Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

What I Saw at the Anti-Milo, UC Berkeley Riots! – Being Libertarian

Ticket screening was supposed to begin at 7:00 pm, so at around 6:15 pm I started walking up Telegraph Avenue towards the event at the Pauley Ballroom on the UC Berkeley campus. On my way there, I was already seeing ubiquitous anti-Milo Yiannopoulos signs calling this gay, Jewish, immigrant (who predominantly dates black men) a Nazi, a fascist, and many other unoriginal epithets sufficient to excite the decently large low information crowd around here.

I continued on through Sather Road coming closer to the Ballroom venue. I briefly walked into the supposed ticketing area, by the Amazon store, to get a better idea what was happening, but rioters were already throwing rocks, paintballs, and burning objects in that direction. Some of the store windows had been smashed in or blown out completely, barricades were torn down, and the attendees were totally exposed to the rioters standing a little further North (behind some weak metal barricades that were going not to last much longer). To me it was not clear where we were supposed to stand or have our tickets screened, it was all very chaotic, and things began to get dangerous for event attendees.

A big fire had erupted near where I stood because rioters had thrown a Molotov cocktail at a container that seemed to be leaking gasoline. At some point I heard a loud explosion, maybe even two. Firecrackers were continually being thrown in the general vicinity and a lamp pole had been torn down to the sound of cheers. The Cops were mostly inside the buildings staring outside, but they were not intervening at all as far as I could see. Id say there were about 30-40 cops, vs hundreds if not thousands of rioters and supporters.

I tried to connect with a fellow Being Libertarian writer in attendance, but it was difficult to find one another and his phone was dying.

Virtually everyone I saw, across the entire area all the way back to Bancroft & Telegraph, was excited, happy, giggling, taking photos, and basically having quite a blast. Behind the front line of rioters there were drummers, and a DJ, there was a real dance party going on. After theyd officially succeeded in shutting down the event, naturally followed by massive cheers of joy across what seemed like the entire campus, they broke through the barricades completely and moved towards Telegraph & Bancroft.

The rioters, who largely consisted of masked individuals brandishing Antifa flagpoles, lead the march; they were accompanied by continuous drum beats, hip hop music, and people dancing behind them, I could hear a rap song with the profound hook line Fuck Donald Trump.

Having attended alone, Id now successfully connected with another person on the events Facebook group and we met up on Bancroft and Sather Lane (note: its Lane now, not Road). Thats when the atmosphere turned from dark to terrifying!

Suddenly serious scuffles started in that area, Antifa rioters began to chase down, or sucker punch, Trump supporters and Miloattendees. I heard one Antifa protester, a woman, proudly proclaiming Hey, we found a bunch of Nazis over there! I saw a small group help a woman who was wearing a Make Bitcoin Great Again hat, who had been sucker punch pepper sprayed during a TV interview by a masked individual.

I saw one guy, surrounded by Antifa rioters, getting bludgeoned really bad as more backup, armed with flagpoles that were gratuitously utilized, came flooding in from behind. I suspect thats the body I later saw in this footage, where you can see him motionless on the road, surrounded and beaten with a flapole some more for good measure. I wonder if hes alive.

I saw two Trump supporters, one wearing a MAGA hat, chased down Bancroft Way towards Dana Street by another Antifa mob who were shouting things like Beat his ass!, and Get out Nazi scum!.

Here you can see the official protest organizer, Berkeley school district teacher Yvette Felarca, (who recently returned to her job after having been placed on leave pending an investigation into concerns that have been raised) explain how doing whatever is necessary to shut down Milos event is their right to self defense, thus clearly condoning the violence, arson, and destruction; how else would they have shut down the event? Its good to know that this unstable, and insecure cliche of a mental patient, is instructing children with your tax dollars, isnt it?

