Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

Iowa Republican, Libertarian, and Conservative Leaders Endorse Rob Sand for Auditor – River Cities Reader

DES MOINES, IOWA (October 7, 2022) Rob Sand for Iowa announced the endorsement of 31 Republican, Libertarian, and self-described conservative leaders from across the state today. The list includes current and former elected officials and candidates, Republican Party of Iowa staffers, and private sector leaders.

Rob has put Independents, Republicans, and Democrats in senior leadership in his office, and is willing to defend the other party or criticize his own even outside of his official duties, said Mike Mahaffey, former Chairman of the Republican Party of Iowa. Iowans need an independent, assertive State Auditor. I have known Rob since his days as an Assistant Attorney General. Rob is a good public servant who strives to serve all Iowans regardless of who they are or which party they belong to. He reminds me of former State Auditor Dick Johnson, a Republican who had the respect and admiration of people across the political spectrum.

Rob Sand understands why people are fed up with politics and strives to do things differently, said State Representative Dave Maxwell (R-Gibson). He serves the public interest, not partisan interests and works hard to protect the taxpayer. Common-sense Iowa voters can be confident in the work Rob Sand is doing as Auditor.

You can trust divisiveness and politics-as-usual is out the window when you see Republican, Libertarian, and conservative leaders all supporting a Democrat, said Sand. Our anti-partisan approach identified more than $25 million in misspent funds, created a government efficiency program so good the State Auditor of Mississippi copied it, and held insiders of both parties accountable. Ill continue that work in my second term if awarded one by voters.

List of endorsements*

*Organizations are for identification purposes only and do not constitute the endorsement of that organization of Rob Sand for Iowa

CURRENT AND FORMER ELECTED OFFICIALS

Aaron Alons, former Sheldon City Council Member, OBrien County

Wayne Barahona, former Sheldon City Council Member, OBrien County

Michael Bawden, former Mayor of Riverdale, Scott County

John Ellingson, former Waukon City Council Member, Allamakee County

Larry Keller, Clarke County Supervisor

Skip Lowe, former Tama Council Member, Poweshiek County

Tina Meth Farrington, Calhoun County Attorney

State Representative Dave Maxwell, Poweshiek County

John Mickelson, Former West Des Moines City Council Member, Polk County

Jared Rosien, Mayor of Washington, Washington County

J Scott Raecker, Former State Representative, Polk County

Clint Sargent, Former Mayor of Missouri Valley, Harrison County

Walt Tomenga, Former State Representative, Greene County

Sheriff Jeff Vandewater, Adair County

CANDIDATES

Marco Battaglia, Libertarian Party of Iowa Candidate for Lieutenant Governor, Polk County

Joseph Howe, Former Chairman of Libertarian Party of Iowa, Polk County

Jake Porter, 2018 Libertarian Party of Iowa Candidate for Governor, Pottawattamie County

Rick Stewart, Libertarian Party of Iowa Candidate for Governor, Linn County

REPUBLICAN PARTY, BUSINESS & COMMUNITY LEADERS

Mike Mahaffey, former Chairman of Republican Party of Iowa, Poweshiek County

Steve Noah, Former Executive Director of Republican County of Iowa, Polk County

Georgia and Mark Brown, Eagle Tool Company Owners, Dubuque County

Brian Downing, High School Principal, Dickinson County

Bob Downer, Former Republican Party National Convention Delegate, Johnson County

Mark Hanawalt, Former Chair of Iowa Association of Business and Industry, Bremer County

Bob Haney, Agribusiness leader, Warren County

Aaron Juergens, Iowa Pork Producers Board Member, Carroll County

Capt Terry LeMaster (ret.), Council Bluffs Police Dept, Pottawattamie County

Drew Skogman, Linn County

Dave Zrostlik, Former Chair of Iowa Association of Business and Industry, Hancock County

Tim Grover, State Director Restore Liberty Iowa, Jackson County

Mike Sylvester, Director of Grassroots Outreach, Iowa Pork Producers, Polk County

See the original post here:
Iowa Republican, Libertarian, and Conservative Leaders Endorse Rob Sand for Auditor - River Cities Reader

Libertarians hope to make difference in tight election year – GPB News

The major party candidates running for Georgias top elected positions have become household names, but when voters enter their polling places next month, they will encounter some names that have not been blaring from their TV speakers or plastered across their social media feeds.

