Mediaboss Marketing

Add this infamy to all the other crimes of the liberal establishment its poisonous influence has converted the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in the eyes of the American people, from a proud institution dedicated to upholding the law into just another suppurating bureaucratic pustule. Where once we saw FBI agents as heroes many of us ancients grew up watching Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., every Sunday night now we see careerist hacks looking to suck-up to the Democrat elite while bending the law and subverting justice to do it. Truly, everything liberals touch dies.

The revelations about Oh-So-Special Agent Peter Strozk shouldnt surprise anyone, as bad as they are. Even that hack Robert Mueller couldnt keep him all-board the Russia Soft Coup Express after Strozks anti-Trump texts to his FBI mistress came out. Shocker this is the same Democrat-loving clown who watered down the Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit investigation conclusions (helpfully drafted months before the investigation concluded). Oh, and he oversaw the unsworn, unrecorded interview of his special gal (not the one he was cheating with; the one with the taste for Chardonnay and failure who would have helped his career as a reward for his slavish devotion had she not botched running against Donald Trump). He was also in on the ambush of LTG Mike Flynn, who he and his scuzzy compadres decided to prosecute while the Harpy, Huma and all the rest of the Clinton Nostra got a pass.

Oh, but for the lefty in-crowd, its Bros before Bureaus. The new head honcho Christopher Wray Where the hell is he hiding anyway?Is he locked in a gimp box somewhere in the Hoover Building? didnt even fire Strozk though intermural adultery is allegedly against the rules at the FBI. Nope, nothing builds confidence in a law enforcement agencys organizational integrity like bending the rules to protect your bigwig buddies.

Oh, wait outright payoffs do too! Dont even start on Andrew McCabe and his wifes Democrat contributions to her. Yeah, the wife of the FBI second-in-command got money from the Democrat Party and hes still not recused from this fake investigation. Are you kidding?

By the way, have we got even a single iota of information on what the unholy hell happened since Special Agent Johnson and Special Agent Johnson took over the investigation of the Las Vegas shooting?

Its long past time to lance this boil. Its sad when you have to accept that you cant talk to the FBI, that they cant be trusted to do justice, that you must protect yourself from being railroaded like LTG Flynn was and always always always always demand to speak to your attorney and demand that the FBI not question you if they come sniffing around. LTG Flynn trusted them not to have an agenda. Look what happened, and learn.

Its heartbreaking, because the FBIs real legacy a legacy field agents largely live today is a legacy of heroes.

Flashback to Miami, April 11, 1986. Eight agents make a felony stop on a car with two suspected bank robbers, igniting a firefight that demonstrated the bravery and devotion that should be what first comes to mind when any American thinks of the FBI.

William Russell Matix and Michael Lee Platt were ex-military and had killed before and they packed an arsenal that ensured they were not going quietly. The FBI agents, lightly armed with under-powered handguns and a couple 12 gauges came under intense rifle fire that the light vests some wore could not stop. In the end, seven of the eight agents were hit and Special Agent Benjamin Grogan and Special Agent Jerry Dove died fighting.

This was no long-range stand-off they fought it out with these psychos from just a few feet. Matix and Platt were both hit, but they were not going down. The agents were literally shot to pieces, but despite being outgunned, they didnt back off. Not one inch.

His forearm shattered by a .223 rifle slug, Special Agent Edmundo Mireles, Jr. (no surprise, a former Marine from Texas), pumped his Remington 870 shotgun with his one good arm again and again as he engaged the criminals. His buddies dead or wounded all around him, bleeding out, Mireles then drew his .357 and advanced on the pair, in the open and totally exposed, as they attempted to drive away in one of the FBI cars. He put six magnum slugs into the criminals and finally put them down.

Matix took six hits to kill, Platt a dozen. And Mireles? This hero went back on the job, and actually worked with my former battalion commander Colonel (Ret.) Bill Wenger in Afghanistan in the 2000s on assignment there for the FBI. Now thats a patriot. Now thats what the real FBI is all about.

