Archive for the ‘Machine Learning’ Category

Identification and validation of potential common biomarkers for papillary thyroid carcinoma and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis … – Nature.com

Identify shared differential genes

When conducting PCA analysis on the expression matrices of GSE33570 (Fig.2a) and GSE29315 (Fig.2d), we observed a clear two-sided distribution of samples in both the disease group and the control group. In the analysis of the GSE35570 dataset, a total of 1572 distinct genes were detected as being differentially expressed. These DEGs were categorized into 824 up-regulated genes and 748 down-regulated genes (Fig.2b). Similarly, we observed 423 DEGs in the GSE29315 dataset, including 271 up-regulated DEGs and 152 down-regulated DEGs (Fig.2e). Next, the GEGs of the two datasets are displayed heatmaps for both datasets (Fig.2c,f). Furthermore, we employed a Venn diagram to identify the overlapping genes with the same directional trend, resulting in 64 genes being up-regulated (Fig.2g) and 37 genes being down-regulated (Fig.2h).

Differential expression gene analysis, function enrichment analysis and pathway enrichment analysis. (a) The PCA plot of GSE35570. (b, c) The Volcano plot and heatmap of DEGs in GSE33570. (d) The PCA plot of GSE29315. (e, f) The Volcano plot and heatmap of DEGs in GSE29315. (g) Venn plot of the up-regulated DEGs. (h) Venn plot of the down-regulated DEGs. (i) The KEGG enrichment analyses of DEGs. (j) The GO enrichment analyses of DEGs.

In order to enhance our comprehension of the fundamental biological functions linked to the 101 DEGs, an assessment of GO and KEGG enrichment was conducted using the clusterProfiler software package in R. An analysis of GO highlighted that these shared genes were mainly enriched in leukocyte mediated immunity, myeloid leukocyte activation, and antigen processing and presentation (Fig.2j). Additionally, the DEGs exhibited significant enrichment across the top five KEGG pathways, including Tuberculosis, Phagosome, Viral myocarditis, Inflammatory bowel disease, and Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation (Fig.2i). Apparently, the functions of differentially expressed genes are closely associated with the immune function of the body. The core genes primarily serve the purpose of activating immune cells.

To carry out the PPI analysis, we utilized the STRING online tool and visualized the outcomes using the Cytoscape software (Supplementary Fig. S1a). The PPI network showed 68 nodes and 498 edges. The DC value of each node was calculated, with a median value of 11. Based on this, we identified 17 hub genes of PPI network: TYROBP, ITGB2, STAT1, HLA-DRA, C1QB, MMP9, FCER1G, IL10RA, LCP2, LY86, CD53, CD14, CD163, HCK, MNDA, HLA-DPA1, and ALOX5AP. Subsequently, we employed the MCODE plug-in to identify six modules (Supplementary Fig. S1b,c), which included a total of 29 common DEGs. These DEGs were LCP2, TYROBP, CD53, LY86, ITGB2, FCER1G, MNDA, C1QB, HCK, IL10RA, HLA-DRA, ALOX5AP, MT1G, MT1F, MT1E, MT1X, ISG15, IFIT3, PSMB9, GBP2, CD14, CD163, VSIG4, CAV1, TIMP1, S100A4, SDC2, FGFR2, and STAT1. The most important module comprises 12 genes (LCP2, TYROBP, CD53, LY86, ITGB2, FCER1G, MNDA, C1QB, HCK, IL10RA, HLA-DRA, ALOX5AP), which were further analyzed using the ClueGO plug-in in Cytoscape software. The investigation revealed that these genes primarily function in activating neutrophils to participate in the immune response and activating innate immunity (Supplementary Fig. S1d).

In this study, we analyzed a total of 26 genes from six modules extracted from MCODE. To determine the importance of each gene, we employed the RF algorithm in two datasets, namely GSE35570 (Fig.3a) and GSE29315 (Fig.3b). By comparing the rankings of gene importance in both datasets, we identified the top eight genes that were consistently ranked highly. To visualize this overlap, we created a Venn diagram (Fig.3c), which revealed three genes (CD53, FCER1G and TYROBP) that were shared between the two datasets. Remarkably, these three genes overlap with the hub genes identified through the PPI analysis based on DC values, as well as the genes found in the most significant module. These three genes showed promising diagnostic potential for HT and PTC. To evaluate the diagnostic value of the common hub genes, we computed the Cutoff Value, sensitivity, specificity, AUC and 95% CI for each gene in the four datasets (Table 1). In the GSE35570 dataset (Fig.3d), the AUC values were as follows: CD53 (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.610.82), FCER1G (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.730.89), and TYROBP (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.710.88). In the GSE29315 dataset (Fig.3e), the AUC values were as follows: CD53 (AUC 1.00, 95% CI 1.001.00), FCER1G (AUC 1.00, 95% CI 1.001.00) and TYROBP (AUC 1.00, 95% CI 1.001.00). In the TCGA dataset (Fig.3f), we validated the diagnostic value of the common hub genes for PTC. The AUC values were as follows: CD53 (AUC 0.71 95% CI 0.610.82), FCER1G (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.640.89) and TYROBP (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.700.89). To further evaluate the diagnostic value of the common hub genes for PTC in HT, we computed the AUC and 95% CI for each gene using GSE1398198. In the GSE138198 dataset (Fig.3g), the AUC values were as follows: CD53 (AUC 0.83, 95%CI 0.571.00), FCER1G (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.721.00) and TYROBP (AUC 1.00, 95% CI 1.001.00). We also analyzed the difference box plots between the two groups in the four datasets (Supplementary Fig. S2). Our analysis using box plots revealed a noteworthy disparity in gene expression between the HT group and the control group in GSE29315. This disparity serves as an explanation for the AUC values of the three hub genes in GSE29315, all of which were observed to be 1.

