Mediaboss Marketing

Its been a sad week to be a liberal, again. Nothing seems to be going right for our betters and aspiring masters. America continues to prosper, to their dismay. Their conspiracy theories are turning into borscht. Donald Trump is breaking their collective collectivist spirit. They cant even manage to effectively blame conservatives for things conservatives didnt do.

Bathe in their tears. The salty goodness of their sob juice will add a radiant glow to your skin and put a spring in your step.

People are digging the tax bill, which is weird since it killed all of those who survived the mass extinction that followed Trumps withdrawal from the Paris Climate Grift. The stock market bump has largely stopped bumping. Remember the other week when the savvy market players at MSNBC were hoping that Paul Krugmans stock tips were finally going to pay off? Yeah, not so much. There is nothing that liberals hate more than the inevitable prosperity that follows the inauguration of a truly conservative administration.

But what about George W. Bush!?!?!?!?

Like I said, the inevitable prosperity that follows the inauguration of a truly conservative administration.

The Democrats tiptoed through the tulips into the kill zone of Donald Trumps immigration ambush and still probably think they won even as their fantasies of a dozen million new Democrats lies there, a pile of smoldering rubble. Trump played it as we hoped he never really wanted to give the amnesty he offered, but he offered enough to build up the dreams of the Dreamers knowing that the Democrats would crush those dreams under their Birkenstocks. See, if the Democrats had gone for Trumps proposal and imposed real border security, not only would that have turned off the Fresh Democrat Voter spigot but would have left them with zip to pretend to trade for amnesty for the big score, the other 10 million plus illegal aliens who have invaded our country. But now the Democrats have nothing, and Trump is tweeting to Dreamers accurately that the Democrats betrayed them because all the Democrats really care about is replacing the current electorate with a more bueno one.

Democrats, why do you hate Dreamers dreams?

The liberals were also sad about how they cant blame the recent shooting on conservatives at least not honestly. How many outright false stories did their Democrat transcriptionists in the mainstream media have to correct as they desperately tried to tie this murderer to patriotic conservatives? Its got to be deeply disappointing when, time after time, the killers stubbornly refuse to be conservative, observant Christian or Jewish NRA members. Instead, Jackie Earle Haleys mutant doppelgnger cultivates the kind of anti-Semitic, race-obsessed weirdness that would have made him fit right in on any liberal college campus.

The liberals lies no longer work, and they are realizing it. Too bad they got nothing else. They demand more power for the government, yet in seemingly every one of these cases it turns out the government has totally dropped the ball. Perhaps tracking down a guy who babbles online about shooting up a school cuts into their on-the-job sexting action. Better give the bureaucrats who screwed-up this and multiple other cases even more power, and take rights away from the citizens who didnt do anything wrong becauseuhwell, uh, you must like mass murder if you dare ask questions like that!

Nope, not an effective argument. And the liberals seem to know it. They are just going through the motions with their reflexive claims that the Normals who had nothing to do with this atrocity are to blame. Whether you are some stand-up comic tweets about how Normals blood on your hands because a dirtbag mutant a continent away committed a crime after the FBI shrugged, or a millennial doofus who writes for Vox trying to explain Heller without stating its basic holding, it just doesnt work anymore. Nor do tweets about how awful it is that Trump is smiling with the heroes from that awful day it must means he likes school shootings, I guess. Seems legit. Whatever.

The left is shooting intellectual and rhetorical blanks, because now were wait for it woke. We see the truth. No one who wants us to give up our guns does so because they want us to be more able to defend ourselves from crime or tyranny. Their agenda is clear, no matter how much they lie and deny.

Disarmament is key to converting us from citizens to subjects, and were just not playing that game. So they mutter about the NRA which you need to join if you dig freedom and we keep buying guns and ammunition to create the facts on the ground that will ensure their long-sought after end state of another Venezuela will never happen here.

