Archive for the ‘Machine Learning’ Category

Reinforcement learning AI might bring humanoid robots to the real world – Science News Magazine

ChatGPT and other AI tools are upending our digital lives, but our AI interactions are about to get physical. Humanoid robots trained with a particular type of AI to sense and react to their world could lend a hand in factories, space stations, nursing homes and beyond. Two recent papers in Science Robotics highlight how that type of AI called reinforcement learning could make such robots a reality.

Weve seen really wonderful progress in AI in the digital world with tools like GPT, says Ilija Radosavovic, a computer scientist at the University of California, Berkeley. But I think that AI in the physical world has the potential to be even more transformational.

The state-of-the-art software that controls the movements of bipedal bots often uses whats called model-based predictive control. Its led to very sophisticated systems, such as the parkour-performing Atlas robot from Boston Dynamics. But these robot brains require a fair amount of human expertise to program, and they dont adapt well to unfamiliar situations. Reinforcement learning, or RL, in which AI learns through trial and error to perform sequences of actions, may prove a better approach.

We wanted to see how far we can push reinforcement learning in real robots, says Tuomas Haarnoja, a computer scientist at Google DeepMind and coauthor of one of the Science Robotics papers. Haarnoja and colleagues chose to develop software for a 20-inch-tall toy robot called OP3, made by the company Robotis. The team not only wanted to teach OP3 to walk but also to play one-on-one soccer.

Soccer is a nice environment to study general reinforcement learning, says Guy Lever of Google DeepMind, a coauthor of the paper. It requires planning, agility, exploration, cooperation and competition.

The toy size of the robots allowed us to iterate fast, Haarnoja says, because larger robots are harder to operate and repair. And before deploying the machine learning software in the real robots which can break when they fall over the researchers trained it on virtual robots, a technique known as sim-to-real transfer.

Training of the virtual bots came in two stages. In the first stage, the team trained one AI using RL merely to get the virtual robot up from the ground, and another to score goals without falling over. As input, the AIs received data including the positions and movements of the robots joints and, from external cameras, the positions of everything else in the game. (In a recently posted preprint, the team created a version of the system that relies on the robots own vision.) The AIs had to output new joint positions. If they performed well, their internal parameters were updated to encourage more of the same behavior. In the second stage, the researchers trained an AI to imitate each of the first two AIs and to score against closely matched opponents (versions of itself).

To prepare the control software, called a controller, for the real-world robots, the researchers varied aspects of the simulation, including friction, sensor delays and body-mass distribution. They also rewarded the AI not just for scoring goals but also for other things, like minimizing knee torque to avoid injury.

Real robots tested with the RL control software walked nearly twice as fast, turned three times as quickly and took less than half the time to get up compared with robots using the scripted controller made by the manufacturer. But more advanced skills also emerged, like fluidly stringing together actions. It was really nice to see more complex motor skills being learned by robots, says Radosavovic, who was not a part of the research. And the controller learned not just single moves, but also the planning required to play the game, like knowing to stand in the way of an opponents shot.

In my eyes, the soccer paper is amazing, says Joonho Lee, a roboticist at ETH Zurich. Weve never seen such resilience from humanoids.

But what about human-sized humanoids? In the other recent paper, Radosavovic worked with colleagues to train a controller for a larger humanoid robot. This one, Digit from Agility Robotics, stands about five feet tall and has knees that bend backward like an ostrich. The teams approach was similar to Google DeepMinds. Both teams used computer brains known as neural networks, but Radosavovic used a specialized type called a transformer, the kind common in large language models like those powering ChatGPT.

Instead of taking in words and outputting more words, the model took in 16 observation-action pairs what the robot had sensed and done for the previous 16 snapshots of time, covering roughly a third of a second and output its next action. To make learning easier, it first learned based on observations of its actual joint positions and velocity, before using observations with added noise, a more realistic task. To further enable sim-to-real transfer, the researchers slightly randomized aspects of the virtual robots body and created a variety of virtual terrain, including slopes, trip-inducing cables and bubble wrap.

