Mediaboss Marketing

Breadcrumb Trail Links

'I have no other choice but to speak up in defence of the people of Sudbury'

By Adrien Berthier

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

My name is Adrien Berthier and I am seeking election as Sudburys Libertarian candidate.

I live and work in Sudbury and owe so much of my personal growth to the people of Sudbury. I own salesacorn.ca and Jeesen. I love the fusion of urban and wilderness that Sudbury offers.

I am seeking election because of the loss of personal freedoms that we have been experiencing over the last couple of years. The knee-jerk reaction to lockdowns deprived people of the right to earn a living, to visit dying or severely ill family members and created an underclass of second-class citizens. It also discriminated against certain members of our society, forcing people to wear masks non-stop the entire day to participate in society despite the health concerns.

What we have lived through is a crime against humanity and our politicians, through lack of backbone, have failed us. Our politicians either kept silent during the human rights abuses occurring around them or worse, they were proudly complicit in the events through which we have lived.

Since our politicians are unwilling to defend the freedoms that our society has historically been built on, I have no other choice but to speak up in defence of the people of Sudbury. If we keep voting for the big three parties, nothing is going to change. Its time to make our votes count and either prevent the big three parties from gaining control or at least send them a message that citizens are not livestock on a farm, that politicians are meant to be our servants and serve the people they represent.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

My top priority would be to prevent the loss of freedom from ever happening again so that our children and youth can know what it is like to live in a free society without fear of what their own government might do to them next.

Our health-care system is completely broken. I say this from my own experiences with health care in this city. Our hospital is clearly too small for the needs of our community, but I do not believe that expanding it and pouring more and more resources into a broken system is going to help.

Its time that we look for creative solutions. We need to put our top minds together to brainstorm new ideas. We could look at freeing up all the health care tax dollars collected for each person and spending that money right here in Sudbury.

We could look at reducing the management burden of our hospital, we could look at adding more private clinics for many procedures, freeing up the burden on the system, but most of all, I would reach out to our nurses and doctors and ask them what needs to be done.

I believe that if Laurentian university is unable to figure out a way to restructure or be self-supporting, then maybe we should be looking toward other options. Paying professors more, reducing management and bureaucracy may help to save Laurentian. All options should be on the table to save the university and continue serving the people of Sudbury.

A French-language university in Sudbury would be great. If tuition can be raised to support such a venture, I would support it.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

The drug problem in Sudbury is heartbreaking and I have watched it grow worse year by year. Although I am not in support of spending taxpayer money on safe injection sites my heart goes out to the people afflicted with addictions.

If the safe injection sites could also be somehow combined with other programs, that would give people hope again and give them a clear plan to move forward with their lives and become productive citizens again. I would be supportive of anyone with addictions that really wants to overcome their situation and is willing to demonstrate their willingness with action.

I would be supportive of completing the widening of Highway 69. The important thing here is to have a plan and to steadily follow it through to the end.

To lower prices like gas prices and other goods, we need to produce more. That means more industry, more small business and more entrepreneurs. By producing more goods and services and supporting local solutions, we can drive inflation rates down.

Reducing the size of the government burden on the taxpayers shoulders and emphasizing private solutions can drive down inflation and increase employment. We need to lower taxes, reduce the number of people employed by government and reduce the amount of red tape and paperwork involved in running small businesses.

Reducing the cost of housing in Sudbury is a key issue that comes down to reducing government fees, and government controls over the housing market. We need landlord rights to protect small landlords rights over their own property. By making private property and investing in housing stock a more attractive option, we would quickly increase inventory and pull pricing down for everyday renters.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Increasing the number of options for tenants would provide not only more choice but also better rates as more and more people compete to invest in housing. Making rents more affordable and bringing up the quality and standards of the rental inventory available would be a win for the poor.

Creating jobs in Sudbury could be done by teaching entrepreneurship to high school students and encouraging entrepreneurs as much as possible. Making Sudbury more self-reliant and innovative would reduce our reliance on government support and encourage more employment.

I would like to see the creation of a charitable foundation in Sudbury to restore the soil and waters of our forests and lakes. Restoring self-sustaining ecologies in Sudbury and bringing back our beautiful wild landscapes would be a good idea.

I am also offering to donate 25 per cent of my MPP salary to the Sudbury Food Bank and am challenging all the other candidates to do the same thing.

Adrien Berthier is the candidate for the Libertarian Party in Sudbury.

sud.editorial@sunmedia.ca

Twitter: @SudburyStar

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Read the original here:
Election file: Lockdowns abused the rights of Sudburians, Libertarian candidate says - The Sudbury Star

The woke wheel is not the only one that the left has been asleep at (With the left asleep at the wheel, the right has surged ahead with its cynical anti-woke narrative, 18 May). During the pandemic, progressives made the huge mistake of ceding the language of freedom to the right. Rather than offer alternatives to policies that systematically favoured the stay-at-home middle class, granted powers to the police that have been picked up in the policing, crime, sentencing and courts bill now belatedly opposed by progressives, and prevented us from being with family members as they drew their last breath, the left went along with it all.