And for the folks who forgot about that whole American Revolution thing, and are unfamiliar with the insurgencies in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, heres a look at the power of armed citizens with small arms and how they can absolutely fight and win against would-be dictators in the modern world.

Then theres their pivot to the latest bimbo trying to use an alleged ancient fling with the president to get some attention. The liberals once again got all aroused by the idea that this would do him in with his fans: Well, your so-called president got with a Playboy Playmate and also a porn star and also a Slovenian super model and..andwait

Yeah, thatll totally take out Trump. Well turn on him because he allegedly scored with too many hot women.

You know, we kept warning them how they would hate the new rules, and now they so do. You normalize Oval Office trysts with chubby cigar aficionados and then when you start whining because a then-playboy canoodles with a then-Playboy Playmate, and youre stunned that instead of us hanging our heads we start offering high-fives?

We dont care. Thats the new rule. Learn it. Know it. Live it.

And then theres Robert Mueller and his agonized admission that no American citizens were willingly involved with Russian meddling in the election. Note the word is now meddling. They dont use the word collusion anymore since Mueller admitted that there was no collusion which is what weve been saying for over a year in response to Team Felonia Milhous von Pantsuits pathetic attempt to explain away her humiliating defeat at the hands of patriotic Americans.

Instead of frog-marching the whole of Trump World out of the West Wing for partying with Putin, Muellers festival of liberal onanism has instead resulted in indictments of a bunch of trolls who remain safely out-of-reach in Vladivostok, the better to avoid the feds being humiliated in court like they were by Cliven Bundy. But hey they were going for Trump and instead got the mastermind manipulators behind 13 follower accounts such as @MAGATrumpMAGAGuy and @BernieSuperFan72, so thats almost as good.

Collusions fades to meddling which fades to random tweeting which fades to framed victim of liberal machinations Mike Flynn either withdrawing his coerced guilty pleas or getting a presidential pardon based on the tidal wave of recent revelations of wrongdoing swirling about his railroading. Either one works.

Yeah, its been a sad week to be a liberal, again. Good.

See the original post:
Liberals Fail, Volume XXXVII - Kurt Schlichter

United We Dream executive director Cristina Jimnez, whose group has mobilized its grass roots to push for Dreamer protection, tweeted that "Dems failed to fight & use their leverage to protect immigrant youth." | Reed Saxon/AP Photo

Activist groups were angry at how the negotiations turned out, with some calling it '#SchumerSellout.'

By ELANA SCHOR

01/22/2018 02:09 PM EST

Updated 01/22/2018 04:21 PM EST

Liberal activists are furious with Democratic senators after most of them agreed to reopen the federal government without a firm path to shielding young immigrants from deportation.

As the third day of the shutdown dawned, liberal advocates and immigration groups fired off a joint statement blasting as unacceptable Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnells offer merely to hold a vote on immigration with no promises for action from the House or White House in exchange for Democratic votes to reopen the government. But three hours later, Democratic senators agreed to just those terms sparking anger on the left.

Story Continued Below

Millions of people flooded the streets of every major American city to stand up to Trump this weekend, tweeted Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of the influential activist network Indivisible. Your constituents want you to fight. How can you possibly not understand that?

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Monday argued Democrats secured critical assurance for Dreamers, who are at risk for deportation as soon as March after President Donald Trumps decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

We have a way to address the fate of the Dreamers, starting right now instead of waiting until March, Schumer said on the floor.

But activist groups that have provided his caucus crucial firepower during fights against GOP health care and tax bills were not buying that explanation.

Murshed Zaheed, political director of the liberal group CREDO Action, said Democrats decision shows Schumers willingness to betray progressives.

Call it the #SchumerSellout, he said in an interview. Hashtagged.

Ben Wikler, Washington director of MoveOn.org, slammed McConnells offer to Democrats and lamented the minoritys splintering over protecting Dreamers.

