Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

Fedeli on Ontario Liberals’ finance report – My North Bay Now – My North Bay Now

The MPP for Nipissing is questioning the Ontario Liberals math in their quarterly financial report. The report shows that during the first quarter, Ontarios real Gross Domestic Product grew one percent for this year, which is better than the rest of Canada and all the G-7 countries. However Vic Fedeli says something doesnt add up. Fedeli says the Conference Board of Canada says Ontario will see lower growth, the Financial Accountability Officer has concerns about the Liberals economic forecast and so does the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. The Tory finance critic says considering the Liberals have been wrong numerous times in the past, he says with this latest go round, hes ignoring their claims and going with the outside experts. In the report, the Liberals also play up the fact they have balanced the budget which translate into better health care. They say because the budget is balanced, the annual interest the province pays on its total debt remains at $11.6 billion. However Fedeli says the Liberals balanced the budget by using the proceeds from the sale of Hydro One. He adds after the Hydro One money is used up well be back in a deficit and he adds even the FAO has expressed a similar concern. The Liberals also maintain Ontarios real GDP will increase 2.7 percent this year which is higher than the 2.4 percent they forecast earlier.

More here:
Fedeli on Ontario Liberals' finance report - My North Bay Now - My North Bay Now

Ex-Surrey mayor Dianne Watts top pick to lead BC Liberals: poll – Barriere Star Journal

South Surrey-White Rock MP Dianne Watts at a 2013 State of the City address in Surrey. (Black Press files)

Former Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts sits as the favourite to replace Christy Clark as the BC Liberal leader, according to a new survey.

At 39 per cent, the Conservative South Surrey-White Rock MP is nine points ahead of Vancouver-False Creek MLA Sam Sullivan, 11 points ahead of former finance minister Mike de Jong, and 15 points ahead of Richmond-Queensborough MLA Jas Johal.

The figures comes from an Insights West poll published Tuesday.

READ: MP Watts tweets photo from hospital bed

As the former mayor of Surrey, Watts could improve the Liberals fortunes in an area where they lost votes at least in part thanks to the NDPs promises to nix bridge tolls and reconsider the Massey bridge.

Watts also pulled strongly ahead with baby boomers: 49 per cent of them want her as leader ahead of anyone else. Watts has not responded to repeated requests for comment from Black Press.

READ: Surrey BC Liberals look beyond their caucus for next leader

Neither former transportation minister Todd Stone nor former education minister Mike Bernier were memorable to those polled. Only 39 per cent recognized either.

The Liberals are gearing up for their leadership race. The partys executive met in Vancouver on Sunday to work on the leadership election process and appoint a rules committee.

@katslepian

katya.slepian@bpdigital.ca

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Read the original post:
Ex-Surrey mayor Dianne Watts top pick to lead BC Liberals: poll - Barriere Star Journal

Author Mark Lilla on liberals: We’ve been losing for 30 years – Salon

InMark Lillas new book The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics, he argues that the age of identity liberalism must be brought to an end. Its a sentiment that evolved from his highly controversialarticle in The New York Times,published just after Donald Trump was elected president, in which he wrote that movement politics and the celebration of difference have become a disaster for the Democratic Party and left-liberal politics in general. Lilla spoke with Salons Amanda Marcotte about regaining voters and power, and the Democrats adopting a more inclusive message.

On where Democrats get it wrong:

Weve been losing for 30 years, so obviously were doing something very, very wrong, and I think part of it is thinking of the institutional politics as coalition-building. If we think of politics on our side as coalition-building and simply ascending groups, we will not get to the state where we need to, which is to articulate a vision.

And we also have to remember movement politics in this country is happening in the glare of right-wing media. Now, this is a fact of our lives, and we cant wish it away, and we cannot ignore it. If were serious about winning back people, lets say people who voted for Obama and then voted for Trump, and having a message that they might go for, we have to get our act together, and not act like this is just a festival, or its about self-expression.

On moving forward and seizing power on aninstitutional level:

We cannot help the people we care about if we do not seize power back from the Republicans. Its just talk, unless we actually hold power.

Institutional politics is not about speaking truth to power. Thats what movements can do. Its about seizing power to defend the truth, and the place were at now, on our side, I think all of our energies must be devoted to that.

Watch the video for more of our conversation about identity politics.

Continue reading here:
Author Mark Lilla on liberals: We've been losing for 30 years - Salon

Patrick Brown deserves tough questions. Why did the Liberals give him such an easy one? – TVO

The thing is, political attacks are supposed to make life harder for your opponents, not easier. Maybe someone should tell the Ontario Liberals?

