Archive for the ‘Libya’ Category

To Libya and Back: Inside a Stealth Bomber Strike Against ISIS – Popular Mechanics

The mission is easy to describe, but hard to execute. Two B-2 Spirit bombers, each with two people in the cockpit, will take off, fly to the target, drop enough bombs to eradicate the ISIS camps, and immediately fly back home to Missouri. Things get more complex as planners weigh in on everything from the pilot's diets to the size of the bombs loaded in the airplane.

"It takes a symphony of people," says Major General Scott Vander Hamm, assistant deputy chief of staff of operations at the Air Force headquarters and a former B-2 pilot.

Two B-2 Spirit bombers await orders for takeoff.

U.S. Air Force / Senior Airman Joel Pfiester

While working out the finer diplomatic details, the military continues planning. "There are times when the President says, 'This is what we want. This is the objective, tell us how you could do it,'" Vander Hamm says during an interview with PM days after the strike. "That was the case for last week's flights."

Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, AFRICOM commander, chooses the B-2an odd choice. The stealth bombers are built for a Cold War mission: to evade radar and drop bombs (even atomic) and get out undetected. No one in Libya has sophisticated anti-aircraft to threaten U.S. aircraft, so the stealth is not necessary.

But a bomber is an absolutely essential part of the equation. Nothing else can drop thousands of pounds of explosives on targets at the same time quite like a bomber. The U.S. bomber fleet includes non-stealth B-1s and B-52s, but it's the B-2s that can loiter for long stretches. Just because the B-2 can stay over a target doesn't mean the pilots want to. "We are versatile," Scorch says. "But it's always in the back of all of our minds to get in and get out."

The targets define what aircraft flies the mission, and 500-pound bombs are all that is needed to take out a collection of mud-walled buildings and unarmored vehicles.

80 GBU-38 guided ammunitions inside one bay door of a B-2 before Libya mission.

U.S. Air Force / Senior Airman Joel Pfiester

The weapon loaders can mix and match smaller and heavier bombs, but Vander Hamm says the Libya mission B-2s carry a "homogenous loadout" of 500-pound bombs. The B-2 can carry 80 of these 500-pound bombs, each guided to detonation with GPS coordinates. Each of the bombs can be programmed to hit a specific target, at a specific altitude, from a specific angle, at a specific time. "These were pretty tight shot groups, and the B-2s could attack them on a single pass," Vander Hamm says.

Although the targets are pre-programmed, B-2 pilots also program coordinates from the cockpit. Nearly every training sortie includes some on-the-fly retasking of weapons. Vander Hamm, who served as a B-2 pilot, says he once received a last-second orders to spare a target in Iraq that was providing the coalition with signals intelligence.

Each of the bombs can be programmed to hit a specific target, at a specific altitude, from a specific angle, at a specific time

Originally posted here:
To Libya and Back: Inside a Stealth Bomber Strike Against ISIS - Popular Mechanics

EU pins hopes on immigrant deal with Libya – WHQR

Alongside its debt crisis, the European Union has been grappling with another major problem: unwanted immigration. Last year, more than a million men, women and children refugees and irregular, economic immigrants poured into the bloc, putting a big strain on public services and leading to the re-imposition of border controls between some of the member states. A deal between the EU and Turkey eventually reduced to a trickle the flow of incomers from the east, but the influx from North Africa is increasing, and with tragic consequences. Of the tens of thousands of immigrants who reached Europe from the south after paying smugglers to get them across the Mediterranean, 4,500 perished in the attempt.

In a bid to stop this human traffic and save lives, the EU has now offered a second deal, this time with Libya.

The deal emerged from a recent summit of EU leaders in Malta and represents a new and controversial way of curbing immigration. British Prime Minister Theresa May, who took part in the summit, described the initiative as a comprehensive and coordinated approach to tackling one of the biggest challenges facing Europe.

The leaders agreed to pour millions of euros into beefing up the Libyan coast guard to stop people smugglers and to step up search and rescue operations. But far more controversially, the EU also offered to set up and fund refugee camps in southern Libya where people who are trying to reach Europe could be held and have their asylum claims processed. Human rights groups are aghast.

If Europe is admitting that it will struggle to meet the needs of refugees, how on earth can it expect a country, which barely has a functioning government, to do it?" asked Nick Dearden of the Global Justice campaign group.

