Libertarian Kennedy Montgomery: disclosing CEO to worker pay ratio is "slut shaming"
Libertarian Kennedy Montgomery says that forcing public companies to disclose CEO-to-worker pay ratio is "slut shaming." The type of Reason Magazine Trash Fox News Pulls straight from Youtube.
By: antilibertarian
Here is the original post:
Libertarian Kennedy Montgomery: disclosing CEO to worker pay ratio is "slut shaming" - Video
The Libertarian Angle: Charlie Hebdo
Each week, FFF president Jacob Hornberger and FFF vice president Sheldon Richman discuss the hot topics of the day. This week: the attacks in France on the offices of Charlie Hebdo. The Libertaria...
By: The Future of Freedom Foundation
See the article here:
The Libertarian Angle: Charlie Hebdo - Video
The Libertarian Reaction to Free Community College
You would think conservatives and libertarians would love vouchers and school choice so much that they would all be over this. Nope. Julie #39;s video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqBv3CEyM6Y...
By: Ryan Wiley
See the original post:
The Libertarian Reaction to Free Community College - Video
Ask Fat Libertarian Dude
I want to try something new. I would like to give my viewers an opportunity to ask me questions that I can answer in an upcoming video. I would prefer these questions be specifically about...
By: Feddy Fredrickson
Continue reading here:
Ask Fat Libertarian Dude - Video
January 14, 2015|9:31 am
U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, gives remarks at the Heritage Foundation's Conservative Policy Summit in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday, January 13, 2015.
WASHINGTON United States Senator Rand Paul stated that "judicial activism" can be a force of good in American politics.
At an event sponsored by the conservative group the Heritage Action for America, the outspoken libertarian-leaning Republican told those gathered Tuesday morning that judicial activism can play a positive role in public policy.
"There is a role for the Supreme Court to mete out justice. The Fourteenth Amendment gives the Supreme Court, gives the federal government a role in saying the states can't do certain things," said Sen. Paul.
"I think the federal government was right to overturn state governments that were saying that 'separate but equal' was fine'."
Paul believes that the conservative position that judicial restraint was intrinsically beneficial was wrong given the need for decisions to combat state-level wrongs like Jim Crow legislation.
"If you're for judicial restraint, I guess then what happens when a legislature does bad things?" asked Paul to an audience that has often expressed support for restraint over activism.
"What happens when a legislature says 'well, we're going to pass Jim Crow laws' should we have an activist court that comes in and overturns that?"
(Photo: The Christian Post)
See the rest here:
Rand Paul: Judicial Activism Can be a Good Thing