Whats clear from todays joke deal is that the grass-roots movement demanding unity and courage has a lot of work to do to ensure that the whole Democratic Caucus is ready to fight when the time comes, he said in an interview.

United We Dream Executive Director Cristina Jimnez, whose group has mobilized its grass roots to push for Dreamer protection, tweeted that Dems failed to fight & use their leverage to protect immigrant youth. A false promise to vote on immigration from Rs is not a strategy to win. We wont be fooled. This vote means deportation.

Not every group on the left lambasted Senate Democrats on Monday.

Organizing for Action, an offshoot of the political organizing arm built by former President Barack Obama, attempted to keep the blame for the three-day shutdown on the GOP, even as it offered faint praise for the Senate agreement.

The good news for the American people is that the government shutdown a crisis needlessly manufactured by Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and the White House will soon be over, OFA spokesman Jesse Lehrich said in a statement. But lets be clear: This stopgap measure is not a solution. Its merely a band-aid for a self-inflicted wound that remains untreated.

Schumer spokesman Matt House urged all supporters of Dreamer aid to come together around securing the strongest possible showing for an immigration deal next month, when McConnell has vowed to move to a debate on the issue.

Lets take advantage of the renewed attention and sympathy for Dreamers, and focus on winning the vote 17 days from now, House wrote in an email.

House Democratic leaders are expected to vote against the Senates three-week government funding patch, which cleared a key procedural hurdle on an 81-18 vote. That opposition may ensure that the ire of activists remains trained on the upper chamber, where only 16 Democrats voted against advancing the stopgap bill.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

View post:
Liberals livid after deal to end shutdown - POLITICO

No one wants to hear that they are ugly. It is a physical manifestationthat one is not attractive enough for the opposite sexto pass on their genes. By nature, humans want to have access to the highest value mate available. It is one of the simplest insults yet one of the most effective, unless the target knows, basing his reasoning on facts, that according to criteria that have not changed since the dawn of time, he or she is not ugly but more attractive than a large portion of the population.

We have observed extensively how feminism and other leftist principles can ruin someones appearancein mere years. Even the science that those liberals love so much confirms it.But by dissecting what causes these extreme changes, we can call out its supporters and give them the dose of truth that could help them see the light if they did notrefuse to ingest it.

We will not include here cases ofdisfigurement due to birth defects, accidents or diseases. We will focus on manageable physical beauty.Universal and eternal beauty standards exist: men should be tall, muscular, visually successful etc. Women should be young, fertile, have long hair, feminine faces, big breasts, balanced, round buttocks among other things. Optimum beauty can be synthetically engineered as we know what are its key elements.

Liberals are not born uglier. They voluntarily remain ugly or become uglier to fit a narrative. Appearance is ideology.It takes a special kind of hypocrisyto call something that is universally seen as ugly beautiful and vice-versa.Now lets get to the roots of liberal ugliness.

Sociallyprivilegedpeople or those born with no deformitywont have to work as hard to reach attractiveness as they know that they have a safety net. They can spend more time at university, listening for hours to liberal professors who never worked a day in their life and believe in social justice. They will let themselves go and become ugly if they believe that beauty is what is inside.

They also have a weaker bond with their peers. Their school of thought neglects the notions of realism or adversity, left-leaning voters tend to see human relationships, such as friendship, as granted. They dehumanize their fellow activists and see them more like tools to reach their goals. This is why they care less about each others appearance, are less objective when they call something beautiful and can so easily turn on one another.

Where are the friends that should tell her the truth?

Whereas those who had to be dedicated to reach beauty know what hard work means. Conservatives understand the sexual market even if they can think that it isunfair and translate it through their conservative political opinion.

Staying attractive requires work. I rarely, among the younger generations, came across an obese person that is naturally conservative. Laziness in health reflects itself in politics with the obvious choice of gibs me dat, junk food and claiming that being a sad sack of lard is equivalent to being a cancer patient.