Screening of hub genes and the diagnostic value of hub genes. (a) The rankings of gene importance in GSE35570. (b) The rankings of gene importance in GSE29315. (c) Venn plot of the top eight genes in GSE35570 and GSE29315. (d) Diagnostic value of hub genes in the GSE35570. (e) Diagnostic value of hub genes in the GSE29315, (f) Diagnostic value of hub genes in the TCGA. (g) Diagnostic value of hub genes in the GSE138198.

By using the GSE35570 dataset, we developed three diagnostic model specifically for PTC, incorporating these pivotal genes that were identified through our analysis. The ANN model (Fig.4a) had 4 hidden units, a penalty of 0.0108, and was trained for 537 epochs. The ANN model achieved an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.910.98) in the training set, while in the test set, the AUC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.831.00) (Fig.4b). The XGBoost model had 8 mtry, 6 min_n, 3 max_depth, 0.001 learn_rate, and 0.07 loss_reduction and 0.97 sample_size. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.750.93) in the training set, while in the test set, the AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.420.83) (Supplementary Fig. S3a). The DT model had 0.0003 cost_complexity, 5 tree_depth and 6 min_n. The DT model achieved an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.900.97) in the training set, while in the test set, the AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.651.00) (Supplementary Fig. S3b). Supplementary Table S1 displays the predictive performance of three machine learning models. The results indicate that the ANN model outperformed the other models, leading us to choose the ANN model for further analysis. TCGA dataset as external validation dataset was utilized to assess the diagnostic performance of the ANN model for PTC, yielding an AUC value of 0.77 (95% CI 0.660.87) (Fig.4c). The GSE138198 dataset was used to evaluate the ANN models diagnostic efficacy for PTC in HT. In the GSE138198 dataset (Fig.4d), the ANN model demonstrated a perfect AUC of 1.00 (95% CI 1.001.00). To provide clinicians with a better understanding of variable contributions, we utilized the SHAP algorithm to interpret the ANN prediction results. Figure4e, f, g illustrated how the attributed importance of features changed as their values varied. Our findings reveal that CD53 had the most significant impact on the output of the ANN model. Initially, it was positively associated with the risk of PTC and then became negatively correlated after a turning point of approximately 6. TYROBP and FCER1G showed a positive correlation with the occurrence of PTC.

ANN model construction and feature importance analysis. (a) The ANN was constructed based on the shared hub genes. (b) Diagnostic value of the ANN model in the GSE35570. (c) Diagnostic value of the ANN model in the TCGA. (d) Diagnostic value of the ANN model in the GSE138198. (e) A score calculated by SHAP was used for each input feature. (f, g) Distribution of the impact of each feature on the full model output estimated using the SHAP values.

We analyzed the protein expression of the hub genes based on the HPA database (Supplementary Fig. S4). CD53 was highly expressed in both tumor and normal tissues, while FCER1G and TYROBP showed higher expression in tumors compared to normal tissues. Furthermore, IF staining was performed to measure the expressions of CD53, FCER1G, and TYROBP in our clinical samples, including 10 HT-related PTC tissues and 6 NAT. By performing IF analysis (Fig.5), we obtained semi-quantitative results indicating significantly elevated fluorescence signal intensities for CD53, FCER1G, and TYROBP in the HT-related PTC group, as compared to the NAT group (P<0.05).

Microscopy scan of IF staining showed the distribution of CD53(green), FCER1G(green), and TYROBP(green), in HT-related PTC tissues and normal tissues adjacent to the tumour (NAT); as well as diagnostic value of CD53, FCER1G and TYROBP. MFI: Mean Fluorescence Intensity.

Considering the important roles of immune and inflammatory responses in the development of HT and PTC, we analyzed the differences in immune cell infiltration patterns between PTC, HT and normal samples using the CIBERSORT algorithm. By utilizing the GSE35570 dataset, we identified 12 immune subgroups that exhibited significant variations between PTC and normal samples (Supplementary Fig. S5a). Additionally, the analysis of the GSE29315 dataset revealed 5 immune subgroups that were significantly different between HT and normal samples (Supplementary Fig. S5b). Among these, 4 common immune subpopulations were found to be significantly higher in both PTC and HT samples compared to normal samples. These subpopulations included T cells CD8, T cells CD4 memory resting, macrophages M1 and mast cells resting. Additionally, we conducted spearman correlation analysis between hub genes and immune cells (Supplementary Fig. S5c,d). The results suggested that immune responses could potentially contribute to the involvement of hub genes in PTC and HT progression. IF staining was utilized to identify immune cell infiltration in 5 cases of PTC in HT tissues and 5 cases of NAT (Fig.6). The expression levels of CD4+T-cell marker Cd4, CD8+T-cell marker Cd8, and macrophage marker Cd86 were found to be significantly higher in the PTC in HT group compared to the NAT group. The IF staining results provided some extent of verification for the accuracy of the immune infiltration analysis results.