This is not about saving migrant lives. This is simply about giving some money probably a lot of it will be taken from the aid budget to keep people where they are and push that burden onto other countries, he said.

The United Nations Human Rights Rapporteur has also entered the fray over the EUs new deal. Professor Francois Crepeau accused the European Council of pandering to anti-immigrant feeling for political reasons in order to stave off any populist backlash in the upcoming general elections in the Netherlands, France and Germany this year.

No one at the European Council headquarters in Brussels was prepared to comment.

Read more:
EU pins hopes on immigrant deal with Libya - WHQR

The Libyan National Guard announced in Tripoli – The Libya Observer

Brig. Mahmoud Al-Zigal has officially announced the establishment of the Libyan National Guard (LNG) on Thursday.

In a press conference in Tripoli, Chief of LNG, Brig. Mahmoud Al-Zigal said the LNG is not linked to any political party and would operate away from regional, tribal and political disputes.

He said the LNG would continue fighting the remnants of ISIS group until it eradicates them from all Libyan cities and towns.

Most of the armed brigades under the Libyan National Guard took part in Sirte battle against ISIS.

The LNG will stand against all criminal and terrorist acts and it will provide support to all state institutions and protect them from coup attempts and terrorist acts, Al-Zigal pointed out.

He indicated that the LNG would also protect Libyas sea and land borders and strategic and vital installations.

We will provide all support to build a Libyan army based on technical standards, an army that is not involved in the political disputes, he remarked.

He added that the LNG would also fight the illegal immigration and spread of arms in the country, in addition to protection of foreign embassies and diplomatic missions.

He called on all Libyans to cooperate with LNG to bring peace and stability to the country again.

The Libyan National Guard was formed by the General National Congress in 2015. Military sources close to LNG confirmed that the new established force would not operate under the Salvation Government.

Link:
The Libyan National Guard announced in Tripoli - The Libya Observer

12 Hours Of Daily Power Outage In Libya, Is It Politically Driven? – The Libya Observer

Except for March, April, May, October and November when temperatures are pleasantly mild Libya has failed for the past three years to bring electricity demand and supply into balance. Daily power cuts can last from seven to twelve hours in Tripoli, the capital, and up to 30 hours in the outskirts.

As we report this, Tripoli experiences twelve hours of daily power cuts (Load shedding) under a wave of cold temperatures. This failure as perceived by the general public on the part of the states owned-electricity company (GECOL) is actually coupled with an even worse dysfunctional communication strategy that has long triggered and promoted a deep misconception consisting of a consensus among the general public that GECOL manipulates the production and distribution of electricity in what is widely conceived as politically driven to focus public attention away from the dysfunctional authority in Tripoli and the parties behind it as to maintain a state of illusion and suffer to the ultimate goal of preventing people from taking political stand.

The growing misconception is the result of GECOLs failure to clearly lay out as to why supply and demand are not in balance throughout most of the year, which has further undermined publics faith in GECOL and state institutions as a whole. It would be a greater mistake to assume that the Libyan people would indefinitely put up with an overwhelming load shedding that undermine their luxury lives.

Within the first thirty minutes of load shedding and with a usual high traffic of phone calls the wireless coverage of the states owned telecommunication company ALMADAR stops in some neighborhoods of Tripoli for lack of backup power, as well as water supply provided by the states company.

The extended hours of outages in Tripoli and most of the country in every single day of July, August, September, December and January, particularly when other cities enjoy full coverage or only two to three hours of load shedding effectively promote the notion that electricity crisis is set in motion for political reasons.

The underlying cause for the inability to meet demand and thus the employment of daily load shedding across neighborhoods and cities as a last resort to avoid power grid collapse is nothing but the enormous and unimaginable wasteful consumption by householders, businesses and public institutions.

At present, Libya produces 5,000 MWh out of 5,200 MWh in full capacity, failing to meet the demand of a population of less than five millions (1.2 million customers in 2010) with nearly no industrial sector, when the next door neighbor, Tunisia, with over 11 million in population (3.6 million customers in 2016), an established industrial and tourism sectors and much larger economic activities consumes only 3,000 MWh in winter. The difference between the Libyan and the Tunisian consumers lays in the fact that the latter cannot escape paying electric bills. This is what GECOLs staff would disclose behind closed doors.