As a result, the word libertarian has been appropriated by small-state liberals. At one time, the left would have fought to recover the word for its own emancipatory project, the bedrock principle of which is that freedom is impossible without the security that can only be provided by the community acting in other-regarding concert. Nothing could be further from the fantasies of the libertarian right, which make a bonfire of the ties that bind people together in mutual aid.

Its time for progressives to bite the bullet and start telling a story of our own, Ellie Mae OHagan writes. Absolutely. Whats life without liberty? is a question that the left has forgotten how to ask. It needs to do so quickly before the freedom train runs away for good.Andrew DobsonValencia, Spain

Ellie Mae OHagan is correct that the left is asleep at the wheel, but her account is one-sided. The backlash of the anti-woke mob was entirely predictable; many people are likely to be less receptive to progressive ideas or to addressing injustices if they have been on the receiving end of current correct ideology for example, that they are inherently racist by virtue of their skin colour or transphobic if they insist on some acknowledgment of biological reality.

All this is exploited by unpleasant sections of the rightwing media and the social media corporations that make their money by highlighting divisions and pitting people against each other. The rabbit hole of identity politics down which the modern left has disappeared is inherently divisive and therefore a gift to the right. Amaryllis RoyTaunton, Somerset

Have an opinion on anything youve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Read more from the original source:
Progressives left behind as the right wages war on woke - The Guardian

Al Cross| Opinion Contributor

Tuesdays primary elections in Kentucky reflected increasing polarization of the two political parties.

The Republican Party kept moving right, with the victories of several candidates who campaigned primarily on cultural issues and against government overreach.

The Democratic Party kept moving left, with the U.S. Senate primary victory of former state Rep. Charles Booker of Louisville, probably the most liberal nominee for major statewide office that Kentucky has ever produced.

Booker vowed on election night, Were gonna blow Rand Paul out, but defeat of the two-term libertarian Republican would be one of the greatest upsets in American political history, given the strong Republican trend in Kentucky.

For Subscribers: 5 takeaways from the 2022 Kentucky primary election. (Hint: The first one is 'money wins')

A more likely impact is that of the wins of seven or so Republican primary candidates who emphasized personal liberty (the major exception being a womans right to an abortion), showing that voters GOP primary voters, at least care less about the status and influence of their state legislators than the lawmakers would like to think.

That was obvious in Northern Kentucky, which saw three of its four-state House committee chairs defeated: Reps. Sal Santoro (Transportation), Ed Massey (Judiciary) and Adam Koenig (Business Organizations and Professions). Respectively, they lost to Marianne Proctor, Steve Rawlings and Steven Doan. One common theme was opposition to Democratic Gov. Andy Beshears pandemic restrictions.

In a region where legislative district lines cut across municipalities and even neighborhoods, the liberty candidates consistent cultural themes may have created a tide that lifted all their boats, former Kentucky secretary of state Trey Grayson of Northern Kentucky said on KETs election-night show (where I was also a panelist).

Northern Kentucky also drove the result in an open state Senate race, in which former senator Gex (jay) Williams of Verona, endorsed by libertarian U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, defeated three more mainstream candidates: well-funded Phyllis Sparks, also of Boone County; and Calen Studler and Mike Templeman of Frankfort.

Williams, who gave up a Senate seat to run for Congress in 1998, is now in an interesting matchup with Teresa Barton of Frankfort, who was unopposed for the Democratic nomination. After serving as Franklin County judge-executive, Barton ran the state Office of Drug Control Policy for Republican Gov. Ernie Fletcher and supported him for re-election, but didnt change parties. She may be Democrats only hope to pick up a state Senate seat, in a newly drawn district that is 5 to 4 Democratic in voter registration but seems clearly Republican in recent voter performance.

Several liberty candidates lost. The biggest failure was Andrew Cooperrider of Lexington, who led protests against Beshears restrictions and petitioned the legislature to impeach him. He lost to Sen. Donald Douglas of Nicholasville, who was propped up financially and legislatively by Republican leaders who didnt want another liberty fire-breather like Sen. Adrienne Southworth of Lawrenceburg in the Senate. Two other impeachment petitioners also lost, to Reps. Samara Heavrin of Leitchfield and Kim King of Harrodsburg.

