Being Libertarian | Why the Youth in the UK are Generally Left, and Why They Should Prefer Libertarianism Being Libertarian This article looks to examine the reasons why the left has such a clear advantage amongst younger people within society and why those same young people would be more suited towards a libertarian political viewpoint. Perhaps the main reason left-wing ... |
Millennials, millennials, millennials it seems as if we cant ever stop talking about these kids.
As a millennial, I always find it amusing to watch the old guard try so desperately to get a grasp of our motivations and often times our lunacy.
I imagine elders trying to understand the youth of the day is a concept as old as society itself.
I find that most contentions with millennials are precarious in nature, but there is one that I find genuine: the rise of socialism and other Marxist ideas among my peers is downright terrifying.
Many have tried to articulate why this particular ism is so popular with todays youth. Some say its because of a lack of historical and economic knowledge; some say its because of the bleak and uncertain economic future that has been bestowed upon the generation. These points are valid, but I feel they miss the mark almost completely.
Forget about your rationality for a moment and you may be able to see what I see.
I see a generation living in a truly rational era. We are long past God is dead, we are now living on his all but entirely rotten corpse. So very little is intact of the cornerstone of Western society, that it makes sense to me that millennials are the most susceptible (generation) to the dangers of isms because their options are to either grasp desperately to dead ideologies or slip into a dark nihilistic abyss.
How else do you expect us to learn up from down?
The rational mind is a deceptive one. You can make a logical argument for anything there are people actually fighting for pedophile acceptance!
So, therefore, the first man to come along screaming of revolution can take full advantage of the youthful craving to change the world and most importantly give them their first sense of purpose ever.
A purpose is what were looking for, nothing more.
This criticism can be said for anyone who whole-heartedly believes in any ideology; its just that libertarianism, or say, liberalism or conservatism has never killed 200 million people, so Im less concerned with those particular beliefs.
In a post-God is dead society, we will continue to see the rise in utopian ideals and the massacres that come along with those ideals until we find a way to revive God himself with our rational minds.
I understand the criticisms of Christianity; Ive been quite the critic myself. But, Im beginning to understand the father like representative that God is to Western society.
David Foster Wallace once said, The postmodern founders patricidal work was great, but patricide produces orphans.
When you have an overbearing father, the best way to combat his militance is to become strong and independent, to become your own separate entity.
Just because you find your father tyrannical doesnt mean you should murder him in cold blood, youve got to find a way to bring him down to size.
We live in a time where we could be cultivating the greatest minds in history.
Information is abundant and affordable the majority of historys greatest books are available for free, or at most, for 99 cents.
But instead, the youth and the majority of elders are captivated by ideologies and hold no interest in becoming individual thinkers; because that would be difficult, it would require the type of discipline only a father could provide.
* Christian Farrar is a comedian, podcast host, and often times and accidental provocateur. He has been an activist for libertarianism for the last three years.
Like Loading...
What initially attracted you to the liberty movement or to the ideas of liberty?
Whether it was a foundation in the principles of freedom learned from parents or in school, a desire to be rid of oppressive bureaucracy, or a speech (or set of speeches) from Ron Paul or some other advocate of liberty, most likely what attracted you were the ideas, or the picture of the change for good that liberty brings.
There is a movement, a tribe, gathering around these principles, because the ideals of liberty and what they offer to a person are attractive, they are desirable.
I truly believe, from what Ive seen of libertarianism and the rise of the classical liberals and constitutional conservatives, that these ideals resonate with everyone; from Uganda to South Africa, from China to the United States, people have an inherent desire for personal freedom and individual liberty.
Even the leftists, in their misguided ways, often come from a place of desiring freedom, though they tend to pursue freedom for themselves and their allies at the expense of everyone elses freedom. The underlying reasons for why many of them do what they do and fight for the ideals they desire (e.g. equality of outcome), is to bring about what they perceive as greater freedom for the people they consider oppressed.
Liberty is an attractive platform; its an inherent human desire, it just needs to be channeled towards the things that will bring actual liberty.
But, whats one thing thats never influenced you to change for the better? What has the opposite effect, making you shut out an idea rather than causing you to introspect and search yourself, the opposite effect of convincing you to pursue an idea further?
For me, that one thing is someone using a non-argument or insults to tell me that Im an idiot for my desire to make my world a better place. Let me explain.
