Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

Time for Liberals to take female representation in Parliament seriously, party president Nick Greiner says – ABC Online

Posted August 19, 2017 15:07:11

Federal Liberal Party president Nick Greiner says it is time for the party to "at last" take female representation in Parliament "seriously".

Mr Greiner told delegates at the party's state conference in Tasmania the number of women voting Liberal had dropped since 2001.

"It's actually time to improve the results and the results simply mean having more women in winnable positions," he said.

"I do hope that around Australia the party will at last take this seriously and take it seriously in terms of outcomes."

There are just 18 female Liberal parliamentarians across the two houses of Federal Parliament.

That is despite the party's target of 50 per cent female representation in Parliament by 2025.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's 21-person Coalition Cabinet has five women holding portfolios.

Mr Greiner said he does not support a quota for female representation as that would be "insulting", but he plans on enlisting the help of former senator Helen Kroger to boost the number of women in party ranks.

"To work with each of the state presidents and the state divisions, not just to come up with another report," he said.

"But with a genuinely targeted approach to improving our performance in this area.

"Is it too much to expect or to hope that out of five seats that one might have two female candidates?"

Last year, the Liberal Party's federal executive signed off on a 10-year plan to increase female representation.

It includes a bid to recruit more women at a grassroots level and offer mentoring to those interested in standing for election.

Topics: liberals, political-parties, government-and-politics, women, tas, australia

See the rest here:
Time for Liberals to take female representation in Parliament seriously, party president Nick Greiner says - ABC Online

Liberals woes run deep but the way out is murky – Washington Post

By Arlie Russell Hochschild By Arlie Russell Hochschild August 18 at 2:44 PM

Arlie Russell Hochschilds book, "Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right," is a finalist for the National Book Award.

Arlie Russell Hochschilds latest book is Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right, a finalist for the National Book Award.

The country confronts an extraordinary challenge from the right. President Trumps budget proposes to cut funding for the Environmental Protection Agency by 31 percent, the Department of Education by 13.5 percent and the State Department by 30 percent, while boosting the military by 10 percent. Former adviser Stephen Bannon, a hero of the alt-right (a small, far-right movement that seeks a whites-only state), had whispered in the presidential ear about dismantling the administrative state, and a White House rhetorical campaign continues to delegitimize an independent judiciary and press. But are liberals in any shape to offer a compelling alternative vision? Can the myriad groups under the Democratic tent even work together? These questions have driven Mark Lilla to write his latest book, The Once and Future Liberal.

[The future of the Democratic Party could be written in upcoming gubernatorial race]

A professor of humanities at Columbia, and the author of five books on political philosophy including The Shipwrecked Mind: On Political Reaction, Lilla in his new book issues an important, passionate and highly critical wake-up call to liberals who, he believes, are stuck in the mud. In its early stages, his argument is illuminating but then veers seriously off course before ending up focusing on the right goal. First, he contends, the Democrats have been whipped bigly, as Trump might say, at every level of electoral politics. Second, Lilla believes that liberals havent learned from their failure to appeal to voters. Third, they now have a window of opportunity. But, fourth, though liberals believe they are seizing the moment, they are not, because they are not focusing on elections. If the steady advance of a radicalized Republican Party, over many years and in every branch and at every level of government, should teach liberals anything, Lilla writes, it is the absolute priority of winning elections today.

Resistance isnt enough, Lilla says. Liberals need to join in support of a common set of ideals and policies. Lilla compares the Republican Partys website which features Principles of American Renewal with that of the Democratic Party, one of whose topic areas is People. In that category are women; Hispanics; the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community; the Jewish community, Native Americans in all, 17 separate groups, each with a unique message. Republicans reach out, make coalitions, focus on electoral office, and thats proved successful, Lilla says. If we want to protect black motorists from police abuse, or gay and lesbian couples from harassment on the street, Lilla writes, we need state attorneys general willing to prosecute such cases, and state judges willing to enforce the law. And the only way to make sure we get them is to elect liberal Democratic governors and state legislators who will make the appointments. So far, so good.

Lilla then describes liberalisms double-edged legacy from the New Left of the 1960s. As he puts it, the left spawned identity-based social movements for affirmative action and diversity, feminism, gay liberation that have made this country a more tolerant, more just and more inclusive place than it was fifty years ago. But it also unwittingly shifted the focus of American liberalism ... from commonality to difference. He adds, all too briefly, that whats missing is a cogent analysis of the painful class split in America that was abundantly revealed in our recent election. Again, so far, so good.