This past weekend, the partys Twitter account reminded voters that Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown had been an occasional guest on The Rebel, the far-right website currently embroiled in infighting and recriminations but once known primarily for its rancid Islamophobia, which included suggesting the murders of six men at a Quebec City mosque earlier this year were faked.

Plenty of conservatives have abandoned or disavowed The Rebel since one of its contributors appeared on a far-right white supremacist podcast, and someone at Liberal HQ was either bored on a Saturday or thought itd be worth trying to tie Brown to them.

So yes, Brown appeared on The Rebel, most recently more than a year ago to talk about the Liberal partys fundraising scandal funny, the topic of discussion didnt fit into all those tweets that was so tawdry and indefensible the Liberals were shamed into changing provincial election law. Thats on the public record, and voters are totally within their rights to consider that information and its context when they go to the ballot box next year.

But anyone familiar with relations between Brown and The Rebel over the past year knows things have soured badly and seem unlikely to recover. The website has chastised Brown for being a fake conservative whos gone full Trudeau in advocating a revenue-neutral carbon tax to replace the Liberals cap-and-trade system. Rebel contributors have also made dark insinuations about Muslims infiltrating PC nomination races under Browns watch.

No wonder, then, that Brown was able to easily clear the low bar the Liberals had set for him, tweeting, I deplore intolerance of any kind and in any place, including Rebel. That's why they thoroughly detest me!

The whole point of the make X disavow Y play is to put your enemy between a rock and a hard place. The Liberals put Brown between a pillow and meringue.

All this would be a silly diversion, except for the missed opportunity it represents. Brown has a better chance of being Ontarios next premier than the last three PC leaders did, and hes managed to get there without offering much in the way of serious policy.

There was a welcome exception to that last week in Ottawa, where Brown told the Association of Municipalities of Ontario that, should his party form the next government, it would reform the provinces legal liability rules. Mayors and councils have complained for years that, when it comes to doling out damages, courts treat municipal taxpayers like bottomless wallets. Brown promised a Tory government would change the rules to save money, lower insurance premiums for municipalities, and avoid tax increases.

It sounds neat and tidy, but it isnt: theres still the basic question of who should pay for court-ordered damages, which are calculated based on real harms to real people. Courts struggle to put dollar figures on peoples lives especially lives thatve been irreparably damaged. The biggest payouts are often for young people whove been paralyzed or otherwise disabled in car accidents. How much to award a 17-year-old whos going to need 60 or 70 years of care?

Municipalities probably arent the best suited to bear such damages, but theres also no free lunch: either some other level of government takes the hit, or the province caps the amount of money courts can recover from city councils which would save taxpayers money at the risk of injured people going without.

Its a difficult and multifaceted policy issue that deserves a serious, detailed answer. So far, the Tories have promised wide-ranging consultations and that whatever solution they land on will save money. And thats it.

At this point, the governing party (with one eye on next years polls) would be expected to point out the empty shell of a policy the Leader of the Opposition is trying to get away with, and then lambaste him for being unprepared to lead This Great Province.

Except, whoops, the Liberals also promised to address liability rules once upon a time (2014), and then broke that promise, making them a less than perfect messenger for such an attack.

Patrick Brown, like any other leader of a major political party that could form Ontarios next government, needs to be seriously challenged before the next election. Cute games on Twitter arent going to cut it.

See the article here:
Patrick Brown deserves tough questions. Why did the Liberals give him such an easy one? - TVO

Hate, violence are promoted by liberals, too – STLtoday.com

Perhaps the Post-Dispatch editors and columnist Tony Messenger need to lay aside the rose-colored glasses that only the right promotes hate and violence.

Yes, in an ideal world, racism and hatred would not exist. Unfortunately, this is the real world, and racism and hatred will always exist to some degree. The editors bash President Donald Trump for saying both sides are to blame for the violence in Charlottesville, Va. Peace-loving, tree-hugging liberals would never do that, right?

However, CBS This Morning did investigative fact-checking, and reported on Aug. 16 that counterprotesters did come prepared to fight. Whether the Post-Dispatch, myself, or most of America like it or not, the truth is the truth.

The Post-Dispatch and Messenger also seem to forget or overlook that liberals destroyed public and private property in protests after Trumps election, and that liberals have blocked free speech several times. Whatever happened to the liberal position of I disagree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it? (The Aug. 18 editorial Hate speech is abhorrent. Banning it is even more abhorrent does indicate the position is not quite dead.)

Of course, there is Kathy Griffins disgusting decapitation, and state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal, D-University City, posting that the president should be assassinated. Promoting hatred and violence exists on both sides.

Stuart Clark Bridgeton

Read the original:
Hate, violence are promoted by liberals, too - STLtoday.com