Microscopy scan of IF staining showed the distribution of Cd4(green), Cd8(green), and Cd86(green), in HT-related PTC tissues and normal tissues adjacent to the tumour (NAT). MFI: Mean Fluorescence Intensity.

Based on the three core genes screened in the RF algorithm, we conducted a search in the DGIdb database for relevant potential drugs. The results showed that only FCER1G had relevant drugs, while no relevant drugs were found for CD53 and TYROBP. FCER1G was predicted to have two potential drugs: benzylpenicilloyl polylysine and aspirin. Among these, benzylpenicilloyl polylysine had the highest score of 29.49, while aspirin had a score of only 1.26. We hypothesise that benzylpenicilloyl polylysine and aspirin may be effective in the treatment of HT and PTC and may prevent HT carcinogenesis.

See original here:
Identification and validation of potential common biomarkers for papillary thyroid carcinoma and Hashimoto's thyroiditis ... - Nature.com

Looking to break into AI? These 6 schools offer master’s in artificial intelligence programs – Fortune

While buzz about artificial intelligence (AI) has largely focused on the growing popularity of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, the demand for jobs and growth in the sector is booming. In fact, AI and machine learning specialist roles are growing faster than any other occupation in the world, according to the World Economic Reports Future of Jobs Report.

Ryan Aytay, CEO of Tableau, says AI and big datas rapid growth in popularity and growth has created a need for everyone to learn the appropriate skills as well as to more broadly adopt a philosophy of lifelong learning.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join a global network of thought leaders and innovators. Understand the changes required across your organization to drive successful AI adoption.

[AI] only seems to have accelerated this need for everyone, not just business users, not just analysts, really everyone to have the ability to not only see and understand but also use that data to make decisions with regardless of what they need to be focused on, Aytay says.

Over the past few months, more universities have sought to meet the AI demand head on by creating degree programs specifically focused on the subject. For example, just in March 2024, Purdue Universitya school known for its strong engineering armannounced a brand new online masters in AI.

If AI from a business perspective interests you, youre in luck, too. Many business schools now offer MBA specializations in AI as well as certifications focused on the subject.

And while there are also options to take free online courses in artificial intelligence, many schools now offer full-fledged degree tracks. Fortune compiled a list of six masters in AI programs to check out if youre looking to make a career switch.

At Duke University, students in the artificial intelligence for product innovation master of engineering program can complete courses in -person in 12 to 16 months or online within 24 months. Students can also choose from a variety of learning tracksor a focusincluding data science and machine learning.

The program also includes a capstone project and summer internship. Graduates often move intotake jobs as machine learning engineers, AI engineers, data scientists, and data engineers for companies including OpenAI, Doordash, and Targets AI Lab within six months of graduation. All students must complete an online data science and Python bootcamp the summer before the start of their program.

Students complete 10 courses during the program, covering topics including AI, machine learning, operations, and management. The management courses are offered through Dukes Law School and Fuqua School of Business, which Fortune ranks as having one of the top full-time MBA programs in the U.S.

Applicants are expected to have an undergraduate degree in science or engineering (or equivalent technical work experience), minimum one year of programming experience, two semesters completed of calculus, and meet English proficiency admission requirements (for international students).

The cost of Dukes program depends on the modality (online or in-person) and the amount of time taken to complete the degree. Applications require transcripts, short-answer essay responses, a resume, three letters of recommendation, and an introductory video. Prospective students have the option to submit GRE scores.

Format: Online or in-person

Cost: $99,734 (online); $113,892 (in-person)

Deadlines: Round 1: January 15 (online and in-person); Round 2: March 15 (in-person), April 15 (online)

Johns Hopkins University offers both a masters degree and a graduate certificate in artificial intelligence through its Whiting School of Engineering. The online masters in AI includes 10 coursesfour core courses and six electivesand students can take up to five years to complete them.

Curriculum includes algorithms, applied machine learning, and creating AI-enabled systems. Johns Hopkins does require several prerequisite courses including calculus, programming, and linear algebra, but will offer provisional admission for students to complete the required courses prior to enrollment.

GRE scores arent required to apply, but most admitted students have at least a 3.0 undergraduate GPA.

Format: Online

Cost: $52,700 (estimated total program price)

Deadlines: Open year-round (terms begin in spring, summer, and fall)

Northwestern Universitys masters in artificial intelligence seeks to train those with a desire to become architects of intelligent systems. Through the program, students learn the psychological and design implications of AI and how business needs may be satisfied.

Students can take a traditional track or choose the MSAI+X program and combine AI with their original field of study. The program is limited to approximately 40 students per year and lasts for 15 months.

Applicants should have a bachelors in computer science or related field, and preference will be given to those with at least two years of relevant work experience.

Format: In-person

Cost: ~$110,000

Deadlines: December 15 (priority); March 15 (final)

Purdues new masters in artificial intelligence seeks to prepare students to succeed in todays increasingly tech-reliant world. Students will learn practical skills in AI and computing as well as professional skills like leadership and project management and technical skills like programming and machine learning.

Participants can choose two major tracks: AI and machine learning or AI management and policy. Admissions requirements differ depending on which major is chosen. There is no application fee to apply. While English proficiency testing is required for international students, GRE and GMAT scores are not needed.

Format: Online

Cost: ~$28,000

Deadlines: August 1 (fall); December 1 (spring); April 1 (summer)

The masters in AI at the University of MichiganDearborn teaches students the foundational theory and practice of AI. The program is very flexibility in the sense that students can choose to learn online, in-person, or hybrid, and learn either on a full- or part-time basis. Because of the latter offering, courses are hosted in the late afternoon or evening hours.

