Archive for the ‘Liberals’ Category

The true face of liberalism – Jerusalem Post Israel News

Uber CEOs bland response to the Presidents three months immigration ban has put him in the crosshairs of liberal zealots, who regard themselves as progressive. The same thing happened to Silicon Valleys poster child, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, for not criticizing the ban more resolutely. These bullied dignitaries did not agree with Trump. Their only sin was that they did not chastise him with a torrent of slurs and profanities, as is commonplace these days among the enlightened left.

Before the elections, the press was concerned with the question, What happens if Donald Trump loses? Los Angeles Times reporter Doyle McManus, like many other liberal journalists, did not even consider the possibility that Trump might win, and concluded that after Trumps loss, its hard to imagine that Trump will simply fade away.

But Donald Trump won, and his surprise victory exposed the true face of progressive liberalism in America. There are ample examples of the undemocratic nature of todays American liberalism, such as their latest attempt at stymying the formation of the countrys government. Yet, perhaps the most authentic testimony I have seen came from a student of mine who wrote me about the situation in the Northeast, on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution from liberals and progressives. Below is just some of what my student wrote.

We grew up in this liberal bubble, a fantasy land. Our English classes required we read liberal books that championed the plight of immigrant minorities while condemning the westerner as the perpetual antagonist.

I like to think I have a decent moral compass. I take no pleasure in disagreeing with the trend. A person is terrified to say he is not liberal. Universities and schools raised us to breathe the notion that non-liberals are racist, backwards, white, old, men, and bigots.

Right now, what I see in the liberal-left is the new fascist ideology. They are the least embracing group in this country. Somehow, we have arrived where our society is an eggshell of political correctness. Everything is racist. Jerry Seinfeld made a joke about his friend whose last name is black. He said Black's life matters. It was funny, but Seinfeld was almost crucified for racism. This is a sickness.

I am a progressive. I define progressivism as openness to all opinions, challenging everything. I also see myself as a champion of the oppressed. The oppressed right now are the Trump votersthe people who are not represented by Hollywood, the media, or tech and financial institutions where H-1B visa immigrants have all the good paying jobs.

I'm very alarmed at my generation's insensitivity to those with a different opinion than theirs. Trump is obviously not always right. But the outright temper-tantrum the left and my generation are having right now is a turn-off. They are entitled and SAD!

In the late 1940s, Baal HaSulam, my teachers father and the author of the Sulam (Ladder) commentary on The Zohar, wrote about the inherent problems of democracy in his compilation, The Writings of the Last Generation. According to Baal HaSulam, We should not learn from the modern democracies, as they use various tactics to deceive the constituency. When [voters] grow wiser and understand their [leaders] cunningness, the majority will certainly elect a management according to their spirit. And their [leaders] main tactic is that they first create a good reputation for people and promote them either as wise or as righteous, and then the masses believe and elect them. But a lie does not persist forever.

Moreover, later in the book, Baal HaSulam writes, Reality proves that the step following the ruin of a democratic government is that of Nazis or Fascists. Whenever the democratic government is ruined, a fascist, Nazi regime will inherit it. Indeed, the exposure of the fanaticism of American liberalism proves that Baal HaSulams analysis was dead on. The liberals are showing their true, fascist faces. Ironically, it was acclaimed liberal progressive author and journalist, Nicholas Kristof, who best described the liberal dichotomy in a column he wrote for The New York Times titled, A Confession of Liberal Intolerance. According to Kristof, We progressives could take a brief break from attacking the other side and more broadly incorporate values that we supposedly cherishlike diversityin our own dominions. Today, without proper measures to mend Americas perilous trajectory, the fallouts for the American society and for the world at large could be horrendous.

