Mediaboss Marketing

OKLAHOMA CITY (Free Press) Voters across Oklahoma who have not voted already at their county election boards or through absentee ballot will head to their precinct polling places Tuesday.

Several metro districts are seeing open seats this election with several in each party running for the nomination to represent their party in the race leading up to the November 2 Election Day this fall.

Especially in Oklahoma County, the hot-button issue of whether to vote for or against a bond that will provide the core of funding for a new Oklahoma County Detention Center or Jail has captured far more attention than most bond issue elections.

Here is our coverage of the proposals and issues some have with the proposal:

The following is information provided by the Oklahoma State Election Board with information you need to know before Tuesday, especially since districts in wider OKC metro have changed, some drastically.

Oklahoma hasclosed primaries. However, for the 2022-2023 election years, the Democratic Party has opened its primaries to registered Independents.

Independent voters wishing to vote a Democratic ballot, should let the election worker know when they check in at their polling place. As a reminder, Independent and Libertarian voters are eligible to vote in any nonpartisan elections on the ballot.

Due to statutory redistricting, some precincts have changed. As a result, some polling places may have also changed.All voters should verify their polling place before heading to the polls.Voters can verify their polling place using theOK Voter Portalor by contacting theirCounty Election Boardor theState Election Board. The State Election Board reminds voters that you must vote at your assigned polling place.

Study the candidates and issues before going to the polls. View your sample ballot using the OK Voter Portal. You can also use the portal to find your polling place and track the status of your absentee ballot. Theelection listis available on the State Election Board website.

Oklahoma law requires every voter who votes in person to show proof of identity before receiving a ballot.

There are three ways to showproof of identityunder the law (only one proof of identity is required):

It is common for voters to ask, How do I know my voted counted? Information regardingballot statuscan be found on the State Election Board website, along with details regarding Oklahomasvoting devicesandsecurity procedures.

Election resultswill be available on the State Election Board website after the polls close at 7 p.m. on election night.

During election time, misinformation and disinformation can run rampant. Voters are asked to be wary of information that seeks to promote conspiracy theories or false claims of fraud, voter suppression and/or other problems.

If you experience an issue or believe an election or voting crime has been committed, your first action should be to notify your precinct officials and contact your County Election Board while the incident is in progress. County Election Board officials will take immediate action to resolve the issue and/or contact local law enforcement.

State and county election officials shouldalwaysbe your trusted sources for information.

Last Updated June 27, 2022, 3:25 PM by Brett Dickerson Editor

Link:
Ready for Election Day Tuesday, June 28? Some things have changed! - Oklahoma City Free Press

Rural Kincaid resident Arlyn Briggs, a Republican candidate for Kansas governor, said his recent legal problems would blow over. Hes for term limits and wont take a salary if elected governor. (Kansas Reflector screen capture of Allen County Jail photograph)

By TIM CARPENTERKansas Reflector

TOPEKA Republican gubernatorial candidate Arlyn Briggs recorded a campaign commercial outlining his vision of conservative government in Kansas only to find out a prominent Christian radio network had no intention of airing the advertisement.

He said an employee at Bott Radio Network in Overland Park explained the campaign spot couldnt be used on the network after learning of Briggs arrest on a charge of criminal threat against a law enforcement officer. The arrest in Allen County was a misunderstanding that ought to be resolved in his favor, Briggs said, but the radio networks rebuff was a setback in his primary campaign against GOP frontrunner Derek Schmidt, who is the states attorney general.

Im a strong Christian, Briggs said. My job is to be a strong reflection of Jesus Christ.

Briggs, 64, of rural Kincaid, said the legal trouble stemmed from allowing a man being sought by law enforcement for an alleged stalking offense to stay with him in early June. Briggs noticed a sheriffs department vehicle driving slowly past his home, so he called the department to remind authorities of the castle doctrine, the stand-your-ground right of individuals in Kansas to take reasonable action, including deadly force, in defense of a home.

