Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

NDP, Liberals in statistical dead heat as prospect of snap BC election looms: poll – Globalnews.ca

A new poll shows that the result of a snap election in B.C. would be just as close as the outcome of Mays provincialelectionif it were to happen in the next few weeks or months.

The new poll by Ipsos Reid found that support for New Democrats and Liberals has not changed much since last months historically close election. Forty-two per cent of decided voters supported the NDP while 40 per cent backed the Liberals. The Green Party had the support of 15 per cent while two per cent backed other parties.

Most respondents said they would continue to support the party they voted for in Mays election if a snap election were to occur in the coming days. Ninety-four per cent of those who supported the NDP and 93 per cent of Liberal backers said they would vote the same way in an upcoming election.

WATCH:Political panel reaction to BC NDP and Green party alignment

More Green Party supporters seemed to have had a change of heart. Seventy-five per cent of respondents who backed the Greens in last months election said they would do the same in the next election. Thirteen per cent of Green supporters said they would switch their vote to the NDP while 11 per cent would support the Liberals, though those numbers had a small sample size.

The May 9 election ended with the Liberals winning 43 seats, while the NDP took 41 and the Green party secured three. The NDP is proposing a minority New Democrat government propped up by the Greens with 44 seats, compared with 43 for the Liberals, before the Speaker is taken into account.

WATCH:Who was sworn-in to Christy Clarks cabinet?

The narrow results of last months provincial election mean none of the three parties is eager to give up one of their voting members to take on the role of impartial arbiter of the house, and experts say an impasse could send voters back to the polls.

The survey asked respondents their thoughts on what should occur if the BC Liberals do not provide a Speaker, forcing a member of the NDP or Greens to fill the position.

If that were to occur, 41 per cent of those polled said they would prefer to have an NDP minority government supported by the Greens, even if the Speaker needs to vote in a partisan manner to break tie votes while 39 per cent would rather have another election that might produce a more decisive outcome.

With files from The Canadian Press

These are the findings of an Ipsos poll of 802 British Columbians conducted June 8 to 11, 2017. The poll was conducted online via the Ipsos I-Say Panel. These data were statistically weighted by region, age, gender and education to ensure the sample composition reflects that of the actual BC population according to Census data. The precision of Ipsos polls containing online data is measured using a credibility interval. In this case, the overall poll is accurate to within +/- 3.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, had all eligible voters been polled. The credibility interval will be wider among subsets of the population. All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error, and measurement error.

2017Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Read the original:
NDP, Liberals in statistical dead heat as prospect of snap BC election looms: poll - Globalnews.ca

Trump Loves Old School, Tough-On-Crime Policies. So Criminal Justice Liberals Are Going Local. – BuzzFeed News

Politics

What do you do when your progressive vision loses its spotlight from the White House?

Posted on June 13, 2017, 01:07 GMT

John Legend, right, greets New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, left, before an event for the #CLOSErikers campaign on May 8, 2017 in New York.

Its very important to understand that Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions dont actually control everything.

That with nuance added, and with facts to back them up is the new message of criminal justice liberals who just a year ago thought this would be the moment for major legislation and executive action at the federal level.

Now, with President Trump in the White House and Sessions leading the Justice Department, the focus has moved away from Washington.

Over 90% of our prisoners are in the state prisons and local jails, one advocate told me. Changing state laws and changing practices on the local level is going to be where most of the change is anyhow.

Lets face it, of the 2.2 million people who are incarcerated, only a couple hundred thousand are in the federal system, another said.

A third said simply, I think what you do during the Trump administration is that you double down locally.

Those first two advocates are singer John Legend and a longtime adviser to Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, respectively.

The third, Glenn Martin, is the president of JustLeadership USA, a group dedicated to cutting the US correctional population in half by 2030.

Martin spent six years in prison more than two decades ago and is now helping to lead the fight to close New York Citys Rikers Island. Closing the jail became a focus in the wake of multiple groundbreaking news stories examining its conditions and why people are there in the first place and a concerted, ongoing grassroots opposition. The effort to shutter the jail recently picked up backing from NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio.

