Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

Why the Left Should Become Libertarian (And Why the Right Doesn’t Want That) – Being Libertarian

Why the Left Should Become Libertarian (And Why the Right Doesn't Want That)
Being Libertarian
I didn't become a libertarian that day (and in fact, I found the aforementioned book to be boring) but I began to see that maybe I wasn't as much of a Blue Dog liberal as I had previously thought. By the time I graduated in 2000, being faced with the ...

Follow this link:
Why the Left Should Become Libertarian (And Why the Right Doesn't Want That) - Being Libertarian

Libertarian Mark Wicks sees shot at winning – Great Falls Tribune

Phil Drake , pdrake@greatfallstribune.com Published 11:26 a.m. MT May 12, 2017 | Updated 1:56 p.m. MT May 12, 2017

Libertarian Mark Wicks says voters have seen and appreciate his common-sense approach to issues.(Photo: TRIBUNE PHOTO/SEABORN LARSON)Buy Photo

Im going to give you an analogy: I see Mr. Gianforte as a luxury car. Its really smooth and comfortable getting down the road, but at the end of the day it just wants to be parked with the other luxury cars down at the country club. And I see Mr. Quist as a little half-ton pickup. Its shiny and bright, has a good sound system, but when you look underneath the hood its only got a six-cylinder, and when you start working, you lose the clutch and there it sits on the side of the road. Now me? Im the work truck. Im the guy that when you are pulled over on the side of the road and youre broke down, you want to see that big pickup pull up behind you that has the tow rope, the chains, the tools, everything to get the job done. And you know youre going to get home that night. So that is what I am asking you Montana, vote for me, send the work truck to Washington to get the work done. Lets quit playing these partisan politics and get something done for a change..

And with that, Mark Wicks described what he believes is on the line in this election in terms that many Montanans could relate to, and which for many was their first look at a third-party interloper.

The Libertarian Party candidates closing comments, now posted on YouTube as Mark Wicks Epic Closing Statement, came during an April 29 debate sponsored by Montana Television News with fellow candidates Republican Greg Gianforte and Democrat Rob Quist during a quest to fill the lone congressional seat vacated by Republican Ryan Zinke who resigned to become the U.S. secretary of the interior for President Donald Trump.

Now all Wicks has to do is garner enough votes in the Thursday, May 25, special election through a party that rarely raises more than a blip on the political radar but yet can serve as a spoiler for other parties in close races.

During the debate, Wicks, 47, played up being a working man, having several jobs and unable because of work commitments to take three-day weekends to go hiking with his wife, Beth, three daughters and a son who range in age from 5-18.

He said he decided to run because he felt the people were not being represented anymore.

I felt I had to step up and do something, he said, adding he didnt feel any better when he looked at who was running for the seat.

So I threw my hat in the ring, Wicks said.

On his webpage for office, he describes himself as Rancher. Family man. Writer. Army Reservist. Third-generation Montana and calls his run for office a David vs. Goliath campaign.

Wicks recounts something that his father, a World War II veteran, said that resonates with him.

He said that he had lived in the best times America would ever have to offer, Wicks wrote. That statement has always bothered me, and Im worried he might be right.

He said if America kept following a road of political correctness and denyingproblems, it will not have a better America for future generations.

I fear we are on the same road as the Roman Empire, which toppled because of largesse, moral turpitude and shortsightedness.

The three candidates, Republican Greg Gianforte, from left, Democrat Rob Quist and Libertarian Mark Wicks vying to fill Montana's only congressional seat await the start of the only televised debate ahead of the May 25 special election, Saturday, April 29, 2017, in Great Falls, Mont. (AP Photo/Bobby Caina Calvan)(Photo: Bobby Caina Calvan, AP)

Wicks said he farms and runs cattle on the ranch his grandfather started in 1913 near Inverness. He works with his family.

According to his website, Wicks had a passion for history in high school, which earned him a scholarship to Montana State University. He narrowed that focus to the history of aviation, then moved to a college in Oregon to study Aviation Technology Maintenance, with a stint in Sweden. In 1991, he joined the Army Reserves, where he served for two years before being diagnosed with a degenerative eye disorder, which he said makes his eyes sensitive to sunlight.

He returned to the family ranch.

Wicks said he has worked on Bakken drilling rigs, driven propane trucks, owned gift shops, sold family produce at farmers markets, and wrote a novel, Wrath of the Dodo, which looks at the family farm in a dystopia setting.

Wicks may be at a disadvantage in terms ofname recognition as Gianforte, a high-tech entrepreneur from Bozeman, is likely familiar with Montana voters from his unsuccessful run for governor in November. And Quist, who has performed statewide for decades as a musician and with the Mission Mountain Wood Band, also is well known in Montana.

