Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

After Georgia’s Close Race, Montana Democrats Demand Party’s Attention – New York Times


New York Times
After Georgia's Close Race, Montana Democrats Demand Party's Attention
New York Times
But grass-roots liberals are not about to let party leaders lapse back into traditional red state, blue state assumptions. Instead, the Democrats' enthusiastic base is demanding to compete on terrain that once seemed forbidding, a formula for disputes ...
Georgia race is national therapy session for liberalsNewsday
Trump Bashes Georgia Dem as Liberals Spend Big to Flip Tom Price's SeatFox Business
Liberals fume at Democratic establishment as timid about TrumpThe Providence Journal
Washington Free Beacon -NBCNews.com -Salon
all 1,396 news articles »

See original here:
After Georgia's Close Race, Montana Democrats Demand Party's Attention - New York Times

Kathleen Wynne insists she’s not going anywhere despite concern among Liberal MPPs – Toronto Star

I understand that there is a political story around personal popularity, but thats actually beside the point for me, Premier Kathleen Wynne said firmly. (Ed Clark, chair of the Premier's Advisory Council on Government Assets, is pictured at a 2015 announcement on beer being sold in Ontario grocery stores.) ( MARTA IWANEK / THE CANADIAN PRESS file photo )

A defiant Premier Kathleen Wynne said she is not going anywhere despite concern within the governing Liberals that her unpopularity is hurting the party.

Ive made a decision, with the support of my caucus, to go into the next election, Wynne told reporters at the Childrens Hospital of Eastern in Ottawa on Wednesday.

We have important work still to do. Were on the verge of . . . bringing in a balanced budget for the first time in nearly a decade, she said, referring to Finance Minister Charles Sousas April 27 budget.

That will allow us to do more of the things that are needed in this province, whether its in health care, whether its in infrastructure.

Her comments came in the wake of a front-page Star story on Tuesday that revealed unease within the Liberals because Wynne badly trails Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown and NDP Leader Andrea Horwath in public opinion polls.

The Star revealed that more than a dozen Liberal MPPs are considering not running again in the June 7, 2018 election over concern her numbers will drag them down.

I understand that there is a political story around personal popularity, but thats actually beside the point for me, the premier said firmly.

The point for me is to do the work that I was elected to do with the support of my colleagues, she said, flanked by Attorney General Yasir Naqvi, Community Safety and Correctional Services Minister Marie-France Lalonde, and MPP Nathalie Des Rosiers (Ottawa-Vanier).

Of course, there are political calculations along the way. There always are. Ive been in this office since 2013. We won a majority in 2014 and we have been doing the work that we were elected to do.

Asked why her personal popularity appears to be down the economy is performing well and residential electricity rates are being cut by 25 per cent this year Wynne smiled gamely.

Im going to leave that to the pundits and to the press . . . to analyze.

The Star disclosed that some Grits are worried about continuing organizational challenges in the Ontario Liberal Party.

Within hours of those concerns being aired in print, the Liberals scrambled to announce a candidate for an upcoming byelection in Sault Ste. Marie, former local mayor Debbie Amaroso, and unveiled a new executive director of the party, former political staffer David Clarke.

One senior Liberal admitted the revelations in the Star were a wake-up call for a party that has been in power since October 2003.

To that end, the Grits are touting the skills of campaign co-chairs David Herle, who managed the victorious 2014 effort, deputy premier Deb Matthews, and prominent lawyer Tim Murphy, as well as campaign director Chad Walsh, a rising star in the party.

The Liberals also announced new campaign committees to oversee fundraising, candidate recruitment, the election platform, organization and communications.

Speaking in Toronto, Matthews said Wynne is our best asset.

She is making some really substantial change for our government . . . and her caucus is fully behind her and the party is fully behind her, she said.

You know, we can get distracted by polls . . . so do not write Kathleen Wynne off. Shes a very, very strong leader for us.

The Toronto Star and thestar.com, each property of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, One Yonge Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5E1E6. You can unsubscribe at any time. Please contact us or see our privacy policy for more information.