After training in the digital world, the controller operated a real robot for a full week of tests outside preventing the robot from falling over even a single time. And in the lab, the robot resisted external forces like having an inflatable exercise ball thrown at it. The controller also outperformed the non-machine-learning controller from the manufacturer, easily traversing an array of planks on the ground. And whereas the default controller got stuck attempting to climb a step, the RL one managed to figure it out, even though it hadnt seen steps during training.

Reinforcement learning for four-legged locomotion has become popular in the last few years, and these studies show the same techniques now working for two-legged robots. These papers are either at-par or have pushed beyond manually defined controllers a tipping point, says Pulkit Agrawal, a computer scientist at MIT. With the power of data, it will be possible to unlock many more capabilities in a relatively short period of time.

And the papers approaches are likely complementary. Future AI robots may need the robustness of Berkeleys system and the dexterity of Google DeepMinds. Real-world soccer incorporates both. According to Lever, soccer has been a grand challenge for robotics and AI for quite some time.

Read the original post:
Reinforcement learning AI might bring humanoid robots to the real world - Science News Magazine

Study uses AI and machine learning to accelerate protein engineering process – Dailyuw

In recent months, the process of protein design at UW has been revolutionized by the implementation of a machine learning computational approach. In a new paper published in the journal Nature Computational Science, the UW molecular design Berndt Lab reports its findings.

Machine learning, recently applied to the realm of protein engineering, has been effective in reducing the amount of time needed to design proteins that can efficiently perform a biochemical task. The current trial-and-error method of mutating an amino acid sequence can take anywhere from several months to upward of years of tedious analysis. However, with the recent use of machine learning at the Berndt Lab, the future of protein engineering appears promising.

The application of machine learning was used to analyze how mutations to GCaMP, a biosensor that tracks calcium in cells, would affect its behavior. Collaborators provided empirical knowledge of GCaMP, which was then combined with an AI algorithm that could predict the effects of the protein mutations. Well-developed proteins can provide valuable insight to disease and a patients response to treatment.

The machine learning model achieved the equivalent of several years worth of lab mutations in a single night, with a very high rate of success. Of the 17 mutations implemented in real biological cells, five or six were absolute successes. According to Andre Berndt, assistant professor in the department of bioengineering and senior author on the paper, out of 10 mutations you are typically lucky if just one provides a gain of function.

A lot of the mutations that were predicted to be better were indeed better at a much, much faster pace from a much larger pool of virtually tested mutations, Berndt said. So this was a very efficient process just based on the trained model.

Berndts team was comprised of graduate and undergraduate students who collaborated on the study. Lead author Sarah Wait, a Ph.D. candidate in molecular engineering,spearheaded the research by undertaking various roles such as testing mutation variants, engineering data, establishing the machine learning framework, and analyzing the results.

Computational programs can discover all of the really hard-to-observe patterns that, maybe, we wouldnt be able to observe ourselves, Wait said. It's just a really great tool to help us as the researcher[s] discover these really small patterns that may be hidden to us given the amount of data we have to look at in order to actually see them.

Reach contributing writer Ashley Ingalsbe at news@dailyuw.com X: @ashleyiing

Like what youre reading? Support high-quality student journalism by donating here.

See original here:
Study uses AI and machine learning to accelerate protein engineering process - Dailyuw

The 2034 Millionaire’s Club: 3 Machine Learning Stocks to Buy Now – InvestorPlace

Machine learning stocks are gaining traction as the interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning soars, especially after the launch of ChatGPT by OpenAI. This technology has given us a glimpse of its potential, sparking curiosity about its future applications, and has led to my list of machine learning stocks to buy.

Machine learning stocks present a promising opportunity for growth, with the potential to create significant wealth. As per analyst forecasts, I think around a decade from now is when we will see these companies go parabolic and reach their full growth potential.

These companies leverage machine learning for various applications, including diagnosing life-threatening diseases, preventing credit card fraud, developing chatbots and exploring advanced tech like artificial general intelligence. The future will only get better from here.

So if youre looking for machine learning stocks to buy with substantial upside potential, keep reading to discover three top picks.

Source: Lori Butcher / Shutterstock.com

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) leverages machine learning to enhance its online sports betting and gambling platform. The company has shown significant growth, with recent revenue increases and expansion in legalized betting markets.