Libyans enjoy luxury lives inside their homes. In January the peak load reached 7,200 MWh and refusal of some neighborhoods to share load shedding caused total blackouts in most cities in the western and southern regions. When one million and three hundred thousand out of less than five millions in current population are employed in public sector and only few report to work (from 8 am to 2 pm) it should come as no surprise that peak time in summer is 12 pm which is a normal working hour as opposed to 4 pm in neighboring countries. The security condition and the almost non-existing private sector along with the attitude in the public sector leave Libyans with no choice but to stay home.

In reality, the Libyan power grid has a technical deficiency consisting of transmission losses that stem from misalignment of transmission system with respect to the locations of generation plants, as well as limitations on how to move power around its grid. The west region usually has a generation of 2,000 MWh and a demand of 1,000 MWh so the rest needs to be moved to other regions.

However, under the countrys condition the power crisis is identified as the result of an exponential increase in household appliances, particularly heaters and air conditioners which are not energy-efficient, and actually draw excessive power from and destabilize the Libyan power grid. It is not unusual to see houses and villas with hundreds of light bulbs. Homes, businesses and institutions comprise several individual air conditioning and heating units (as opposed to central heating and cooling with much less consumption) and all being utilized and left on. In some neighborhoods of Tripoli there are hundreds of small shops of electronics (even with a surface of 3 by 3) all of which are equipped with air conditioners and heaters and being utilized without stop in summer and winter and pay no electric bills.

Only foreign companies and diplomatic missions pay electric bills, all of which departed after June 2014. According to the World Bank, the per capita electric power consumption was 3,923 kWh in Libya in 2013, as opposed to 1,277 in Algeria, 1,697 in Egypt , 866 in Morocco and 1,435 in Tunisia. Behind closed doors GECOL discusses the loss and an unaccounted for quantity of 500 MWh by illegal connections to the power grid. That is exactly the current production capacity of Al Khoms power station.

Historically, Libyan householders excessively consume electricity. In 1990 and while under UN economic sanctions and a paralyzed economy the per capita consumption was 1,493 KWh, the equivalent to the current neighboring countries consumptions.

According to the World Bank, the residential sector accounts for the largest share of electricity consumption representing 35%, followed by street lighting (15%), public building (18%), commercial building (12%) and industry (8%).

From technical perspective, consumers are responsible for GECOLs inability to meet the ever increasingly demand, however, GECOL has yet to come up with and effective message to the general public to put the issue of load shedding technically in the right perspective.

The widespread technical misconception driving public opinion on load shedding consists of (1) electricity can be produced, stored in power grid and distributed (2) electricity can be produced as needed and irrespective of production capacity and demand.

Consumers lack the understanding that electricity as a moving energy in the grid can only be produced to the level of demand under optimum conditions to bring supply and demand into balance. Considering that production capacity exceeds demand, GECOL would only deploy the appropriate production facilities to maintain balance. That is the reason why production varies throughout the day to keep up with a varying demand and peaks. Perhaps little basic technical explanation can solve issues of national concern.

Unfortunately consumers miss the point that air conditioners and heaters can take down the countrys power grid. A power grid requires that generation and load closely balance moment by moment, frequent adjustments to the output of generators are necessary. The balance can be judged by measuring the system frequency; if it is increasing, more power is being generated than used, which causes all the machines in the system to accelerate. If the system frequency is decreasing, more load is on the system than the instantaneous generation can provide, which causes all generators to slow down and introduces the possibility of load shedding.

When 500 MWh are stolen from the grid and consumers dont pay electric assuming electricity is provided by the government at no cost then extended load shedding and collapse of power grid should in fact come as no surprise. In fact, Libyans as wasteful as they are, even before the 2011, were accustomed to paying no bills, including electricity, however, with the total absence and collapse of the state the wasteful consumption has gone up to unsustainable levels that the power grid cannot maintain and this is what GECOL has failed to effectively convey to its consumers. Since payment of electric bill is not enforced Libyans leaves homes, offices and businesses with air conditioners and heaters on day and night.

