Mediaboss Marketing

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

On Monday, the Democrats were really excited about their new slogan, A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages. Widely ridiculed for being idiotic, heres a slogan they could have chosen, which is much more honest about the current liberal agenda:

A Bullys Deal: If You Ever Think For Yourself and Dont Conform, Well Ruin Your Life.

This slogan has been operational for a generation. It is shouted at conservative women, gays and other minorities because, you see, todays Democrats cannot afford to have anyone in any of their protected classes get the idea that they can think for themselves. What would happen should women come to realize conservatives arent out to get them, but maybe, just maybe, actually have the plan to make their lives better?

The latest case in point: attempts to smear and degrade Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Mrs. Sanders, a perfectly lovely woman, was instantly berated by famously tolerant and feminist liberals as she was announced as the new White House press secretary.

Writing for the Daily Beast, a gay man calling himself Ira Madison III, tweeted a homophobic slur about Mrs. Sanders, Butch queen first time in drags at the ball. Lovely, no? This is supposed to be a clever way of insulting Mrs. Sanders by referring to her as a man in a dress. For gays, this is clearly homophobic, transphobic and misogynistic. And yet, this from the same crowd that loves to wear duct tape over their mouths with the motto NOH8 scrawled on it. Got it.

Last night, after I appeared on Fox News Tucker Carlson Tonight followed by White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci condemning the tweet, Madison apologized and deleted it.

But this attack isnt a new one from the gay left, or from liberals in general. Ann Coulter has also been referred to as a man in drag. When I was a gay activist in the 1990s, the misogyny in the gay community was palpable. It has clearly become malignant.

Attacking Mrs. Sanders isnt just the purview of one jerk on the internet. NBCs Saturday Night Live also chimed in. In one sketch, Aidy Bryant playing Mrs. Sanders declared, My father is Mike Huckabee. My mother is a big Southern hamburger. They also had her eating during the sketch.

An attempt at fat-shaming? Why not? With the hatred consuming the left why shouldnt they stop the pretense that theyre decent people?

In May, the NBC comedy show also thought it would be funny to do a skit about Kellyanne Conway. Did they laud the fact that she is the first woman to successfully run a presidential campaign? No. They decided it would be better to portray her as the Glenn Close character in Fatal Attraction. As the Daily Beast put it:

McKinnons Conway tries to seduce Beck Bennetts take on CNNs Jake Tapper. She threatens to kill him with a knife until he agrees to let her back on TV. Moments later, she falls out of a window and appears to die, only to pull her body parts back together again. Casting Conway as the Glenn Close character from Fatal Attraction and depicting her death in such a way was considered sexist, unfair, and even a gift to the administration.

While some may want to engage in some academic debate about comedy or the relevance of Saturday Night Live, the real fact of the matter is this: The gobsmacking hypocrisy of liberals and feminists who strut around still claiming to represent women, gays and minorities while being their worst enemy, has been exposed for all to see.

This isnt about jokes gone wrong, or a mistake made that offended one group or another. This is a strategy meant to send a message to everyone who might dare to stray from liberal orthodoxy: If you do so, we will work to humiliate and destroy you.

Enough is enough. When you lie to your base, take them for granted and ruin their lives, there is an immediate impact on the desire of your voters to come back out and vote for you. Especially if you begin to threaten them by proxy.

A new study by Celinda Lake, a Democratic pollster and researcher, found that 40 million fewer people will vote in 2018 than did so in 2016. The Hill reported:

The study found that among the 40 million Americans expected not to vote in 2018, nearly two-thirds are considered part of the Rising American Electorate a block consisting of millennials, unmarried women and people of color, who account for more than half of the countrys eligible voters.

In other words, its the liberal base that will be staying home. Big league. Even some moderate Republicans have been expecting moderate Democrats to carry them through in 2018, but with a revelation like this, thats not something they should count on.

What are liberals to do? Youve got to keep those who are left in the program. Like a cult, anyone who dares to not pay allegiance to the liberal narrative will be attacked. Smearing high-profile conservative women, gays and people of color is meant to send a message to everyone else: conform or else. Doesnt sound like a Better Deal at all, does it?

Tammy Bruce, author and Fox News contributor, is a radio talk show host.