This dramatization gives you a good idea of what happened. The legendary Miami shootout has been studied for three decades to gather lessons learned about proper tactics and equipment, but the most important lesson it teaches is about courage.

Thats the courage that these desk-riding bums in Washington are dishonoring every time they sell their souls and their honor to kiss up to skeevy politicians.

You see that sanctimonious clown James Comey on Twitter presuming to quote the Bible, and its all you can do to keep your lunch from launching. These timeserving ladder-climbers are not what the FBI is, but their petty institutional gamesmanship has now seared that impression into the consciousness of millions of Americans. When you would say FBI to a liberal, he/she/xe would snarl, seething at the Bureaus reputation for taking out the foreign and domestic terrorists progs love to play footsie with. But the tragedy is that when you say FBI to a conservative today, you get a sad shake of the head because we can no longer trust the Bureau because the top ranks are manifestly riddled with vindictive partisans angling for their own advantage.

Mueller, then Comey, and their progeny have done this. As liberals inevitably do, they have disgraced yet another proud institution. Imagine yourself a field agent, dedicated to upholding the law, and having to not only live under this corrupt regime but to have to share in the contempt the American people have learned to feel for it.

Its heartbreaking, because the reality of the FBI is not the Muellers and the Comeys and the McCabes and the Strozks and whoever Strozk was having an affair with. Its Special Agent Benjamin Grogan, Special Agent Jerry Dove, Special Agent Edmundo Mireles, Jr. and thousands of others who put their lives on the line for us every single day. They arent in the big upper-floor offices at HQ hiding documents from Congress or leaking to their pals at the WaPo. They arent mingling with Democrat bigwigs, schmoozing for their next step up the ladder. Theyre doing their job.

Maybe the FBI can recover its reputation someday I sure hope so. Maybe it can earn our trust and respect again. But the first step is for the President and Congress to pop this bureaucratic zit and clean out the pus.

Read the original here:
Liberals Have Turned The FBI Into A Disgrace - Kurt Schlichter

What in the sweet name of Santa Claus is wrong with liberals?

A popular doughnut shop in Portland, Maine, was forced to apologize to the community after it offended customers by working with the Salvation Army to provide Christmas to a needy family.

Click here for a free subscription to Todds newsletter: a must-read for Conservatives!

The Holy Donut had asked customers to help them with a gift drive for a local family with five children. Those customers who participated received free doughnuts.

The Holy Donut should be commended for helping a family in need and spreading a bit of Christmas cheer.

The doughnut shop reached out to the Salvation Army to find the family in need,the Press-Herald reports.

Instead of saluting the doughnut shop for doing a good deed an online mob stormed their Facebook page. Many accused the Salvation Army of being anti-gay and discriminating against the LGBT community.

It was all untrue, of course but the truth doesnt really matter these days.

They proselytize to the people in their programs, they reject LGBT people from their shelters, one outraged customer wrote. They have tried to scrub their image, but still discriminate.

For the record, the Salvation Army is a well-respected Christian ministry that provides shelter for the homeless, addiction programs and of course the iconic red kettles at Christmas time.

Nevertheless, some freedom-loving, donut eaters defended the popular mom-and-pop establishment.

Going after a doughnut shop because they dont like their politics is exactly why people voted for Trump, one observer wrote online.

I dont care if someone is L, G, B or T, but when they stand in the way of people helping people simply because their own personal noses are out of joint, they lose my respect and any sympathy I have for their cause, wrote another.

But the Press Herald reports that the anti-doughnut mob was unrelenting going so far as to threaten boycotts unless the donut shop renounced its association with the Salvation Army.

In case you forgot, a solid 70 percent of your clientele is part of the LGBTQ community, one rabble-rouser wrote. Youre making a silent statement that youre completely fine with their choices.