Good looking people tend to earn more money, either through their ability to convinceor the inner strength they needed to reach this level of beauty (principle applied to their work ethic that leads to results), hence are more hostile to see their hard-earned wealth redistributed, through welfare for example. That phenomenon could explain why they tend to be conservatives.

It is much harder to work out and watch what you eat than become a fat sod and claim that you are attractive and attack people that still think normally and state the fact that you are ugly.

This is where the snowflake moniker comes from: I am special, look at me or I dont fit the mold, check out my new tattoo. They see that they do not reach the universal standards of beauty so they want to change its definition and punish those who challenge them. Like a sport where you can reach the top only through hard work and dedication, but someone decides to change the rules at the last minute then accuses the others of cheating.

Right-wing people, because they decide to accept life as it is (even if they hate it), know that nothing comes for free and that effortis always needed.

One of the core values of the Left could be summed up with I do not have to make any sacrifices, things will be given to me and people will accept me as I am. Due to biology and reality, we know that this is impossible.

Quite often, liberals justify their failure to succeed in the current system because of someone else holding them down. They have no one else to blame but themselves and still try to bring others down to their level. The people that call for change are almost always the ones that fail in the already existing order.

The Left made the refusal of reality their standard. Looks matter, money doesnt make you happy but is still essential, not everyone is equal, one cannot help the whole world, etc. Those truths can not be accepted as it would crush social warriors very existence

This study (like anyone with a pair of eyes) confirms that conservative female politicianstend to display ultra-feminine attributes (long hair, dresses, softer body language) to attract or convince higher value men from the same political tribe. Liberal female politicians always seem more masculine (read ugly)

Liberals can call a morbidly obese woman with a shaved head and large tattoos beautiful or inspirational, just like an onlooker will pretend to find modern art beautiful just to be part of the circle of smug liberals when that art is often nothing more than an actual pile of shit.

Equality is a false god.They cannot admit they are wrong or the narrative would collapse. Effeminatemen with perceived low social status are not attractive to women just like masculine women obsessed with being strong and independent are unattractive to men.

Leftists are also guilty when they accept media lies. Either they do not have the ability or choose not to see through the ideological manurethe Mainstream media feeds them (I would believe the latter).This is also why Liberals want to control the language and redefinewhat words mean in order to support their dogma.

By advertising their ugliness as beauty and showing media support to ugly people, liberals convey the message that they can see past the physical aspect and be SO progressive.Nothing could be further from the truth, especially in their private life. But they must sing their false song when they are broadcasted.Following the laws of the sexual market, if their survivaldepended on it, ugly feminist land-whales would quickly learn that it is an advantage to look good.

There are genuinely attractive Liberals, those who are exposed in the media or have some degree of elite-approved fame. They are attractive because it is needed to sell what the people in chargepush for,because beauty and sexual attraction sell. Ugliness does not.

Those famous left-wingersare what French author and ideologist Alain Soralcalls the thought police auxiliaries, who enforce the Elites agenda and are rewarded through their zeal.

Liberal beautiful celebrities only act liberal. They do not want to share their wealth with the poor, open their house to refugees or go for a walk with bodyguards that advocate forgun control by remaining unarmed. They only follow what they are told to do, to get attention and surf the wave of political correctness. Or their bosses will blacklist them and destroy their careers.

I am the first to agree that they are also ugly, fat conservatives. What is unacceptable is if they are happy with their situation and do nothing to change it.

In our age of cultural collapse, it is undeniable that a person that intentionally becomes ugly tends to vote left where the majority of beautiful people among the general publicthink towardsthe right.

Must See: 27 Attractive Girls Who Became Ugly Freaks Because Of Feminism

Read the rest here:
Why Liberals Are So Physically Monstrous And Repulsive ...

Ive studied numerous psychologists, from Freud to Jung, and from Berne to Maslow, but one of the most interesting psychologists out there is Timothy Leary.