The National Control Center (NCC) being located in Tripoli and coordinating power generation and distribution at central level has no automatic control and actually communicates by phone with generation stations and substations which are operated by locals across the country. These local technicians and engineers would never stop power generation and in fact they ignore instructions by the NCC for periodic and share of load shedding among neighborhoods and this exactly explains the power grid collapse in several cities of the western regions in last few days. Local militias and armed gangs are stationed at the front gate of every electricity facility in the country and technical staff enters with permission let alone to endanger their lives by manipulating generation and distribution of electricity.

Under the Libyan context, 5000 MW is an extraordinary effort and achievement by GECOL and should be sufficient for the Libyan population and the type of economic activities. The effort made by GECOLs staff who put their lives in line to minimize suffer on the Libyan people is not much appreciated. While GECOL has plenty of causes to substantiate inability to meet an unlimited demand its press releases, however, can be categorized as being pathetic in language and content. Has GECOL launched an effective and aggressive communication campaign aimed at spreading awareness and advocating reducing demand, the supply shortage, if any, would have been much lesser.

The cheap price of diesel, 0.15 Libyan dinar for one liter ($0.1), makes substantial number of Libyan householders and businesses equipped with diesel generators as a support in time of outages. While consumers appear to not understand and care less about the principal of balanced supply and demand when consuming electricity from the grid, their saving in electricity to avoid tripping of their own generators in time of outages is particularly noteworthy.

The communication strategy to continue to cast blame anywhere but on its failed communication has proven to be totally ineffective in light of the extended time of load shedding that disrupt life in winter and summer. The press releases by GECOL highlight a complete incompetency and are completely useless for those seeking to understand the actual reasons, and rise the more fundamental question as to whether GECOL realizes that an effective communication strategy and a language as a key for making perceptions, particularly in time of crises, are fundamental to good governance.

Load shedding is GECOLs last resort to prevent a nationwide collapse of power system, which if occurred would particularly take long time to restore under the security challenges. Prior to the last resort utility companies request the volunteer reduction in demand from its consumers by saving in electricity, yet Libyan consumers dont respond.

The bottom line is that electric bills are not being paid by consumers and there is no authority to enforce payment and that is the underlying cause for unlimited demand that destabilizes the power system country-wide. Would consumers have been hit with large electric bills reflecting consumptions and would payments have been enforced, consumers would have surely been mindful of their consumptions. As vital as electricity is to daily life and given consumers attitude toward demand which would unlikely to change in any near future makes GECOL is definitely in desperate need of a responsible press office that puts in place a strategic communication plan. It is also unlikely that GECOL has the staff with the proper expertise in communication to meet the communication challenges, however, GECOL can hire foreign firms specialized in communication and public relation.

Practically, there are not policies or incentives that would lead to behavior change, and unless Libyan consumers can substantially reduce national demand, load shedding will become necessary to protect the electrical power system from collapsing. TV channels and radio stations exist across the country, some of which have high viewers and audiences and are very efficient in promoting polarization and division among the Libyan people on different grounds. Instead, they obviously can make themselves useful and contribute with a positive influence on changing consumers behavior.

While GECOL dismisses allegations for manipulation of production and distribution it has never officially refuted them. Misunderstanding stemmed from lack of basic information and discussion. GECOL must deliver clear, repeated and open communication to earn public understanding and acceptance, and never has this been more possible with explosion of mobile and digital tools that directly engage the public.

GECOL is failing to catch the simplicity of the general public toward the notion that it is a highly politicized states company that inflict suffer on them, and yet achieves nothing to refute that misconception. In what increasingly appears to be an irreversible path of division and chaos that the country has taken, unfortunately, there is no sign from GECOL and the government of Libya to effectively address the electricity crisis, as well as no waking up from consumers to the fact that an unlimited and yet irresponsible consumption destabilizes and collapses the power grid.

Under optimum conditions GECOL can produce a maximum of 5,200 MWh. How would the load peak of 7,200 MWh inJanuary 2017 be met?

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Libya Observer

See the article here:
12 Hours Of Daily Power Outage In Libya, Is It Politically Driven? - The Libya Observer

Libya could jump-start Trump-Putin cooperation – Charleston Post Courier

BY LEONID BERSHIDSKY

Those waiting for the first signs of cooperation between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin should keep an eye on Libya. The scene of an open rivalry between the European Union and Russia could suddenly turn on Trump, who could turn to Putin.

