Mediaboss Marketing

|

Posted: Mar 25, 2017 12:01 AM

On the morning of March 16, a 14-year old girl was allegedly raped by two illegal aliens in a high school bathroom in Rockville, Maryland. One of the alleged rapists, Henry Sanchez-Milian, is an adult, 18 years old, while the other suspect, Jose O. Montano, is 17-years old. They have been charged with first-degree rape and two counts of first-degree sexual offense for allegedly dragging the young girl into the boys bathroom, sexually assaulting her and forcing her to perform sexual acts.

This incident has shocked the nation and exposed the dangers of open borders and lax immigration enforcement. By allowing millions of illegal aliens into this country, the safety of law abiding Americans has been put at risk. Daily, tragic stories are reported of Americans being victimized by illegal aliens. This case is even more disturbing for the victim is an innocent 14-year old girl.

Conditions are so dire that Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, said to all parents in his state that their children are potentially at risk. He said, I am not sure I can give assurances that their children will be safe. The Governor expressed his outrage that an 18-year old man was in the same class as 13 and 14-year old girls. He said the status of Sanchez-Milian was not known to the Rockville High School parents.

Hogan also condemned the attitude of public school officials in Montgomery County, Maryland who administer Rockville High School. The Governor said that there was a lack of cooperation and a lack of information from the Montgomery County school system.

Another pressing issue involves the countys sanctuary policies which protect illegal aliens. According to Fox News, in 2016, the county disallowed 63 accused illegal alien criminals from being turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials. Montgomery County is among many sanctuary areas in the country which refuse to work with federal immigration authorities to deport illegal immigrants. Hogan said that the sanctuary policies were a big part of the problem.

Regrettably, the message has not been received by Dr. Jack Smith, the Superintendent of the Montgomery County school district. Instead of focusing solely on the plight of the victim and the safety of children in his district, Smith blasted the response from parents and warned against racist, xenophobic calls and emails. He was upset at the anger directed at his office from parents rightly concerned about the well-being of their children. Sadly, the Superintendent placed his focus on maintaining politically correct sanctuary policies instead of taking corrective action in his district.

In the aftermath of the incident, parents staged protests outside Smiths office and expressed their concerns at a public meeting. Not surprisingly, the major broadcast networks ignored the story, with only Fox News giving it significant coverage.

This tragic incident also highlights the problems of coddling immigrants who illegally cross the border. Sanchez-Milian is from Guatemala and was captured by border patrol agents in August of 2016 at Rio Valley Grande, Texas. Instead of being immediately deported, he was detained for 12 days and eventually released. ICE allowed him to fly to Baltimore, Maryland to live with his father. In the fall, he was enrolled at Rockville High School and only a few months later he is accused of brutalizing and raping a 14-year-old girl who will be traumatized for the rest of her life.

At the time of his ICE release, Sanchez-Milian was ordered to appear before an immigration judge; however, after seven months, the hearing has still not occurred. If he had been deported, this travesty would never have occurred.

His attorney, Andrew Jezic, said that Sanchez-Milian was released because the inflow of illegal immigrants is too great for federal authorities to handle. According to Jezic, Theres been so many people that have come through the border that are underage in the last year, so what happened is that immigration just doesnt have the resources to deal with all of these people coming in.

Jezic believes that the massive influx of illegal immigrants has also caused significant delays in scheduling the court hearings. Thus, in the case of Sanchez-Milian, what should have been handled in short order, has taken more than seven months.

This has resulted in not only a delay in justice, but also a horrific act of violence. It is a sad reminder that forceful action in dealing with illegal immigration is essential for the safety of all Americans, especially those who are most vulnerable, our children.

Read the original post:
In Maryland Rape Case, Liberals Adhere to Political Correctness - Townhall

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Those who opposed Walker and Trump should run for office, just like the governor and president did

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

Letter to the editor 1:31 p.m. CT March 25, 2017

GREENLEAF - After reading the opinion section of the March 12 newspaper, I had to smile to myself. First, five out of the six letters were very biased, very liberal. Nothing out of the ordinary for the Press-Gazette. The one opinion from Ryan Radue was spot on. Thank you for printing it, Mr. Editor. Please tell me one thing in Radues letter that should not be the goal in every school in the nation.