Martin, who served on the year-long commission whose report recommended closing the jail, was blunt about the reasons for his local focus which was the case even before this past Novembers election.

I never had a lot of hope that Congress was the answer to this, he said in an interview after a student-focused event about closing Rikers that took place at the New School in Manhattan. In fact, it was a bipartisan coalition that got us here; forgive me if Im not inspired by a comeback coalition trying to get us out of this mess.

In this June 18, 2015, photo of the crowded living area in Elmore Correctional Facility in Elmore, Ala.

While Martin is a federal skeptic, ending the mess America has more people in jails and prisons, both in number and percentage, than any other country on the planet was a mission that just last year seemed to be going strongly in these and other advocates direction on the national stage.

In the last months of his presidency, Obama commuted a steady stream of sentences mainly focused on those serving long prison sentences for nonviolent drug-related offenses. A bipartisan coalition on Capitol Hill was pressing for significant criminal sentencing reforms and though Republican leadership was not moving the legislation, a younger generation of lawmakers had expressed openness or even enthusiasm for it. Attorney General Loretta Lynch oversaw significant investigations into numerous police departments and had begun a process of ending the federal governments reliance on private prisons a long-sought aim of liberals. And these promised to be merely the opening salvos in a paradigm-shifting mission: Ending mass incarceration and increasing police accountability had become popular causes for the highest level of public officials, celebrities, and intellectuals in Washington.

That momentum came to a halt in January.

Advocates are facing a very different situation now. Trump wasnt just disinterested in their cause he actively campaigned against it, promising a crackdown on crime and echoing the kind of sentiments popular in the 1980s and early 90s when crime rates were significantly higher. (For Trump, urban centers despite his having lived in one for years remain a bad stereotype of a 1982 inner city.) The naming of Sessions as attorney general was a doubling down of that vision: Sessions likely was the senator whose criminal justice views most closely aligned with Trumps views.

While some remain hopeful about continuing to build federal momentum for sentencing law changes, the reality is that most federal efforts will be aimed at stopping or minimizing Trump and Sessions proposals not advancing their own goals.

What do you do when your progressive vision loses its spotlight from the White House?

Is that a very important bully pulpit that well miss? Of course it is, but you have to kind of play with the cards that youre dealt, said Jarrett, who pointed to the philanthropic community and mayors and governors. And if the fact of the matter is that were not going to get the support that we want from Washington, then lets go and work with a coalition of the willing.

There are, in fact, a handful of areas where advocates see real possibilities: pressing local, even grassroots, efforts to make community change (including through local elections); backing state legislative changes where theyre possible; filing litigation where advocates think its needed; and partnering with business and philanthropists to fund programs that otherwise might not happen.

Its kind of the challenge and the opportunity of federalism, Legend said. We dont have control over the federal government right now, but there are a lot of states that are willing to experiment and reform and really, honestly, to save money. He noted that states have been spending so much on locking people up, they realize its not the best way to spend money.

A little more than 100 days into Trumps time in office and three months into Sessions tenure at the head of the Justice Department, Legend spent 48 hours in New York City laser-focused on making the change that he sees being possible in this new era. It was the kind of hyper-local-but-illustrative trip that, a year ago, might have accompanied a White House tie-in the musician once was routinely included in White House events during the Obama presidency or, alternatively, have been meant to put some pressure on the White House.

For Legend, even when talking about Trump, he is keenly aware of where to steer attention toward something actionable, rather than existential. (We focus on what we can do, work with people that can help us make it happen, and were going out there getting small wins that will add up.)

Fordham University Associate Professor Christina Greer, singer John Legend, and Founder and President of JustLeadershipUSA Glenn Martin, speak at an event for the #CLOSErikers campaign on May 8, 2017 in New York, NY.

He spoke on a Close Rikers panel with Martin on May 8 at the New School in Manhattan, joining Martin, New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, and others to discuss where things stood on their effort, what would happen next, and what those in the audience mainly younger activists could do to make it happen. The two days I spent with him were, in fact, meant to deliver the message that there are local efforts still happening and succeeding.