Students can focus on four different concentrations: computer vision, intelligence interaction, machine learning, or knowledge management and reasoning. Admission into the program requires students to have graduated with bachelors degree in a STEM field with a B average. Mathematics skills, such as calculus III and linear algebra, is recommended but not required.

Format: Online, in-person, or hybrid

Cost: $50,208/year (direct + indirect costs, out-of-state)

Deadlines: Rolling admission

UTAustin offers its online masters program in AI through its department of computer science and machine learning laboratory, and the degree can be completed at your own pace. The degree covers about two years worth of content. The program is offered on the online education platform, edX, an online education platform, and costs $10,000 to complete, making it one of the more affordable options.

The degree covers AI-related topics, including natural language processing, reinforcement learning, computer vision, and deep learning, which prepares graduates for A.I. jobs in engineering, research and development, product management, and consulting.

The program quickly skyrocketed in popularity, with more than 4,000 prospective students requesting more information from the university within 24 hours of its launch announcement.

Prospective students must submit an application to the Graduate School at The University of Texas at Austin as well as a statement of purpose, resume, and transcripts. Letters of recommendation and GRE scores are optional to submit.

Format: Online

Cost: $10,000 (202324 academic year)

Deadlines: Fall: April 1 (priority), May 1 (final); Spring: August 15 (priority), September 15 (final)

Yes, having a masters in AI can be very beneficial for those wanting to become AI experts. However, it is also important to keep in mind that AI is always evolving. By the time your program completes, some of the skills and best practices you initially learned could be out of date.

Yes, you will need to learn how to code if you plan to study AI in an advanced degree program. Python is generally considered to be the most relevant programming language to AI. Having skills in Java, SQL, C++, and R also couldnt hurt. Some masters in AI programs, like Duke, require students to have some programming experience as well as to enroll in a Python bootcamp.

The best degree pathway for those interested in AI truly depends on your interests.

A masters in AI will likely give you a perfect entry into careers in AI, data science, machine learning, and beyond. If you know a particular specialization in the tech space interests you more than another, that is a great place to start. Above all, keep in mind that because AI masters are new, there is no perfect path; its up to you to define it.

Check out all of Fortunes rankings of degree programs, and learn more about specific career paths.

Sydney Lake contributed to this piece.

Original post:
Looking to break into AI? These 6 schools offer master's in artificial intelligence programs - Fortune

Machine learning identifies prognostic subtypes of the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

Howlader, N. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 19752017 Vol. 4 (National Cancer Institute, 2020).

Google Scholar

Liao, G. et al. Prognostic role of soluble programmed death ligand 1 in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 11, 774131 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tubin, S., Khan, M. K., Gupta, S. & Jeremic, B. Biology of NSCLC: Interplay between cancer cells, radiation and tumor immune microenvironment. Cancers 13, 775 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Barta, J. A., Powell, C. A. & Wisnivesky, J. P. Global epidemiology of lung cancer. Ann. Glob. Health 85, 2419 (2019).

Google Scholar

Howlader, N. et al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 640649 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 734 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Varela, G. & Thomas, P. A. Surgical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Dis. 6, S217 (2014).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Miller, K. D. et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 363385 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Goldstraw, P. et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer. The Lancet 378, 17271740 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Tang, C. et al. Development of an immune-pathology informed radiomics model for non-small cell lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 8, 19 (2018).

ADS Google Scholar

Azuma, K. et al. Association of PD-L1 overexpression with activating EGFR mutations in surgically resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 25, 19351940 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Meyers, D., Bryan, P., Banerji, S. & Morris, D. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr. Oncol. 25, 324334 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Garon, E. B. et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of nonsmall-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 20182028 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Brahmer, J. R. et al. Safety and activity of antiPD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 24552465 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Glatzel-Plucinska, N. et al. SATB1 level correlates with Ki-67 expression and is a positive prognostic factor in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 38, 723736 (2018).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pawelczyk, K. et al. Role of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer and their prognostic significance according to clinicopathological factors and diagnostic markers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 824 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shimoji, M. et al. Clinical and pathologic features of lung cancer expressing programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Lung Cancer 98, 6975 (2016).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Sun, J.-M. et al. Prognostic significance of PD-L1 in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: A large cohort study of surgically resected cases. J. Thorac. Oncol. 11, 10031011 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhou, C. et al. PD-L1 expression as poor prognostic factor in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 8, 58457 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cooper, W. A. et al. PD-L1 expression is a favorable prognostic factor in early stage non-small cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer 89, 181188 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Teng, M. W., Ngiow, S. F., Ribas, A. & Smyth, M. J. Classifying cancers based on T-cell infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res. 75, 21392145 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Guo, W., Ji, Y. & Catenacci, D. V. A subgroup cluster-based Bayesian adaptive design for precision medicine. Biometrics 73, 367377 (2017).

