This publication is fond of running stories asserting that Canada is in the doldrums. To many, Canada seems broken.
Rather than despair, we should listen to Paul Wells: We must all abandon hope for a brighter past. The question is what any government can do next.
As the resident misfit libertarian, I am contractually obligated to say something about that government part. But I think that Wells characteristically puts his finger on something important.
Id amend it to this: We must abandon all hope of a past that could give us an easy solution now. The question is, Whats next?. When answering that question, theres no getting around politics.
When a normal person says politics, they mean partisan politicscampaigning for offices, donating to or joining a party, standing for electionor pressure campaigns targeting politicians. Unburdened as I am by concerns about normality, I want to expand our idea of politics.
Not everything is politicalin fact, in our frustration at what feels like a broken system, we too often stick politics where it doesnt belong. But non-political social and community activities form the backdrop for our politics.
Identifying a community problem and trying to solve it, either individually or as part of a group, doesnt just address that problem. Individuals and groups trying to solve social problems demonstrates that those problems can be addressed. People learn about the problems their communities face, and theyre armed with skills for tackling those problems. Addressing community problems also builds community and social capital.
Taking a slightly different approach: having hard conversations about important topics and facing when we might be wrong isnt just good for us as individuals. It affects how public opinion is formed because we and the people we talk to are part of the public.
These activities dont have to be purposefully political to change how we think about social problems, how to prioritize them, and how to solve them. And thinking about, prioritizing, and imagining solutions to social problems seems to be where Canadian politics is coming up short. When people look to their political leaders for what to do next, and political leaders are looking at opinion polls for directionwell. Its not surprising if it doesnt go anywhere.
In the U.S., politicians are compensating for a lack of direction with a culture war. We dont have to take that path. Nor do we need a new vision to get behind, and we shouldnt want one. We need solutions to problems. We need to better judge when politics might help and when politics needs to get out of the way.
Here is where I meet my contractual obligation: I dont think we can expect any government to change substantially unless Canadians are willing to put demands for specific goals and accountability for achieving them ahead of their disdain for the other side.
Libertarians believe that governments do the things they do badly. The libertarian solution to unsatisfactory governments is to replace as many of the actions taken by the government with voluntary solutions as possible. But while its uncontroversial to say governments arent doing the things Canadians want, the usual conclusion is that the governments need more capacity, not fewer responsibilities.
We live in a liberal democracy. If libertarians want responsibilities taken away from the government, we have to convince people that responsibilities should be taken away from the government.
Michael Munger, an economist at Duke University (and repeat candidate for government offices), argues that not just libertarians but all people who want the government to work differently face the same problem. The laws and institutions we have exist because people have either pushed for those laws and institutions or are used to them as they are. Its easier to get everyone to agree that things generally arent working well than to agree about reform. For any particular change, some people will show up to defend the part that works well for them. The sum of that opposition makes change hard. Change only happens if people who want change are as motivated as people against it.
The idea that change means motivating a lot of people or changing lots of minds, rather than just convincing a few politicians, feels overwhelming. But things have been worse than they are now, and people made them better. Big, overwhelming problems are made of small parts.
Its the fact that some of the most basic problems arent being solved that makes everything feel so broken. Regardless of whether youre skeptical of government overall, we should be skeptical about whether governments are the only appropriate tools for solving basic problems.
People who exercise their civic muscles by tackling the problems they see in society are more fit for the political action necessary for a working democracy. The urbanist Jane Jacobs wrote, When humble people, doing lowly work, are not solving problems, nobody is apt to solve humble problems. Jacobs observed that people who get involved in their community can become fixtures for more community action, potentially creating a virtuous cycle of participationand public accountability.
Jacobs herself famously lead community opposition to city-level development that would have bulldozed what people wanted for their own neighbourhoods. But in The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jacobs also talks about humble people solving other problems. For example, English-speaking parents organizing to help the children of immigrant parents with English-language homeworkan initiative Jacobs sister-in-law travelled around the city to help spread. In our own time, community fridges come from ordinary people trying to make sure everyone has enough food. YIMBY groups are a new political force working to change the politics around home building.
Ordinary people can and do address the basic problems facing society.
To join them, we can start small. Join a Janes Walk in your city to learn more about your neighbourhood. Look for volunteer opportunities at your library or food bank. Does your street participate in a neighbourhood yard sale (could it)? Contact the organizers of projects that exist in other cities that you wish could exist where you live.
Get curious about one thing you disagree with and find someone who believes it to help you understand. If youve got a point of view you dont see represented, learn to write an op-edand write one! Dont take things working well for granted. Things that are working well could probably also use your help.
And heres something anyone can do: when you see someone trying something that you dont think will work, dont berate it or tear it down. Try to appreciate good intentions and that people are trying. We need more people trying.
Brokenness feels big. These things feel small. But they flex important social muscles that are weak, maybe especially weak since the pandemic. They prepare us for when we will need to be even stronger than before.
Link:
There's no getting around politics - The Hub