Then Lilla wades into stormy waters. Identity politics has launched liberals into a victimhood Olympics, he asserts. Sure, Id say, we have some of that. But, he concludes, given the Republicans rage for destruction, [winning elections] is the only way to guarantee that newly won protections for African-Americans, other minorities, women and gay Americans remain in place. Workshops and university seminars will not do it. Online mobilizing and flash mobs will not do it. Protesting, acting up and acting out will not do it. The age of movement politics is over, at least for now. We need no more marchers. We need more mayors. And governors, and state legislators, and members of Congress. Here I say, wait a minute. Whoa!

What Lilla isnt seeing is that we come to electoral politics in many different ways. Some people come to it through a desire for public service, bypassing social movements altogether. Others join social movements, get stuck in identity silos and ignore elections. This book is for them. But many others like myself were drawn to politics by participating in social movements. When I was in high school, politics seemed very much a male realm. It was through feminism that I learned that I, too, had a voice, could join the conversation, advocate, petition, vote. Again, it was as a civil rights worker in the South that I got a frightening look at the link between race and electoral politics.

[Why the Womens March may be the start of a serious social movement]

We need social movements, and we need to move outward from them. Im reminded of a conversation I had with a young black man who approached me after a talk I gave at the University of California at Berkeley. He referred to a June front-page photo in the New York Times of black Harvard graduate students in caps and gowns at their own black graduation ceremony. On the same page, he saw a photo of a white man above a headline reading Fringe Groups Revel as Protests Turn Violent, whom he guessed not to be a college graduate. I wish some of the black graduates from the top picture could tell the white guy from the bottom picture, Hey, were not leaving you out. Then he added, But if I drive three hours north from Berkeley, I dont feel safe as a black man. The young man felt both a need for a movement and a determination to reach common ground with others beyond it. This view is echoed by leaders such as the Rev. William Barber II, a pastor who spoke at New Yorks Riverside Morning Church on the anniversary of Martin Luther Kings Vietnam speech and who has launched an ecumenical Repairers of the Breach movement. In 2013, he led peaceful Moral Mondays demonstrations at the North Carolina General Assembly to protest restrictions on voting.

Lillas message to liberals is timely and welcome. But he might better advise them: Go on your march. Join the marches of other groups, too. And continue to protest, above all. Then come home and organize that fundraiser for your favorite candidate for governor, the state legislature or Congress.

The Once and Future Liberal

After Identity Politics

By Mark Lilla

Harper. 143 pp. $24.99

Read more here:
Liberals woes run deep but the way out is murky - Washington Post

Liberal Party Jumps On Rebel Media Fallout To Collect Emails, Jab At Tories – Huffington Post Canada

The federal Liberals are using Andrew Scheer's change of heart about The Rebel as an opportunity to data mine and to throw a few jabs at the Tory leader.

The party sent out an email blast to supporters Thursday night calling out the Conservatives for maintaining what it says are "close ties" to the controversial far-right website.

"As Justin Trudeau said this week, we know that Canada is not immune to racist violence and hate. Liberals and all Canadians condemn it in all of its forms," the party said in the email.

"For Andrew Scheer though, this condemnation has been harder to come by with his Conservative Party maintaining close ties with the far-right Rebel Media organization."

On Friday, the Liberals sent out a similar email declaring that 5,000 Canadians had "spoken up" and called on the Tories to cut ties with Rebel Media.

Scheer gave interviews to The Rebel during the Conservative leadership race, as did other candidates and Tory MPs.

But on Thursday, Scheer issued a statement announcing he would be no longer granting interviews to the website, citing their Charlottesville, Va. coverage as the reason.

The Rebel's reporting on the "Unite the Right" rally that descended on the college town was seen by some as sympathetic to white nationalist organizers and speakers.

Scheer said his boycott would continue until The Rebel's "editorial directions" change.

"I am disgusted by the vile comments made by hate groups this past weekend," Scheer told HuffPost Canada in a statement. "I believe there is fine line between reporting the facts and giving those groups a platform."

The Tory leader stopped short of explicitly condemning the outlet, which The Liberals noticed.

"Canadians are deeply concerned that the Conservative Party and the Rebel Media are still struggling to part ways," reads the email blast. "Andrew Scheer has refused to denounce and end all ties with the organization."

It then asks the recipient to add their name email and postal code, too to call on Scheer to cut all ties to The Rebel.

"Tell the Conservative Party what the rest of Canadians already know: Hate has no place in Canadian politics," it states.