Imagine you are a person who cares deeply for the poor and downtrodden, youve seen your single mother struggle to survive yes, its not societys fault its circumstance, or your absentee fathers, etc.
But because of her struggle, you have a certain empathy for others who struggle.
You want to see society step in and fill the gap that your extended family and community did not. A part of Americas greatness, that De Tocqueville spoke of, was its communitys involvement with helping the people of the community, being involved in helping the poor, the widows, the orphans, etc.
Maybe you dont understand either the economics nor the philosophical underpinnings behind the future you hope for, maybe you dont understand the blow struck to your own liberty when you involve bureaucracy and power-hungry individuals in more and more of the individuals everyday life. Maybe youve never seen the other side, or have only seen them as those who (because they are able to care for themselves) are too greedy to want to share with others.
So, you support government-run healthcare, you support greater welfare, free (or greatly subsidized) university, and higher minimum wages; you support the governments importing of hundreds of thousands of immigrants and the illegal crossing of many, many, more, because you see them all as people who are struggling without realizing the effects this may have on society.
You look at policy through your lens of struggle and choose anything you think will help change that. You may not even realize how these very policies actually undermine your own goals: as higher taxes, minimum wage increases, and inflation drive prices ever higher, the over supply of labor makes jobs more difficult to find, and the free universities become bureaucratic nightmares, overcrowded and pushing whatever nonsense is expedient to what is politically correct or whatever supports more government intervention and bureaucracy.
You dont realize this.
Rather you just want help for the people you know who are struggling day in and day out to survive, to feed their families, to pay their medical bills.
Then you come across a libertarian, and this embodiment of liberty rather than taking the time to explain to you how so many of the problems youve faced can be solved by introducing more liberty, by an acceptance of more freedom (individually and in the markets).
Rather than showing you whats so amazing about liberty, and how this mindset could help change your life through personal responsibility to help you and those you love drive towards improving your skills and providing value to others; how less government bureaucracy would lessen the tax burden (felt by all) and make reaching that middle-class lifestyle much more attainable; how ideas like the NAP could help curb the incessant appetite for foreign intervention and the costs (of both life and treasure) that come with it, and how so many bad laws and ideas could be changed if they were judged through the lenses of cost to freedom vs improvement of the freedom of others; instead of showing you the reason why so many of us were drawn to liberty, the libertarian calls you a statist or a Marxist and mocks you and your lack of understanding. Or worse, they use a weak strawman argument to point out some fallacy in your ideas.
This libertarian calls you out for being a freeloader, for being a socialist, or just straight up calls you an idiot and then moves on to the next internet debate leaving you with nothing of substance, only a deepened perception of capitalists being assholes and socialists being the ones who care driving you deeper into the arms of flawed logic.
Im not saying its wrong to debate on the internet, and Im not saying that every leftist online wants to objectively approach the ideas of liberty but how many of us were won over from the left or the right, and what was it that won us over? Was it a witty remark, or a really good burn? Or was it a set of ideals that made sense, and that we saw some person or some group of people not only espousing but truly living that set of ideals that showed the true character of what a world with liberty as its core virtue could look like?
Its not good enough to tell someone that their desire for free healthcare is akin to stealing from others to pay for yourself, its not enough to say that Canadas (or Scandinavias) healthcare systems are in shambles, because an objective onlooker would say that they are just fine, and quite frankly cheaper than the convoluted and increasingly bureaucratic systems like Medicaid and Medicare and the slew of insurance companies and bureaucracies in the United States.
But there is an idea to strive for, one where the red tape and government favoritism, the bureaucracy and high tax burden would be done away with; where medicine would be like any other service, subject to the competition of the market that brings lower prices and better services.
We need to remember to promote the goals of liberty and the outcomes that arise from increased freedom.
We need to remember to be the example of what we want to see, and to show that there is an alternative, not just become yet another voice in the cacophony of political bickering.
This post was written by Arthur Cleroux.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
Arthur Cleroux is an individualist who balances his idealism with a desire for an honest, logical and objective approach to politics and political issues. Originally Arthur found that his values aligned well with the political right; however as time went on his desire for transparency and honest discourse of ideas in the political realm led him closer and closer to the center of the political spectrum! He found that on either wing there was a strong and dangerous type of groupthink, where people supported unnecessary and even bad policies because of a need to conform to the party line. As an individualist with a strong understanding of the importance of what Ayn Rand called the smallest minority on earth, the individual; he finds himself falling very closely in line with the ideals of liberty. Arthur is a lot of things but more important than anything he is a father to two amazing children! Caring for them, making sure they know that they are now and always will be loved is his primary goal, and along with that, comes a desire is to raise them to be free thinkers, to question and study the world and why it is the way it is, and to have character and grit to do what is necessary to succeed!