Ah yes, nothing quite like an old-fashioned yuletide public shaming.

We do not support the Salvation Army or consider them our partner for this project, they simply linked us to a needy family, the store owners wrote on Facebook. We have nothing to gain here, we just wanted to help a family in need.

As unthinkable as it might be a good number of the pro-LGBT protesters were upset that the donut shop dared to help a family in need during the Christmas season.

To quell the growing controversy, The Holy Donut threw themselves at the mercy of the surging mob.

We take this opportunity to sincerely apologize to anyone that we have offended, the store owners wrote on Facebook. We are an organization which prides itself on our track record of kindness and acceptance of everyone.

The Holy Donut should be commended for helping a family in need and spreading a bit of Christmas cheer.

They should also be commended for make delicious doughnuts.(Ive been privileged to sample their Maple Bacon Maine Potato Donut).

And shame on all of you folks out there for harassing these good people and spreading out-right lies about the Salvation Army. Shame!

No doughnuts for you.

Read the original:
Liberals attack doughnut shop's good deed -- What in the ...

The writer is a political economist.

PAKISTANS liberals ought to be utterly flattered now that a potential prime minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan, has suggested that they are the most dangerous constituency in the country, and that these liberals are so well organised and politically relevant, that they seek blood. These words must sound particularly reassuring to Pakistani liberals, each morning, as they read their English-language newspapers and the many articles and editorials which have been written about and after the Faizabad dharna.

Almost without exception, every newspaper has lamented the fact that Pakistan has lost its purpose and direction, that the non-state actors and right-wing Islamic parties have taken over both political and public spaces, and that the state of Pakistan has capitulated to the demands of such Islamists. Reading such editorials and articles, Pakistani liberals must breathe a huge sigh of relief, and offer thanks, for being recognised as such a powerful political and social entity, at a time when, one presumes, they were thoroughly heartbroken and despondent. Imran Khan has given them hope and much-needed reaffirmation.

The term liberal is much used in the public sphere, but is often misunderstood or misconstrued in its meaning and use. Liberal and liberalism have emerged from a political philosophy which dates back some centuries and encapsulates numerous meanings and connotations in what the terms mean. Liberals, to start out with, were against an absolutist state, against the monarchy, and one can in todays world assume that political liberals are also against the authoritarian government of the military.

Liberals also, on account of being against such absolutist oppression, believed in the will, or sovereignty, of the people, which made them at least democratic, or favouring the representation of the people through individuals who were usually elected. By this minimalist account, Imran Khan and his ally, the Jamaat-i-Islami as well as Maulana Samiul Haq, are also part of the liberal frame, even though they have supported military interventions and military dictators in the past. By this definition of the term, Gen Pervez Musharraf is anything but a liberal in the substantive sense, and is merely a lifestyle-liberal.

Imran Khan has given the liberals hope and much-needed reaffirmation.

It is here where things get complicated. Most people, even trained scholars, end up using the term liberal only in a lifestyle sense, where they think that someone who supported or promoted certain behaviours and lifestyle choices, often supposedly western, would be considered a liberal.

But such simplistic definitions often make matters worse, even when one examines something as straightforward as sartorial choices. For instance, if some women wear jeans or trousers, they would immediately be labelled as liberal, even though, as in many Muslim countries, women wear jeans often with a hijab indicating their religious inclination or cultural beliefs. Many Pakistani women, when they go abroad, do exactly the same. So, getting mixed signals jeans with a hijab makes the declaration of someones lifestyle being liberal quite meaningless. Other examples would only emphasise this point.

Being a liberal in a wider sense brings with it far greater attributes than what one wears or drinks. For example, there are clear demarcations of what a liberal, or increasingly neoliberal, economic policy is, compared to one which is conservative. All political parties, including Imran Khans as well as all Islamic parties, believe in free markets, privatisation, the World Banks good governance, less government involvement in the provision of public goods, all of which are attributes of a neoliberal economic order.

