Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

A Dream and a Lie: Ron DeSantiss Twisted Race Pedagogy – The Nation

Florida Governor Ron DeSantiss legislative crusade against Black history in Floridas K-12 curriculum is nothing short of a frontal assault on Black Americans sense of reality and identity. History in American education is not, as DeSantis suggests, an impartial assemblage of the cut and dried facts. It is, rather, the way we test and refine various narratives of our collective identity and national aspirationsand, crucially, interrogate the enabling fictions that make up the American dream. James Baldwin underlined the central fact that DeSantiss campaign against Black learning sidesteps during his 1965 debate with William F. Buckley Jr. at the University of Cambridge when he declared, The American dream is at the expense of the American Negro. Fifty-eight years later, Ta-Nehisi Coates reiterated the same point in his landmark book Between the World and Me: Historians conjured the dream.

By forbidding instruction in the countrys actual history, via everything from Floridas ban on critical race theory to the abandonment of advanced AP classes in African American history, DeSantis has reversed this foundational insight, conjuring the dream as state-sanctioned knowledge. Florida schools now operate under the mission to present students with a largely anodyne, conflict-free, and mythologized account of racial history as factand as the foundation of their civic identity.

This ideologically driven agenda gives the lie to DeSantiss frequent insistence that Floridas education standards require teaching Black history. In point of fact, the standards require no such thing; they categorize African American history as an elective. In other words, while schools may be mandated to offer such courses, no student is required to take them. This procedural dodge, like so many of DeSantiss pronouncements, is meant to preemptively disarm criticism: If he can make it seem that African American history is already required for all Florida students, the advocates of the woke sensibility DeSantis reviles will appear to be distorting the truth in the alleged service of their ideological agendas.

That was the whole point of DeSantiss high-profile press conference on the states teaching standards earlier this month, where he denounced the case made by his detractors as a hoax. They will say things like Florida does not want students to know that there was slavery in the United States, which is just an absolute lie, DeSantis said. Florida law does the opposite.

Well, not so much. Its true that a 1994 state law requires Floridas public schools to teach African American history, including the enslavement experience, abolition, and the history and contributions of Americans of the African diaspora to society. Floridas Department of Education lists six African American history courses that meet the requirements of the 1994 law, but none of these courses fall under the heading of core-curriculathe body of classes students must take in order to graduate from high school.

DeSantis is correct when he says that students will learn about enslavement if they enroll in the course. However, thanks to his moral-panic legislation specifying which versions of Black history pass muster in state schools, he has also ensured that students will not learn that white people were responsible for it, or that white people benefited from it and produced white children who inherited their wealth from the plunder of enslaved Black Americans. The upshot is a mind-bendingly ahistorical proposition: White supremacy did not empower white people with the belief they were sanctioned to enslave Black people. Rather, American racism was an outlying and irrational product of now-outmoded pseudoscientific beliefs and attitudes, which no longer play a central role in American race relations, if indeed they ever did.

As DeSantis explained, this flattened-out account of the countrys racial past was the objective behind his signature Stop WOKE legislation, HB 7, which he signed into law last year. What we did in that bill, DeSantis explained, we required the State of Florida schools to provide instruction about prejudice and racism through American history. He neglected to add, however, that the bill charges educators to handle this material under the prime directive of guaranteeing that no white students feelings are hurtor, as the bills sweeping language has it, to ensure students do not feel guilt, anguish, or psychological distress because of actions, in which the person played no part, committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, national origin, or sex.

What students are clearly empowered to feel, however, is that the whole awkward business of American slavery and its apartheid aftermath is firmly embalmed in the past: After stipulating that its permissible for Florida classrooms to explore how the individual freedoms of persons have been infringed by slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, and racial discrimination, the Stop WOKE Act rushes to stress that students should also learn how recognition of these freedoms has overturned these unjust laws. Note first that the abstract formulation here absurdly bypasses the explicitly racialized foundation of slavery; Black people were not dispossessed, exploited, and killed by slavery so much as the individual freedom of persons was, most unfortunately, infringed. And likewise, Black Americans were not the agents of their own liberation under the demise of slavery and segregation; no, the impersonal and abstract recognition of these freedoms was the efficient cause here, a bloodless account of how history actually unfolds that would make even Hegel blush.

We are, in short, in the pedagogic world of right-wing agitpropwhich is the ultimate aim of DeSantiss education platform: to depoliticize actually existing Black history in the name of preserving the dreams core ideological precept of white innocence.