The Libertarian Party of Georgia is fielding candidates for senator, governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, commissioner of agriculture and commissioner of labor.

You probably wont need to memorize any of their names they are all polling below 10%. But the candidates could mix up the race by forcing a runoff, and they are hoping their presence will shift the political conversation in Georgia toward what they see as a focus on personal freedom and limited government.

The most important thing about the Libertarian Party platform is lower taxes, less government intervention, not necessarily in that order, said Ted Metz, who is running for secretary of state against Republican incumbent Brad Raffensperger and Democratic challenger state Rep. Bee Nguyen.

Like any party, Libertarians vary in their beliefs. But generally, they call for slashing taxes and eliminating government regulations ranging from drug and gun restrictions to minimum wage requirements and other labor standards.

If we were actually ever elected to office, we would follow through on our promise to lessen the footprint of government, said Metz, who ran for governor against now-Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, and Democrat Stacey Abrams in 2018. Of course, the GOP talks about lowering taxes and reducing the size of government, but you know, what? Government keeps growing, and the tax burden keeps growing. So essentially, were saying that the other parties are not not truthful in their claim to want to lower taxes, reduce the size of the government.

Shane Hazel, who is running for governor, said more people seem to be open to the partys message of limited government, especially after the 2020 pandemic lockdowns and the ensuing economic strife.

Democrats and Republicans, they lock people down, he said. Brian Kemp here in the state of Georgia locked it down. Republicans said nothing. Brian Kemp called us non-essential, allowed bureaucracies to invade our businesses. They bragged about record tax revenue during that same time, and during that time, millions of people lost their livelihood and lost family members.

Kemps 2020 executive ordersdeclaring a public health state of emergencyand ordering residents to shelter in place referenced Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state public health department findings on the then little understood disease. Georgia was among the earliest states to resume normal activity, a fact Kemp often cites on the campaign trail. The state department of health has confirmed more than 38,000 COVID-19 deaths in Georgia.

Still, some Georgians remain steamed over the fact that the government had the power to institute the restrictions in the first place, Hazel said.

Personal freedom, in times of remarkable strife and emergency, is the path, and the powers were never delegated to the government to destroy your rights because of a quote-unquote emergency they get to declare, Hazel said.

Libertarians usually garner only a fraction of the overall ballots cast, but with tightening margins in Georgia, they may continue to force runoffs.

An Atlanta Journal-Constitutionpollconducted last month by the University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs gives Hazel .5% of the vote, while Kemp leads with 50.2% and Abrams trails with 42.2%. All of Hazels support in the survey comes from self-described Republicans.

In 2018, Metz fell just shy of 1% of the vote in his campaign for governor.

Libertarian gubernatorial candidates have fared relatively better in past elections. Garrett Hayes won 3.8% of the vote in 2006 against Republican Sonny Perdue and Democrat Mark Taylor, and John Monds won 4% in 2010 against Republican Nathan Deal and Democrat Roy Barnes. Between 1990 and 2002, the Libertarian candidate picked up about 2.5% of the vote.

The decline in vote share may simply be a result of the millions of dollars the major parties have spent on advertising, said University of Georgia political science professor Charles Bullock.

Four years ago, the down-ticket Libertarians outperformed Metz amid a similar record-setting spending spree for the governors mansion, Bullock said.

The voter who simply doesnt know that much about the Democrat and Republican, doesnt have strong feelings and therefore wants to go with a libertarian. Had the libertarian for governor done as well as the average for libertarians that year, it would have been a runoff, Bullock said.

With Kemp hovering just above the all-important 50% mark, a December runoff is a possibility this year. Hazel said its highly unlikely that he would endorse either Kemp or Abrams, but added that he would invite them both to make their case on his podcast, Radical with Shane Hazel.