Establishing Sustainable Pluralism A government whose leaders are in office for a fixed and relatively short term requires certain preconditions in order to succeed. While term limits guarantee that no leader becomes a monarch, they also compel candidates to vie for campaign funds and seek the benefit of their big donors every four years. This inevitably makes lawmakers and leaders hostages in the hands of a powerful few who exact their fees after the election, in complete disregard of the public interest. The inevitable outcome of this skewed system is a parade of puppet presidents who dance to the dictates of their donors, as we have seen for the past several decades. The wealthy elite are the real rulers of the United States; the governmenta reality TV show.

As Baal HaSulam said in the above quote, todays heads of state cannot be elected unless they are advertised like a commodity until the public buys the stories sold about them. In such a state, the president is not elected based on leadership skills, but based on acting skills and amicability. Are these the right criteria for choosing a nations leader?

To elect good leaders, people must determine what they want to see in a leader. If the constituency has the interest of the entire nation at heart, they will elect leaders based on the interest of the entirety of the country. In the case of America, for people to have such a broad view they must care for America, and especially for the American people, all American people.

Lessons from the Past In todays era of extreme self-absorption, the only way to restore stability to the American society is to embrace plurality rather than reject it. If the liver and heart fought over blood because they both need it for survival, we would die. But their complementary functionality guarantees that we have a toxin free flow of blood to the entire body.

Likewise, every person in humanity is important because health and strength are achieved when we unite above our differences, and not when we exhaust ourselves trying to be the last one standing. The constant battle we are fighting with each other is exactly how cancer behaves toward the rest of the body, and we know how this ends for the cancer and for us.

When the ancient Israelites connected above their differences, they managed to build a nation out of millions of separate individuals. Once they pledged to unite as one man with one heart, they were tasked with passing the method for connection to the rest of the world. The Torah defined this task as being a light unto nations because today disunity is darkening peoples lives. When depression, violence, and alienation are engulfing all of humanity, unity is the only possible light at the end of the tunnel, however dim or faint.

In Olat Raiah, the great Rav Kook wrote, Unity that strives to benefit each individual is unsustainable. Even when it seems to grow, it will end in a flame of hatred and war among brothers, since each one is pulling in his own direction. However, unity that derives from recognizing the value of love of others will last and strengthen over time.

Indeed, Israels method for achieving unity can succeed precisely in a state of social disintegration and alienation because it is designed for such a state. It does not dread frictions; it embraces them as tools for achieving greater unity and social cohesion.

My students all over the world carry out this method, which they titled, Integral Education, and prove repeatedly that people of different backgrounds can unite if they are willing to rise above their differences. They need not suppress their views like todays intimidated supporters of the President.

I think that Americas strength and stability are too important to the world for this country to behave recklessly. I think it must reinstate the value of embracing all views. Only when America does this can it begin to cautiously open its gates to immigrants. However, even then it must be done on condition that immigrants also embrace the values of pluralism and unity as the basis of democracy.

In the coming years, the global challenges will increase and intensify. The basis for successful coping with these challenges is unity. If America establishes this, it will succeed. If not, it will end up like Europe. Michael Laitman is a Professor of Ontology, a PhD in Philosophy and Kabbalah, an MSc in Medical Bio-Cybernetics, and was the prime disciple of Kabbalist, Rav Baruch Shalom Ashlag (the RABASH). He has written over 40 books, which have been translated into dozens of languages. Click Here to visit his author page.

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin

Read the rest here:
The true face of liberalism - Jerusalem Post Israel News

Sarah Silverman Leads Hollywood Liberals in a Call for Armed Overthrow – Observer

In a tweet to her 10 million followers late last night, Sarah Silverman famed for plumbing the depths of the toilet for her signature brand of humor is now calling on the military to overthrow the government.

This seditious sentiment has been kicked around by many of my film biz colleagues most of them liberals and many of them fanatic HRC supporters who seem to have their heads exploding scanners style in the wake of the election.

With a distinct lack of hindsight theyre now supporting the notion that military professionals should pull off an Operation Valkyrie and remove the head of the Executive Branch.

What then?

