Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

What Is Libertarianism? – YouTube

What is Anarchy? : http://testu.be/1afTUo8Subscribe! http://bitly.com/1iLOHml

In the US' two party political system, the other parties are usually overlooked. Yet in the past decades, libertarianism has grown quite popular. So what exactly is it?

Learn More:In search of libertarianshttp://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/... "The question of whether libertarianism is gaining public support has received increased attention, with talk of a Rand Paul run for president and a recent New York Times magazine story asking if the "Libertarian Moment" has finally arrived."

Our Historyhttps://www.lp.org/our-history "The Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the United States. "

Libertarian ideology is the natural enemy of sciencehttp://www.theguardian.com/science/bl... "The observation that science and politics make uneasy and often treacherous bedfellows is hardly revelatory. "

Watch More:What is Anarchy?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM0_0...

Subscribe to TestTube Daily!http://bitly.com/1iLOHml

_________________________

TestTube's new daily show is committed to answering the smart, inquisitive questions we have about life, society, politics and anything else happening in the news. It's a place where curiosity rules and together we'll get a clearer understanding of this crazy world we live in.

Watch more TestTube: http://testtube.com/testtubedailyshow/

Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c...

TestTube on Twitter https://twitter.com/TestTube

Trace Dominguez on Twitter https://twitter.com/TraceDominguez

TestTube on Facebook https://facebook.com/testtubenetwork

TestTube on Google+ http://gplus.to/TestTube

Download the New TestTube iOS app! http://testu.be/1ndmmMq

Special thanks to Lissette Padilla for hosting TestTube!Check Lissette out on Twitter:https://twitter.com/lizzette

Read more:
What Is Libertarianism? - YouTube

The Progressive Libertarian

With Obama's Heath Care Plan dominating the headlines, we have had several questions regarding our stanceon publicly funded health care overall, and Obama's plan in particular.

It is clear that the system is broken and needs to be improved. What we find particularly disturbing in the debate is the number of individuals that are adamant against government funded health care, yet you ask them how they feel about medicaid or medicare and they have a completely different answer - with many even covered by it!

Overall, we would be in favor of a health care plan that is very different from the current system. Fitting with the Progressive Libertarian platform, the goals would be:

* to let the free market operate much more efficiently than the bureaucratic and opaque system currently in place

* encourage individual responsibility and personal choice for health care decisions

* have the government take an active roll in making sure individuals are insured against a catastrophic event

Specifically:

1)All routine expenseswould bepaid out of pocket. If you want to control costs, make individuals take the money directly out of their own pocketto pay for it. This followsour tenet of putting the power of choice to the individual.

2)Increasing "price discovery" for health care services rendered. When was the last time you knew the exact amount you were paying for a medical service rendered? Is there any other item that you can think of that you would buy where you don't know what the cost is? And individuals wonder why health care costs have skyrocketed... "Price discovery" and "comparison shopping"are crucial to make health care a competitive market.

3)Having a government funded mandatory insurance program that covers "catastrophic events." There would be some large deductible -- call it the first $20,000. But, after that the government insurance pool would cover the costs beyond that. Making it mandatory would force all individuals to be covered. This is already done with vehicles and with homeowners. When you really think about it, isn't it actually shocking that it is not mandatory for something aspotentially devastatingas excessive health care costs?

4) Having the insurance program be revenue-cost neutral. Being a mandatory program would disburse the costs across the population andthe goal wouldbe to have it revenue-cost neutral. The key question for society is at what level is the cost-benefit (i.e. taxes vs. services rendered) trade-off maximized.

Overall, the #1 cause of bankruptcy in America is a catastrophic health care event. Having the government provide support for this "Reverse Lottery Ticket" is consistent with the Progressive Libertarian philosophy.This insurancecould still conceivably be done through the private sector as well (as is the case withcar insurance or home owners insurance).

Without question, the crucial and most difficult question of the health care debate -- which surprising no one ever seems to talk about -- is "How much is a human life worth?"There are numerousrelated questions that stem from trying to come up with a quantifiable figure for something that is conceptually very difficult to assign a dollar value.

Specifically, whilewe have the technology to prolong life, there is a cost -- and in some cases, a prohibitively high cost -- in doing so. Obviously, if it is you or a family member that is dying, it is impossible to assign a monetary value to prolonging that life. But, for society and government, there is an inherent trade-off on the tax versus the benefit.

As an example, the value to society in doing an expensive operation to a child is much greater than the value of a similar operation to someone over 70 years old. As such, it makes sense to have an objective rule for the insurance plan that will spend significantly less once an individual is past the "productive" part of the life cycle.

Perhaps surprisingly, there have been a number of economic studies that have come up with implied values that individuals assign to their life, with most ranging in the $50k-$200k range. Such a figure would be an obvious starting point for the discussion of where the cap should take place and the cost-benefit trade-off that makes the most sense for society overall.

Read the original here:
The Progressive Libertarian

The Australian Libertarian Society presents: The 6th …

Join us in Sydney from 25-27 May 2018 for the biggest and best pro-liberty event in the Asia Pacific Region, hosted by the Australian Libertarian Society (ALS) and the Australian Taxpayers Alliance (ATA).

Over 300 activists, thought leaders, business representatives, and political influencers will hear from some of the best speakers from not just Australia, but around the world.

The highlight of the conference will be the presentation of the Annual Liberty Awards at the Gala Dinner on Saturday night.

In addition to the two hosting organisations, the Friedman Conference is supported by a range of sponsors and contributors, including the Institute of Public Affairs and Connor Court Publishing.