Despite being a Professor at Harvard in the early 1960s, his seemingly stable position was completely pulled out from underneath him, due to his controversial work involving LSD. At one point, the US government even hated him so much that they gave him 30 years in prison for a minor possession of marijuana, which he claims they planted on him.

Leary, after years of extensive studies, research, and experimentation, developed a framework through which to understand the human mind: the 8 Circuits of Consciousness. The goal of this article is to better understand how leftists think, and what sort of childhood events would lead to such a vehement position on social justice. First, however, I will give a brief analysis of the 8 circuits.

A good introductory book to this theory, as I spoke about here, is Prometheus Rising by Dr. Robert Anton Wilson.Sadly the book is not in print anymore (its a hidden gem that not many people know about), but if you dont feel like buying the kindle version you can check out an hour long YouTube video that I made about the 8 Circuit Model.

In a nutshell, the model claims that human beings have 8 circuits of consciousness, or 8 ways of interpreting external information. When a child is born, he only uses the first circuit. Then, as he gets older, he activates the second. Then, he activates the third, and the fourth.

Most human beings stop here; only a select few have ever activated the latter four. Buddha likely activated the 6th circuit, Jesus the 5th, and Beethoven the 7th.

Due to the complexity of the latter four circuits, I will not discuss them. I will, however focus heavily on the first four, because they have a massive impact in creating a liberal robot. Once a circuit is imprinted, it is extremely difficult to undo. This is why it is so god damn hard to convince liberals of their misguided ways. As I go through this psychological model, and explain why liberals believe what they do, you should start to see just how robotized some people really are.

This is what Carl Sagan would call the Reptilian brain and what Freud would call the oral imprint. This circuit is activated when a child is first born, and is imprinted all the way up until he becomes a toddler. This circuit interprets environmental stimulus in one of two ways: either its pleasurable, or painful. Good, or bad. Safe, or unsafe. Typically, the mother plays the integral role in imprinting this circuit.

If this circuit receives ample conditioning that the world is a good place, by receiving enough food, enough love, and enough pleasure, the child will grow up to believe that the world is generally a very safe place.

If this circuit receives ample conditioning that the world is a bad place, by being frequently hungry, not receiving enough love, and experiencing a large amount of pain, the child will grow up to believe that the world is generally a very unsafe place.

Liberals are almost always indefinitely imprinted with a negative world-view. This is why liberals, when theyre adults, tend to the view the world as being an unsafe place. They need daddy government, to take care of everything for them, because the world is scary.

They need the strong patriarchy to stop hurting their feelings, because the world is too scary for them to handle.

This is what Carl Sagan would call the mammalian brain and what Freud would call the anal imprint. This circuit is activated around the time that a child becomes a toddler, and is imprinted all the way up until around age 6 or 7. This circuit interprets relationships with other human beings in one of two ways: am I dominant, or submissive? Am I top-dog or bottom-dog? Am I alpha male, or beta male? Typically, the father plays an integral role in imprinting this circuit.

Have you ever wondered why toddlers are so god damn emotional? Its because theyre starting to develop their egoam I dominant (anger) or submissive (fear)? This is why toddlers typically go through a mine phase, as well. Theyre claiming their territory, so to speak.

If a childs father is a strong, masculine man who is a good role model, the child will model himself after his father and be dominant in most interactions. Not in an obtrusive, egotistical way, but rather hell view himself as an alpha male; as the leader.

If a childs father is very weak and if that childs mother runs the relationship, this child will inevitably have a submissive, imprint in this circuit. He will typically be bullied in grade school, because others can sense his weakness.

Every single leftist has this submissive imprint, which is almost always due to an overbearing mother. Conversely, sometimes it can also be caused by an abusive father; regardless, this is the psychology of a liberal. This is why liberals typically need top dog government to help them. They feel the need to be submissive, and rely on someone else to take the lead (in this case the government).

