Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

The new doomsayers taking up arms and preparing for catastrophe: American liberals – Quartz

A month before the 2016 US presidential election, Colin Waugh and his wife bought their first firearm.

Donald Trumps campaign was taking an unprecedented turn, with the candidate baiting gun-rights supporters to exert their influence and suggesting that a loss in November would be evidence of a rigged system. The gun, as Waugh frames it, was a form of insurance in case American democracy dissolved into a quasi-Mad Max society, and liberals became the hunted.

When Trump won, Waugh felt numb. His wife was catatonic. They both feared for their lives. The couple, liberal Mississippians and stalwart Obama supporters, were not the primary targets of the right-wing vitriol directed primarily at Latino immigrants and Muslims during Trumps campaign. But from Waughs liberal perch, seeing the new presidents supporters on the news screaming Well take back our country! and hearing similar sentiments from conservatives in his home state, even from friends, felt like a genuine threat.

For the first time in my life, I realized my own freedom was my own responsibility, says Waugh. I could no longer trust Trump, or Congress, to reassure my rights and liberties would remain in place.

But even though he sought self-sufficiency in his new America, Waugh realized he would need a new community of sorts. So on Nov. 10, 2016, Waugh logged onto Facebook and set up the Liberal Prepper.

As the groups name suggests, the Liberal Preppers 2,500 members are united by two things: their political leanings, and a desire to learn how to prepto learn the various skills and tactics that would help an individual survive catastrophic events within ones community. It was founded with the following disclaimer, penned by Waugh: We welcome all individuals who are center and left of center politically. We do not knowingly accept conservatives, Trump supporters, into this group.

If somebodys a dick, we boot themPrior to accepting members, the groups administrators typically vet requestors for alt-right iconography. According to Kenny Stabler, the current moderator, any anti-liberal users that get past the vetting process usually are ejected not long after their first snowflake comment. If somebodys a dick, we boot them, he says.

Despite their shared politics, members individual reasons for prepping vary. Some fear a Trump-triggered nuclear war; others are worried about economic collapse. Nicole Pilt is a Liberal Prepper who says that the nationalist rhetoric now coursing through Western society fuelled her desire to prep. She says shes worried about the plethora of natural and social disasters that are occurring. Many of the Preppers reasons for joining are underlined by a distrust of governmenta new sentiment for many Democratsand the resulting fear for ones safety.

Trump is a clown, but with the idiot congress we have, I am concerned that well have an economic collapse, says Stabler. The election freaked me out because after all this time, people are still voting Republican. Jobs pay so little and the economy is so fragile. That scares me more than some redneck morons.

Until recently, prepping has primarily been associated with right-wing, second-amendment survivalists. Since the 2016 election, as well as the rise of nationalism and anti-globalist sentiment on both sides of the Atlantic, more folks on the left end of the political spectrum have begun to believe that disaster is impending. In response to this epiphany, Facebook groups such as the Liberal Prepper have gained steam, operating as educational platforms for liberals interested in prepping.

The terms survivalists and preppers are occasionally used interchangeably, but Chad Huddleston, a professor of anthropology at Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville who has studied prepping, believes ideology plays a significant role in distinguishing the two.

Survivalism, he says, is a term largely associated with doomsday conspiracy theorists and right-wing extremists seen from the 1970s to the 1990s, including anti-government militias, fundamentalists, and terrorists. According to Huddleston, historic figures like the Unabomber Ted Kaczynski and Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh continue to be mythologized among some survivalists. More recent incarnations of survivalism include far-right patriot movements like the 3 Percenters, founded in response to Barack Obamas 2008 electoral win, and the Oath Keepers, comprised of both current and former military veterans as well as law-enforcement officials whose stated mission is to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Both organizations have caught the attention of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which lists them as extremist antigovernment groups.