Watch this event page for regular updates and speaker announcements. If you have any suggestions or questions then please contact ATA Executive Director Tim Andrews, ALS President John Humphreys, and/or ALS Executive Director Stuart Hatch.

We look forward to you seeing you in Sydney!

Go here to see the original:
The Australian Libertarian Society presents: The 6th ...

Arizona Libertarian Party

Please click on the link below to see all candidates that NEED your help to be included on the Ballot for election. They are standing up for you, your beliefs and principles, and need your support. Tell your friends, family and everyone. It's easy, simply enter your State ID# and your name. You will then get a list of all candidates in your district and you can choose to support them or not with a click or two.

Who We Are

The Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the United States. Millions of Americans have voted for Libertarian Party candidates in past elections throughout the country, despite the fact that many state governments place roadblocks in our path to keep our candidates off the ballot and deprive voters of a real choice.

Libertarians believe the answer to Americas political problems is the same commitment to freedom that earned America its greatness: a free-market economy and the abundance and prosperity it brings; a dedication to civil liberties and personal freedom; and a foreign policy of non-intervention, peace, and free trade as prescribed by Americas founders.

What began with a small group of activists in Colorado has become Americas third largest political party. We are the only political organization which respects you as a unique and competent individual.

Americas Heritage

Libertarians believe in the American heritage of liberty, enterprise, and personal responsibility. Libertarians recognize the responsibility we all share to preserve this precious heritage for our children and grandchildren.

Free and Independent

Libertarians believe that being free and independent is a great way to live. We want a system which encourages all people to choose what they want from life; that lets them live, love, work, play, and dream their own way.

Caring For People

The Libertarian way is a caring, people-centered approach to politics. We believe each individual is unique. We want a system which respects the individual and encourages us to discover the best within ourselves and develop our full potential.

Principled, Consistent

The Libertarian way is a logically consistent approach to politics based on the moral principle of self-ownership. Each individual has the right to control his or her own body, action, speech, and property. Governments only role is to help individuals defend themselves from force and fraud.

Tolerant

The Libertarian Party is for all who dont want to push other people around and dont want to be pushed around themselves. Live and let live is the Libertarian way.

More:
Arizona Libertarian Party

Restating the Obvious: An Open Letter from the Libertarian …

Today (August 12th, 2017), the Unite the Right rally is scheduled to proceed in Charlottesville, VA. The Right being united there isnt just any Right, but one that welcomes white supremacists and self-described fascists. Multiple speakers will say this themselves, and the chants at a chaotic pre-event march the night before included Neo-Nazi slogans.

The purpose of this letter is to clarify the role for libertarianism in this rally which is no role at all.

That clarification is necessary because it might appear otherwise. Three of the listed speakers have at one time or another identified as libertarians: Mike Enoch, Augustus Invictus, and Christopher Cantwell. Mike Enoch previously called himself a libertarian, but now mocks the philosophy as autistic. Augustus Invictus previously attempted to run for Senate through the Libertarian Party. Recently, though, he publicly changed his registration to Republican in disgust. Christopher Cantwell now seems ambivalent about his relationship with libertarianism and anarchism, but his primary identification is with fascism.

Regardless of how any speakers or attendees have identified in the past or present, we want to make clear that this event is not in any way a place for libertarianism. Among libertarians, some identify as right-wing, some as left-wing, and some as radical centrists. Virtually the entire outside political spectrum is mirrored within libertarianism, and this makes for no shortage of infighting. One area where the undersigned have consensus, however, is in a rejection of any attempt to connect white supremacy and fascism to libertarianism. Libertarians, including those who see themselves as on the Right, have no interest in uniting with the horrifically authoritarian Right often called the Alt-Right rallying in Charlottesville.

All this should be exceedingly obvious from even a cursory glance at the two movements.

On a historical note, modern-day libertarianism largely took root in the English-speaking world through Jewish intellectuals, some of whom fled the Nazis. Our movement grew as a revolt against fascism, Communism, and early twentieth-century progressivism. As Thomas Leonard has shown in his Illiberal Reformers, that third enemys intellectual history is closely interwoven with eugenics.

On the level of philosophy, libertarianism stresses the freedom of individuals even when that freedom goes against some supposed collective will. The entire point behind a politics of white supremacy is to replace free association with endless central planning and regulation on collectivist racial grounds. Unite the Right speaker Richard Spencer actively seeks to turn the United States into a 100% white ethno-state. It is impossible to conceive of this happening without a return of the total state and its horrors.

Despite the obvious incompatibility of that totalitarianism and libertarianism (of any kind), an attempted association between the two is unsurprising. Attempts at rebooting authoritarian movements often operate through a tactic called entryism. Entryism is where a smaller political movement attempts to capture a larger one and seize its resources. In cases like fascism and Communism, the tendency towards entryism is probably a joint product of amoral opportunism and an inability to rationally defend their views.

It is necessary, then, for libertarians to restate the exceedingly obvious and insist on the stark differences between our views and those of anyone with any affinity for National Socialist Germany.

We, the undersigned, affirm such a gulf between liberty and its opposite.

To sign this letter, please send your name and any other information youd like to include (such as an institutional affiliation) to libertyagainstfascism at gmail dot com.

SIGNATORIES (updated09/11/2017 if you have signed but dont see your name, feel free to send a follow-up email:

Rhett R. Grassette (Libertarian Party of Louisiana)

Jill Pyeatt

Like Loading...

PublishedAugust 12, 2017September 12, 2017

More here:
Restating the Obvious: An Open Letter from the Libertarian ...