Mark-Viverito a liberal politician in a city where Trump got less than 20% of the vote revels in the idea of fighting Trump: We cant give in on that narrative and succumb to it. But, in practice, she pointed to the value of local efforts saying, Thats why I believe the Close Rikers campaign is so important, and getting it done quicker [than the 10-year plan proposed currently] is even more important.

The next morning, from a suite in the Mandarin Oriental hotel overlooking Central Park, Legend spoke on the phone to Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards about legislation pending there to reduce the states incarceration rate, which is the highest in the nation.

Legend is active, informed, and attentive enough that its a running conversation with his staff and across issues throughout the morning: He recorded robocalls for Color of Change in support of the Louisiana bill and for the ACLU in support of California legislation aimed at reforming the bail system there. He reviewed an email to be sent out in his name on the Louisiana legislation, making edits on the paper, changing the word solve to improve in the letters assessment of the proposed Louisiana legislations effects on mass incarceration. (I dont want to oversell it.)

In talking with the governor, he pointed out that the legislation already had been watered down from what it was when introduced a change made just before he had gone to Baton Rouge to testify in favor of the bill. I just know that legislation is a tough process, and it takes a lot of negotiation and you dont expect to get everything you ask for. I go into it with that expectation, so I cant be too disappointed when we dont get everything we want, he said of the changes, which eliminated relief for violent offenses, adding, We just keep fighting for it, though.

The Louisiana bills passed, referred to by The Advocate in Baton Rouge as Edwards biggest victory of the legislative session. The California bill, meanwhile, has faced difficulties, although advocates remain hopeful for action on bail policy this session.

I think all of them realize that this stuff isnt free, Legend said of states being open to changes. This comes at a cost, a societal cost and a financial cost, where youre saying, Were going to invest in punishment, rather than things that are more likely to build up the community, and they realize when theyre making decisions about where to spend your money youve got to decide what your priorities are and your values are and your budget reflects what your values are.

Legend, it was clear over his time in New York City, shifts seamlessly between worlds from activists to politicians and lawmakers to wealthy donors, the kinds of people who made up the grassroots-and-corporate coalition refined over the last 10 years in Washington. Its a code-switching reality that he says is a skill that comes, quite simply, because hes lived in those different worlds. He went from a working-class family in a small community thats forgotten about to an Ivy League university (University of Pennsylvania, 99) to his current life as a wealthy person in America with a social justice mindset. I feel like I can speak in multiple languages and to different audiences based on understanding what their point of view is and understanding.

If the activists know what to do keep doing what they would do otherwise the path forward for the liberal business and tech world grappling with a Trump administration oscillating between chaos inside the White House and potentially wide-ranging policy changes is less clear.

Part of Legends New York tour included the Town & Country Philanthropy summit, a day of events held at Hearst Tower and aimed at the wealthy T&C magazine audience. Legend unveiled a new initiative there: Unlocked Futures, an effort to provide funding to entrepreneurs and small business owners previously incarcerated. If the political environment has changed from last year, the coalition hasnt totally: Hes begun with a $500,000 donation from Bank of America, and after the T&C event, he headed to Toro restaurant in Chelsea for an intimate dinner at which he pitched foundations on funding the venture.

This is the benefit of Legends celebrity, something thats been aided by the current social media environment. Legend and his wife, the model Chrissy Teigen both use Twitter to great effect, and have become more relevant as public figures because of it. His Twitter presence and activism is key to his efforts: His primary outlet for his advocacy is #FREEAMERICA a hashtag activism-based effort that aims at changing the way people talk about criminal justice in America.

He is aware, though, of the double-edged sword of his celebrity. It can be powerful and it can be useful, but sometimes I can just get in the way, so I dont want to be in the way, he told me. Its only useful if we can pass laws and make change and change peoples lives. If were not doing that, then theres no point in doing it.

Passing laws and making changes locally is key to keeping the criminal justice movements momentum alive on a national scale. For decades, politicians in both parties largely ran on harsher sentences and aggressive drug policy; persuading politicians that it can be done differently has become an essential piece of the local dynamic.

The notable focus on state and local work isnt just something Legend is doing as Jarrett, who played a key role in federal efforts just a few months ago, acknowledged.