Kentucky Republican leaders have tried to steer the state party away from the national partys growing fever swamps of conspiracy theories and misinformation; they know that the hundreds of thousands of Kentucky Democrats who joined the GOP officially or unofficially because of Donald Trump may not want to go as far as the liberty candidates and culture warriors would go. Perhaps the best example of that is how the Republican-controlled General Assembly soft-pedaled the pseudo-issue of critical race theory in the last legislative session, passing a bill that only alluded to it.

Still, candidates who campaigned against pandemic restrictions and other alleged government overreach had enough success Tuesday that they may lead Republican candidates for governor to double down on the issue as they run against Beshear next year, even though the governor built his strongly positive rating during the crisis period of the pandemic. The Williams-Barton race could be a strategic indicator of just how far right you can go and still win.

More: Rand Paul and Charles Booker nab US Senate primary wins and will face off in November

Republicans are beginning a crowded and potentially fractious primary for governor, in which the nuances of cultural issues could be decisive. Attorney General Daniel Cameron and Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles are running partly on their active opposition to Beshears pandemic mandates, and former U.N. ambassador Kelly Craft has indicated that she will do likewise if she runs, as expected. The liberty candidates success will surely encourage like-minded Rep. Savannah Maddox of Dry Ridge to run.

As the GOP sorts itself out, opposition to Beshear will be the glue that holds the party together in Kentucky through 2023, Republican consultant and commentator Scott Jennings said on KETs primary coverage. (Jennings says hes neutral in the governors race.) But looking a year ahead, Beshears pandemic-driven approval ratings appear to be holding steady, and what works in Republican primaries will not necessarily work in general elections. Voters in November should give us a clearer picture.

Al Cross, a former Courier Journal political writer, is professor and director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky. He writes this column for the Kentucky Center for Public Service Journalism. Reach him on Twitter @ruralj.

See the original post here:
Al Cross: As primary voters move GOP farther right, will others follow? - Courier Journal

NOW TO COMMITMENT 20- 22... AND THE PRIMARY ELECTION IN KENTUCKY. THE RESULTS ARE RUNNING AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR SCREEN TONIGHT.. BUT A FEW KEY RACES, ARE SETTING UP SOME PIVOTAL CONGRESSIONAL RACES FOR NOVEMBER. W-L-W-T NEWS FIVE ANCH SORTEVEN ALBRITTON.... JOINS US NOW WITH HOW SOME OF THOSE RACES TURNED OUT. MIKE AND SHEREE... WE'LL START WITH THE RACE FOR U-S SENATE IN KENTUC..KY WHERE REPUBLICAN RAND PAUL IS LOOKING FOR HIS THIRD TERM IN THE SENATE. THE REPUBLICAN RACE WAS CALLED VERY EARLY TONIGHT... AND AS EXPECTED PAUL WON BY A LANDSLIDE OVER VALERIE FREDRICK, AND PAUL HAMILTO..N. TAKING NEARLY 90 PERCENT OF THE VO. TE ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE... CHARLES BOOKER WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO CLM AIA SEAT AS A KENTUCKY SENATOR. THE FORMER STATE LAWMAKER BEAT OUT JOSH BLANTON AND JOH MERILL BY A LANDSLIDE AS WELL. LIKE THE REPUBLICAN RACE.. THIS WAS CALLED VERY EARLY. SO THAT SETS UP BOOKER AND PAUL AGAINST EACH OTHER OTHN BALLOT. PAUL --A FORMER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE -- HOLDS A LARGE FUNDRAISING ADVANTAGE OVER HIS CHALLENG. ER BOOKER HAS A CHANCE TO MAKE HISTORY... AS KENTUCKY HASN'T ELECT AED DEMOCRAT TO THE U-S SENATE SINCE 1992. ANOTHER RACE WE WERE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON IS THE DISTRICT 4 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE RE.AC THOMAS MASSIE HANDILY DEFEATING A FIELD OF REPUBLICANS IN THIS ONE... WITH MORE THAN 70 PERCENT OF THE VOTE. AGAIN WE'LL CONTINUE TO RUN RESULTS AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR SCREEN DURING OUR NEWSCAST. .. YOU CAN ALSO SCAN THE CODEN I THE RIGHT CORNER OF YOUR SCREEN WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO A FULL LIST OF RESULTS ON OUR WEBSITE -- W-L-W-T.COM. STEVEN ALBRITTON WLWT NEWS FIVE.

Thomas Massie wins GOP nomination for Kentucky US Representative

Updated: 11:17 PM EDT May 17, 2022

Thomas Massie, who is seeking reelection, has won the GOP nomination for Kentucky US Representative.Massie defeated a handful of GOP challengers in Tuesdays 4th District primary. The libertarian-minded congressman represents a district stretching across Northern Kentucky. Massie won an endorsement of former President Donald Trump leading up to the primary.Massie beat out his three challengers, Claire Wirth, Alyssa McDowell and George Washington.