He warned law enforcement officers not to try anything, he said, and pointedly added I may shoot you. He said he wouldnt have actually fired on deputies, and nothing happened. But officers later served an Anderson County warrant on him for criminal threat. He was released June 15 from Allen County Jail.

If successful in the Aug. 2 primary against Schmidt, Briggs would likely face Democratic frontrunner Gov. Laura Kelly as well as independent candidate Dennis Pyle and Libertarian Seth Cordell in November. If victorious in the general election, Briggs said he would donate his state government salary to charity.

I feel the primary is where the contest is this year. Kelly is so liberal, Briggs said. I say vote for the person. Not what they said, but what they do.

Briggs said he was disappointed with Schmidt as a political leader, and asserted the attorney general was too focused on getting on U.S. Sen. Jerry Morans good list in anticipation of eventually running for Morans seat in the U.S. Senate. Briggs said hed challenged Schmidt to five debates, but hadnt received a response.

I think theres growing concern among conservatives across the United States and Kansas with whats happening with government and our leaders, Briggs said.

On social media last year, Briggs was critical of state legislators who he claimed talked about the value of local government control and then passed bills stripping local elected officials of influence. He said Democratic and Republican politicians at the statehouse believed they were Gods appointed Kings over the serfs. He said they all should be taught a lesson by being voted out of office.

Briggs ran for the Kansas House in 2012 and 2020, but lost both contests. He was soundly defeated in the most recent campaign, falling to state Rep. Trevor Jacobs, with Jacobs securing 83% of the vote in a GOP primary.

He said he lived in Johnson County for about 30 years. He worked for a Kansas City bank and at Hallmark and has been employed as a trucker and farmer. He performed mission work in more than a dozen countries, he said.

Briggs lieutenant governor running mate is Abilene resident Lance Berland, who Briggs said recently performed community service in Colorado to deal with his own legal challenges.

On social media, Berland said we the people were engaged in a fight against Republican and Democrat warmongers, the most bloated, wasteful bureaucracy in human history and corrupt crony capitalists. He claimed businessman George Soros, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett were involved in demise of U.S. freedom.

We have been played, and Americans killed, by our own government and the ultra-wealthy non-citizens who dominate our nation from Davos, Geneva, and Brussels, he said. These people have perpetuated and delivered the world only racism, eugenics, war, toxicity, disease and unnecessary deaths by the hundreds of millions. These people serve only themselves and the devil.

He also expressed disappointment Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden were convinced by the global health mafia to recommend Americans be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Link:
Kan. governor candidate arrested on felony charge plunges ahead with campaign - Hays Post

Last summer, Motherboard's Matthew Cassel visited a group of libertarians and crypto enthusiasts who are trying to create their own micronation called Liberland on disputed land sitting between Croatia and Serbia.

As Yugoslavia splintered in the early 1990s, various countries rose from the former territory but a tiny island on the Danube River fell into dispute between Serbia and Croatia. In 2015, Vit Jedlicka, a Czech citizen, planted a flag on the island and declared it a new country, Liberland, with Jedlicka at its helm as president. He and other libertarians have pinned their hopes on the micronation despite Liberland being unrecognized by any country and inaccessible to any of the people eager to become citizens because Croatian border police arrest anyone who tries to step foot on the island.

Cassel visited the Liberlanders during Floating Man, a multi-day festival celebrating the unrealized dream of making a libertarian nation run on Bitcoin and the blockchain. When asked who Liberlanders were and what they had in common, Jedlicka told VICE: "People that believe in freedom and want to start somethingthey're kind of fed up with existing systems, they understand that it's easier to actually start new things than to fix anything in the existing political system.

At Floating Man, individuals and citizens are free to talk about whatever they like. VICE heard presentations ranging from discussions of crypto-anarchism and darknet markets to how we dont really have diseases and opera performances.

Motherboard talked with Zuzana Uchnarova, a Bitcoin miner who dreams of becoming an ambassador of Liberland, who explained that "for you, [Liberland] is just a dream but for me it's real. I know we want to change the world and I know we want to change something."