Libya is important for three reasons. Its the starting point of the so-called Central Mediterranean route by which tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants reach Europe. Its also a major oil producer that can affect global prices. Lastly, the chaos in Libya makes it, in U.S. terminology, a terrorist safe haven. Thats why presidents Obama and Trump have tried to limit the entry of Libyan citizens and those who have visited the country.

At an informal summit on Malta on Friday European states affirmed their support for the U.N.-backed government, run from Tripoli by Prime Minister Fayez Mustafa al-Serraj. They also backed a deal Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni signed on with Serraj. Italy is taking the lead in funding the construction of refugee camps in Libya, and the E.U. as a whole recently earmarked an additional 200 million euros for its efforts to keep potential migrants in Libya, Tunisia and Niger. But refugees are not Putins priority in Libya. Hes more interested in restoring Russian influence there, and establishing a military presence if he can.

Under Moamar Gaddafi, Libya was a Russian ally, a playground for Russian energy companies, and a buyer of Russian weapons. When he fell in 2011, the Russian state railroad monopoly lost a contract to build a line along the Mediterranean.

Putin watched the Arab Spring with dismay not just because it dispatched kleptocrats like himself, but also because those secular authoritarian rulers were often replaced with Islamists. To Putin, these strongmen were a bulwark against jihadism. He drew a line at the attempt to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, forged a relationship with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and restored ties with Turkeys Recep Tayyip Erdogan. His alliance with Iran fits that line of behavior because Shia Iranians are hostile to Sunni extremists that Putin considers especially dangerous since they emerged as a force in separatist Chechnya in the 1990s.

In Libya, Putins axis of secular authoritarians cannot include Serraj since he holds onto power with support from some Islamist groups and Putins Western adversaries. Khalifa Haftar, a powerful military commander who controls eastern Libya and resists the Serraj government, fits the bill much better.

Haftar chased Islamist fighters out of Benghazi and took over Libyas key oil terminals from pro-government forces last September, boosting the countrys output. The Kremlin has been cultivating a relationship with Haftar, inviting him for a visit to Moscow last November, then hosting him on the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov in January, where he held a teleconference with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. Russia is obliged to follow the U.N. arms embargo against any Libyan forces except the al-Serraj government, so it cannot provide official military aid to Haftar. There have been unconfirmed reports, however, that the Kremlin has struck a deal to supply Haftar via Algeria, a long-time Moscow arms client.

Thats potentially scary for the E.U. If a Putin ally takes over Libya, any deal on their primary issue refugees could be threatened. If Haftar allowed Russian military bases in Libya, Putins strength in Middle East politics would to grow as well.

This sets the scene for a potential clash between the E.U. on one side and Putin and Trump on the other. There are major reasons for Trump to support Haftar over Serraj. Haftar spent 20 years in the U.S., not far from the Central Intelligence Agencys Langley headquarters, working to undermine Gaddafi, his one-time friend and ally. Trump is also highly skeptical of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clintons actions in Libya as the Qaddafi regime disintegrated, and, like Putin, he doesnt believe in imposing democracy on Middle Eastern nations where Islamist groups enjoy popular support.

Moscow likely wouldnt mind testing the opportunities for cooperation with Trump in Libya. On Thursday, the state propaganda agency RIA Novosti published a column by Avigdor Eskin, an Israeli political consultant close to the Russian nationalist right, asserting that the Trump administration had a Libyan plan that might involve Russian cooperation via Haftar. The supposed plan involves building micro-cities rather than refugee camps in Libya, with factories and oil facilities to put them to work.

Though that sounds like wishful thinking, the Kremlin is likely to approach Trump with offers of pacifying Libya and thus weakening the Islamic State. The U.S. wouldnt need to do anything except turn a blind eye to Russian support of Haftar. As in Syria, Putins unique selling proposition is that he is not squeamish when it comes to dealing with strongmen and that, unlike any Western leader, he is unconstrained by the need to seek political support at home: He knows by now how to create it through a powerful propaganda machine. If Trumps isolationist team is willing to cut its risks and outsource part of its promised fight against terrorism to Russia, an understanding on Libya is a possible first step down that road.

Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg View columnist

Follow this link:
Libya could jump-start Trump-Putin cooperation - Charleston Post Courier