In talking about her post-White House life, Jarrett told me that what she is doing now is traveling around the country talking to state and local elected officials, as well as the private sector, to talk about what everyone else can do with this void that we have, quite frankly, in Washington. (Of course, when she was in the White House, she often was the person taking and responding to criticism about the pace of change from the Obama administration.)

She pointed, specifically, to increasing employment opportunities for people leaving incarceration. One of the biggest problems with our recidivism is because people dont have jobs, she said of work that the Obama White House had backed and that she believes can and should continue even if there isnt White House support. Well, thats something that the private sector can do.

The changed reality is being seen across the criminal justice advocacy world. The morning of the Close Rikers event, for example, two of the ACLUs leading criminal justice lawyers at the national headquarters at the southern tip of Manhattan were doing their own local work.

Teaming up with lawyers in Mississippi, they filed a signifiant lawsuit against Madison County a small county of about 100,000 people alleging that the sheriffs department there is engaged in a decades-old practice of unconstitutional policing aimed at making life more difficult for the 40% of the county that is black.

Its a small little county in Mississippi. Theyve been doing this shit for decades. And they get away with it, and theyre blatant about it, Jeff Robinson, the ALCUs deputy legal director and the head of its Trone Center for Justice and Equality, said a few days after the lawsuit was filed.

They are shocked right now, I guarantee it, that they got sued. Because its like, We always treat these people like this. Theyre just these colored people who dont know any different anyway.

Zeke Edwards, the head of the ACLUs Criminal Law Reform Project, said the lawsuit was one they would have brought regardless of who was in the White House or running the Justice Department. Nonetheless, he acknowledged the difficulties in moving from an administration that was bringing investigations against police departments. If anything, what this DOJ is going to do with their rhetoric and their funding streams is ramp up the opposite.

And the message inside the ACLU is clear: Expect more litigation like this, on the local and state level, meant to continue as before except from outside the government.

There are stark limits, however, to what the ACLU or any similar group can do. Unlike the Justice Department, the ACLU cant just decide to investigate a police department, and, even if the ACLU is taking in untold donations these days, they have concrete financial limits.

Clearly, Edwards said, we cannot fill that void entirely.

But, as everyone from Legend to Jarrett to the ACLU is quick to tell you, there are any number of local and state level issues deserving of attention. And so these advocates, who felt on the verge of sweeping nationwide change, are trying to stay on the verge, and keep pushing things further, chipping away here and there even if that wasnt the path theyd intended to be headed down this summer.

Chris Geidner is the legal editor for BuzzFeed News and is based in Washington, DC. In 2014, Geidner won the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association award for journalist of the year.

Contact Chris Geidner at chris.geidner@buzzfeed.com.

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.

News moves fast. Keep up with the BuzzFeed News daily email!

Great!

You're almost there! Check your inbox and confirm your subscription now!

Visit link:
Trump Loves Old School, Tough-On-Crime Policies. So Criminal Justice Liberals Are Going Local. - BuzzFeed News

Intolerant liberals have a new target: the DUP – Spectator.co.uk (blog)

Memo to London-based liberals: not everyone shares your point of view. Some people brace yourself for this have different opinions to yours. Amazing, I know. But true. So please dial down your hysteria about the DUP. Because I know you think it makes you look super-tolerant to bash the supposed rednecks and religious fruitcakes of Northern Ireland whove never attended a gay wedding or made a donation to Greenpeace, but it of course does the opposite it exposes your own intolerance.

The furyover the DUP is reaching fever pitch. Once it hadbeen revealed that May would be working with the DUP, people were out in force to mock and sneer at these religious fundamentalists and climate-change deniers the greatest thoughtcrime of our era who are antsy about gay marriage and opposed to the legalisation of abortion in Northern Ireland. This party doesnt even believe in dinosaurs, guffawed internet wags, after it was revealed that some DUP members hold creationist views.