Like Loading...
View original post here:
Libertarians, Don't Become What We Hate About the Left and Right What Are We Thinking? - Being Libertarian
How does the Libertarian Partys 2017 Virginia gubernatorial nominee Cliff Hyra stack up from a progressive, environmentalist perspective? Lets check out his website and other sources, including the Virginia Libertarian Party platform and see (note: my comments in green). Also, for the record, Im all for including Hyra in gubernatorial debates.
Overall, on the issues listed above, Hyra gets 5 in the A range, 2 in the B range, 7 in the C range, 2 in the D range and 6 in the F range, for an overall grade of roughly a C. The reason why Democrats shouldnt vote for Hyra is that some of the areas where he gets particularly low grades Medicaid expansion/health insurance in general, womens reproductive freedom, the environment, guns are very important ones for most of us, while stuff like marijuana decriminalization is great, but not much different than Democratic nominee Ralph Northams position on the issue. So then why choose Hyra over Northam? Got me. On the other hand, perhaps if youre a Republican who detests corrupt crony capitalists like Ed Gillespie, perhaps you should consider a vote for the Libertarian candidate this year?
See the original post:
Grading 2017 VA GOV Libertarian Candidate Cliff Hyra - Blue Virginia (press release) (blog)
A day after the Fourth of July, Trevor Reilly sat at Granite City Food & Brewery crafting plans.
He was looking to make a name for the small, fringe party he adopted after feeling the GOP had turned its back on him.
The Lancaster Libertarian party, which Reilly heads, has started to meet theremonthly since January, looking for ways to grow a party seemingly overlooked in last year's election.
Reilly, a libertarian neophyte and newly ordained political activist, didn't see last year's presidential election as a two-dimensional, "pick-the-lesser-of-the-two-evils" fight between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
Instead, Reilly, a 25-year-old University of Nebraska-Lincoln student and Afghanistan veteran, took a third route campaigning for libertarian candidate Gary Johnson.
"It's like being part of the 'Bad News Bears,'" he said. "You're the underdog."
Being the underdog was a change of pace for Reilly.
Ever since he was eligible to vote, he had always been a staunch Republican, a direct outcome of growing up in a conservative household.
But as the election cycle picked up, Reilly saw himself drawn to the TV more and more watching everything from "Morning Joe" on MSNBC to Fox News.
That's how he found out about the Libertarian Party, eventually deciding to switch affiliations after he said the GOP abandoned the values he held dear like smaller government and fewer taxes.
"More Republicans were straying away from the values, like smaller government, that they used to hold," he said. "This year's election was just a culmination of that."
Reilly has been the head of the Lancaster Libertarian Party since October,spearheading activism previously unseen in the party in Lincoln.
From June 25 to July 2, the party held Freedom Week, devoted to discussing and highlighting libertarian ideals.
Such as smaller government, less taxation, legalization of more recreational drugs, and less bureaucratic meddling in people's lives.
In short, fiscally conservative but socially liberal, Reilly said.
The week culminated in the Rally for Liberty on the north steps of the Capitol, in which around 60 people gathered to discuss and celebrate the libertarian platform.
It's a platform that it is not totally new to Nebraska politics.
In June 2016, state Sen. Laura Ebke of District 32 pulled the same switch as Reilly, ditching the Republican Party for the Libertarians, citing frustration with Republican partisanship.
Reilly plans to organize more rallies not marches, he said to get the libertarian message out.
"Marches don't work to the same extent; they can devolve," he said. "Rallies stay centered on the message."
Concerning the latest uptick in activism in Lincoln and around the country, Reilly said he sees it as reaction to Trump just as the tea party reacted to Obama.
"It's just a side trying to get back at the other side," he said.
As far as his own future is concerned once he graduates?
"Who knows," Reilly said. "I might even run for office someday."
More here:
Newly minted Libertarian feels GOP strayed from small government values - Lincoln Journal Star