Its not hard to work out the implications of this counter-historical curriculum in the arena of todays multifront campaign to restore white impunity. By this same impersonal libertarian logic, white men can intentionally hunt and shoot down a Black teenageras Florida vigilante George Zimmerman did when he gunned down Trayvon Martin in 2011without white supremacy playing any part in the adjudication of the gunmans legal culpability. The ideological focus on individual freedoms will likewise automatically transpose the acute wealth gap separating white and Black America into the high-libertarian scheme of proper saving and investmentas opposed to the legacy of system in which Black Americans were themselves designated property, and thus denied fundamental human rights of self-determination and unobstructed social mobility. In short, students will be encouraged to believe that Black subjugation, the torture of the whip, and the hell of poverty wereand arenecessary torments that Black Americans simply must overcome in order to finally realize for themselves the spoils of the American dream.

In line with all this reasoning, the only time Floridas social studies standards refer to white people as a race is to exalt white allies in the civil rights movement, advising teachers to have their classrooms assess the building of coalitions between African Americans, whites, and other groups in achieving integration and equal rights. In other words, while the mere mention of past white culpability for, and complicity in, American slavery and its legacies would create severe emotional distress and dislocation for white students, they still can claim the heroic narrative of playing a leading role in dismantling the outmoded regime of Black repressioneven though this, too, is an assertion squarely at odds with actual history.

Readers like you make our independent journalism possible.

Add to this DeSantiss repudiation of AP Black history instruction for alleged indoctrination in Black resistance and critical race theory and you have a version of Black history that dogmatically minimizes Black experience and historical agency. This vision is part of DeSantiss broader effort to adopt the teaching standards of fundamentalist Hillsdale College in Florida schools, via public-funded charter institutions. DeSantiss alliance with Hillsdale, indeed, predates his governorship, going back to his tenure in Congress. Hillsdale now has the authority to review Floridas middle-school civics curricula in conjunction with the commissioner of education and the Koch-funded Bill of Rights Institute. Another group charged with such reviews is the Florida Center for Joint Citizenship, which is a partner of the University of Florida and the University of Central Florida, schools that both receive generous Koch funding.

The tight network of right-wing policy entrepreneurship supplies the rhetorical and intellectual artillery for DeSantiss school wars. You can see its influence, for example, in the way the Florida Department of Education took issue with the AP courses proposed inclusion of the Movement for Black Lives in its instruction materials. Department officials claimed that the aims of Black Lives Matter include eliminating prisons and jails, ending pretrial detention, and concluding the war on Black trans, queer, gender non-conforming, and intersex people.

Its also why DeSantis took up the same rallying cry at his March 8 press conference. You just tell me whether you think this is something that is appropriate for an African American history course, DeSantis asked, reading aloud this description of the now-rejected Queer Studies unit the original AP Black history framework: We have to encourage and develop practices whereby queerness isnt surrendered to the status quo of race, class, gender and sexuality. It means building forms of queerness that reject the given realities of the government and the market.

While such language may be imprecise and rhetorically overblown, the objectives in question are indeed of a piece with the struggle for racial justice, as any number of queer Black Americans will readily attest. But the whole point of DeSantiss curriculum-scrubbing agenda is to deny such people a voice, a hearing in public lifeor, indeed, an identity.

Neither they, nor the larger narrative of Black liberation, have any place in the states own preferred indoctrination narrative, grounded in the sacred shibboleths of individualist achievement. Florida law requires the State Board of Education to develop or adopt Stories of Inspirationa curriculum designed to inspire future generations through motivating stories of American history that demonstrate important life skills and the principles of individual freedom that enabled persons to prosper even in the most difficult circumstances.

And while queerness has no place in the DeSantis-ized version of Black history, laissez-faire capitalism most assuredly does, in spite of capitalisms largely adversarial role in the Black freedom struggle. The African American History task force, an organization created by the 1994 law to bolster the effort to ensure the history, culture, experiences, and contributions of African Americans is taught in Floridas K-12, ensured that the states African American Instructional Standards are teeming with the fables of Black capitalism. The task force enjoins teachers to have students analyze the advantages of capitalism and the free market in the United States over government-controlled economic systems, while also rehearsing the dogmas of classical laissez-faire economics: Students will analyze the disadvantages of authoritarian control over the economy (e.g., communism and socialism) in generating broad-based economic prosperity for their population.