A political observer gave Wicks little chance of winning the election, saying he has not received much public attention and has insufficient campaign financing to get his name and message out.

A third-party Libertarian candidate, even in Montana, is almost always relegated to single digits and often low single digits in the percentage of votes cast, said Jeremy Johnson, associate political science professor at Carroll College. I dont expect Wicks to be a factor in the race unless Gianforte and Quist run almost even against each other.

Johnson said Wicks, presumably, will take more of the vote away from Gianforte than Quist if this were a strictly Republican-Democratic race, but that is not assured.

Mark Wicks, standing, addresses Montana Libertarians gathering for their partys nominating convention on March 11 in Helena.(Photo: AP File)

I expect Wicks to receive about the same share of the vote as most Libertarian candidates who have limited name recognition in previous elections have received. Its an uphill battle to effectively challenge the two major political parties in Montana as well as throughout the United States"

Wicks said he is in the race to win and calls Quist the spoiler in his election.

In November, Zinke, a Republican, was re-elected to the congressional seat with 56 percent of the vote. Democratic challenger Denise Juneau received 40 percent and Libertarian Rick Breckenridge, who entered the race late due to the death of Libertarian candidate Mike Fellows, got 3 percent of the vote.

For comparison, in the secretary of state race, Libertarian Roger Roots got 3 percent of the vote.

Robert Saldin, an associate professor of political science at the University of Montana, puts Wicks chances of winning at zero percent.

But he has an opportunity to get out the Libertarian message and to demonstrate that his party has a future in Montana politics after longtime standard bearer Mike Fellows' death, he said. He had a very strong showing in the debate.He could also tip a close race to Quist.

Saldin said he expected Wicks to get in the mid-single digits is most likely on May 25. High single digits would be a fantastic showing for him, he said.

He also said that Wicks helps Quist, adding not all Libertarian votes would otherwise go to Gianforte because some would go to Quist and some wouldn't vote for either major party candidate.

But Libertarians definitely hurt Republicans and help Democrats, he said.

Johnson noted that from what he gathered, Wicks has aligned himself ideologically much closer to Gianforte than Quist.

The Libertarian Party, now the third-largest political party in the United States, was founded in 1971 in Colorado Springs, Colo., by David Nolan, a political activist, and some friends, according to the website Ballotpedia. Nolan opposed the Vietnam War and President Richard M. Nixons wage and price controls. The Libertarians, who say they are committed to free-market principles, civil rights, personal freedom, non-interventionism, peace and free trade, had their first national convention in 1972.

As of July, 144 Libertarians held elected offices in 34 states, including three state legislators in Nevada, Nebraska and Utah. The party has affiliates in all 50 states and more than 250,000 registered Libertarian voters nationwide, Ballotpedia stated.

On their Montana website, Libertarians said they believe in the American heritage of liberty, enterprise and personal responsibility. Libertarians recognize the responsibility we all share to preserve this precious heritage for future generations.

Libertarians believe that being free and independent is a great way to live. We want a system which encourages all people to choose what they want from life; that lets them live, love, work, play, and dream their own way.

Michael Fucci, communications director for the Montana Libertarian Party, said they believe their candidate is a breath of fresh air.

His straight-forward manner and willingness to provide real answers to tough questions stands in stark contrast to the typical, overly rehearsed approach offered by the other candidates, he said in an email.

Wicks admits he has lofty goals in seeking victory May 25.

Its always tough for a third party to win. The dice are always loaded for Democrats and Republicans, he said.

He said the good thing about being a Libertarian is how many people do not know they are Libertarian until they research it.

Ive had numerous people say Ive been Libertarian all along, he said, adding he believes in fiscal responsibility.

Wicks said his dedication to fiscal responsibility brought him a lot of attention.

People after the debate saw I was a common-sense person and very forthright and honest, he said.

Wick said his fundraising picked up after the debate, not any million-dollar contributions, he said, still a few thousand dollars, it goes out as soon as it comes in.He estimates he has about $5,000 in his campaign war chest.He hopes the national party will donatefunds to help him.

In terms of what he is hearing on the campaign trail, Hands down its health care, he said, adding its followed by public land, veterans health care andeducation.

He said the luxury car, pickup truck and work truck analogy came to him a couple days before the debate.

As a farmer, I have a lot of time to think, going around in circles in a field, he said. People really latched on to it and understood what I was saying.

Weekends are now spent traveling around the state. On Saturday, an ugly truck contest was scheduled for Whitefish.

The Whitefish Pilot reported people were invited to have pictures taken with Wicks and his work truck. The contest will feature three categories: ugliest truck, fanciest truck and most serious work truck. Winners would receive a Wicks for Congress T-shirt.

