Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

Independent Lt. Governor candidates say both parties have failed to solve New Jersey’s problems – New Jersey Globe | New Jersey Politics

Two independent candidates for Lt. Governor called on New Jerseyans to consider alternatives to the Democratic and Republican parties during a debate sponsored by the New Jersey Globe on Monday evening.

Eveline Brownstein is running on the Libertarian ticket with Gregg Mele and Heather Warburton is Madelyn Hoffmans running mate for the Green Party.

Like last weeks debate between Lt. Governor Sheila Oliver and the Republican nominee, former State Sen. Diane Allen, there were no fireworks between Brownstein and Warburton, although they disagreed on mask mandates, climate change and taxes.

Early on, Warburton addressed what she called the elephant in the room the exclusion of independent candidates from debates involving major party candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor.

Ms. Brownstein and I are essentially kind of being placed at the kids table tonight, and thats purely because of how many rich people were know or in our case, dont know, Warburton said. New Jersey sets the rules of who can be in the official debate, and its basically what candidates have raised about half-million dollars. Thats it. Its nothing to do with how valid your ideas are.

Candidates who did not qualify for public matching funds were not including in the Allen/Oliver debate, also sponsored by the New Jersey Globe.

Brownstein used the debate as an opportunity to introduce herself to New Jersey voters.

Like many of our constituents, I have owned a small business. Im an immigrant. I worked for companies. Ive volunteered for non-profit organizations. I care for an aging parent, and I parented future adults all seven of them, said Brownstein. Those experiences dont make me an expert. They only open my eyes to see and my ears to continue listening to the varied and unique experiences of others, and to advocate for individual solutions over the one size fits all approach of government.

The Rumson human resources executive said that she wants to find better solutions than government bureaucracy and ones that incorporate accountability for outcomes rather than praise for cookie cutter initiatives that serve very few.

Warburton, an artist and longtime activist from Hammonton shes a former Democrat noted that independent candidates enter the race knowing the deck is stacked against you at every opportunity and you run because youre so passionate about fixing things, you cant sit on the sidelines.

New Jersey is broken, Warburton said. Were on the front lines of catastrophic climate change here, but our state has no real plan to address it. Our tax system is unjust and unfair. People lack comprehensive health care. Poverty is ever rising. Racial inequality and income inequality never seem to get any better. The two-party system has failed us in every turn. Voter apathy is rampant, and it seems like neither of the two big guys are offering real solutions.

The moderator, New Jersey Globe reporter Joey Fox, said that if an independent candidate were to win, they would be dealing with a legislature dominated by lawmakers from the Democratic and Republican parties. He asked the candidates how they would bridge the partisan divide.

You have to find areas where you agree and you have to work on those areas where you dont, Brownstein said. Compromises where everybody feels that they gave up a little bit of something, but theyre satisfied with the outcome.

But if that doesnt work, Brownstein said there is a workaround.

Governor Murphy tells me there is such a thing as an executive order, she said, in a tongue-in-cheek sort of way. In this political climate we are in, you have to be sworn enemies and I dont think thats necessary.

Warburton said she loved the question.

If we win I know, the odds are kind of stacked against us it would be an overwhelming groundswell of people power that put us into the governor seat, she said. We would have a great mandate from the people to make the changes that were talking about. Theyre saying that this is what they want to say.

She said that if the legislature stood in the way of that mandate, she would be out there in the streets with the people with bullhorns marching in the streets and showing up at the executive sessions and showing up that peoples offices and saying why are you blocking what the people want?

The people are our greatest resource here and if the people speak that loudly that they say what were talking about they really value that and they really want it. Then it would just be disappointing if the legislative block that clearly because were from a different party than them, Warburton explained. But I always believe in giving people the opportunity to disappoint me, so I will show up and I will work with anyone. It doesnt matter if you have a D or an R, if youre Libertarian or Socialist Worker.

The two candidates each said they have been vaccinated but differed in governments role in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.

I am a huge advocate for vaccines, said Brownstein. I grew up in Africa and I have seen the devastation that occurs when people are not vaccinated and there are preventable diseases.

But she said she does not support vaccination mandates.

That is a decision that each person has to make for themselves, Brownstein stated. I wouldnt mandate it.