A provisional government calling the shots until new elections can be held? Sorry tried and failed in many a bananas republic and usually whomever emerges from a down and dirty cage match finds the throne and refuses to vacate Im thinking of that marvelous scene from Woody Allens Bananas

Sarah seems to have a savior thing going, positioning herself as Phoenix rising from the now or future ashes of Main Street to save us all.

Im imagining that she was struck by the iconic figure of Marianne in Delacroixs iconic Liberty Leading the People bare breasted, rifle in one hand, French Tri-color in the other rallying the troops in rebellion and musing to herself:

Wow couldnt that be me?

Unfortunately, Silverman is not the only Tinseltown lefty who seems to have forgotten that were a country ruled by laws and a constitution.

Hollywood is a swampish terrain where this sort of thinking is bred, if not encouraged. After all, its a bubble world full of narcissistic actors attended to by retinues of sycophantic agents, publicists (the worst), managers and assorted riff-raff where you can get away with saying just about anything. Except, in my opinion, what she just said.

Unfortunately, Silverman is not the only Tinseltown lefty who seems to have forgotten that were a country ruled by laws and a constitution. Last night during the riot at Berkeley that canceled a planned speech by right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, the filmmaker (and karate champ) Lexi Alexander tweeted Hate speech is not free speech. She said it three times and sadly, was wrong all three times. Then theres Judd Apatow, who directed Trainwreck and This Is 40. He tweeted a warning to right-wingers while the riot was unfolding: This is just the beginning, he promised. He later deleted the tweet, but conservatives looking to express their opinions in public have been put on notice.

These ideasthat only the left can express itself freely and that the military should intervene to make that happenare dangerous to our democracy.

For one thing we have a professional military bound by codes of conduct and honorable intentions. I clearly remember when all my colleagues including myself took to the streets to protest the dishonorable intentions of the Chilean military that couped up against a democratically elected Salvador Allende.

Like Sarah, in the recent election I was a Bernie guy and have spent several decades of film work running down a lefty road that passed even Bernies exit. But I also have a healthy, respect for professional warriors and, by extension, the warrior ethos.

Has Sarah ever really hung out with the soldierly crowd?

Together with Pacific Streets co-founder, Steven Fischler, weve done just that producing a series and individual programs on warrior traditions everything from the Samurai, to the Gurkhas, French Foreign Legion; and, yes, Special Forces. In fact, interestingly, in the late 1990s both Steve and myself were invited to attend the renaming ceremony at the Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg (were still involved in an on-going documentary highlighting the overlooked and secret activities of the so-called SOG units during the Vietnam War).

Ok, Ive laughed sometimes hysterically at Sarahs doody jokes and myriad references to excretory functions. But this latest activist twist is totally insulting to the career military whose ranks are filled with individuals who arent taken with the notion that they should storm the White House.

Perhaps Sarah might get a copy of John Frankenheimers classic 1964 thriller, Seven Days in May, and check out how a military coup in this country might play out.

Joel Sucher is a founder of Pacific Street Films, which has producedI Promise To Remember: The Story Of Frankie Lymon and the TeenagersandFrom Swastika To Jim Crow.

Read more:
Sarah Silverman Leads Hollywood Liberals in a Call for Armed Overthrow - Observer

Navy SEAL convoy seen on video flying ‘unauthorized’ flag. (Hint: Liberals won’t likely salute it.) – TheBlaze.com

A Navy SEAL convoy was seen on video flying a Donald Trump flag on a highway near Louisville, Kentucky, a Navy spokesperson told ABC News.

The clip showing the lead vehicle flying the Trump flag was shot Sunday and left many wondering who the vehicle occupants were and if they were with a military unit or were military surplus, ABC News said.

Now military officials are investigating if the flag-flying equates to misconduct, the network reported.

Defense Department and Navy regulations prescribe flags and pennants that may be displayed as well as the manner of display, Lt. Jacqui Maxwell, a spokesperson for Naval Special Warfare Group 2, told ABC News. The flag shown in the video was unauthorized.

