

"Thirty-twoMPs attended representing all parties," Scheer said. "This allowed us to follow public health advice and still carry out our duties."

While the Green Party of Canada does not hold recognized party status, former leader Elizabeth May saidshesupports sitting in the Commons only if there is a compelling reason to do so, such as passing legislation.

Commenting on Scheer's insistence thatvirtual sittings do not allow for proper parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, May said she believes remote platforms do just fine when it comes to holding politicians to account.

"We've already seen standing committees meet by Zoom," May said in an interview with CBC News. "I've seen [Conservative MP] Pierre Poilievre go at Bill Morneau. It wasn't any different in quality than question period. His opportunities were exactly the same."

More here:
Conservatives reject Liberals' tentative agreement with NDP, Bloc on Parliament's return - CBC.ca

ANN COULTER: Liberalism, like the Wuhan virus, will never die – MDJOnline.com

The media are outraged that President Trump is talking about re-opening the country, following their previous position that he sure was taking his sweet time at opening up the country.

Fortunately, the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions death forecasts from the Wuhan coronavirus have shrunk from 1.7 million Americans in mid-March; to 100,000 to 200,000 two weeks ago, provided there were massive suppression efforts; to most recently 60,000.

Every week, it seems, were another two weeks away from the apex.

According to a model recently published in The New York Times, if Trump had issued social distancing guidelines just two weeks earlier on March 2, rather than March 16 instead of 60,000 Americans dying from the Chinese coronavirus (projected!), only 6,000 would have died.

If thats what a two-week quarantine would have done, then how about a four-week quarantine?

By the end of the month, 90% of the country will have been shut down, quarantined and socially distancing for FOUR WEEKS. A majority of Americans have already been under these self-isolation rules for three weeks. (And most of the rest live in rural communities 16 miles from one another.)

Two weeks is the magic number. Test positive for the Wuhan: self-quarantine for two weeks. Come into contact with someone who has it: self-quarantine for two weeks. Traveling from New York, New Jersey or Connecticut: self-quarantine for two weeks.

With cold and flu viruses, people develop symptoms after just five days. But to be extra safe, were assuming the Wuhan virus can be transmitted for a full two weeks after contact.

After two weeks, youre either sick or the infection has passed through you with no symptoms.

Again: Its been three. Does social distancing work or doesnt it?

After four weeks of self-isolation, wont 90% of the country be Wuhan-free? Or are we in a sci-fi movie with a virus that can live forever without a host?

For the tiny percentage of the country not in self-isolation for the past three weeks, either because they are essential workers or because they are screw-offs, lets add them to the vulnerable list. Everyone take special precautions around doctors, nurses, grocery store employees and people who dont follow orders just as we do around the elderly and immunocompromised.

By May 1, even most of the slackers will have worked through the Wuhan. There havent been any large gatherings for them to attend, and almost everyone else has been staying 6 feet away from them. Theyve had a month to infect one another and either live or die.

In any event, unless all the claims about social distancing are nonsense, then a ONE-MONTH nationwide quarantine should have killed off the Wuhan in 90% of us, allowing a return to mostly normal life. (It goes without saying that Trumps travel bans will have to remain in place.)

I notice that the same people telling Americans they must remain at home indefinitely were indignant about closing bathhouses in response to the AIDS epidemic. Back then, the media and all gays except Randy Shilts said: How dare you ask us to shut down the bathhouses! Theyre part of gay culture. It would be like asking Catholics to stop visiting the Sistine Chapel!

But putting the entire country under stay-at-home orders? No problem.

Another liberal about-face since the AIDS era gives me an idea for how to re-open the country.

Liberals are furious with Trump for expressing optimism about the experimental drug hydroxychloroquine. When it came to AIDS, the gay communitys successful campaign to compel the FDA to allow compassionate use of unapproved drugs was a civil rights milestone on the order of Selma.

In a 1990 editorial, for example, The New York Times praised the educated and articulate gay spokesmen for bringing about changes in the traditional methods of testing drugs, adding that the new procedures were a compassionate response to AIDS sufferers.

By contrast, today the media are absolutely ghoulish in their hope for hydroxychloroquine to fail. The drug is approved for malaria patients, so its safe; its simply not approved specifically to treat the Chinese virus.

The reason for the medias hostility to hydroxychloroquine is obvious: Trump expressed enthusiasm for the treatment, so liberals are required to take the opposite position.

Its just like the Democrats recent infatuation with open borders. Until Trump, nearly every Democrat was for or claimed to be for border security, deporting criminal aliens and ending the anchor baby scam.

But as the Times Frank Bruni said, Democrats are defining themselves as antonyms to Trump. Why else, he wondered, would Democrats push policies like open borders, which wont go down well with many of the voters the party needs?

Perhaps we could use this liberal neurosis to our advantage. To re-open the country, we need Trump to come out against it.

Ann Coulter is the writer of 12 best-selling books, including In Trump We Trust.

Here is the original post:
ANN COULTER: Liberalism, like the Wuhan virus, will never die - MDJOnline.com

Liberals ease access to emergency benefit, plan to top up wages – Investment Executive

Seasonal workers who have exhausted their regular EI benefits and whose seasonal work has been disrupted by the outbreak will also qualify.

The changes will be retroactive to March 15.

For those doing jobs deemed essential and making less than $2,500 a month, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the federal government will top up their pay to encourage them to keep going into work during the health and economic crisis.

The payment will come through a transfer to the provinces to boost pay for front-line workers in hospitals, long-term care facilities and food services, a government backgrounder said.

Quebec and B.C. already implemented wage support for low-income essential workers.

He says the government is still weeks away from seriously considering loosening public health restrictions to reopen the domestic economy, something that will be done in phases with some regions and industries starting sooner than others.

The changes begin to address key concerns about who qualifies for the $2,000-a-month benefit, which was quickly put in place earlier this month to deal with the pandemics economic fallout.

In the last month, the national economy has contracted sharply as businesses have been ordered closed and Canadians told to stay home.

Preliminary data from Statistics Canada on Wednesday showed economic activity collapsed in March, suggesting the drop could be a record 9%.

Some six million people have applied for the help since the middle of March when businesses were ordered closed and workers to stay at home as a public health precaution.

Employment Minister Carla Qualtrough said it was too early to say how many people will apply for the help, or how much it will add to the cost of the $24-billion program.

She said much will rest on how many companies use an upcoming $73 billion wage subsidy program, which will cover up to 75% of employee salaries. The government is expecting companies to take advantage of the program to keep workers tied to an employer, meaning fewer of them would be in receipt of the CERB.

View original post here:
Liberals ease access to emergency benefit, plan to top up wages - Investment Executive