Prepping, on the other hand, is a relatively new term adopted by practitioners who wanted to distance themselves from those radical ideologies. It was meant to be the apolitical version of survivalist, though by now the term has become a bit of a catchall. Nobody wants to call themselves a survivalist because of the baggage, says Huddleston. They call themselves preppers but when you talk to them, you realize theyre [often] old-school, anti-government militias. They just put on a new category.

The genesis event for many nonpartisan preppers, says Huddleston, was Hurricane Katrina in 2005. At the time, both the citizens of New Orleans as well as news-watchers around the nation witnessed the governments fallibility. The Bush administration, it seemed, could not (or would not) react to the disaster with the level of commitment and haste needed, exacerbating the suffering of thousands in the wake of the deadly storm.. The 2008 financial crisis stoked additional fear, as Americans began to see the deep vulnerabilities in the US housing market and the nations financial system.

The Liberal Preppers and others like them may seem fringe-y or unreasonably paranoid at first glance, but prepping is starting to move more and more into the mainstream. On Facebook alone, there are hundreds prepping-focused groups searchable with the phrase Preppers (and plenty of others with Survivalists); some have memberships as large as 60,000.

Over 50% of Silicon Valleys upper class owns hideaway property in either the US or abroad.Some of the countrys most influential people have latched onto the trend. Though they might not consider themselves preppers, Silicon Valleys rich and elite are clearly thinking along the same lines as Waugh and Stabler. Earlier this year, LinkedIn co-founder and venture capitalist Reid Hoffman told the New Yorker that he estimates over 50% of Silicon Valleys upper class owns hideaway property in either the US or abroad (New Zealand is a popular choice among the tech community, with new residents including the likes of Peter Thiel); and Steve Huffman, the co-founder and CEO of Reddit, has said he got LASIK so he wouldnt be burdened by his deficiency come societal collapse. And then, of course, theres SpaceXs Elon Musk, who wants to help humanity populate Mars as fast as possible as an answer to mans inevitable extinction on Earth.

Prepping is not a uniquely US phenomenon, although it has different flavors in different parts of the world. A scale of peoples trust in their [nations] government probably reflects how people prep, Huddleston says. Preppers in Scandinavian countries differ from their Stateside counterparts, predominantly because they wholeheartedly believe their government would eventually save them in a time of danger. According to Huddleston, in that region of the world, preppers focus on surviving disaster in the short-term. Weapons are also not a typical feature of Scandinavian prepping, because there, prepping is less about defending property and person, but rather being able to get away from danger quickly and safely.

Despite the trend, it took Trump and one worried Mississippian to trigger the formation of the first large, out-in-the-open left-leaning community. Of the hundreds of prepper groups on Facebook, there are still only handfuls that outwardly promote themselves as liberal or welcoming of similar politicsand most are offshoots from the Liberal Prepper, which seems to be the biggest left-leaning prepper community to date. It grew rapidly: Stabler says it had only 30 or so members in the early days, then itd jump to 100 or so, then more each time it got a mention in the media.

Many of the more experienced Liberal Preppers members are refugees from other survivalist groups who sought out a more politically like-minded community. Now, they are educating people such as ourselvesliberals, who you never think would prep, says Waugh. Some members have shared seemingly advanced techniques, like how evacuate from ones home without leaving a trail; others offer more rudimentary (but probably more useful) survival skills like fire-starting and water-purification methods. They are helping newbies daily, who are noticing whats going on and think its really scary; who think I want to protect my family regardless of the type of disaster, says Waugh.

Seth Hammond, an outdoorsman now living in Washington state, has been prepping for a decade or so, long before Trump entered the White House. While living in Massachusetts during the Blizzard of 1978, Hammond learned that the government cantand maybe even wontalways help you out. To this day, he remembers the hundreds of New England residents left in freezing temperatures without heat, water, or electricity for over a week. If people ran out of food, they couldnt get groceries for days; Hammond decided it was essential to learn to survive without modern amenities.