Maxwell added to the network that the convoy consisted of service members assigned to an East Coast-based Naval Special Warfare unit driving vehicles while transiting between two training locations.

Naval Special Warfare Unit is the official Navy term for SEALs, ABC News said.

However, Navy Special Warfare Units consist of various support staff, which means those who were inside the vehicle flying the flag may not be SEALs, Maxwell added to the network.

Maxwell said the unit commander will make a disposition decision as to the appropriate administrative or disciplinary action if its determined that misconduct occurred.

Heres one clip. An occupant in the vehicle from where the video was taken apparently says, Youve got to be kidding me, as it approaches the military vehicle flying the Trump flag:

Continue reading here:
Navy SEAL convoy seen on video flying 'unauthorized' flag. (Hint: Liberals won't likely salute it.) - TheBlaze.com

Liberals To Senate Democrats: (Don’t) Do Your Jobs – NPR

Monday's rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., overflowed the sidewalk and filled the street. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Monday's rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., overflowed the sidewalk and filled the street.

When House and Senate Democrats held a rally Monday night to oppose President Trump's executive order on refugees and immigrants, the crowd wasn't all on their side.

Pockets of, "Do your job!" jeers broke out, as did chants of "Walk the walk."

A vocal wing of Democrats' progressive base is growing increasingly frustrated that the minority party can't seem to do much to stop Trump's agenda. In fact, several progressive activists view the bipartisan votes for Trump Cabinet picks, like Defense Secretary James Mattis, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly and CIA Director Mike Pompeo, as signs that many Democrats are failing to put up a fight.

That's despite contentious confirmation hearings and the Trump White House complaining that it's not getting its nominees through faster. Democrats are hamstrung when it comes to stopping the Cabinet picks. Aside from procedural delays, the elimination of the filibuster (the 60-vote threshold to advance nominees) has meant Democrats are powerless to fully stop Trump's picks unless multiple Republicans oppose them, too.

No Democrat appears immune to the criticism

Even Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren found herself writing a defensive Facebook post after being criticized for voting for Ben Carson's Housing and Urban Development nomination in committee.

And despite taking the unprecedented step of testifying against the fellow senator's nomination in committee, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker has found himself answering Twitter critics demanding to know whether he'll stand up to Sen. Jeff Sessions' nomination as attorney general.

Protesters disrupted an event organized by Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse this weekend, and on Tuesday night, a rally titled "What The F***, Chuck" was scheduled for outside Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's Brooklyn home.

A liberal Tea Party?

In nearly every Senate office, phones are ringing off the hook with pleas to vote no or do more to try to block Trump's picks.

Democrats argue that the bulk of Trump's Cabinet picks are being delayed, and that less controversial nominations, like Mattis', are being treated much differently than lightning-rod Trump picks, like Rep. Tom Price for Health and Human Services secretary or Steve Mnuchin for Treasury.

But that appears to be falling on deaf ears.

A lot of the outreach has been prompted by the Indivisible Guide, an organizing project launched by former Democratic congressional staffers that is aimed at mimicking the successful Tea Party movement, but on the Democratic side.

In the wake of Trump's executive action on immigration and refugees, Indivisible organizers put together a conference call, urging people to ask their senators to do everything they can to walk back Trump's order.

"One thing we want to make clear is, if you've got what you think is just a good, progressive senator, and they've made a nice statement saying they don't support the ban, that's not enough," Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin told the call. "And they can do much more. There are Senate procedural tools available to them that if they chose to implement them, they could slow down the Senate, or even stop all action in the Senate, which will go a long way to actually ending this ban."

Demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court against President Trump and his administration's travel ban. Democrats addressed the crowd, but the protesters are putting pressure on them, too. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court against President Trump and his administration's travel ban. Democrats addressed the crowd, but the protesters are putting pressure on them, too.