In terms of what happens May 25, Fucci said its in the hands of folks casting ballots.

This is up to the voters to decide, he said. There are three candidates on the ballot, and as with any special election, the outcome is unpredictable. Mark Wicks has a strong message that rings true with many Montanans, and we expect considerable support as they head to the polls.

Here are comments from Wicks regarding some of the top issues during the campaign:

Public land: I would like to see access at least as good as it is now or better. He said its a bad idea to close roads so people cannot get in to fight fires or manage the land. He said claims of selling off national parks or wilderness are not going to happen.

Health care: Repeal it and get the federal government out of there. I dont think they can handle it and react to changes fast enough to make it work. He said it needs to be fixed and costs need to be bought down. I am not a fan of one size fits all solutions to anything.

Gun ownership: He said the National Rifle Association does not rate third-party candidates. But he said he has been in the gun industry for 20 years, selling at gun shows or online. He said there is no bigger supporter of the SecondAmendment than he.

Abortion: I dont make either side happy. With my views I believe people have a right to choose. He said he does not support late-term abortions. Id like us to do as much as we can for fewer abortions. He said he has a position paper on this subject on his Facebook page.

Trump budget: How is it different from any other budget in past? It does not matter if we send a Republican or Democrat to Congress, they will produce a spending plan that is over budget.

Transgender bathrooms: He said this was the first time he has been asked this question on the campaign trail: If you are wondering which bathroom to use, just call your mother and I think she will tell you.

Read or Share this story: http://gftrib.com/2r8QtZk

Go here to see the original:
Libertarian Mark Wicks sees shot at winning - Great Falls Tribune

The Lowdown on Liberty: Just How Are We Supposed To Survive Without Regulation, Mr. Libertarian? – Being Libertarian


Being Libertarian
The Lowdown on Liberty: Just How Are We Supposed To Survive Without Regulation, Mr. Libertarian?
Being Libertarian
This week there was a common trend among questions, so I decided to address the elephant in the room that seems to bother most unfamiliar libertarians, which is: how exactly would things in our life function without the overbearing, gluttonous ...

Read the original here:
The Lowdown on Liberty: Just How Are We Supposed To Survive Without Regulation, Mr. Libertarian? - Being Libertarian

The Chief’s Thoughts: No Libertarianism Without Individualism – Being Libertarian


Being Libertarian
The Chief's Thoughts: No Libertarianism Without Individualism
Being Libertarian
Individualism is the fabric of which libertarianism is made. Rather than being a substantive tenet per se, instead it permeates all of libertarianism's overt principles, from the non-aggression principle to argumentation ethics to private property ...

Go here to read the rest:
The Chief's Thoughts: No Libertarianism Without Individualism - Being Libertarian

Delusions & Shortcuts: The Left Is Right – Being Libertarian

I can not fully express how happy I am the French presidential election is over. That isnt to say Im pleased or unhappy with the outcome; I could care less which socialist was elected to be the new captain of a still-sinking ship. What Im happy about is I wont have to hear or read any more libertarians blithering on about and praising either Marine Le Pen or Emmanuel Macron.

If Macron winning causes some libertarians to think cooler French heads have prevailed, then I have a bridge to Galts Gulch to sell them. Macron is typically described as a moderate and centrist, yet he will supposedly preserve the status quo, meaning maintain the policies of lame duck President Franois Hollande, a socialist whose approval ratings rival those of George W. Bushs outgoing numbers. Yet, minutes after he won, plenty of libertarians were commenting that France has somehow been saved from Le Pens jackboots.

Many libertarians championed Le Pen despite her promise to close borders and withdraw from global markets; distrust of commodities speculation; advocacy of expanding entitlements for native French citizens; opposition to freedom of religion for Muslims who dont shoot up cafes and nightclubs. A friend of freedom Le Pen aint, but, hey, at least she wants to leave the EU!

My fellow libertarians who have been so inexplicably invested in the French election: what makes Le Pen offensive and Macron acceptable, and vice versa? They are both socialistic statists, and seem to differ only in their proposed responses to Islamic terrorism, which are about as opposite as can be. Le Pen wants to keep out Muslims who try to emigrate to France, while bestowing upon existing French Muslims second-class status; Macron, following the latest terror attack there, rhetorically threw up his hands, and said, This imponderable threat, this threat, will be a fact of daily life in the coming years. How are either Macron or Le Pen acceptable executors of the proper roles of government, which is to protect life, liberty and property? Libertarians by and large decry voting for the lesser of two evils, yet they shelved this for the French election.