DKNG has significantly revised its revenue outlook for 2024 upwards, expecting it to be between $4.65 billion and $4.9 billion, marking an anticipated year-over-year growth of 27% to 34%. This adjustment reflects higher projections compared to their earlier forecast ranging from $4.50 billion to $4.80 billion. Additionally, the company has increased its adjusted EBITDA forecast for 2024, now ranging from $410 million to $510 million, up from the previous estimate of $350 million to $450 million.

DraftKings has also announced plans to acquire the gambling company Jackpocket for $750 million in a cash-and-stock deal. This acquisition is expected to further enhance DraftKings market presence and capabilities in online betting.

I covered DKNG before, and I still think its one of the best meme stocks that investors can get behind. The companys stock price has risen 72.64% over the past year, and it seems theres still plenty of fuel left in the tank to surge higher.

Source: Sundry Photography / Shutterstock

Cloudflare (NYSE:NET) provides a cloud platform that offers a range of network services to businesses worldwide. The company uses machine learning to enhance its cybersecurity solutions.

Cloudflare has outlined a robust strategy for 2024, focusing on advancing its cybersecurity solutions and expanding its network services. The company expects to generate total revenue between $1.648 billion and $1.652 billion for the year. This revenue forecast reflects a significant increase in their operational scale.

NET is another stock that is leveraging machine learning to its full advantage. Ive been bullish on this company for some time and continue to be so. Notably, Cloudflare is expanding its deployment of inference-tuned graphic processing units (GPUs) across its global network. By the end of 2024, these GPUs will be deployed in nearly every city within Cloudflares network.

NET has been silently integrating many parts of its network within the internets fabric for millions of users, such as through its DNS service, Cloudflare WARP; reverse proxy for website owners; and much more. Around 30% of the 10,000 most popular websites globally use Cloudflare. Many of NETs services can be accessed free of charge.

It is following a classic tech stock strategy of expanding its users, influence and reach over reaching immediate profits, and its financials have slowly scaled with this performance.

Source: VDB Photos / Shutterstock.com

CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) is a leading cybersecurity company that uses machine learning to detect and prevent cyber threats.

In its latest quarterly report on Mar. 5, CRWD reported a 102% earnings growth to 95 cents per share and a 33% revenue increase to $845.3 million. Analysts expect a 57% earnings growth to 89 cents per share in the next report and a 27% EPS increase for the full fiscal year ending in January.

Adding to the bull case for CRWD is that it has has partnered with Google Cloud by Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, GOOGL) to enhance AI-native cybersecurity solutions, positioning itself strongly against competitors like Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ:PANW).

Many contributors here at Investorplace have identified CRWD as one of the best cybersecurity stocks for investors to buy, and I am in agreement here. Its aggressive EPS growth and stock price appreciation (140.04% over the past year), make it a very attractive pick for long-term investors.

On the date of publication, Matthew Farley did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Matthew started writing coverage of the financial markets during the crypto boom of 2017 and was also a team member of several fintech startups. He then started writing about Australian and U.S. equities for various publications. His work has appeared in MarketBeat, FXStreet, Cryptoslate, Seeking Alpha, and the New Scientist magazine, among others.

Read more:
The 2034 Millionaire's Club: 3 Machine Learning Stocks to Buy Now - InvestorPlace

A double machine learning model for measuring the impact of the Made in China 2025 strategy on green economic … – Nature.com