Despite his years of prepping, Hammond, too, says he has become wiser since joining the group. But really what amazes Hammond about the Liberal Prepper is the level of respect and open-mindedness maintained in group discussions, compared to other online prepper and survivalist forums. He says that if theres any sort of silver lining to Trumps election for the prepping community, its this: Suddenly there are a lot more like-minded individuals adding new perspectives to these niche discussions. Things that are verboten elsewhereliberals in metropolitan communities who want to learn how to use guns, for exampleare welcome at groups like the Liberal Prepper, which offer the space to ask these questions.

There are not a lot of places where youll get a rational discussion where people can disagree about firearms in America but you can among this group, says Hammond. So its like this dialogue going on between this group of adults who may have different levels of skill sets in the thing theyre trying to figure outbut [are] having [an] adult conversation about the politics around it. Thats an interesting dynamic.

It may seem strange that thousands across the nation are deciding to learn horticulture and how to clean a rifle because they think there might be an economic collapse sometime in the future. But Art Markman, a professor of psychology at the University of Texas-Austin who researches decision-making, says prepping isnt outside the bounds of normal human responses to fear.

Its an extreme reaction on their part, but not an inappropriate oneThere is enough news out there now that can be frightening that its an extreme reaction on their part, but not an inappropriate one, he says. People are forever trying to wrest control over situations that feel beyond their own control or understanding. This might involve focusing on aspects of their lives where they feel they are taking charge, or ascribing responsibility to a higher power, like religion.

The preppers are doing the thing that fits with their belief system that makes sense for taking control over the situation, Markman says. And because it emerges from a deep belief that we just cant trust the institutions around us, it is a rational response to that set of beliefs.

Learning the survival techniques that are core to prepping might even provide long-term health benefits, Markman says.

In the short term, stress can be a good thing: The sudden surge of adrenaline, as well as the increase of cortisol, can help us in situations like potentially violent conflicts. But experiencing stress for a long period of time is damaging. Markman uses the case of a divorce that drags on for six months as an example: the divorcees might self-medicate with alcohol, but a healthier response is to take up projects like learning to play an instrument or remodeling a house, which essentially shelters them from the stress response. He says that for members of the Liberal Prepper, whose long-term stressor is the helplessness they feel about the threat (whether real or not) of apocalyptic war or economic collapse, learning some homesteading techniques might actually help to remove their stressors.

In the long term, Markman says, if prepping becomes this way of life, it keeps the fearful stuff at baybecause as far as youre concerned, unlike everybody else, youre doing something concrete.

According to Stabler, liberals were learning how to ensure their safety in case of a disaster long before Trumps presidency. For years, left-leaning Americans interested in survival practicespicking up outdoor skills, learning how to can and preserve food properly, even taking notes on how to use a gun without hurting ones selflurked on places like the red-hued Survivalist Boards. But they were cautious about their encroachment on right-wing territory, as these discussion boards were not exactly welcoming of liberal perspectives.

[Wed] have to skip past threads where we were either a bunch of vile and horrible liberals, or how were a bunch of pussy snowflakes, says Stabler. A big draw of the Liberal Prepper, he says, is knowing that somewhere on the internet, there is a bit of peaceful alternative where everybodys not a giant dickhole praying for the end of the world. He believes that whether members join because theyre terrified of Trump, or war, or a financial meltdown, what they really get out of the Liberal Prepper is a safe space for liberals to explore a potentially unpopular worldview.

Capitalism is getting more brutal, and war is big business, Stabler says. So probably peoplegoing on the internet, getting educated, understanding a little bit more whats going on, isnt such a bad idea.

The idea of a community where people could learn these sorts of skills from others is what got Stabler to take prepping seriously in the first place. I had plans and a space, some land to go to if it gets ugly in the city, says Stabler. And a group of people with a variety of skills that are able to actually contribute, thats important. So I was more into the community than actual prepping itself.

