Mediaboss Marketing

Another libertarian activist in Cuba may have been taken into illegitimate custody by the Castro regime, his associates in the Partido Libertario Cubano - Jose Marti are reporting.

Partido Libertario Cubano - Jose Mari

Nelson Rodriguez Chartrand, who wrote an article in the PanAm Post which I reported on here last week, about a rebel poster campaign that he was involved in to remind Havana about two other libertarian activists in Cuban custody, Ubaldo Herrera Hernandez and Manuel Velazquez Visea, has himself disappeared.

[UPDATE: Chartrand has reappeared this afternoon, though according to a report from L.P. Nevada activist Zach Foster via other Cuban activists, "After over 24 hours' disappearance, Nelson Rodriguez Chartrand has emerged and is in contact with the party leaders. He was beaten and shaken, but in one piece. The Cuban LP has even more reason now to conclude State Security agents are responsible."

In an IM interview this afternoon, Foster reports via his Cuban sources that Chartrand was "leaving his adult son's house with a box of books to be donated to the new Libertarian Library by LP Spain (P-LIB). The men who attacked him were dressed like common street thugs, but: knew exactly where to find him; they knew what time to find him; they used sophisticated takedown and holding techniques indicative of a law enforcement background; not only did they steal the cash relief money for the prisoner Ubaldo's mother, but...... They stole the libertarian political economy books, and dropped him off stranded in the middle of nowhere to walk back to Havana."]

Back to the original post for the record:

Zach Foster, an American libertarian with the Nevada L.P. who is in communication with the Cuban libertarians, reports at the Libertarian Republic that Chartrand:

disappeared on the night of May 22 under very suspicious circumstances. We in the Cuban LP and LP Nevada believe Nelson was kidnapped on his way home by State Security! The party leaders have searched all the police stations and jailhouses but magically, he's nowhere in the records....

the police have been contacted, but "No crime has been committed; not coming home isn't a crime," and he hasn't been gone long enough yet to be considered a missing person.

Foster reports that State Security officers were seen tailing Chartrand before he disappeared, and that he is not in any local hospitals.

While assuming that someone who doesn't come home has been secretly arrested might seem a baroque fear to an American, as Foster notes "Invisible arrests in the middle of the night are common in Cuba" and he was a part of a poster campaign in Havana that the authorities would certainly disapprove of.

See the original post:
Another Cuban Libertarian Disappeared; His Associates Fear He's ... - Reason (blog)

Student also had her LinkedIn profile posted, called racist

Jessica Murphy, a 20-year-old student at the University of Wisconsin Green Bay, recently published a column that represented the culmination of months worth of work and research, including a dozen public records act requests to the University of Wisconsin system.

Her target? Biased classes offered through the public university system that indoctrinate rather than teach, and degrade capitalism, praise Marxism and encourage a social justice warrior ideology, she wrote in her piece, headlined Top Five Wasteful Classes in the UW System.

Published Monday by the MacIver Institute, a Wisconsin-based think tank that promotes free markets, individual freedom, personal responsibility and limited government, the piece quickly spread through Wisconsinite social media circles.

But it was after Murphys piece, which she wrote as an intern for the institute, landed before a professor whose class was targeted that sparks really started to fly.

On Tuesday, Associate Professor of Philosophy Sarah LaChance Adams posted the article on her Facebook page with the comment: Check it out comrades. LaChance Adams course, Teaching for Social Justice, earned the No. 5 spot on the list.

Murphy, who obtained a copy of the syllabus through one of her public records act requests, noted in her piece that the course hasstudents reflect on their privilege and marginalization. Students also review how meritocracy and the American Dream is a myth. Why work hard to achieve your dreams if you can blame sex/race/class/sexuality for your lack of success?

Murphy added:

A portion of the participation grade is based on whether or not students were inclusive and supported other students expressing their thoughts. This is college, not charm school and these students (and taxpayers!) are essentially paying hundreds of dollars for a course on how to be nice to people.

One of the required readings, Chad Kautzers Radical Philosophy: An Introduction, reviews Marxism, feminism, queer theory, and more. Students are asked to call upon this book for the group presentation, which makes up 15 percent of the total grade.

The course instructor, professor Sarah LaChance Adams, is UW-Superiors Womens and Gender Issues Coordinator. She specializes in feminist philosophy and her current research project is titled An Epistemology of Erotic Errors.

The other four classes on the list are: the History and Politics of Hip Hop at UW-Platteville; Exploring White Privilege at UW-La Crosse; Culture of Third Wave Feminism at UW-Eau Claire; and Class, State, and Ideology: An Introduction to Social Science in the Marxist Tradition at UW-Madison.

Visceral reaction on Facebook

Facebook friends of LaChance Adams did not respond kindly to the article. In the comments, many accused it of being poorly written. Others found it disturbing, suggesting LaChance Adams had been targeted and may need to watch her back. Others accused Murphy of being brainwashed by capitalism.

Some wrote they thought the five classes sounded super interesting. Several poked fun of the entire situation, such as teasing LaChance Adams for only coming in at the No. 5 spot. Said another satirically: Im so disappointed the health class I was required to take as a freshman didnt even get an honorable mention. I literally paid hundreds of dollars to reiterate what I learned for free in my high school health class. Smoking is bad, wear your seatbelt, use a condom.