That applies to teachers and health care workers too.

I dont think government needs to get involved, said Brownstein. I think the schools should decide what kind of school environment they want to provide, and parents should be able to choose.

Warburton said she believes everyone should get vaccinated but stopped short of agreeing with a mandate.

The science is clear. Vaccines are safe and vaccines are effective, she argued. Theyre one of our best tools at fighting this pandemic.

But Warburton acknowledged that government doesnt have a great track record among New Jerseyans who live in marginalized communities.

So we have to work to really build that trust and build that relationship, she said.

And she says some people who wont get the vaccine need to be subjected to bi-weekly testing to make sure youre safe and youre not spreading disease to others.

Warburton said she supports a mask mandate in the school, but Brownstein said that while she supports mask wearing, she doesnt think government should mandate them.

The two independents disagreed on climate change.

We need to be investing in alternatives Green alternatives, Green infrastructure, Warburton said. Part of what were running on is an eco-Socialist Green New Deal, which goes above and beyond the Green New Deal you may have heard about from people like (Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) where we really work to transition people from polluting and dangerous jobs into Green, renewable, useful jobs where you can make a living wage and save the world at the same time.

Brownstein said she doesnt think government-mandated climate change programs funded by special interests looking to profit off the new ideas.

If this is a government-driven solution, government will look for the solution it wants, not the best, she said.

Brownstein signed on to the same no tax increase pledge that Gov. Phil Murphy and Republican Jack Ciattarelli agreed to in a debate last month, but the Green Party candidate disagreed.

Corporations and wealthy people are not paying their fair share, Warburton. We dont have a progressive tax system, we have a regressive tax system.

Brownstein said that taxes are too high but cited low-income New Jerseyans who are trapped in the state who cant get ahead but also cant leave.

We should lower taxes for everybody, she said.

The Libertarian candidate said he would seek greater accountability for existing government programs.

There are lots of government initiatives, lots of government programs that money gets thrown out for which there is no accountability for outcomes, said Brownstein. We need to start looking at the budget. We need to start looking at the outcomes and we need to demand better for the money that were paying for things.

Warburton called New Jerseys tax system unfair and unjust, where seems like the middle class or kind of the only people paying taxes.

Our tax structure should be based on your ability to pay taxes. Tax rates have fallen. What the share of the budget thats made up by corporate taxes is about a third of what it was just a few decades ago, she stated. It seems true for people making over $1,000,000 what their tax rate is a fraction of what it used to be, whereas the people in the middle class are getting squeezed.

Both candidates support the codification of Roe v. Wade into state law.

Warburton called for reproductive freedom across the board and Brownstein said she would 100% support a womans right to choose.

Brownstein said the issue of abortion was personal to her.

I had two miscarriages, she explained. Under the Texas law, if a neighbor knew about that, they could ostensibly suggest that I had an abortion. I would be vehemently opposed to any interference with a womans right to have those discussions with her doctor and to make personal decisions about her body.

The Libertarian and Green Party candidates agreed on ranked choice voting and expanding the use of technology to expand voter participation in elections.

Warburton said she supports defunding the police and transferring those funds to programs that actually benefit the communities and said concentrating policing in certain areas is really sort of a war on Black and Brown people.

She called for the legalization of some recreational drugs and citizen review boards with actual teeth.

Brownstein said the state needs to end the entire failed war on drugs.

Putting a substance into your body should not be a crime you could go to jail for, she said. It has negatively affected communities of color and there is no reason for it. It has to end. We have to stop criminalizing all the drugs. What people put in their body is their choice.

She also called for the legalization of prostitution.

Brownstein had a one-word answer to the best way to repair inequalities between white residents and its residents of color.

Liberty, she said. It is the greatest equalizer. You can only have the same level for everybody if everybody has the same level of liberty.

She said equity would come by everybody having the same freedoms.

Freedoms are not driven by whats in your bank account, Brownstein explained. Its your inalienable right to those freedoms.

Warburton said that people are still benefiting from white supremacy and that people who were descendants of slaves are still unable to build generational wealth.

Our campaign is actually talking about reparations, Warburton stated. How do we repair the damage thats been done, not just to Black communities but to indigenous communities?

Fox asked the two candidates which cabinet post they would take if they were elected lieutenant governor.