Vit Jetlika, President of Liberland, ferries a boatload of festival attendees to visit the uninhabited island after his house boat broke down and nearly sank. Photo: Jake Kruty (IG: @jakedog___)

Uchnarova added that she thought Liberland could be a new Dubai, or home to a fantastical space program.

"We would like to build a new Dubai here, maybe more than Dubai," she said. "Maybe we will build something that will transfer us to orbit directly. My dream is to have a hotel in orbit and everything will be paid for by bitcoins."

Founded and backed by individuals who made early fortunes in cryptocurrency, Liberland and its denizens have a dream of integrating it into every facet of life. Jedlicka wants financial transactions to exist on the blockchain, but also the countrys Congress, Senate, justice system, and voting system.

In Liberland, taxes will give you merits that can be used for voting. The more taxes you pay, the more tokens you recieve. Jedlicka believes this is much fairer than trying to give everyone the same vote.

"If you paid $30 million in taxes, you still have one vote. That's one of the things that's a little broken about the systems that we are living in, Jedlicka said. It's very important to do it so that the majority of society cannot dictate the minority, especially the minority that actually pays the taxes and makes the country possible.

A Liberland flag and a beer sit in the grass on the Serbian banks of the Danube River. Photo: Jake Kruty (IG: @jakedog___)

In a discussion with Jillian Crandall, an architect and instructor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and Edward Ongweso Jr, a staff writer at Motherboard, the CRYPTOLAND panel talked more about the community and its goals, and how it intersects with current themes around crypto-colonialism, or crypto-wealthy people trying to set up enclaves that benefit them in foreign territories.

"It stems from the foundation of a very explicit tax haven from the EU for people who are self-proclaimed techno-libertarians and right-libertarians, to form their own community, Crandall explained. "Where I get concerned is where these systems are being rolled out as a techno-fix for a more efficient governance systems that allow its citizens to participate in a voting structure that they're being told is a very democratic voting structure increasing efficiencies because its using computational technologies and using the blockchain (which is a very transparent, trustless system). People might say yeah, absolutely, I want to get behind that, I like how that sounds. But they might not understand that the more tokens you have, the more votes you have, the more pull you have.

Read more here:
Inside Liberland, a Crypto-Libertarian Micronation In Eastern Europe

Damien Grant is an Auckland business owner, a member of the Taxpayers Union and a regular opinion contributor to Stuff, writing from a libertarian perspective.

OPINION: The Prime Minister can shuffle her front bench, sack a few lame ducks and shovel even more responsibility onto her few capable ministers. It will not work.

Her administration is caught in a death-spiral from which there is no return, and from which there will be no respite.

This government is done. Their poll numbers are buoyant but, as we have been taught many times in recent years, polls are misleading and unreliable.

READ MORE:* What the polls show: National nears pre-pandemic support, Labour's reign vulnerable* Chris Hipkins as Police Minister may be 'window dressing for the public' - Mark Mitchell* Can Labour attack Christopher Luxon and 'be kind' at the same time?

The one thing a poll can tell you with certainty is the trend; and the trend is clear. The electorate has tired of this government, or, perhaps, they have simply tired of its leader.

Ardern is trapped by her past success, and her past mistakes. She has one achievement: Covid.

Everything else has been a failure or of no enduring electoral weight, and more concerning for the ninth floor, she appears to be losing control of her own party.

She can sack Poto Williams, but she lacks the mana to fire Nanaia Mahuta, a much larger electoral liability but with a lot more political oomph.

ROBERT KITCHIN/Stuff

Damien Grant sees Nanaia Mahuta as an electoral liability for Jacinda Ardern, but the strength of the Mori caucus offers Mahuta protection.

The Prime Minister is unwilling or, more likely, unable to stand up to the Mori caucus, whose demands on issues like co-governance is proving a marketing bonanza to the Taxpayers Union, whose Three Waters rural road-show is playing to packed halls.