But some comments got, as Murphy calls it, absurd. Someone posted her LinkedIn profile to the thread with the comment: Shes South African. Keeping up old traditions?

Added another: More than likely with her background, I would not be surprised to learn that she targeted Sarah purposely. Im sure [Professor] Meghan Krausch will be on her list eventually, with all her talk of sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia.

A third person chimed in: I could punch her in the face for you. I can be an academic and respect my upbringing from the barrio.

Professor LaChance Adams liked all the comments.

I am not concerned for my life, but why would you resort to violence when I am just trying to be open with my ideas, Murphy told The College Fix in a telephone interview Wednesday. A lot of these comments are very visceral responses, but that is very typical of the left.

Why attack me?

Murphy said she came across the comments after searching the Internet, curious of the reaction her column was getting.

The personal attacks are unfounded in my opinion, she said. I am a 20-year-old college intern, why attack me? Have an honest discussion about the articles content.

She said someone posting her LinkedIn profile felt a bit stalkerish, and the comments suggesting she is racist for being from South Africa are off base. She moved to America when she was a toddler.

Suggesting she might go after a professor because they espouse sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia is mistaken, Murphy said, describing herself as socially liberal.

She added she supports their right to say and do whatever they wish as an active member of student liberty groups she has even lobbied for free speech rights but added it would be nice if the actual findings in the article were discussed as opposed to personal attacks against its author.

This is a public intereststory

The project aimed to expose one-sided, biased courses, Murphy said.

Starting in February, she and fellow interns scoured class catalogs from all 26 campuses in the system to narrow down their list. Then they used public records act requests to obtain the syllabuses of 12 classes that caught their eye, finally settling on the top five.

The piece was written in a BuzzFeed tone, complete with memes, to attract a wide and unique audience and engage new readers, she said.

She said she acknowledges feedback on the article includes the argument that these five classes offer something of value to students and society.

Thats fine, differences of opinion, Murphy said.This piece is to inform the taxpayers of where their money is going. These classes present a one-sided view.

Murphy called comments that the storyshows she is close-minded ridiculous.

This is a public intereststory, she said.

Her piece ends by pointing out that offering courses that ignore the prosperity created by capitalism and cover absurd topics such as lumbersexuality is not only a disservice to the students paying thousands of dollars to attend a university, but is also a slap in the face to the hardworking Wisconsin taxpayers whose money goes to waste on courses that do not have a direct, positive impact on society.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

About the Author

Fix Editor

Go here to read the rest:
'I could punch her in the face': Libertarian student draws ire for exposing biased UWisc classes - The College Fix

Financial Post

From Libertarian to Populist: Conservative leadership candidates lay down their economic cards Financial Post Maxime Bernier, a Quebec MP known for his libertarian views, opposes agricultural supply management a position few Canadian politicians would ever dare embrace. He is also calling for a revamp of the equalization formula that redistributes wealth ... As it's laid out, Bernier's health-care plan may be electoral poisonMacleans.ca all 41 news articles »

Follow this link:
From Libertarian to Populist: Conservative leadership candidates lay down their economic cards - Financial Post

LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:

By Jordan LaPorta

Forty years ago, pop culture was changed forever by a film most people thought would be nothing more than an ephemeral summer flick. The movies mastermind had minimal acclaim prior to its release, and his biggest hit before 1977 was American Graffiti. But in 2017, Star Wars is now a household name. Its characters have become as recognizable as any in cinema, and its lines of dialogue are co-opted and spoofed on a daily basis.

Almost everyone loves Star Wars, and anyone who does not share that opinion is generally seen as a cultural outlier. Every franchise made since has tried to mimic the success of the space opera saga, but few, if any, have been able to capture the same magic.

Star Wars appeals to people for varying reasons, as the movies tell exciting tales of adventure, romance, and friendship that cut across all ages, races, and backgrounds. At the center of the beloved galaxy far, far away is an idea also similar to that which has also made America great: the idea of liberty.

When people go to the movies, politics is generally not their primary concern. Average, everyday people go the theater to be entertained and escape the drama and perils of real life. What makes movies like the Star Wars saga so successful is their ability to connect with people on a basic human level. Whether hardcore or casual American fans realize it or not, Star Wars taps into key political elements of the American identity that have been present since the Nations founding.

Anyone who has made it farther than grade school knows about the story of the American Revolution. The story was about a land, ravaged by taxes which were being imposed by a distant empire that excluded their voices and oppressed their people utilizing a large police state. The colonists, growing tired, rose up against the British Crown, eventually declaring independence in 1776.

The story is told over and over again in schools, tv shows, and movies. The revolutions heroes are represented on national monuments, the names of cities, and even on our currency. It is a story that Americans cannot escape, and it is a critical part of who we are as a society.

The rebels in the Star Wars universe are hardly different from the men Americans grew up learning about in history books. Like their American counterparts, the Galactic Rebellion opposed a harsh, militaristic, distant Empire, whose harsh tactics were fleshed out in the recent smash hit Rogue One. The Galactic Empire, headed by the tyrannical Sheev Palpatine, used fear to keep the local systems in line.