Thomas Massie, who is seeking reelection, has won the GOP nomination for Kentucky US Representative.

Massie defeated a handful of GOP challengers in Tuesdays 4th District primary. The libertarian-minded congressman represents a district stretching across Northern Kentucky. Massie won an endorsement of former President Donald Trump leading up to the primary.

Massie beat out his three challengers, Claire Wirth, Alyssa McDowell and George Washington.

Link:
Thomas Massie wins GOP nomination for Kentucky US Representative - WLWT Cincinnati

In the early days of the state-level movement to legalize marijuana, we often got opposition from a surprising camp libertarians.

You would think libertarians would be thrilled with laws rolling back cannabis prohibition, but for many, it wasnt enough. Skeptical libertarians found a myriad of reasons to oppose legalization efforts, saying they didnt go far enough.

The movement started in the early 1970s and really started to grow with the legalization of medical marijuana in California way back in 1996. Opponents protested, what about everybody else?

Some libertarians also opposed medical marijuana on principle, saying people shouldnt need a state-issued card to access cannabis. Theyre not wrong theoretically. Asking the government for permission is never desirable. But the fact is virtually all of these people carry a card so they can drive.

As the legalization movement grew and states started allowing recreational marijuana, libertarians often complained about the tax and regulatory schemes attached to cannabis legalization bills and used this as a reason to oppose reforms. Of course, you never heard any of these people arguing that it would be better for alcohol to be illegal rather than heavily taxed and regulated, as it is in most states.

Another common objection was that legalizing marijuana doesnt help people who have already been convicted of marijuana crimes. Having a criminal record has lifelong consequences and millions of people have to go through life with this legal millstone tied around their necks simply because at some point they possessed or sold a plant. What about these people? Again, they would actively oppose legalization bills on this basis.

But think about the implied logic. Were going to allow more people to get caught in this legal web because this bill doesnt address the needs of people already caught in this legal web. Sounds self-defeating, doesnt it?

In reality, all of these are legitimate concerns. These libertarian opponents were generally right about the problems inherent in most legalization schemes. They were good on the philosophy. But opposing legalization efforts because they arent good enough is a bad strategy.

Consider this: would a starving man turn down a slice of bread because it wasnt a whole loaf?

Lets be honest here. Today, were starving for liberty at every turn.

Sometimes you have to take what you get so you have the ability to move forward. If the man gets a slice of bread, hell have the energy to go for that loaf.

The same principle applies to legislative activism. Small steps forward often lead to more steps forward.

Thomas Jefferson understood this well. In fact, in a 1790 letter to the Rev. Charles Clay Jefferson said liberty is to be gained by inches.

The ground of liberty is to be gained by inches that we must be contented to secure what we can get from time to time, and eternally press forward for what is yet to get. It takes time to persuade men to do even what is for their own good. [Emphasis added]

Consider the issue of past marijuana convictions. Its true that in the early days of the cannabis legalization movement, this was rarely addressed. But today, most proposed legalization measures include provisions to expunge past convictions. As just one example, Between July and September 2021, New Jersey courts dismissed or vacated an estimated 362,000 marijuana cases. But if those early efforts had failed because they werent good enough, we would have never gotten to this place.

Heres the strategic reality: once a state legalizes marijuana even if only in a very limited way the law tends to eventually expand, often times because good people are pointing out how the first step isnt good enough.

As the state tears down some barriers, markets develop and demand expands. That creates pressure to further relax state law. Ive seen this over and over again. States that initially ban home marijuana cultivation often relax laws to allow it down the road. Limits on production get raised. Expungement provisions get passed.

But you have to take the first step before you can take the second.

Jefferson understood this too. In a letter to James Madison on Nov. 17, 1798 the day after his Kentucky Resolutions opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts were passed he wrote:

"I inclose you a copy of the draught of the Kentucky resolves. I think we should distinctly affirm all the important principles they contain, so as to hold to that ground in future, and leave the matter in such a train as that we may not be committed absolutely to push the matter to extremities, & yet may be free to push as far as events will render prudent."

Its important not to allow the perfect to become the enemy of good when it comes to political activism. Opposing decent or even mediocre bills can slam the door on broader reforms in the future.

Thomas Jefferson was right. To advance liberty in the face of the largest government in history, we have to use smart strategy.

Take what we can get by pushing as far as events will render prudent, and then eternally press forward for more.

Michael Maharrey is communications director of the Tenth Amendment Center, managing editor of the SchiffGold blog, and founder of GodArchy.org. This article was republished from tenthamendmentcenter.com.

Go here to see the original:
OPINION: Step by Step for Liberty: Cannabis Edition - The Richmond Observer