Read this article:
Kathleen Wynne insists she's not going anywhere despite concern among Liberal MPPs - Toronto Star

Trudeau’s Liberals: A midterm report card – The Globe and Mail

By now, you should have seen enough to decide whether youre inclined to vote for Justin Trudeau in the next election.

With the arrival Thursday of legislation to legalize marijuana use, with two of their four budgets behind them, and with most of the agenda implemented, imminent or abandoned, the Liberals first term has largely taken shape. Should it also be their last? Lets take a look at how the government has performed thus far. Consider this one observers midterm report card.

Mr. Trudeau came to power vowing to admit 25,000 refugees displaced by the Syrian civil war. The rookie government missed the Dec. 31, 2015 deadline, but not by much, and the airlift has been welcomed by most Canadians. Former immigration minister John McCallum also increased the annual intake of immigrants to 300,000, which will help sustain a Canadian population that, were it not for immigration, would otherwise soon be in decline. The jury is still out on how the Liberals are handling refugee claimants crossing the border illegally, but overall this governments immigration and refugee policy deserves high praise.

Margaret Wente: Justin Trudeau's out of touch with the 99 per cent

Praise is also warranted on the trade file. In opposition, the Liberals were lukewarm to the Conservative governments ambitious trade agenda. In government, they became firm supporters, pushing hard and successfully (if the Walloons can be kept onside) to complete the agreement with the European Union. Will they be able to conclude a deal with China, Japan or another major Asia/Pacific nation between now and 2019? If so, the Liberals could count trade as one of their signature achievements.

On the environment, Justin Trudeau promised a new resolve in Canadas efforts to fight global warming. In the end, he simply embraced the targets established by the previous Conservative government. But the Liberals appear determined to meet those targets, and to that end have persuaded most provinces to impose some form of carbon tax. Promise made; promise at least partly kept.

The Liberals also deserve qualified praise for their handling of the health-care file. Their funding broadly follows the targets set by the Harper government, but Health Minister Jane Philpott did find some extra dollars for mental health and home care, which the provinces, for the most part, accepted. Should Ottawa be meddling in how the provinces handle health care? And is the money enough to meet the need? Probably not, in both cases. And the federal/provincial prescription-drug strategy remains more aspiration than reality. But Ms. Philpott can take credit for preventing a federal/provincial impasse on funding.

The Trudeau governments relationship with the military is more problematic. Full marks to Mr. Trudeau for his governments commitment to lead a NATO battle group in Latvia, to deter Russian ambitions. Defence Minister Harjit Sajjans biggest procurement move was to acquire Boeing Hornets as a stopgap to replace the terminally aged CF-18s, while holding off on a permanent replacement for several more years. It was a controversial decision, but at least it was a decision. On the downside, the Liberals still cant make up their minds whether to commit to a peacekeeping mission in Africa, a defence review has been repeatedly postponed and the shipbuilding program continues to be plagued by delays. A very mixed bag.

Closer to home, Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould skillfully piloted an emotionally charged bill on assisted dying through Parliament. The marijuana legislation is another big, important file that she has kept on top of. But the governments efforts to streamline and modernize the criminal-justice system havent prevented impatient judges from throwing out cases that take too long to come to trial. Delays in appointing judges are making things even worse. The minister has to take responsibility for this serious miscarriage of justice.

People have reason to be disappointed in this governments handling of Indigenous issues. Mr. Trudeaus most impassioned promise was to transform relations with Canadas Indigenous peoples on a nation-to-nation basis. But although funding has increased, nothing transformative has emerged. The inquiry into murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls proceeds at a glacial pace which anyone could have predicted and there is little evidence of accelerated progress in settling land claims, or of progress toward comprehensive education reform, which the Conservatives tried but failed to implement.