Both said theyd like to follow Oliver as the Commissioner of Community Affairs.

Brownstein and Warburton called for an end to a two-party system.

For real change in our great state, who must vote for change and the two parties have let you down with empty promises after empty promise and disguising their initiatives is knew even though they lack any innovation or modern thinking. Lets change that in New Jersey, Brownstein said. Lets be the first state in the nation to elect leaders, not from one of the parties of continual failure but from the party that really does have new and innovative idea.

Vivian Sahner, the Socialist Workers Party candidate for Lt. Governor, had initially accepted an invitation to debate but later dropped out.

Read the original:
Independent Lt. Governor candidates say both parties have failed to solve New Jersey's problems - New Jersey Globe | New Jersey Politics

Dave Chappelle is right on trans and other commentary – New York Post

Iconoclast: Chappelle Is Right on Trans

The elite media in the United States prevents readers from knowing that a debate is even happening over gender ideology, observes Andrew Sullivan at his Substack. No wonder that when Dave Chappelle bases almost an entire Netflix special on the subject alternately hilarious and humane, brutal and true and wades into the debate with wellies on, the exact same piece about the special will be written in much of elite media, framing the comedian as a bigot. But Chappelle only did what a comic is supposed to do: point out that the current emperor has no clothes. A transwoman cannot give birth as a woman gives birth. She does not ovulate. Her vagina is a simulacrum. Chappelles right.

Liberal: Dems Hispanic Problem

Joe Biden in 2020 characterized Donald Trump as, among other things, an unapologetic racist who particularly detested immigrants, but it utterly failed to juice Hispanics support for Democrats, Ruy Texiera explains at The Liberal Patriot. Instead, Latinos shifted 16 percentage points toward Trump from 201 26 points among Cubans and 12 among those of Mexican origin . . . and even Puerto Ricans moved toward Trump by 18 points. Now, new data show the shift was mainly among working-class Hispanics and the young: Those under 30 gave him 41 percent support. Dems keep ignoring the fact that Latinos care above all, about jobs, the economy and health care and are heavily oriented toward upward mobility, as well as patriotic. Democrats woes will continue until they base their appeals to this group on what these voters care about the most rather than what Democrats believe they should care about.

Libertarian: Blas Wrongheaded G&T Shift

Mayor de Blasios decision to wind down Gotham schools Gifted and Talented program accelerates the progressive trend of measuring the racial composition of students and declaring the results evidence of segregation if there are too few black and Latino participants, fumes Reasons Matt Welch. And by embracing the term segregation, de Blasio adds legitimacy to the disreputable political tactic of branding policy skeptics as racist. The better way is not to close down avenues enjoyed by a select few, but to give everyone potential access to the maximum number of quality options. Easier said than done, but never accomplished by a system of one-size-fits-all.

Pandemic journal: Mandates Forever?

Why arent we even talking about easing COVID restrictions? asks Ross Barkan in The Atlantic. Though coronavirus cases are on the decline in most of America, leaders have no clear benchmarks for lifting mandates, a noted departure from every other pandemic phase, when people could follow case numbers or positivity rates and anticipate that mitigation measures promised a return to life as we once knew it. Eventually, all pandemics end, and unlike with the flu pandemic of a century ago, which killed a far higher percentage of Americans, vaccines now exist to save lives. Public-health experts silence prompts the question: Will a new normal arise, with future generations learning to always flash their vaccine card or pass at bouncers and bartenders, like airline passengers have accepted removing their shoes and belt in a display of security theater 20 years after 9/11?

Ex-prosecutor: DAs, Do Your Job

The radical lefts enterprise to reform the criminal-justice system is to pretend that we dont have criminals or to assign blame for all crime on our systemically racist society, Andrew McCarthy thunders at The Hill. Imagine if lefty prosecutors like Chicagos Kim Foxx werent hypnotized under the spell of disparate-impact analysts. They wouldnt keep coming up with creative ways to resist charging young black males who commit a disproportionate amount of crime in urban centers. These novelties include declining to invoke the anti-gang sentencing enhancement provisions. Though state legislatures enact these laws, prosecutors are effectively and imperiously repealing them because they disproportionately punish African Americans. But professional criminals are recidivists, and if they are repeatedly returned to the streets, rather than prosecuted and imprisoned, they commit lots more crime. Prosecutors must enforce the law.

Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

The rest is here:
Dave Chappelle is right on trans and other commentary - New York Post

Why Princess Blanding launched the Liberation Party in Virginia – wtvr.com

RICHMOND, Va. -- Ten months ago, Princess Blanding launched a campaign for governor and a new political party in Virginia. Her name appears on Virginia ballots with fall, as the newly formed Liberation Party tries to make waves where no other third party has in recent Virginia history.

Blanding said her political efforts extend well beyond ten months, though. In fact, she easily quotes the exact date.

My spark started on May 14, 2018."

It was the day Blandings brother, Marcus-David Peters, was shot and killed by a Richmond Police Officer while experiencing a mental health crisis. The shooting was later ruled justified by the Richmond Commonwealths Attorney's office.

Since my brothers murder, myself, family members, and a continuously growing supporter base here in Richmond and beyond, have begged our local officials that we cant bring Marcus back, but we can at least enact legislation that prioritizes community care and safety, she said.

Blanding points to the legislation that bears her brothers name as an example of her frustration with the two-party political system.

Signed by Virginia Governor Ralph Northam in 2020, the Marcus Alert bill launched a system to ensure behavioral health experts are involved in responding to individuals in crisis, including by limiting the role of law enforcement.

Blanding and other activists said the bill was a watered-down version of the original, but said it is only one example.

What were dealing with is politicians who are delivering nothing but crumbs. Theyre making symbolic gestures, such as removing the Robert E. Lee monument, while we still have people with nowhere to lay their head, she said. After the unjust murder of George Floyd, I kept saying, its time for the rise of a strong, independent party and we must expand our fight from the streets to seats of the key legislative positions. But, in all honesty, I didnt think I was going to be doing that.

Blanding and other activists launched the Liberation Party of Virginia. On ballots across the state, the abbreviation LP appears next to her name. The Libertarian Party, a completely separate party with no statewide candidate in 2021, goes by the abbreviation L on ballots.

The Liberation Party is here to do just that. To ensure that Liberation is a human right, not a privilege, for all Virginians, Blanding said. When we say that, we mean ensuring housing security, food sovereignty, Medicare for all. What were fighting for is bare-bones equity and humanity.

Third-party candidates have not fared well in statewide races in recent political history in Virginia.

In 2013, Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Robert Sarvis secured the highest percentage of the statewide vote by a third party candidate in more than 50 years; his 6.5% of votes more than tripled any other third party candidate for Governor.

Blanding knows those numbers but also points out this data point: it has been decades since more than 50% of registered voters in Virginia participated in a gubernatorial election. She argues her campaign speaks directly to those voters who feel left out by the two major parties.

They feel that nobody is listening and that nobody cares. So it is a breath of fresh air when they see there is a candidate who is fighting for all of us, for all working class, for all marginalized community members, for all the oppressed people, Blanding said.

Blanding said they expect to win the governors race, but no matter the outcome, they plan to continue efforts to grow the Liberation Party and run candidates in further state and local elections.

You can read more about the Blanding campaign and the Liberation Party here. You can watch her live interview with Bill Fitzgerald on CBS 6 at 7 p.m.

WTVR

Virginia Governor's Race Terry McAuliffe (Democratic)Glenn Youngkin (Republican)Princess Blanding (Liberation Party)

Virginia Lt. Governor's Race Hala Ayala (D) [Interview scheduled Oct. 15]Winsome Sears (R)

Virginia Attorney General RaceMark Herring (D)Jason Miyares (R)

To learn more about key local elections, click here for the CBS 6 voter's guide.

Watch CBS 6 News at 7 p.m. with Bill Fitzgerald on TV, WTVR.com/LIVE or now streaming on Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Apple TV and Android TV. Just search "WTVR Richmond" in your app store.