The Rebel has been reeling from a sudden implosion of resignations and explosive allegations.

The site's co-founder, Brian Lilley, was the first to announce his departure this week. He said he was concerned about the "harsh tone" the website had taken on certain issues.

National Post columnist and Rebel contributor Barbara Kay followed shortly after. Media news site Canadaland reported that Gavin McInnes, a Rebel host and a Vice Media co-founder, is also leaving the outlet.

Following the Charlottesville violence, the outlet's "commander" Ezra Levant tried to distance himself from the so-called alt-right, an umbrella term used by white nationalist groups motivated by racism, white supremacy, and populism.

Levant himself says the term has become synonymous with "racism, anti-Semitism and tolerance of neo-Nazism.''

He took another step Thursday to address criticisms firing Faith Goldy, a Rebel reporter who had gone to Charlottesville. She was let go because of appearance on a podcast hosted by a neo-Nazi group where Goldy and the hosts mocked Levant's Jewish background.

With files from Ryan Maloney and The Canadian Press

Also On HuffPost:

See the original post here:
Liberal Party Jumps On Rebel Media Fallout To Collect Emails, Jab At Tories - Huffington Post Canada

South Australian Liberals left to fend off rivals as Mount Gambier nightmare continues – ABC Online

Updated August 18, 2017 13:22:37

Being forced to relive your worst nightmare over and over, as a punishment for your sins, is a staple of film and literature the Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Bill Murray in Groundhog Day and then the South Australian Liberal Party's sagas in Mount Gambier.

Thanks to the shock resignation of MP Troy Bell, what should be a blue ribbon seat and a nice neat predictable win for the Liberals has instead turned into the political equivalent of a teenager's bedroom God knows what you'll find there, and do be careful where you step.

Bell is facing multiple charges of theft and dishonestly dealing with documents following an investigation by the state's Independent Commissioner Against Corruption.

Mount Gambier voters have a long history of thumbing their nose at the Liberals' preferred candidates and picking independents.

One senior south-east Liberal has told the ABC it's the spectre of that history that now haunts the party.

"The upshot of this is the Liberal Party is now unprepared in what should be a safe seat," the source said.

"Troy got preselection uncontested for both the 2014 election and the one next March. That means there's no one waiting in the wings to represent the Liberal party in Mount Gambier at short notice."

"Troy had consolidated the seat well and was expected to win comfortably. The Liberal party now cannot assume it will retain the seat of Mount Gambier."

It would be unfair to characterise the Bell situation as an entirely self-inflicted wound, but there's no justification for a generous interpretation of how the Liberals have managed their past affairs in Mount Gambier.

It has contributed to the extraordinary time they have spent wandering the wilderness of opposition.

The independents Mount Gambier voters have chosen have been disaffected Liberals, bruised by the pre-selection process.

It started in 1997, when Rory McEwen lost a pre-selection battle he was widely expected to win.

Still a battle is not the war, and in the state election itself, Mr McEwen won the seat with the help of Labor preferences.

Incidentally, the adjacent south-east seat of MacKillop voted for a conservative independent too.

That left a wound, but there was a big serve of salt just waiting to be rubbed into it.

Mr McEwen won a thumping victory in 2002, standing as a conservative independent.

He then went on to join the Rann Labor government as a minister. Mr McEwen contested the 2006 election, and despite a swing against him, retained the seat.

Mr McEwen resigned in 2010 and the seat was expected to go back to the Liberals.

Except being Mount Gambier, it didn't.

A bruising preselection contest saw Mount Gambier mayor, Steve Perryman, win over another strong contender, the mayor of nearby Grant council, Don Pegler.

By now you've probably guessed the pattern. Mr Pegler, unhappy with the outcome, stood as an independent and won.

Mr Pegler served one term and was defeated by Bell.

Interestingly, Bell had been selected by the Liberals unopposed no nasty preselection battle, or cranky independent, to dog his campaign.

It would be premature to say, once again, the South Australian Liberal Party has managed to snatch a glorious defeat from the jaws of victory.

But the Bell situation unquestionably complicates things.

It's more than a simple distraction of resources and attention to a seat the party should be able to count on. It makes the potential path to power for another independent, or a Nick Xenophon candidate, just a bit easier

The frustrated Liberal couldn't have put it better.

"Now we face that challenge again to fend off independents and a Xenophon candidate. To be back in that position is astonishing."