A runoff seems more likely in the race for the U.S. Senate, with Libertarian Chase Oliver earning 3.2% of the vote in the AJC poll. Democratic incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock has 44.2%, trailing Republican challenger Herschel Walker with 45.8%, but other recent polls give Warnock a slight edge. If those results hold, Warnock and Walker would be forced into a December runoff.

Walker, a former UGA football star, is beloved by many but entered the race with significant baggage, including a lack of political experience and accusations of domestic violence.

I think in that situation, what were seeing is that while some Republican voters have qualms about voting for Herschel Walker, theyre not going to vote for Raphael Warnock, and so they can safely park their vote there with a libertarian, Bullock said. They dont have to make a hard choice between a Republican about whom they have serious concerns and a Democrat whose policies they reject.

The UGA pollsters found that Oliver had the support of 5.2% of self-described Republicans, 5.4% of independents and .9% of Democrats.

Down the ballot, Libertarians are performing slightly better, which could presage runoffs in those races as well. Lieutenant governor candidate Ryan Graham has 7.6% of the vote against Republican state Sen. Burt Jones and Democratic candidate Charlie Bailey, who have 43.4% and 33.1% respectively.

Metz scored 6.3% of the vote against Raffenspergers 49.9% and Nguyens 30.8%.

And in the race for attorney general, incumbent Republican Chris Carr leads with 44.5% of the vote to state Democratic Sen. Jen Jordans 34.6% and Libertarian Martin Cowens 6.6%.

Theyre getting a share of the Republican vote, but theyre also getting shares of the Democratic vote and doing especially well among independents, Bullock said. Well, that kind of makes sense. An independent says I dont like Democrats or Republicans anyway, and wow, heres an option.

But those numbers are likely to shrink as Election Day nears, Bullock said.

Part of whats happening is that voters who have not made a commitment can put off making commitments with either major party, yeah, right now Im with the libertarian, but what we see happening is if push comes to shove, its Election Day, and voting for a libertarian means youre not going to vote for somebody whos going to be ultimately a winner. So then, people who have picked out a libertarian or independent earlier on in the process, most of them gravitate towards one of the two major parties.

Libertarian candidates and voters are familiar with the polls, but theyre not throwing in the towel.

For Metz, part of the objective is fighting against the duopoly the two parties currently enjoy.

George Washington, in his farewell address, actually warned us that political parties will be the ruin of our republic, and thats exactly what has happened, he said.

Win or lose, the ultimate goal is to get their ideas into the mainstream, Metz said.

Our main objective is to change the dialogue, or at least to steer the dialogue to the issues that are important, impactful and are authorized functions of the government in both the state and the federal constitution, he said.

Third-party candidates can play a role in shaping the political narrative, Bullock said, giving the example of the 1992 presidential election.

With Ross Perot, his issue was we need to balance the budget, we need to balance the budget, and in time, that then became a significant message also from Democrats and Republicans.

But the message the candidates are hoping to convey also matters, he added.

It can affect the discussion, if the third-party candidate gets enough votes to get their attention. It doesnt always work that way. An example would be back in 1948, Strom Thurmond runs on a segregationist ticket. That didnt then force Republicans and Democrats to become segregationists.

This story comes to GPB through a reporting partnership with Georgia Recorder.

Read more here:
Libertarians hope to make difference in tight election year - GPB News

Whisper it, but it was the folly of Brexit that paved the way for Trusss crazy libertarian zeal – The Guardian

Some plan for growth. Millions face futures they neither deserved nor were prepared for, so suddenly has disaster hit. Mortgage payers will be unexpectedly hammered. All homeowners face a sharp fall in house prices in which most of their wealth is held. Worse, those dependent on functioning public services and benefits confront privation and even destitution.

Compelled to find up to 40bn of spending cuts in November to pay for Liz Trusss unwanted tax cuts, the Treasury has to cripple the state to restore financial credibility. Capital investment, the science budget, new schools and hospitals, uprating benefits and public sector wages in line with inflation forget them all. Instead of a stimulus to growth, Britain faces intense economic and social dislocation and ongoing stagflation. Austerity is back, this time on an epic scale.