***

Another reason Im happy the French election is over is that the MSM and liberals can focus on something other than the far right Le Pen. They are still literally shaking from the election of a supposed xenophobe to the White House that they now need to obsess over far right politicians in other countries to virtue-signal they are not racists. See, see?!?!? Theyre all like that!!! they huff under their shrines to Ted Kennedy, President Obama, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, who are all more responsible for initiating and maintaining legal immigration quotas and bureaucracy than they are advancing freedom of movement.

The run up to the election has been one collective social media circle jerk of an anti-tautological argument that got me so angry I almost went full Sylvia Plath; since everything else about Le Pen indicates left-wing positions, when friends on Facebook describe Le Pen as far right, I ask them to name one country run by a far left government that has open borders. So far, no one has replied to my query.

If the French election has taught us anything, its that the left/right paradigm is obsolete. It no longer lends itself to accurate descriptions of political ideologies that way it used to, and applying the American context and understanding of the formulation to European politics is similar to how you need an adapter for power outlets when you travel there (sorry not sorry for what may or may not be a mixed metaphor).

Words usually evolve slowly, but the meanings of certain words commonly employed in political vernacular morph relatively rapidly. To further complicate things, different regions that share a common language can have different meanings for the same word. Conservative and liberal mean different things around the world, and even among Western democracies and republics. Hell, capitalization can affect definition: Democrat, Republican, and Libertarian dont mean democrat, republican, and libertarian, respectively, just as Democrat and Republican are not always synonymous with liberal/progressive and conservative.

(That these terms are easily confused by individuals with pedestrian knowledge of political ideologies should be especially obvious to we libertarians since we have an unhealthy obsession with fact-checking those on the left and right, and nitpicking what libertarianism is. Many libertarians engage in this ironic exercise of patting themselves on the back for being so principled and consistent, yet indulge this urge to tell anyone who listens what makes them so libertarian. I swear to Thoreau, libertarians are as self-absorbed and needy as vegans [I hope I never meet a libertarian vegan, I dont want to endure seven hours of what makes that sad, sorry son of a bitch so unique]. If you want to prove you are some ideological stalwart and/or hold the moral high ground, stop constantly refining your positions; it makes you seem unsure of yourself.)

***

UNITED AIRLINES WATCH 2017 UPDATE:

Im going to take you back to the subject of French morons to close out this column. The flying PR nightmare that is United Airlines is in the news yet again when a frog named Lucie Bahetoukilae flew to San Francisco instead of France:

According to Bahetoukilae, who speaks only French and allowed her niece to speak on her behalf, the airline changed the flights gate at the last minute, and failed to notify the passengers via email. Furthermore, Bahetoukilae claims the airline did not announce the gate change in French, despite the original flight being bound for Paris

Bahetoukilae, not knowing any better, gave her ticket to the gate agent, who then scanned it and allowed Bahetoukilae to board.

Upon arriving at her row, however, Bahetoukilae found another passenger seated in her spot. Confused, she showed her ticket to a flight attendant, who, instead of noticing the airlines error, simply sat Bahetoukilae in an empty seat.

Bahetoukilae then embarked on a 7.5-hour flight in the wrong direction. When she arrived in San Francisco, Bahetoukilae then endured an 11-hour layover as United tried to place her on another flight to France. In total, she spent more than 28 hours trying to reach her initial destination.

That she was neither beaten or left to die in a cargo hold counts as stellar customer service by Uniteds standards.

Look, all seriousness aside, some of the blame for this belongs to Bahetoukilae. She should have known she was on a flight to Frisco instead of Paris when all her fellow female travelers were wearing paisley dresses instead of burkas.

Of course, United has to shoulder most of this responsibility since their employees, through their neglect, allowed Bahetoukilae to board and remain on the flight. But its very easy to blame airlines since they are corporations (boo, hiss!) that sell their customers a hassle-laden product and lose sight of the fact that so much of what they do is governed by federal agencies like the FAA and TSA. Would removing government oversight fix every problem with the airline industry? Of course not. But loosening up some of the regulatory strangleholds would help loosen up some of the chokeholds airlines pass on to their passengers.

***

And thats the way it is, as far as you know.

Photo: Cafedodu.com

This post was written by Dillon Eliassen.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

Dillon Eliassen is the Managing Editor of Being Libertarian. Dillon works in the sales department of a privately owned small company. He holds a BA in Journalism & Creative Writing from Lyndon State College, and needs only to complete his thesis for his Masters of English from Montclair State University (something which his accomplished and beautiful wife, Alice, is continually pestering him about). He is the author of The Apathetic, available at Amazon.com. He is a self-described Thoreauvian Minarchist.

Like Loading...

See original here:
Delusions & Shortcuts: The Left Is Right - Being Libertarian