Visit link:
'Conform or else': Democrats bully conservative women, minorities - Washington Times

Recently on HBO's "Real Time," Bill Maher had this to say about the recent attack on Republican legislators: "We would never really think this would happen on the left. We think of the right as the people who pick up guns and do crazy things like this."

And that's just what they think. Liberals are peaceful and conservatives are violent. Even those who take pride in their political incorrectness repeat it. But you don't have to be an American historian to know how little it holds up to the facts.

Every year on the anniversary of JFK's assassination, media people talk about right-wingers in Dallas. But the real shooter, Lee Harvey Oswald, was a Soviet sympathizer. And Robert Kennedy's killer was a Palestinian radical.

Last year at the Super Bowl, America watched Beyonce's half-time tribute to the Black Panthers, who loved their guns as much as any NRA fanatic, and used them enthusiastically.

The media did everything they could to make us forget about former President Barack Obama's friendship with fellow Chicagoans Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, both members of the bomb-wielding Weather Underground. This month's Puerto Rican Day Parade controversy resurrected the 1970s leftist terrorist group the FALN. Today we have the Antifa, whose black mask image has become an emblem of America 2017.

And just last month, Obama appeared on video at the Songwriters Hall of Fame to help induct Jay-Z, who once wrote these lines in his song "Money, Cash, Hoes":

Money cash hoes money cash chicks what

Sex murder and mayhem romance for the street

Only wife of mines is a life of crime ...

"Jay, you have been inspiring," Obama said, but he didn't mention how the millions of young men who've listened to Jay-Z and other rappers have been affected by lyrics such as: "Now if I kill you I probably do ten in the box / Come down on appeal then I'm killin' your pops" ("Reservoir Dogs").

It takes a strange act of the mind to overlook leftist violence in the American present and recent past. It's as if attributing deep hate to right-leaning people was a drug. An obvious addict is Bill Moyers, the former LBJ operative who's made a career out of sanctimonious exposes of conservative wrath.

Whether it's real (the softball shooter) or make-believe (Kathy Griffin), liberal violence in contemporary America is a fact. It would seem to be a natural focus for Moyers' campaign against political hatred. But at his web site one can only find brief notices of the shooting in Alexandria, Va., that emphasize the bipartisan nature of wrath in the United States, citing another story on "potential incitement of political violence by Democrats and Republicans, the right and the left," as well as a population research finding that "Republicans and Democrats were indistinguishable in their support for political violence."

This all sounds like a cross-political appeal to reason, but in truth, it's an effective way to push the liberal-peace and conservative-violence meme. When a lunatic with right-wing opinions goes on a rampage, it says something about the essence of conservatism. When a lunatic with left-wing opinions acts, it summons forth bipartisan expressions of civility.

Conservative hate is conservative, but liberal hate isn't liberal at all.

Republicans and conservatives should recognize the across-the-divide call for unity as a hustle. The next time a right-wing crazy picks up his gun, the one-sided denunciations of conservative hate will come once more. Liberals pay themselves a compliment when they attribute vice to their adversaries, and they double down on back-patting when they (putatively) rise above politics after one of their own commits violence. Conservatives shouldn't help them do it.

They should instead proclaim that liberalism circa 2017 is not "give peace a chance."

It has a malicious streak, and too many liberals don't just despise President Trump and everyone who voted for him, but also take pleasure in their spite.

Mark Bauerlein is an English professor at Emory University. He wrote this for the Philadelphia Inquirer. Readers may email him at engmb@emory.edu.

Originally posted here:
Mark Bauerlein: Liberals conveniently forget acts of violence on their side - Lompoc Record

Toronto Sun

Liberals, stop the pearl-clutching Toronto Sun It's time the Liberals ended their pearl-clutching about Conservatives criticizing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's $10.5 million deal with Omar Khadr in the U.S. media. This based on allegations by Liberals like Trudeau Principal Secretary Gerald Butts ... CP Champion: 'New' citizenship guide shows Liberals are the copy catsNational Post Justin Trudeau had a choice on Khadr settlement: ScheerToronto Star all 85 news articles »

View post:
Liberals, stop the pearl-clutching - Toronto Sun

Getty Images

BY: Bill McMorris July 26, 2017 1:12 pm

The leader of Pennsylvania's largest labor union said that his union will re-think its close ties to the Democratic Party.