By these standards, Imran Khan and the Jamaat-i-Islami are also liberal, for they do not advocate closed borders, economic nationalism, state ownership of assets, or other indicators supposedly of an illiberal economic policy.

Imran Khan doesnt understand how bechara Pakistans liberals really are in todays world. They give a call on Facebook about some political cause such as about the disappeared, and perhaps five of them turn up at some press club to have their picture taken. They are not like the supporters of the Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah, who braved the rain and sat on the roads in Faizabad for three weeks, nor like the supporters of Imran Khan or Tahir ul Qadri who sang and danced at D-Chowk in Islamabad for four months.

Liberals would never have had the stamina, resources or commitment to last as long. At best, liberals can write op-eds, light candles for some deceased comrade killed by a militant, or now write blogs. Clearly, the political activities of Pakistans liberals, which are supposed to be so dangerous, are limited to Twitter, Facebook and other forms of social media.

They barely have a real political presence, since there is very little differentiating between conservative and awami political parties. These parties have the same economic and social agenda and programme, their representatives bend over backwards trying to appease religious lobbies, they believe that the IMF can bail out Pakistan, and their whole faith rests in CPEC. Occasionally political parties and their representatives might take some positions which are termed liberal in a broad political sense, but these are increasingly infrequent.

Yet, one can understand why Imran Khan considers liberals to be dangerous. For one, they want society to be tolerant of differences, even religious belief, and they would want religious minorities to be equal citizens having equal rights. Some, sadly though not all, liberals might even want equal rights for women in society, while many others want peace in the region supporting better relations with India.

Liberals might even advocate for better and increased public services. But these are just well-meaning desires, and unless liberals represent themselves as organised political actors and entities, not only will they not be dangerous, they will continue to remain completely irrelevant.

The writer is a political economist.

Published in Dawn, December 12th, 2017

More here:
Liberals are dangerous - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

Aaron Martin Strangford wedding by the beach 16th June 2016

Can't thank you guys enough for an outstanding performance, both the band and then Stephen as the DJ were fantastic. We've had constant compliments from our guests, We wish we could do it all over again! Our dance floor was never empty, with everyone dancing into the wee hours! The band were so accommodating and professional even when our meal was running late. ( booking the band while living in New Zealand was never going to be easy but these guys made it very smooth and simple, happily answering any questions we had) Thanks again, Sophie and Aaron.

BA Components Awards Ceremony

I worked with Stephen on the BA Awards in November at the Glenavon Hotel. BA is a kitchen manufacturing company based in Cookstown. They wanted a unique awards celebration to mark their 25th anniversary.

The Liberals were asked to perform, not only as the end of night entertainment, but also to provide music throughout the awards ceremony itself. It was a tightly choreographed schedule which the band had to assist me in devising. It took planning, and additional practice for the band, and they threw themselves into it with enthusiasm and great professionalism.

On the night, their delivery was seamless. The awards creremony was a huge success and the Liberals additional performance at the end of the night provided an energetic, brilliant end to a great night.

I would unreservedly recommend the Liberals. They are talented, dependable and a joy to work with.

If you need any additional information please let me know. Feel free to phone me also if required.

Best regards

Judith RowanPLM EVENT SERVICES

See the article here:
The Liberals band

Aside from testosterone, the military, small businesses, the private sector, attractive women, private property, happily married heterosexuals, and people who refuse to conform to their Utopian-or-else drum circle mentality, there few thingsliberals hate more than being held to the rules theyve set for others. When it happens, they generally react the same way to scream like a teenage girl that theyre a victim.

Liberals found some of their favorite fellow travelers on the business end of the Sword of Damocles theyve been lording over the rest of us for years. Forgive me if I dont give a damn.

Congressman John Conyers was forced to resign in disgrace to stop an ethics investigation from discovering who knows how many more victims of his sexual advances. The Ethic Committee does not investigate former Members, so their inquiry stopped immediately.