Article MathSciNet PubMed Google Scholar

Fisher, R., Pusztai, L. & Swanton, C. Cancer heterogeneity: Implications for targeted therapeutics. Br. J. Cancer 108, 479485 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dagogo-Jack, I. & Shaw, A. T. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 8194 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yu, D. et al. Machine learning prediction of the adverse outcome for nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 7, 21782185 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Luo, W. et al. Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: A multidisciplinary view. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e323 (2016).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sun, W., Jiang, M., Dang, J., Chang, P. & Yin, F.-F. Effect of machine learning methods on predicting NSCLC overall survival time based on Radiomics analysis. Radiat. Oncol. 13, 18 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Ou, F.-S., Michiels, S., Shyr, Y., Adjei, A. A. & Oberg, A. L. Biomarker discovery and validation: Statistical considerations. J. Thorac. Oncol. 16, 537545 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Heiden, B. T. et al. Analysis of delayed surgical treatment and oncologic outcomes in clinical stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2111613e2111613 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Andersen, P. K. & Gill, R. D. Coxs regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Ann. Stat. 10, 11001120 (1982).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Kalbfleisch, J. D. & Prentice, R. L. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data (Wiley, 2011).

Google Scholar

Binder, H., Allignol, A., Schumacher, M. & Beyersmann, J. Boosting for high-dimensional time-to-event data with competing risks. Bioinformatics 25, 890896 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U. B., Blackstone, E. H. & Lauer, M. S. Random survival forests. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2, 841860 (2008).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Jaeger, B. C. et al. Oblique random survival forests. Ann. Appl. Stat. 13, 18471883 (2019).

Article MathSciNet PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Harrell, F. E., Califf, R. M., Pryor, D. B., Lee, K. L. & Rosati, R. A. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Jama 247, 25432546 (1982).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Lang, M. et al. mlr3: A modern object-oriented machine learning framework in R. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1903 (2019).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Stekhoven, D. J. & Stekhoven, M. D. J. Package missForest. R package version 1 (2013).

Read the original post:
Machine learning identifies prognostic subtypes of the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC | Scientific Reports - Nature.com

Prompt engineering techniques and best practices: Learn by doing with Anthropic’s Claude 3 on Amazon Bedrock … – AWS Blog

You have likely already had the opportunity to interact with generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools (such as virtual assistants and chatbot applications) and noticed that you dont always get the answer you are looking for, and that achieving it may not be straightforward. Large language models (LLMs), the models behind the generative AI revolution, receive instructions on what to do, how to do it, and a set of expectations for their response by means of a natural language text called a prompt. The way prompts are crafted greatly impacts the results generated by the LLM. Poorly written prompts will often lead to hallucinations, sub-optimal results, and overall poor quality of the generated response, whereas good-quality prompts will steer the output of the LLM to the output we want.

In this post, we show how to build efficient prompts for your applications. We use the simplicity of Amazon Bedrock playgrounds and the state-of-the-art Anthropics Claude 3 family of models to demonstrate how you can build efficient prompts by applying simple techniques.

Prompt engineering is the process of carefully designing the prompts or instructions given to generative AI models to produce the desired outputs. Prompts act as guides that provide context and set expectations for the AI. With well-engineered prompts, developers can take advantage of LLMs to generate high-quality, relevant outputs. For instance, we use the following prompt to generate an image with the Amazon Titan Image Generation model:

An illustration of a person talking to a robot. The person looks visibly confused because he can not instruct the robot to do what he wants.

We get the following generated image.

Lets look at another example. All the examples in this post are run using Claude 3 Haiku in an Amazon Bedrock playground. Although the prompts can be run using any LLM, we discuss best practices for the Claude 3 family of models. In order to get access to the Claude 3 Haiku LLM on Amazon Bedrock, refer to Model access.

We use the following prompt:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

The request prompt is actually very ambiguous. 10 + 10 may have several valid answers; in this case, Claude 3 Haiku, using its internal knowledge, determined that 10 + 10 is 20. Lets change the prompt to get a different answer for the same question:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

The response changed accordingly by specifying that 10 + 10 is an addition. Additionally, although we didnt request it, the model also provided the result of the operation. Lets see how, through a very simple prompting technique, we can obtain an even more succinct result:

Claude 3 Haiku response:

Well-designed prompts can improve user experience by making AI responses more coherent, accurate, and useful, thereby making generative AI applications more efficient and effective.

The Claude 3 family is a set of LLMs developed by Anthropic. These models are built upon the latest advancements in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML), allowing them to understand and generate human-like text with remarkable fluency and coherence. The family is comprised of three models: Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus.

Haiku is the fastest and most cost-effective model on the market. It is a fast, compact model for near-instant responsiveness. For the vast majority of workloads, Sonnet is two times faster than Claude 2 and Claude 2.1, with higher levels of intelligence, and it strikes the ideal balance between intelligence and speedqualities especially critical for enterprise use cases. Opus is the most advanced, capable, state-of-the-art foundation model (FM) with deep reasoning, advanced math, and coding abilities, with top-level performance on highly complex tasks.

Among the key features of the models family are:

To learn more about the Claude 3 family, see Unlocking Innovation: AWS and Anthropic push the boundaries of generative AI together, Anthropics Claude 3 Sonnet foundation model is now available in Amazon Bedrock, and Anthropics Claude 3 Haiku model is now available on Amazon Bedrock.

As prompts become more complex, its important to identify its various parts. In this section, we present the components that make up a prompt and the recommended order in which they should appear:

The following is an example of a prompt that incorporates all the aforementioned elements:

In the following sections, we dive deep into Claude 3 best practices for prompt engineering.