The community vibe has attracted all sorts of people, some with backgrounds nothing like youd expectlike Zachary, a lawyer and mindfulness instructor in Lexington, Kentucky. Although he says he hasnt committed to purchasing backup water or food supplies just yet, since joining, Zachary (who asked that his full name be withheld) bought some silver and gold on other preppers advice. Its a financial security measure, he says, in case the global stock market crashes, paper money becomes worthless, and mass panic ensues.

Occasionally, Zachary engages in ethics debates with other Liberal Preppers. Recently, he asked whether the group members would be okay shooting another human during a civil war or nuclear holocaust. (He says that the answer is, more often than not, yes.)

Stabler says the group he moderates has not organized any meet-ups in the real world, but over the past few months, Zachary has connected with a handful of members offline, and has guided several through mindfulness sessions over the phone. Some of them [have] been absolutely traumatized, Zachary says. They know somethings bad, that somethings coming, but also the fear is compounded by a world just in agonytheyre afraid.

Preppers and survivalists are detailing their story with a smile.Not everyone is so sympathetic. Richard Mitchell, author of the 2002 book Dancing at Armageddon, an in-depth expos of survivalist culture in America, is skeptical that members of the Liberal Prepper are motivated to accumulate survival gear by a legitimate concern for their safety. Having embedded himself with survivalists for over a dozen years, he believes that fear is not the initial impetus at allthats the materialist narrative. In his eyes, preppers and survivalists are detailing their story with a smile.

Theyre having fun doing this, says Mitchell. Its more than just fun. Its a kind of actualization. He describes a survivalist he interviewed, whose employment involved maintaining the citys sewage system. In his garage, he had stored disinfectant, odor treatment, and iodine treatment, among other chemicals. According to Mitchell, the sanitation expert claimed all of this was for some future crisis, when, inevitably, a terrorist group will fry the citys computers, causing a flooding of the metropolitan community that would leave people to their armpits in shit water, and hell be there ready to fix it.

Mr. Poop was not terrified, says Mitchell. He was very satisfied with his solutions to these problems.

Whether or not Mitchell is right about the underlying motivations behind prepping, the vast majority of preppers are not attracted to the media spotlight, even as their worldview gains more and more mainstream acceptance. Waugh, who appeared on a segment of Fox News Watters World this past March, says he left the Facebook group after receiving death threats from right-wing survivalists for being a liberal doomsday prepper, while the exposure made some members of the Liberal Preppers feel paranoid; others thought that Waugh was just narcissistic. A number of the Liberal Preppers members, including an administrator, declined requests for interviews; one member posted a warning regarding the presence of a Quartz reporter in the group.

Stabler says many in the group keep a low-profile because, if a crisis occurs, a person who reveals their status as a prepper will have unintentionally tipped his hand, saying Heres a grocery list, heres everything I have, and could wind up cornered into sharing his carefully rationed canned-goods with someone who never saw the end coming. Many also want to avoid having to explain to non-preppers why theyve taken up the task of preparing for disastersnobody wants to be called crazy or invite the negative attention that Waugh endured.

Some are ready to fight, though, if it comes to it.

Theyre laughing at us, thinking that were people with no guns, Stabler says of right-wing survivalists. But theres an attitude with some of us who are like, Bitch, bring it. Come see the snowflake.

See the rest here:
The new doomsayers taking up arms and preparing for catastrophe: American liberals - Quartz

Maher to liberals who didn’t vote Clinton: ‘What do you say now?’ – The Hill

HBO's Bill Maher scolded "liberal purists" on Friday night who didn't vote for Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonGOP braces for healthcare blowback at home Warren Buffett: Trump-style tax cut would benefit shareholders How to fix fractured politics? For starters, watch hockey MORE, asking, to those liberals who couldnt bring themselves to vote for Hillary because she was the lesser of two evils quite a bit lesser what do you say now?

"If Hillary was president now, would we be turning the clock back on the one issue for which there is no more time, climate change? Maher asked on "Real Time."

Do you really think if just-as-evil-Hillary had been elected conservatives would now be in control of the Supreme Court as they will for decades? Just wait until the 5-to-4 decisions start rolling in gutting unions, making it harder for minorities to vote, siding with polluters, overturning abortion rights," Maher argued.