Senator Al Franken was forced to resign in disgrace after his 8th accuser came forward. He was angry in announcing his resignation, which will happen at some undetermined point in the future. Democrats forced him out specifically so they could claim the moral high ground, which goes to show that liberals will do the right thingwhen every other option has been exhausted.

Democrats at the Washington Post were quick to congratulate themselves and use Frankens eventual resignation for political purposes, which was the only reason it was done, by declaring that they were the only one of our two great parties with any integrity.

Seems the magic number of accusers is 8, after which that vaunted integrity kicks in.

While those political resignations were orchestrated explicitly to weaponize the concept against Roy Moore, who is his own kind of gross, they werent the only controversy surrounding a liberal this week.

If you were on social media at the start of this week you probably saw some liberal whining about progressive podcaster Sam Seder being fired by MSNBC over a tweet hed send years ago making a joke about Roman Polanski. Seder, host of what you have to assume is the ironically named Majority Report podcast, was a long-time contributor to the Democratic Partys unofficial cable news network and a favorite of the beta-male set.

Seders undoing was a result of a tweet hed sent in 2009, when liberal Hollywood was attempting, yet again, the rehabilitate child-rapist Polanski. In protest, Seder tweeted, Dont care re Polanski, but I hope if my daughter is ever raped it is by an older truly talented man w/a great sense of mise en scene.

The tweet was unearthed and publicized by alt-righters and MSNBC fired Seder within hours.

It was clearly a joke, a bad one, but a joke nonetheless.

Still, I dont care.

This taking quotes out of context game is where liberals live, and has been a weapon used against conservatives for two decades. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and just about everyone who sits behind a microphone or appears on TV and does not spew Democrat-approved talking points has found themselves being smeared by MSNBC and their flying monkey Gestapo army at Media Matters. Its about damn time they got a dose, as small as it was, of their own medicine.

Seders sponsors were targeted on Twitter, which is another favorite tactic of these goose-stepping goons.

That Seder was fired over what was clearly a bogus reason is sad, but its their rules, so who cares?

Liberal journalists, who either fall in line with Media Matters ideology or have remained silent was it was used to chase away sponsors from conservatives, clutched their pearls when the Seder news broke.

MSNBCs own Chris Hayes tweeted, Also, I reiterate my longstanding position that people shouldn't be fired for a tweet, *particularly* one that is obviously being read in manifestly bad faith. He not only must not watch his own network, he doesnt appear to watch his own show.

Seder immediately declared himself a victim of a right-wing smear, as is the standard liberal reaction to being held to their own rules, and tried to raise money off it. Welcome to the club, Sam.

It sucks that anyone would be on the receiving end of a deliberate smear job, where their words are deliberately taken out of context to harm someone for the simple act of having a different opinion on politics, but these are their rules, not ours. They started this game, they weaponized the out-of-context billy club, so to Hell with them.

Unlike Jeffrey Lord, who was fired by CNN for an out of context tweet being lied about by left-wingers, Seder was hired back at MSNBC after 2 days of outrage from liberal journalists. Liberals have no problem with conservatives being railroaded, but they hate it when theyre held to the standards they set for everyone else. They can take comfort in the fact that it only lasts a few days, then all is forgiven.

John Conyers and Al Franken got what they deserved, Sam Seder was screwed (temporarily). Its hard to feel badly for any of them because its clear they will never, ever extend the same courtesy to anyone else.

Finally, please forgive this shameless self-promotional note, but if youre looking for a great vacation option next year you should consider this trip with me and others to Europe to tour World War II landmarks. Spend July 4th on the D-Day beaches, among other amazing sites where the Allies vanquished the Nazis. We can hang out, talk politics, and view history. Its going to be amazing, check it out here.

Continued here:
Liberals Hate Being Held to Their Own Standards - townhall.com