For prompts that deal only with text, follow this set of best practices to achieve better results:

The Claude 3 family offers vision capabilities that can process images and return text outputs. Its capable of analyzing and understanding charts, graphs, technical diagrams, reports, and other visual assets. The following are best practices when working with images with Claude 3:

Consider the following example, which is an extraction of the picture a fine gathering (Author: Ian Kirck, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A_fine_gathering_(8591897243).jpg).

We ask Claude 3 to count how many birds are in the image:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

In this example, we asked Claude to take some time to think and put its reasoning in an XML tag and the final answer in another. Also, we gave Claude time to think and clear instructions to pay attention to details, which helped Claude to provide the correct response.

Lets see an example with the following image:

In this case, the image itself is the prompt: Claude 3 Haikus response:

Lets look at the following example:

Prompt:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

Lets see an example. We pass to Claude the following map chart in image format (source: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions), then we ask about Japans greenhouse gas emissions.

Prompt:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

Lets see an example of narration with the following image (source: Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf):

Prompt:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

In this example, we were careful to control the content of the narration. We made sure Claude didnt mention any extra information or discuss anything it wasnt completely confident about. We also made sure Claude covered all the key details and numbers presented in the slide. This is very important because the information from the narration in text format needs to be precise and accurate in order to be used to respond to questions.

Information extraction is the process of automating the retrieval of specific information related to a specific topic from a collection of texts or documents. LLMs can extract information regarding attributes given a context and a schema. The kinds of documents that can be better analyzed with LLMs are resumes, legal contracts, leases, newspaper articles, and other documents with unstructured text.

The following prompt instructs Claude 3 Haiku to extract information from short text like posts on social media, although it can be used for much longer pieces of text like legal documents or manuals. In the following example, we use the color code defined earlier to highlight the prompt sections:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

The prompt incorporates the following best practices:

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is an approach in natural language generation that combines the strengths of information retrieval and language generation models. In RAG, a retrieval system first finds relevant passages or documents from a large corpus based on the input context or query. Then, a language generation model uses the retrieved information as additional context to generate fluent and coherent text. This approach aims to produce high-quality and informative text by using both the knowledge from the retrieval corpus and the language generation capabilities of deep learning models. To learn more about RAG, see What is RAG? and Question answering using Retrieval Augmented Generation with foundation models in Amazon SageMaker JumpStart.

The following prompt instructs Claude 3 Haiku to answer questions about a specific topic and use a context from the retrieved information. We use the color code defined earlier to highlight the prompt sections:

Claude 3 Haikus response:

The prompt incorporates the following best practices:

In this post, we explored best prompting practices and demonstrated how to apply them with the Claude 3 family of models. The Claude 3 family of models are the latest and most capable LLMs available from Anthropic.

We encourage you to try out your own prompts using Amazon Bedrock playgrounds on the Amazon Bedrock console, and try out the official Anthropic Claude 3 Prompt Engineering Workshop to learn more advanced techniques. You can send feedback to AWS re:Post for Amazon Bedrock or through your usual AWS Support contacts.

Refer to the following to learn more about the Anthropic Claude 3 family:

David Laredo is a Prototyping Architect at AWS, where he helps customers discover the art of the possible through disruptive technologies and rapid prototyping techniques. He is passionate about AI/ML and generative AI, for which he writes blog posts and participates in public speaking sessions all over LATAM. He currently leads the AI/ML experts community in LATAM.

Claudia Cortes is a Partner Solutions Architect at AWS, focused on serving Latin American Partners. She is passionate about helping partners understand the transformative potential of innovative technologies like AI/ML and generative AI, and loves to help partners achieve practical use cases. She is responsible for programs such as AWS Latam Black Belt, which aims to empower partners in the Region by equipping them with the necessary knowledge and resources.

Simn Crdova is a Senior Solutions Architect at AWS, focused on bridging the gap between AWS services and customer needs. Driven by an insatiable curiosity and passion for generative AI and AI/ML, he tirelessly explores ways to leverage these cutting-edge technologies to enhance solutions offered to customers.

Gabriel Velazquez is a Sr Generative AI Solutions Architect at AWS, he currently focuses on supporting Anthropic on go-to-market strategy. Prior to working in AI, Gabriel built deep expertise in the telecom industry where he supported the launch of Canadas first 4G wireless network. He now combines his expertise in connecting a nation with knowledge of generative AI to help customers innovate and scale.

Originally posted here:
Prompt engineering techniques and best practices: Learn by doing with Anthropic's Claude 3 on Amazon Bedrock ... - AWS Blog

PND-Net: plant nutrition deficiency and disease classification using graph convolutional network | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

Jung, M. et al. Construction of deep learning-based disease detection model in plants. Sci. Rep. 13, 7331 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Aiswarya, J., Mariammal, K. & Veerappan, K. Plant nutrient deficiency detection and classification-a review. In 2023 5th International Conference Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA). 796802 (IEEE, 2023).

Yan, Q., Lin, X., Gong, W., Wu, C. & Chen, Y. Nutrient deficiency diagnosis of plants based on transfer learning and lightweight convolutional neural networks Mobilenetv3-large. In Proceedings of the 2022 11th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition. 2633 (2022).

Sudhakar, M. & Priya, R. Computer vision based machine learning and deep learning approaches for identification of nutrient deficiency in crops: A survey. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 22 (2023).

Noon, S. K., Amjad, M., Qureshi, M. A. & Mannan, A. Use of deep learning techniques for identification of plant leaf stresses: A review. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 28, 100443 (2020).