Defenders of Ardern will point to her outstanding performance in the aftermath of the Christchurch terror attack and the response to White Island, and in moments of crisis this Prime Minister has no equal. It is difficult to envision Luxon acting with such pathos or empathy.

Yet none of it matters. Even the Covid response is looking tattered in retrospect, with the missteps of not ordering stock in time, border failures, and the public relations disaster of how the parliamentary lawn protest was handled.

Within the political right, there is a belief that they are now a government in waiting. Christopher Luxon is confident. David Seymour is fizzing in anticipation. Chris Bishop, Nicola Willis, Brooke van Velden and even Todd Muller are waiting to get their mittens onto the levers of state.

Chris McKeen/Stuff

Christopher Luxon is talking the talk, but it may be what he hasnt said or done which will really count come the next election.

The mood of the boardroom, at least from my anecdotal encounters, is an expectation, even anticipation, that the irresponsible and unresponsive Ardern ministry will soon be swept away.

Well. Maybe.

Elections are tricky things. Favourites do not always win, and we should never underestimate the power of office, nor the ferocity of an incumbent with her back to the wall and everything to play for.

Few electoral certainties are more famous than Thomas E Dewey, the clean-cut Republican with the Freddie Mercury moustache, pegged to defeat incumbent Harry S Truman in the 1948 presidential election.

Deweys defeat is notable because it was unexpected, but it is also relevant because he was the front-runner and took the path often favoured by front-runners play it safe.

Brook Mitchell/Getty Images

Scott Morrison surprised everyone with his come-from-behind victory in Australias 2019 election. He is pictured with his family on that election night.

He ran a campaign so bland that one paper mocked that he had four stump speeches that could be summarised as: Agriculture is important. Our rivers are full of fish. You cannot have freedom without liberty. Our future lies ahead.

Across the Tasman we saw a similar result in 2019, when the unpopular Liberal administration headed by Scott Morrison held onto power against predictions of certain defeat.

Morrison had been consistently behind in the polls, but when the time came to vote for change, many Australians mysteriously decided not to.

Labour leader Bill Shorten ran a risk-adverse campaign, avoiding big commitments, that was later de-constructed by his party as lacking a political strategy and with a cluttered policy agenda.

Perhaps the most relevant upset, when looking at our upcoming election, is the 1992 election in the United Kingdom.

Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

John Major may not have been Britains highest performing prime minister, but he still managed to win when it mattered.

John Major was the dour and unimpressive successor to Margaret Thatcher, whose government was grappling with falling house prices, 10% interest rates, rising unemployment and dismal polling. Yet his Conservatives snatched a remarkable win against the run of play.

Voters, it has been claimed, simply didnt find opposition leader Neil Kinnock convincing, and the Tories were successful in painting Labour as lacking fiscal responsibility.

Opinion polls are like by-elections and high-school sweethearts an opportunity to experiment without having to make a serious commitment. What matters is what voters will do once in the cardboard confines of a polling booth.

National is too confident. They are standing at the edge of the dance, waiting for the voter to tire of their current partner rather than seeking to cut in. It is significant that the Taxpayers Union, and not the National Party, is holding rallies against Three Waters.

SUPPLIED/Stuff

The Prime Minister enjoys a moment Chris Luxon is unlikely to ever have, getting US airtime with Stephen Colbert.

For all her failings, Ardern retains enormous respect and, in some quarters, genuine affection. Many voters secretly quite like the fact that our Prime Minister is feted on the global stage.

Chris Luxon isnt a celebrity. He will not be invited to meet Stephen Colbert. Anthony Albanese will not give him a hug. Ardern has a cachet he lacks and, maybe, voters will pause before letting her go.

And here is the real challenge for National. Economic uncertainty has fallen over the country like a hoar frost, and if this uncertainty is matched with a savage downturn, two things will come into play.

First, if it is a global meltdown, Ardern and Grant Robertson will not be held responsible, any more than they were held responsible for Covid.