Cheng, K. & Liu, S. Does urbanization promote the urbanrural equalization of basic public services? Evidence from prefectural cities in China. Appl. Econ. 56(29), 34453459. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2206625 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Yin, X. & Xu, Z. An empirical analysis of the coupling and coordinative development of Chinas green finance and economic growth. Resour. Policy 75, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102476 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., Ferreira, J. J. M. & Hughes, M. Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice?. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 30(4), 20212037. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2730 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Orsatti, G., Quatraro, F. & Pezzoni, M. The antecedents of green technologies: The role of team-level recombinant capabilities. Res. Policy 49(3), 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103919 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Lin, B. & Zhou, Y. Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives. Energy 241(15), 122518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122518 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Fang, M. & Chang, C. L. Nexus between fiscal imbalances, green fiscal spending, and green economic growth: Empirical findings from E-7 economies. Econ. Change Restruct. 55, 24232443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09392-6 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Qian, Y., Liu, J. & Forrest, J. Y. L. Impact of financial agglomeration on regional green economic growth: Evidence from China. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 65(9), 16111636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1941811 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Awais, M., Afzal, A., Firdousi, S. & Hasnaoui, A. Is fintech the new path to sustainable resource utilisation and economic development?. Resour. Policy 81, 103309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103309 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Ahmed, E. M. & Elfaki, K. E. Green technological progress implications on long-run sustainable economic growth. J. Knowl. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01268-y (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Shen, F. et al. The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation. J. Environ. Manag. 292(15), 112765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Zhao, L. et al. Enhancing green economic recovery through green bonds financing and energy efficiency investments. Econ. Anal. Policy 76, 488501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.019 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Ferreira, J. J. et al. Diverging or converging to a green world? Impact of green growth measures on countries economic performance. Environ. Dev. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02991-x (2023).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Song, X., Zhou, Y. & Jia, W. How do economic openness and R&D investment affect green economic growth?Evidence from China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 149, 405415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.050 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Xu, J., She, S., Gao, P. & Sun, Y. Role of green finance in resource efficiency and green economic growth. Resour. Policy 81, 103349 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Tian, L. & Yang, X. Schumpeterian endogenous growth model under green innovation and its enculturation effect. Energy Econ. 127, 107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107109 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Luukkanen, J. et al. Resource efficiency and green economic sustainability transition evaluation of green growth productivity gap and governance challenges in Cambodia. Sustain. Dev. 27(3), 312320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1902 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, K., Umar, M., Akram, R. & Caglar, E. Is technological innovation making world Greener? An evidence from changing growth story of China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 165, 120516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120516 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Talebzadehhosseini, S. & Garibay, I. The interaction effects of technological innovation and path-dependent economic growth on countries overall green growth performance. J. Clean. Prod. 333(20), 130134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130134 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Ge, T., Li, C., Li, J. & Hao, X. Does neighboring green development benefit or suffer from local economic growth targets? Evidence from China. Econ. Modell. 120, 106149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106149 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Lin, B. & Zhu, J. Fiscal spending and green economic growth: Evidence from China. Energy Econ. 83, 264271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.010 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Sohail, M. T., Ullah, S. & Majeed, M. T. Effect of policy uncertainty on green growth in high-polluting economies. J. Clean. Prod. 380(20), 135043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135043 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Sarwar, S. Impact of energy intensity, green economy and blue economy to achieve sustainable economic growth in GCC countries: Does Saudi Vision 2030 matters to GCC countries. Renew. Energy 191, 3046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.122 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Park, J. & Page, G. W. Innovative green economy, urban economic performance and urban environments: An empirical analysis of US cities. Eur. Plann. Stud. 25(5), 772789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1282078 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Feng, Y., Chen, Z. & Nie, C. The effect of broadband infrastructure construction on urban green innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Econ. Anal. Policy 77, 581598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.020 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, X. & Fan, D. Collaborative emission reduction research on dual-pilot policies of the low-carbon city and smart city from the perspective of multiple innovations. Urban Climate 47, 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101364 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Cheng, J., Yi, J., Dai, S. & Xiong, Y. Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from Chinas pilot low-carbon city initiative. J. Clean. Prod. 231(10), 11581170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.327 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Li, L. Chinas manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of Made-in-China 2025 and Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 135, 6674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, J., Wu, H. & Chen, Y. Made in China 2025 and manufacturing strategy decisions with reverse QFD. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 224, 107539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107539 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, X., Megginson, W. L. & Xia, J. Industrial policy and asset prices: Evidence from the Made in China 2025 policy. J. Bank. Finance 142, 106554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106554 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Chen, K. et al. How does industrial policy experimentation influence innovation performance? A case of Made in China 2025. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 40. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02497-x (2024).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Xu, L. Towards green innovation by Chinas industrial policy: Evidence from Made in China 2025. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 924250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.924250 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Li, X., Han, H. & He, H. Advanced manufacturing firms digital transformation and exploratory innovation. Appl. Econ. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2305665 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, G. & Liu, B. How digital technology improves the high-quality development of enterprises and capital markets: A liquidity perspective. Finance Res. Lett. 53, 103683 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Chernozhukov, V. et al. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econom. J. 21(1), C1C68. https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12097 (2018).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Athey, S., Tibshirani, J. & Wager, S. Generalized random forests. Ann. Stat. 47(2), 11481178. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOS1709 (2019).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Knittel, C. R. & Stolper, S. Machine learning about treatment effect heterogeneity: The case of household energy use. AEA Pap. Proc. 111, 440444 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Yang, J., Chuang, H. & Kuan, C. Double machine learning with gradient boosting and its application to the Big N audit quality effect. J. Econom. 216(1), 268283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.01.018 (2020).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Li, H. & Ren, G. Quantifying the social impacts of the London Night Tube with a double/debiased machine learning based difference-in-differences approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 163, 288303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.07.015 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Farbmacher, H., Huber, M., Laffrs, L., Langen, H. & Spindler, M. Causal mediation analysis with double machine learning. Econom. J. 25(2), 277300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac003 (2022).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Chiang, H., Kato, K., Ma, Y. & Sasaki, Y. Multiway cluster robust double/debiased machine learning. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 40(3), 10461056. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2021.1895815 (2022).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Bodory, H., Huber, M. & Laffrs, L. Evaluating (weighted) dynamic treatment effects by double machine learning. Econom. J. 25(3), 628648. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac018 (2022).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Waheed, R., Sarwar, S. & Alsaggaf, M. I. Relevance of energy, green and blue factors to achieve sustainable economic growth: Empirical study of Saudi Arabia. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 187, 122184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122184 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Taskin, D., Vardar, G. & Okan, B. Does renewable energy promote green economic growth in OECD countries?. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 11(4), 771798. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0192 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Ding, X. & Liu, X. Renewable energy development and transportation infrastructure matters for green economic growth? Empirical evidence from China. Econ. Anal. Policy 79, 634646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.042 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Ferguson, P. The green economy agenda: Business as usual or transformational discourse?. Environ. Polit. 24(1), 1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.919748 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Pan, D., Yu, Y., Hong, W. & Chen, S. Does campaign-style environmental regulation induce green economic growth? Evidence from Chinas central environmental protection inspection policy. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231152483 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Qu, Y. & Zhan, L. Great transition and new pattern: Agriculture and rural area green development and its coordinated relationship with economic growth in China. J. Environ. Manag. 344, 118563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118563 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Li, J., Dong, K. & Dong, X. Green energy as a new determinant of green growth in China: The role of green technological innovation. Energy Econ. 114, 106260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106260 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Herman, K. S. et al. A critical review of green growth indicators in G7 economies from 1990 to 2019. Sustain. Sci. 18, 25892604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01397-y (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Mura, M., Longo, M., Zanni, S. & Toschi, L. Exploring socio-economic externalities of development scenarios. An analysis of EU regions from 2008 to 2016. J. Environ. Manag. 332, 117327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117327 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Read this article:
A double machine learning model for measuring the impact of the Made in China 2025 strategy on green economic ... - Nature.com