Google Scholar

Waheed, H. et al. Deep learning based disease, pest pattern and nutritional deficiency detection system for Zingiberaceae crop. Agriculture 12, 742 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Barbedo, J. G. A. Detection of nutrition deficiencies in plants using proximal images and machine learning: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 162, 482492 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Shadrach, F. D., Kandasamy, G., Neelakandan, S. & Lingaiah, T. B. Optimal transfer learning based nutrient deficiency classification model in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula). Sci. Rep. 13, 14108 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sathyavani, R., JaganMohan, K. & Kalaavathi, B. Classification of nutrient deficiencies in rice crop using DenseNet-BC. Mater. Today Proc. 56, 17831789 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Haris, S., Sai, K.S., Rani, N.S. etal. Nutrient deficiency detection in mobile captured guava plants using light weight deep convolutional neural networks. In 2023 2nd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC). 11901193 (IEEE, 2023).

Munir, S., Seminar, K.B., Sukoco, H. etal. The application of smart and precision agriculture (SPA) for measuring leaf nitrogen content of oil palm in peat soil areas. In 2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE). 650655 (IEEE, 2023).

Lu, J., Peng, K., Wang, Q. & Sun, C. Lettuce plant trace-element-deficiency symptom identification via machine vision methods. Agriculture 13, 1614 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Omer, S.M., Ghafoor, K.Z. & Askar, S.K. Lightweight improved YOLOv5 model for cucumber leaf disease and pest detection based on deep learning. In Signal, Image and Video Processing. 114 (2023).

Kumar, A. & Bhowmik, B. Automated rice leaf disease diagnosis using CNNs. In 2023 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP). 16 (IEEE, 2023).

Senjaliya, H. etal. A comparative study on the modern deep learning architectures for predicting nutritional deficiency in rice plants. In 2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET). 16 (IEEE, 2023).

Ennaji, O., Vergutz, L. & ElAllali, A. Machine learning in nutrient management: A review. Artif. Intell. Agric. (2023).

Rathnayake, D., Kumarasinghe, K., Rajapaksha, R. & Katuwawala, N. Green insight: A novel approach to detecting and classifying macro nutrient deficiencies in paddy leaves. In 2023 8th International Conference Information Technology Research (ICITR). 16 (IEEE, 2023).

Asaari, M. S.M., Shamsudin, S. & Wen, L.J. Detection of plant stress condition with deep learning based detection models. In 2023 International Conference on Energy, Power, Environment, Control, and Computing (ICEPECC). 15 (IEEE, 2023).

Tavanapong, W. et al. Artificial intelligence for colonoscopy: Past, present, and future. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 26, 39503965 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kipf, T. N. & Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2017).

Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J. & Maciejewski, R. Graph convolutional networks: A comprehensive review. Comput. Soc. Netw. 6, 123 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Bera, A., Wharton, Z., Liu, Y., Bessis, N. & Behera, A. SR-GNN: Spatial relation-aware graph neural network for fine-grained image categorization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 31, 60176031 (2022).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Qu, Z., Yao, T., Liu, X. & Wang, G. A graph convolutional network based on univariate neurodegeneration biomarker for Alzheimers disease diagnosis. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med. (2023).

Khlifi, M. K., Boulila, W. & Farah, I. R. Graph-based deep learning techniques for remote sensing applications: Techniques, taxonomy, and applicationsA comprehensive review. Comput. Sci. Rev. 50, 100596 (2023).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Sunitha, P., Uma, B., Channakeshava, S. & Babu, S. A fully labelled image dataset of banana leaves deficient in nutrients. Data Brief 48, 109155 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Tuesta-Monteza, V. A., Mejia-Cabrera, H. I. & Arcila-Diaz, J. CoLeaf-DB: Peruvian coffee leaf images dataset for coffee leaf nutritional deficiencies detection and classification. Data Brief 48, 109226 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chungcharoen, T. et al. Machine learning-based prediction of nutritional status in oil palm leaves using proximal multispectral images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 198, 107019 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Bhavya, T., Seggam, R. & Jatoth, R.K. Fertilizer recommendation for rice crop based on NPK nutrient deficiency using deep neural networks and random forest algorithm. In 2023 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP). 15 (IEEE, 2023).

Dey, B., Haque, M. M. U., Khatun, R. & Ahmed, R. Comparative performance of four CNN-based deep learning variants in detecting Hispa pest, two fungal diseases, and npk deficiency symptoms of rice (Oryza sativa). Comput. Electron. Agric. 202, 107340 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Cevallos, C., Ponce, H., Moya-Albor, E. & Brieva, J. Vision-based analysis on leaves of tomato crops for classifying nutrient deficiency using convolutional neural networks. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). 17 (IEEE, 2020).

Espejo-Garcia, B., Malounas, I., Mylonas, N., Kasimati, A. & Fountas, S. Using Efficientnet and transfer learning for image-based diagnosis of nutrient deficiencies. Comput. Electron. Agric. 196, 106868 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, C., Ye, Y., Tian, Y. & Yu, Z. Classification of nutrient deficiency in rice based on cnn model with reinforcement learning augmentation. In 2021 International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and its Application on Media (ISAIAM). 107111 (IEEE, 2021).

Bahtiar, A.R., Santoso, A.J., Juhariah, J. etal. Deep learning detected nutrient deficiency in chili plant. In 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT). 14 (IEEE, 2020).

Rahadiyan, D., Hartati, S., Nugroho, A.P. etal. Feature aggregation for nutrient deficiency identification in chili based on machine learning. Artif. Intell. Agric. (2023).