At this point I, and the friend Id made here, somehow got pepper sprayed or tear gassed, were still unsure where it came from. There was no police presence at all around here. With impaired vision, we fled in a direction that seemed to be the safest way to escape the violence.We managed to connect with a few more friendly event attendees down the street and exchanged experiences and information before we got out of the general area. It was a crazy night!

Heres an official legal definition of terrorism from Merriam Webster:

terrorism the unlawful use or threat of violence especially against the state or the public as a politically motivated means of attack or coercion.

In my opinion, this was not a protest, this was not even just a riot, this was well planned and coordinated domestic terrorism! The same kind of terrorism that we can [currently] observe all over the Western world, with matching signage, symbols, names, weapons, flags, strategies, chants, intimidation techniques, violent professional agitators, and so on.

So why not deal with it accordingly? How much longer will this behavior be tolerated?

If youre interested in more discussion on the topic, here is my call in to Freedomain Radio, together with my friend:

And here is a recorded conversation with another friend regarding the event, including some footage that he mixed in:

This post was written by Nima Mahdjour.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

Nima is an entrepreneur and Bitcoin advocate who writes about economics and freedom. He was born and raised in Berlin and received his Master's degree in the US in 2004. He co-founded an auction software company in San Francisco and successfully sold it in 2015. (Twitter: @economicsjunkie)

Like Loading...

More here:
What I Saw at the Anti-Milo, UC Berkeley Riots! - Being Libertarian

Libertarian Party Gets Win For Fair Debates – Being Libertarian


Being Libertarian
Libertarian Party Gets Win For Fair Debates
Being Libertarian
Currently, the CPD requires a candidate to have 15% approval rating from five national polls. During the last election, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson was close to reaching the benchmark but was shy by 3 percentage points. Furthermore, candidates ...

More here:
Libertarian Party Gets Win For Fair Debates - Being Libertarian

A Warning From A Spanish Libertarian – Being Libertarian (satire)


Being Libertarian (satire)
A Warning From A Spanish Libertarian
Being Libertarian (satire)
On January 22nd 2017, I woke up early to catch up with some work. As I turned my computer on, I saw a Facebook post shared by a friend. It was a video showing a group of masked men and women beating a 20-year-old girl to a pulp. What was going on ...

Originally posted here:
A Warning From A Spanish Libertarian - Being Libertarian (satire)

Why Trump’s First Few Actions Already Matter – Being Libertarian

On the day of President Trumps inauguration, the WhiteHouse.gov website was completely stripped of its previous build (which was archived as Obamas White House on a separate URL) and a new set of Issues were listed on behalf of the Trump administration. Conspicuously absent? LGBT issues, civil liberties, and the environment.

Many Trump apologists made excuses for this, claiming that since the new administration had to start from scratch, it would take time for them to fully flesh out the website. I agree which is why the Issues page was the only completed page upon the new WhiteHouse.gov launch. The rest of the site remained bare, but for a very specific reason, the Issues page was revamped and presented as a complete whole in the new website build. Trump wanted his voters (and the American people at large) to get familiar with the issues that most concerned him, and so it is clear that his transition team had already prepped this particular page of the website ahead of time so that the American people would at least have something to look at upon their new president taking the all important oath.

Considering this, the excuses dont hold any water if Trump truly wanted to say something reassuring to the LGBT people of America, who have publicly expressed fear of this new administration, he would have made sure it was included in his new Issues page. He didnt. Which means hes indifferent toward this demographic at best.

Now, to be fair, Trump did say pro-LGBT things during the campaign, and there was recent news that his administration would continue the lawful protections against active discrimination that Obama had previously put in place for gay and trans employees, etc. And thats all wonderful. I dont actually believe Trump is the boogeyman the liberal press has spun him into. However, the fact that Trump doesnt think LGBT issues are worthy of having a voice in his main advertised agenda is still a problem. It indicates, if nothing else, that our new president is ignorant to the true will of the people. Hundreds of thousands of gays, women, blacks, Latinos, and American-born Muslims are publicly crying out at the moment because they are genuinely afraid of Trump.