Friday, Sept. 17: Early, In-Person Voting BeginsThursday, Oct. 12: Voter Registration DeadlineFriday, Oct. 22: Request Absentee/Mail-In Ballot DeadlineSaturday, Oct. 30: Early, In-Person Voting EndsTuesday, Nov. 2 is Election Day: In-Person Voting from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 2: Absentee/Mail-In Postmark by DateFriday, Nov. 5: Absentee/Mail-In Delivered By Date

Read the original:
Why Princess Blanding launched the Liberation Party in Virginia - wtvr.com

Comparing Rand Paul to the Squad is unfair. He doesn’t hate Israel – Haaretz

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has often proved to be a gift that keeps giving for Democrats and a thorn in the side of fellow Republicans.

The stubbornly independent Pauls dogmatic advocacy of libertarian ideas about governance has often thrown a monkey wrench into the plans of the Senate leadership. That proved again the case this past week.

After all the drama about U.S. funding for the Iron Dome missile defense system had already played out in the House, and both Democrats and Republicans were eager to pass the measure and then move on to other issues on which they could resume tearing each other apart. But Paul decided the issue was far from settled.

Exercising his prerogative to overturn a call for unanimous consent which would streamline the legislative process, he objected and placed a hold on the legislation to the frustration of just about everyone else on Capitol Hill.

That earned Paul a condemnatory tweet from AIPAC.

Shots from the lobby at Paul are nothing new.

Of greater interest to the Kentucky politician, who, like most GOP office-holders depends on the backing of evangelicals to stay in office, was the way the Christians United for Israel group, and its leader Pastor John Hagee, went ballistic over the issue.

Hagee, who heads the group that claims to be the nations largest pro-Israel organization said, "Senator Paul needs to stop playing games with the safety of the Israeli people."

But that anger was matched by the barely-concealed mirth of Jewish Democrats whose interest in making a meal of Pauls grandstanding had as much to do with re-establishing a moral equivalence between the parties on Middle East issues as it did with any actual impatience with his stunt.

Democrats have been taking a beating from pro-Israel activists ever since the May conflict with Hamas, which prompted a series of exchanges on the floor of the House of Representatives in which progressives made their distaste for Israel and its policies known.

That was compounded by the embarrassment suffered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who was outwitted by members of her own caucus last month when she tried to slip Iron Dome funding into a House budget bill that raised the national debt limit. But since a considerable number of left-wing Democrats refused to vote for it because they oppose Israel, she had to withdraw it.

Two days later and after a torrent of criticism for being outmaneuvered by members of the so-called "Squad," the House leadership submitted Iron Dome as a separate measure.

Determined to both answer the claims that their party had turned on Israel and to reassert control of their caucus on a budget issue on which freelancing is considered highly dangerous, Pelosi and her team struck back. Using all the considerable leverage and powers of intimidation at their disposal, the whip was cracked and even most progressives fell in line.

In the end, only nine House members voted against Iron Dome, a total that included eight left-wingers and one Republican, fellow Kentucky libertarian Rep. Thomas Massie.

Even the ringleader of the Squad, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) felt the pressure and, at the last minute, tearfully changed her vote from "no" to "present." Though AOC subsequently apologized for a decision for what she described as insufficiently supportive of the Palestinians and critical of Israel, the lesson was learned.

Further burnishing the honor of House Democrats was the speech of Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) who accused another Squad member Palestinian-American Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) of antisemitism for spreading the "apartheid state" lie about Israel.

So when Sen. Paul stopped the Senates approval of Iron Dome in its tracks, Democrats felt vindicated. It's not surprising that Halie Soifer, the head of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, swiftly claimed in a tweet that Pauls actions were actually more damaging to Iron Dome funding than what House progressives had done.

Some went further than that and argued that the fact that the Democrats who tried to stop Iron Dome were criticized with greater heat and with charges of antisemitism while Paul was, at least by comparison, let off with a slap on the wrist. They said that showed how distorted the debate about Israel has become.

Despite the attention given the Squad and its allies, some liberals contended that these events proved that not only was the bipartisan consensus on Israel holding but that any arguments that aimed at showing a real difference between the parties on the Jewish state was misinformation.

But while the Democrats had a point about the damage Paul was doing, the attempt to assert a moral equivalence on Israel inside the two parties is simply untrue. If pro-Israel activists are more upset at left-wing Democrats than they are at the GOPs libertarian outliers, they have good reason for thinking that way.

Though its easy to lose perspective in the heat of political debate, the truth remains that the two parties have largely swapped identities over the last 60 years.