Aishwarya, M. & Reddy, P. Ensemble of CNN models for classification of groundnut plant leaf disease detection. Smart Agric. Technol. 100362 (2023).

Nadafzadeh, M. et al. Design, fabrication and evaluation of a robot for plant nutrient monitoring in greenhouse (case study: iron nutrient in spinach). Comput. Electron. Agric. 217, 108579 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Desiderio, J. M.H., Tenorio, A. J.F. & Manlises, C.O. Health classification system of romaine lettuce plants in hydroponic setup using convolutional neural networks (CNN). In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET). 16 (IEEE, 2022).

Costa, L., Kunwar, S., Ampatzidis, Y. & Albrecht, U. Determining leaf nutrient concentrations in citrus trees using UAV imagery and machine learning. Precis. Agric. 122 (2022).

Lanjewar, M.G. & Parab, J.S. CNN and transfer learning methods with augmentation for citrus leaf diseases detection using PaaS cloud on mobile. Multimed. Tools Appl. 126 (2023).

Lanjewar, M.G., Morajkar, P. P. Modified transfer learning frameworks to identify potato leaf diseases. Multimed. Tools Appl. 123 (2023).

Dissanayake, A. etal. Detection of diseases and nutrition in bell pepper. In 2023 5th International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC). 286291 (IEEE, 2023).

Wu, Z., Jiang, F. & Cao, R. Research on recognition method of leaf diseases of woody fruit plants based on transfer learning. Sci. Rep. 12, 15385 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Liu, H., Lv, H., Li, J., Liu, Y. & Deng, L. Research on maize disease identification methods in complex environments based on cascade networks and two-stage transfer learning. Sci. Rep. 12, 18914 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kukreja, V., Sharma, R., Vats, S. & Manwal, M. DeepLeaf: Revolutionizing rice disease detection and classification using convolutional neural networks and random forest hybrid model. In 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). 16 (IEEE, 2023).

Bezabih, Y. A., Salau, A. O., Abuhayi, B. M., Mussa, A. A. & Ayalew, A. M. CPD-CCNN: Classification of pepper disease using a concatenation of convolutional neural network models. Sci. Rep. 13, 15581 (2023).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Kini, A. S., Prema, K. & Pai, S. N. Early stage black pepper leaf disease prediction based on transfer learning using convnets. Sci. Rep. 14, 1404 (2024).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wu, Q. et al. A classification method for soybean leaf diseases based on an improved convnext model. Sci. Rep. 13, 19141 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ma, X., Chen, W. & Xu, Y. ERCP-Net: A channel extension residual structure and adaptive channel attention mechanism for plant leaf disease classification network. Sci. Rep. 14, 4221 (2024).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Babatunde, R. S. et al. A novel smartphone application for early detection of habanero disease. Sci. Rep. 14, 1423 (2024).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nagasubramanian, G. et al. Ensemble classification and IoT-based pattern recognition for crop disease monitoring system. IEEE Internet Things J. 8, 1284712854 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Nachtigall, L.G., Araujo, R.M. & Nachtigall, G.R. Classification of apple tree disorders using convolutional neural networks. In 2016 IEEE 28th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). 472476 (IEEE, 2016).

Borhani, Y., Khoramdel, J. & Najafi, E. A deep learning based approach for automated plant disease classification using vision transformer. Sci. Rep. 12, 11554 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Aishwarya, M. & Reddy, A. P. Dataset of groundnut plant leaf images for classification and detection. Data Brief 48, 109185 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Shi, J. et al. Cervical cell classification with graph convolutional network. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 198, 105807 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Fahad, N.M., Azam, S., Montaha, S. & Mukta, M. S.H. Enhancing cervical cancer diagnosis with graph convolution network: AI-powered segmentation, feature analysis, and classification for early detection. Multimed. Tools Appl. 125 (2024).

Lanjewar, M. G., Panchbhai, K. G. & Patle, L. B. Fusion of transfer learning models with LSTM for detection of breast cancer using ultrasound images. Comput. Biol. Med. 169, 107914 (2024).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37, 19041916 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Szegedy, C. etal. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 19 (2015).

Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J. & Wojna, Z. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 28182826 (2016).

Chollet, F. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition. 12511258 (2017).

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 770778 (2016).

Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A. & Chen, L.-C. MobileNetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 45104520 (2018).

Bera, A., Nasipuri, M., Krejcar, O. & Bhattacharjee, D. Fine-grained sports, yoga, and dance postures recognition: A benchmark analysis. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 113 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Bera, A., Wharton, Z., Liu, Y., Bessis, N. & Behera, A. Attend and guide (AG-Net): A keypoints-driven attention-based deep network for image recognition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30, 36913704 (2021).

Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar

Singh, D. etal. PlantDoc: A dataset for visual plant disease detection. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD. 249253 (ACM, 2020).

Hameed, Z., Garcia-Zapirain, B., Aguirre, J. J. & Isaza-Ruget, M. A. Multiclass classification of breast cancer histopathology images using multilevel features of deep convolutional neural network. Sci. Rep. 12, 15600 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shabrina, N. H. et al. A novel dataset of potato leaf disease in uncontrolled environment. Data Brief 52, 109955 (2024).

See more here:
PND-Net: plant nutrition deficiency and disease classification using graph convolutional network | Scientific Reports - Nature.com