But what about the finances, you might reasonably ask. How the government raises and spends taxpayers money is a key metric on how it is judged. From this armchair, the government has little to brag about. The Liberals promised during the election campaign to run modest $10-billion deficits, with the money devoted to renewing infrastructure. Instead, the deficit was $23-billion in the past fiscal year, and is projected to be $28.5-billion in 2017-18, with no end to red ink in sight. A Senate report criticized the governments $186-billion decade-long infrastructure plan for its lack of clarity and co-ordination. The Liberals did implement their promise to make income tax and the child benefit more progressive, punishing the wealthy and rewarding the middle class, and Finance Minister Bill Morneau has earned praise for initiatives that make it easier to recruit foreign talent, raise venture capital and bring innovations to market. Its a one-hand, other-hand file. Mr. Morneau negotiated an enhanced Canada Pension Plan with the provinces: Good. He lowered the retirement age for old-age security: Bad. But its the growing debt that causes this writer the most concern. When will this government keep its promise to balance the budget?

On two files, the Liberals deserve unremitting scorn. We are committed to ensuring that 2015 will be the last federal election conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system, Mr. Trudeau said, over and over again. But when a parliamentary committee urged a move to proportional representation, Mr. Trudeau balked; he also resisted calls for a national referendum on the subject. In February, the government announced it was scrapping its electoral-reform plans. A total fail.

The Liberals promised, as well, to end the conversion of home delivery of mail to community mailboxes. A subsequent study estimated that abandoning conversion would cost $400-million and sink the Crown corporations efforts to stay in the black. A final decision is expected this spring on whether to break the promise or lose the savings. Both choices are lousy. Shame on the Liberals for painting themselves into this corner.

On one vital issue, the jury is still out. Foreign policy under the Trudeau government has broadly cleaved to the principles established by Stephen Harper: a strong commitment to NATO and to free-trade agreements, caution in dealing with trade and human-rights issues in China, and stern disapproval of Russian ambitions in Ukraine and elsewhere in Europe. But the election of Donald Trump as U.S. President changed the game. Keeping the Canada-U.S. border open, successfully renegotiating the North America free-trade agreement and preventing a crippling import tax from applying to Canadian exports are the most important priorities for Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland. Her success or failure could define this government.

Otherwise, not much is likely to change over the next two years, for better or for worse. You may disagree with this report card, but you surely know enough now to come up with one of your own.

Follow John Ibbitson on Twitter: @JohnIbbitson

Go here to see the original:
Trudeau's Liberals: A midterm report card - The Globe and Mail

BC NDP take aim at Liberals, promote strategy to build urgent-care centres – The Globe and Mail

New Democrat Leader John Horgan took aim on Monday at the Liberals failed pledge to match every British Columbian with a family doctor by promoting his partys strategy to build team-based urgent care centres.

The centres would be open evenings and weekends and would allow patients to see the care provider that fits their needs, whether its a doctor, nurse practitioner or counsellor, Horgan said at a campaign stop ahead of the May 9 election.

BC NDP leader promises to address lack of family doctors (The Canadian Press)

Horgan said Christy Clarks Liberals are letting down patients, who are waiting for hours at walk-in clinics or emergency rooms. The NDP said 700,000 people dont have a family doctor, with 200,000 still looking for one.

Its a fundamental right in Canada to access our public health care system. I will defend that to my last breath, Horgan said.

The NDP leader made the promise in Burnaby, flanked by two local residents who cant find a family doctor. Sky Belt said her friend visited walk-in clinics several times for pain and was told she had anxiety before she was finally diagnosed with cancer.

Those months that she spent not having a family doctor have made her situation very critical, Belt said.

The Liberals estimated in 2013 that 200,000 British Columbians didnt have a family doctor. They campaigned in 2010 and 2013 on providing a family doctor to every resident who wanted one by 2015, but conceded two years ago they would not meet their target.

The website for the GP For Me program says 178,000 people who did not have a family doctor were able to get one by 2016. But B.C.s population also grew by 162,600 between 2013 and 2016.

The Liberal platform includes $2.7 billion for new hospitals, 500 additional long-term care beds and 5,500 more hip and knee surgeries.

Campaigning in Campbell River, Clark highlighted her governments record on helping business, such as phasing out the provincial sales tax on electricity that she said would save businesses $160 million a year, including pulp and paper companies on north Vancouver Island.