The libertarian civics mandate yields a prim and didactic vision of Black success that is quite something, but a far cry from history:

The economic and human resources of African Americans in the United States of America are significant. African Americans, since Madame C.J. Walker, have been millionaires and today there are many millionaire athletes, businesspeople, performers, and T.V[.] personalities like Oprah Winfrey. The exploration of economic contributions is important in understanding the roles of African Americans in American society.

There you have it: The Black struggle for justice, freedom, and equality culminates in the billionaire figure of Oprah Winfrey, a perfect market avatar of the American dream of individualist uplift. The version of Black history that Florida students will now be encountering in schools overseen by fundamentalist ideologues calls to mind Hannah Arendts grim assessment of how totalitarian propaganda prompts people to believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. Thats yet another lesson that wont be taught in a Florida school.

See the original post here:
A Dream and a Lie: Ron DeSantiss Twisted Race Pedagogy - The Nation

Missouri House committee rejects call for recount in close St … – Missouri Independent

On a party-line vote, a Missouri House committee on Wednesday rejected a request for a recount in a legislative district decided by 99 votes in the November election.

Democratic members of the Special Committee on Election Contests voted against the decision to deny a recount. Majority Republicans said they opposed the recount because the challenger, Democratic nominee Cindy Berne, did not allege any irregularities in her loss to Republican Adam Schwadron in the 105th District in St. Charles County.

We have tried in every way we could to evaluate what has taken place, said Rep. Dan Stacy, R-Blue Springs, who served as the chairman of the committee.

Under state law, a candidate who loses by less than 1% of the vote has the right to ask for a recount. The margin in the 105th District was 0.91% of the 10,951 votes cast. Schwadron received 5,404, or 49.35%, to Bernes 5,305, or 48.44%, with Libertarian candidate Michael Carver picking up the remainder.

In its report to the House, the committee focused on the issue of irregularities, noting that Berne had not alleged any. Various state statutes, the report states, indicate that the committee has discretion to turn down the request if the person contesting the election hasnt shown that there is uncertainty about enough votes to potentially change the outcome.

Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said Berne deserved a recount even without an allegation of issues with the vote.

That is not what we should be focused on, Collins said.

The statute on recounts where the margin is less than 1% says the losing candidate shall have the right to a recount, Collins noted.

The gist of this is that they are owed a recount because it is less than 1% and that is whats in statute, she said.

Republicans on the committee pushed back, saying that the recount is discretionary when there are no other issues raised about how the election was conducted.

It should be used sparingly when there are not irregularities to point to, Rep. Peggy McGaugh, R-Carrollton and a former county clerk.

Stacy said extensive research showed that other statutes describing the circumstances triggering a recount and governing the power of the committee gave it the ability to turn down Bernes request.

I believe we have been very thorough, Stacy said. I feel we have followed the statute.

The Missouri Constitution makes the House the sole judge of election contests for its members. There is no right to appeal the committees decision to the courts.

If a recount had overturned the result, it would have been the fourth seat picked up by Democrats from the 2022 election. There are 52 Democrats and 111 Republicans in the 163-member House.

See the original post:
Missouri House committee rejects call for recount in close St ... - Missouri Independent

Dusty Johnson gets second nod as ‘most effective House … – Argus Leader

Darsha Dodge| Rapid City Journal

South Dakota's lone congressman has been named the "most effective House Republican" on agriculture for the 117th Congress, according to the Center for Effective Lawmaking.

It's Dusty Johnson's second time in a row receiving the honor.CEL also ranked him 14th out of his 222 House Republican colleagues.

Agriculture is the top industry in South Dakota. My focused efforts to represent our producers well have delivered results to the industry, Johnson said. Im proud to be named the top House Republican in Agriculture policy and will continue to work hard for South Dakota.

During the 117th Congress, Johnson was the Republican lead on many bills passed, including theOcean Shipping Reform ActandStrengthening the Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Act.

Other bills were implemented administratively by the agencies they affected, an often faster process than waiting for Congressional passage. TheFEEDD Actexpands relief under the federal crop insurance program, while theCattle Contract Library Actincreases transparency for producers by allowing them to view price components from different packers.

Johnsonsecured his third term in a landslide victoryover Libertarian Collin Duprel in November. Now months into the 118th Congress, Johnson continues to prioritize his agriculture work in the legislature. It's his third term serving on the agriculture committee, a vital seat on the national stage to represent South Dakota's number-one industry, especially in a year where Congress has to renegotiate the Farm Bill.