Regarding the letters by Charles Frisk, Sally Langan, Randall Pouwels, Paul Bartlett and Noah Reif: All I can say to you liberals is run for public office on your opinions. I know you people will say you have to be rich and powerful to run for office. I say no you dont.

Heres how you do it. First, you need to get your election papers, then get the proper number of signatures. Now you are on the ballot. OK, go out in the public, knock on doors, hold town hall meetings. Ask for money to help pay for your campaign.

Second, you need to run on your liberal ideas and opinions. Tell the public you are for bigger government, more regulation, illegal immigration. Let little insignificant countries boss us around. Please, please, please run for office.

Come to think of it, isnt that what Scott Walker and Donald Trump did?

Denis Vanden Heuvel

Read or Share this story: http://gbpg.net/2ohtDgF

2:35

5:48

2:54

1:10

2:57

1:56

3:30

4:24

1:49

2:26

0) { %>

0) { %>

Read the original:
Liberals: Put your views before voters - Green Bay Press Gazette

The contest changes, but the result remains the same: Jeremy Corbyns preferred candidate defeated in a parliamentary selection. Afzhal Khan is Labours candidate in the Manchester Gorton by-election and the overwhelming favourite to be the seats next MP.

Although Khan, an MEP, was one of the minority of Labours European MPs to dissent from a letter from the European parliamentary Labour party calling for Jeremy Corbyn to go in the summer of 2016, he backed Andy Burnham and Tom Watson in 2015, and it is widely believed, fairly or unfairly, that Khan had, as one local activist put it, the brains to know which way the wind was blowing rather than being a pukka Corbynite.

For the leaders office, it was a double defeat; their preferred candidate, Sam Wheeler, was kept off the longlist, when the partys Corbynsceptics allied with the partys BAME leadership to draw up an all ethnic minority shortlist, and Yasmine Dar, their back-up option, was narrowly defeated by Khan among members in Manchester Gorton.

But even when the leadership has got its preferred candidate to the contest, they have been defeated. That even happened in Copeland, where the shortlist was drawn up by Corbynites and designed to advantage Rachel Holliday, the leaders office preferred candidate.

Why does the Labour left keep losing? Supporters combination of bad luck and bad decisions for the defeat.

In Oldham West, where Michael Meacher, a committed supporter of Jeremy Corbyns, was succeeded by Jim McMahon, who voted for Liz Kendall, McMahon was seen to be so far ahead that they had no credible chance of stopping him. Rosena Allin-Khan was a near-perfect candidate to hold the seat of Tooting: a doctor at the local hospital, the seats largest employer, with links to both the Polish and Pakistani communities that make up the seats biggest minority blocs. Gillian Troughton, who won the Copeland selection, is a respected local councillor.

But the leadership has also made bad decisions, some claim. The failure to get a candidate in Manchester Gorton was particularly egregious, as one trade unionist puts it: We all knew that Gerald was not going to make it [until 2020], they had a local boy with good connections to the trade unions, that contest should have been theirs for the taking. Instead, they lost control of the selection panel because Jeremy Corbyn missed an NEC meeting the NEC is hung at present as the Corbynsceptics sacrificed their majority of one to retain the chair and with it their best chance of taking the seat.

Others close to the leadership point out that for the first year of Corbyns leadership, the leaders office was more preoccupied with the struggle for survival than it was with getting more of its people in. Decisions in by-elections were taken on the hop and often in a way that led to problems later down the line. It made sense to keep Mo Azam, from the partys left, off the shortlist in Oldham West when Labour MPs were worried for their own seats and about the Ukip effect if Labour selected a minority candidate. But that enraged the partys minority politicians and led directly to the all-ethnic-minority shortlist in Manchester Gorton.

They also point out that the party's councillor base, from where many candidates are drawn, is still largely Corbynsceptic, though they hope that this will change in the next round of local government selections. (Councillors must go through a reselection process at every election.)

But the biggest shift has very little to do with the Labour leadership. The big victories for the Labour left in internal battles under Ed Miliband were the result of Unite and the GMB working together. Now they are, for various reasons, at odds and the GMB has proven significantly better at working shortlists and campaigning for its members to become MPs. That helps Corbynsceptics. The reason why so many of the unions supported Jeremy the first time, one senior Corbynite argues, Is they wanted to move the Labour party a little bit to the left. They didnt want a socialist transformation of the Labour party. And actually if you look at the people getting selected they are not Corbynites, but they are not Blairites either, and thats what the unions wanted.