This is why liberals typically dislike masculine men; it points out their own submissiveness and inadequacies. Its why leftists are typically very spineless and are afraid to stand up for anything that isnt the norm. This is also why they typically have a mother-boy dynamic in their romantic relationships.

Have you ever seen hyper-liberals with their wives? They typically act like a little boy afraid of offending mommy and her feminist ideologies. This is why. Theyre conditioned to be submissive from a young age, which allows a nanny state to easily come into play, breaks apart the family unit, and creates a man without a backbone.

This is what Carl Sagan would call the human brain. Interestingly enough, Freud skips over this one, likely because, like a fish surrounded by water, Freud is so surrounded by his ideology that he cant even see it.

This circuit is typically imprinted from the ages of 7 to 13, when a child goes through rigorous schooling on how to write, how to read, etc. Its concerned with creating a map to better understand reality; in other words, its your religion, your beliefs, your opinions, and your political ideology. Its your general world-view put into words. This circuit is not binary (only A or B) like the previous ones; it can have an almost unlimited number of imprints.

The catch, however, is that because most people dont use logic to understand reality, this circuit is typically just an extension of circuits 1 and 2. For example, as I said before, most liberals have a negative first and second circuit imprint: they believe the world is very unsafe, and that theyre bottom-dog/submissive. So, what do you think happens when they start to form a map of reality?

They become a socialist. Now, of course this belief stems from their deeply seeded feelings of inadequacy, fear, and weakness, which is why they want daddy government to take care of them, but they arent even aware of this.

Their third circuit will come up with all sorts of justifications and logical fallacies to explain away these gnawing feelings:

Despite the obvious flaws within these statements, liberals literally cannot even comprehend why theyre wrong. As Roosh said before, its because liberals argue fromemotionnot from reason.In other words, their first and second circuits create the reality map that is their third circuit.

Their third circuit basically, then, does nothing but go back and justify their original imprints and emotions. They will selectively seek out information to confirm their biases, and ignore any and all information that contradicts them.

This is why hyper-liberals can claim that men are useless pigs, despite the fact that men are the very ones who are giving them the right to vote, protecting them in war, and paying taxes for their welfare. This is why Leftism isliterallya mental disorder.

For the liberal, their third circuit is merely a logical extension and justification of their underlying fear, depression, feelings of inadequacy, and general victim-complex.

This is what Freud would call the sexual imprint. Its much more than that, howeverits when a child begins to develop deeper connections with those around him. This circuit is responsible for tribal information. What is the reality-tunnel that your local tribe, school, church, or community has?

This circuit is how religious beliefs, political beliefs, and other ideologies, are typically passed down from generation to generation. Its a survival mechanism that ensures we are able to fit in, lest we be ostracized and end up starving to death.

This is why liberalism infecting our schools is so god damn insidious. Hyper-liberals take advantage of this critical period, when children are most vulnerable to being imprinted with various ideologies, norms, and sexual practices. Its why homosexuality is practically the norm now, why transgenderism is on its way, and why pedophilia and zoophilia are next up.

Prior to the internet and media, it was the local high school, the neighbors, and the church that imprinted a child with various cultural beliefs. Now, however, the brainwashing box right in front of our noses has been tearing these strong pillars of culture down.

What a child is exposed to during this time period is of the utmost importance; it will, for the most part, determine his lifelong sexual interests and cultural beliefs. Most Leftists, during this time in their lives, are exposed to homosexuality, transgenderism, and cultural Marxism by their schoolteachers, their peers, and the media. This only exacerbates their previous imprinting (circuits 1-3).

This is why leftists become pan-sexual, or any other weird deviancy. They believe that theres something fundamentally wrong with them; it goes so deep that it even changes their sexuality.

This is why once leftists grow up, they dye their hair and break social norms. They are so desperate to be bullied (and confirm their first circuit bias that the world is unsafe and their second circuit bias that theyre bottom dog) that they go out of their way to dress up in a bunch of weird shit that they know will get them made fun of.