Since the session began on Jan. 3, Johnson has re-introduced two cattle-focused bills aimed at helping the ag industry theButcher Block Actand theA-PLUS Act. TheButcher Block Actassists new or expanded livestock or meat processors, allows for financing of cooperative stock and establishes a rural development grant program.The U.S. Department of Agriculture implemented a pilot program mirroring that legislation in July 2021.

He's been outspoken about Chinese Communist Party influence, noting repeatedly that "food security is national security." Johnson is one of 24 lawmakers appointed to the Select Committee on China; he questioned CCP involvement in America's agriculture and farmland productionduring the first hearing on Feb. 28.

Johnson recently visited Wall, wherehe and USDA Under Secretary Xochitl Torres Small toured Wall Meat Processing. Co-owner Ken Charfauros said the demand for locally sourced meat has exceeded the capacity of their 2,400-square-foot processing plant. Charfauros and the Wall Meat Processing team have expanded with their subsidiary, I-90 Meats, to create a 30,000-square-foot plant in New Underwood.

I-90 Meats received a $3.3 million federal grant to assist in the plant's creation, a direct impact from Johnson's legislation.

See the original post here:
Dusty Johnson gets second nod as 'most effective House ... - Argus Leader

Nikki Haley: Our Republicans Added to Our Debt Crisis – Yahoo News

Presidential candidate Nikki Haley on Monday laid out her plan for tackling the border crisis and the nations debt during a town-hall event in Dover, N.H.

I dont know that our kids are ever going to forgive us for this, Haley said of the nations $31 trillion in debt. Its easy to blame Biden for that, but our Republicans did that to us too, and we need to acknowledge that.

She pointed to the $2.2 trillion Covid stimulus bill that was passed in 2020 with no accountability.

It expanded welfare. We now have 90 million people on Medicaid in this country. Weve got 42 million people on food stamps, she told a full house at Dovers Restoration Church. And so what did Republicans do? Did they try and stop and correct? No, Republicans in Congress doubled down and for the first time in ten years, they went back to earmarks. Seven thousand earmarks they passed through . . . this past December.

Dont let them ever tell you Republicans and Democrats dont agree on anything, because they love wasting our money, she said, before again renewing her call for term limits and competency test for politicians over the age of 75.

If elected, Haley said she would vetoany spending bill that doesnt take us back to pre-Covid levels.

I balanced a budget in South Carolina. You balance a budget at home.Our businesses, we balance budgets. Why is Congress the only group thats exempt from doing that? We have to start balancing a budget, she said. To address the nations finances, we must also undertake entitlement reform, she added.

One such reform, she said, would be raising the retirement age for kids in their 20s, limiting benefits for the wealthy, changing the cost of living to more closely reflect inflation, and expanding Medicare Advantage programs.

National Review spoke to voters across the political spectrum who turned out to see Haley, most of whom said it was too early to say which candidate they will support in 2024. However, all said that the economy and inflation are among their top concerns.

Story continues

I love Nikki Haley. Ive been following her since she was in government elsewhere, and so I love her, but I want to hear what other people have to say before I make a decision, said one conservative resident. But I definitely am impressed with her so far over the years.

Diane Weir, a libertarian, said the Republican field looks good and that it has been nice to watch somebody confident like Haley.

She didnt dodge questions. I appreciated that, she said. I also thought the last time I heard [Republican senator] Tim Scott interviewed, he sounded very good. And of course, Im intrigued by Vivek [Ramaswamy.]

She cited the economy and the amount of drugs coming over the border as her top concerns but said she has reservations about Haleys neocon side and her hawkish positions on Ukraine.

Beth Voce, an independent, said she is interested in the prospect of a female candidate for president because Im tired of the good old boys system that is not working for our country.

So Im very excited, she said. Nikki Haley has a good reputation and has proven results.

Elaine Teeters said that she and her husband are still just feeling things out. She said she loves Governor Chris Sununu but would hate to lose him to the presidency. Her husband, John Teeters, said he voted for Trump in 2016 but he didnt vote for him in 2020 and wont vote for him in 2024.

John Teeters said he might trust Vice President Mike Pence to tone down the divisive rhetoric between the parties but added that Pence is a little far right for him. He would be interested in supporting a presidential run from former representative Liz Cheney.