Machine learning models for predicting early hemorrhage progression in traumatic brain injury | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

In emergency situations, the collection of precise clinical information from trauma patients can be challenging, with accurate data often being elusive. Accurately assessing the risk of progression in traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is essential, particularly for patients who are relatively stable or exhibit minimal traumatic brain hemorrhage, compared to those immediately identified for emergency surgical intervention among the TBI cohort13,14. Additionally, accurately discerning details regarding the mechanism of head injury frequently proves difficult15.

In this study, the objective is to create a predictive model for the short-term prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury. This model emphasizes the use of clear and readily accessible information from the emergency department setting. Specifically, it relies on data from initial head CT scans and findings from physical examinations, both of which are readily available and easily obtained in the emergency room.

Previous literature has explored the analysis of various traumatic ICH types16. While lvarez-Sabn et al. have reported on the phenomenon of delayed traumatic ICH17, studies that demonstrate a variance in the frequency of ICH progression according to the type of ICH are lacking. Additionally, systematic clinical analyses on the influence of each ICH type on patient prognosis remain unexplored. The ICH type characterized in this study as petechial hemorrhage has also been referred to as blossomed or exhibiting a salt and pepper appearance in prior research16,18. Pathologically, this phenotype signifies a severe manifestation of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage that extends into the brain parenchyma, arising from progressive microvascular rupture and consequent bleeding. We hypothesized that PH type would have the worst prognosis due to these pathological differences, and this was confirmed by the XGboost model's feature importance analysis.

The clinical significance of counter coup head injury, characterized by brain injury occurring on the side opposite to the point of impact, has been suggested as a potential indicator of the severity of head trauma19. This perspective is based on the understanding that counter coup injuries are frequently associated with a higher risk of complications, including brain swelling and bleeding, compared to injuries that occur solely at the site of impact, known as coup injuries9.

In this study, we observed that the incidence of counter coup ICH was 17.9% in patients with occipital fractures, a rate higher than in patients with skull fractures at other locations (3.7% in frontal fractures, 7.2% in temporal fractures, and 3.7% in parietal fractures). This led to a notably increased frequency of ICH in the frontal lobe among patients whose initial impact was on the occipital skull. This observed trend may be linked to brain contusions that occur on the irregular surfaces of the anterior cranial fossa of the skull and structures like the anterior clinoid process. This could account for the prevalent association of counter coup ICH in the frontal lobe with TBIs involving occipital skull impacts9.

In our study, we successfully developed an algorithm capable of predicting an individual's prognosis using CT findings and clinical information. By integrating both clinical and radiological factors, such as counter coup injury and the specific type of ICH, we achieved high accuracy in predicting ICH progression among patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI).

The proposed XGBoost model demonstrated an average accuracy of 91% in predicting ICH progression, surpassing the logistic regression model, which achieved an AUC of 0.82. This enhanced performance emphasizes the efficacy of the XGBoost model in predicting ICH progression, highlighting the benefits of applying advanced machine learning techniques over traditional statistical methods for clinical predictions. Furthermore, our analysis validated the significant utility of SHAP values derived from the XGBoost model in assessing individual ICH progression risks. The incorporation of SHAP values enhances the visualization of individual risk factors, offering clinicians a crucial tool for interpreting the effects of various predictors on ICH progression at a personalized level. This capability facilitates more precise and tailored clinical decision-making.

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to develop a machine-learning model specifically for predicting ICH progression using image data from CT scans. We anticipate that our findings will contribute to the early identification of patients at risk for ICH progression, thereby informing treatment decisions and monitoring strategies. This approach has the potential to mitigate the risk of complications and enhance overall outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

The current study is subject to several limitations. Firstly, due to the limited number of patients in each age group, we were unable to analyze the risk of ICH progression across different age demographics. Secondly, we did not account for the potential impact of variables such as current medication use and underlying health conditions on ICH progression in TBI patients. Due to the challenges in obtaining a complete medical history from patients presenting to the emergency room with traumatic brain injury, our study focused primarily on factors that can be quickly and readily obtained in the ER, particularly radiological factors, to investigate their association with ICH progression. Although we investigated the history of antiplatelet and anticoagulation medication use, only a small proportion of patients (27 out of 650, or 4.2%) were confirmed to have used these medications. This limited number of patients was insufficient to establish a statistical correlation with ICH progression. This likely reflects the unreliability of initial medical history investigations and suggests that patients who were on antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy might have presented with more severe ICH, thus potentially excluding them from this study due to their immediate need for surgical intervention.

Thirdly, our machine learning model was developed using data from a single institution, highlighting the need for future studies to perform general validation of the models with external datasets.

In forthcoming research, we aim to enhance the accuracy of our algorithm in predicting the progression of TBI. To improve the predictability of our current machine learning algorithm, it will be crucial to gather more comprehensive individual information from patient medical records. Furthermore, future research should investigate the factors influencing the necessity of surgery among patients exhibiting ICH progression, particularly focusing on changes in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) following follow-up and the subsequent need for surgical intervention. Such analysis is anticipated to hold substantial clinical significance.

Follow this link:
Machine learning models for predicting early hemorrhage progression in traumatic brain injury | Scientific Reports - Nature.com