Where once the GOP was split between those who were sympathetic to the Jewish state and a much larger faction that was indifferent or hostile to it, today it is a virtually lockstep pro-Israel party. Most have views on the conflict with the Palestinians that fit in somewhere between the Likud and even more right-wing Israelis like Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.

Even dissenters like Paul and Massie, who oppose aid to Israel, do so on the basis of their opposition to all foreign aid and, will, if asked, speak of their admiration for Israel.

By contrast, the Democrats, who could a generation or two ago, claim to be the home of pro-Israel opinion, are badly split on the issue. A significant portion of its left-wing base looks at Israel through the prism of intersectionality and critical race theory and believe it to be a manifestation of white privilege whose stance toward the Palestinians is no different from that of racists in the Jim Crow south in the pre-Civil Rights era.

Their dissent against the Iron Dome was merely the tip of an iceberg that betrays a growing hostility toward Israel that even some who claim to be Israels supporters like the left-wing J Street lobby are quick to note when they claim that right-wing Israeli policies are alienating Americans.

Among the grassroots activists on the left there is considerable sympathy for the BDS movement as well as for views such as that of Tlaib, who views Israels existence as illegitimate. Though many Democrats disagree and are enthusiastic backers of a two-state solution that now seems more utopian than practical, there is no disguising the fact that, thanks to the increased support for intersectionality on the left, there is a real divide in the party between its establishment members and the Squad as well as many of the members of the 100-strong Progressive Caucus in the House on Zionism.

Even more troublesome is the fact that this divide seems to be largely generational, both among the activists and in the House, where the contrast between AOC and her allies and the octogenarians who still run the House leadership is too obvious to miss.

Given the popularity of the former among both the Democrats cheering section in the mainstream press, and, more crucially, the late night comedy shows, where people like Ilhan Omar, Tlaib and AOC are treated like rock stars, its not irrational to worry that, the recent vote notwithstanding, the left represents the partys future.

And although few pro-Israel activists are willing to say so publicly, most will admit in private that Rand Paul had a point. Israel is strong and rich enough that it ought to begin to wean itself from the constraints of American military aid, even if most of the money is spent in the United States.

While his proposal that Iron Dome be funded out of the allocation of foreign aid to Afghanistan now that it has fallen to the Taliban is a non-starter in legislative terms, its easy to sympathize with it and hardly equivalent to the kind of vicious libels being put about by the left about Israels efforts to silence Hamas terrorist missile and rocket fire.

While the Kentucky senator gave Jewish Democrats a good talking point, that doesnt make up for the fact that a lot of liberals now buy into the arguments that falsely characterize Zionism as a form of racism.

Rather than seeking to pretend that the actions of two neo-isolationist libertarians who are allergic to spending taxpayer money on anything are just as bad as the anti-Zionism and antisemitism that has found a home on the left, Jewish Democrats need to follow Deutchs example and concentrate their efforts on winning back their party from an increasingly influential faction that makes no secret about its disdain for Israel.

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of the Jewish News Syndicate and a columnist for the New York Post.Twitter:@jonathans_tobin

Follow this link:
Comparing Rand Paul to the Squad is unfair. He doesn't hate Israel - Haaretz

Bill Kristol and Scott Horton Debate U.S. Interventionism at the Soho Forum – Reason

On October 4, 2021, Bill Kristol, an editor at large of The Bulwark, went up against Scott Horton of the Libertarian Institute in an Oxford-style debate on U.S. foreign policy at Symphony Space in New York City.

Kristol was a leading proponent of the invasion of Iraq, the founding editor of The Weekly Standard, a foreign policy adviser to John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign, and chief of staff to Vice President Dan Quayle.

Scott Horton is the author of Enough Already: Time to End the War on Terrorism and Fool's Errand: Time to End the War in Afghanistan. He's the editorial director of Antiwar.com and the host of Antiwar Radio and the Scott Horton Show.

The debate was hosted by The Soho Forum, with Director Gene Epstein moderating.

Narrated by Nick Gillespie; production by Four Corners Media; intro edited by John Osterhoudt

Photos: Brett Raney; Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Continue reading here:
Bill Kristol and Scott Horton Debate U.S. Interventionism at the Soho Forum - Reason