And what has Trump done to bring the American people together, considering this? Has he publicly stated on his website that he will continue Obamas LGBT protections? Has he publicly clarified that his recent executive order regarding Muslim immigration is only temporary, and only applies to non-American Muslims? No, he has not. And he should, if he intends on dispelling the ore exaggerated claims about him. Why he has yet to do so is trouble, because it is indicative of a lack of empathy or awareness of the unrest found in large portions of the people he claims to now represent and protect.

Is our president truly this tone deaf? Is he really so unable to understand that a simple addition to his website, a simple White House statement, a single tweet., etc. could start to make the difference and ebb peoples fears? Who cares if many of said fears were kicked up by the media unjustly? That ship has sailed, and the currently reality is one of fear, paranoia, and violence. If President Trump were truly presidential, he would be making his positions much more clear, and he would be reaching out to all Americans (not just in a general statement, but in direct addresses to specific demographics) to assure them that he is going to preserve their rights as well as the rights of their straight, male, white fellow citizens. Equally. With liberty and justice for all.

Until the President can do that, which is now warranted considering the hostile climate that has been kicked up by partisan fear mongering and demagoguery, then he has not earned the privilege of actually being referred to as presidential. Because being president is more than just the actions; it is also the words. Kennedy and Reagan spoke to their citizens like brothers and sisters is a common quest for liberty and greatness; Trump trashes people on Twitter for making harmless jabs at his expense. The bar has fallen significantly. And we are likely going to spiral further into chaotic unrest and heterogeneity as a result.

Brace for impact.

This post was written by Micah J. Fleck.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

Like Loading...

Read more from the original source:
Why Trump's First Few Actions Already Matter - Being Libertarian

Progressives are Retreating to Federalism: Ironic, but an Opportunity – Being Libertarian

The Democrats have been decimated nationally and now face a national government controlled, in all three branches, by Republicans. In response, quite cynically, theres been a revival of a certain states rights mentality among liberals.

In sanctuary cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Oakland, mayors have boldly stated that they will not cooperate with federal authorities seeking to deport undocumented denizens. Like Loretta Lynch, under Barack Obama, Trump has said he will cut off federal funds to cities that do not submit to federal will.

Democrat Governors like Dan Malloy and Jerry Brown are saying they will challenge federal laws, and progressive groups are looking to the states more and more to get what they want.

I may not like a large chunk of the liberal agenda but, if there are other folks who want to help shift the field of battle from the national to the local level, Ill take it.

Since FDR, progressives and liberals have pushed for an ever-greater centralization of authority; but in the age of Trump, it will be Republicans who reap what Democrats have sown, and liberals are cowering.

Libertarians are the truest champions of political decentralization, and if liberals want to serve our ends we should let them.

If the centralization of authority that liberals have pushed for over the decades is still around after theyve lost power; then, by that logic, the decentralization they cynically retreat to, when theyve lost elections, can remain when they inevitably get back into power only to find that power has been oh-so-beautifully diminished.

We can use liberal angst against big government nationalistic Republicans today, and use the fruits of liberal rage against incumbent progressives tomorrow.

We libertarians should use the changing battlefield to our advantage. We should be part of the push to shift politics to local and state levels, and then use that opportunity to seek power at lower-level offices that are more easily influenced by insurgent movements like ours.

Libertarianism has often been described as the perpetual ideology of the opposition in the United States, and federalism doubly so. As the biggest advocates for the nationalization of politics suffer the effects of their disastrous ideology, lets take the opportunity to prevent them from being able to do much damage down the line.

Jacob Linker is a Campus Coordinator with Students For Liberty and the State Chair of Young Americans for Liberty in his state.

Like Loading...

See the article here:
Progressives are Retreating to Federalism: Ironic, but an Opportunity - Being Libertarian