Some even took to the streets of Westminster yesterday to rage against the DUP. A few hundred impeccably right-on young people carried placards branding the DUP anti-gay, anti-women, anti-green. (It amazes, and terrifies, me that being critical of the politics of environmentalism is now casually put alongside homophobia and misogyny as an unspeakable evil. Thats pretty fundamentalist too, no?) One protesters comment summed up the flimsiness of the fury. I didnt know who the DUP were, I had to Google them,he said. From Googling a party to railing against it in the space of minutes: the modern mindset summed up.

In cosying up to the assorted bigots that make up the DUP, May has created a situation that echoes The Handmaids Tale, said one columnist. People are sharing memes of May meeting the DUP dressed as one of the women from the Channel 4 production of The Handmaids Tale. Yes, really, they think that because this party isnt pro-choice and doesnt love gay marriage then its basically the Sons of Jacob from Margaret Atwoods dystopian tale, threatening to reduce women to slaves of men.

Everyone needs to calm down. For two reasons. First because the DUPs views are relatively common in Ireland and, I dare say, in many parts of Britain. Look, I know this is inconvenient, and youd prefer it if everyone in the country was a carbon copy of you and your lovely friends, but some people out there are religious. They have traditional views. They think marriage should be between a man and a woman and they think abortion is morally wrong. They arent evil. They arent fundamentalists. They just dont agree with you. And the second reason everyone needs to calm down is because theres not a smidgen of a chance that the DUPs attitudes on something like abortion which is still outlawed in Northern Ireland will spread through Britain courtesy of May and her desperation to hold on to power. Indeed, DUP sources have confirmed that they have no interest in including controversial social issues such as gay marriage or abortion in any deal.

Why has there been a meltdown over the DUP if its social views pose no threat whatsoever to mainland British laws? Because thosepeople always looking for an outlet for theiroutsized sense of moral superiority cannot resist the temptation to pontificate against Others. Against deplorables, in Hillarys words. Against the backward. Against lets not sugar-coat it the inferior. They need this. Its the means through which they assert their moral perfection. Theres an ironically religious bent to it all: my views are next to godliness and those people those climate-change-denying, gay-marriage-questioning heretics must not be allowed to breath the same political air as me.

And all the while we have Labourites like Jeremy Corbyn mixing with Islamist groups that share all these same social views, except in an even more extreme form. Yet the people beating the streets over the DUP say nothing. What a double standard.

Read the original here:
Intolerant liberals have a new target: the DUP - Spectator.co.uk (blog)

The Corner – National Review

Katha Pollitt is sick of hearing that liberals have to be less condescending toward Trump voters.

[H]eres my question: Who is telling the Tea Partiers and Trump voters to empathize with the rest of us? Why is it all one way? Hochschilds subjects have plenty of demeaning preconceptions about liberals and blue-statersthat distant land of hippies, feminazis, and freeloaders of all kinds. Nor do they seem to have much interest in climbing the empathy wall. . .

Pollitt is responding to recent work by Michael Tomasky, Joan Williams, Arlie Russell Hochschild, and many unnamed others. Everyone she names is a liberal writing for the benefit of other liberals. They are offering advice to their fellows about how to win more elections without reconsidering their agendas. And theyre doing it because liberals dont control the White House, the Congress, or most governorships and state legislatures.

Im sure if I searched for it I could find op-eds urging Trump voters to have more empathy for other peoplefor example, empathy for illegal immigrantson moral grounds. (Nobody is asking them to be less condescending. I dont think even someone with Pollitts polemical gifts could build a column around the idea that red-state righties are just as condescending as blue-state progressives; hence the switch to discussing empathy.) But the reason theres not a genre urging red staters to greater empathy for political profit seems obvious enough.

Go here to see the original:
The Corner - National Review

Charlie Daniels: What Would Happen If Liberals Got the World They Wanted Here on Earth? – CNSNews.com

Charlie Daniels: What Would Happen If Liberals Got the World They Wanted Here on Earth?
CNSNews.com
I sometimes wonder how the mainstream media, judicial system, sanctuary cities and liberal politicians would fare in the kind of world they are trying to bring about: a world without borders, a world without morals, a socialist society ruled by an all ...

More:
Charlie Daniels: What Would Happen If Liberals Got the World They Wanted Here on Earth? - CNSNews.com