Regardless of why, it means that, two years into Corbyns leadership, the Labour left finds itself smaller in parliament than it was at the beginning.

View original post here:
Europe's elections show why liberals should avoid fatalism - New Statesman

Speaking in the House of Commons, Britains Prime Minister Theresa May solemnly listed the diverse nationalities of those injured in Wednesdays lone wolf attack in London, underlining the global nature of the British capital and its diversity. She emphasized the attacker was British-born.

But some British nationalists and nativists have been quick to blame whole communities for the attack, accusing migrants and liberals for having created the conditions for Islamist terrorism.

Two narratives are being fought over in newspapers and social media following the attack that left four dead and 40 injured. One emphasizing the importance of unity and embracing plurality, the other tarring foreigners as the threat and blaming migrants and freedom of movement in the European Union for terrorism.

In addition to 12 Britons admitted to hospital, we know the victims include three French children, two Romanians, four South Koreans, one German, one Pole, one Irish, one Chinese, one Italian, one American and two Greeks, May told a subdued House of Commons.

A terrorist came to the place where people of all nationalities and cultures gather to celebrate what it means to be free. And he took out his rage indiscriminately against innocent men, women and children, said May.

WATCH: May addresses House of Commons

We are united by our humanity, responded Britains main opposition leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

But shortly after the exchanges between lawmakers emphasizing the importance of diversity, Nigel Farage, one of Britains leading Brexiters, struck a different tone.

Despite May confirming police believe the assailant was British born, Farage used the London attack to blame politicians who embrace multiculturalism and lambasted immigration mainly from the Middle East for inviting in terrorism.

FILE - Former UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage gestures during an interview with The Associated Press in London, Nov. 29, 2016.

Weve made some terrible mistakes in this country, and it really started with the election of Tony Blair back in 1997, who said he wanted to build a multicultural Britain, said Farage, the former leader of Britains UK Independence Party.

The problem with multiculturalism is that it leads to divided communities ... We have now a fifth column living inside these European countries. I do actually think that the moment has come for us to actually point the blame. What these politicians have done in the space of just 15 years may well affect the way we live in this country over the next 100 years, he added.

Defend 'our culture'

Katie Hopkins, a TV personality and newspaper columnist, was more scathing, arguing the English must defend our culture. London is a city so desperate to be seen as tolerant ... Liberals convince themselves multiculturalism works because we all die together, too, she wrote in a column for the right-wing tabloid the Daily Mail just hours after the attack.

She added, "This place is just like Sweden. Terrified of admitting the truth about the threat we face, about the horrors committed by the migrants we failed to deter, because to admit that we are sinking, and fast, would be to admit that everything the liberals believe is wrong. That multiculturalism has not worked.

In Birmingham, the Midlands city that saw law-enforcement raids late Wednesday on the homes of people suspected of being connected in some way to the London attacker, locals fear they will be tarred as terrorists and there will be a backlash.

Muslim anxiety

Britain's top counterterror officer, Mark Rowley, has acknowledged that Muslim communities "will feel anxious at this time", but has said police will work with community leaders to ensure protection. Birmingham is home to large South Asian and Muslim communities, and last year hosted Europe's largest celebrations for the Eid festival, a major Muslim holiday.

Police outside a property in Birmingham, England, March 23, 2017, following an attack on Wednesday in London.

Thursday, local police assisted Birminghams Central Mosque in distributing more than 50,000 copies of a booklet explaining the Muslim faith, entitled Terrorism Is Not Islam, to schools and shops.

Mosque chairman, Mohammed Afzal, said the attacker's motives had nothing to do with true Islam. Whoever the attacker is and whatever the cause may be, nothing justifies taking lives of innocent people, which is completely against the good of humanity," he said. "We call upon those that may have even a shred of sympathy for the like-minded terrorists to shake their conscience and realize that such acts are the work of evil and not the work of God-fearing people.

David Aaronovitch, an author and broadcaster, believes the attack should not be allowed to trigger a wholesale tarring of Muslim communities in Britain with the terrorist brush.