Topics: states-and-territories, government-and-politics, liberals, state-parliament, law-crime-and-justice, mount-gambier-5290, adelaide-5000, sa

First posted August 18, 2017 12:49:06

View original post here:
South Australian Liberals left to fend off rivals as Mount Gambier nightmare continues - ABC Online

Liberals: I don’t need your protection from a statue – WND.com

I resign! This is the only thing President Trump could say to please the press. There are no words to soothe them, no debates to sway them, because they are dishonest. We do not have a racial problem in America. This is multiculturalism, which separates us, and diversity, which divides us. This is the old separate but equal crowd.

Everyone relax. We are not heading for a civil war unless you mean true Americans getting tired of being manipulated and bullied. Black folks are killing each other in the streets every night, and you want to take down a Confederate monument? Symbolism over Substance is getting psychotic.

Lets back up a step for a reality check. Why should it be illegal to be a racist? What can a racist do to me? Why should it be my business if a racist wanted to walk down the street and express hatred for me? And why on earth should the government make them stop?

Hey, liberals, black folks are NOT the pets of America. You cannot make us sit up and bark by pulling our chains. We are NOT The White Mans Burden, and you are NOT responsible for us. I know you liberals think you are superior but nice, and just want to help the underprivileged slaves be more comfortable in their misery. I know how much you hate me and other independent, free-thinking black men who arrogantly reject your care. Its OK, white liberals, you need not protect me from a statue. I can handle being in the shadow of a monument.

The real racists are those Americans, white and black, who believe I am helpless, defenseless and incapable to stand in the presence of racist white people unless I have my white handlers and black tribal chiefs protecting me. To believe I cannot stand the pressure of being spoken to with hate, to think I cannot survive competing or standing up to mean white people, is condescending, racist and arrogant. Who determines whats mean, hateful, harmful or intolerant? This unnatural fear of others has given us safe spaces, the thought police and weak citizens.

I know what a racist is. One tried to kill me 47 years ago. That attack left me permanently disabled and in constant pain. I have seen the face of real racism, and I know how dangerous racists are. But a racist being a racist is no threat to me. If the racist tries to burn a cross on my lawn, I would not need police protection he would. I am not a helpless man requiring my government mandate you treat me nicely. That would only result in all of us being treated harshly by our government.

I did not protest, demonstrate or write the book Its OK to Leave the Plantation to bring more Americans under the government slave-management system. We should not be better managed; we should be free to hurt each others feelings.

Most of us go about our daily lives around each other with no racial problems. We work together, shop, have lunch, ride the bus and live with each other. All day long we see each other and witness no racial tension. So why, after a full day of seeing the opposite, do we go home, turn in the television and witness a nation we have not recognized all day? Why would we believe the news instead of our own eyes?

Racial tensions only exist on the evening news. You will see reality tomorrow as you go about your day. They want us afraid to speak to each other, distrust the motives of each other and prejudge the character of each other based on the news, instead of our personal experiences with each other.

I know the Confederacy is part of the Southern Culture, and I admit not knowing what that really means. Why would poor white men fight for a system that kept them broke and unemployed? The Civil War was the North against poor white people trying to save the lifestyle of rich white people. With slaves doing most of the work, having most of the jobs, skills and expertise, it seems strange to get so many hard-working white Southerners to support their own poverty. But not understanding it does not make me want to restrict it.

So, Trump has not used media-approved language? It is obviously a hyped-up attempt to continue branding Trump. It is frustrating, but not effective. The general public is not concerned that Trump did not please the press. The general public is upset about the organized attacks on our culture and the make believe issues fueling them.

Mob rule will NOT dictate policy. Gang violence will NOT silence speech! The corrosive, bullying media will NOT shame us. However, you do NOT have freedom of speech at my doorstep. There is no right for you to protest me as a citizen. It is illegal for you to conspire to close down a freeway in protest, keeping me from getting to work. You should be arrested for planning to attack citizens with clubs. Paying someone to burn State and private property is criminal.

The police are hired to protect, enforce and guard over society. Any order to stand down for political reasons should be dealt with as a criminal manner. I call on President Trump to withhold federal funds from municipalities that order police to retreat or simply stand by and watch as citizens are being attack and property is being destroyed. Rioters and looters should be arrested, covicted and sentenced to jail. Civilians should be able to sue organizers for damages, and the funding sources of these groups should be investigated as a criminal organizations.

Fly your Confederate flag, salute your Nazi heroes, and honor your past slave holders. It has no effect on me because we won. WE THE PEOPLE defeated every foe with ideas, principles and force, not by taking down symbols.

Original post:
Liberals: I don't need your protection from a statue - WND.com