Whisper it this is where Brexit has inexorably led. There is no Brexit that can work congruent with deeply held British values, beliefs and economic interests. A democratic vote has transmuted into a rightwing coup, culminating in a destructive libertarian programme, an attempt to shrink a state the right considers bloated, to eliminate the last remnants of regulation, to try to drive taxes down, however vital to sustain public services. All in the name of liberating enterprise and forcing self-reliance on what the Brexit right consider a lazy, cushioned workforce. The line from Brexit to last weeks debacle is straight and obvious.

The EU never ranked in the top 10 of voter concerns: it was an obsession of the British right who saw it as emblematic of big state regulation; worse, it was from abroad. Yes, the EU, in trying to create common product, service and professional standards across member states, along with allied freedoms to secure the benefits of a continental economic area, perforce has to regulate. But to American libertarians, so influential on the British right, any regulation is necessarily coercive, limits freedom and is morally damnable. These libertarians live in a parallel universe in which the only moral responsibility is to oneself: even the pronoun we is coercive because it subsumes the individual I. If you think that, then any EU directive for any purpose must necessarily be opposed to the last.

Worse, the EU became a source of law that did not originate in the House of Commons, which exists in rightwing circles to confer prerogative power to the English upper class via the Tory party. The EU may be creating a continental market, high-quality standards and continent-wide competition, but it threatened an idiosyncratic conception of liberty, and a self-interested idea of sovereignty.

This was a minority preoccupation until immigration jumped in salience. Suddenly, the prospect emerged of an alliance between English libertarian toffs and an elderly, white working class. Add the malevolent genius of Nigel Farage, together with plausible Brexiters on the left, like the charismatic RMT boss Mick Lynch, and the rest is history.

EU membership was an unacknowledged boon: it had opened up 40 years of economic growth that allowed Britain to become a much more liberal society while avoiding the tough issues in addressing the deep dysfunctions of its capitalism. The better part of the City boomed, offered a continental hinterland, while multinational investors turned round swathes of the British economy from the car to the food industry able to export freely from low-cost Britain into the EU single market. Companies such as Vodafone could become multinationals, turning British standards into global standards via the EUs blessing. Our regions were propped up by generous EU funding. Longstanding weaknesses, from endemic financial short-termism to a chronically weak training system, were disguised. Where weakly regulated Britain did not act, from securing clean beaches to promoting security at work, the EU stepped in to hide British failings.

Brexit has wrecked all of that. Desperate attempts to revive the London stock market as an international financial magnet fail to recognise that, cut off from the EU, it is just a failing regional stock market: inward investment has stagnated; exports of goods and services are falling; no new companies can ever reproduce Vodafones path to scale. Britain has to invent another economic model reflecting its new, isolated place in the world.

Boris Johnson could talk about levelling up, becoming a science superpower and restoring the Citys greatness, but without EU membership it was all hot air. Britain once led EU science and finance. No more. It once had the tax base to fund levelling up and attract inward investment. No more. For Truss, Kwarteng and the rest of the doomsday cult there is only one way forward a libertarian revolution. Hence last weeks disaster.

It will fail, and not only because of social and political revulsion. The whole thesis is wrong. Capitalism cannot pauperise the societies in which it operates: it must earn a licence to operate. Public agency is an imperative to share otherwise crippling risk with business. There must be maximum access to continental scale markets: the obvious one is Europe. A libertarian US government, with the dollar as the worlds reserve currency, could borrow on a Trussian scale. Isolated Britain cannot.

The alternative is the model the Labour party is starting to fashion: a partnership between government and business, pursuing an industrial strategy designed to meet national challenges climate change, data, care, resilience and all the while attentive to building a stronger, fairer society. Success will demand redressing financial short-termism and a weak skills base, and promoting purpose-driven companies. But, crucially, EU markets must be opened up to our business, high tech, universities and finance. The UK must join the customs union; and it must align with EU rules and regulations in sector after sector. Only thus is there any prospect of the export growth and accompanying investment growth to lift our living standards.

The shadow cabinet may not want to talk about it, but this is the inexorable logic of its position. Yet reality does crowd in on politicians: Truss will attend the first meeting of the European Political Community in Prague this week, championed by President Macron, to discuss European defence and energy security; there is a collective European interest of which Britain is part. Last week witnessed peak libertarianism and peak Euroscepticism.