"Then maybe youll join me in saying to the liberal purists: 'Go f-k yourselves with the locally grown organic cucumber.'"

Maher also used Trump's election as a cautionary tale to liberal voters to support the party nominee even if that candidate is "an imperfect friend."

"This isnt about reliving the last election or my great love for Clinton, which never was, but this is about winning the next election, said Maher. And that begins with learning the difference between an imperfect friend and a deadly enemy.

Trump and Clinton had the highest unfavorable ratings in Gallup polling history for any two presidential candidates, with the Republican heading into Election Day with only 35 percent approval rating and 62 percent disapproval.

Clinton didn't fare much better, with 40 percent approval and 57 percent disapproving.

Go here to read the rest:
Maher to liberals who didn't vote Clinton: 'What do you say now?' - The Hill

Liberals mock Obamacare repeal with ‘#ThingsJesusNeverSaid … – TheBlaze.com

Following the House successfully voting to repeal Obamacare and replace it with the American Health Care Act, angry Democrats and liberals took to Twitter to mock Republicans with things Jesus never said.

In fact, on Friday and Saturday the hashtag #ThingsJesusNeverSaid was one of the highest trending topics on Twitter worldwide. At first, the hashtag was used to mock Republicans for allegedly removing the pre-existing conditions provision in Obamacare.

But the hashtag quickly devolved into broader criticisms of President Donald Trump and the Republican Party as a whole.

Users criticized the GOP for being against refugees and immigration, for wanting to replace Obamacare with a market-based solution, for advocating tax reform, for wanting to build a wall on the southern U.S.-Mexico border, among other current American political issues.

One user wrote: #ThingsJesusNeverSaid You have a pre-existing condition, I cant cure you.'

Another added: Build that wall #ThingsJesusNeverSaid.

Even a Catholic priest added to the rhetoric: Blessed are those whose mercy extends only to those who are like them. #ThingsJesusNeverSaid.

But the hashtag works both ways, liberals quickly learned.

Conservatives, Republicans and libertarians on Twitter were quick to hit back with some statements of their own, mostly focusing on the fact that Democrats and liberals alike generally advocate for abortion, which many contend is murder.

While others added other issues to the mix:

https://twitter.com/WayneDupreeShow/status/860840482485809153

It must be noted that despite the liberal outrage, the AHCA is not yet law. In fact, the Senate has not even voted on the bill yet, and its expected they will pass a different version of the law, complicating the law making process.

Read more here:
Liberals mock Obamacare repeal with '#ThingsJesusNeverSaid ... - TheBlaze.com

Jon Gerrard eyes Manitoba Liberals’ leadership – CBC.ca

Manitoba Liberal MLA Jon Gerrard is considering running for the party's leadership.

Gerrard, the MLA for River Heights, confirmed to CBC Saturday night he has eyes on the party's leadership race, but wouldn't say if it's a done deal.

"It's under consideration and I'm looking at it very seriously," Gerrard said on the phone from the Liberals' annual general meeting in Brandon, Man.

Gerrard said he wants to make sure he considers all the pros and cons.

"I'm in the process and I'm talking with a lot of people here just to get their feedback, should I run should I not? Feedback has been generally positive, but I haven't made a final decision," he said.

Gerrardserved as the party's leader from 1998 to 2013.

Burrows MLA Cindy Lamoureux is the only candidate to announce a bid for the party's leadership publicly so far.

Rana Bokhari took over the party reins for Gerrard but stepped down after losing the 2011 Manitoba election. Judy Klassen is the party's current interim leader.

Klassen, the MLA for Kewatinook, is the Manitoba Liberals' first female First Nation leader.

The Liberals hold justthree of the 57 seats available in the legislature.

Party memberswill vote for their next leader on Oct. 21.