In his column in The Times he argued it is important not to cede political space to the fanatics, the extreme nationalists, the fundamentalists. To always think, despite the temptations just to react.

Armed police officers secure the area near the Houses of Parliament in central London on March 23, 2017 the day after the March 22 terror attack in Westminster claimed at least three lives.

Others, though, are keen to react, determined that a nativist, anti-Islam narrative becomes dominant. Tommy Robinson, a far-right activist, rushed Wednesday to the Houses of Parliament as emergency crews were assisting the wounded and claimed Britain is at war with Muslims and labeled the attack the work of a foreigner. This is the reality. The reality is these people are waging war on us," he said.

Bystanders, and even some reporters, denounced him for what they saw as an opportunistic intervention at the site of an atrocity, one designed to inflame.

Read the original here:
Liberals, Nativists Tussle in Newspapers, Tweets Over Narrative of London Attack - Voice of America

There is, in some precincts on the left, an earnest attempt to understand Trump voters, those strange creatures that are standing by their man, and figure out how the Democrats might win them back.

During the campaign I talked about Donald Democrats and how the billionaires appeal to working-class folks might help him win the election, as he did in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. The Dems used to be the party of the working class, but Trump made a connection that the party of global trade deals and climate change failed to forge.

Democrats often sound patronizing when speaking of Trump votersIts hard to win over voters whom youre insulting, New York Times columnist Nick Kristof wrote last month.

But now theres a counterargument emerging about Trump voters, which can be summarized thusly: Screw em.

This mad-as-hell view has been galvanized by reports that many Trump voters may lose their health insurance if the House version of ObamaCare repeal passes. The liberal gloaters say it serves them right.

From this perspective, those voters are too dumb to vote in their own economic self-interest and theyre probably gone for good. So its better to energize the Bernie Sanders base than to struggle to understand why many blue-collar Americans feel alienated from the Obama/Clinton party.

Frank Rich, the former Times columnist now with New York magazine, makes this argument in ridiculing what he calls Hillbilly Chic.

He questions whether pandering to Trump voters is another counterproductive detour into liberal guilt, self-flagellation, and political correctness. Rather than feeling everyones pain, might the time have at last come for Democrats to weaponize their anger instead of swallowing it?

Rich admits that the party is a wreck, with no power and most of its leaders of Social Security age. But he sees Trump voters as basically synonymous with the GOP:

That makes it all the more a fools errand for Democrats to fudge or abandon their own values to cater to the white-identity politics of the hard-core, often self-sabotaging Trump voters who helped drive the country into a ditch on Election Day. If we are free to loathe Trump, we are free to loathe his most loyal voters, who have put the rest of us at risk.

Sounds like Frank is weaponizing his own anger.

I just dont get the loathing, unless you subscribe to the view that anyone who supports Trump is by definition odious. If the Democrats write off everyone who backed Trump, even if it was because they didnt trust Hillary, arent they making it harder to put together an electoral majority of liberals and minorities?

Salon takes a different tack with a critical piece titled The Smug Style in American Politics. (There are photos of Rachel Maddow, Bill Maher and Keith Olbermann, though they have nothing to do with the article.)

The story by Conor Lynch says the Democratic view is of large numbers of American people voting against their apparent interests because of their ignorance and cultural backwardness.

After decades of watching millions of Americans vote for right-wing charlatans who advocated economic policies that serve the wealthy and screw everyone else, some liberals have basically given up on appealing to these perceived yokels, who seem to care more about criminalizing abortion and hoarding guns than obtaining health are and decent wages. They are dumb, credulous and often intolerant; so why should we progressive, rational, forward-thinking liberals sympathize or try to reason with them? Let them lose their health care; maybe theyll learn something this time around (though we all know they wont).

Lynch concludes that both parties have failed these voters and that cheering as people lose their health insurance may not be the best way to go about this.

Ya think?

We live in a divided country. And when Barack Obama won in 2008, some of those who opposed him tried to marginalize him and vowed to take our country back.

Do some in Obamas party want to do the same thing now? Blame not just the Republican president but the 60 million people who put him in the White House? Isnt that a big, well, smug?

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.

Continue reading here:
Smugness watch: Some liberals say it's okay to hate Trump voters - Fox News