Palpatines Nazi-like regime employed the iconic storm troopers to maintain its rule, headed by none other than the ruthless Darth Vader. In its short thirty-year reign, the Empire wiped out an entire religious group, established work camps for political dissenters, and oppressed lesser alien species.

The Emperor came to power by consolidating his authority over the original Galactic Republic through emergency war powers. He then mobilized the government against an external threat he concocted, and persuaded the Senate to abdicate its role and reorganize as a centralized empire for a safe and secure society.

Throughout the original six movies (plus Rogue One), the government is the villain, and the heroes take armed action to actively overthrow it. Whether liberals like it or not, the rebellion is a gun-carrying group of ruffians opposed to the evils of an oppressive, overbearing state.

Consider the original cast of characters. Luke Skywalker was a simple farm boy looking for a better life and higher sense of meaning. Han Solo was a shoot-first space pirate who actively ignored the governments rules on intergalactic shipping. Princess Leia was a diplomat who helped organize the rebellion against imperial rule. Obi-Wan Kenobi was a relic of a religious group systematically wiped out by a government looking to avoid conflict. These people despised the Empire, and they dedicated their lives to seeing its violent end.

Perhaps the greatest irony is that the progressive opposition to Donald Trump has dubbed itself The Resistance the same name of the group that succeeds the rebels in the Star Wars sequel trilogy. While Donald Trump is certainly no libertarian, the members of the so-called Resistance are not exactly classical liberals, either. In fact, they prefer centralization, forced conformity, and big government more than almost anyone else just not when the person at the helm is Donald J. Trump. These tactics favored by todays progressive left formed the bedrock of the Empires galactic tyranny.

Americans may not always favor libertarian solutions in practice, but they still look to libertarianism as an ideal to strive toward. No matter how statist a politicians plans actually are, voters always gravitate towards the rhetoric of limited government, personal responsibility, and liberty. It was clear in the words of The Declaration of Independence, and it is still clear today in our love for Star Wars.

May the force be with you.

EmpireGovernmentgunslibertarianismphilosophyrebellionstar wars

See more here:
Star Wars Highlights America's Libertarian Spirit - The Libertarian Republic

The United States Court of Appeals for theDistrict of Columbia Circuit has struck down a regulation requiring ordinary citizens to register drone aircraft.

The May 19 decision stated that the Federal Aviation Administration did not have the authority to regulate model aircraft.

Prior to the ruling, the FAA told the appeals court, it would threaten the safety of the national airspace system if they were to do away with the registration requirement. The reasoning for its nullification was in reference to the 2012 FAA Modernization and Reform Act, passed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama. The law had a rule which stated that the FAA may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft.

All citizens who wish to legally fly a drone are required to pay a $5 fee and register the drone with their name, email address, and home address. They also have to place a registration sticker on the drone with a unique identifying number. This regulation has been in place since 2015.

Failure to comply with the registration would result in up to a $250,000 fine as well as up to three years in prison. The registration must be redone every three years in order to remain compliant. Commercial drones were already under a different set of rules. Currentlythere are about 550,000 registered drones in the USA.

In response to the outcome of the case with the appellate court, the FAA had stated that they are carefully reviewing the US Court of Appeals decision as it relates to drone registrations. The FAA put registration and operational regulations in place to ensure that drones are operated in a way that is safe and does not pose security and privacy threats. We are in the process of considering our options and response to the decision.

The reaction to the decisionregarding the FAA drone regulationmade by the US court of appeals was met with mixed reactions. Those against it said the registration was worthwhile to provide some accountability for individuals who could be reckless and endangering others, whereas the hobbyists, includingJohn Taylor who filed the suit, stated the registration requirement was a burden on hobbyists that Congress did not want to create.

He also stated in an interview with Market Watchthatas of today, no American has been seriously injured by hobby drones, they may get cuts or bruises, but look at ATVs and watercraft, where dozens are killed every year. Its all a reaction to new technology. People are afraid of drones because theyre something new. I just dont see that the risk justifies the action that has been taken over the last 100 years around model aircraft.

The reality of all this fear mongering by government officials is that this is the natural response to all new technology as detailed in aWired Magazinearticle titledWhy the US Government Is Terrified of Hobbyist Dronesas well as Tech Republics12 drone disasters that show why the FAA hates drones.Love them or hate them, they will be here to stay.

It should be noted, however, that the ruling is not yet enforced as the court gave the FAA seven days to consider their current legal options.

Photo: Sukie Kim

This post was written by Alon Ganon.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

Knowledge of Mac, GNU/Linux, Windows but preferring to use GNU/Linux. Bitcoin user and expert, Cyber Punk, Minarchist libertarian, Businessman, Firearm lover, Constitutionalist, and a supporter of Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS).Businessman and IT Contractor by trade available for hire. Specializing in Medical, Dental, and Small Business IT solutions https://alonganon.info

Like Loading...

Read this article:
Appellate Court Lets Your Drone GoUnregistered - Being Libertarian