Pennsylvania AFL-CIO President Rick Bloomingdale said the group did a poor job of listening to its members in the recent past, according to WSKG News. Bloomingdale embarked on a "listening tour" across the state following President Donald Trump's surprise victory in the state, which was in part inspired by blue collar workers. Bloomingdale said that his members feel "alienated" by liberalism.

"We may have gotten too close to one party," he said. "We should be for people who are for us, regardless of party label."

The Pennsylvania AFL-CIO worked hard to get Hillary Clinton and Democratic Senate nominee Katie McGinty elected in 2016. The union organized more than 10,000 volunteers and aimed to mobilize 450,000 voters to support the Democratic ticket, according to an October 26 press release. The union also sent out 580,000 mailers to union members and households touting Clinton's candidacy.

"Working people have been leading the fight in Pennsylvania to elect pro-worker candidates like Hillary Clinton and Katie McGinty. The GOTV efforts of the Pennsylvania labor movement in the home stretch will help ensure victory on Election Day," Bloomingdale said in theOctober statement.

After speaking with union rank and file, Bloomingdale said that the union's past strategy may have further alienated members. He said that union leadership plans to do a better job of listening to the concerns of their members, rather than attempting to dictate to them.

"I think we were speaking too much at them, rather than having conversations with them," he said.

Exit polls in Pennsylvania did not ask about union household status, as they did in other states, but a number of factors indicate that Trump appealed to blue collar workers. Trump won big in areas that have most acutely experienced factory closures and the decline in manufacturing, carrying 62 percent in the central region of the state, as well as 54 percent of voters in the west, according to the exit polls. Trump's opposition to free trade agreements also appealed to Pennsylvania votersa position he shares with the AFL-CIO and numerous other labor groups. Trump won 64 percent of voters who felt that international trade "takes away jobs;" those voters made up 53 percent of the electorate.

Continue reading here:
PA AFL-CIO Says Liberals Are Alienating Union Members - Washington Free Beacon

In a series of statements on Twitter, Trump attacked his own attorney general as "VERY weak" on investigating Hillary Clinton. And in claiming Ukraine tried to sabotage the election, Trump wondered, "where is the investigation A.G." Clearly, the president is feeling the heat of the investigation into whether Russia interfered in the 2016 election, and he resents the fact that Sessions, who recused himself from that investigation, can't intervene on his behalf. He likely wants Sessions gone so he can appoint an even bigger sycophant who will help him evade questions he doesn't want to answer and safeguard information he doesn't want to come out.

But Trump can't fire Sessions, at least not without creating a national scandal. Instead, he's apparently decided to publicly berate and humiliate the attorney general until he resigns and Trump can appoint a replacement.

It is a depressing spectacle. But liberals shouldn't be shedding any tears for Sessions. Sessions knew who Donald Trump was when he was running for president, and he liked it. He papered over Trump's racism because it enabled his own; he shrugged off Trump's authoritarian tendencies because he has a few himself.

Sessions was one of Trump's earliest and most enthusiastic supporters. He gladly threw his hand in with an incompetent, unstable candidate who more or less promised to set fire to bedrock American institutions and fundamental norms of politics and democracy. Then Sessions got burned. Boo hoo.

We are at a moment of democratic crisis, with a president whose relationship to a hostile foreign power is under investigation, who is actively trying to stymie that investigation and who remains obsessed with both cable news and his long-since-vanquished opponent, Hillary Clinton.

This same president is now clearly trying push out his attorney general so that he can end an investigation that could end up indicting him or members of his team or his family, a nearly unprecedented abuse of power and breach of public trust. That he does it by insulting the guy on Twitter is a move so vulgar and juvenile it's hard to believe it's coming from a sitting American president.

Observers of this White House are rightly worried about what happens next. In a saner political environment, the Republican Party would refuse to confirm any appointee they weren't confident would carry out a thorough and rigorous investigation into election interference. Unfortunately, we can't trust them to do even that very basic duty -- they confirmed Jeff Sessions, after all, who may have been a part of the potential collusion.

There is a very real fear that, when Sessions inevitably bows to his president's commands and jumps down from his administrative perch like a good lapdog, he will be replaced by someone even less trustworthy and even more obsequious.

But none of that makes Sessions a victim -- at least not of anyone but himself.

Read this article:
Trump has made liberals pity Jeff Sessions - CNN