Feeling the pressure

The fact is, many Democrats are appalled at the idea of grinding the government to a halt. Talking about the party's tactics Tuesday, Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown made sure to clarify that "there's not a plan to slow-walk or slow things down the way that Mitch McConnell did on darn-near everything" when McConnell was the Republican minority leader.

Still, as base pressure has ramped up, Senate Democrats appear to be changing their tactics. Schumer made waves in the decorum-soaked Senate on Tuesday by voting against Elaine Chao's nomination as transportation secretary. In addition to being a member of multiple previous Republican administrations, she's also married to McConnell.

And Tuesday morning, Brown and other Democrats on the Finance Committee boycotted a meeting, in order to deny a quorum call and block votes for Price and Mnuchin.

That's not a permanent fix for Democrats. The committee will eventually meet, and the two nominees will likely be confirmed.

But unlike Trump's Cabinet, Democrats still do have filibuster power when it comes to Neil Gorsuch, the president's pick for the Supreme Court.

"Make no mistake, Senate Democrats will not simply allow but require an exhaustive, robust, and comprehensive debate on Judge Gorsuch's fitness to be a Supreme Court Justice," Schumer said Tuesday night in a statement.

The real test of whether Democrats are listening to these calls for more hard-line stances? Whether and when the caucus allows for an actual vote on the court nominee.

See more here:
Liberals To Senate Democrats: (Don't) Do Your Jobs - NPR

Joyce tells WA Liberals a One Nation preference deal risks feud with Nationals – The Guardian

Barnaby Joyce says a preference deal between the Liberals and One Nation would lead to another blue in WA. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP

Barnaby Joyce has warned the Western Australian Liberals against giving preferences to One Nation in the upcoming state election because it would spark a political fight with the Nationals.

The warning is a major complication for Colin Barnetts re-election campaign, which would receive a substantial boost from a preference deal with One Nation but governs in Coalition with the Nationals.

On Monday the Herald Sun reported the Liberals Western Australian branch is expected to swap preferences with One Nation, abandoning the principle followed since John Howard established it in 2001 to put the party last.

Earlier on Wednesday, at the National Press Club, Malcolm Turnbull refused to weigh in on the question of a preference deal, saying he would travel to Western Australia to urge people to re-elect Barnett but preference deals were a matter for the state division.

On Wednesday evening, when asked about the potential deal, Joyce told the ABCs Radio National thatll be another blue in WA.

Whatever. Whatever blows your hair back, the deputy prime minister said with feigned disinterest.

In a warning to Barnett, he added: I think your Coalitions going to be a National party and a Liberal party coalition. If you want a coalition with other parties, then thats an interesting call of events.

The Liberals hold 30 seats in WAs 58-seat lower house, so they do not currently rely on the Nationals further seven seats for a majority. But, with large swings against the Barnett government, the Liberals may need both preferences from One Nation and the Coalition with the Nationals in order to survive the 11 March election.

At the press club, Turnbull was asked why the WA Liberal party appeared to be prepared to abandon the principle of putting One Nation last and where One Nation would appear on federal how-to-vote cards. Turnbull said the Liberals worked with all parties in the parliament, including One Nation.

Turnbull said he respected every member and senator. I am not a commentator on the political evolution of One Nation, he replied when asked about Pauline Hansons views.

In May, before the July election that elected Hanson and three other One Nation senators, Turnbull said Hanson was not a welcome presence on the Australian political scene.

On Wednesday reports revealed a WA One Nation candidate, David Archibald, had described single mothers as too lazy to attract and hold a mate in a Quadrant article in 2015.

Hanson has not disendorsed Archibald, despite swiftly dumping two Queensland candidates for statements or publications including that gay people should be treated as patients, that drowned Syrian toddler Alan Kurdi was alive and well and that the Port Arthur massacre was a fabricated incident.

Joyce told Radio National he didnt agree with the comments.

Excerpt from:
Joyce tells WA Liberals a One Nation preference deal risks feud with Nationals - The Guardian