The long, slow march back to where Britain belongs now begins into the heart of Europe.

Will Hutton is an Observer columnist

Follow this link:
Whisper it, but it was the folly of Brexit that paved the way for Trusss crazy libertarian zeal - The Guardian

Shane Hazel hopes to give voters another option in Georgia governor’s race – FOX 5 Atlanta

Getting to know Sane Hazel, Libertarian candidate for governor

Early voting is just 10 days away, and Georgians may be surprised to see a third name on the ballot in the race for governor. Libertarian Shane Hazel is running against incumbent Republican Brian Kemp and Democrat Stacey Abrams.

ATLANTA - With just about a month to go until Election Day, most voters have heard a lot about the rematch between incumbent Gov. Brian Kemp and Democratic challenger Stacey Abrams. But Georgians will see a third name on their ballots this fall--Libertarian Shane Hazel.

"I think Georgia needs another choice. We've got a Republican and a Democrat and what we've seen over the years is more and more government invasion into our lives," said Hazel.

Hazel first ran for office as a Republican in 2018 when he tried to unseat incumbent U.S. Rep. Robb Woodall in the 7th Congressional District. Woodall won the primary with about 72% of the votes.

His first campaign as a Libertarian was in 2020 when he ran for Senate against Republican David Perdue and Democrat Jon Ossoff. While Perdue garnered the most votes, Hazel won 115,039 votes (2.32%) in that race, forcing the contest to a January runoff, which Ossoff won.

In Georgia, a candidate must get 50% plus one vote in order to win a race without a runoff.

Hazel could be a factor again this fall. The most recent InsiderAdvantage/FOX 5 poll put Kemp at 50%, Abrams at 45% and Hazel at 2%, with 3% of voters undecided.

Kemp won the 2018 race with 50.22% of the November vote--8,744 votes over the 50% threshold.Libertarian Ted Metz received 37,235 (0.95%) votes, only about a third of what Hazel got in the 2020 Senate race.

Hazel's platform centers around personal liberty. The Cherokee County podcaster wants to eliminate income and property taxes, nullify federal and state education mandates and get rid of health care mandates like vaccinations.

FIREARMS

Hazel strongly supports the Second Amendment and called the state's new permit-less carry law "a step in the right direction."

"The Second Amendment was just a codification of your right to protect your life, liberty and property," Hazel explained. "Take it a step further, as governor, as a Libertarian, say let's get rid of the ATF. Let's nullify the ATF. Let's move them out of Georgia and allow people to provide for their own self-defense the way they think they should."

MARIJUANA

"It's a plant. By nature, it's your right," said Hazel, who advocates for legalizing cannabis.

Thursday President Joe Biden announced he will pardon all federal marijuana possession offenses and called on governors to do the same at the state level.

"Sometimes the Democrats get it right. Sometimes the Republicans get it right, but when we err on the side of freedom for peaceful people, you're never going to get it wrong," Hazel said.

ABORTION

Hazel, a father of three, said he is pro-life, but expressed concerns about the state government's role in either sanctioning or banning abortion.

Currently, Georgia's "heartbeat" abortion law outlaws the procedure in most cases once a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is at around six weeks of pregnancy.

"The best idea that we have as Libertarians I think is to decentralize this down to the city and the county level where those populations maybe of different cultures and different backgrounds decide differently for their areas and we respect those people's cultures and their decisions on what they want to do. Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't know in terms of taking money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice that we can do such a thing in an effective manner and live in a peaceful society."

Hazel will debate Abrams and Gov. Kemp on October 17. Election Day is Nov. 8.

More here:
Shane Hazel hopes to give voters another option in Georgia governor's race - FOX 5 Atlanta

State third party election law declared unconstitutional, appeal being mulled – talkbusiness.net

A district judge has ruled that Arkansas 56 Libertarian Party candidates qualified for this years ballot, but the state could still appeal for future elections, and if it does, the incoming Senate president pro tempore expects it to win.