Vancouver Island has been a stronghold for the NDP but Clark said the island has a successful economic record because of Liberal policies. She said the unemployment rate on the north island is half what it was under the last NDP government.

More people are working and our jobs plan has worked for British Columbia, she said.

Weve supported the private sector in creating thousands of jobs here and I dont think people, whether in the south island, the mid-island or the north island, want to give up that prosperity. We want to keep this going.

Horgans promise was short on details, with no specific number of urgent-care centres an NDP government would build or a cost estimate. He said the party would shift priorities to make room in the existing health budget.

We want to assemble those teams in a cost-effective way, he said.

Later, Horgan visited Coquitlams Riverview Hospital, a shuttered mental-health institution, where he has promised to reopen some residential care facilities. The NDP would also establish a Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions to help people get timely and effective treatment.

Green party Leader Andrew Weaver, who is campaigning on a promise to do politics differently, unveiled his partys platform on democratic reform in Victoria.

He said his party would establish a public watchdog to oversee government advertising and communications, block cabinet ministers from engaging in partisan fundraising, ban corporate, union and out-of-province donations, and place limits on individual contributions that would be in line with current federal limits.

The Liberals, and to a lesser extent the NDP, have faced intense scrutiny over lavish fundraisers and unlimited donations. The NDP has promised to ban corporate and union donations if elected, while the Liberals would convene a panel to make recommendations. The Greens banned corporate and union donations in September.

Weaver also promised to introduce proportional representation.

British Columbians have lost trust in their government and rightfully so, he said in a statement. We have a duty to regain that trust and to demonstrate through action that the government is there to serve British Columbians not politicians.

View original post here:
BC NDP take aim at Liberals, promote strategy to build urgent-care centres - The Globe and Mail

Liberals were right: Racism played a larger role in Trump’s win than income and authoritarianism – Salon

What motivated voters most during the 2016 election is still a highly debated topic. The 2016 American National Election Study, released last week, provides insightinto the factors that propelled Donald Trump to victory.

Trump supporters have often been depicted as racist, poor white Americans. But are they actually racist? Are they economically anxious?

This year the American National Election Study included 1,200 participants. The publicly funded study has been conducted for each electionsince 1948 and offers historical perspective. The new study examined key factors involved in the 2016 election.

The Washington Post analyzedthree motivationsfor voters based onthe study: income, authoritarianism and racial attitudes. Here is a recap:

How did voters income affect their decisions?

Traditionally, wealthier voters tend to vote for the Republican candidate whilelow-income voters lean toward the Democratic candidate.

That was not the case for the most recent election, however.

Was authoritarianism much at play?

The Washington Post reported:

Many commentators and social scientists wrote about how much about authoritarianism influenced voters. Authoritarianism, as used by political scientists, isnt the same as fascism; its a psychological disposition in which voters have an aversion to social change and threats to social order. Since respondents might not want to say they fear chaos or are drawn to strong leadership, this disposition is measured by asking voters about the right way to rear children.

The idea is that voters anxious about change and disorder will say its best to encourage children to follow rules. For instance, respondents are asked whether its better when children are considerate (likely more liberal) or well-behaved (likely more authoritarian), or whether they should be self-reliant (likely more liberal) or obedient (likely more authoritarian).

According to the data, authoritarianism did not play a major role for GOP voters in this past election cycle. In fact, Republicanswere slightly less attracted bythe idea of authoritarianism than they had beenin previous elections.

What effect did race have?

The major narrativesurroundingNovembers historic election focused on voters racial attitudes, and for good reason. Trump supporters were relentlessly depicted as racists, and the study confirmed that suspicion.

Since 1988, weve never seen such a clear correspondence between vote choice and racial perceptions, Thomas Wood wrote in his Washington Postanalysis. The biggest movement was among those who voted for the Democrat, who were far less likely to agree with attitudes coded as more racially biased.

The Post concluded, Racial attitudes made a bigger difference in electing Trump than authoritarianism.

The current American National Election Study ultimately served as proof of what many left-wingers have been saying all along.

Original post:
Liberals were right: Racism played a larger role in Trump's win than income and authoritarianism - Salon