This is why leftists preach equality and become political activists. They use this to meet other like-minded degenerates and can all hide their feelings of inadequacy and self-hatred by trying to bring others down.

Feminism is cancer.

During a leftists early childhood, his mother likely doesnt pay enough attention to him. Hes frequently hungry, in pain, and deprived of love. This creates the foundation of leftism; that the world is generally unsafe.

So then, when the leftist becomes a toddler, he is plagued by a chronic fear. This leads others to pick on him, which only further reinforces his first circuit imprint that the world is unsafe, and creates a new imprint: that hes bottom dog (second circuit binary imprint).

These two imprints create what is known as a victim complex. Victims typically view the world as being very unsafe, and they view themselves as being very weak, and not capable of protecting themselves from the perils that surround them. Does this not sound exactly like a liberal?

Then, when the liberal hits the age of cognition, when his neo-cortex starts to develop further, he enters into the third circuit imprinting period. Here he forms a number of beliefs that merely serve to justify his prior imprinting, such as:

From here, they start to enter the fourth circuit, primed and ready to fully accept liberal social principles. They often times take on a deviant sexual imprint, or they hate themselves so much that they cant even bear their own gender, so their fourth circuit effectively becomes an extension of their first two circuits.

From here, they go out into the world and get involved in social media and political activism, by grouping up with other like-minded individuals. This surrounding of themselves by liberals only enforces their fourth circuit imprinting that homosexuality, transgenderism, pansexualism, and whatever-the-fuck-else-ism is normal.

It is extremely difficult to undo a liberals imprinting without using unethical methods (LSD re-imprinting, brainwashing them, controlling their food and water supply to revert them to a childlike state, etc.). And even if these things werent unethical, we dont have the resources to do them.

So, what I propose, is that we simply become aware of this phenomena and work to stop it. I know this sounds so cliche, and Ive said it a million times, but we NEED TO start creating more masculine men in the world. And it starts with our youth. It starts with you and me.

Take a martial art, work out, and get your finances in check.Slowly we will start to undo the monstrosity that is modern liberalism. The most important thing, however, is that wetake action.

Dont put up with your girlfriend treating you like shit. Instead, learn how to actually get girls, so that you arent afraid to leave her. Dont accept bitchyexcuses. Be a fucking man and do what you need to do to get what you want to have.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

Read More: Analyzing The 5 Main Alpha Archetypes

More here:
The Psychology That Explains How People Become Liberals ...

Our allies in the fight against ISIS, handle their returning jihadis by stripping them of their citizenship or assassinating them on the battlefield but Canadas weak response is to rehabilitate these traitors, and this should concern all Canadians.

As ISIS is decimated on the battle fields of Syria and Iraq following new direction under General Mattis and President Trump, those fighters with citizenship or roots in the west will either find another soft spot from which to continue their fight or return home to the West.

According to CSIS director Michael Coulombe, 60 of the 180 Canadians who have left to fight abroad have thus far returned home from participating in terror activities abroad.

When they come home, the Canadian government offers 'reintegration' to these individuals who present real security threats.

Watch as I explain how the UK is approaching this very real threat, and then try to imagine a member of our Liberal government suggesting such a tough approach.

Instead, last week Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale told CBC News:

"Canada does not engage in death squads, With the battlefield activity winding down, there is a very real question about where the foreign fighters go"

We know Trudeau is against stripping the Canadian citizenship of terrorists, a practice the previous Harper Conservatives employed. This past June the Liberals passed a law barring it even in the case of individuals convicted of terror ties.

Between Goodale's comments and the actions of our authorities, it seems the Liberals believe in being nice and compassionate to terrorist returnees, but where are the treason charges or the terror related charges?

See more here:
Liberals to reintegrate Canadian ISIS fighters (while ...