In an 83-page decision, U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker ruled Sept. 30 that an Arkansas law passed in 2019 violated the Libertarian Party of Arkansas 1st and 14th Amendment rights. The case was Libertarian Party of Arkansas v. John Thurston, who is secretary of state.

Act 164 of 2019 increased the required number of valid signatures new parties must collect from 10,000 to 3% of the total number of votes in the previous governors race. For this election cycle, the Libertarians would have had to submit 26,746 valid signatures, which is more than they did.

A new party is any party that did not win 3% of the vote in the preceding governors race or presidents race, whichever is most recent. The Libertarian candidate for president in 2020, Jo Jorgensen, received 1% of the vote in 2020. The law also limited third parties signature-collecting process to 90 days and moved the dates for submitting signatures and certifying candidates to earlier in the year before the election.

Baker wrote that the laws provisions collectively impose a severe burden on plaintiffs rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and that the State of Arkansas is unable to demonstrate that the statutes are narrowly drawn to serve a compelling state interest.

Thurston spokesman Chris Powell said his office was still conferring with the attorney generals office about whether to appeal. Gov. Asa Hutchinson told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that he was reviewing the case and would assess whether to appeal.

Dr. Michael Pakko, the Libertarian Party of Arkansas chairman, said in an interview that the Legislature needs to address the gap that now exists in Arkansas election law. Asked if the Legislature would alter the law when it next meets in 2023, Sen. Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, the incoming Senate president pro tempore, wrote in a text, Judge Baker will get overruled as is a matter of routine practice for her rulings.

Baker had issued a preliminary injunction in the case in 2019, a decision that later was affirmed by the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Pakko said the combination of new requirements included in the law made it especially burdensome for Libertarians to collect the required number of signatures. The 10,000-signature requirement was put into law in 2007. After that, Libertarians qualified for elections starting in 2012. The Green Party qualified for the ballot from 2008 to 2014.

Under Act 164, new parties are required to be recognized 60 days before the filing period. For this election cycle, that was Dec. 24, 2021, which is 319 days before the general election and five months before Republicans and Democrats held their primary elections. In the next election cycle, the signature deadline would be even earlier Sept. 7, 2023. The Libertarians argued that the early deadlines came long before elections when voters are less interested.

Libertarians favor greatly reducing the scope and role of government. They would drastically reduce government spending on social programs, and they also support gun rights, gay rights, and legalizing marijuana.

Pakko said theres a perception that Libertarians take more votes from Republicans than Democrats. He said he hasnt seen evidence that is the case. He said he believes the party gets votes from people who otherwise would not vote, and then the rest come from people who would have voted for both Republicans and Democrats.

The party has yet to elect a candidate to a significant office in Arkansas, but he said its presence raises issues that might otherwise be ignored. He hopes the party can be more competitive as its credibility and name identification grows.

I think our democracy would be a lot more healthy if we had more than two competing parties bashing heads all the time, he said.

Pakko testified in court that the party has spent $30,000 to collect signatures, in addition to the volunteer effort.

The party could avoid the signature requirement if its candidate for governor, Ricky Dale Harrington, wins 3% of the vote in November. Harrington received 33.5% of the vote as Sen. Tom Cottons only opponent in the 2020 U.S. Senate race. The partys best finish in a governors race came in 2018 when Mark West won 2.9%, falling 861 votes short of the 3% mark.

Among the arguments made by the state was that the law would keep the ballot from becoming too cluttered. But Pakko said there is no evidence that the ballot is cluttered now. Many legislative races are uncontested or feature only a Libertarian running against a major party candidate.

The party has candidates for governor, U.S. Senate, three congressional races, lieutenant governor and state auditor. It also has nine candidates for state Senate and 31 for the state House.

Pakko said the laws provisions were really intended to keep other parties off the ballot and to limit competition in the electoral process. In 2019, the law passed the Senate before he had the chance to testify. Pakko noted that because this is a civil rights case, the Libertarian Partys legal fees would be paid by the state, in addition to the costs the state has incurred in its own defense.

See the original post:
State third party election law declared unconstitutional, appeal being mulled - talkbusiness.net