Stuff

Damien Grant is an Auckland business owner, a member of the Taxpayers' Union and a regular opinion contributor for Stuff, writing from a libertarian perspective.

Second, who are voters going to trust more to look after them: the empathetic Ardern and her big-spending, fiscally irresponsible Robertson, or the former airline executive?

Luxon hasnt made it clear what National would do if elected, other than a few populist policies. He is playing it safe.

Because they have not defined themselves, National and its leader is providing the Government the opportunity to do it for them, which partly explains why we are seeing Labour running negative attacks on Luxon.

It would take a massive effort for National to lose the next election, against an unpopular administration which has lost its mandate and credibility. They seem up for that challenge.

Read this article:
The Ardern Government is in a death spiral with no hope... or is it? - Stuff

I have been married three times, and I would like to think that makes me equipped to tell the difference between love and lust. Most of us realise we are in love in the most unromantic of situations. For me, it was when I was heavily pregnant, had severe vertigo and had just vomited in the doctors surgery.

Ive wet myself, I announced a few minutes later, mortified and weeping in the passenger seat of my husbands prized black VW Golf, convinced he was ready to jump ship.

Its OK, darling, he whispered, leaning over to buckle my belly into the seat. In that moment, I knew that this really was love. It wasnt that I didnt think I loved him before, but age had altered the way I felt about things. I had said it to someone else before, and it hadnt worked out, and I wondered what that elusive glue was that kept couples happy together for ever.

I was 39, and he was 48. We had been together for three years, marrying seven months after wed met. We had both been in relationships that had changed us. They had shaped us into people who could build a life together.

My husband and I come from similar backgrounds: our mothers were both raised in Karachi and we grew up speaking English and Urdu, navigating what it meant to be of Pakistani heritage in Britain, and Muslim. Despite these similarities, we chose different ends of the spectrum of life as our starting points He went backpacking across the globe in his 20s; I got married.

He used to describe himself as a liberal libertarian, open to all the experiences of life. I was an uptight, conservative Muslim woman, who was once nicknamed the runaway bride because I had left two arranged marriages. He spent his life avoiding girls like me, and if wed met earlier it would never have worked. Ironically, it was the very things that I thought would put someone off me that he had liked: I had a juicy past, I had lived on the edges of acceptability, albeit reluctantly, and I had nothing to hide.

I often ask him what made him pursue me. I fancied you, he says. It never fails to raise a smile, because who doesnt want to be lusted after? I never knew how nice it would be to be with someone who speaks Urdu, he once added, thoughtfully.

Esther Perel, the author of Mating in Captivity says, Love is a vessel that contains both security and adventure. For my husband and me, our diversity of thought brings the adventure, and the familiarity of our experiences offers security. It has been the bridge between lust and love.

Single friends ask how I knew I could trust that it would be different this time, how I knew that he was the one; the answer is that I didnt. I just knew what I wanted my life to look like, and I could see he wanted the same, and that was what made it worth taking the risk. So, I made myself vulnerable. Life had taught me that whatever happened, I would handle it.

It is always in the most ordinary moments that I have felt extraordinary love for my husband. Like the Valentines Day after our first child was born, when I was breastfeeding in bed, exhausted from motherhood. He brought me a cup of tea and a packet of cheese-and-onion crisps my favourite. I cried. It was confirmation that he knew me, the tiny things about me, like the way I take my tea, or the fact that I dont like sultanas in scones, or the kind of things I watch on TV.

My Nani used to say that it takes 20 years to fall in love, and I would laugh at her practicality, teasing her about whether she had ever really loved her husband, since she had become a widow at 35. But she always smiled when she spoke of my grandfather. Her marriage had been arranged when she was 18, so there hadnt been a long courtship.

I now understand that she was teaching me about true love, that it grows with the years of incremental kindness. Its a lesson I am reminded of every time my husband hands me a cup of tea at the end of a long day.

Read the original here:
Three marriages have taught me what true love looks like a cup of tea and some cheese and onion crisps - The Guardian