Meanwhile, Haley today also unveiled her plan to tackle the border crisis, another top concern for many voters at the event.

Congress has let us know that they are incapable of figuring anything out, so we have to tell Congress what they need to do, Haley said, telling the engaged crowd at the church that Congress must pass mandatory E-verify to prevent businesses from hiring illegal immigrants.

She pointed to its successful implementation in South Carolina, where she was governor from 2011 to 2017. They left South Carolina because they couldnt get a job, she said.

She also said the government should hire an additional 25,000 Border Patrol and ICE agents instead of spending money to hire the additional IRS agents called for in the Democrats Inflation Reduction Act.

There should be no more money going to any illegal immigrants in this country whatsoever, she said. Other points in her agenda include a return to Trumps Remain in Mexico plan and the continued use of a Title 42 public-health order that allows for quick expulsions of illegal immigrants.

I will tell you the one thing that youre going to see in America when Im president, were going to stop catch and release and were going to start catch and deport, she said.

See the original post here:
Nikki Haley: Our Republicans Added to Our Debt Crisis - Yahoo News

Is It Wise for Governments To Encourage Fertility? – The New York Sun

Around the world, population growth rates are declining, and in many countries fertility rates are sufficiently low that the population is shrinking. Fertility decline has been happening for centuries in America and other developed countries, but it has recently attracted renewed attention. Liberals and conservatives alike, albeit for different reasons, have rallied around policies that might increase fertility, such as expanding the child tax credit or implementing federal paid family leave.

In Libertarian Land, a different perspective obtains: governments treat having children as a private decision whose main costs and benefits accrue to the individual or couple in question. So, as with other personal decisions, government avoids policies that discourage or encourage fertility, as either kind can generate undesirable outcomes from a personal or societal perspective.

This approach does not deny that having children might benefit society overall. Some evidence suggests that a higher population generates more innovation and technological progress. A larger population would mean a larger workforce and greater economic output, which might facilitate national defense or trade negotiations.

Yet a larger or faster growing population can have negatives as well. Under existing policies, a larger populace means higher costs for funding public schools, social services, and old age benefits. A higher population, other things equal, means more pollution, crowding on highways, and carbon emissions. Absent conclusive evidence regarding the net benefit or cost, therefore, policy should neither penalize nor subsidize fertility.

This perspective implies scaling back or eliminating numerous policies that subsidize children, such as the child tax credit. At the same time, it suggests eliminating policies that raise the costs of having and raising children.

Examples include occupational licensing, zoning, and immigration policies, which raise childcare costs; land use regulations, which raise housing costs; import tariffs on food and baby formula; and even excessive child safety regulations, including car seat requirements that increase financial costs but provide little associated safety benefit.

This laissez-faire perspective also recommends other smaller-government reforms that would make family life easier, including expanded educational choice, reasonable independence laws that allow children to play outside and walk to school alone, and protecting independent contractor status which facilitates flexible work schedules and working from home rather than imposing employee status, as proposed in both state and federal initiatives.

Even if increased population nets out as beneficial, population policies have serious potential for unintended consequences. The one child policy in mainland China led to sex-selective abortions and, decades later, a population decline that worries current leaders. Prohibitions on birth control that aimed to increase birth rates in Romania led to a surge of orphans. Although draconian policies are not currently being proposed, dasnt policymakers forget that meddling in personal areas of life can have damaging consequences.

Considerable evidence, moreover, suggests that pronatalist policies have limited influence on fertility and little long-term effect; often they increase fertility in the short-term by moving births forward in time for couples already planning to have children; thus, these policies do little to increase long-term fertility once births revert to baseline. Instead, these policies mainly transfer wealth to persons who want children from the general population, which may explain their political popularity.

None of this is meant to discourage having children or to raise warnings about population growth. The Malthusian prediction that growing populations would produce mass starvation made when world population was 1 billion, compared to almost 8 billion now has proved stunningly wrong.

The lesson, however, is not that we need policies to promote population growth but instead that neutral policies regarding private fertility decisions would be better. Government does not know best, and even if it did, past efforts to manage population have had limited effect at best and catastrophic outcomes at worst.

In Libertarian Land, policy makers recognize the limitations of population policy and instead liberate families by removing the many and varied government-imposed obstacles to family life.

Original post:
Is It Wise for Governments To Encourage Fertility? - The New York Sun