View post:
Jon Gerrard eyes Manitoba Liberals' leadership - CBC.ca

Why the BC Liberals are sometimes liberal and sometimes not – CBC.ca

If you've lived in British Columbia for your entire life, this article probably isn't for you.

But if you're new to the province, or live elsewhere in Canada, it's a political question you'll inevitably ask: why do people argue over whether the B.C. Liberals are liberals or conservatives?

According toGooglesearch data, the third most common question people ask about the B.C. Liberals is: "Why are conservatives called B.C. Liberals?"and anumber ofcolumns andarticleshave been published on the topic in the last month.

But the reason the B.C. Liberals are an amalgam of people who support the Liberals and Conservatives federally without a fixed ideology in B.C. beyond "free enterprise" has less to do with themand more to do with the NDP.

Because while the names of the parties have changed, B.C. politics have been defined the same way for over 75 years.

"The primary dynamic in B.C. politics goes back to the second World War era," saidDavid Mitchell, a historian who has written multiple books about the province's political history.

The first era of political parties in British Columbia saw the Liberal and Conservative parties trade places in government, much like at the federal level. But when theCo-operative Commonwealth Federation which changed its name to the NDP in 1961 began to rise, the two establishment parties decided to combine forces in a coalition government.

"It was ostensively to have a united war effort, but the reality was the Liberals and Conservatives, the old line parties of that day, bandied together to prevent the CCF ... from forming the government," said Mitchell.

The coalition ruled B.C. from 1941 to 1952, but when itbroke up because of infighting, the Social Credit party under W.A.C. Bennett upended the old order and quickly usurpedthem as the dominant choice for non-NDPsupporters.

Former British Columbia premier Bill Bennett was one of four Social Credit premiers who led B.C. for 36 of 39 years between 1952 and 1991. (The Canadian Press)

"Social Credit then became the small-c coalition of the centre-right,"said Mitchell. "The old Liberals and Conservatives stayed on, but they became minor fringe parties for a couple generations."

First led by W.A.C. Bennett and then by his son Bill, the Social Credit Party ruled B.C. for 36 of the next 39 years.

But by 1991 and with an election looming, the party was mired in scandal, andvoters and businesses who didn't have a home in the NDP began looking for a new option.

"The NDP had come to government in 1991 for the second time, and if not Social Credit, what was going to be the united non-socialist, non-social democratic alternative?" said Mitchell.

Mitchell himself was one 17 MLAs elected under the B.C. Liberal banner in that 1991 election. The formerly fringe party had formally split from the federal organization prior to the election, andbecame the official opposition primarily through the strength of leader Gordon Wilson's campaigning.

WATCH: Gordon Wilson's famous 1991 debate performance

B.C. Elections: 1991: Gordon Wilson's debate triumph3:42

"The Liberals re-emerged as a force in the opposition, but was not yet that vehicle. It took a few years for them to emerge as the single, centre-right alternative," said Mitchell.

It happened over the course of many years for a variety of reasons:the election of Gordon Campbell as leader, the complete collapse of the Social Credit party, and the failure of other options like the Reform Party and Progressive Democratic Alliance to make inroads.

But by 2001 they were the preferred option for all non-NDP voters, and won a historic 77 and 79 seats in B.C.'s legislature.

"The Liberals were anything but Liberal in the large L, centre-left sense ... but it became uniquely in the British Columbia context: necessary to become the single vessel to serve as an alternative to the NDP," said Mitchell.

The party's nameis theLiberals,but they're really the third iteration of what has been the dominant group in B.C. for decades: the sometimes right-wing, sometimes-centrist, always against the NDP, free enterprise party.

It may be why longtime B.C. residents accept the differencewith ease. But it doesn't make it any easier for outsiders to intuitively grasp.

"When people think of Liberals in British Columbia, they need to check their biases about what is a liberal," said Mitchell.

"To be a liberal in B.C. is a very different thing indeed."

Read the rest here:
Why the BC Liberals are sometimes liberal and sometimes not - CBC.ca